Pediatric Clinical Trials Workshop: Unmet Needs, Trial Designs and Clinically Meaningful Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes, 47008-47010 [E9-22012]
Download as PDF
47008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 176 / Monday, September 14, 2009 / Notices
[FR Doc. E9–22001 Filed 9–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–C
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0407]
Pediatric Clinical Trials Workshop:
Unmet Needs, Trial Designs and
Clinically Meaningful Safety and
Effectiveness Outcomes
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION: Notice of public workshop;
request for comments.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing a
public workshop entitled ‘‘Pediatric
Clinical Trials Workshop: Unmet Needs,
Trial Designs and Clinically Meaningful
Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes.’’
The purpose of the public workshop is
to solicit information from primary and
secondary health care providers,
academia, industry, and professional
societies on various aspects of device
clinical trials involving pediatric
diseases and patients. Information from
this public workshop will help
stimulate interest in pediatric device
clinical trial research methods, and
develop topics for further discussion
regarding the safety of pediatric device
clinical trials. The information gathered
in this and future workshops will help
to develop future guidance for
developing safe clinical trials for
devices intended for pediatric patients.
We encourage participation and
comments from workshop attendees on
the topics and questions discussed.
Please see instructions for registration
and for providing comments in the
sections of this document entitled
‘‘Registration’’ and ‘‘Comments.’’
Dates and Times: The public
workshop will be held on October 29,
2009, from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and
October 30, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 12
noon.
Location: The public workshop will
be held at the Holiday Inn College Park
located off I–95 at 10000 Baltimore
Ave., College Park, MD 20740. The hotel
front desk number is 1–301–345–6700.
For directions, please refer to the
meeting Web page: https://www.fda.gov/
MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/Workshops
Conferences/ucm170938.htm
Contact Person: Barbara Buch, Center
For Devices and Radiological Health,
Food and Drug Administration, Bldg.
66, rm. 1406, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Sep 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
796–5650, FAX: 301–847–8117, e-mail:
barbara.buch@fda.hhs.gov. If you need
special accommodations due to a
disability, (such as wheelchair access or
a sign language interpreter), please
notify Barbara Buch by September 30,
2009.
Registration: Registration and seating
will be on a first-come, first-served basis
and discussion preference will be
afforded to clinical research
investigators involved in pediatric
clinical device trials, health care givers,
and patient advocates. Please provide
your name, title, organization affiliation,
address, and e-mail contact information.
There is no registration fee to attend the
workshop. There will be no onsite
registration. Please register
electronically at https://www.fda.gov/
MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/Workshops
Conferences/default.htm by September
30, 2009. Due to limited space, and to
maximize participation, attendees are
asked to delegate one or two
representatives from their organizations
to participate in the general sessions. A
report of The Workshop and The
Information presented will be available
following the meeting via a link on the
meeting Web page. If you wish to make
an oral comment during or to attend the
public workshop, please note this in
your registration information. The
online registration form will instruct
you as to the information you should
provide prior to the meeting. In general,
a summary of the presentation and an
electronic copy of the presentation
should be submitted by October 1, 2009.
We will try to accommodate all persons
who wish to make oral comments
during the general sessions. However,
we strongly recommend that you
provide written comments as instructed
in this document to ensure that your
opinion, comments, and suggestions are
captured. Please refer to the section,
‘‘Comments’’ for instructions on how to
submit written comments.
Comments: The deadline for
submitting comments regarding this
public workshop is November 30, 2009.
Regardless of attendance at the public
workshop, interested persons may
submit written or electronic comments.
Written comments should be submitted
to the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Electronic
comments should be submitted to
https://www.regulations.gov. Comments
should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why Are We Holding This Public
Workshop?
The purpose of the public workshop
is to solicit expert input on topics
related to pediatric device clinical trials.
The agency seeks discussion between
FDA and other interested parties
regarding the conduct of clinical trials
to investigate device use in pediatric
populations. Other purposes of the
public workshop are, to identify any
gaps in such research, and to provide
information about evaluating the shortand long-term safety and effectiveness
of pediatric medical devices using valid
and sound scientific methods. Since the
2007 Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act was signed into law,
there has been increased interest in
conducting scientifically sound clinical
research related to pediatric
populations. It is hoped that this
meeting will provide a forum for open
discussion and information exchange
among interested parties, FDA, and
other stakeholders to lay a framework
for further research into the use of
devices to treat disorders and diseases
that affect pediatric patients.
II. What Will Be the Format for the
Meeting?
The format for the meeting will
include a general session in the morning
on the first day. Invited expert speakers
will present information regarding
current needs and concerns about
clinical trials that involve pediatric
patients. These presentations will
provide the topics for the small breakout
groups, which will begin in the
afternoon session of day one and
continue through the morning of day
two of the public workshop. Each of the
smaller breakout group discussion
sessions will be led and moderated by
a panel of experts in each of the
specialty focus areas listed in section III
of this document. Each small group
session will begin with an invited
presentation to describe the issues of
concern in the specific specialty. This
will be followed by a moderated
question and comment session
including both prespecified questions
posed to the assembled group and any
that arise during the workshop’s
discussions. Those in attendance will
have the opportunity in these small
group discussions to participate in the
discussion, ask questions, and provide
comments for consideration. Small
group discussions will be concluded in
the morning of day two. Small group
participation will be limited by space
and will be available on a first-come,
first-served basis. When registering for
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 176 / Monday, September 14, 2009 / Notices
the meeting, you should also designate
which small group discussion you
would like to attend because each
participant may register for only one of
the small group sessions.
At the conclusion of day two’s small
group discussions, the general session
will reconvene. After the general session
reconvenes, each small group will
report to the general session the results
of the discussions related to the general
questions posed to each group in outline
form.
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
III. What Are the General Topic Areas
We Intend to Address at the Public
Workshop?
We plan to discuss a number of
general disease/anatomical topical
issues at the conference, including the
following issues:
• Musculoskeletal disease,
• Cardiovascular disease,
• Abdominal disorders and
gastrointestinal (GI) diseases,
• Neurologic disorders and
conditions,
• Renal diseases, and
• Audiologic disorders.
The challenges posed by developing
diagnostic tests for pediatric patients
will be addressed as a part of discussion
under each topical area breakout
session. For each of the general disease/
anatomical topic areas, we will pose
questions to elicit and solicit scientific
and clinical discussion in the breakout
sessions. These include, but are not
limited to the following questions:
What are the most urgent unmet
needs?
What are the best practices for
conduct of clinical research, including
clinical trial design?
What are specific patient/caregiver
issues to consider?
What are the surrogate endpoints for
lifelong patient safety and effectiveness?
What are appropriate clinical
assessments?
What are appropriate endpoints that
determine clinical success?
The questions, listed in section IV of
this document, will be the focus of the
expert-moderated breakout discussions
in the afternoon of day one and the
morning of day two.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Sep 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
IV. What Are the Issues That Will Be
Discussed and Considered?
Questions for Discussion Regarding
Pediatric Device Clinical Trials
1. What Are the Five Most Important
Unmet Research Needs in Each Specific
Disease/Anatomic Category?
(musculoskeletal disease, cardiovascular
disease, abdominal disorders and GI
diseases, neurologic disorders and
conditions, renal diseases, and
audiologic disorders)
Although there are obvious barriers to
clinical trials such as concerns about the
effects on child development, there are
significant needs in both rare and
common diseases or disorders that have
not been met with modifications of
adult devices. We will start by asking
questions such as:
a. What are the most important unmet
device needs in each category?
b. What are the scientific or clinical
barriers or other potential barriers to
developing devices to meet those needs?
2. What Are Some Clinical Trial Designs
That Encourage Enrollment of Pediatric
Patients While Providing Quality Data
to Support Safety and Effectiveness of
Devices?
We need to understand:
a. What are appropriate controls to
use in pediatric trials to satisfy the legal
regulatory definitions of valid scientific
evidence as described in 21 CFR 860.7?
b. How can followup be maximized?
c. What timeframes are needed given
the age of patients and the expected
lifetime of the device/disease being
treated?
d. How do we understand the long
term effect on development and growth
in a short clinical trial?
3. Preclinical and Animal Studies
Although there are examples of
immature and fetal animal studies that
are well established for
pharmaceuticals, how do we translate
those concepts for devices?
a. What types of endpoints and
timeframes translate into outcomes in
the human population? How do we
know that?
b. How do we set a standard to judge
subsequent trial outcomes as acceptable
and safe?
c. What animal models exist or are
appropriate for studying each of the
diseases or disorders we identify as
significant unmet needs?
4. How Do We Measure Safety and
Effectiveness in a Pediatric Population?
The pediatric population cannot
always describe symptoms or functional
problems in the same way that adults
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47009
can. It therefore follows that the same
assessment tools and surrogate
endpoints will not apply to a pediatric
population.
Therefore we are striving to
understand:
a. What validated assessments are
needed or exist for the pediatric
population being treated?
b. What surrogate markers or
endpoints are needed for each disease?
c. What surrogates are needed or are
available to determine long-term
outcomes?
d. How do we validate surrogate
endpoints?
5. How Do We Know That the Study
and the Treatment Are Successful?
Assessment and judgment of patient
outcomes varies considerably for a
pediatric population. The needs of the
patient and his caregiver or parent must
be considered. The longevity of, and
durability of, devices captures a new
meaning when the lifespan is 50 to 60
years; remaining lifespan in adults is
very different. We are soliciting
feedback on:
a. What constitutes successful or
unsuccessful treatment outcomes?
b. What criteria should be used to
determine successful or unsuccessful
treatment outcomes?
c. What human factors in each case
need to be considered?
d. What patient factors unique to the
pediatric population have to be
considered?
e. What criteria are required to
acknowledge that successful treatment
for a patient has been achieved?
f. What constitutes a successful
clinical trial?
g. How long should a device or
treatment last to be considered
effective?
Please note funding options for
research have already been discussed at
prior public meetings and will not be
discussed at this workshop. Information
regarding funding sources is available
on government Web sites as well as
other public Web sites dedicated to
pediatric health.
V. Where Can I Find Out More About
This Public Workshop?
Background information on the public
workshop, registration information, the
agenda, information about lodging, and
other relevant information will be
posted, as it becomes available, on the
Internet at https://www.fda.gov/Medical
Devices/NewsEvents/Workshops
Conferences/default.htm.
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
47010
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 176 / Monday, September 14, 2009 / Notices
Organization and Basic Instructions for
Comments
To facilitate information gathering, we
invite written comments on the
questions presented in section IV of this
document. We intend to discuss and
expand on these same questions during
the small group discussions. If you wish
to comment in writing on a particular
question, please identify the question
that you are addressing before providing
your response to the question. For
example, your comment could take the
following format:
‘‘Question 1—[Quote the question].’’
‘‘Response—[Insert your response].’’
You do not have to address each
question. Additionally, for those
questions pertaining to the prevalence
of a particular need, problem or
scientific question, please provide data
and/or references so that we may
understand the basis for your comment,
figures, and any assumptions that you
used. Additionally, the goal of this
public workshop is to gain a greater
understanding of treatment needs and
needs for innovative solutions to those
needs. Accordingly, we look forward to
participation and comments from
manufacturers, innovators, and
organizations that either market or have
in development technologies that could
be used to treat pediatric patients.
Dated: September 3, 2009.
Catherine M. Cook,
Associate Director for Regulations and Policy,
Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. E9–22012 Filed 9–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
National Protection and Programs
Directorate; Methodology Technical
Implementation Functional Survey
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: National Protection and
Programs Directorate, DHS.
ACTION: 60–Day notice and request for
comments; new information collection
request, 1670–NEW.
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security, National Protection and
Programs Directorate, has submitted the
following Information Collection
Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35).
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until November 13,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Sep 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
2009. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.1.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
questions about this Information
Collection Request should be forwarded
to Lisa Hormann, Infrastructure
Information Collection Division, DHS/
NPPD/IP/IICD,
Lisa.hormann@associates.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Methodology Technical Implementation
(MTI) Project Office supports the 18
critical infrastructure and key resource
(CIKR) sectors by integrating risk and
vulnerability assessment methodologies
into automated tools. MTI efforts
address the unique needs and
requirements of each sector by working
with sector partners to develop tailored
solutions that enable the identification,
analysis, and management of sectorspecific security risks. The MTI team
collaborates with Sector-Specific
Agencies (SSAs), Sector and
Government Coordinating Councils
(SCCs and GCCs), and divisions within
the Department of Homeland Security’s
Office of Infrastructure Protection. The
MTI team also works with sector
specialists, risk analysts, private sector
individuals, and Federal agency
representatives. Efficient and effective
use of the MTI tools helps all CIKR
sectors nationwide reach their goal of
making their sectors safer and provides
a way to comply with recommendations
in the National Infrastructure Protection
Plan (NIPP). To ensure that interested
stakeholders achieve this mission, MTI
requests opinions and information from
users of the tool regarding tool functions
and improvements.
The MTI Project Office is
administered out of the Infrastructure
Information Collection Division (IICD)
in the Office of Infrastructure Protection
(IP). The survey data collected is for
internal MTI, IICD and IP use only. The
MTI Project Office will use the results
of the Functional Survey to determine
levels of customer satisfaction with the
MTI tools and prioritize future
improvements of key tool functions. The
results will also allow the program to
appropriate funds cost-effectively based
on user need, and cost savings while
improving the tool.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
which:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Analysis
Agency: Department of Homeland
Security, National Protection and
Programs Directorate.
Title: MTI Functional Survey.
OMB Number: 1670–NEW.
Frequency: Annual.
Affected Public: Business or other for
profit.
Number of Respondents: 5,500.
Estimated Time Per Respondent: 15
minutes (.25 hours).
Total Burden Hours: 1375 annual
burden hours.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintaining): $20,520.
Thomas Chase Garwood, III,
Chief Information Officer, National Protection
and Programs Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E9–22053 Filed 9–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9910–9P–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
National Protection and Programs
Directorate; Assessment
Questionnaire—Risk Self Assessment
Tool (R–SAT)
AGENCY: National Protection and
Programs Directorate, DHS.
ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for
comments; new information collection
request, 1670–NEW.
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security, National Protection and
Programs Directorate, has submitted the
following information collection request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and clearance
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until November 13,
2009. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.1.
ADDRESSES: Comments and questions
about this Information Collection
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47008-47010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22012]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0407]
Pediatric Clinical Trials Workshop: Unmet Needs, Trial Designs
and Clinically Meaningful Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public workshop; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public
workshop entitled ``Pediatric Clinical Trials Workshop: Unmet Needs,
Trial Designs and Clinically Meaningful Safety and Effectiveness
Outcomes.'' The purpose of the public workshop is to solicit
information from primary and secondary health care providers, academia,
industry, and professional societies on various aspects of device
clinical trials involving pediatric diseases and patients. Information
from this public workshop will help stimulate interest in pediatric
device clinical trial research methods, and develop topics for further
discussion regarding the safety of pediatric device clinical trials.
The information gathered in this and future workshops will help to
develop future guidance for developing safe clinical trials for devices
intended for pediatric patients. We encourage participation and
comments from workshop attendees on the topics and questions discussed.
Please see instructions for registration and for providing comments in
the sections of this document entitled ``Registration'' and
``Comments.''
Dates and Times: The public workshop will be held on October 29,
2009, from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and October 30, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 12
noon.
Location: The public workshop will be held at the Holiday Inn
College Park located off I-95 at 10000 Baltimore Ave., College Park, MD
20740. The hotel front desk number is 1-301-345-6700. For directions,
please refer to the meeting Web page: https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/ucm170938.htm
Contact Person: Barbara Buch, Center For Devices and Radiological
Health, Food and Drug Administration, Bldg. 66, rm. 1406, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-5650, FAX: 301-847-
8117, e-mail: barbara.buch@fda.hhs.gov. If you need special
accommodations due to a disability, (such as wheelchair access or a
sign language interpreter), please notify Barbara Buch by September 30,
2009.
Registration: Registration and seating will be on a first-come,
first-served basis and discussion preference will be afforded to
clinical research investigators involved in pediatric clinical device
trials, health care givers, and patient advocates. Please provide your
name, title, organization affiliation, address, and e-mail contact
information. There is no registration fee to attend the workshop. There
will be no onsite registration. Please register electronically at
https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/default.htm by September 30, 2009. Due to limited space, and to
maximize participation, attendees are asked to delegate one or two
representatives from their organizations to participate in the general
sessions. A report of The Workshop and The Information presented will
be available following the meeting via a link on the meeting Web page.
If you wish to make an oral comment during or to attend the public
workshop, please note this in your registration information. The online
registration form will instruct you as to the information you should
provide prior to the meeting. In general, a summary of the presentation
and an electronic copy of the presentation should be submitted by
October 1, 2009. We will try to accommodate all persons who wish to
make oral comments during the general sessions. However, we strongly
recommend that you provide written comments as instructed in this
document to ensure that your opinion, comments, and suggestions are
captured. Please refer to the section, ``Comments'' for instructions on
how to submit written comments.
Comments: The deadline for submitting comments regarding this
public workshop is November 30, 2009.
Regardless of attendance at the public workshop, interested persons
may submit written or electronic comments. Written comments should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Electronic comments should be submitted to https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments should be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why Are We Holding This Public Workshop?
The purpose of the public workshop is to solicit expert input on
topics related to pediatric device clinical trials. The agency seeks
discussion between FDA and other interested parties regarding the
conduct of clinical trials to investigate device use in pediatric
populations. Other purposes of the public workshop are, to identify any
gaps in such research, and to provide information about evaluating the
short- and long-term safety and effectiveness of pediatric medical
devices using valid and sound scientific methods. Since the 2007 Food
and Drug Administration Amendments Act was signed into law, there has
been increased interest in conducting scientifically sound clinical
research related to pediatric populations. It is hoped that this
meeting will provide a forum for open discussion and information
exchange among interested parties, FDA, and other stakeholders to lay a
framework for further research into the use of devices to treat
disorders and diseases that affect pediatric patients.
II. What Will Be the Format for the Meeting?
The format for the meeting will include a general session in the
morning on the first day. Invited expert speakers will present
information regarding current needs and concerns about clinical trials
that involve pediatric patients. These presentations will provide the
topics for the small breakout groups, which will begin in the afternoon
session of day one and continue through the morning of day two of the
public workshop. Each of the smaller breakout group discussion sessions
will be led and moderated by a panel of experts in each of the
specialty focus areas listed in section III of this document. Each
small group session will begin with an invited presentation to describe
the issues of concern in the specific specialty. This will be followed
by a moderated question and comment session including both prespecified
questions posed to the assembled group and any that arise during the
workshop's discussions. Those in attendance will have the opportunity
in these small group discussions to participate in the discussion, ask
questions, and provide comments for consideration. Small group
discussions will be concluded in the morning of day two. Small group
participation will be limited by space and will be available on a
first-come, first-served basis. When registering for
[[Page 47009]]
the meeting, you should also designate which small group discussion you
would like to attend because each participant may register for only one
of the small group sessions.
At the conclusion of day two's small group discussions, the general
session will reconvene. After the general session reconvenes, each
small group will report to the general session the results of the
discussions related to the general questions posed to each group in
outline form.
III. What Are the General Topic Areas We Intend to Address at the
Public Workshop?
We plan to discuss a number of general disease/anatomical topical
issues at the conference, including the following issues:
Musculoskeletal disease,
Cardiovascular disease,
Abdominal disorders and gastrointestinal (GI) diseases,
Neurologic disorders and conditions,
Renal diseases, and
Audiologic disorders.
The challenges posed by developing diagnostic tests for pediatric
patients will be addressed as a part of discussion under each topical
area breakout session. For each of the general disease/anatomical topic
areas, we will pose questions to elicit and solicit scientific and
clinical discussion in the breakout sessions. These include, but are
not limited to the following questions:
What are the most urgent unmet needs?
What are the best practices for conduct of clinical research,
including clinical trial design?
What are specific patient/caregiver issues to consider?
What are the surrogate endpoints for lifelong patient safety and
effectiveness?
What are appropriate clinical assessments?
What are appropriate endpoints that determine clinical success?
The questions, listed in section IV of this document, will be the
focus of the expert-moderated breakout discussions in the afternoon of
day one and the morning of day two.
IV. What Are the Issues That Will Be Discussed and Considered?
Questions for Discussion Regarding Pediatric Device Clinical Trials
1. What Are the Five Most Important Unmet Research Needs in Each
Specific Disease/Anatomic Category? (musculoskeletal disease,
cardiovascular disease, abdominal disorders and GI diseases, neurologic
disorders and conditions, renal diseases, and audiologic disorders)
Although there are obvious barriers to clinical trials such as
concerns about the effects on child development, there are significant
needs in both rare and common diseases or disorders that have not been
met with modifications of adult devices. We will start by asking
questions such as:
a. What are the most important unmet device needs in each category?
b. What are the scientific or clinical barriers or other potential
barriers to developing devices to meet those needs?
2. What Are Some Clinical Trial Designs That Encourage Enrollment of
Pediatric Patients While Providing Quality Data to Support Safety and
Effectiveness of Devices?
We need to understand:
a. What are appropriate controls to use in pediatric trials to
satisfy the legal regulatory definitions of valid scientific evidence
as described in 21 CFR 860.7?
b. How can followup be maximized?
c. What timeframes are needed given the age of patients and the
expected lifetime of the device/disease being treated?
d. How do we understand the long term effect on development and
growth in a short clinical trial?
3. Preclinical and Animal Studies
Although there are examples of immature and fetal animal studies
that are well established for pharmaceuticals, how do we translate
those concepts for devices?
a. What types of endpoints and timeframes translate into outcomes
in the human population? How do we know that?
b. How do we set a standard to judge subsequent trial outcomes as
acceptable and safe?
c. What animal models exist or are appropriate for studying each of
the diseases or disorders we identify as significant unmet needs?
4. How Do We Measure Safety and Effectiveness in a Pediatric
Population?
The pediatric population cannot always describe symptoms or
functional problems in the same way that adults can. It therefore
follows that the same assessment tools and surrogate endpoints will not
apply to a pediatric population.
Therefore we are striving to understand:
a. What validated assessments are needed or exist for the pediatric
population being treated?
b. What surrogate markers or endpoints are needed for each disease?
c. What surrogates are needed or are available to determine long-
term outcomes?
d. How do we validate surrogate endpoints?
5. How Do We Know That the Study and the Treatment Are Successful?
Assessment and judgment of patient outcomes varies considerably for
a pediatric population. The needs of the patient and his caregiver or
parent must be considered. The longevity of, and durability of, devices
captures a new meaning when the lifespan is 50 to 60 years; remaining
lifespan in adults is very different. We are soliciting feedback on:
a. What constitutes successful or unsuccessful treatment outcomes?
b. What criteria should be used to determine successful or
unsuccessful treatment outcomes?
c. What human factors in each case need to be considered?
d. What patient factors unique to the pediatric population have to
be considered?
e. What criteria are required to acknowledge that successful
treatment for a patient has been achieved?
f. What constitutes a successful clinical trial?
g. How long should a device or treatment last to be considered
effective?
Please note funding options for research have already been
discussed at prior public meetings and will not be discussed at this
workshop. Information regarding funding sources is available on
government Web sites as well as other public Web sites dedicated to
pediatric health.
V. Where Can I Find Out More About This Public Workshop?
Background information on the public workshop, registration
information, the agenda, information about lodging, and other relevant
information will be posted, as it becomes available, on the Internet at
https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/default.htm.
[[Page 47010]]
Organization and Basic Instructions for Comments
To facilitate information gathering, we invite written comments on
the questions presented in section IV of this document. We intend to
discuss and expand on these same questions during the small group
discussions. If you wish to comment in writing on a particular
question, please identify the question that you are addressing before
providing your response to the question. For example, your comment
could take the following format:
``Question 1--[Quote the question].''
``Response--[Insert your response].''
You do not have to address each question. Additionally, for those
questions pertaining to the prevalence of a particular need, problem or
scientific question, please provide data and/or references so that we
may understand the basis for your comment, figures, and any assumptions
that you used. Additionally, the goal of this public workshop is to
gain a greater understanding of treatment needs and needs for
innovative solutions to those needs. Accordingly, we look forward to
participation and comments from manufacturers, innovators, and
organizations that either market or have in development technologies
that could be used to treat pediatric patients.
Dated: September 3, 2009.
Catherine M. Cook,
Associate Director for Regulations and Policy, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. E9-22012 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S