Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for Stationing and Training of Increased Aviation Assets Within U.S. Army Alaska, 46984-46985 [E9-21933]
Download as PDF
46984
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 176 / Monday, September 14, 2009 / Notices
Category
Value
lllllllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllllllll
Total ............................................................................
Value
lllllllll
lllllllll
lllllllll
lllllllll
lllllllll
Total ...................
$ lllllllll
lllllllll
lllllllll
lllllllll
lllllllll
$lllllllll
34. Foreign Status Merchandise
Received:
Nonprivileged Foreign $.
Privileged Foreign $.
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
35. Customs duties collected on
merchandise entered into U.S. Customs
territory from the operation during the
year amounted to
$llllllllll.
36. (Optional) Attachment field: You
may attach any photographs of the
operation or any information you feel
may be useful.
Public comment on this proposal is
invited from interested parties. We ask
that parties fax a copy of their
comments, addressed to the Board’s
Executive Secretary, to (202) 482–0002
or e-mail comments to ftz@ita.doc.gov.
We also ask that parties submit the
original of their comments to the
Board’s Executive Secretary at the
following address: U.S. Department of
Commerce, Room 2111, 1401
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20230. The closing period for the
receipt of public comments is October
16, 2009. Any questions about this
proposal should be directed to Elizabeth
Whiteman at
Elizabeth_Whiteman@ita.doc.gov or
(202) 482–0473.
Dated: September 3, 2009.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–22064 Filed 9–11–09; 8:45 am]
15:23 Sep 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
lllllllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllllllll
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Rhonda Cundiff, Program Analyst,
Contract Policy Division, GSA, (202)
219–1813, or via e-mail to
rhonda.cundiff@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
Category
VerDate Nov<24>2008
llllllllll
llllllllll
llllllllll
$llllllllll
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
33. Main Categories of Merchandise
Forwarded (Top Five)
BILLING CODE P
Main countries of origin
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–00XX]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Information Collection; Hubzone
Program
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding a new OMB
information clearance.
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Secretariat will be submitting to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
a new information collection
requirement regarding HUBZone
Program revisions.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the FAR,
and whether it will have practical
utility; whether our estimate of the
public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on
valid assumptions and methodology;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, through the use of appropriate
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
November 13, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden to the Regulatory Secretariat
(VPR), General Services Administration,
Room 4041, 1800 F Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20405. Please cite OMB
Control No. 9000–XXXX, HUBZone
Program, in all correspondence.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Purpose
This information collection facilitates
implementation of a HUBZone Program
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
revision as a result of revisions to the
Small Business Administration
regulations. The revision to the FAR
requires the HUBZone offeror to provide
the Contracting Officer a copy of the
notice required by 13 CFR 126.601 if
material changes occur before contract
award that could affect its HUBZone
eligibility. This notification to the
contracting officer ensures that the
offeror is still eligible for the award of
a HUBZone contract.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Number of Respondents: 8,000.
Responses Per Respondent: 1.
Hours Per Response: .25.
Total Burden Hours: 2,000.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat (VPR), 1800 F
Street, NW., Room 4041, Washington,
DC 20405, telephone (202) 501–4755.
Please cite OMB Control No. 9000–
XXXX, HUBZone Program, in all
correspondence.
Dated: September 8, 2009.
Al Matera,
Director, Acquisition Policy Division.
[FR Doc. E9–22060 Filed 9–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) for Stationing and Training of
Increased Aviation Assets Within U.S.
Army Alaska
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of Availability (NOA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army
announces the availability of an FEIS for
the implementation of the decision to
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 176 / Monday, September 14, 2009 / Notices
increase numbers and types of aviation
assets and training at Fort Wainwright,
Fort Richardson, or other military
installations in Alaska. The proposed
aviation unit, an Aviation Task Force or
Combat Aviation Brigade, would
potentially consist of up to 62 medium
and heavy lift helicopters, 30 combat
scout helicopters, 24 attack helicopters,
and between 1,200 to 2,850 Soldiers.
DATES: The waiting period for the FEIS
will end 30 days after the publication of
an NOA in the Federal Register by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be forwarded to Ms. Carrie McEnteer,
Directorate of Public Works, Attention:
IMPA–FWA–PWE, 1060 Gaffney Road
#4500, Fort Wainwright, AK 99703–
4500, by fax at (907) 361–9867, or by
e-mail at carrie.mcenteer@us.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Linda L. Douglass, Public Affairs Office,
1060 Gaffney Road #5900, Fort
Wainwright, AK 99703–5900;
telephone: (907) 353–6701, e-mail:
linda.douglass@us.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Proposed Action and analysis in the
FElS includes the reorganization of
existing aviation assets (approximately
490 Soldiers and 32 medium and heavy
lift helicopters) in U.S. Army Alaska
(USARAK) to become a frontline
aviation unit with an increased capacity
that could range in size from an
Aviation Task Force (approximately
1,200 Soldiers, 42 medium and heavy
lift helicopters and 30 combat scout
helicopters) to a Combat Aviation
Brigade (approximately 2,850 Soldiers,
62 medium and heavy lift helicopters,
30 combat scout helicopters, and 24
attack aviation helicopters).
While USARAK has historically
supported unit training activities within
Alaska with rotary-winged aircraft
(helicopters), the types and numbers of
current assets are not sufficient to
provide the full range of integrated
tactical training required by the modern
Brigade Combat Team. The proposed
increase and reorganization of
USARAK’s aviation assets would
resolve this shortcoming. The new
aviation unit would provide key
aviation assets for operational
deployment abroad and would serve to
enhance the training capability of
USARAK’s two Brigade Combat Teams
by providing a local opportunity to
conduct integrated training with
multiple types of Army aviation assets.
In addition to consideration of a No
Action Alternative (use of existing
aviation assets and infrastructure to
support USARAK Brigade Combat Team
training with no increase to current
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Sep 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
integrated land-air training capability),
two additional alternatives are proposed
as possible scenarios for the
reorganization of existing USARAK
aviation assets. The alternatives vary by
aviation unit size, aviation asset
composition, and stationing location.
Alternatives include: (1) Expansion of
Existing Aviation Units into an Aviation
Task Force—convert existing USARAK
aviation assets into an Aviation Task
Force (station 710 additional Soldiers
and 40 additional helicopters, build
sufficient new infrastructure to support
the new aviation inventory at Fort
Wainwright, and conduct increased
aviation training on existing Alaska
military training lands and ranges); and
(2) Expansion of Existing Aviation
Assets into a Combat Aviation Brigade
with stationing of Soldiers and
helicopters at Fort Wainwright, Fort
Richardson, and Eielson Air Force
Base—convert existing USARAK
aviation assets into a Combat Aviation
Brigade (station 2,360 additional
Soldiers and an additional 84
helicopters (30 medium and heavy lift
type, 30 combat scout type, and 24
attack type) at the three military
installations, build sufficient new
infrastructure only at Fort Wainwright
to support the new aviation inventory,
and conduct increased aviation training
on existing Alaska military training
lands and ranges). After reviewing the
alternatives presented in the FEIS, the
Army has selected the Aviation Task
Force alternative as its preferred
alternative.
Implementation of this proposed
action is expected to result in direct,
indirect and cumulative impacts as a
result of troop stationing, facilities
construction and helicopter training
exercises at USARAK. The principal
environmental impacts discussed in the
EIS are airspace management, cultural
and visual resources, noise, hazardous
materials and hazardous waste, and
wildlife. Although additional
helicopters would be stationed in
Alaska, existing airspace aviation travel
routes would be utilized resulting in
minor increases in air traffic. Significant
adverse impacts would occur to the
Ladd Field National Historic Landmark
as a result of facility construction at Fort
Wainwright. Adverse impacts would be
the result of the new construction being
out of scale with historic buildings,
historical view-shed obstruction and
change in use of two historic buildings.
Temporary minor noise impacts would
occur due to facility construction. Noise
associated with helicopter training
would increase but not to a level that
would significantly increase annoyance
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46985
levels at Fort Wainwright or
surrounding lands. Hazardous materials
and waste, both existing sources and
those created by the stationing and
operation of an aviation unit, will be
managed under existing programs and
agreements. Facility construction is
proposed within known areas of
contamination. USARAK will continue
to consult with the appropriate State
and Federal agencies as outlined in
existing agreements in order to protect
human health and the environment.
Various wildlife species would be
affected by increased military training
(specifically moose, bison, caribou,
trumpeter swan and bear); however,
population level impacts would not
occur. In addition, increased hunting
pressure on game mammals could result
from increased stationing of Soldiers.
Copies of the FEIS are available for
public review at local libraries and at
the following Web site: https://
www.usarak.army.mil/conservation/
NEPA_home.html. Comments from the
public will be considered before any
final decision is made.
Dated: September 2, 2009.
Addison D. Davis, IV,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Environment, Safety and Occupational
Health).
[FR Doc. E9–21933 Filed 9–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) for Grow the Army Actions at
Fort Lewis and the Yakima Training
Center (YTC), WA
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of Availability (NOA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army
announces the availability of a DEIS that
analyzes the environmental and
socioeconomic impacts of implementing
the stationing and realignment decisions
in the 2007 ‘‘Grow the Army’’
Programmatic EIS (GTA PEIS) and other
ongoing Army realignment and
stationing initiatives pertaining to Fort
Lewis and YTC. The GTA PEIS Record
of Decision (ROD) specified the
stationing of additional units at Fort
Lewis including an Expeditionary
Sustainment Command, and directed
unit restructuring actions that would
increase active duty strength at Fort
Lewis by approximately 1,900 Soldiers.
The DEIS also analyzes Fort Lewis and
YTC as potential locations for the
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46984-46985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21933]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for Stationing and
Training of Increased Aviation Assets Within U.S. Army Alaska
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the availability of an
FEIS for the implementation of the decision to
[[Page 46985]]
increase numbers and types of aviation assets and training at Fort
Wainwright, Fort Richardson, or other military installations in Alaska.
The proposed aviation unit, an Aviation Task Force or Combat Aviation
Brigade, would potentially consist of up to 62 medium and heavy lift
helicopters, 30 combat scout helicopters, 24 attack helicopters, and
between 1,200 to 2,850 Soldiers.
DATES: The waiting period for the FEIS will end 30 days after the
publication of an NOA in the Federal Register by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be forwarded to Ms. Carrie McEnteer,
Directorate of Public Works, Attention: IMPA-FWA-PWE, 1060 Gaffney Road
4500, Fort Wainwright, AK 99703-4500, by fax at (907) 361-
9867, or by e-mail at carrie.mcenteer@us.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Linda L. Douglass, Public Affairs
Office, 1060 Gaffney Road 5900, Fort Wainwright, AK 99703-
5900; telephone: (907) 353-6701, e-mail: linda.douglass@us.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Proposed Action and analysis in the FElS
includes the reorganization of existing aviation assets (approximately
490 Soldiers and 32 medium and heavy lift helicopters) in U.S. Army
Alaska (USARAK) to become a frontline aviation unit with an increased
capacity that could range in size from an Aviation Task Force
(approximately 1,200 Soldiers, 42 medium and heavy lift helicopters and
30 combat scout helicopters) to a Combat Aviation Brigade
(approximately 2,850 Soldiers, 62 medium and heavy lift helicopters, 30
combat scout helicopters, and 24 attack aviation helicopters).
While USARAK has historically supported unit training activities
within Alaska with rotary-winged aircraft (helicopters), the types and
numbers of current assets are not sufficient to provide the full range
of integrated tactical training required by the modern Brigade Combat
Team. The proposed increase and reorganization of USARAK's aviation
assets would resolve this shortcoming. The new aviation unit would
provide key aviation assets for operational deployment abroad and would
serve to enhance the training capability of USARAK's two Brigade Combat
Teams by providing a local opportunity to conduct integrated training
with multiple types of Army aviation assets.
In addition to consideration of a No Action Alternative (use of
existing aviation assets and infrastructure to support USARAK Brigade
Combat Team training with no increase to current integrated land-air
training capability), two additional alternatives are proposed as
possible scenarios for the reorganization of existing USARAK aviation
assets. The alternatives vary by aviation unit size, aviation asset
composition, and stationing location. Alternatives include: (1)
Expansion of Existing Aviation Units into an Aviation Task Force--
convert existing USARAK aviation assets into an Aviation Task Force
(station 710 additional Soldiers and 40 additional helicopters, build
sufficient new infrastructure to support the new aviation inventory at
Fort Wainwright, and conduct increased aviation training on existing
Alaska military training lands and ranges); and (2) Expansion of
Existing Aviation Assets into a Combat Aviation Brigade with stationing
of Soldiers and helicopters at Fort Wainwright, Fort Richardson, and
Eielson Air Force Base--convert existing USARAK aviation assets into a
Combat Aviation Brigade (station 2,360 additional Soldiers and an
additional 84 helicopters (30 medium and heavy lift type, 30 combat
scout type, and 24 attack type) at the three military installations,
build sufficient new infrastructure only at Fort Wainwright to support
the new aviation inventory, and conduct increased aviation training on
existing Alaska military training lands and ranges). After reviewing
the alternatives presented in the FEIS, the Army has selected the
Aviation Task Force alternative as its preferred alternative.
Implementation of this proposed action is expected to result in
direct, indirect and cumulative impacts as a result of troop
stationing, facilities construction and helicopter training exercises
at USARAK. The principal environmental impacts discussed in the EIS are
airspace management, cultural and visual resources, noise, hazardous
materials and hazardous waste, and wildlife. Although additional
helicopters would be stationed in Alaska, existing airspace aviation
travel routes would be utilized resulting in minor increases in air
traffic. Significant adverse impacts would occur to the Ladd Field
National Historic Landmark as a result of facility construction at Fort
Wainwright. Adverse impacts would be the result of the new construction
being out of scale with historic buildings, historical view-shed
obstruction and change in use of two historic buildings. Temporary
minor noise impacts would occur due to facility construction. Noise
associated with helicopter training would increase but not to a level
that would significantly increase annoyance levels at Fort Wainwright
or surrounding lands. Hazardous materials and waste, both existing
sources and those created by the stationing and operation of an
aviation unit, will be managed under existing programs and agreements.
Facility construction is proposed within known areas of contamination.
USARAK will continue to consult with the appropriate State and Federal
agencies as outlined in existing agreements in order to protect human
health and the environment. Various wildlife species would be affected
by increased military training (specifically moose, bison, caribou,
trumpeter swan and bear); however, population level impacts would not
occur. In addition, increased hunting pressure on game mammals could
result from increased stationing of Soldiers.
Copies of the FEIS are available for public review at local
libraries and at the following Web site: https://www.usarak.army.mil/conservation/NEPA_home.html. Comments from the public will be
considered before any final decision is made.
Dated: September 2, 2009.
Addison D. Davis, IV,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Environment, Safety and
Occupational Health).
[FR Doc. E9-21933 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M