Action Affecting Export Privileges; Bertrand Lalsingh, 46416-46417 [E9-21634]

Download as PDF 46416 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 9, 2009 / Notices cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES obtaining the required authorization from the U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Controls. Freyer was sentenced to be imprisoned for 17 months and upon release from imprisonment be placed on probation for 2 years. In addition Freyer was fined $10,000.00. He was released from prison on April 21, 2009. Section 766.25 of the Export Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or ‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the export privileges of any person who has been convicted of a violation of the [Export Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’)], the EAR, or any order, license or authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license, or order issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18 U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms Export control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15 CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. § 24 10(h). The denial of export privileges under this provision may be for a period of up to 10 years from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. app. § 24 10(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of the Regulations states that the Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office of Exporter Services may revoke any Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) licenses previously issued in which the person had an interest in at the time of his conviction. I have received notice of Freyer’s conviction for violating the IEEPA, and have provided notice and an opportunity for Freyer to make a written submission to BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of the Regulations. I have received a submission from Freyer. Based upon my review and consideration of that submission, my consultations with BIS’s Office of Export Enforcement, including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, I have decided to deny Freyer’s export privileges under the Regulations for a 1 The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 774 (2009), The Regulations are issued pursuant to the Export Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), which is currently codified at 50 U.S.C. app. § 2401–2420 (2000). Since August 21, 2001, the EAA has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of August 13, 2009 (74 FR 41,325 (August 14, 2009)), has continued the Regulations in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706 (2000)). VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:47 Sep 08, 2009 Jkt 217001 period often years from the date of Freyer’s conviction. Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered I. Until December 17, 2017, Andrew Ward Freyer with an address at: 54325 Oak I–Jill, La Quinta, CA, 92253, and when acting for or on behalf of Freyer, his representatives, assigns, agents, or employees, (collectively referred to hereinafter as the ‘‘Denied Person’’) may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to: A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License Exception, or export control document; B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations; or C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations. II. No person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item subject to the Regulations; B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to the Regulations that has been exported from the United States; D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the Regulations that PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. III. After notice and opportunity for comment as provided in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation, or business organization related to Andrew Freyer by affiliation, ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of this Order if necessary to prevent evasion of the Order. IV. This Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items involved that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign produced direct product of U.S.-origin technology. V. This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until December 17, 2017. VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Freyer may file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756 of the Regulations. VII. A copy of this Order shall be delivered to Freyer. This Order shall be published in the Federal Register. Issued this 1st day of September 2009. Bernard Kritzer, Director, Office of Exporter Services. [FR Doc. E9–21633 Filed 9–8–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security Action Affecting Export Privileges; Bertrand Lalsingh In the Matter of: Bertrand Lalsingh, 4252 Stirling Rd., Hollywood, FL 33021. Order Denying Export Privileges On February 8, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of Florida, Bertrand Lalsingh (‘‘Lalsingh’’) pled guilty to, and was convicted of, violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 (2000)) (‘‘AECA’’). Lalsingh pled guilty to E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM 09SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 9, 2009 / Notices knowingly and willfully exporting an EOTech 553 Holographic Weapon Sight, an item designated as a ‘‘defense article’’ in Category I of the United States Munitions List, from the United States to Germany, without having first obtained authorization from the Department of State. Lalsingh was sentenced to 5 months prison, 5 months home confinement, 2 years probation, and a $100 special assessment. He was released from prison on August 19, 2008. Section 766.25 of the Export Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or ‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the export privileges of any person who has been convicted of a violation of the [Export Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’)J, the EAR, or any order, license or authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license, or order issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18 U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15 CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. § 24 10(h). The denial of export privileges under this provision may be for a period of up to 10 years from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. app. § 24 10(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of the Regulations states that the Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office of Exporter Services may revoke any Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) licenses previously issued in which the person had an interest in at the time of his conviction. I have received notice of Lalsingh’s conviction for violating the AECA, and have provided notice and an opportunity for Lalsingh to make a written submission to BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of the Regulations. I have not received a submission from Lalsingh. Based upon my review and consultations with BIS’s Office of Export Enforcement, including its cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES 1 The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR Parts 730– 774 (2009). The Regulations are issued pursuant to the Export Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), which is currently codified at 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420 (2000). Since August 21, 2001, the EAA has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of August 13, 2009 (74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009)), has continued the Regulations in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706 (2000)). VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:47 Sep 08, 2009 Jkt 217001 Director, and the facts available to BIS, I have decided to deny Lalsingh’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of five years from the date of Lalsingh’s conviction. I have also decided to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to the Act or Regulations in which Lalsingh had an interest at the time of his conviction. Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered: I. Until February 8, 2013, Bertrand Lalsingh with an address at: 4252 Stirling Rd., Hollywood, FL 33021, and when acting for or on behalf of Lalsingh, his representatives, assigns, agents, or employees, (collectively referred to hereinafter as the ‘‘Denied Person’’) may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to: A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License Exception, or export control document; B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations; or C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations. II. No person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item subject to the Regulations; B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to the Regulations that has been exported from the United States; PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 46417 D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. III. After notice and opportunity for comment as provided in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation, or business organization related to Bertrand Lalsingh by affiliation, ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of this Order if necessary to prevent evasion of the Order. IV. This Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items involved that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign produced direct product of U.S.-origin technology. V. This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until February 8, 2013 VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Lalsingh may file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756 of the Regulations. VII. A copy of this Order shall be delivered to Lalsingh. This Order shall be published in the Federal Register. Issued this 31st day August 2009. Bernard Kritzer, Director, Office of Exporter Services. [FR Doc. E9–21634 Filed 9–8–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM 09SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46416-46417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21634]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Action Affecting Export Privileges; Bertrand Lalsingh

    In the Matter of: Bertrand Lalsingh, 4252 Stirling Rd., 
Hollywood, FL 33021.

Order Denying Export Privileges

    On February 8, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for Southern 
District of Florida, Bertrand Lalsingh (``Lalsingh'') pled guilty to, 
and was convicted of, violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control 
Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 (2000)) (``AECA''). Lalsingh pled guilty to

[[Page 46417]]

knowingly and willfully exporting an EOTech 553 Holographic Weapon 
Sight, an item designated as a ``defense article'' in Category I of the 
United States Munitions List, from the United States to Germany, 
without having first obtained authorization from the Department of 
State. Lalsingh was sentenced to 5 months prison, 5 months home 
confinement, 2 years probation, and a $100 special assessment. He was 
released from prison on August 19, 2008.
    Section 766.25 of the Export Administration Regulations (``EAR'' or 
``Regulations'') \1\ provides, in pertinent part, that ``[t]he Director 
of the Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the Director 
of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the export privileges of 
any person who has been convicted of a violation of the [Export 
Administration Act (``EAA'')J, the EAR, or any order, license or 
authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license, or order 
issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
1701-1706); 18 U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of the Internal 
Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms 
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).'' 15 CFR 766.25(a); see also 
Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. Sec.  24 10(h). The denial of 
export privileges under this provision may be for a period of up to 10 
years from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 
U.S.C. app. Sec.  24 10(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of the 
Regulations states that the Bureau of Industry and Security's Office of 
Exporter Services may revoke any Bureau of Industry and Security 
(``BIS'') licenses previously issued in which the person had an 
interest in at the time of his conviction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of 
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR Parts 730-774 (2009). The Regulations 
are issued pursuant to the Export Administration Act (``EAA''), 
which is currently codified at 50 U.S.C. app. Sec. Sec.  2401-2420 
(2000). Since August 21, 2001, the EAA has been in lapse and the 
President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive 
Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of August 13, 2009 
(74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009)), has continued the Regulations in 
effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 
U.S.C. 1701-1706 (2000)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I have received notice of Lalsingh's conviction for violating the 
AECA, and have provided notice and an opportunity for Lalsingh to make 
a written submission to BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of the 
Regulations. I have not received a submission from Lalsingh. Based upon 
my review and consultations with BIS's Office of Export Enforcement, 
including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, I have decided 
to deny Lalsingh's export privileges under the Regulations for a period 
of five years from the date of Lalsingh's conviction. I have also 
decided to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to the Act or 
Regulations in which Lalsingh had an interest at the time of his 
conviction.

Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered:
    I. Until February 8, 2013, Bertrand Lalsingh with an address at: 
4252 Stirling Rd., Hollywood, FL 33021, and when acting for or on 
behalf of Lalsingh, his representatives, assigns, agents, or employees, 
(collectively referred to hereinafter as the ``Denied Person'') may 
not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction 
involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter 
collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be exported from 
the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other 
activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to:
    A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License 
Exception, or export control document;
    B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, 
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, 
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, 
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the 
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other 
activity subject to the Regulations; or
    C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item 
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to 
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
    II. No person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following:
    A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item 
subject to the Regulations;
    B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted 
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or 
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be 
exported from the United States, including financing or other support 
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires 
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
    C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition 
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to 
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
    D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item 
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the 
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
    E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the 
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States 
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or 
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or 
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any 
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from 
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means 
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
    III. After notice and opportunity for comment as provided in 
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation, 
or business organization related to Bertrand Lalsingh by affiliation, 
ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of 
trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of 
this Order if necessary to prevent evasion of the Order.
    IV. This Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other 
transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items involved 
that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign produced direct 
product of U.S.-origin technology.
    V. This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect 
until February 8, 2013
    VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Lalsingh may 
file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for 
Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the 
date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756 of 
the Regulations.
    VII. A copy of this Order shall be delivered to Lalsingh. This 
Order shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Issued this 31st day August 2009.
Bernard Kritzer,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. E9-21634 Filed 9-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.