Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Petition to List the Eastern Population of the Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus, 46401-46406 [E9-21481]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Electronic Access to This Document
You can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this
Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF), on the Internet
at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/
news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office toll free at 1–888–293–
6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at
(202) 512–1530.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0697; FRL–8948–9]
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1098a.
Delegation of Authority: The Secretary
of Education has delegated authority to
Daniel T. Madzelan, Director,
Forecasting and Policy Analysis for the
Office of Postsecondary Education, to
perform the functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
Dated: September 3, 2009.
Daniel T. Madzelan,
Director, Forecasting and Policy Analysis.
[FR Doc. E9–21695 Filed 9–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS-R4-ES-2009-0029
MO 9221050083-B2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a
Petition to List the Eastern Population
of the Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus
polyphemus) as Threatened
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of 90–day petition
finding and initiation of status review.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce a 90–day
finding on a petition to list the eastern
population of the gopher tortoise
(Gopherus polyphemus) as threatened
under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (Act) and designate
critical habitat. Herein, the Service
refers to the eastern population of the
gopher tortoise as the gopher tortoise in
the eastern portion of its range.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:09 Sep 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
RIN 2060–AP08
Revisions to Test Method for
Determining Stack Gas Velocity Taking
Into Account Velocity Decay Near the
Stack Walls
Correction
In proposed rule document E9–20395
beginning on page 42819 in the issue of
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 make the
following correction:
Appendix A–2 to Part 60
[Corrected]
On page 42819, in Appendix A–2 to
Part 60, Equation 2H–1 is reprinted
correctly to read as set forth below:
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
⎛ p −1 ⎞ 2
1 2
d rem = r − ⎜
⎟ r − rdlast + dlast
p ⎠
2
⎝
[FR Doc. Z9–20395 Filed 9–8–09; 8:45 am]
40 CFR Part 60
Eq. 2H-1
Following a review of the petition, we
find that the petition presents
substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that listing the
gopher tortoise in the eastern portion of
its range may be warranted. Therefore,
with the publication of this notice, we
are initiating a status review to
determine if listing the gopher tortoise
in the eastern portion of the range is
warranted. To ensure that the status
review is comprehensive, we are
soliciting scientific and commercial data
and other information regarding the
status of and threats facing the gopher
tortoise throughout all of its range.
DATES: We made the finding announced
in this document on September 9, 2009.
To allow us adequate time to conduct
this review, we request that we receive
information on or before November 9,
2009 to allow us time to review and
consider the information in our status
review.
ADDRESSES: You may submit
information by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R4ES-2009-0029; Division of Policy and
Directives Management; U.S. Fish and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will post all information received
on https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David L. Hankla, Field Supervisor,
Jacksonville Ecological Services Field
Office, 7915 Baymeadows Way, Suite
200, Jacksonville, FL 32256, by
telephone 904/731-3336, or by facsimile
904/731-3045. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information Solicited
When we make a finding that a
petition presents substantial
information indicating that listing a
species may be warranted, we are
required to promptly commence a
review of the status of the species. To
ensure that the status review is
complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we are soliciting
information concerning the status of the
gopher tortoise throughout all of its
range. We request information from
other concerned governmental agencies,
Native American Tribes, the scientific
community, industry, or any other
interested parties concerning the status
E:\FR\FM\09SEP1.SGM
09SEP1
EP25AU09.003
meeting for three sessions of
approximately five days at roughly
monthly intervals. Meetings will start
on a Monday at 1:00 and end on a
Friday at noon. The committees will
meet in the Washington, DC area. The
dates and locations of these meetings
will be posted on the Department’s Web
site at: https://www.ed.gov/policy/
highered/reg/hearulemaking/2009/
negreg-summerfall.html.
The schedule for these negotiations
has been developed to ensure
publication of the final regulations by
the November 1, 2010 statutory deadline
for publishing Title IV, HEA student
financial assistance final regulations.
46401
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
46402
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules
of the gopher tortoise throughout all of
its range. We are seeking information
regarding:
(1) The species’ biology, range, and
population trends, including:
(a) Habitat requirements for feeding,
breeding, and sheltering;
(b) Genetics and taxonomy of the
gopher tortoise throughout its entire
range including the federally listed
western portion of the gopher tortoise’s
range;
(c) Historical and current range
including distribution patterns;
(d) Historical and current population
levels, and current and projected trends;
and
(e) Past and ongoing conservation
measures for the species or its habitat.
(2) The factors that are the basis for
making a listing determination for a
species under section 4(a) of the Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are:
(a) The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of the species’ habitat or
range;
(b) Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes;
(c) Disease or predation;
(d) The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or
(e) Other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence and
threats to the species or its habitat.
(3) Information related to whether any
portion of the range should be
considered for listing as a distinct
population segment or significant
portion of the range.
If we determine that listing the gopher
tortoise in the eastern portion of its
range is warranted, it may be
appropriate, at the same time, to
propose critical habitat to the maximum
extent prudent and determinable at the
time we propose to list the species.
Therefore, with regard to areas within
the geographical range currently
occupied by the gopher tortoise range
wide we also request data and
information on what may constitute
physical or biological features essential
to the conservation of the species, where
these features are currently found, and
whether any of these features may
require special management
considerations or protection. In
addition, we request data and
information regarding whether there are
areas outside the geographical area
occupied by the species that are
essential to the conservation of the
species. Please provide specific
comments and information as to what,
if any, critical habitat you think we
should propose for designation if the
species is proposed for listing, and why
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:09 Sep 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
such habitat meets the requirements of
the Act. Include sufficient information
with your submission (such as full
references) to allow us to verify any
scientific or commercial information
you provide.
Submissions merely stating support
for or opposition to the action under
consideration without providing
supporting information, although noted,
will not be considered in making a
determination. Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the
Act directs that determinations as to
whether any species is a threatened or
endangered species must be made
‘‘solely on the basis of the best scientific
and commercial data available.’’ Based
on the status review, we will issue a 12–
month finding on the petition, as
provided in section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act.
You may submit your information
concerning this status review by one of
the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. If you submit information via
https://www.regulations.gov, your entire
submission—including any personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the Web site. If you submit a
hardcopy that includes personal
identifying information, you may
request at the top of your document that
we withhold this personal identifying
information from public review.
However, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so. We will post all
hardcopy submissions on https://
www.regulations.gov.
Information and materials we
received and used in preparing this 90–
day finding will be available for you to
review at https://www.regulations.govor
you may make an appointment during
normal business hours at the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Jacksonville
Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
that would lead a reasonable person to
believe that the measure proposed in the
petition may be warranted’’ (50 CFR
424.14(b)). If we find that substantial
scientific or commercial information
was presented, we are required to
promptly commence a status review of
the species which we subsequently
summarize in our 12–month finding.
On January 18, 2006, we received a
petition, dated January 13, 2006, from
Save Our Big Scrub, Inc. and Wild
South requesting that we list the gopher
tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) in the
eastern portion of its range as a
threatened species under the Act and
we designate critical habitat. The
petition clearly identified itself as such
and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioners, as
required in 50 CFR 424.14(a). Action on
this petition was precluded by court
orders and settlement agreements for
other listing and critical habitat actions
that required all of our listing and
critical habitat funding for fiscal year
2006. On September 26, 2006, we
received a 60–day notice of intent to sue
from Save Our Big Scrub, Inc. and Wild
South for failing to make a timely 90–
day finding. This notice constitutes our
90–day finding on the petition to list the
gopher tortoise in the eastern portion of
its range.
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires
that we make a finding on whether a
petition to list, delist, or reclassify a
species presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that
the petitioned action may be warranted.
We are to base this finding on
information provided in the petition,
supporting information submitted with
the petition, and information otherwise
available in our files. To the maximum
extent practicable, we are to make this
finding within 90 days of our receipt of
the petition, and publish our notice of
the finding promptly in the Federal
Register.
Our standard for ‘‘substantial
scientific or commercial information’’
within the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) with regard to a 90–day petition
finding is ‘‘that amount of information
Species Information
The gopher tortoise was first
described in 1802 by F.M. Daudin. It is
the only tortoise indigenous to the
southeastern United States (U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service 1990, p. 1). The
gopher tortoise is a moderate-sized,
terrestrial turtle, averaging 23 to 28
centimeters (cm) (9 to 11 inches (in)) in
length. The species is identified by its
stumpy, elephantine hind feet and
flattened, shovel-like forelimbs. The
shell is oblong and generally tan, brown,
or gray in coloration.
The gopher tortoise typically inhabits
relatively well-drained, sandy soils.
This species is generally associated with
longleaf pine (Pinus palustris)– xeric
oak (Quercus spp.) sandhills but also
occurs in scrub, xeric hammock, pine
flatwoods, dry prairie, coastal
grasslands and dunes, mixed hardwood-
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Previous Federal Action(s)
On July 7, 1987 (52 FR 25376), the
Service determined the western
population of the gopher tortoise to be
a threatened species. This population
occurs from the Tombigbee and Mobile
Rivers in Alabama west to southeastern
Louisiana. To date, no Federal actions
have been taken with regard to the
gopher tortoise in the eastern portion of
its range.
E:\FR\FM\09SEP1.SGM
09SEP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules
pine communities, and a variety of
disturbed habitats (Auffenberg and
Franz 1982, p. 98; Kushlan and Mazzotti
1984, pp. 231-232; Diemer 1987, pp. 7374; Diemer 1992; pp. 163-164;
Breininger et al. 1994, pp. 60 and 63).
Gopher tortoises excavate burrows that
average 0.91 to 15.8 meters (m) (3 to 52
feet (ft)) in length and 2.7 to 7.0 m (9
to 23 ft) in depth (Ashton and Ashton
2004, p. 15). These burrows, which
provide protection from temperature
extremes, desiccation, and predators,
serve as refuges for approximately 360
other species (Cox et al. 1987, p. 11;
Jackson and Milstrey 1989, pp. 86-87;
Witz et al. 1991, p. 152).
The gopher tortoise is slow to reach
sexual maturity, has low fecundity, and
has a long life span (Cox et al. 1987, p.
17). Females reach sexual maturity at 9
to 21 years of age, depending on local
resource abundance and latitude; males
mature at a slightly younger age
(Mushinsky et al. 1994, p. 352; Aresco
and Guyer 1999, pp. 503-504). The
breeding season is generally April to
November. Nests are constructed (often
in burrow mounds) from mid-May to
mid-June, and only one clutch is
produced annually (Iverson 1980, p.
356). Incubation periods range from 80
to 90 days in northern Florida (Iverson
1980, p. 356) to 110 days in South
Carolina, the northern limit of the
gopher tortoise’s range (Wright 1982, p.
68). Predation of nests and hatchlings is
a major factor affecting population
dynamics (Diemer 1994, pp. 134-135;
Alford 1980, p. 180; Butler and Sowell
1996, pp. 455-457).
Gopher tortoises feed primarily on
broadleaf grasses, wiregrass (Aristida
stricta var. beyrichiana), asters, peas and
beans, and fruit, but they are known to
eat more than 300 species of plants
(Ashton and Ashton 2004, pp. 33-35).
Home range size varies with habitat
type, season, and sex of the tortoise;
moreover, considerable individual
variation has been found (Diemer 1992,
pp. 160-162). Reported annual average
home ranges for males have varied from
0.5 to 1.9 hectares (ha) (1.2 to 4.7 acres
(ac)). Females generally have smaller
home ranges, with reported averages
ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 ha (0.2 to 1.6 ac)
(McRae et al. 1981, pp. 174-176; Diemer
1992, pp. 160-161; Smith et al. 1997, pp.
359-361). Home range size is inversely
correlated with the amount of
herbaceous ground cover and the range
may vary depending on habitat quality
(Diemer 1992, p. 163). Multiple burrows
are typically used (McRae et al. 1981, p.
165; Diemer 1992, p. 162), which
complicates estimates of population size
(McCoy and Mushinsky 1992, p. 402).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:09 Sep 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
The gopher tortoise is endemic to the
United States and occurs in the
southeastern Coastal Plain from
southeastern South Carolina to extreme
southeastern Louisiana (Auffenberg and
Franz 1982, p. 95). The eastern portion
of the gopher tortoise’s range includes
Alabama (east of the Tombigbee and
Mobile Rivers), Florida, Georgia, and
South Carolina. Of the eastern portion of
the tortoise’s range, the northernmost
part is in South Carolina; in that State,
four disjunct populations remain in
Jasper County, a few tortoises occur in
southern Hampton County (Wright
1982, p. 14), and tortoises have recently
been documented in Aiken County
(Clark 2001, p. 191). In Georgia, the
largest number of tortoises is found
along the western Fall Line Sand Hills
and the central Tifton Uplands. Along
the Coastal Plain of Georgia, most of the
tortoises are scattered due to
urbanization along the coast, which
further isolates tortoises from one
another (Landers and Garner 1981, pp.
46-47). Tortoises found farther inland in
rural areas also tend to be scattered due
to lack of management, such as
prescribed burning. The State of Florida
contains the largest portion of the total
global range of the species. Gopher
tortoises remain widely distributed in
Florida, occurring in parts of all 67
counties; however, their current range
in south Florida is restricted due to
unsuitable habitat and increased
urbanization (Diemer 1987, p. 73).
Tortoises occur as far south as Cape
Sable and on islands off the east and
west coasts of Florida (Auffenberg and
Franz 1982, p. 99; Kushlan and Mazzotti
1984, p. 231).
Applicability of the Act to the Eastern
Portion of its Range
Section 3 of the Act defines ‘‘species’’
to include ‘‘any subspecies of fish or
wildlife or plants, and any distinct
population segment [DPS] of any
species of vertebrate fish or wildlife
which interbreeds when mature,’’ and
an ‘‘endangered species’’ as ‘‘any
species which is in danger of extinction
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range.’’ (A ‘‘threatened species’’ is
‘‘any species which is likely to become
an endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range).’’ As a
result, we make listing decisions on
entire species or subspecies which may
be threatened or endangered throughout
all or a significant portion or their range,
and on DPSs of vertebrate animals (see
our Policy Regarding the Recognition of
Distinct Vertebrate Population Segments
Under the Endangered Species Act (61
FR 4722, February 7, 1996) for
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
46403
information on how we define and
identify DPSs). If we recognize a
population as a DPS, it is listed if we
find it is threatened or endangered
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range.
If we find the gopher tortoise is
threatened in the eastern portion of the
range, it may be appropriate to list the
entire species as threatened (because it
is already listed as threatened in the
western portion of the range).
Alternatively, we may determine that a
DPS of the gopher tortoise inhabits the
eastern portion of the range, and we
may make a listing determination for
that DPS.
The petition and information in our
files suggest that the eastern portion of
the gopher tortoise’s range contains the
majority of the total global range of the
species. This indicates that the eastern
portion of the range may be a significant
portion of the range of the species, or,
if discrete from the remainder of the
range, a distinct population segment of
the species. See the Service’s Policy
Regarding the Recognition of Distinct
Vertebrate Population Segments under
the Endangered Species Act (61 FR
4722, February 7, 1996).
Therefore, we find that the petition
presents substantial information that the
eastern portion of the range of the
gopher tortoise may, if threatened or
endangered, be an appropriate subject of
a listing rule, and that a range-wide
review of its status is warranted.
Evaluation of Information for this
Finding
Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533)
and its implementing regulations at 50
CFR 424 set forth the procedures for
adding species to the Federal Lists of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants. A species may be
determined to be an endangered or
threatened species due to one or more
of the five factors described in section
4(a)(1) of the Act: (A) The present or
threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range; (B)
overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D)
the inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; or (E) other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued
existence.
In making this 90–day finding, we
evaluated whether information
regarding the gopher tortoise in the
eastern portion of its range, as presented
in the petition and other information
available in our files, is substantial,
thereby indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted. Our
E:\FR\FM\09SEP1.SGM
09SEP1
46404
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
evaluation of this information is
presented below.
A. The Present or Threatened
Destruction, Modification, or
Curtailment of the Species’ Habitat or
Range
The petition states that within the
eastern portion of the range of the
gopher tortoise, land for urban uses
(urban development) has increased by
approximately 614 percent, which is
higher than in areas where the federally
listed western population occurs (483
percent increase) (Vesterby and Krupa
1997, pp. 44-45). Based on the
document cited in the petition, it is
unclear how the petitioners reach this
conclusion. Although the information
has shown an increase in urban use
throughout the southeastern United
States, it does not show that this
conversion to urban use has occurred in
areas occupied by gopher tortoises.
However, information in our files
indicates that conversion of natural pine
stands for urban uses can and does have
detrimental effects, caused by loss of
habitat, on populations of gopher
tortoises. Based on GIS analysis of 2003
Landsat imagery, an estimated 688,963
ha (1,701,736 ac) of former tortoise
habitat in Florida are now urban, which
represents a 15.7 percent loss of
historical tortoise habitat to
urbanization (FWC 2006, p. 8).
The petition also notes that between
1952 and 1999, natural pine habitat
declined by more than 61 percent
within the eastern portion of the gopher
tortoise’s range. The 61 percent decline
is a greater decline than the 41 percent
in areas occupied by the federally listed
western population (Conner and
Hartsell 2002, pp. 374-375).
Furthermore, the petition states that the
amount of land devoted to pine
plantations has increased from 567,000
ha (1.4 million ac) in 1952 to nearly 8.91
million ha (22 million ac) in 1999, an
increase of more than 1,400 percent
(Conner and Hartsell 2002, pp. 373-376).
Information in our files indicates that
loss of natural pine stands converted to
pine plantations has an adverse effect
on gopher tortoise populations
(Auffenberg and Franz 1982, p. 102).
Pine plantations are typically planted in
dense rows of pine trees. The resulting
open, grassy habitat may encourage
colonization for several years. Such
colonies are short-lived, however, for
within l0 to l5 years, the pines shade
out the grasses, and the tortoises either
die or scatter (Auffenberg and Franz
1982, p. 111).
Natural pine stands tend to have an
open canopy that allows for greater light
intensity at ground level and a diversity
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:09 Sep 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
of grasses and forbs that the tortoises
eat. Pine plantations tend to have a
dense overstory, which results in a
sparse surface flora and lack of foraging
vegetation for tortoises (Auffenberg and
Franz 1982, p. 102). Conversion to pine
plantations results in poor habitat
quality and smaller populations of
gopher tortoises. Based on the
information provided in the petition
and information in our files, there is a
trend showing an increase in planted
pine and a decrease in natural pine that
could be detrimental to gopher tortoises
throughout the eastern portion of their
range.
Included in the petition is a quote
from the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission (FWC) that,
‘‘it may be inevitable that gopher
tortoises will be largely eliminated from
private lands in Florida within the next
three generations, which would
represent a 60-65 percent decline in
tortoise habitat. We anticipate similar
losses in the other range states,’’ (FWC
2001, p. 5). Kautz (1998, p. 184) projects
that natural pine forests could disappear
from all commercial forest lands in
Florida by 2021. Kautz (1998, p. 182)
also estimates that between 1970 and
1995, natural pine forests in Florida
declined from 2.26 million ha (5.58
million ac) to 1.14 million ha (2.82
million ac), a 49.4 percent loss in
approximately one tortoise generation
(31 years). In other States where gopher
tortoises occur, human population
growth has not increased as it has in
Florida over the last 50 years, but
prospects for loss of natural pine forests
in these other States are no less bleak
(FWC 2001, p. 5).
The loss of natural pinelands
throughout the South is further
supported by Siry (2002, p. 335), who
stated that in 2000, natural pine made
up 11 percent of the forest industry’s
land holdings throughout the southern
United States; but by 2020, only a
predicted 2 percent of the forest
industry’s land holdings will be in
natural pine. Siry (2002, p. 335) also
showed that in 2000, natural pine
consisted of 14 percent of nonindustrial
private forest holdings, whereas by
2020, only 10 percent is predicted to be
left in natural pine. This information,
which was cited in the petition, is
supported by information found in our
files. FWC’s 2006 update to the species’
2001 status report further indicates a
serious decline in the amount of gopher
tortoise habitat in the State of Florida.
The petition also contends that the
increase in habitat destruction and
degradation of upland habitats has
resulted in fragmentation of large
tortoise populations and forced
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
individuals into unsuitable habitats and
onto highways (Wilson 1997, p. 18). The
petitioners’ rationale is that as the
quality of isolated patches of gopher
tortoise habitat is degraded, mature
adults may be forced to abandon a site
in search of better quality habitat and
food. This could force the tortoises into
urban areas where food and habitat are
scarce. According to FWC (2001, p. 4),
gopher tortoises left areas that had been
recently converted to pine plantations.
Dense pines shade out understory forage
plants causing the tortoises to move to
peripheral areas to find food.
These peripheral areas are often road
shoulders, which may give the
impression that population numbers are
high, even though the adjacent pine
plantation is largely unoccupied (FWC
2001, p. 4). This claim is supported by
information in our files. Roads fragment
gopher tortoise habitat and populations,
and proper management of these small
habitat fragments (e.g., prescribed
burning, invasive species control)
becomes complicated (FWC 2006, p.
10). Highway mortality of gopher
tortoises is probably greatest in urban
areas with heavy vehicular traffic and a
relatively high number of displaced
tortoises (Mushinsky et al. 2006, p. 362).
The Service’s 1990 Gopher Tortoise
Recovery Plan for the western portion of
the gopher tortoise’s range discusses the
conversion of natural pine habitat to
other uses and describes similar effects
that are also occurring within the
eastern portion of the gopher tortoise’s
range (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
1990, p. 9). Since this recovery plan was
written, other researchers have supplied
evidence that fire suppression and the
decline of prescribed fire in both natural
pine forests and pine plantations have
resulted in a substantial decline in
gopher tortoise habitat (FWC 2006, p.
10). Auffenburg and Franz (1982, p. 106)
reported that tortoise densities are
highest in fire-adapted associations
(sand pine-scrub oak and longleaf pineoak) or early successional stages (beach
scrub and old-field). In the absence of
fire, each of these associations would
eventually be replaced by
predominantly evergreen hardwood
communities, in which tortoises are
generally less abundant (Auffenburg and
Franz 1982, pp. 106-107).
In summary, we find that the
information provided in the petition, as
well as other information in our files,
presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that
the petitioned action may be warranted
due to habitat destruction (especially
from urbanization and the conversion of
natural pine habitat to pine plantations)
E:\FR\FM\09SEP1.SGM
09SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
and fire suppression in natural pine
forests.
B. Overutilization for Commercial,
Recreational, Scientific, or Educational
Purposes
The petition states that harvesting of
gopher tortoises is now prohibited by all
States throughout its range; however,
commercial hunters continue to illegally
collect gopher tortoises for their meat
(Puckett and Franz 2001, p. 6). The
petitioners note that in Florida there has
been a long history of human predation
on tortoises, especially in the western
Panhandle. For example, prior to the
closure of tortoise harvest in the late
1980s, one community in Okaloosa
County held an annual tortoise cookout
(FWC 2006, p. 4). Auffenberg and Franz
(1982, p. 103) found that tortoise
populations in longleaf pine-turkey oak
(Quercus laevis) habitat in the Florida
Panhandle averaged only 20 percent of
the density of populations in similar
habitat in the peninsula of Florida.
Although the petition provides some
information about human predation on
tortoises in the Florida Panhandle, it
does not present information on human
predation in other areas of Florida or
elsewhere in the eastern portion of the
range. However, information in our files
indicates that the tortoise was used for
food throughout its range during the
1930s (‘‘Great Depression’’) and as late
as the 1980s in some parts of the range.
Although this activity may have abated,
the taking of adult gopher tortoises can
result in long-term negative effects on
populations. Since tortoises already
have high juvenile and hatchling
mortality, require a long time to reach
sexual maturity, and have a low
reproductive rate, populations can show
substantial effects from the loss of
reproducing adults.
The petition also provides
information indicating that other human
activities focused on other species
negatively affect gopher tortoises. For
example, although ‘‘rattlesnake roundups’’ have decreased throughout the
gopher tortoise’s range, they are still
occurring in South Georgia (Humane
Society of the United States 2005, p. 1).
Collection methods for these round-ups
include pouring gasoline into snakes’
hiding places, which include gopher
tortoise burrows. The petitioners note
that Florida has banned the use of
gasoline to collect rattlesnakes from
gopher tortoise burrows (Florida
Administrative Code, 68A-4.001(2)) and
has banned tortoise races (Florida
Administrative Code, 68A-25.002(9) and
(10)). However, these activities persist
in other States such as Georgia and
Alabama.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:01 Sep 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
The petition also contends that past
gopher tortoise harvesting during
rattlesnake roundups would most likely
explain why tortoises are absent from
some seemingly appropriate habitat
(Hermann 2002, p. 295). We have
evidence in our files indicating this
activity did occur, at least historically.
As stated previously, some activities,
although historical in nature, may have
lasting effects on populations, but the
magnitude of these effects is unknown
at this time.
In summary, the petition provides
information on the impacts of past and
present commercial and recreational
activities on tortoises. However, it is
difficult to determine from either the
information submitted with the petition
or the information in our files the
current and projected extent and
magnitude of these impacts on the
gopher tortoise throughout all or a
significant portion of its eastern range.
Therefore, we find that the petition does
not present substantial information for
this factor.
C. Disease or Predation
The petitioners provide information
that the bacterial disease known as
upper respiratory tract disease (URTD)
has become more widespread among
gopher tortoises (Seigel 2003, p. 138).
This disease is highly contagious and is
transmitted by close contact between
tortoises, as during courtship or male
combat (Mushinsky et al. 2006, p. 363).
Symptoms of URTD can include
swollen eyelids, nasal discharge, and
severe respiratory distress (Seigel 2003,
p. 139). The petition also includes
information regarding the large-scale
mortality of tortoises from URTD at
several sites in Florida, including the
unusually high mortality at the Kennedy
Space Center between 1995 and 2000
(Seigel 2003, pp. 138-139). Data show
that tortoises of both genders and all age
classes at the Kennedy Space Center
were equally vulnerable to URTDrelated mortality and that an ‘‘across the
board’’ decrease in tortoise numbers
could be expected (Seigel 2003, p. 142).
Although URTD can result in large-scale
mortality of gopher tortoises, the
petition does not provide information
on the extent of this disease on the
gopher tortoise in the eastern portion of
its range. Information within our files
indicates that URTD has the potential to
influence survival and reproduction of
individual tortoises, but definitive data
are lacking (Brown et al. 2002, pp. 505506); therefore, the current extent of the
impact of this disease is difficult to
determine within the eastern portion of
the gopher tortoise’s range.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
46405
The petition also includes
information indicating that predators
pose a significant threat to gopher
tortoise population viability. The
petition states that because of high nest
loss to predators, a mature gopher
tortoise may produce as few as one
clutch every 10 years that actually
survives. Predators destroy more than
80 percent of gopher tortoise nests
(Puckett and Franz 2001, p. 5). In South
Carolina, 17 of 24 (74 percent) nests
were destroyed by predators (Wright
1982, p. 59). In Georgia, females are
estimated to produce one clutch
(approximately seven eggs per clutch in
southern Georgia) annually; however,
predators will destroy 87 percent of
these clutches throughout that year
(Landers and Garner 1981, p. 46). In
northern Florida, gopher tortoises have
been estimated to have a mortality rate
of 94.2 percent during their first year of
life (Alford 1980, p. 180).
Epperson and Heise (2003, pp. 320
and 322) showed in their study that
survivorship of tortoise hatchlings was
low with most (65 percent) killed within
30 days of hatching. Information in our
files indicates that the most significant
egg and hatchling predator appears to be
the raccoon (Procyon lotor) (Landers et
al. 1980, p. 358); however, a variety of
mammals are reported predators of
gopher tortoise, including gray foxes
(Urocyon cinereoargenteus), striped
skunks (Mephitis mephitis), opossums
(Didelphis virginiana), armadillos
(Dasypus novemcinctus) (Landers et al.
1980, p. 358), and dogs (Canis
domesticus) (Causey and Cude 1978, pp.
94-95). Introduced nonnative fire ants
(Solenopsis saevissima or invicta) are
also reported as hatchling predators
(Landers et al. 1980, p. 358; Lohoefener
and Lohmeier 1984, p. 5).
Although disease and predation have
resulted in the loss of gopher tortoises,
the petition and information in our files
do not provide sufficient information to
show the extent to which these threats
have affected or are expected to affect
the gopher tortoise throughout all or a
significant portion of its eastern range.
Therefore, we find that the petition does
not present substantial information for
this factor. We will further review the
role of disease and predation during our
status review.
D. Inadequacy of Existing Regulatory
Mechanisms
The petition asserts that although
each State affords some protection to
gopher tortoise in the eastern portion of
its range, such State protections have
been ineffective at preventing further
declines. In Alabama, the tortoise is a
State-protected nongame species; in
E:\FR\FM\09SEP1.SGM
09SEP1
46406
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules
South Carolina, the species is listed as
endangered; and in Georgia and Florida,
the species is listed as threatened.
In Florida, permits are required to
take gopher tortoises (Florida
Administrative Code, 68A-25.002 (9)
and (10)). The petition claims that since
1991, the permitting process used by the
State of Florida has issued permits to
‘‘entomb and kill’’ an estimated 67,000
to 71,000 gopher tortoises for the
construction of houses, strip malls,
roads, and schools (Fleshler 2005, p. 1).
However, the State of Florida’s first
action is to prevent direct harm to
tortoises through its permitting process.
According to information in our files, at
the time the petition was received, the
FWC had a draft 2006 Management Plan
to protect suitable habitat and relocate
tortoises to this habitat. The extent of
the impacts from relocation, either
positive or negative, on this species
throughout the eastern portion of the
range is currently unknown. We will
evaluate this during the status review.
The information presented in the
petition, as well as information in our
files, does not present substantial
information for this factor. Therefore,
we have determined that the petition
does not present substantial information
that the gopher tortoise throughout all
or a significant portion of its eastern
range may be threatened due to the
inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms. We will continue to
evaluate this factor, including the longterm monitoring program of gopher
tortoise translocation as described in the
FWC draft 2006 Management Plan,
during our status review of the gopher
tortoise in the eastern portion of its
range.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Other Natural or Manmade Factors
Affecting the Species’ Continued
Existence
The petition states that the previously
identified threats are accentuated by the
length of time required for gopher
tortoises to reach sexual maturity and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:01 Sep 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
their low reproductive rate. The petition
further states that the Service used this
claim as one of the justifications for
listing the gopher tortoise in the western
portion of its range as threatened in
1987 (52 FR 25376, July 7, 1987). The
petitioners contend that this same
rationale applies to the eastern portion
of the range because the threats are
similar to what the western portion of
the range was facing at the time of
listing. As described under the Species
Information section above, female
gopher tortoises do not reach sexual
maturity until about 9 to 21 years of age;
males mature at a slightly younger age
(Cox et al. 1987, p. 17; Mushinsky et al.
1994, p. 352; Aresco and Guyer 1999,
pp. 503-504). As described above,
because of the natural life history
parameters of the gopher tortoise,
including low reproductive rate and
delayed age to sexual maturity, the
mortality experienced by other threats
can be amplified within populations.
Therefore, we find that the information
provided in the petition, as well as
information in our files, presents
substantial information indicating that
the petitioned action may be warranted
under this factor due to the natural life
history of gopher tortoises.
Finding
On the basis of our review and
evaluation under section 4(b)(3)(A) of
the Act, we find that the petition
presents substantial scientific or
commercial information that listing the
gopher tortoise to include the eastern
portion of its range may be warranted
due to current and future threats under
Factors A and E. Therefore, we are
initiating a status review to determine
whether listing the eastern population
of the gopher tortoise is warranted. To
ensure that the status review is
comprehensive (in conjunction with the
status review we are conducting under
the Act’s section 4(c)(2) of the listed
western portion of the range), we are
soliciting scientific and commercial data
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and other information regarding listing
the gopher tortoise throughout all of its
range. At the conclusion of the status
review, we will issue a 12–month
finding on the petition, announcing our
determination of whether or not the
petitioned action is warranted.
The ‘‘substantial information’’
standard for a 90–day finding differs
from the Act’s ‘‘best scientific and
commercial data’’ standard that applies
to a status review to determine whether
a petitioned action is warranted. A 90–
day finding does not constitute a status
review under the Act. In a 12–month
finding, we will determine whether a
petitioned action is warranted after we
have completed a thorough status
review of the species, which is
conducted following a substantial 90–
day finding. Because the Act’s standards
for 90–day and 12–month findings are
different, as described above, a
substantial 90–day finding does not
mean that the 12–month finding will
result in a warranted finding.
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited
is available on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov and upon request
from the Jacksonville Ecological
Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Author
The primary authors of this notice are
the staff members of the Jacksonville
Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: August 24, 2009.
Daniel M. Ashe,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–21481 Filed 9–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–S
E:\FR\FM\09SEP1.SGM
09SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 9, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46401-46406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21481]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS-R4-ES-2009-0029
MO 9221050083-B2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding on
a Petition to List the Eastern Population of the Gopher Tortoise
(Gopherus polyphemus) as Threatened
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of 90-day petition finding and initiation of status
review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce a 90-day
finding on a petition to list the eastern population of the gopher
tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) as threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act) and designate critical habitat.
Herein, the Service refers to the eastern population of the gopher
tortoise as the gopher tortoise in the eastern portion of its range.
Following a review of the petition, we find that the petition presents
substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that
listing the gopher tortoise in the eastern portion of its range may be
warranted. Therefore, with the publication of this notice, we are
initiating a status review to determine if listing the gopher tortoise
in the eastern portion of the range is warranted. To ensure that the
status review is comprehensive, we are soliciting scientific and
commercial data and other information regarding the status of and
threats facing the gopher tortoise throughout all of its range.
DATES: We made the finding announced in this document on September 9,
2009. To allow us adequate time to conduct this review, we request that
we receive information on or before November 9, 2009 to allow us time
to review and consider the information in our status review.
ADDRESSES: You may submit information by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing,
Attn: FWS-R4-ES-2009-0029; Division of Policy and Directives
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will post all information received on https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David L. Hankla, Field Supervisor,
Jacksonville Ecological Services Field Office, 7915 Baymeadows Way,
Suite 200, Jacksonville, FL 32256, by telephone 904/731-3336, or by
facsimile 904/731-3045. Persons who use a telecommunications device for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information Solicited
When we make a finding that a petition presents substantial
information indicating that listing a species may be warranted, we are
required to promptly commence a review of the status of the species. To
ensure that the status review is complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial information, we are soliciting
information concerning the status of the gopher tortoise throughout all
of its range. We request information from other concerned governmental
agencies, Native American Tribes, the scientific community, industry,
or any other interested parties concerning the status
[[Page 46402]]
of the gopher tortoise throughout all of its range. We are seeking
information regarding:
(1) The species' biology, range, and population trends, including:
(a) Habitat requirements for feeding, breeding, and sheltering;
(b) Genetics and taxonomy of the gopher tortoise throughout its
entire range including the federally listed western portion of the
gopher tortoise's range;
(c) Historical and current range including distribution patterns;
(d) Historical and current population levels, and current and
projected trends; and
(e) Past and ongoing conservation measures for the species or its
habitat.
(2) The factors that are the basis for making a listing
determination for a species under section 4(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.), which are:
(a) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of the species' habitat or range;
(b) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes;
(c) Disease or predation;
(d) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
(e) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued
existence and threats to the species or its habitat.
(3) Information related to whether any portion of the range should
be considered for listing as a distinct population segment or
significant portion of the range.
If we determine that listing the gopher tortoise in the eastern
portion of its range is warranted, it may be appropriate, at the same
time, to propose critical habitat to the maximum extent prudent and
determinable at the time we propose to list the species. Therefore,
with regard to areas within the geographical range currently occupied
by the gopher tortoise range wide we also request data and information
on what may constitute physical or biological features essential to the
conservation of the species, where these features are currently found,
and whether any of these features may require special management
considerations or protection. In addition, we request data and
information regarding whether there are areas outside the geographical
area occupied by the species that are essential to the conservation of
the species. Please provide specific comments and information as to
what, if any, critical habitat you think we should propose for
designation if the species is proposed for listing, and why such
habitat meets the requirements of the Act. Include sufficient
information with your submission (such as full references) to allow us
to verify any scientific or commercial information you provide.
Submissions merely stating support for or opposition to the action
under consideration without providing supporting information, although
noted, will not be considered in making a determination. Section
4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that determinations as to whether any
species is a threatened or endangered species must be made ``solely on
the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available.'' Based
on the status review, we will issue a 12-month finding on the petition,
as provided in section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act.
You may submit your information concerning this status review by
one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. If you submit
information via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire submission--
including any personal identifying information--will be posted on the
Web site. If you submit a hardcopy that includes personal identifying
information, you may request at the top of your document that we
withhold this personal identifying information from public review.
However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will
post all hardcopy submissions on https://www.regulations.gov.
Information and materials we received and used in preparing this
90-day finding will be available for you to review at https://www.regulations.govor you may make an appointment during normal
business hours at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Jacksonville
Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires that we make a finding on
whether a petition to list, delist, or reclassify a species presents
substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the
petitioned action may be warranted. We are to base this finding on
information provided in the petition, supporting information submitted
with the petition, and information otherwise available in our files. To
the maximum extent practicable, we are to make this finding within 90
days of our receipt of the petition, and publish our notice of the
finding promptly in the Federal Register.
Our standard for ``substantial scientific or commercial
information'' within the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) with regard
to a 90-day petition finding is ``that amount of information that would
lead a reasonable person to believe that the measure proposed in the
petition may be warranted'' (50 CFR 424.14(b)). If we find that
substantial scientific or commercial information was presented, we are
required to promptly commence a status review of the species which we
subsequently summarize in our 12-month finding.
On January 18, 2006, we received a petition, dated January 13,
2006, from Save Our Big Scrub, Inc. and Wild South requesting that we
list the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) in the eastern portion
of its range as a threatened species under the Act and we designate
critical habitat. The petition clearly identified itself as such and
included the requisite identification information for the petitioners,
as required in 50 CFR 424.14(a). Action on this petition was precluded
by court orders and settlement agreements for other listing and
critical habitat actions that required all of our listing and critical
habitat funding for fiscal year 2006. On September 26, 2006, we
received a 60-day notice of intent to sue from Save Our Big Scrub, Inc.
and Wild South for failing to make a timely 90-day finding. This notice
constitutes our 90-day finding on the petition to list the gopher
tortoise in the eastern portion of its range.
Previous Federal Action(s)
On July 7, 1987 (52 FR 25376), the Service determined the western
population of the gopher tortoise to be a threatened species. This
population occurs from the Tombigbee and Mobile Rivers in Alabama west
to southeastern Louisiana. To date, no Federal actions have been taken
with regard to the gopher tortoise in the eastern portion of its range.
Species Information
The gopher tortoise was first described in 1802 by F.M. Daudin. It
is the only tortoise indigenous to the southeastern United States (U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service 1990, p. 1). The gopher tortoise is a
moderate-sized, terrestrial turtle, averaging 23 to 28 centimeters (cm)
(9 to 11 inches (in)) in length. The species is identified by its
stumpy, elephantine hind feet and flattened, shovel-like forelimbs. The
shell is oblong and generally tan, brown, or gray in coloration.
The gopher tortoise typically inhabits relatively well-drained,
sandy soils. This species is generally associated with longleaf pine
(Pinus palustris)- xeric oak (Quercus spp.) sandhills but also occurs
in scrub, xeric hammock, pine flatwoods, dry prairie, coastal
grasslands and dunes, mixed hardwood-
[[Page 46403]]
pine communities, and a variety of disturbed habitats (Auffenberg and
Franz 1982, p. 98; Kushlan and Mazzotti 1984, pp. 231-232; Diemer 1987,
pp. 73-74; Diemer 1992; pp. 163-164; Breininger et al. 1994, pp. 60 and
63). Gopher tortoises excavate burrows that average 0.91 to 15.8 meters
(m) (3 to 52 feet (ft)) in length and 2.7 to 7.0 m (9 to 23 ft) in
depth (Ashton and Ashton 2004, p. 15). These burrows, which provide
protection from temperature extremes, desiccation, and predators, serve
as refuges for approximately 360 other species (Cox et al. 1987, p. 11;
Jackson and Milstrey 1989, pp. 86-87; Witz et al. 1991, p. 152).
The gopher tortoise is slow to reach sexual maturity, has low
fecundity, and has a long life span (Cox et al. 1987, p. 17). Females
reach sexual maturity at 9 to 21 years of age, depending on local
resource abundance and latitude; males mature at a slightly younger age
(Mushinsky et al. 1994, p. 352; Aresco and Guyer 1999, pp. 503-504).
The breeding season is generally April to November. Nests are
constructed (often in burrow mounds) from mid-May to mid-June, and only
one clutch is produced annually (Iverson 1980, p. 356). Incubation
periods range from 80 to 90 days in northern Florida (Iverson 1980, p.
356) to 110 days in South Carolina, the northern limit of the gopher
tortoise's range (Wright 1982, p. 68). Predation of nests and
hatchlings is a major factor affecting population dynamics (Diemer
1994, pp. 134-135; Alford 1980, p. 180; Butler and Sowell 1996, pp.
455-457).
Gopher tortoises feed primarily on broadleaf grasses, wiregrass
(Aristida stricta var. beyrichiana), asters, peas and beans, and fruit,
but they are known to eat more than 300 species of plants (Ashton and
Ashton 2004, pp. 33-35). Home range size varies with habitat type,
season, and sex of the tortoise; moreover, considerable individual
variation has been found (Diemer 1992, pp. 160-162). Reported annual
average home ranges for males have varied from 0.5 to 1.9 hectares (ha)
(1.2 to 4.7 acres (ac)). Females generally have smaller home ranges,
with reported averages ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 ha (0.2 to 1.6 ac)
(McRae et al. 1981, pp. 174-176; Diemer 1992, pp. 160-161; Smith et al.
1997, pp. 359-361). Home range size is inversely correlated with the
amount of herbaceous ground cover and the range may vary depending on
habitat quality (Diemer 1992, p. 163). Multiple burrows are typically
used (McRae et al. 1981, p. 165; Diemer 1992, p. 162), which
complicates estimates of population size (McCoy and Mushinsky 1992, p.
402).
The gopher tortoise is endemic to the United States and occurs in
the southeastern Coastal Plain from southeastern South Carolina to
extreme southeastern Louisiana (Auffenberg and Franz 1982, p. 95). The
eastern portion of the gopher tortoise's range includes Alabama (east
of the Tombigbee and Mobile Rivers), Florida, Georgia, and South
Carolina. Of the eastern portion of the tortoise's range, the
northernmost part is in South Carolina; in that State, four disjunct
populations remain in Jasper County, a few tortoises occur in southern
Hampton County (Wright 1982, p. 14), and tortoises have recently been
documented in Aiken County (Clark 2001, p. 191). In Georgia, the
largest number of tortoises is found along the western Fall Line Sand
Hills and the central Tifton Uplands. Along the Coastal Plain of
Georgia, most of the tortoises are scattered due to urbanization along
the coast, which further isolates tortoises from one another (Landers
and Garner 1981, pp. 46-47). Tortoises found farther inland in rural
areas also tend to be scattered due to lack of management, such as
prescribed burning. The State of Florida contains the largest portion
of the total global range of the species. Gopher tortoises remain
widely distributed in Florida, occurring in parts of all 67 counties;
however, their current range in south Florida is restricted due to
unsuitable habitat and increased urbanization (Diemer 1987, p. 73).
Tortoises occur as far south as Cape Sable and on islands off the east
and west coasts of Florida (Auffenberg and Franz 1982, p. 99; Kushlan
and Mazzotti 1984, p. 231).
Applicability of the Act to the Eastern Portion of its Range
Section 3 of the Act defines ``species'' to include ``any
subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, and any distinct population
segment [DPS] of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife which
interbreeds when mature,'' and an ``endangered species'' as ``any
species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.'' (A ``threatened species'' is ``any
species which is likely to become an endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its
range).'' As a result, we make listing decisions on entire species or
subspecies which may be threatened or endangered throughout all or a
significant portion or their range, and on DPSs of vertebrate animals
(see our Policy Regarding the Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate
Population Segments Under the Endangered Species Act (61 FR 4722,
February 7, 1996) for information on how we define and identify DPSs).
If we recognize a population as a DPS, it is listed if we find it is
threatened or endangered throughout all or a significant portion of its
range.
If we find the gopher tortoise is threatened in the eastern portion
of the range, it may be appropriate to list the entire species as
threatened (because it is already listed as threatened in the western
portion of the range). Alternatively, we may determine that a DPS of
the gopher tortoise inhabits the eastern portion of the range, and we
may make a listing determination for that DPS.
The petition and information in our files suggest that the eastern
portion of the gopher tortoise's range contains the majority of the
total global range of the species. This indicates that the eastern
portion of the range may be a significant portion of the range of the
species, or, if discrete from the remainder of the range, a distinct
population segment of the species. See the Service's Policy Regarding
the Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate Population Segments under the
Endangered Species Act (61 FR 4722, February 7, 1996).
Therefore, we find that the petition presents substantial
information that the eastern portion of the range of the gopher
tortoise may, if threatened or endangered, be an appropriate subject of
a listing rule, and that a range-wide review of its status is
warranted.
Evaluation of Information for this Finding
Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and its implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 424 set forth the procedures for adding species
to the Federal Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants.
A species may be determined to be an endangered or threatened species
due to one or more of the five factors described in section 4(a)(1) of
the Act: (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) overutilization for
commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C)
disease or predation; (D) the inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; or (E) other natural or manmade factors affecting its
continued existence.
In making this 90-day finding, we evaluated whether information
regarding the gopher tortoise in the eastern portion of its range, as
presented in the petition and other information available in our files,
is substantial, thereby indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted. Our
[[Page 46404]]
evaluation of this information is presented below.
A. The Present or Threatened Destruction, Modification, or Curtailment
of the Species' Habitat or Range
The petition states that within the eastern portion of the range of
the gopher tortoise, land for urban uses (urban development) has
increased by approximately 614 percent, which is higher than in areas
where the federally listed western population occurs (483 percent
increase) (Vesterby and Krupa 1997, pp. 44-45). Based on the document
cited in the petition, it is unclear how the petitioners reach this
conclusion. Although the information has shown an increase in urban use
throughout the southeastern United States, it does not show that this
conversion to urban use has occurred in areas occupied by gopher
tortoises. However, information in our files indicates that conversion
of natural pine stands for urban uses can and does have detrimental
effects, caused by loss of habitat, on populations of gopher tortoises.
Based on GIS analysis of 2003 Landsat imagery, an estimated 688,963 ha
(1,701,736 ac) of former tortoise habitat in Florida are now urban,
which represents a 15.7 percent loss of historical tortoise habitat to
urbanization (FWC 2006, p. 8).
The petition also notes that between 1952 and 1999, natural pine
habitat declined by more than 61 percent within the eastern portion of
the gopher tortoise's range. The 61 percent decline is a greater
decline than the 41 percent in areas occupied by the federally listed
western population (Conner and Hartsell 2002, pp. 374-375).
Furthermore, the petition states that the amount of land devoted to
pine plantations has increased from 567,000 ha (1.4 million ac) in 1952
to nearly 8.91 million ha (22 million ac) in 1999, an increase of more
than 1,400 percent (Conner and Hartsell 2002, pp. 373-376). Information
in our files indicates that loss of natural pine stands converted to
pine plantations has an adverse effect on gopher tortoise populations
(Auffenberg and Franz 1982, p. 102). Pine plantations are typically
planted in dense rows of pine trees. The resulting open, grassy habitat
may encourage colonization for several years. Such colonies are short-
lived, however, for within l0 to l5 years, the pines shade out the
grasses, and the tortoises either die or scatter (Auffenberg and Franz
1982, p. 111).
Natural pine stands tend to have an open canopy that allows for
greater light intensity at ground level and a diversity of grasses and
forbs that the tortoises eat. Pine plantations tend to have a dense
overstory, which results in a sparse surface flora and lack of foraging
vegetation for tortoises (Auffenberg and Franz 1982, p. 102).
Conversion to pine plantations results in poor habitat quality and
smaller populations of gopher tortoises. Based on the information
provided in the petition and information in our files, there is a trend
showing an increase in planted pine and a decrease in natural pine that
could be detrimental to gopher tortoises throughout the eastern portion
of their range.
Included in the petition is a quote from the Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) that, ``it may be inevitable
that gopher tortoises will be largely eliminated from private lands in
Florida within the next three generations, which would represent a 60-
65 percent decline in tortoise habitat. We anticipate similar losses in
the other range states,'' (FWC 2001, p. 5). Kautz (1998, p. 184)
projects that natural pine forests could disappear from all commercial
forest lands in Florida by 2021. Kautz (1998, p. 182) also estimates
that between 1970 and 1995, natural pine forests in Florida declined
from 2.26 million ha (5.58 million ac) to 1.14 million ha (2.82 million
ac), a 49.4 percent loss in approximately one tortoise generation (31
years). In other States where gopher tortoises occur, human population
growth has not increased as it has in Florida over the last 50 years,
but prospects for loss of natural pine forests in these other States
are no less bleak (FWC 2001, p. 5).
The loss of natural pinelands throughout the South is further
supported by Siry (2002, p. 335), who stated that in 2000, natural pine
made up 11 percent of the forest industry's land holdings throughout
the southern United States; but by 2020, only a predicted 2 percent of
the forest industry's land holdings will be in natural pine. Siry
(2002, p. 335) also showed that in 2000, natural pine consisted of 14
percent of nonindustrial private forest holdings, whereas by 2020, only
10 percent is predicted to be left in natural pine. This information,
which was cited in the petition, is supported by information found in
our files. FWC's 2006 update to the species' 2001 status report further
indicates a serious decline in the amount of gopher tortoise habitat in
the State of Florida.
The petition also contends that the increase in habitat destruction
and degradation of upland habitats has resulted in fragmentation of
large tortoise populations and forced individuals into unsuitable
habitats and onto highways (Wilson 1997, p. 18). The petitioners'
rationale is that as the quality of isolated patches of gopher tortoise
habitat is degraded, mature adults may be forced to abandon a site in
search of better quality habitat and food. This could force the
tortoises into urban areas where food and habitat are scarce. According
to FWC (2001, p. 4), gopher tortoises left areas that had been recently
converted to pine plantations. Dense pines shade out understory forage
plants causing the tortoises to move to peripheral areas to find food.
These peripheral areas are often road shoulders, which may give the
impression that population numbers are high, even though the adjacent
pine plantation is largely unoccupied (FWC 2001, p. 4). This claim is
supported by information in our files. Roads fragment gopher tortoise
habitat and populations, and proper management of these small habitat
fragments (e.g., prescribed burning, invasive species control) becomes
complicated (FWC 2006, p. 10). Highway mortality of gopher tortoises is
probably greatest in urban areas with heavy vehicular traffic and a
relatively high number of displaced tortoises (Mushinsky et al. 2006,
p. 362).
The Service's 1990 Gopher Tortoise Recovery Plan for the western
portion of the gopher tortoise's range discusses the conversion of
natural pine habitat to other uses and describes similar effects that
are also occurring within the eastern portion of the gopher tortoise's
range (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1990, p. 9). Since this recovery
plan was written, other researchers have supplied evidence that fire
suppression and the decline of prescribed fire in both natural pine
forests and pine plantations have resulted in a substantial decline in
gopher tortoise habitat (FWC 2006, p. 10). Auffenburg and Franz (1982,
p. 106) reported that tortoise densities are highest in fire-adapted
associations (sand pine-scrub oak and longleaf pine-oak) or early
successional stages (beach scrub and old-field). In the absence of
fire, each of these associations would eventually be replaced by
predominantly evergreen hardwood communities, in which tortoises are
generally less abundant (Auffenburg and Franz 1982, pp. 106-107).
In summary, we find that the information provided in the petition,
as well as other information in our files, presents substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted due to habitat destruction (especially from
urbanization and the conversion of natural pine habitat to pine
plantations)
[[Page 46405]]
and fire suppression in natural pine forests.
B. Overutilization for Commercial, Recreational, Scientific, or
Educational Purposes
The petition states that harvesting of gopher tortoises is now
prohibited by all States throughout its range; however, commercial
hunters continue to illegally collect gopher tortoises for their meat
(Puckett and Franz 2001, p. 6). The petitioners note that in Florida
there has been a long history of human predation on tortoises,
especially in the western Panhandle. For example, prior to the closure
of tortoise harvest in the late 1980s, one community in Okaloosa County
held an annual tortoise cookout (FWC 2006, p. 4). Auffenberg and Franz
(1982, p. 103) found that tortoise populations in longleaf pine-turkey
oak (Quercus laevis) habitat in the Florida Panhandle averaged only 20
percent of the density of populations in similar habitat in the
peninsula of Florida.
Although the petition provides some information about human
predation on tortoises in the Florida Panhandle, it does not present
information on human predation in other areas of Florida or elsewhere
in the eastern portion of the range. However, information in our files
indicates that the tortoise was used for food throughout its range
during the 1930s (``Great Depression'') and as late as the 1980s in
some parts of the range. Although this activity may have abated, the
taking of adult gopher tortoises can result in long-term negative
effects on populations. Since tortoises already have high juvenile and
hatchling mortality, require a long time to reach sexual maturity, and
have a low reproductive rate, populations can show substantial effects
from the loss of reproducing adults.
The petition also provides information indicating that other human
activities focused on other species negatively affect gopher tortoises.
For example, although ``rattlesnake round-ups'' have decreased
throughout the gopher tortoise's range, they are still occurring in
South Georgia (Humane Society of the United States 2005, p. 1).
Collection methods for these round-ups include pouring gasoline into
snakes' hiding places, which include gopher tortoise burrows. The
petitioners note that Florida has banned the use of gasoline to collect
rattlesnakes from gopher tortoise burrows (Florida Administrative Code,
68A-4.001(2)) and has banned tortoise races (Florida Administrative
Code, 68A-25.002(9) and (10)). However, these activities persist in
other States such as Georgia and Alabama.
The petition also contends that past gopher tortoise harvesting
during rattlesnake roundups would most likely explain why tortoises are
absent from some seemingly appropriate habitat (Hermann 2002, p. 295).
We have evidence in our files indicating this activity did occur, at
least historically. As stated previously, some activities, although
historical in nature, may have lasting effects on populations, but the
magnitude of these effects is unknown at this time.
In summary, the petition provides information on the impacts of
past and present commercial and recreational activities on tortoises.
However, it is difficult to determine from either the information
submitted with the petition or the information in our files the current
and projected extent and magnitude of these impacts on the gopher
tortoise throughout all or a significant portion of its eastern range.
Therefore, we find that the petition does not present substantial
information for this factor.
C. Disease or Predation
The petitioners provide information that the bacterial disease
known as upper respiratory tract disease (URTD) has become more
widespread among gopher tortoises (Seigel 2003, p. 138). This disease
is highly contagious and is transmitted by close contact between
tortoises, as during courtship or male combat (Mushinsky et al. 2006,
p. 363). Symptoms of URTD can include swollen eyelids, nasal discharge,
and severe respiratory distress (Seigel 2003, p. 139). The petition
also includes information regarding the large-scale mortality of
tortoises from URTD at several sites in Florida, including the
unusually high mortality at the Kennedy Space Center between 1995 and
2000 (Seigel 2003, pp. 138-139). Data show that tortoises of both
genders and all age classes at the Kennedy Space Center were equally
vulnerable to URTD-related mortality and that an ``across the board''
decrease in tortoise numbers could be expected (Seigel 2003, p. 142).
Although URTD can result in large-scale mortality of gopher tortoises,
the petition does not provide information on the extent of this disease
on the gopher tortoise in the eastern portion of its range. Information
within our files indicates that URTD has the potential to influence
survival and reproduction of individual tortoises, but definitive data
are lacking (Brown et al. 2002, pp. 505-506); therefore, the current
extent of the impact of this disease is difficult to determine within
the eastern portion of the gopher tortoise's range.
The petition also includes information indicating that predators
pose a significant threat to gopher tortoise population viability. The
petition states that because of high nest loss to predators, a mature
gopher tortoise may produce as few as one clutch every 10 years that
actually survives. Predators destroy more than 80 percent of gopher
tortoise nests (Puckett and Franz 2001, p. 5). In South Carolina, 17 of
24 (74 percent) nests were destroyed by predators (Wright 1982, p. 59).
In Georgia, females are estimated to produce one clutch (approximately
seven eggs per clutch in southern Georgia) annually; however, predators
will destroy 87 percent of these clutches throughout that year (Landers
and Garner 1981, p. 46). In northern Florida, gopher tortoises have
been estimated to have a mortality rate of 94.2 percent during their
first year of life (Alford 1980, p. 180).
Epperson and Heise (2003, pp. 320 and 322) showed in their study
that survivorship of tortoise hatchlings was low with most (65 percent)
killed within 30 days of hatching. Information in our files indicates
that the most significant egg and hatchling predator appears to be the
raccoon (Procyon lotor) (Landers et al. 1980, p. 358); however, a
variety of mammals are reported predators of gopher tortoise, including
gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), striped skunks (Mephitis
mephitis), opossums (Didelphis virginiana), armadillos (Dasypus
novemcinctus) (Landers et al. 1980, p. 358), and dogs (Canis
domesticus) (Causey and Cude 1978, pp. 94-95). Introduced nonnative
fire ants (Solenopsis saevissima or invicta) are also reported as
hatchling predators (Landers et al. 1980, p. 358; Lohoefener and
Lohmeier 1984, p. 5).
Although disease and predation have resulted in the loss of gopher
tortoises, the petition and information in our files do not provide
sufficient information to show the extent to which these threats have
affected or are expected to affect the gopher tortoise throughout all
or a significant portion of its eastern range. Therefore, we find that
the petition does not present substantial information for this factor.
We will further review the role of disease and predation during our
status review.
D. Inadequacy of Existing Regulatory Mechanisms
The petition asserts that although each State affords some
protection to gopher tortoise in the eastern portion of its range, such
State protections have been ineffective at preventing further declines.
In Alabama, the tortoise is a State-protected nongame species; in
[[Page 46406]]
South Carolina, the species is listed as endangered; and in Georgia and
Florida, the species is listed as threatened.
In Florida, permits are required to take gopher tortoises (Florida
Administrative Code, 68A-25.002 (9) and (10)). The petition claims that
since 1991, the permitting process used by the State of Florida has
issued permits to ``entomb and kill'' an estimated 67,000 to 71,000
gopher tortoises for the construction of houses, strip malls, roads,
and schools (Fleshler 2005, p. 1). However, the State of Florida's
first action is to prevent direct harm to tortoises through its
permitting process. According to information in our files, at the time
the petition was received, the FWC had a draft 2006 Management Plan to
protect suitable habitat and relocate tortoises to this habitat. The
extent of the impacts from relocation, either positive or negative, on
this species throughout the eastern portion of the range is currently
unknown. We will evaluate this during the status review.
The information presented in the petition, as well as information
in our files, does not present substantial information for this factor.
Therefore, we have determined that the petition does not present
substantial information that the gopher tortoise throughout all or a
significant portion of its eastern range may be threatened due to the
inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms. We will continue to
evaluate this factor, including the long-term monitoring program of
gopher tortoise translocation as described in the FWC draft 2006
Management Plan, during our status review of the gopher tortoise in the
eastern portion of its range.
E. Other Natural or Manmade Factors Affecting the Species' Continued
Existence
The petition states that the previously identified threats are
accentuated by the length of time required for gopher tortoises to
reach sexual maturity and their low reproductive rate. The petition
further states that the Service used this claim as one of the
justifications for listing the gopher tortoise in the western portion
of its range as threatened in 1987 (52 FR 25376, July 7, 1987). The
petitioners contend that this same rationale applies to the eastern
portion of the range because the threats are similar to what the
western portion of the range was facing at the time of listing. As
described under the Species Information section above, female gopher
tortoises do not reach sexual maturity until about 9 to 21 years of
age; males mature at a slightly younger age (Cox et al. 1987, p. 17;
Mushinsky et al. 1994, p. 352; Aresco and Guyer 1999, pp. 503-504). As
described above, because of the natural life history parameters of the
gopher tortoise, including low reproductive rate and delayed age to
sexual maturity, the mortality experienced by other threats can be
amplified within populations. Therefore, we find that the information
provided in the petition, as well as information in our files, presents
substantial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted under this factor due to the natural life history of gopher
tortoises.
Finding
On the basis of our review and evaluation under section 4(b)(3)(A)
of the Act, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific
or commercial information that listing the gopher tortoise to include
the eastern portion of its range may be warranted due to current and
future threats under Factors A and E. Therefore, we are initiating a
status review to determine whether listing the eastern population of
the gopher tortoise is warranted. To ensure that the status review is
comprehensive (in conjunction with the status review we are conducting
under the Act's section 4(c)(2) of the listed western portion of the
range), we are soliciting scientific and commercial data and other
information regarding listing the gopher tortoise throughout all of its
range. At the conclusion of the status review, we will issue a 12-month
finding on the petition, announcing our determination of whether or not
the petitioned action is warranted.
The ``substantial information'' standard for a 90-day finding
differs from the Act's ``best scientific and commercial data'' standard
that applies to a status review to determine whether a petitioned
action is warranted. A 90-day finding does not constitute a status
review under the Act. In a 12-month finding, we will determine whether
a petitioned action is warranted after we have completed a thorough
status review of the species, which is conducted following a
substantial 90-day finding. Because the Act's standards for 90-day and
12-month findings are different, as described above, a substantial 90-
day finding does not mean that the 12-month finding will result in a
warranted finding.
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited is available on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov and upon request from the
Jacksonville Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Author
The primary authors of this notice are the staff members of the
Jacksonville Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authority
The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: August 24, 2009.
Daniel M. Ashe,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E9-21481 Filed 9-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-S