Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls, 46088-46089 [E9-21591]
Download as PDF
46088
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 8, 2009 / Notices
The application to expand the scope
of manufacturing authority under zone
procedures within Subzone 15E, as
described in the application and
Federal Register notice, is approved,
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations, including Section 400.28.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of
August 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Import Administration, Alternate Chairman,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–21622 Filed 9–4–09; 8:45 am]
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments on
foreign policy-based export controls.
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1642]
Designation of New Grantee; ForeignTrade Zone 219, Yuma, AZ; Resolution
and Order
Pursuant to its authority under the
Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18,
1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u),
and the Foreign-Trade Zones Board
Regulations (15 CFR Part 400), the
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board)
adopts the following Order:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
The Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the
Board) has considered the application (filed
06/23/2009) submitted by the Yuma County
Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 219, Yuma,
Arizona, requesting reissuance of the grant of
authority for said zone to the Greater Yuma
Economic Development Corporation, a nonprofit organization, which has accepted such
reissuance subject to approval by the FTZ
Board. Upon review, the Board finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations are satisfied, and that the
proposal is in the public interest.
Therefore, the Board approves the
application and recognizes the Greater Yuma
Economic Development Corporation as the
new grantee of Foreign Trade Zone 219,
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations, including Section 400.28.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of
August 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Import Administration, Alternate Chairman,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–21621 Filed 9–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:32 Sep 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 0908181241–91250–01]
Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export
Controls
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) is reviewing the foreign
policy-based export controls in the
Export Administration Regulations to
determine whether they should be
modified, rescinded or extended. To
help make these determinations, BIS is
seeking comments on how existing
foreign policy-based export controls
have affected exporters and the general
public.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 8, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent by
e-mail to publiccomments@bis.doc.gov
or on paper to Regulatory Policy
Division, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce,
14th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC
20230. Include the phrase ‘‘FPBEC
Comment’’ in the subject line of the email message or on the envelope if
submitting comments on paper.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan
Roberts, Foreign Policy Division, Office
of Nonproliferation and Treaty
Compliance, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Telephone: (202) 482–4252.
Copies of the current Annual Foreign
Policy Report to the Congress are
available at https://www.bis.doc.gov/
news/2009/2009-fpr.pdf and copies may
also be requested by calling the Office
of Nonproliferation and Treaty
Compliance at the number listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign
policy-based controls in the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) are
implemented pursuant to Section 6 of
the Export Administration Act of 1979,
as amended. The current foreign policybased export controls maintained by the
Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
are set forth in the EAR, including in
parts 742 (CCL Based Controls), 744
(End-User and End-Use Based Controls)
and 746 (Embargoes and Other Special
Controls). These controls apply to a
range of countries, items, activities and
persons, including: entities acting
contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United
States (§ 744.11); certain general
purpose microprocessors for ‘military
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
end-uses’ and ‘military end-users’
(§ 744.17); significant items (SI): hot
section technology for the development,
production, or overhaul of commercial
aircraft engines, components, and
systems (§ 742.14); encryption items
(§ 742.15); crime control and detection
commodities (§ 742.7); specially
designed implements of torture
(§ 742.11); certain firearms and related
items based on the Organization of
American States Model Regulations for
the Control of the International
Movement of Firearms, their Parts and
Components and Munitions included
within the Inter-American Convention
Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and
Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition,
Explosives, and Other Related Materials
(§ 742.17); regional stability items
(§ 742.6); equipment and related
technical data used in the design,
development, production, or use of
certain rocket systems and unmanned
air vehicles (§§ 742.5 and 744.3);
chemical precursors and biological
agents, associated equipment, technical
data, and software related to the
production of chemical and biological
agents (§§ 742.2 and 744.4) and various
chemicals included in those controlled
pursuant to the Chemical Weapons
Convention (§ 742.18); nuclear
propulsion (§ 744.5); aircraft and vessels
(§ 744.7); restrictions to exports on
certain persons designated as weapons
of mass destruction proliferators
(§ 744.8); communication intercepting
devices (software and technology)
(§ 742.13); embargoed countries (part
746); countries designated as supporters
of acts of international terrorism
(§§ 742.8, 742.9, 742.10, 742.19, 746.2,
746.4, 746.7, and 746.9); certain entities
in Russia (§ 744.10); individual
terrorists and terrorist organizations
(§§ 744.12, 744.13 and 744.14); certain
persons designated by Executive Order
13315 (‘‘Blocking Property of the
Former Iraqi Regime, Its Senior Officials
and Their Family Members’’) (§ 744.18);
and certain sanctioned entities
(§ 744.20). Attention is also given in this
context to the controls on nuclearrelated commodities and technology
(§§ 742.3 and 744.2), which are, in part,
implemented under section 309(c) of the
Nuclear Non Proliferation Act.
Under the provisions of section 6 of
the Export Administration Act of 1979,
as amended (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–
2420 (2000)) (EAA), export controls
maintained for foreign policy purposes
require annual extension. Section 6 of
the EAA requires a report to Congress
when foreign policy-based export
controls are extended. The EAA expired
on August 20, 2001. Executive Order
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 8, 2009 / Notices
13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002)), which has been
extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the most recent being that of
August 13, 2009 (74 FR 41,325 (August
14, 2009)), continues the EAR and, to
the extent permitted by law, the
provisions of the EAA, in effect under
the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706
(2000)). The Department of Commerce,
insofar as appropriate, is following the
provisions of Section 6 by reviewing its
foreign policy-based export controls,
requesting public comments on such
controls, and preparing a report to be
submitted to Congress. In January 2009,
the Secretary of Commerce, on the
recommendation of the Secretary of
State, extended for one year all foreign
policy-based export controls then in
effect. BIS is now soliciting public
comment on the effects of extending or
modifying the existing foreign policybased export controls for another year.
Among the criteria considered in
determining whether to continue or
revise U.S. foreign policy-based export
controls are the following:
1. The likelihood that such controls
will achieve the intended foreign policy
purpose, in light of other factors,
including the availability from other
countries of the goods, software or
technology proposed for such controls;
2. Whether the foreign policy
objective of such controls can be
achieved through negotiations or other
alternative means;
3. The compatibility of the controls
with the foreign policy objectives of the
United States and with overall United
States policy toward the country subject
to the controls;
4. Whether the reaction of other
countries to the extension of such
controls is not likely to render the
controls ineffective in achieving the
intended foreign policy objective or be
counterproductive to United States
foreign policy interests;
5. The comparative benefits to U.S.
foreign policy objectives versus the
effect of the controls on the export
performance of the United States, the
competitive position of the United
States in the international economy, the
international reputation of the United
States as a supplier of goods and
technology; and
6. The ability of the United States to
enforce the controls effectively.
BIS is particularly interested in
receiving comments on the economic
impact of proliferation controls. BIS is
also interested in industry information
relating to the following:
1. Information on the effect of foreign
policy-based export controls on sales of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:32 Sep 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
U.S. products to third countries (i.e.,
those countries not targeted by
sanctions), including the views of
foreign purchasers or prospective
customers regarding U.S. foreign policybased export controls.
2. Information on controls maintained
by U.S. trade partners. For example, to
what extent do U.S. trade partners have
similar controls on goods and
technology on a worldwide basis or to
specific destinations?
3. Information on licensing policies or
practices by our foreign trade partners
that are similar to U.S. foreign policybased export controls, including license
review criteria, use of conditions,
requirements for pre- and post-shipment
verifications (preferably supported by
examples of approvals, denials and
foreign regulations).
4. Suggestions for revisions to foreign
policy-based export controls that would
bring them more into line with
multilateral practice.
5. Comments or suggestions as to
actions that would make multilateral
controls more effective.
6. Information that illustrates the
effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on trade or acquisitions by
intended targets of the controls.
7. Data or other information on the
effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on overall trade at the level of
individual industrial sectors.
8. Suggestions as to how to measure
the effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on trade.
9. Information on the use of foreign
policy-based export controls on targeted
countries, entities, or individuals.
BIS is also interested in comments
relating generally to the extension or
revision of existing foreign policy-based
export controls.
Parties submitting comments are
asked to be as specific as possible. All
comments received before the close of
the comment period will be considered
by BIS in reviewing the controls and
developing the report to Congress.
All comments must be in writing
(either e-mail or on paper). All
comments will be a matter of public
record and will be available for public
inspection and copying.
These comments will be displayed on
BIS’s Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) Web site at www.bis.doc.gov/
foia.
Dated: September 2, 2009.
Matthew S. Borman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–21591 Filed 9–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46089
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1644]
Grant of Authority for Subzone Status;
Cellusuede Products, Inc. (Flock
Fiber), Rockford, IL
Pursuant to its authority under the
Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18,
1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u),
the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the
Board) adopts the following Order:
Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act
provides for ‘‘* * * the establishment
* * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of
entry of the United States, to expedite
and encourage foreign commerce, and
for other purposes,’’ and authorizes the
Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant to
qualified corporations the privilege of
establishing foreign-trade zones in or
adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection ports of entry;
Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15
CFR Part 400) provide for the
establishment of special-purpose
subzones when existing zone facilities
cannot serve the specific use involved,
and when the activity results in a
significant public benefit and is in the
public interest;
Whereas, the Greater Rockford Airport
Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade
Zone 176, has made application to the
Board for authority to establish a
special-purpose subzone at the flock
fiber manufacturing and distribution
facility of Cellusuede Products, Inc.,
located in Rockford, Illinois, (FTZ
Docket 48–2008, filed 9–3–2008);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment has been given in the Federal
Register (73 FR 52816–52817, 9–11–08)
and the application has been processed
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations would be satisfied,
and that the proposal would be in the
public interest if subject to the
restriction listed below;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
grants authority for subzone status for
activity related to the manufacturing
and distribution of flock fiber at the
facility of Cellusuede Products, Inc.,
located in Rockford, Illinois (Subzone
1‘76F), as described in the application
and Federal Register notice, subject to
the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations,
including Section 400.28, and further
subject to the following restriction:
Privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41)
shall be elected on foreign status nylon,
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46088-46089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21591]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 0908181241-91250-01]
Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments on foreign policy-based export controls.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is reviewing the
foreign policy-based export controls in the Export Administration
Regulations to determine whether they should be modified, rescinded or
extended. To help make these determinations, BIS is seeking comments on
how existing foreign policy-based export controls have affected
exporters and the general public.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 8, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent by e-mail to publiccomments@bis.doc.gov
or on paper to Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230. Include the phrase ``FPBEC
Comment'' in the subject line of the e-mail message or on the envelope
if submitting comments on paper.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan Roberts, Foreign Policy Division,
Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty Compliance, Bureau of Industry
and Security, Telephone: (202) 482-4252. Copies of the current Annual
Foreign Policy Report to the Congress are available at https://www.bis.doc.gov/news/2009/2009-fpr.pdf and copies may also be requested
by calling the Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty Compliance at the
number listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign policy-based controls in the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) are implemented pursuant to Section 6
of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended. The current
foreign policy-based export controls maintained by the Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS) are set forth in the EAR, including in
parts 742 (CCL Based Controls), 744 (End-User and End-Use Based
Controls) and 746 (Embargoes and Other Special Controls). These
controls apply to a range of countries, items, activities and persons,
including: entities acting contrary to the national security or foreign
policy interests of the United States (Sec. 744.11); certain general
purpose microprocessors for `military end-uses' and `military end-
users' (Sec. 744.17); significant items (SI): hot section technology
for the development, production, or overhaul of commercial aircraft
engines, components, and systems (Sec. 742.14); encryption items
(Sec. 742.15); crime control and detection commodities (Sec. 742.7);
specially designed implements of torture (Sec. 742.11); certain
firearms and related items based on the Organization of American States
Model Regulations for the Control of the International Movement of
Firearms, their Parts and Components and Munitions included within the
Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and
Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related
Materials (Sec. 742.17); regional stability items (Sec. 742.6);
equipment and related technical data used in the design, development,
production, or use of certain rocket systems and unmanned air vehicles
(Sec. Sec. 742.5 and 744.3); chemical precursors and biological
agents, associated equipment, technical data, and software related to
the production of chemical and biological agents (Sec. Sec. 742.2 and
744.4) and various chemicals included in those controlled pursuant to
the Chemical Weapons Convention (Sec. 742.18); nuclear propulsion
(Sec. 744.5); aircraft and vessels (Sec. 744.7); restrictions to
exports on certain persons designated as weapons of mass destruction
proliferators (Sec. 744.8); communication intercepting devices
(software and technology) (Sec. 742.13); embargoed countries (part
746); countries designated as supporters of acts of international
terrorism (Sec. Sec. 742.8, 742.9, 742.10, 742.19, 746.2, 746.4,
746.7, and 746.9); certain entities in Russia (Sec. 744.10);
individual terrorists and terrorist organizations (Sec. Sec. 744.12,
744.13 and 744.14); certain persons designated by Executive Order 13315
(``Blocking Property of the Former Iraqi Regime, Its Senior Officials
and Their Family Members'') (Sec. 744.18); and certain sanctioned
entities (Sec. 744.20). Attention is also given in this context to the
controls on nuclear-related commodities and technology (Sec. Sec.
742.3 and 744.2), which are, in part, implemented under section 309(c)
of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Act.
Under the provisions of section 6 of the Export Administration Act
of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. Sec. Sec. 2401-2420 (2000)) (EAA),
export controls maintained for foreign policy purposes require annual
extension. Section 6 of the EAA requires a report to Congress when
foreign policy-based export controls are extended. The EAA expired on
August 20, 2001. Executive Order
[[Page 46089]]
13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002)), which has
been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being
that of August 13, 2009 (74 FR 41,325 (August 14, 2009)), continues the
EAR and, to the extent permitted by law, the provisions of the EAA, in
effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.
1701-1706 (2000)). The Department of Commerce, insofar as appropriate,
is following the provisions of Section 6 by reviewing its foreign
policy-based export controls, requesting public comments on such
controls, and preparing a report to be submitted to Congress. In
January 2009, the Secretary of Commerce, on the recommendation of the
Secretary of State, extended for one year all foreign policy-based
export controls then in effect. BIS is now soliciting public comment on
the effects of extending or modifying the existing foreign policy-based
export controls for another year. Among the criteria considered in
determining whether to continue or revise U.S. foreign policy-based
export controls are the following:
1. The likelihood that such controls will achieve the intended
foreign policy purpose, in light of other factors, including the
availability from other countries of the goods, software or technology
proposed for such controls;
2. Whether the foreign policy objective of such controls can be
achieved through negotiations or other alternative means;
3. The compatibility of the controls with the foreign policy
objectives of the United States and with overall United States policy
toward the country subject to the controls;
4. Whether the reaction of other countries to the extension of such
controls is not likely to render the controls ineffective in achieving
the intended foreign policy objective or be counterproductive to United
States foreign policy interests;
5. The comparative benefits to U.S. foreign policy objectives
versus the effect of the controls on the export performance of the
United States, the competitive position of the United States in the
international economy, the international reputation of the United
States as a supplier of goods and technology; and
6. The ability of the United States to enforce the controls
effectively.
BIS is particularly interested in receiving comments on the
economic impact of proliferation controls. BIS is also interested in
industry information relating to the following:
1. Information on the effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on sales of U.S. products to third countries (i.e., those
countries not targeted by sanctions), including the views of foreign
purchasers or prospective customers regarding U.S. foreign policy-based
export controls.
2. Information on controls maintained by U.S. trade partners. For
example, to what extent do U.S. trade partners have similar controls on
goods and technology on a worldwide basis or to specific destinations?
3. Information on licensing policies or practices by our foreign
trade partners that are similar to U.S. foreign policy-based export
controls, including license review criteria, use of conditions,
requirements for pre- and post-shipment verifications (preferably
supported by examples of approvals, denials and foreign regulations).
4. Suggestions for revisions to foreign policy-based export
controls that would bring them more into line with multilateral
practice.
5. Comments or suggestions as to actions that would make
multilateral controls more effective.
6. Information that illustrates the effect of foreign policy-based
export controls on trade or acquisitions by intended targets of the
controls.
7. Data or other information on the effect of foreign policy-based
export controls on overall trade at the level of individual industrial
sectors.
8. Suggestions as to how to measure the effect of foreign policy-
based export controls on trade.
9. Information on the use of foreign policy-based export controls
on targeted countries, entities, or individuals.
BIS is also interested in comments relating generally to the
extension or revision of existing foreign policy-based export controls.
Parties submitting comments are asked to be as specific as
possible. All comments received before the close of the comment period
will be considered by BIS in reviewing the controls and developing the
report to Congress.
All comments must be in writing (either e-mail or on paper). All
comments will be a matter of public record and will be available for
public inspection and copying.
These comments will be displayed on BIS's Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA) Web site at www.bis.doc.gov/foia.
Dated: September 2, 2009.
Matthew S. Borman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-21591 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P