Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls, 46088-46089 [E9-21591]

Download as PDF 46088 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 8, 2009 / Notices The application to expand the scope of manufacturing authority under zone procedures within Subzone 15E, as described in the application and Federal Register notice, is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.28. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of August 2009. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. E9–21622 Filed 9–4–09; 8:45 am] AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce. ACTION: Request for comments on foreign policy-based export controls. BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [Order No. 1642] Designation of New Grantee; ForeignTrade Zone 219, Yuma, AZ; Resolution and Order Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the Foreign-Trade Zones Board Regulations (15 CFR Part 400), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES The Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the Board) has considered the application (filed 06/23/2009) submitted by the Yuma County Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 219, Yuma, Arizona, requesting reissuance of the grant of authority for said zone to the Greater Yuma Economic Development Corporation, a nonprofit organization, which has accepted such reissuance subject to approval by the FTZ Board. Upon review, the Board finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest. Therefore, the Board approves the application and recognizes the Greater Yuma Economic Development Corporation as the new grantee of Foreign Trade Zone 219, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.28. Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of August 2009. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. Attest: Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. E9–21621 Filed 9–4–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:32 Sep 04, 2009 Jkt 217001 Bureau of Industry and Security [Docket No. 0908181241–91250–01] Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is reviewing the foreign policy-based export controls in the Export Administration Regulations to determine whether they should be modified, rescinded or extended. To help make these determinations, BIS is seeking comments on how existing foreign policy-based export controls have affected exporters and the general public. DATES: Comments must be received by October 8, 2009. ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent by e-mail to publiccomments@bis.doc.gov or on paper to Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230. Include the phrase ‘‘FPBEC Comment’’ in the subject line of the email message or on the envelope if submitting comments on paper. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan Roberts, Foreign Policy Division, Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty Compliance, Bureau of Industry and Security, Telephone: (202) 482–4252. Copies of the current Annual Foreign Policy Report to the Congress are available at https://www.bis.doc.gov/ news/2009/2009-fpr.pdf and copies may also be requested by calling the Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty Compliance at the number listed above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign policy-based controls in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) are implemented pursuant to Section 6 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended. The current foreign policybased export controls maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) are set forth in the EAR, including in parts 742 (CCL Based Controls), 744 (End-User and End-Use Based Controls) and 746 (Embargoes and Other Special Controls). These controls apply to a range of countries, items, activities and persons, including: entities acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States (§ 744.11); certain general purpose microprocessors for ‘military PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 end-uses’ and ‘military end-users’ (§ 744.17); significant items (SI): hot section technology for the development, production, or overhaul of commercial aircraft engines, components, and systems (§ 742.14); encryption items (§ 742.15); crime control and detection commodities (§ 742.7); specially designed implements of torture (§ 742.11); certain firearms and related items based on the Organization of American States Model Regulations for the Control of the International Movement of Firearms, their Parts and Components and Munitions included within the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials (§ 742.17); regional stability items (§ 742.6); equipment and related technical data used in the design, development, production, or use of certain rocket systems and unmanned air vehicles (§§ 742.5 and 744.3); chemical precursors and biological agents, associated equipment, technical data, and software related to the production of chemical and biological agents (§§ 742.2 and 744.4) and various chemicals included in those controlled pursuant to the Chemical Weapons Convention (§ 742.18); nuclear propulsion (§ 744.5); aircraft and vessels (§ 744.7); restrictions to exports on certain persons designated as weapons of mass destruction proliferators (§ 744.8); communication intercepting devices (software and technology) (§ 742.13); embargoed countries (part 746); countries designated as supporters of acts of international terrorism (§§ 742.8, 742.9, 742.10, 742.19, 746.2, 746.4, 746.7, and 746.9); certain entities in Russia (§ 744.10); individual terrorists and terrorist organizations (§§ 744.12, 744.13 and 744.14); certain persons designated by Executive Order 13315 (‘‘Blocking Property of the Former Iraqi Regime, Its Senior Officials and Their Family Members’’) (§ 744.18); and certain sanctioned entities (§ 744.20). Attention is also given in this context to the controls on nuclearrelated commodities and technology (§§ 742.3 and 744.2), which are, in part, implemented under section 309(c) of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Act. Under the provisions of section 6 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401– 2420 (2000)) (EAA), export controls maintained for foreign policy purposes require annual extension. Section 6 of the EAA requires a report to Congress when foreign policy-based export controls are extended. The EAA expired on August 20, 2001. Executive Order E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 8, 2009 / Notices 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of August 13, 2009 (74 FR 41,325 (August 14, 2009)), continues the EAR and, to the extent permitted by law, the provisions of the EAA, in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706 (2000)). The Department of Commerce, insofar as appropriate, is following the provisions of Section 6 by reviewing its foreign policy-based export controls, requesting public comments on such controls, and preparing a report to be submitted to Congress. In January 2009, the Secretary of Commerce, on the recommendation of the Secretary of State, extended for one year all foreign policy-based export controls then in effect. BIS is now soliciting public comment on the effects of extending or modifying the existing foreign policybased export controls for another year. Among the criteria considered in determining whether to continue or revise U.S. foreign policy-based export controls are the following: 1. The likelihood that such controls will achieve the intended foreign policy purpose, in light of other factors, including the availability from other countries of the goods, software or technology proposed for such controls; 2. Whether the foreign policy objective of such controls can be achieved through negotiations or other alternative means; 3. The compatibility of the controls with the foreign policy objectives of the United States and with overall United States policy toward the country subject to the controls; 4. Whether the reaction of other countries to the extension of such controls is not likely to render the controls ineffective in achieving the intended foreign policy objective or be counterproductive to United States foreign policy interests; 5. The comparative benefits to U.S. foreign policy objectives versus the effect of the controls on the export performance of the United States, the competitive position of the United States in the international economy, the international reputation of the United States as a supplier of goods and technology; and 6. The ability of the United States to enforce the controls effectively. BIS is particularly interested in receiving comments on the economic impact of proliferation controls. BIS is also interested in industry information relating to the following: 1. Information on the effect of foreign policy-based export controls on sales of VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:32 Sep 04, 2009 Jkt 217001 U.S. products to third countries (i.e., those countries not targeted by sanctions), including the views of foreign purchasers or prospective customers regarding U.S. foreign policybased export controls. 2. Information on controls maintained by U.S. trade partners. For example, to what extent do U.S. trade partners have similar controls on goods and technology on a worldwide basis or to specific destinations? 3. Information on licensing policies or practices by our foreign trade partners that are similar to U.S. foreign policybased export controls, including license review criteria, use of conditions, requirements for pre- and post-shipment verifications (preferably supported by examples of approvals, denials and foreign regulations). 4. Suggestions for revisions to foreign policy-based export controls that would bring them more into line with multilateral practice. 5. Comments or suggestions as to actions that would make multilateral controls more effective. 6. Information that illustrates the effect of foreign policy-based export controls on trade or acquisitions by intended targets of the controls. 7. Data or other information on the effect of foreign policy-based export controls on overall trade at the level of individual industrial sectors. 8. Suggestions as to how to measure the effect of foreign policy-based export controls on trade. 9. Information on the use of foreign policy-based export controls on targeted countries, entities, or individuals. BIS is also interested in comments relating generally to the extension or revision of existing foreign policy-based export controls. Parties submitting comments are asked to be as specific as possible. All comments received before the close of the comment period will be considered by BIS in reviewing the controls and developing the report to Congress. All comments must be in writing (either e-mail or on paper). All comments will be a matter of public record and will be available for public inspection and copying. These comments will be displayed on BIS’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Web site at www.bis.doc.gov/ foia. Dated: September 2, 2009. Matthew S. Borman, Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Administration. [FR Doc. E9–21591 Filed 9–4–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–33–P PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 46089 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [Order No. 1644] Grant of Authority for Subzone Status; Cellusuede Products, Inc. (Flock Fiber), Rockford, IL Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ‘‘* * * the establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for other purposes,’’ and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of entry; Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest; Whereas, the Greater Rockford Airport Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 176, has made application to the Board for authority to establish a special-purpose subzone at the flock fiber manufacturing and distribution facility of Cellusuede Products, Inc., located in Rockford, Illinois, (FTZ Docket 48–2008, filed 9–3–2008); Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the Federal Register (73 FR 52816–52817, 9–11–08) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner’s report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board’s regulations would be satisfied, and that the proposal would be in the public interest if subject to the restriction listed below; Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone status for activity related to the manufacturing and distribution of flock fiber at the facility of Cellusuede Products, Inc., located in Rockford, Illinois (Subzone 1‘76F), as described in the application and Federal Register notice, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.28, and further subject to the following restriction: Privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41) shall be elected on foreign status nylon, E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46088-46089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21591]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

[Docket No. 0908181241-91250-01]


Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

ACTION: Request for comments on foreign policy-based export controls.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is reviewing the 
foreign policy-based export controls in the Export Administration 
Regulations to determine whether they should be modified, rescinded or 
extended. To help make these determinations, BIS is seeking comments on 
how existing foreign policy-based export controls have affected 
exporters and the general public.

DATES: Comments must be received by October 8, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent by e-mail to publiccomments@bis.doc.gov 
or on paper to Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and 
Security, Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230. Include the phrase ``FPBEC 
Comment'' in the subject line of the e-mail message or on the envelope 
if submitting comments on paper.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan Roberts, Foreign Policy Division, 
Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty Compliance, Bureau of Industry 
and Security, Telephone: (202) 482-4252. Copies of the current Annual 
Foreign Policy Report to the Congress are available at https://www.bis.doc.gov/news/2009/2009-fpr.pdf and copies may also be requested 
by calling the Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty Compliance at the 
number listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign policy-based controls in the Export 
Administration Regulations (EAR) are implemented pursuant to Section 6 
of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended. The current 
foreign policy-based export controls maintained by the Bureau of 
Industry and Security (BIS) are set forth in the EAR, including in 
parts 742 (CCL Based Controls), 744 (End-User and End-Use Based 
Controls) and 746 (Embargoes and Other Special Controls). These 
controls apply to a range of countries, items, activities and persons, 
including: entities acting contrary to the national security or foreign 
policy interests of the United States (Sec.  744.11); certain general 
purpose microprocessors for `military end-uses' and `military end-
users' (Sec.  744.17); significant items (SI): hot section technology 
for the development, production, or overhaul of commercial aircraft 
engines, components, and systems (Sec.  742.14); encryption items 
(Sec.  742.15); crime control and detection commodities (Sec.  742.7); 
specially designed implements of torture (Sec.  742.11); certain 
firearms and related items based on the Organization of American States 
Model Regulations for the Control of the International Movement of 
Firearms, their Parts and Components and Munitions included within the 
Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and 
Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related 
Materials (Sec.  742.17); regional stability items (Sec.  742.6); 
equipment and related technical data used in the design, development, 
production, or use of certain rocket systems and unmanned air vehicles 
(Sec. Sec.  742.5 and 744.3); chemical precursors and biological 
agents, associated equipment, technical data, and software related to 
the production of chemical and biological agents (Sec. Sec.  742.2 and 
744.4) and various chemicals included in those controlled pursuant to 
the Chemical Weapons Convention (Sec.  742.18); nuclear propulsion 
(Sec.  744.5); aircraft and vessels (Sec.  744.7); restrictions to 
exports on certain persons designated as weapons of mass destruction 
proliferators (Sec.  744.8); communication intercepting devices 
(software and technology) (Sec.  742.13); embargoed countries (part 
746); countries designated as supporters of acts of international 
terrorism (Sec. Sec.  742.8, 742.9, 742.10, 742.19, 746.2, 746.4, 
746.7, and 746.9); certain entities in Russia (Sec.  744.10); 
individual terrorists and terrorist organizations (Sec. Sec.  744.12, 
744.13 and 744.14); certain persons designated by Executive Order 13315 
(``Blocking Property of the Former Iraqi Regime, Its Senior Officials 
and Their Family Members'') (Sec.  744.18); and certain sanctioned 
entities (Sec.  744.20). Attention is also given in this context to the 
controls on nuclear-related commodities and technology (Sec. Sec.  
742.3 and 744.2), which are, in part, implemented under section 309(c) 
of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Act.
    Under the provisions of section 6 of the Export Administration Act 
of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. Sec. Sec.  2401-2420 (2000)) (EAA), 
export controls maintained for foreign policy purposes require annual 
extension. Section 6 of the EAA requires a report to Congress when 
foreign policy-based export controls are extended. The EAA expired on 
August 20, 2001. Executive Order

[[Page 46089]]

13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002)), which has 
been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being 
that of August 13, 2009 (74 FR 41,325 (August 14, 2009)), continues the 
EAR and, to the extent permitted by law, the provisions of the EAA, in 
effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
1701-1706 (2000)). The Department of Commerce, insofar as appropriate, 
is following the provisions of Section 6 by reviewing its foreign 
policy-based export controls, requesting public comments on such 
controls, and preparing a report to be submitted to Congress. In 
January 2009, the Secretary of Commerce, on the recommendation of the 
Secretary of State, extended for one year all foreign policy-based 
export controls then in effect. BIS is now soliciting public comment on 
the effects of extending or modifying the existing foreign policy-based 
export controls for another year. Among the criteria considered in 
determining whether to continue or revise U.S. foreign policy-based 
export controls are the following:
    1. The likelihood that such controls will achieve the intended 
foreign policy purpose, in light of other factors, including the 
availability from other countries of the goods, software or technology 
proposed for such controls;
    2. Whether the foreign policy objective of such controls can be 
achieved through negotiations or other alternative means;
    3. The compatibility of the controls with the foreign policy 
objectives of the United States and with overall United States policy 
toward the country subject to the controls;
    4. Whether the reaction of other countries to the extension of such 
controls is not likely to render the controls ineffective in achieving 
the intended foreign policy objective or be counterproductive to United 
States foreign policy interests;
    5. The comparative benefits to U.S. foreign policy objectives 
versus the effect of the controls on the export performance of the 
United States, the competitive position of the United States in the 
international economy, the international reputation of the United 
States as a supplier of goods and technology; and
    6. The ability of the United States to enforce the controls 
effectively.
    BIS is particularly interested in receiving comments on the 
economic impact of proliferation controls. BIS is also interested in 
industry information relating to the following:
    1. Information on the effect of foreign policy-based export 
controls on sales of U.S. products to third countries (i.e., those 
countries not targeted by sanctions), including the views of foreign 
purchasers or prospective customers regarding U.S. foreign policy-based 
export controls.
    2. Information on controls maintained by U.S. trade partners. For 
example, to what extent do U.S. trade partners have similar controls on 
goods and technology on a worldwide basis or to specific destinations?
    3. Information on licensing policies or practices by our foreign 
trade partners that are similar to U.S. foreign policy-based export 
controls, including license review criteria, use of conditions, 
requirements for pre- and post-shipment verifications (preferably 
supported by examples of approvals, denials and foreign regulations).
    4. Suggestions for revisions to foreign policy-based export 
controls that would bring them more into line with multilateral 
practice.
    5. Comments or suggestions as to actions that would make 
multilateral controls more effective.
    6. Information that illustrates the effect of foreign policy-based 
export controls on trade or acquisitions by intended targets of the 
controls.
    7. Data or other information on the effect of foreign policy-based 
export controls on overall trade at the level of individual industrial 
sectors.
    8. Suggestions as to how to measure the effect of foreign policy-
based export controls on trade.
    9. Information on the use of foreign policy-based export controls 
on targeted countries, entities, or individuals.
    BIS is also interested in comments relating generally to the 
extension or revision of existing foreign policy-based export controls.
    Parties submitting comments are asked to be as specific as 
possible. All comments received before the close of the comment period 
will be considered by BIS in reviewing the controls and developing the 
report to Congress.
    All comments must be in writing (either e-mail or on paper). All 
comments will be a matter of public record and will be available for 
public inspection and copying.
    These comments will be displayed on BIS's Freedom of Information 
Act (FOIA) Web site at www.bis.doc.gov/foia.

    Dated: September 2, 2009.

Matthew S. Borman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-21591 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.