Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Opacity Variance for Rocket Testing Operations Atlantic Research Corporation's Orange County Facility, 45795-45796 [E9-21398]
Download as PDF
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 171 / Friday, September 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Department, following a review of all of
the facts in a statement of reasonable
cause alleged in support of
nonassessment or a complete or partial
waiver of the penalty, shall notify the
plan sponsor, in writing, of its
determination on the statement of
reasonable cause and its determination
whether to waive the penalty in whole
or in part, and/or assess a penalty. If it
is the determination of the Department
to assess a penalty, the notice shall
indicate the amount of the penalty
assessment, not to exceed the amount
described in paragraph (c) of this
section. This notice is a ‘‘pleading’’ for
purposes of § 2570.131(m) of this
chapter.
(2) Except as provided in paragraph
(h) of this section, a notice issued
pursuant to paragraph (g)(1) of this
section, indicating the Department’s
determination to assess a penalty, shall
become a final order, within the
meaning of § 2570.131(g) of this chapter,
forty-five (45) days from the date of
service of the notice.
(h) Administrative hearing. A notice
issued pursuant to paragraph (g) of this
section will not become a final order,
within the meaning of § 2570.131(g) of
this chapter, if, within thirty (30) days
from the date of the service of the
notice, the plan sponsor or a
representative thereof files a request for
a hearing under §§ 2570.130 through
2570.141 of this chapter, and files an
answer to the notice. The request for
hearing and answer must be filed in
accordance with § 2570.132 of this
chapter and § 18.4 of this title. The
answer opposing the proposed sanction
shall be in writing, and supported by
reference to specific circumstances or
facts surrounding the notice of
determination issued pursuant to
paragraph (g) of this section.
(i) Service of notices and filing of
statements. (1) Service of a notice for
purposes of paragraphs (c) and (g) of
this section shall be made:
(i) By delivering a copy to the plan
sponsor or representative thereof;
(ii) By leaving a copy at the principal
office, place of business, or residence of
the plan sponsor or representative
thereof; or
(iii) By mailing a copy to the last
known address of the plan sponsor or
representative thereof.
(2) If service is accomplished by
certified mail, service is complete upon
mailing. If service is by regular mail,
service is complete upon receipt by the
addressee. When service of a notice
under paragraph (c) or (g) of this section
is by certified mail, five days shall be
added to the time allowed by these rules
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Sep 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
for the filing of a statement or a request
for hearing and answer, as applicable.
(3) For purposes of this section, a
statement of reasonable cause shall be
considered filed:
(i) Upon mailing, if accomplished
using United States Postal Service
certified mail or express mail;
(ii) Upon receipt by the delivery
service, if accomplished using a
‘‘designated private delivery service’’
within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. 7502(f);
(iii) Upon transmittal, if transmitted
in a manner specified in the notice of
intent to assess a penalty as a method
of transmittal to be accorded such
special treatment; or
(iv) In the case of any other method
of filing, upon receipt by the
Department at the address provided in
the notice of intent to assess a penalty.
(j) Liability. (1) If more than one
person is responsible as plan sponsor
for violations referred to in paragraph
(a) of this section, all such persons shall
be jointly and severally liable for such
violations.
(2) Any person, or persons under
paragraph (j)(1) of this section, against
whom a civil penalty has been assessed
under section 502(c)(8) of the Act,
pursuant to a final order within the
meaning of § 2570.131(g) of this chapter,
shall be personally liable for the
payment of such penalty.
(k) Cross-references. (1) The
procedural rules in §§ 2570.130 through
2570.141 of this chapter apply to
administrative hearings under section
502(c)(8) of the Act.
(2) When applying procedural rules in
§§ 2570.130 through 2570.140:
(i) Wherever the term ‘‘502(c)(7)’’
appears, such term shall mean
‘‘502(c)(8)’’;
(ii) Reference to § 2560.502c–7(g) in
2570.131(c) shall be construed as
reference to § 2560.502c–8(g) of this
chapter;
(iii) Reference to § 2560.502c–7(e) in
§ 2570.131(g) shall be construed as
reference to § 2560.502c–8(e) of this
chapter;
(iv) Reference to § 2560.502c–7(g) in
§ 2570.131(m) shall be construed as
reference to § 2560.502c–8(g); and
(v) Reference to §§ 2560.502c–7(g) and
2560.502c–7(h) in § 2570.134 shall be
construed as reference to §§ 2560.502c–
8(g) and 2560.502c–8(h), respectively.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of
August 2009.
Phyllis C. Borzi,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, Department of
Labor.
[FR Doc. E9–21343 Filed 9–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45795
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0520; FRL–8953–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Opacity Variance for Rocket Testing
Operations Atlantic Research
Corporation’s Orange County Facility
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the
Commonwealth of Virginia for the
purpose of adding 9 VAC 5 Chapter 220,
‘‘Variance for Rocket Motor Test
Operations at Atlantic Research
Corporation Orange County Facility’’
which includes an opacity variance for
the rocket motor test operations at
Aerojet Corporation’s Orange County
Facility, in lieu of opacity limits
established in the Virginia SIP. In the
Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A more detailed description
of the Commonwealth’s submittal and
EPA’s evaluation are included in a
Technical Support Document (TSD)
prepared in support of this rulemaking
action. A copy of the TSD is available,
upon request, from the EPA Regional
Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of
this document. If no adverse comments
are received in response to this action,
no further activity is contemplated. If
EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by October 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2009–0520 by one of the
following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail:
fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0520,
Cristina Fernandez, Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S.
E:\FR\FM\04SEP1.SGM
04SEP1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
45796
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 171 / Friday, September 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2009–
0520. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Sep 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
available at Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Becoat, (215) 814–2036, or by
e-mail at becoat.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final
action, with the same title: ‘‘Virginia;
Opacity Variance for Rocket Testing
Operations Atlantic Research
Corporation’s Orange County Facility,’’
which is located in the ‘‘Rules and
Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register publication. Please note that if
EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
Dated: August 26, 2009.
James W. Newsom,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E9–21398 Filed 9–3–09; 8:45 am]
2. E-mail: cruise.nicole@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Send written comments to
Nicole Cruise, EPA Region 7, Solid
Waste/Pollution Prevention Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to Nicole Cruise, EPA
Region 7, Solid Waste/Pollution
Prevention Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8 to 4:30, excluding legal
holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole Cruise at (913) 551–7641, or by
e-mail at cruise.nicole@epa.gov.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 239 and 258
[EPA–R07–RCRA–2009–0646; FRL–8953–4]
Adequacy of Kansas Municipal Solid
Waste Landfill Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve
Kansas’ Research, Development and
Demonstration (RD&D) permit program
and updates to the approved Municipal
Solid Waste Landfill Permit (MSWLP)
program. On March 22, 2004, the EPA
issued final regulations allowing RD&D
permits to be issued to certain
municipal solid waste landfills by
approved states. On December 11, 2008,
Kansas submitted an application to the
EPA seeking Federal approval of its
RD&D requirements and to update
Federal approval of its MSWLP
program.
DATES: Comments on this proposed
action must be received in writing by
October 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
RCRA–2009–0646 by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
In the
final rules section of the Federal
Register, EPA is approving Kansas’
Research, Development and
Demonstration permit program and
updates to the approved Municipal
Solid Waste Landfill Permit (MSWLP)
program as a direct final rule without
prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial action
and anticipates no relevant adverse
comments to this action. If no relevant
adverse comments are received in
response to this action, no further
activity is contemplated in relation to
this action. If EPA receives relevant
adverse comments, the direct final rule
will be withdrawn and all public
comments received will be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on this
proposed action. EPA will not institute
a second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on part of this rule and if that
part can be severed from the remainder
of the rule, EPA may adopt as final
those parts of the rule that are not the
subject of an adverse comment. For
additional information, see the direct
final rule which is located in the rules
section of this Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Sfmt 4702
Dated: August 27, 2009.
William W. Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. E9–21401 Filed 9–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\04SEP1.SGM
04SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 171 (Friday, September 4, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45795-45796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21398]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0520; FRL-8953-2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Virginia; Opacity Variance for Rocket Testing Operations Atlantic
Research Corporation's Orange County Facility
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia for the purpose of
adding 9 VAC 5 Chapter 220, ``Variance for Rocket Motor Test Operations
at Atlantic Research Corporation Orange County Facility'' which
includes an opacity variance for the rocket motor test operations at
Aerojet Corporation's Orange County Facility, in lieu of opacity limits
established in the Virginia SIP. In the Final Rules section of this
Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a
direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this
as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
more detailed description of the Commonwealth's submittal and EPA's
evaluation are included in a Technical Support Document (TSD) prepared
in support of this rulemaking action. A copy of the TSD is available,
upon request, from the EPA Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this document. If no adverse comments are received in
response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final
rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received in writing by October 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2009-0520 by one of the following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. E-mail: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0520, Cristina Fernandez, Chief, Air
Quality Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S.
[[Page 45796]]
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2009-0520. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the
Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the
State submittal are available at Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality, 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Becoat, (215) 814-2036, or by
e-mail at becoat.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final action, with the same title:
``Virginia; Opacity Variance for Rocket Testing Operations Atlantic
Research Corporation's Orange County Facility,'' which is located in
the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register
publication. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
Dated: August 26, 2009.
James W. Newsom,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E9-21398 Filed 9-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P