Environmental Impact Statement for the California High Speed Train Project From Palmdale to Bakersfield, CA, 45891-45893 [E9-21381]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 171 / Friday, September 4, 2009 / Notices
consummation with the Board to signify
that it has exercised the authority
granted and fully abandoned the line. If
consummation has not been effected by
NSR’s filing of a notice of
consummation by September 4, 2010,
and there are no legal or regulatory
barriers to consummation, the authority
to abandon will automatically expire.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: August 31, 2009.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–21359 Filed 9–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for
the California High Speed Train Project
From Palmdale to Bakersfield, CA
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
SUMMARY: This notice is to advise the
public that FRA and the California
High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority)
will jointly prepare a project
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and project Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) for the Palmdale to
Bakersfield section of the Authority’s
proposed California High Speed Train
(HST) System in compliance with
relevant state and federal laws, in
particular the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) and the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
In 2001, the Authority and FRA
started a tiered environmental review
process for the HST system and in 2005,
completed the first tier California High
Speed Train Program EIR/EIS
(Statewide Program EIR/EIS) and
approved the statewide HST system for
intercity travel in California between the
major metropolitan centers of
Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay
Area in the north, through the Central
Valley, to Los Angeles and San Diego in
the south. The approved HST system
would be about 800-miles long, with
electric propulsion and steel-wheel-onsteel-rail trains capable of maximum
operating speeds of 220 miles per hour
(mph) on a mostly dedicated system of
fully grade-separated, access-controlled
steel track and with state-of-the-art
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:16 Sep 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
safety, signaling, communication, and
automated train control systems. In
approving the HST system, the
Authority and FRA also selected
preferred corridor alignments and
station location options throughout
most of the system. In 2008, the
Authority and FRA completed a second
program EIR/EIS to evaluate alignments
and station locations within the broad
corridor between and including the
Altamont Pass and the Pacheco Pass to
connect the Bay Area and Central Valley
portions of the HST system.
The preparation of the Palmdale to
Bakersfield HST Project EIR/EIS will
involve the development of preliminary
engineering designs and the assessment
of potential environmental effects
associated with the construction,
operation, and maintenance of the HST
system, including track and ancillary
facilities along the State Route 58/14
corridor from Bakersfield to Palmdale.
DATES: Written comments on the scope
of the Palmdale to Bakersfield HST
Project EIR/EIS should be provided to
the Authority by 5 p.m., Monday,
November 2, 2009. Public scoping
meetings are scheduled from September
15, 2009 to September 17, 2009, as
noted below in the cities of Bakersfield,
CA, Tehachapi, CA and Palmdale, CA.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
scope should be sent to Ms. Carrie
Bowen, Regional Director, ATTN:
Bakersfield to Palmdale, California High
Speed Rail Authority, 925 L Street,
Suite 1425, Sacramento, CA 95814, or
via e-mail with subject line ‘‘Palmdale
to Bakersfield HST’’ to:
comments@hsr.ca.gov. Comments may
also be provided orally or in writing at
the scoping meetings scheduled at the
following locations:
• Red Lion Hotel, 2400 Camino Del
Rio Court. Bakersfield, CA 93308, 3 p.m.
to 7 p.m., September 15, 2009.
• Stallion Springs Community Center,
27850 Stallion Springs Drive,
Tehachapi, CA 93561, 3 p.m. to 7 p.m.,
September 16, 2009.
• Chimbole Cultural Center, 38350
Sierra Highway, Palmdale, CA 93550, 3
p.m. to 7 p.m., September 17, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Valenstein, Environmental
Program Manager, Office of Railroad
Development, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., (Mail Stop 20),
Washington, DC 20590; Telephone:
(202) 493–6368, or Ms. Carrie Bowen,
Telephone: (559) 221–2636 at the above
noted address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Authority was established in 1996 and
is authorized and directed by statue to
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45891
undertake the planning and
development of a proposed statewide
HST network that is fully coordinated
with other public transportation
services. The Authority adopted a Final
Business Plan in June 2000, which
reviewed the economic feasibility of an
800-mile-long HST capable of speeds in
excess of 200 miles per hour on a mostly
dedicated, fully grade-separated state-ofthe-art track. The Authority released an
updated Business Plan in November
2008.
The FRA has responsibility for
overseeing the safety of railroad
operations, including the safety of any
proposed high-speed ground
transportation system. For the proposed
HST, it is anticipated that FRA would
need to take certain regulatory actions
prior to operation.
In 2005, the Authority and FRA
completed the Statewide Program EIR/
EIS for the Proposed California High
Speed Train System, as the first phase
of a tiered environmental review
process. The Authority certified the
Statewide Program EIR under CEQA and
approved the proposed HST System.
FRA issued a Record of Decision on the
Statewide Program EIR/EIS as required
under NEPA. The Statewide Program
EIR/EIS established the purpose and
need for the HST system, analyzed an
HST system, and compared the
proposed HST system with a No Project/
No Action Alternative and a Modal
Alternative. In approving the Statewide
Program EIR/EIS, the Authority and
FRA selected the HST Alternative,
selected certain corridors/general
alignments and general station locations
for further study, incorporated
mitigation strategies and design
practices, and specified further
measures to guide the development of
the HST system during the site-specific,
project level environmental review to
avoid and minimize potential adverse
environmental impacts. In the Statewide
Program EIR/EIS, the Authority and
FRA selected the State Route 58/14
corridor for the Palmdale to Bakersfield
section of the HST.
The Palmdale to Bakersfield HST
Project EIR/EIS will tier from the
Statewide Program EIR/EIS and the
Final Bay Area to Central Valley HST
Program EIR/EIS in accordance with
Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) regulations, (40 CFR 1508.28) and
State CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R.
15168(b)). Tiering ensures that the
Palmdale to Bakersfield HST Project
EIR/EIS builds upon all previous work
prepared for, and incorporated in, the
Statewide Program EIR/EIS and the Bay
Area to Central Valley HST Program
EIR/EIS.
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
45892
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 171 / Friday, September 4, 2009 / Notices
The Palmdale to Bakersfield HST
Project EIR/EIS will describe sitespecific environmental impacts, identify
specific mitigation measures to address
those impacts, and incorporate design
practices to avoid and minimize
potential adverse environmental
impacts. The FRA and the Authority
will assess the site characteristics, size,
nature, and timing of proposed sitespecific projects to determine whether
the impacts are potentially significant
and whether impacts can be avoided or
mitigated. This project EIR/EIS will
identify and evaluate reasonable and
feasible site-specific alignment
alternatives, and evaluate the impacts of
construction, operation, and
maintenance of the HST system.
Information and documents regarding
this HST environmental review process
will be made available through the
Authority’s Internet site: https://
www.cahighspeedrail.gov/.
Purpose and Need: The purpose of the
proposed HST system is to provide a
new mode of high-speed intercity travel
that would link major metropolitan
areas of the state; interface with airports,
mass transit, and highways; and provide
added capacity to meet increased
intercity travel demand in California in
a manner sensitive to and protective of
California’s unique natural resources.
The need for a HST system is directly
related to the expected growth in
population, and increases in intercity
travel demand in California over the
next twenty years and beyond. With the
growth in travel demand, there will be
an increase in travel delays arising from
the growing congestion on California’s
highways and airports. In addition,
there will be negative effects on the
economy, quality of life, and air quality
in and around California’s metropolitan
areas from an increasingly congested
transportation system that will become
less reliable as travel demand increases.
The intercity highway system,
commercial airports, and conventional
passenger rail serving the intercity
travel market are currently operating at
or near capacity, and will require large
public investments for maintenance and
expansion to meet existing demand and
future growth. The proposed HST
system is designed to address some
social, economic and environmental
problems associated with transportation
congestion in California.
Alternatives: The Palmdale to
Bakersfield HST Project EIR/EIS will
consider a No Action or No Project
Alternative and an HST Alternative for
the Palmdale to Bakersfield section.
No Action Alternative: The No Action
Alternative (No Project or No Build)
represents the conditions in the corridor
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:16 Sep 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
as it existed in 2007, and as it would
exist based on programmed and funded
improvements to the intercity
transportation system and other
reasonably foreseeable projects through
2035, taking into account the following
sources of information: The State
Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP) and Regional Transportation
Plans (RTPs) for all modes of travel,
airport plans, intercity passenger rail
plans, city and county plans.
HST Alternative: The Authority
proposes to construct, operate and
maintain an electric-powered steelwheel-on-steel-rail HST system, about
800 miles long, capable of operating
speeds of 220 mph on mostly dedicated,
fully graded-separated tracks, with stateof-the-art safety, signaling, and
automated train control systems. In the
Statewide Program EIR/EIS, the
Authority and FRA selected the State
Route 58/14 corridor for the Palmdale to
Bakersfield section of the HST.
Engineering studies undertaken as part
of this EIR/EIS process will examine
and refine alignments in the State Route
58/14 corridor. The entire alignment
would be grade separated. The options
to be considered for the design of grade
separated roadway crossings would
include (1) Depressing the street to pass
under the rail line; (2) elevating the
street to pass over the rail line; and (3)
leaving the street as-is and constructing
rail line improvements to pass over or
under the local street. In addition,
alternative sites for right-of-way
maintenance, train storage facilities and
a heavy maintenance and repair facility
will be evaluated in the Palmdale to
Bakersfield HST project area.
No station would be included in this
section as this project connects the HST
line in the Central Valley with the HST
line from Los Angeles and stations are
being evaluated as part of the project
EIR/EISs associated with those HST
sections. A station at the Palmdale
Airport/Transportation Center is being
evaluated in the Los Angeles to
Palmdale HST Project EIR/EIS. The
Truxtun station option in downtown
Bakersfield at the other end of this
section is being evaluated in the
Bakersfield to Merced HST Project EIR/
EIS. These station locations were
selected by the Authority and FRA in
the Program EIR/EIS documents after
considering the project purpose and
need, and the program objectives.
Probable Effects: The purpose of the
EIR/EIS process is to explore, in a
public setting, the effects of the
proposed project on the physical,
human, and natural environment. The
FRA and Authority will continue the
tiered evaluation of all significant
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
environmental, social, and economic
impacts of the construction and
operation of the HST system. Impact
areas to be addressed include
transportation impacts; safety and
security; land use and zoning; land
acquisition, displacements, and
relocations and cumulative and
secondary impacts; agricultural land
impacts; cultural resources impacts,
including impacts on historical and
archaeological resources and parklands/
recreation areas; neighborhood
compatibility and environmental
justice; natural resource impacts
including air quality, wetlands, water
resources, noise, vibration, energy,
wildlife and ecosystems, including
endangered species. Measures to avoid,
minimize, and mitigate adverse impacts
will be identified and evaluated.
The Palmdale to Bakersfield HST
Project EIR/EIS will be prepared in
accordance with FRA’s Procedures for
Considering Environmental Impacts (64
FR 28545 (May 26, 1999)) and will
address, as necessary, other applicable
statutes, regulations, and executive
orders, including the Clean Air Act,
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, Section 4(f) of
the Department of Transportation Act,
the Endangered Species Act, and
Executive Order 12898 on
Environmental Justice.
This EIR/EIS process will also
continue the NEPA/Clean Water Act
Section 404 integration process
established through the Statewide
Program EIR/EIS process. The EIR/EIS
will evaluate project alignment
alternatives and station and
maintenance facility locations to
support a determination of the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable
Alternative (LEDPA) by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
Scoping and Comments: FRA
encourages broad participation in the
EIS process during scoping and review
of the resulting environmental
documents. Comments are invited from
all interested agencies and the public to
ensure the full range of issues related to
the proposed action and reasonable
alternatives are addressed and all
significant issues are identified. In
particular, FRA is interested in hearing
from communities whether there are
areas of environmental concern where
there might be a potential for significant
site-specific impacts from the highspeed transportation projects in the
Palmdale to Bakersfield section. Public
agencies with jurisdiction are requested
to advise FRA and the Authority of the
applicable permit and environmental
review requirements of each agency,
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 171 / Friday, September 4, 2009 / Notices
and the scope and content of the
environmental information germane to
the agency’s statutory responsibilities
relevant to the proposed project. Public
agencies are requested to advise FRA if
they anticipate taking a major action in
connection with the proposed project
and if they wish to cooperate in the
preparation of the Project EIR/EIS.
Public scoping meetings have been
scheduled and are an important
component of the scoping process for
both the State and Federal
environmental review. The scoping
meetings described in this Notice will
also be the subject of additional public
notification.
FRA is seeking participation and
input of all interested federal, state, and
local agencies, Native American groups,
and other concerned private
organizations or individuals on the
scope of the EIR/EIS. Implementation of
the Palmdale to Bakersfield section of
the HST system is a federal undertaking
with the potential to affect historic
properties. As such, it is subject to the
requirements of Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act of
1966 (16 U.S.C. 470f). In accordance
with regulations issued by the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation, 36
CFR part 800, FRA intends to coordinate
compliance with Section 106 of this Act
with the preparation of the EIR/EIS,
beginning with the identification of
consulting parties through the scoping
process, in a manner consistent with the
standards set out in 36 CFR 800.8.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 28,
2009.
Mark E. Yachmetz,
Associate Administrator for Railroad
Development, Federal Railroad
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–21381 Filed 9–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Twelfth Joint Meeting, RTCA Special
Committee 205/EUROCAE WG 71:
Software Considerations in
Aeronautical Systems
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice
to advise the public of a meeting of
RTCA Special Committee 205/
17:16 Sep 03, 2009
Day 1—Monday, October 26
• 08:30 a.m.—Chair’s Introductory
Remarks;
• 09:00 a.m.—Review of Meeting
Agenda and Agreement of Previous
Minutes;
• 09:30 a.m.—Reports of Sub-Group
Activity;
• 10:00 a.m.—Other Committee/Other
Documents Interfacing Personnel
Reports (CAST, Unmanned Aircraft
Systems, Security, WG–63/SAE S–18);
• 10:45 a.m.—Sub-Group Break Out
Sessions.
New Member Introduction Session
• 10:45 a.m.—All new committee
members are invited to attend an
introduction session to explain the
operation of the committee, the various
sub-groups and the topics they are
dealing with and the Web site.
• 13:15 p.m.—Sub-Group Break Out
Sessions;
• 15:15 p.m.—Plenary Session: Text
Acceptance (for papers posted,
commented on and reworked prior to
Plenary).
Day 2—Tuesday, October 27
ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special
Committee 205/EUROCAE WG 71:
Software Considerations in Aeronautical
Systems meeting.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
EUROCAE WG 71: Software
Considerations in Aeronautical Systems.
DATES: The meeting will be held
October 26–30, 2009, from 8:30 a.m. to
5 p.m. (variable—see daily schedule).
Pre-registration Requirements: If you are
planning on attending this meeting we
would appreciate you providing preregistration information.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
´ ´
Telecom ParisTech, 46 rue Barrault
75013 Paris, France.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1)
RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036;
telephone (202) 833–9339; fax (202)
833–9434; Web site https://www.rtca.org;
(2) Hotel Front Desk: (602) 273–7778;
fax (602) 275–5616;
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is
hereby given for a Special Committee
205: EUROCAE WG 71: Software
Considerations in Aeronautical Systems
meeting.
The agenda will include:
Jkt 217001
• 08:30 a.m.—Sub-Group Break Out
Sessions;
• 12:30 p.m.—Milestone: IP
submittals due for Wednesday Plenary;
• 13:30 p.m.—Sub-Group Break Out
Sessions;
• 15:00 p.m.—Mandatory Paper
Reading Session.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45893
Day 3—Wednesday, October 28
• 08:30 a.m.—IP Comment Reply &
Sub-Group Break Out Sessions (focused
on finalizing any changes to papers
being presented later in the morning);
• 10:30 a.m.—Plenary Text
Acceptance (for papers posted,
commented on and reworked prior to
Plenary);
• 13:30 p.m.—Sub-Group Break Out
Sessions;
• 14:45 p.m.—Break;
• 15:00 p.m.—Sub-Group Break Out
Sessions.
Day 4—Thursday, October 29
• 08:30 a.m.—Sub-Group Break Out
Sessions;
• 12:30 p.m.— Milestone: IP
submittals due for Friday Plenary;
• 13:30 p.m.—Plenary Session;
• 15:00 p.m.—Mandatory Paper
Reading Session.
Day 5—Friday, October 30
• 08:00 a.m.—IP Comment Reply &
Sub-Group Break Out Sessions (focused
on finalizing any changes to papers
being presented during the morning);
• 10:00 a.m.—Plenary Text Approval
(reworked and late posted papers—with
late posted papers only being accepted
if (a) the changes are very minor in
nature, and (b) adequate time has been
allowed for the review of the papers);
• 12:00 p.m.—SG1: SCWG Document
Integration Sub-Group Report;
• 12:05 p.m.—SG2: Issue & Rationale
Sub-Group Report;
• 12:10 p.m.—SG3: Tool
Qualification Sub-Group Report;
• 12:15 p.m.—SG4: Model Based
Design & Verification Sub-Group Report;
• 12:20 p.m.—SG5: Object Oriented
Technology Sub-Group Report;
• 12:25 p.m.—SG6: Formal Methods
Sub-Group Report;
• 12:30 p.m.—SG7: Special
Considerations Sub-Group Report;
• 12:35 p.m.—Next Meeting
Information;
• 12:40 p.m.—Any Other Business,
Closing Remarks & Meeting Adjourned;
• 12:45 p.m.—Meeting Evaluation
(Round Robin).
Attendance is open to the interested
public but limited to space availability.
With the approval of the chairmen,
members of the public may present oral
statements at the meeting. Persons
wishing to present statements or obtain
information should contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Members of the public
may present a written statement to the
committee at any time.
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 171 (Friday, September 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45891-45893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21381]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for the California High Speed
Train Project From Palmdale to Bakersfield, CA
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice is to advise the public that FRA and the
California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) will jointly prepare a
project Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and project Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the Palmdale to Bakersfield section of the
Authority's proposed California High Speed Train (HST) System in
compliance with relevant state and federal laws, in particular the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
In 2001, the Authority and FRA started a tiered environmental
review process for the HST system and in 2005, completed the first tier
California High Speed Train Program EIR/EIS (Statewide Program EIR/EIS)
and approved the statewide HST system for intercity travel in
California between the major metropolitan centers of Sacramento and the
San Francisco Bay Area in the north, through the Central Valley, to Los
Angeles and San Diego in the south. The approved HST system would be
about 800-miles long, with electric propulsion and steel-wheel-on-
steel-rail trains capable of maximum operating speeds of 220 miles per
hour (mph) on a mostly dedicated system of fully grade-separated,
access-controlled steel track and with state-of-the-art safety,
signaling, communication, and automated train control systems. In
approving the HST system, the Authority and FRA also selected preferred
corridor alignments and station location options throughout most of the
system. In 2008, the Authority and FRA completed a second program EIR/
EIS to evaluate alignments and station locations within the broad
corridor between and including the Altamont Pass and the Pacheco Pass
to connect the Bay Area and Central Valley portions of the HST system.
The preparation of the Palmdale to Bakersfield HST Project EIR/EIS
will involve the development of preliminary engineering designs and the
assessment of potential environmental effects associated with the
construction, operation, and maintenance of the HST system, including
track and ancillary facilities along the State Route 58/14 corridor
from Bakersfield to Palmdale.
DATES: Written comments on the scope of the Palmdale to Bakersfield HST
Project EIR/EIS should be provided to the Authority by 5 p.m., Monday,
November 2, 2009. Public scoping meetings are scheduled from September
15, 2009 to September 17, 2009, as noted below in the cities of
Bakersfield, CA, Tehachapi, CA and Palmdale, CA.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope should be sent to Ms. Carrie
Bowen, Regional Director, ATTN: Bakersfield to Palmdale, California
High Speed Rail Authority, 925 L Street, Suite 1425, Sacramento, CA
95814, or via e-mail with subject line ``Palmdale to Bakersfield HST''
to: comments@hsr.ca.gov. Comments may also be provided orally or in
writing at the scoping meetings scheduled at the following locations:
Red Lion Hotel, 2400 Camino Del Rio Court. Bakersfield, CA
93308, 3 p.m. to 7 p.m., September 15, 2009.
Stallion Springs Community Center, 27850 Stallion Springs
Drive, Tehachapi, CA 93561, 3 p.m. to 7 p.m., September 16, 2009.
Chimbole Cultural Center, 38350 Sierra Highway, Palmdale,
CA 93550, 3 p.m. to 7 p.m., September 17, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Valenstein, Environmental
Program Manager, Office of Railroad Development, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., (Mail Stop 20),
Washington, DC 20590; Telephone: (202) 493-6368, or Ms. Carrie Bowen,
Telephone: (559) 221-2636 at the above noted address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Authority was established in 1996 and is
authorized and directed by statue to undertake the planning and
development of a proposed statewide HST network that is fully
coordinated with other public transportation services. The Authority
adopted a Final Business Plan in June 2000, which reviewed the economic
feasibility of an 800-mile-long HST capable of speeds in excess of 200
miles per hour on a mostly dedicated, fully grade-separated state-of-
the-art track. The Authority released an updated Business Plan in
November 2008.
The FRA has responsibility for overseeing the safety of railroad
operations, including the safety of any proposed high-speed ground
transportation system. For the proposed HST, it is anticipated that FRA
would need to take certain regulatory actions prior to operation.
In 2005, the Authority and FRA completed the Statewide Program EIR/
EIS for the Proposed California High Speed Train System, as the first
phase of a tiered environmental review process. The Authority certified
the Statewide Program EIR under CEQA and approved the proposed HST
System. FRA issued a Record of Decision on the Statewide Program EIR/
EIS as required under NEPA. The Statewide Program EIR/EIS established
the purpose and need for the HST system, analyzed an HST system, and
compared the proposed HST system with a No Project/No Action
Alternative and a Modal Alternative. In approving the Statewide Program
EIR/EIS, the Authority and FRA selected the HST Alternative, selected
certain corridors/general alignments and general station locations for
further study, incorporated mitigation strategies and design practices,
and specified further measures to guide the development of the HST
system during the site-specific, project level environmental review to
avoid and minimize potential adverse environmental impacts. In the
Statewide Program EIR/EIS, the Authority and FRA selected the State
Route 58/14 corridor for the Palmdale to Bakersfield section of the
HST.
The Palmdale to Bakersfield HST Project EIR/EIS will tier from the
Statewide Program EIR/EIS and the Final Bay Area to Central Valley HST
Program EIR/EIS in accordance with Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) regulations, (40 CFR 1508.28) and State CEQA Guidelines (14
C.C.R. 15168(b)). Tiering ensures that the Palmdale to Bakersfield HST
Project EIR/EIS builds upon all previous work prepared for, and
incorporated in, the Statewide Program EIR/EIS and the Bay Area to
Central Valley HST Program EIR/EIS.
[[Page 45892]]
The Palmdale to Bakersfield HST Project EIR/EIS will describe site-
specific environmental impacts, identify specific mitigation measures
to address those impacts, and incorporate design practices to avoid and
minimize potential adverse environmental impacts. The FRA and the
Authority will assess the site characteristics, size, nature, and
timing of proposed site-specific projects to determine whether the
impacts are potentially significant and whether impacts can be avoided
or mitigated. This project EIR/EIS will identify and evaluate
reasonable and feasible site-specific alignment alternatives, and
evaluate the impacts of construction, operation, and maintenance of the
HST system. Information and documents regarding this HST environmental
review process will be made available through the Authority's Internet
site: https://www.cahighspeedrail.gov/.
Purpose and Need: The purpose of the proposed HST system is to
provide a new mode of high-speed intercity travel that would link major
metropolitan areas of the state; interface with airports, mass transit,
and highways; and provide added capacity to meet increased intercity
travel demand in California in a manner sensitive to and protective of
California's unique natural resources. The need for a HST system is
directly related to the expected growth in population, and increases in
intercity travel demand in California over the next twenty years and
beyond. With the growth in travel demand, there will be an increase in
travel delays arising from the growing congestion on California's
highways and airports. In addition, there will be negative effects on
the economy, quality of life, and air quality in and around
California's metropolitan areas from an increasingly congested
transportation system that will become less reliable as travel demand
increases. The intercity highway system, commercial airports, and
conventional passenger rail serving the intercity travel market are
currently operating at or near capacity, and will require large public
investments for maintenance and expansion to meet existing demand and
future growth. The proposed HST system is designed to address some
social, economic and environmental problems associated with
transportation congestion in California.
Alternatives: The Palmdale to Bakersfield HST Project EIR/EIS will
consider a No Action or No Project Alternative and an HST Alternative
for the Palmdale to Bakersfield section.
No Action Alternative: The No Action Alternative (No Project or No
Build) represents the conditions in the corridor as it existed in 2007,
and as it would exist based on programmed and funded improvements to
the intercity transportation system and other reasonably foreseeable
projects through 2035, taking into account the following sources of
information: The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and
Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs) for all modes of travel, airport
plans, intercity passenger rail plans, city and county plans.
HST Alternative: The Authority proposes to construct, operate and
maintain an electric-powered steel-wheel-on-steel-rail HST system,
about 800 miles long, capable of operating speeds of 220 mph on mostly
dedicated, fully graded-separated tracks, with state-of-the-art safety,
signaling, and automated train control systems. In the Statewide
Program EIR/EIS, the Authority and FRA selected the State Route 58/14
corridor for the Palmdale to Bakersfield section of the HST.
Engineering studies undertaken as part of this EIR/EIS process will
examine and refine alignments in the State Route 58/14 corridor. The
entire alignment would be grade separated. The options to be considered
for the design of grade separated roadway crossings would include (1)
Depressing the street to pass under the rail line; (2) elevating the
street to pass over the rail line; and (3) leaving the street as-is and
constructing rail line improvements to pass over or under the local
street. In addition, alternative sites for right-of-way maintenance,
train storage facilities and a heavy maintenance and repair facility
will be evaluated in the Palmdale to Bakersfield HST project area.
No station would be included in this section as this project
connects the HST line in the Central Valley with the HST line from Los
Angeles and stations are being evaluated as part of the project EIR/
EISs associated with those HST sections. A station at the Palmdale
Airport/Transportation Center is being evaluated in the Los Angeles to
Palmdale HST Project EIR/EIS. The Truxtun station option in downtown
Bakersfield at the other end of this section is being evaluated in the
Bakersfield to Merced HST Project EIR/EIS. These station locations were
selected by the Authority and FRA in the Program EIR/EIS documents
after considering the project purpose and need, and the program
objectives.
Probable Effects: The purpose of the EIR/EIS process is to explore,
in a public setting, the effects of the proposed project on the
physical, human, and natural environment. The FRA and Authority will
continue the tiered evaluation of all significant environmental,
social, and economic impacts of the construction and operation of the
HST system. Impact areas to be addressed include transportation
impacts; safety and security; land use and zoning; land acquisition,
displacements, and relocations and cumulative and secondary impacts;
agricultural land impacts; cultural resources impacts, including
impacts on historical and archaeological resources and parklands/
recreation areas; neighborhood compatibility and environmental justice;
natural resource impacts including air quality, wetlands, water
resources, noise, vibration, energy, wildlife and ecosystems, including
endangered species. Measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse
impacts will be identified and evaluated.
The Palmdale to Bakersfield HST Project EIR/EIS will be prepared in
accordance with FRA's Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts
(64 FR 28545 (May 26, 1999)) and will address, as necessary, other
applicable statutes, regulations, and executive orders, including the
Clean Air Act, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act, the Endangered Species Act, and
Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice.
This EIR/EIS process will also continue the NEPA/Clean Water Act
Section 404 integration process established through the Statewide
Program EIR/EIS process. The EIR/EIS will evaluate project alignment
alternatives and station and maintenance facility locations to support
a determination of the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable
Alternative (LEDPA) by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Scoping and Comments: FRA encourages broad participation in the EIS
process during scoping and review of the resulting environmental
documents. Comments are invited from all interested agencies and the
public to ensure the full range of issues related to the proposed
action and reasonable alternatives are addressed and all significant
issues are identified. In particular, FRA is interested in hearing from
communities whether there are areas of environmental concern where
there might be a potential for significant site-specific impacts from
the high-speed transportation projects in the Palmdale to Bakersfield
section. Public agencies with jurisdiction are requested to advise FRA
and the Authority of the applicable permit and environmental review
requirements of each agency,
[[Page 45893]]
and the scope and content of the environmental information germane to
the agency's statutory responsibilities relevant to the proposed
project. Public agencies are requested to advise FRA if they anticipate
taking a major action in connection with the proposed project and if
they wish to cooperate in the preparation of the Project EIR/EIS.
Public scoping meetings have been scheduled and are an important
component of the scoping process for both the State and Federal
environmental review. The scoping meetings described in this Notice
will also be the subject of additional public notification.
FRA is seeking participation and input of all interested federal,
state, and local agencies, Native American groups, and other concerned
private organizations or individuals on the scope of the EIR/EIS.
Implementation of the Palmdale to Bakersfield section of the HST system
is a federal undertaking with the potential to affect historic
properties. As such, it is subject to the requirements of Section 106
of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 470f). In
accordance with regulations issued by the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation, 36 CFR part 800, FRA intends to coordinate compliance
with Section 106 of this Act with the preparation of the EIR/EIS,
beginning with the identification of consulting parties through the
scoping process, in a manner consistent with the standards set out in
36 CFR 800.8.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 28, 2009.
Mark E. Yachmetz,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Development, Federal Railroad
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-21381 Filed 9-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P