Definition of Marine Debris for Purposes of the Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act, 45555-45560 [E9-21261]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 170 / Thursday, September 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71,
to establish Class E airspace upward
from 700 ft. above the surface and from
1,200 ft. above the surface at two
heliport facilities at Oooguruk, AK (74
FR 17443). Subsequent to publication,
the FAA found that a sentence
referencing exclusion of restricted
airspace in the description for the
Oooguruk Drill Site Helipad was
inadvertantly omitted. This action
corrects this error. Class E controlled
airspace extending upward from 700 ft.
and 1,200 ft. above the surface in the
Oooguruk heliport area is established by
this action.
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA.
No comments were received. The rule,
with the clarification of the airspace
description of the Drill Site Helipad, is
adopted as proposed.
The Class E airspace areas designated
as 700/1,200 ft. transition areas are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.9S, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, signed October 3,
2008, and effective October 31, 2008,
which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in the
Order.
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR part 71
establishes Class E airspace extending
700 and 1,200 feet above the surface at
Oooguruk, AK. New special IAPs have
been developed for two heliport
facilities, Oooguruk Drill Site Helipad,
and Oooguruk Tie-in Helipad, that will
provide adequate controlled airspace for
IFR operations at these landing sites.
Also, added to the airspace description
for the Drill Site Helipad will be
‘‘* * *, excluding of that portion within
R–2204 when R–2204 is active.’’
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore—(1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:15 Sep 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section
40103, Sovereignty and use of airspace.
Under that section, the FAA is charged
with prescribing regulations to ensure
the safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace. This regulation is
within the scope of that authority
because it creates Class E airspace
sufficient in size to contain aircraft
executing instrument procedures for the
two helipads at Oooguruk, AK and
represents the FAA’s continuing effort
to safely and efficiently use the
navigable airspace.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
45555
of the Oooguruk Drill Site Helipad, AK,
excluding that portion within R2204 when
R2204 is active.
*
*
*
*
*
AAL AK E5 Oooguruk Tie-in Helipad, AK
[New]
Oooguruk, Oooguruk Tie-in Helipad, AK
(Lat. 70°24′51″ N., long. 150°01′07″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius
of the Oooguruk Tie-in Helipad AK,
excluding that portion within R2204 when
R2204 is active; and that airspace extending
upward from 1,200 feet above the surface
within a 73-mile radius of the Oooguruk Tiein Helipad, AK, excluding that portion
within R2204 when R2204 is active.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Anchorage, AK, on August 20,
2009.
James L. Krause,
Acting Manager, Alaska Flight Services
Information Area Group.
[FR Doc. E9–21061 Filed 9–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Adoption of the Amendment
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
15 CFR Part 909
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;
AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING
POINTS
Coast Guard
■
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
signed October 3, 2008, and effective
October 31, 2008, is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Extending
Upward from 700 feet or More Above the
Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AAL AK E5 Oooguruk Drill Site Helipad,
AK [New]
Oooguruk, Oooguruk Drill Site Helipad, AK
(Lat. 70°29′44″ N., long. 150°15′12″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius
of the Oooguruk Drill Site Helipad, AK; and
that airspace extending upward from 1,200
feet above the surface within a 73-mile radius
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 151
[USCG–2007–0164]
RIN 0648–AV68; 1625–AB24
Definition of Marine Debris for
Purposes of the Marine Debris
Research, Prevention, and Reduction
Act
AGENCY: National Ocean Service (NOS),
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), Department of
Commerce; Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: NOAA and the Coast Guard
are defining ‘‘marine debris’’ for
purposes of the Marine Debris Research,
Prevention, and Reduction Act (the
Act). The Act requires NOAA and the
Coast Guard to jointly develop a
definition and promulgate it through
regulations; this rule represents the
agencies’ compliance with the Act. For
the purposes of the Marine Debris
Research, Prevention, and Reduction
Act only, marine debris is defined as
any persistent solid material that is
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
45556
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 170 / Thursday, September 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
manufactured or processed and directly
or indirectly, intentionally or
unintentionally, disposed of or
abandoned into the marine environment
or the Great Lakes.
DATES: This final rule is effective
October 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and related
material received from the public, as
well as documents mentioned in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG–2007–
0164 and are available for inspection
and copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You also may find this docket on the
Internet by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, selecting the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, typing USCG–
2007–0164 into the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this rule, call
Dr. Holly A. Bamford, NOAA Marine
Debris Program, telephone 301–713–
2989, or David Major, Environmental
Standards Division, U.S. Coast Guard
Headquarters, telephone 202–372–1402.
If you have questions about viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Regulatory History
III. Background and Purpose
IV. Discussion of Comments and Changes
A. Comments on the Purpose of the
Definition
B. Comments on ‘‘Marine Environment’’
C. Comments on ‘‘Solid’’
D. Comments on ‘‘Persistent’’
E. Comments on ‘‘Manufactured or
Processed’’
F. Comments on ‘‘Disposed of or
Abandoned Into’’
G. Comments on Discharges in Compliance
With Law
H. Comments on Items Placed in the
Marine Environment by Permit
I. Comments on Medical Waste and
Hazardous Materials
J. Comments on Consultation With the
Interagency Marine Debris Coordinating
Committee
V. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:15 Sep 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Department of Commerce Docket
Number
N. Environment
I. Abbreviations
IMDCC Interagency Marine Debris
Coordinating Committee
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
FR Federal Register
MARPOL 73/78 International Convention
for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships,
1973, as modified by the protocol of 1978
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
NOAA Program NOAA’s Marine Debris
Prevention and Removal Program
NOS National Ocean Service
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
NRC National Research Council
OMB Office of Management and Budget
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Regulatory History
On May 27, 2008, NOAA and the
Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking entitled
‘‘Definition of Marine Debris for
Purposes of the Marine Debris Research,
Prevention, and Pollution Act’’ in the
Federal Register (73 FR 30322). The
title of the rulemaking has been
corrected by replacing the word
‘‘pollution’’ with ‘‘reduction,’’ to reflect
the correct name of the Act. NOAA and
the Coast Guard received six letters,
containing a total of 24 comments, from
the public, and four letters, containing
17 comments, from Federal agencies
commenting on the proposed rule. All
comments are discussed below. No
public meeting was requested and none
was held.
III. Background and Purpose
As society has developed new uses for
materials, particularly plastics, the
variety and quantity of items found in
the marine environment has increased
dramatically. These products range from
common domestic material (e.g., bags,
cups, bottles, balloons) to industrial
products (e.g., strapping bands, plastic
sheeting, hard hats, resin pellets) to lost
or discarded fishing gear (e.g., nets,
buoys, traps, lines, light sticks).
In 2006, Congress passed the Marine
Debris Research, Prevention, and
Reduction Act (the Act) (33 U.S.C.
1951–1958 (2006)), with the purpose of
identifying, determining the sources of,
assessing, reducing, and preventing
marine debris and its adverse impacts
on the marine environment and
navigation safety.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Act makes permanent a Marine
Debris Prevention and Removal Program
within NOAA (NOAA Program) that
intends to reduce and prevent the
occurrence and adverse impacts of
marine debris on the marine
environment and navigation safety. The
NOAA Program includes mapping,
identification, impact assessment,
removal, and prevention of marine
debris, with a focus on threats to living
marine resources, including commercial
fisheries and species protected under
the Endangered Species Act and Marine
Mammal Protection Act, and the habitat
upon which they depend. The NOAA
Program uses non-regulatory measures
to reduce and prevent marine debris and
the loss of fishing gear, including the
development of local or regional
protocols for lost gear reduction and
prevention. Examples of such measures
include new fishing gear technology,
implementation of incentives to reduce
lost gear, outreach and education to
commercial users and the general
public, and other non-regulatory
measures to minimize the volume of
marine debris and lost and discarded
fishing gear, and to aid in its recovery.
The Act authorizes NOAA to provide
grants to entities for the research,
prevention, and reduction of marine
debris.
The Act requires the Coast Guard to
enforce the International Convention for
the Prevention of Pollution from Ships,
1973, as modified by the 1978 Protocol
(MARPOL 73/78), Annex V, and the Act
to Prevent Pollution from Ships, 33 USC
1901–1915 (1996). The Coast Guard will
continue to monitor and enforce the
requirements of these acts among the
appropriate regulated industries and
communities. The Coast Guard intends
to increase international cooperation to
reduce marine debris, and to maintain
its voluntary reporting program in order
to ensure the reporting of damage to
vessels and disruption to navigation
caused by marine debris. The Act also
required the Coast Guard to submit to
Congress a report evaluating the Coast
Guard’s progress on these initiatives; the
report required under 33 U.S.C. 1953(b)
was completed in 2007. In addition, the
Act required the Coast Guard to obtain
a report from the National Research
Council (NRC) on the effectiveness of
international and domestic measures to
prevent and reduce marine debris and
its impacts; this report was completed
and presented to Congress by NRC in
September, 2008.
The Act also reactivated the
Interagency Marine Debris Coordinating
Committee (IMDCC), an interagency
Federal body responsible for developing
and recommending comprehensive and
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 170 / Thursday, September 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
multi-disciplinary approaches to reduce
the sources and impacts of marine
debris to the nation’s marine
environment, natural resources, public
safety, and economy. The IMDCC meets
quarterly to ensure coordination of
research, monitoring, education, and
regulatory actions addressing the
persistent marine debris problem.
As codified in Title 33 of the United
States Code, the Act requires NOAA and
the Coast Guard, in consultation with
the IMDCC, to ‘‘jointly develop and
promulgate through regulations a
definition of the term ‘marine debris’ for
the purposes of this Act.’’ 33 U.S.C.
1954(b)(2006). The Act expressly limits
the application of the definition of
marine debris to the implementation
and requirements of the Act. The Act
does not authorize NOAA or the Coast
Guard to undertake regulatory actions
other than the promulgation of this
definition, and the definition of marine
debris does not affect the regulatory or
management activities of other Federal
agencies.
NOAA and the Coast Guard worked
together to develop and propose a
definition, taking into account both
agencies’ responsibilities under the Act.
The term ‘‘marine debris’’ has a variety
of meanings to the many entities
working in and affecting the marine
environment. The definition
promulgated by this rule, however,
focuses on solid debris from land-based
and ocean-based sources. While NOAA
and the Coast Guard considered
alternative definitions, this definition
will allow NOAA to consider the
broadest possible range of marine debris
activities for grant and research support
as provided in the Act. The definition
will also provide the Coast Guard
sufficient parameters to conduct useful
and focused studies and reports
required by the Act.
As required by the Act, the two
agencies consulted with the IMDCC
during the development of this
definition. Some IMDCC members
suggested that the definition include the
term ‘‘unauthorized’’ in order to exclude
materials explicitly permitted to be
discharged into the marine
environment. NOAA and the Coast
Guard did not include the term
‘‘unauthorized’’ in the definition. As
discussed in more detail below, such a
limited definition would be inconsistent
with the objectives of the Act, which are
to identify, determine the sources of,
assess, reduce, and prevent the full
range of marine debris and its adverse
effects on the marine environment and
navigation safety. Authority to dispose
of or abandon material that may be
considered marine debris as defined in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:15 Sep 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
this regulation is not affected by the
promulgation of this definition or the
implementation of the programs
established pursuant to the Act. Some
IMDCC members also suggested that the
definition of marine debris be limited to
debris with adverse effects on the
marine environment. NOAA and the
Coast Guard did not include this
limitation because it would prevent the
NOAA program from supporting or
conducting research where impacts of
debris on marine resources are
unknown or uncertain. Limiting the
range of research opportunities in this
way would diminish the ability of
NOAA and the Coast Guard to fulfill the
objectives of the Act.
On May 27, 2008, the two agencies
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) proposing a
definition of marine debris for purposes
of the Act. The proposed definition read
as follows: ‘‘For the purposes of the
Marine Debris Research, Prevention,
and Reduction Act (33 U.S.C. 1951–
1958 (2006)) only, marine debris is
defined as any persistent solid material
that is manufactured or processed and
directly or indirectly, intentionally or
unintentionally, disposed of or
abandoned into the marine environment
or the Great Lakes.’’
IV. Discussion of Comments and
Changes
The Coast Guard and NOAA received
10 letters containing a total of 41
comments on the proposed definition.
After consideration of all the comments,
and for the reasons set out below, the
Coast Guard and NOAA adopt the
proposed definition without changes.
A. Comments on the Purpose of the
Definition
Several commenters approached the
definition of marine debris from an
enforcement perspective, assuming that
items within the definition of marine
debris would necessarily be subject to
anti-pollution mandates. An item that
satisfies the definition of marine debris
may, in some cases, be addressed by
anti-pollution laws that prohibit the
disposal or abandonment of the
material. However, the fact that a
material satisfies the definition of
marine debris does not mean its
disposal or abandonment is prohibited.
The Act does not prohibit the disposal
or abandonment of marine debris, nor
does it provide regulatory authority to
do so. Instead, the Act is intended to
help identify, assess, reduce, and
prevent marine debris. See Section III of
this preamble for details on agency
involvement in addressing these areas.
The definition of marine debris will be
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45557
used only for the implementation of the
Act.
B. Comments on ‘‘Marine Environment’’
Two commenters asked what areas are
included in the term ‘‘marine
environment.’’ NOAA and the Coast
Guard use the term ‘‘marine
environment’’ consistently with its use
in other sections of the United States
Code. The term ‘‘marine environment’’
is defined in various parts of the United
States Code to include the high seas,
exclusive economic zone, territorial sea,
coastal waters, Great Lakes, navigable
waters of the United States, and the
lands therein and thereunder, and
adjacent shorelines and shorelands.
NOAA and the Coast Guard specifically
included the Great Lakes in the
definition of marine debris to avoid
confusion. The marine environment
does not include airspace above bodies
of water.
One commenter requested that the
term ‘‘marine environment’’ be replaced
with the term ‘‘aquatic environment’’ in
order to cover debris originating from
land-based sources via creeks and
tributaries. As explained in part F
below, such debris is already addressed
by the definition.
C. Comments on ‘‘Solid’’
Three commenters asked whether
specific materials they consider to be
‘‘semi-solid’’ would be included within
the definition of marine debris, or
encouraged that such materials be
included. Marine debris, pursuant to the
Act, is defined as any persistent solid
material and therefore does not include
semi-solids, such as tar balls and sewer
cakes. NOAA and the Coast Guard
concluded that the Act was not
intended to cover materials other than
solid materials. Internationally and
domestically, the generally accepted
usage of ‘‘marine debris,’’ including in
research, refers to solid items. For
example, all of the marine debris items
catalogued in the 1988 Report of the
Interagency Task Force on Persistent
Debris are solids.
D. Comments on ‘‘Persistent’’
Three commenters asked for
clarification of the word ‘‘persistent’’ as
used in the definition. The term
‘‘persistent’’ is intended to capture
items that degrade slowly, as noted in
the CEQ Ocean Blueprint for the 21st
Century and the House Report on the
Act (H.R. Rep. No. 109–332, pt. 2, at
1759 (2006)). This also is consistent
with the 1988 Report of the Interagency
Task Force on Persistent Debris, in
which small pieces of plastic and plastic
particles are recognized as marine
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
45558
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 170 / Thursday, September 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
debris. Persistency is affected by
material composition, movement within
the water column, and exposure to
sunlight, among other things. The
ability of marine debris to travel long
distances away from the point of origin
is taken into account in considering
persistency.
E. Comments on ‘‘Manufactured or
Processed’’
Five commenters requested the
definition be modified to include
‘‘naturally occurring’’ debris such as
downed trees, or expressed interest in
the treatment of lost agricultural cargo.
The Coast Guard and NOAA concluded
that organic matter that is not processed
or manufactured, that enters the marine
environment, would not meet the
definition of marine debris within the
context of the Act, which focuses on
manufactured and processed items. To
the extent that organic matter has been
subject to manufacturing or processing,
those items may be considered marine
debris if they satisfy the remainder of
the definition.
One commenter requested the
definition be modified to include
materials ‘‘intended to be processed.’’
The commenter provided the specific
example of raw materials used for
plastic production, namely preproduction plastic pellets. All plastic
items have been created through a
manufacturing process, as they do not
exist naturally in the environment.
Therefore, plastic in any form and of
any size already is included in the
definition of marine debris. Similar
manufactured persistent solids
mentioned by commenters, such as golf
balls, also are considered marine debris.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
F. Comments on ‘‘Disposed of or
Abandoned Into’’
Commenters described a variety of
means by which material can be
disposed of or abandoned into the
marine environment, such as transport
by wind or storm drains, and inquired
how or whether the manner of transport
affects whether or not the material is
within this definition of marine debris.
The means by which material enters
into marine environment does not affect
whether that material is considered
marine debris. As noted in the preamble
above, a variety of both sea and landside
events and activities, such as storm
water runoff, wind, or natural disasters,
may ultimately result in materials being
abandoned or disposed of in the marine
environment. For that reason, the
definition of marine debris includes
materials disposed of or abandoned
‘‘directly or indirectly, intentionally or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:15 Sep 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
unintentionally’’ into the marine
environment.
G. Comments on Discharges in
Compliance With Law
Three commenters commented on
whether the definition of marine debris
should include materials discharged in
compliance with relevant enforcement
regimes. A persistent solid material that
is manufactured or processed, and
disposed of or abandoned into the
marine environment, is considered
marine debris even when the disposal or
abandonment is legally permissible. As
noted above, NOAA and the Coast
Guard define marine debris exclusively
for the purposes of the Act, and the Act
does not create an enforcement regime.
Existing enforcement regimes referenced
in the Act, such as the Act to Prevent
Pollution from Ships and MARPOL
Annex V, allow the legal discharge of
items into the sea. Congress did not
state in the Act or legislative history that
a definition exclude those items.
Moreover, it would be impractical to
classify items based on source rather
than location. For example, a tin can
located in the sea may have been
discharged in accordance with
MARPOL or may have blown into the
ocean from a pier. In both
circumstances, considering the tin can
to be marine debris fulfills the intent of
the Act.
The Act is non-regulatory and
overlaps with current enforcement
regimes established by other laws. The
fact that an item is legally disposed of
or abandoned does not prevent it being
studied or tracked. Environmental goals
can be achieved through non-regulatory
means, including study and the
promotion of new methods to prevent,
reduce, and mitigate the effects of
debris. Thus, marine debris of any type
is open for research or other activities as
specified in the Act.
H. Comments on Items Placed in the
Marine Environment by Permit
Four commenters raised concerns that
materials placed in the marine
environment by public agencies or
under permit by public agencies—such
as artificial reefs, marine structures,
vessels, rigs, pipelines, and navigational
and weather buoys—may be deemed
marine debris. The Coast Guard and
NOAA do not consider such items
disposed of or abandoned, because the
items are intact, on station, and
monitored. However, an item or piece of
an item originally placed or permitted
in the marine environment, but that
subsequently breaks apart, becomes lost,
or is no longer actively monitored,
could be considered disposed of or
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
abandoned and would meet the
definition of marine debris. The Coast
Guard and NOAA emphasize that a
government approval or permission for
disposal or abandonment of material
into the marine environment does not
exclude that material from research,
removal, or outreach activities
contemplated by the Act. For example,
a tire reef off the coast of Florida, legally
placed there in 1972, has fragmented
and allowed tires to drift across the
seafloor; those tires are considered
marine debris for purposes of the Act.
I. Comments on Medical Waste and
Hazardous Materials
Three commenters expressed concern
about medical waste, such as syringes,
located in the marine environment, and
about floating containers containing
hazardous, or unknown but potentially
hazardous, substances. Solid medical
waste material such as syringes and
floating or submerged containers are
marine debris under the definition.
Hazardous material response is not
within the scope of the Act; however,
the remediation of many types of marine
debris, including hazardous materials
covered by the Comprehensive
Environmental Response and Liability
Act (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), is provided
for by a variety of statutes.
J. Comments on Consultation With the
Interagency Marine Debris Coordinating
Committee
Two commenters questioned the lack
of consensus with some members of the
IMDCC regarding the definition of
marine debris. The Act directs NOAA
and the Coast Guard to consult with the
IMDCC in developing the definition of
marine debris, and this consultation
took place at a number of quarterly
IMDCC meetings through August, 2007.
NOAA and the Coast Guard have
addressed the comments made by
IMDCC members in this preamble and
will continue to work with the IMDCC
in implementing the Act.
V. Regulatory Analyses
The Coast Guard and NOAA
developed this rule after considering
numerous statutes and executive orders
related to rulemaking. Below is a
summary of our analyses based on 13 of
these statutes or executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 170 / Thursday, September 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Public comments on the NPRM are
summarized in Section IV of this
preamble, ‘‘Discussion of Comments
and Changes.’’ NOAA and the Coast
Guard received no public comments and
made no changes that would alter the
assessment of impacts in the NPRM. A
summary of the assessment follows.
The Act requires the Coast Guard and
NOAA to jointly develop and
promulgate a definition of marine debris
for the purposes of the Act.
Accordingly, this rulemaking creates a
joint Coast Guard and NOAA definition
of the term ‘‘marine debris’’ for the
purposes of the Act. The Act does not
authorize NOAA or the Coast Guard to
undertake regulatory or management
activities of other Federal agencies.
Instead, the drafting agencies expect to
use the definition of marine debris for
the administration of research and
educational grants. Such grants may
map, identify, or assess the impacts of
marine debris.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the drafting agencies
considered whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
In the NPRM, NOAA and the Coast
Guard certified under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that the proposed rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. See
the ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’ section
of the NPRM for the complete threshold
analysis. NOAA and the Coast Guard
found no additional data or information
that would change the certification in
the NPRM.
Therefore, the Coast Guard and
NOAA certify under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
NOAA and the Coast Guard will assist
all entities, including small entities, in
understanding this rule. NOAA and the
Coast Guard do not retaliate against any
entity, including small entities, that may
question or complain about this rule or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:15 Sep 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
any policy or action of the NOAA or the
Coast Guard.
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. NOAA and the
Coast Guard have analyzed this rule
under that Order and have determined
that it does not have implications for
federalism.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, NOAA and the Coast
Guard do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
NOAA and the Coast Guard have
analyzed this rule under Executive
Order 13045, Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks. This rule is not an
economically significant rule and does
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45559
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
NOAA and the Coast Guard have
analyzed this rule under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
NOAA and the Coast Guard have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, NOAA and the
Coast Guard did not consider the use of
voluntary consensus standards.
M. Department of Commerce Docket
Number
The clearance docket number for the
Department of Commerce is:
070615197–91195–02.
N. Environment
The Coast Guard has analyzed this
rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
NOAA has analyzed the proposed rule
under NOAA Administrative Order
216–6, which sets forth NOAA’s
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
45560
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 170 / Thursday, September 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
environmental review procedures for
implementing NEPA. The agencies have
concluded that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded under section 6(b) of the
‘‘Appendix to National Environmental
Policy Act: Coast Guard Procedures for
Categorical Exclusions, Notice of Final
Agency Policy’’ (67 FR 48244, July 23,
2002) and NOAA NAO 216–6 sections
5.05 and 6.03(c)(3)(i). This rule involves
congressionally mandated regulations
designed to improve or protect the
environment. An environmental
analysis checklist and the relevant
categorical exclusion determinations are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 909
Marine resources, Marine debris,
Marine pollution, and Ocean dumping.
33 CFR Part 151
Administrative practice and
procedure, Oil pollution, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, and Water pollution
control.
NOAA signature.
Dated: August 19, 2009.
John H. Dunnigan,
Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services
and Coastal Zone Management.
Coast Guard signature.
Dated: August 20, 2009.
B.M. Salerno,
RADM, Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant
for Marine Safety, Security and Stewardship.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, NOAA adds 15 CFR part 909
and the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 151 as follows:
■ 1. 15 CFR Part 909 is added to read
as follows:
■
PART 909—MARINE DEBRIS
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1951–1958 (2006).
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
§ 909.1 Definition of marine debris for the
purposes of the Marine Debris Research,
Prevention, and Reduction Act.
(a) Marine debris. For the purposes of
the Marine Debris Research, Prevention,
and Reduction Act (33 U.S.C. 1951–
1958 (2006)) only, marine debris is
defined as any persistent solid material
that is manufactured or processed and
directly or indirectly, intentionally or
unintentionally, disposed of or
17:19 Sep 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
PART 151—VESSELS CARRYING OIL,
NOXIOUS LIQUID SUBSTANCES,
GARBAGE, MUNICIPAL OR
COMMERCIAL WASTE, AND BALLAST
WATER
2. Add Subpart E to Part 151, to read
as follows:
■
Subpart E—Definition of Marine Debris
for the purposes of the Marine Debris
Research, Prevention, and Reduction
Act
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1951–1958 (2006); 33
CFR 1.05–1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
§ 151.3000 Definition of Marine Debris for
the purposes of the Marine Debris
Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act.
(a) Marine debris. For the purposes of
the Marine Debris Research, Prevention,
and Reduction Act (33 U.S.C. 1951–
1958 (2006)) only, marine debris is
defined as any persistent solid material
that is manufactured or processed and
directly or indirectly, intentionally or
unintentionally, disposed of or
abandoned into the marine environment
or the Great Lakes.
(b) NOAA and the Coast Guard have
jointly promulgated the definition of
marine debris in this part. NOAA’s
regulation may be found in 15 CFR part
909.
[FR Doc. E9–21261 Filed 9–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JE–P; 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
20 CFR Part 655
§ 909.1 Definition of marine debris for the
purposes of the Marine Debris Research,
Prevention, and Reduction Act.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
abandoned into the marine environment
or the Great Lakes.
(b) NOAA and the Coast Guard have
jointly promulgated the definition of
marine debris in this part. Coast Guard’s
regulation may be found in 33 CFR
151.3000.
RIN 1205–AB54
Labor Certification Process and
Enforcement for Temporary
Employment in Occupations Other
Than Agriculture or Registered
Nursing in the United States (H–2B
Workers), and Other Technical
Changes; Correction
AGENCY: Employment and Training
Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Technical correction.
SUMMARY: This document contains a
correction to the Final Rule of the H–2B
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
program that was published on
December 19, 2008. The Final Rule reengineers the application filing and
review process by centralizing
processing and by enabling employers
to conduct pre-filing recruitment of
United States (U.S.) workers. In
addition, the rule enhances the integrity
of the H–2B program through the
introduction of post-adjudication audits
and procedures for penalizing
employers who fail to meet program
requirements. This rule also makes
technical changes to both the H–1B and
the permanent labor certification
program regulations to reflect
operational changes stemming from this
regulation.
DATES: This technical correction is
effective September 3, 2009. The
technical correction is applicable
beginning January 18, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information on the labor certification
process governed by this correction,
contact William L. Carlson,
Administrator, Office of Foreign Labor
Certification, Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room C–4312, Washington, DC 20210.
Telephone: (202) 693–3010 (this is not
a toll-free number). Individuals with
hearing or speech impairments may
access the telephone via TTY by calling
the toll-free Federal Information Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 19, 2008 the
Department of Labor’s (Department)
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA) published a Final
Rule titled ‘‘Labor Certification Process
and Enforcement for Temporary
Employment in Occupations Other
Than Agriculture or Registered Nursing
in the United States (H–2B Workers),
and Other Technical Changes.’’ It has
come to ETA’s attention that due to a
technical oversight a certain part of the
final regulations was deleted from the
Final Rule publication. The Department
did not intend to remove this language
from the regulations and through this
correction notice the Department seeks
to reinsert the inadvertently deleted
language.
Need for Correction
As published, the final regulation
erroneously removed a paragraph of
§ 655.731 that the Department had
intended to remain. The intention of
this Notice is to reestablish that
paragraph.
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 170 (Thursday, September 3, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45555-45560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21261]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
15 CFR Part 909
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 151
[USCG-2007-0164]
RIN 0648-AV68; 1625-AB24
Definition of Marine Debris for Purposes of the Marine Debris
Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act
AGENCY: National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce; Coast Guard, Department
of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NOAA and the Coast Guard are defining ``marine debris'' for
purposes of the Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act
(the Act). The Act requires NOAA and the Coast Guard to jointly develop
a definition and promulgate it through regulations; this rule
represents the agencies' compliance with the Act. For the purposes of
the Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act only, marine
debris is defined as any persistent solid material that is
[[Page 45556]]
manufactured or processed and directly or indirectly, intentionally or
unintentionally, disposed of or abandoned into the marine environment
or the Great Lakes.
DATES: This final rule is effective October 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and related material received from the public, as
well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG-2007-0164 and are available for
inspection and copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You also may find
this docket on the Internet by going to https://www.regulations.gov,
selecting the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, typing USCG-2007-0164 into the Docket ID box, pressing Enter,
and then clicking on the item in the Docket ID column.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call Dr. Holly A. Bamford, NOAA Marine Debris Program, telephone 301-
713-2989, or David Major, Environmental Standards Division, U.S. Coast
Guard Headquarters, telephone 202-372-1402. If you have questions about
viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Regulatory History
III. Background and Purpose
IV. Discussion of Comments and Changes
A. Comments on the Purpose of the Definition
B. Comments on ``Marine Environment''
C. Comments on ``Solid''
D. Comments on ``Persistent''
E. Comments on ``Manufactured or Processed''
F. Comments on ``Disposed of or Abandoned Into''
G. Comments on Discharges in Compliance With Law
H. Comments on Items Placed in the Marine Environment by Permit
I. Comments on Medical Waste and Hazardous Materials
J. Comments on Consultation With the Interagency Marine Debris
Coordinating Committee
V. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Department of Commerce Docket Number
N. Environment
I. Abbreviations
IMDCC Interagency Marine Debris Coordinating Committee
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
FR Federal Register
MARPOL 73/78 International Convention for the Prevention of
Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the protocol of 1978
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NOAA Program NOAA's Marine Debris Prevention and Removal Program
NOS National Ocean Service
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
NRC National Research Council
OMB Office of Management and Budget
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Regulatory History
On May 27, 2008, NOAA and the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking entitled ``Definition of Marine Debris for Purposes
of the Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Pollution Act'' in the
Federal Register (73 FR 30322). The title of the rulemaking has been
corrected by replacing the word ``pollution'' with ``reduction,'' to
reflect the correct name of the Act. NOAA and the Coast Guard received
six letters, containing a total of 24 comments, from the public, and
four letters, containing 17 comments, from Federal agencies commenting
on the proposed rule. All comments are discussed below. No public
meeting was requested and none was held.
III. Background and Purpose
As society has developed new uses for materials, particularly
plastics, the variety and quantity of items found in the marine
environment has increased dramatically. These products range from
common domestic material (e.g., bags, cups, bottles, balloons) to
industrial products (e.g., strapping bands, plastic sheeting, hard
hats, resin pellets) to lost or discarded fishing gear (e.g., nets,
buoys, traps, lines, light sticks).
In 2006, Congress passed the Marine Debris Research, Prevention,
and Reduction Act (the Act) (33 U.S.C. 1951-1958 (2006)), with the
purpose of identifying, determining the sources of, assessing,
reducing, and preventing marine debris and its adverse impacts on the
marine environment and navigation safety.
The Act makes permanent a Marine Debris Prevention and Removal
Program within NOAA (NOAA Program) that intends to reduce and prevent
the occurrence and adverse impacts of marine debris on the marine
environment and navigation safety. The NOAA Program includes mapping,
identification, impact assessment, removal, and prevention of marine
debris, with a focus on threats to living marine resources, including
commercial fisheries and species protected under the Endangered Species
Act and Marine Mammal Protection Act, and the habitat upon which they
depend. The NOAA Program uses non-regulatory measures to reduce and
prevent marine debris and the loss of fishing gear, including the
development of local or regional protocols for lost gear reduction and
prevention. Examples of such measures include new fishing gear
technology, implementation of incentives to reduce lost gear, outreach
and education to commercial users and the general public, and other
non-regulatory measures to minimize the volume of marine debris and
lost and discarded fishing gear, and to aid in its recovery. The Act
authorizes NOAA to provide grants to entities for the research,
prevention, and reduction of marine debris.
The Act requires the Coast Guard to enforce the International
Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as
modified by the 1978 Protocol (MARPOL 73/78), Annex V, and the Act to
Prevent Pollution from Ships, 33 USC 1901-1915 (1996). The Coast Guard
will continue to monitor and enforce the requirements of these acts
among the appropriate regulated industries and communities. The Coast
Guard intends to increase international cooperation to reduce marine
debris, and to maintain its voluntary reporting program in order to
ensure the reporting of damage to vessels and disruption to navigation
caused by marine debris. The Act also required the Coast Guard to
submit to Congress a report evaluating the Coast Guard's progress on
these initiatives; the report required under 33 U.S.C. 1953(b) was
completed in 2007. In addition, the Act required the Coast Guard to
obtain a report from the National Research Council (NRC) on the
effectiveness of international and domestic measures to prevent and
reduce marine debris and its impacts; this report was completed and
presented to Congress by NRC in September, 2008.
The Act also reactivated the Interagency Marine Debris Coordinating
Committee (IMDCC), an interagency Federal body responsible for
developing and recommending comprehensive and
[[Page 45557]]
multi-disciplinary approaches to reduce the sources and impacts of
marine debris to the nation's marine environment, natural resources,
public safety, and economy. The IMDCC meets quarterly to ensure
coordination of research, monitoring, education, and regulatory actions
addressing the persistent marine debris problem.
As codified in Title 33 of the United States Code, the Act requires
NOAA and the Coast Guard, in consultation with the IMDCC, to ``jointly
develop and promulgate through regulations a definition of the term
`marine debris' for the purposes of this Act.'' 33 U.S.C.
1954(b)(2006). The Act expressly limits the application of the
definition of marine debris to the implementation and requirements of
the Act. The Act does not authorize NOAA or the Coast Guard to
undertake regulatory actions other than the promulgation of this
definition, and the definition of marine debris does not affect the
regulatory or management activities of other Federal agencies.
NOAA and the Coast Guard worked together to develop and propose a
definition, taking into account both agencies' responsibilities under
the Act. The term ``marine debris'' has a variety of meanings to the
many entities working in and affecting the marine environment. The
definition promulgated by this rule, however, focuses on solid debris
from land-based and ocean-based sources. While NOAA and the Coast Guard
considered alternative definitions, this definition will allow NOAA to
consider the broadest possible range of marine debris activities for
grant and research support as provided in the Act. The definition will
also provide the Coast Guard sufficient parameters to conduct useful
and focused studies and reports required by the Act.
As required by the Act, the two agencies consulted with the IMDCC
during the development of this definition. Some IMDCC members suggested
that the definition include the term ``unauthorized'' in order to
exclude materials explicitly permitted to be discharged into the marine
environment. NOAA and the Coast Guard did not include the term
``unauthorized'' in the definition. As discussed in more detail below,
such a limited definition would be inconsistent with the objectives of
the Act, which are to identify, determine the sources of, assess,
reduce, and prevent the full range of marine debris and its adverse
effects on the marine environment and navigation safety. Authority to
dispose of or abandon material that may be considered marine debris as
defined in this regulation is not affected by the promulgation of this
definition or the implementation of the programs established pursuant
to the Act. Some IMDCC members also suggested that the definition of
marine debris be limited to debris with adverse effects on the marine
environment. NOAA and the Coast Guard did not include this limitation
because it would prevent the NOAA program from supporting or conducting
research where impacts of debris on marine resources are unknown or
uncertain. Limiting the range of research opportunities in this way
would diminish the ability of NOAA and the Coast Guard to fulfill the
objectives of the Act.
On May 27, 2008, the two agencies published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) proposing a definition of marine debris for purposes
of the Act. The proposed definition read as follows: ``For the purposes
of the Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act (33 U.S.C.
1951-1958 (2006)) only, marine debris is defined as any persistent
solid material that is manufactured or processed and directly or
indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally, disposed of or abandoned
into the marine environment or the Great Lakes.''
IV. Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard and NOAA received 10 letters containing a total of
41 comments on the proposed definition. After consideration of all the
comments, and for the reasons set out below, the Coast Guard and NOAA
adopt the proposed definition without changes.
A. Comments on the Purpose of the Definition
Several commenters approached the definition of marine debris from
an enforcement perspective, assuming that items within the definition
of marine debris would necessarily be subject to anti-pollution
mandates. An item that satisfies the definition of marine debris may,
in some cases, be addressed by anti-pollution laws that prohibit the
disposal or abandonment of the material. However, the fact that a
material satisfies the definition of marine debris does not mean its
disposal or abandonment is prohibited.
The Act does not prohibit the disposal or abandonment of marine
debris, nor does it provide regulatory authority to do so. Instead, the
Act is intended to help identify, assess, reduce, and prevent marine
debris. See Section III of this preamble for details on agency
involvement in addressing these areas. The definition of marine debris
will be used only for the implementation of the Act.
B. Comments on ``Marine Environment''
Two commenters asked what areas are included in the term ``marine
environment.'' NOAA and the Coast Guard use the term ``marine
environment'' consistently with its use in other sections of the United
States Code. The term ``marine environment'' is defined in various
parts of the United States Code to include the high seas, exclusive
economic zone, territorial sea, coastal waters, Great Lakes, navigable
waters of the United States, and the lands therein and thereunder, and
adjacent shorelines and shorelands. NOAA and the Coast Guard
specifically included the Great Lakes in the definition of marine
debris to avoid confusion. The marine environment does not include
airspace above bodies of water.
One commenter requested that the term ``marine environment'' be
replaced with the term ``aquatic environment'' in order to cover debris
originating from land-based sources via creeks and tributaries. As
explained in part F below, such debris is already addressed by the
definition.
C. Comments on ``Solid''
Three commenters asked whether specific materials they consider to
be ``semi-solid'' would be included within the definition of marine
debris, or encouraged that such materials be included. Marine debris,
pursuant to the Act, is defined as any persistent solid material and
therefore does not include semi-solids, such as tar balls and sewer
cakes. NOAA and the Coast Guard concluded that the Act was not intended
to cover materials other than solid materials. Internationally and
domestically, the generally accepted usage of ``marine debris,''
including in research, refers to solid items. For example, all of the
marine debris items catalogued in the 1988 Report of the Interagency
Task Force on Persistent Debris are solids.
D. Comments on ``Persistent''
Three commenters asked for clarification of the word ``persistent''
as used in the definition. The term ``persistent'' is intended to
capture items that degrade slowly, as noted in the CEQ Ocean Blueprint
for the 21st Century and the House Report on the Act (H.R. Rep. No.
109-332, pt. 2, at 1759 (2006)). This also is consistent with the 1988
Report of the Interagency Task Force on Persistent Debris, in which
small pieces of plastic and plastic particles are recognized as marine
[[Page 45558]]
debris. Persistency is affected by material composition, movement
within the water column, and exposure to sunlight, among other things.
The ability of marine debris to travel long distances away from the
point of origin is taken into account in considering persistency.
E. Comments on ``Manufactured or Processed''
Five commenters requested the definition be modified to include
``naturally occurring'' debris such as downed trees, or expressed
interest in the treatment of lost agricultural cargo. The Coast Guard
and NOAA concluded that organic matter that is not processed or
manufactured, that enters the marine environment, would not meet the
definition of marine debris within the context of the Act, which
focuses on manufactured and processed items. To the extent that organic
matter has been subject to manufacturing or processing, those items may
be considered marine debris if they satisfy the remainder of the
definition.
One commenter requested the definition be modified to include
materials ``intended to be processed.'' The commenter provided the
specific example of raw materials used for plastic production, namely
pre-production plastic pellets. All plastic items have been created
through a manufacturing process, as they do not exist naturally in the
environment. Therefore, plastic in any form and of any size already is
included in the definition of marine debris. Similar manufactured
persistent solids mentioned by commenters, such as golf balls, also are
considered marine debris.
F. Comments on ``Disposed of or Abandoned Into''
Commenters described a variety of means by which material can be
disposed of or abandoned into the marine environment, such as transport
by wind or storm drains, and inquired how or whether the manner of
transport affects whether or not the material is within this definition
of marine debris. The means by which material enters into marine
environment does not affect whether that material is considered marine
debris. As noted in the preamble above, a variety of both sea and
landside events and activities, such as storm water runoff, wind, or
natural disasters, may ultimately result in materials being abandoned
or disposed of in the marine environment. For that reason, the
definition of marine debris includes materials disposed of or abandoned
``directly or indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally'' into the
marine environment.
G. Comments on Discharges in Compliance With Law
Three commenters commented on whether the definition of marine
debris should include materials discharged in compliance with relevant
enforcement regimes. A persistent solid material that is manufactured
or processed, and disposed of or abandoned into the marine environment,
is considered marine debris even when the disposal or abandonment is
legally permissible. As noted above, NOAA and the Coast Guard define
marine debris exclusively for the purposes of the Act, and the Act does
not create an enforcement regime. Existing enforcement regimes
referenced in the Act, such as the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships
and MARPOL Annex V, allow the legal discharge of items into the sea.
Congress did not state in the Act or legislative history that a
definition exclude those items. Moreover, it would be impractical to
classify items based on source rather than location. For example, a tin
can located in the sea may have been discharged in accordance with
MARPOL or may have blown into the ocean from a pier. In both
circumstances, considering the tin can to be marine debris fulfills the
intent of the Act.
The Act is non-regulatory and overlaps with current enforcement
regimes established by other laws. The fact that an item is legally
disposed of or abandoned does not prevent it being studied or tracked.
Environmental goals can be achieved through non-regulatory means,
including study and the promotion of new methods to prevent, reduce,
and mitigate the effects of debris. Thus, marine debris of any type is
open for research or other activities as specified in the Act.
H. Comments on Items Placed in the Marine Environment by Permit
Four commenters raised concerns that materials placed in the marine
environment by public agencies or under permit by public agencies--such
as artificial reefs, marine structures, vessels, rigs, pipelines, and
navigational and weather buoys--may be deemed marine debris. The Coast
Guard and NOAA do not consider such items disposed of or abandoned,
because the items are intact, on station, and monitored. However, an
item or piece of an item originally placed or permitted in the marine
environment, but that subsequently breaks apart, becomes lost, or is no
longer actively monitored, could be considered disposed of or abandoned
and would meet the definition of marine debris. The Coast Guard and
NOAA emphasize that a government approval or permission for disposal or
abandonment of material into the marine environment does not exclude
that material from research, removal, or outreach activities
contemplated by the Act. For example, a tire reef off the coast of
Florida, legally placed there in 1972, has fragmented and allowed tires
to drift across the seafloor; those tires are considered marine debris
for purposes of the Act.
I. Comments on Medical Waste and Hazardous Materials
Three commenters expressed concern about medical waste, such as
syringes, located in the marine environment, and about floating
containers containing hazardous, or unknown but potentially hazardous,
substances. Solid medical waste material such as syringes and floating
or submerged containers are marine debris under the definition.
Hazardous material response is not within the scope of the Act;
however, the remediation of many types of marine debris, including
hazardous materials covered by the Comprehensive Environmental Response
and Liability Act (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), is provided for by a
variety of statutes.
J. Comments on Consultation With the Interagency Marine Debris
Coordinating Committee
Two commenters questioned the lack of consensus with some members
of the IMDCC regarding the definition of marine debris. The Act directs
NOAA and the Coast Guard to consult with the IMDCC in developing the
definition of marine debris, and this consultation took place at a
number of quarterly IMDCC meetings through August, 2007. NOAA and the
Coast Guard have addressed the comments made by IMDCC members in this
preamble and will continue to work with the IMDCC in implementing the
Act.
V. Regulatory Analyses
The Coast Guard and NOAA developed this rule after considering
numerous statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below is
a summary of our analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive
orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
[[Page 45559]]
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
Public comments on the NPRM are summarized in Section IV of this
preamble, ``Discussion of Comments and Changes.'' NOAA and the Coast
Guard received no public comments and made no changes that would alter
the assessment of impacts in the NPRM. A summary of the assessment
follows.
The Act requires the Coast Guard and NOAA to jointly develop and
promulgate a definition of marine debris for the purposes of the Act.
Accordingly, this rulemaking creates a joint Coast Guard and NOAA
definition of the term ``marine debris'' for the purposes of the Act.
The Act does not authorize NOAA or the Coast Guard to undertake
regulatory or management activities of other Federal agencies. Instead,
the drafting agencies expect to use the definition of marine debris for
the administration of research and educational grants. Such grants may
map, identify, or assess the impacts of marine debris.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the
drafting agencies considered whether this rule would have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term
``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
In the NPRM, NOAA and the Coast Guard certified under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that the proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. See the ``Regulatory
Flexibility Act'' section of the NPRM for the complete threshold
analysis. NOAA and the Coast Guard found no additional data or
information that would change the certification in the NPRM.
Therefore, the Coast Guard and NOAA certify under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), NOAA and the Coast Guard will
assist all entities, including small entities, in understanding this
rule. NOAA and the Coast Guard do not retaliate against any entity,
including small entities, that may question or complain about this rule
or any policy or action of the NOAA or the Coast Guard.
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. NOAA and the Coast Guard have
analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, NOAA
and the Coast Guard do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
NOAA and the Coast Guard have analyzed this rule under Executive
Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
NOAA and the Coast Guard have analyzed this rule under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. NOAA and the Coast Guard have
determined that it is not a ``significant energy action'' under that
order because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator
of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated
it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a
Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, NOAA and the
Coast Guard did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
M. Department of Commerce Docket Number
The clearance docket number for the Department of Commerce is:
070615197-91195-02.
N. Environment
The Coast Guard has analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and NOAA has analyzed
the proposed rule under NOAA Administrative Order 216-6, which sets
forth NOAA's
[[Page 45560]]
environmental review procedures for implementing NEPA. The agencies
have concluded that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded under section 6(b) of
the ``Appendix to National Environmental Policy Act: Coast Guard
Procedures for Categorical Exclusions, Notice of Final Agency Policy''
(67 FR 48244, July 23, 2002) and NOAA NAO 216-6 sections 5.05 and
6.03(c)(3)(i). This rule involves congressionally mandated regulations
designed to improve or protect the environment. An environmental
analysis checklist and the relevant categorical exclusion
determinations are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 909
Marine resources, Marine debris, Marine pollution, and Ocean
dumping.
33 CFR Part 151
Administrative practice and procedure, Oil pollution, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, and Water pollution control.
NOAA signature.
Dated: August 19, 2009.
John H. Dunnigan,
Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management.
Coast Guard signature.
Dated: August 20, 2009.
B.M. Salerno,
RADM, Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security and
Stewardship.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, NOAA adds 15 CFR part 909
and the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 151 as follows:
0
1. 15 CFR Part 909 is added to read as follows:
PART 909--MARINE DEBRIS
Sec. 909.1 Definition of marine debris for the purposes of the Marine
Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1951-1958 (2006).
Sec. 909.1 Definition of marine debris for the purposes of the Marine
Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act.
(a) Marine debris. For the purposes of the Marine Debris Research,
Prevention, and Reduction Act (33 U.S.C. 1951-1958 (2006)) only, marine
debris is defined as any persistent solid material that is manufactured
or processed and directly or indirectly, intentionally or
unintentionally, disposed of or abandoned into the marine environment
or the Great Lakes.
(b) NOAA and the Coast Guard have jointly promulgated the
definition of marine debris in this part. Coast Guard's regulation may
be found in 33 CFR 151.3000.
PART 151--VESSELS CARRYING OIL, NOXIOUS LIQUID SUBSTANCES, GARBAGE,
MUNICIPAL OR COMMERCIAL WASTE, AND BALLAST WATER
0
2. Add Subpart E to Part 151, to read as follows:
Subpart E--Definition of Marine Debris for the purposes of the
Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1951-1958 (2006); 33 CFR 1.05-1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 151.3000 Definition of Marine Debris for the purposes of the
Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act.
(a) Marine debris. For the purposes of the Marine Debris Research,
Prevention, and Reduction Act (33 U.S.C. 1951-1958 (2006)) only, marine
debris is defined as any persistent solid material that is manufactured
or processed and directly or indirectly, intentionally or
unintentionally, disposed of or abandoned into the marine environment
or the Great Lakes.
(b) NOAA and the Coast Guard have jointly promulgated the
definition of marine debris in this part. NOAA's regulation may be
found in 15 CFR part 909.
[FR Doc. E9-21261 Filed 9-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JE-P; 4910-15-P