Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Renewals; Vision, 45670-45671 [E9-21196]
Download as PDF
45670
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 170 / Thursday, September 3, 2009 / Notices
the exhibition: ‘‘Gifts from the
Ancestors: Ancient Ivories of Bering
Strait,’’ imported from abroad for
temporary exhibition within the United
States, are of cultural significance. The
objects are imported pursuant to loan
agreements with the foreign owners or
custodians. I also determine that the
exhibition or display of the exhibit
objects at Princeton University Art
Museum, Princeton, NJ, from on or
about October 3, 2009, until on or about
January 10, 2010, and at possible
additional exhibitions or venues yet to
be determined, is in the national
interest. Public Notice of these
Determinations is ordered to be
published in the Federal Register.
For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Julie
Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The
address is U.S. Department of State,
L/PD, SA–5, 2200 C Street, NW., Suite
5H03, Washington, DC 20522–0505.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: August 27, 2009.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional
and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E9–21310 Filed 9–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35288]
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Energy Solutions, LLC, d.b.a. Heritage
Railroad Corporation—Acquisition and
Operation Exemption—Heritage
Railroad Corporation
Energy Solutions, LLC, d.b.a. Heritage
Railroad Corporation (ES), a noncarrier,
has filed a verified notice of exemption
under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire from
the United States Department of Energy
(DOE), and to operate a rail line
approximately 7 miles long between
milepost 0.0, at a point of connection
with a rail line of Norfolk Southern
Railway Company, at Blair, TN, and the
end of the line at milepost 7.0, at or near
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:27 Sep 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
Oak Ridge, TN.1 This line also includes
approximately 3 miles of spur tracks.2
The transaction is expected to be
consummated on or after September 17,
2009 (30 days after the exemption was
filed).
ES certifies that its projected annual
revenues as a result of this transaction
will not result in ES becoming a Class
II or Class I rail carrier. ES further
certifies that its projected annual
revenues upon becoming a Class III
carrier will not exceed $5 million.
Pursuant to the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law
110–161, section 193, 121 Stat. 1844
(2007), nothing in this decision
authorizes the following activities at any
solid waste rail transfer facility:
Collecting, storing, or transferring solid
waste outside of its original shipping
container; or separating or processing
solid waste (including baling, crushing,
compacting, and shredding). The term
‘‘solid waste’’ is defined in section 1004
of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42
U.S.C. 6903.
If the notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions to stay must be
filed no later than September 10, 2009
(at least 7 days before the exemption
becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 35288, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, one copy of each
pleading must be served on Thomas F.
McFarland, Thomas F. McFarland, P.C.,
208 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1890,
Chicago, IL 60604–1112.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: August 28, 2009.
1 Heritage
Railroad Corporation, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Community Reuse Organization of
East Tennessee, currently operates the line pursuant
to a perpetual easement for a railroad right-of-way
granted by the DOE. See Heritage Railroad
Corporation—Lease and Operation Exemption—
Rail Line of United States Department of Energy,
STB Finance Docket No. 34372 (STB served July 23,
2003).
2 On August 21, 2009, ES filed a corrected
verified notice of exemption stating that there are
approximately 3 miles of spur tracks more or less,
rather than 7.5 miles as erroneously stated.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–21267 Filed 9–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2001–9258; FMCSA–
2001–9561; FMCSA–2003–15268; FMCSA–
2007–27333]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Renewals; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
SUMMARY: FMCSA previously
announced its decision to renew the
exemptions from the vision requirement
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations for 20 individuals. FMCSA
has statutory authority to exempt
individuals from the vision requirement
if the exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has
concluded that granting these
exemptions will provide a level of safety
that will be equivalent to, or greater
than, the level of safety maintained
without the exemptions for these
commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64–
224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://
www.regulations.gov
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ The statute also
allows the Agency to renew exemptions
at the end of the 2-year period. The
comment period ended on August 17,
2009.
E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM
03SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 170 / Thursday, September 3, 2009 / Notices
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this
proceeding.
Conclusion
The Agency has not received any
adverse evidence on any of these drivers
that indicates that safety is being
compromised. Based upon its
evaluation of the 20 renewal
applications, FMCSA renews the
Federal vision exemptions for Morris R.
Beebe, II, James A. Busbin, Jr., Domenic
J. Carassai, Fred W. Duran, Bruce E.
Hemmer, Steven P. Holden, Russell R.
Inlow, Christopher G. Jarvela, Donald L.
Jensen, Darrell D. Kropf, Brad L.
Mathna, Vincent P. Miller, Warren J.
Nyland, Dennis M. Prevas, Greg L. Riles,
Robert N. Taylor, Calvin D. Tomlinson,
Wesley E. Turner, Mona J. VanKrieken,
and Paul S. Yocum.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each renewal exemption will
be valid for 2 years unless revoked
earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will
be revoked if: (1) The person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
Issued on: August 27, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–21196 Filed 9–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35283]
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
The Indiana Rail Road Company—
Trackage Rights Exemption—CSX
Transportation, Inc.
Pursuant to a written trackage rights
agreement (Agreement),1 CSX
Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), has agreed
to grant non-exclusive overhead
trackage rights to The Indiana Rail Road
Company (INRD) over CSXT’s: (1)
Indianapolis Belt Subdivision between
the connection of INRD with CSXT at
CSXT MP QIB 5.3 and the Hoosier
Heritage Railroad in the vicinity of
CSXT MP QIB 13.5, a distance of
approximately 8.2 miles; (2) Hamilton
Connection between CSXT MP QIB 9.0,
1 As
required by 49 CFR 1180.6(a)(7)(ii), INRD
states that it will submit a copy of the executed
agreement within 10 days of the date the agreement
is executed.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:27 Sep 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
approximately, and the point of INRD’s
State Street Yard leased property in the
vicinity of CSXT’s Indianapolis
Subdivision MP BD 122.0, a distance of
approximately 0.5 miles; (3) Hamilton
and Prospect Wye Tracks in the vicinity
of CSXT MP QIB 9.0 for the purpose of
entry into and exit from CSXT’s
Hawthorne Yard; (4) Indianapolis
Subdivision between Hamilton
Connection at CSXT MP BD 122.0
approximately, and CP IU at CSXT MP
BD 126.5, a distance of approximately
4.5 miles; (5) Indianapolis Terminal
Subdivision between CP IU at CSXT MP
QI 283.7 and CP AN at the west end of
CSXT’s Avon Yard at CSXT MP QS
12.5, a distance of approximately 12.7
miles; (6) Louisville Secondary
Subdivision between CSXT MP QSL 4.0
at the connection with Louisville &
Indiana Railroad Co. (LIRC) and CSXT
MP QSL 0.0, a distance of 4 miles,
including use of wye tracks in the
northeast and southeast quadrants at CP
Dale, and wye tracks in the southeast
and southwest quadrants at CP IU; (7)
Crawfordsville Branch between CP IJ at
CSXT MP QSC 0.7 and the connection
to the Indianapolis Terminal
Subdivision at CP South Hunt at CSXT
MP QSC 8.6, a distance of
approximately 7.9 miles; and (8)
Shelbyville Secondary Subdivision
between the connection with the
Indianapolis Belt Subdivision at CSXT
MP QSS 106.9 and CP IU at CSXT MP
QSS 109.3, a distance of approximately
2.4 miles.
The transaction is scheduled to be
consummated on September 18, 2009,
or the effective date of the exemption
(30 days after the amendment to the
notice of exemption was filed),
whichever is later. The purpose of the
trackage rights agreement is (i) to grant
INRD trackage rights which will permit
INRD to deliver and retrieve carload
haulage traffic to and from LIRC at
CSXT’s Avon Yard,2 (ii) to grant INRD
trackage rights which will permit it to
deliver and retrieve unit train haulage
traffic directly to and from LIRC, (iii) to
confirm INRD’s rights to serve
customers in State Street Yard where it
operates a plastics transloading facility
on track leased from CSXT, and (iv) to
revise the commercial terms of an
existing trackage rights agreement.3
According to INRD, the trackage rights
granted in the Agreement will permit
several routings for INRD’s traffic
2 INRD notes that it already interchanges traffic
with CSXT at Avon Yard pursuant to an
interchange agreement between the parties.
3 See The Indiana Rail Road Company—Trackage
Rights Exemption—Consolidated Rail Corporation,
STB Finance Docket No. 33380 (STB served Apr.
30, 1997).
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45671
moving to and from Avon Yard for
delivery or retrieval of haulage traffic
with LIRC, providing CSXT’s
dispatchers with the greatest flexibility
in routing INRD traffic to and from
Avon Yard through the congested
Indianapolis Terminal area.
As a condition to this exemption, any
employees affected by the trackage
rights will be protected by the
conditions imposed in Norfolk and
Western Ry. Co.—Trackage Rights—BN,
354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as modified in
Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.—Lease and
Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980).
This notice is filed under 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(7). If the notice contains false
or misleading information, the
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C.
10502(d) may be filed at any time. The
filing of a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Stay petitions must be
filed at least 7 days before the
exemption becomes effective.
Pursuant to the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law
110–161, section 193, 121 Stat. 1844
(2007), nothing in this decision
authorizes the following activities at any
solid waste rail transfer facility:
collecting, storing, or transferring solid
waste outside of its original shipping
container; or separating or processing
solid waste (including baling, crushing,
compacting, and shredding). The term
‘‘solid waste’’ is defined in section 1004
of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42
U.S.C. 6903.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 35283, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, a copy of each
pleading must be served on John
Broadley, John H. Broadley &
Associates, P.C., 1054 31st Street, NW.,
Suite 200, Washington, DC 20007.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: August 27, 2009.
By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–21048 Filed 9–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM
03SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 170 (Thursday, September 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45670-45671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21196]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2001-9258; FMCSA-2001-9561; FMCSA-2003-15268; FMCSA-
2007-27333]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Renewals; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA previously announced its decision to renew the
exemptions from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations for 20 individuals. FMCSA has statutory authority to
exempt individuals from the vision requirement if the exemptions
granted will not compromise safety. The Agency has concluded that
granting these exemptions will provide a level of safety that will be
equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety maintained without
the exemptions for these commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202) 366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64-224, Washington,
DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://www.regulations.gov
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
for a 2-year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that
would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also allows the
Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period. The comment
period ended on August 17, 2009.
[[Page 45671]]
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this proceeding.
Conclusion
The Agency has not received any adverse evidence on any of these
drivers that indicates that safety is being compromised. Based upon its
evaluation of the 20 renewal applications, FMCSA renews the Federal
vision exemptions for Morris R. Beebe, II, James A. Busbin, Jr.,
Domenic J. Carassai, Fred W. Duran, Bruce E. Hemmer, Steven P. Holden,
Russell R. Inlow, Christopher G. Jarvela, Donald L. Jensen, Darrell D.
Kropf, Brad L. Mathna, Vincent P. Miller, Warren J. Nyland, Dennis M.
Prevas, Greg L. Riles, Robert N. Taylor, Calvin D. Tomlinson, Wesley E.
Turner, Mona J. VanKrieken, and Paul S. Yocum.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each renewal
exemption will be valid for 2 years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA.
The exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was
granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
Issued on: August 27, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9-21196 Filed 9-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P