TRICARE; Diabetic Education, 44798-44800 [E9-20684]
Download as PDF
44798
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires each Federal agency prepare,
and make available for public comment,
a regulatory flexibility analysis when
the agency issues a regulation which
would have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule will not significantly
affect a substantial number of small
entities for purposes of the RFA.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule will not impose significant
additional information collection
requirements on the public under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3511). Existing information
collection requirements of the TRICARE
and Medicare programs will be utilized.
approved device; any use that is not
included in the cleared statement of
intended use for a device that has been
determined by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) to be
substantially equivalent to a legally
marketed predicate device and cleared
for marketing; and any use of a device
for which a manufacturer or distributor
would be required to seek pre-market
review by the FDA in order to legally
include that use in the device’s labeling.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 199.4 is amended by
revising the third paragraph of the Note
to paragraph (g)(15)(i)(A), and removing
paragraph (g)(15)(iv) as follows:
§ 199.4
*
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Basic program benefits.
*
*
(g) * * *
(15) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
*
*
This proposed rule has been
examined for its impact under E.O.
13132 and it does not contain policies
that have federalism implications that
would have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government; therefore,
consultation with State and local
officials is not required.
Note: * * * CHAMPUS will consider
coverage of off-label uses of drugs and
devices that meet the definition of Off-Label
Use of a Drug or Device in Section 199.2(b).
Approval for reimbursement of off-label uses
requires review for medical necessity, and
also requires demonstrations from reliable
evidence, as defined in § 199.2, that the offlabel use of the drug or device is safe,
effective and in accordance with nationally
accepted standards of practice in the medical
community.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Dated: August 21, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9–20683 Filed 8–28–09; 8:45 am]
Claims, dental health, health care,
health insurance, individuals with
disabilities, Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
PART 199—[AMENDED]
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 199 continues to read as follows:
Office of the Secretary
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter
55.
2. Section 199.2(b) is amended by
removing the definition of Unlabeled or
Off-Label Drugs and adding a new
definition of Off-Label Use of a Drug or
Device in alphabetical order to read as
follows:
§ 199.2
Definitions.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Off-Label Use of a Drug or Device. A
use other than an intended use for
which the drug or device is legally
marketed under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act. This includes any
use that is not included in the approved
labeling for an approved drug or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
32 CFR Part 199
[DoD–2009–HA–0094]
RIN 0720–AB32
TRICARE; Diabetic Education
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is
publishing this proposed rule to clarify
TRICARE coverage for diabetic
education. This rule introduces new
definitions and addresses revisions or
omissions in policy or procedure
inadvertently missed in previous
regulatory changes pertaining to
diabetic education.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DATES: Written comments received at
the address indicated below by October
30, 2009 will be accepted.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
and title, by either of the following
methods:
The Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, Room 3C843 Pentagon,
1160 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy
Saly, Medical Benefits and
Reimbursement Branch, TRICARE
Management Activity, telephone (303)
676–3742. Questions regarding payment
of specific claims should be addressed
to the appropriate TRICARE contractor.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed rule introduces new
definitions and addresses revisions or
omissions in policy or procedure
inadvertently missed in previous
regulatory changes pertaining to
diabetic education.
Diabetes self-management training is
an interactive, collaborative process
involving beneficiaries with diabetes,
their physician(s) and their educators.
The educational process should provide
the beneficiary with the knowledge and
skills needed to perform self-care,
manage crises, and make lifestyle
changes required to manage the diabetes
successfully.
TRICARE had previously classified
diabetes self-management training as a
counseling service that was not
medically necessary. Since all services
provided under the TRICARE program
must be medically necessary and
appropriate, diabetes self-management
training was excluded from coverage. In
developing the TRICARE policy on selfmanagement, however, it was
determined that diabetes educational
services are consistent with the
medically necessary and appropriate
provision and it was decided to conform
with Medicare’s policy on diabetes selfmanagement training. As such,
TRICARE removed ‘‘diabetic self-
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Proposed Rules
management training’’ programs as an
excluded benefit effective July 1, 1998.
Although the policy change conflicted
with existing regulation language,
TRICARE determined to move forward
with the policy change because
TRICARE was expanding and not
restricting a benefit, and the change was
in line with Medicare’s benefit. This
proposed rule corrects the failure to
amend the language of the regulation
and brings the regulation into
conformance with the current policy.
Sec. 199.4 provides basic program
benefits.
Sec. 199.4(d)(3)(xiv) Diabetic SelfManagement Training (DSMT) is added
as a benefit under other covered services
and supplies. This addition brings the
regulation into conformance with the
current policy.
Sec. 199.4(g)(39) is revised to remove
diabetic self-education programs as an
exclusion.
Sec. 199.6 addresses authorized
providers.
Sec. 199.6(c)(3)(iii)(L) adds
Nutritionist to the list of individual
professional providers of medical care
authorized to provide services to
CHAMPUS beneficiaries.
Sec.199.6(c)(3)(iii)(M) adds Registered
Dietitian to the list of individual
professional providers of medical care
authorized to provide services to
CHAMPUS beneficiaries.
Regulatory Procedures.
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
Section 801 of title 5, United States
Code, and Executive Order 12866
require certain regulatory assessments
and procedures for any major rule or
significant regulatory action, defined as
one that would result in an annual effect
of $100 million or more on the national
economy or which would have other
substantial impacts. It has been certified
that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601)
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601),
requires that each Federal agency
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
when the agency issues a regulation
which would have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule will not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, this proposed rule is not
subject to the requirements of the RFA.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
44799
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
requires that an impact analysis be
performed to determine whether the
rule has federalism implications that
would have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. It has been
certified that this proposed rule does
not have federalism implications, as set
forth in Executive Order 13132.
about the successful self-management of
diabetes. It includes the following
criteria: education about self-monitoring
of blood glucose, diet, and exercise; an
insulin treatment plan developed
specifically for the patient who is
insulin-dependent; and motivates the
patient to use the skills for selfmanagement. The DSMT service or
program must be accredited by the
American Diabetes Association.
Coverage limitations on the provision of
this benefit will be as determined by the
Director, TRICARE Management
Activity, or designee.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(39) Counseling. Counseling services
that are not medically necessary in the
treatment of a diagnosed medical
condition: For example, educational
counseling, vocational counseling,
nutritional counseling, and counseling
for socioeconomic purposes, stress
management, lifestyle modification, etc.
Services provided by a certified
marriage and family therapist, pastoral
or mental health counselor in the
treatment of a mental disorder are
covered only as specifically provided in
§ 199.6. Services provided by
alcoholism rehabilitation counselors are
covered only when rendered in a
CHAMPUS-authorized treatment setting
and only when the cost of those services
is included in the facility’s CHAMPUSdetermined allowable cost rate.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 199.6 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(3)(iii)(L) and (M).
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
§ 199.6
Claims, Dental health, Health care,
Health insurance, Individuals with
disabilities, Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
*
This rule does not contain a
‘‘collection of information’’
requirement, and will not impose
additional information collection
requirements on the public under Public
Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction
Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Public Law 104–4, Section 202,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
Section 202 of Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act,’’
requires that an analysis be performed
to determine whether any federal
mandate may result in the expenditure
by State, local and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector
of $100 million in any one year. It has
been certified that this proposed rule
does not contain a Federal mandate that
may result in the expenditure by State,
local and tribal governments, in
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year,
and thus this proposed rule is not
subject to this requirement.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
PART 199—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 199
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. Chapter
55.
2. Section 199.4 is amended by
adding paragraph (d)(3)(ix), and revising
paragraph (g)(39) to read as follows:
§ 199.4
Basic program benefits.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(ix) Diabetes Self-Management
Training (DSMT). A training service or
program that educates diabetic patients
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
TRICARE—authorized providers.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) * * *
(L) Nutritionist. A nutritionist may
provide diabetes self-management
training (DSMT) via an accredited
DSMT program. The nutritionist must
be licensed by the State in which the
care is provided, and must be under the
supervision of a physician who is
overseeing the DSMT program.
(M) Registered Dietitian. A dietitian
may provide diabetes self-management
training (DSMT) via an accredited
DSMT program. The dietitian must be
licensed by the State in which the care
is provided, and must be under the
supervision of a physician who is
overseeing the DSMT program.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
44800
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Dated: August 21, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9–20684 Filed 8–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[DoD–2009–HA–0095]
RIN 0720–AB33
TRICARE; Extended Care Health
Option
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is
publishing this proposed rule to
implement the requirements enacted by
Congress in Section 732 of the Duncan
Hunter National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2009 which changes
the limit of the Government’s share of
providing certain benefits under the
Extended Care Health Option (ECHO)
from $2,500 per month to $36,000 per
year, and for other non-legislated
changes to the ECHO.
DATES: Comments received at the
address indicated below by October 30,
2009 will be accepted.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
number and title, by either of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, Room 3C843 Pentagon,
1160 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Kottyan, TRICARE
Management Activity, Medical Benefits
and Reimbursement Branch, telephone
(303) 676–3520.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
I. Background
Section 1079 of title 10, United States
Code (U.S.C.), as amended by Section
701(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002
[Pub. L. 107–107], required the
Department of Defense to establish a
program of extended benefits for eligible
dependents. That program, known as
the Extended Care Heath Option
(ECHO), replaced the Program for
Persons with Disabilities (PFPWD) and
was implemented on September 1, 2005.
The primary purpose of the ECHO is to
provide eligible beneficiaries with
benefits that are not available through
the TRICARE Basic Program. The term
‘‘eligible beneficiary’’ means an
individual who is a dependent of an
Active Duty Service Member (ADSM) or
is a Transitional Survivor of a deceased
ADSM and who has a qualifying
condition. Qualifying conditions
include moderate or severe mental
retardation, serious physical disability,
or an extraordinary physical or
psychological condition. The benefits
available through the ECHO are
intended to assist in the reduction of the
disabling effects of an ECHO qualifying
condition.
Section 1079(e)(3) and (4) authorized
benefits, including training,
rehabilitation, special education,
assistive technology devices,
institutional care in private, nonprofit,
public, and State institutions and
facilities and, if appropriate,
transportation to and from such
institutions and facilities in which the
beneficiary is receiving institutional
care.
Section 1079(f)(2) limited the
Government’s liability for benefits
authorized by Section 1079(e) and (4) to
$2,500 per month and required that the
beneficiary’s sponsor be liable for any
amount of the monthly total cost for
those benefits that exceeded the
Government’s limit. Section 1079(e) also
authorized the extended benefits
program to provide additional benefits
including diagnostic services, inpatient
and outpatient care, comprehensive
home health care, respite care, and other
services and supplies as determined
appropriate by the Secretary. However,
Section 1079(f) did not limit the
Government’s liability for those
additional benefits. By Final Rule
published in the Federal Register on
August 20, 2004, (69 FR 51559) the
Department established that those
additional benefits accrued to the
$2,500 per month limit.
Section 732 of the Duncan Hunter
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2009 [Public Law 110–417]
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(NDAA 2009) changed the limit of the
Government’s liability for benefits
authorized under Section 1079(e)(3) and
(4) from $2,500 per month to $36,000
per year, prorated as determined by the
Secretary. This rule does not prorate the
annual limit of Government liability.
Section 732 does not affect other
benefits authorized under Section
1079(e).
This proposed rule changes the
Government’s share of providing all
benefits available through the Extended
Care Health Option from $2,500 per
month to $36,000 per fiscal year. This
rule does not change the Government’s
liability for benefits provided by the
ECHO Home Health Care (EHHC)
benefit or the EHHC Respite Care
benefit.
Additionally, Section 732 changed the
sponsor’s liability for costs exceeding
the limit of the Government’s liability
from a per-month basis to a per-year
basis; this rule includes that change.
The following additional changes
contained in this rule are further
discussed below: deletes references to
the PFPWD, eliminates allocating the
allowable cost of durable equipment
authorized for purchase through the
ECHO, clarifies the monthly
reimbursement for benefits received
through the ECHO Home Health Care
(EHHC), and allows a waiver of the
requirement to enroll in the sponsor’s
branch of Service Exceptional Family
Member Program (EFMP) in order to
register in the ECHO.
Active Duty Family Members who
have a qualifying condition are eligible
to receive benefits through the ECHO.
Qualifying conditions include moderate
or severe mental retardation, a serious
physical disability, or an extraordinary
physical or psychological condition
such that the beneficiary is homebound.
Serious physical disabilities include
those conditions that preclude an
individual from the unaided
performance of at least one major life
activity such as breathing, cognition,
hearing, seeing, and age appropriate
ability essential to bathing, dressing,
eating, grooming, speaking, stair use,
toilet use, transferring, and walking.
The ECHO, as the replacement for the
PFPWD, has been fully implemented for
several years; it is therefore appropriate
to delete references in the regulations to
the transition of the PFPWD to the
ECHO.
Durable equipment, which is defined
as a device or apparatus which does not
qualify as ‘‘Durable Medical
Equipment’’ under the TRICARE Basic
Program but which is essential to the
efficient arrest or reduction of the
functional loss resulting from, or the
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 167 (Monday, August 31, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44798-44800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20684]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[DoD-2009-HA-0094]
RIN 0720-AB32
TRICARE; Diabetic Education
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing this proposed rule to
clarify TRICARE coverage for diabetic education. This rule introduces
new definitions and addresses revisions or omissions in policy or
procedure inadvertently missed in previous regulatory changes
pertaining to diabetic education.
DATES: Written comments received at the address indicated below by
October 30, 2009 will be accepted.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title, by either of the
following methods:
The Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, Room 3C843 Pentagon,
1160 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or RIN for this Federal Register document. The
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Saly, Medical Benefits and
Reimbursement Branch, TRICARE Management Activity, telephone (303) 676-
3742. Questions regarding payment of specific claims should be
addressed to the appropriate TRICARE contractor.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule introduces new
definitions and addresses revisions or omissions in policy or procedure
inadvertently missed in previous regulatory changes pertaining to
diabetic education.
Diabetes self-management training is an interactive, collaborative
process involving beneficiaries with diabetes, their physician(s) and
their educators. The educational process should provide the beneficiary
with the knowledge and skills needed to perform self-care, manage
crises, and make lifestyle changes required to manage the diabetes
successfully.
TRICARE had previously classified diabetes self-management training
as a counseling service that was not medically necessary. Since all
services provided under the TRICARE program must be medically necessary
and appropriate, diabetes self-management training was excluded from
coverage. In developing the TRICARE policy on self-management, however,
it was determined that diabetes educational services are consistent
with the medically necessary and appropriate provision and it was
decided to conform with Medicare's policy on diabetes self-management
training. As such, TRICARE removed ``diabetic self-
[[Page 44799]]
management training'' programs as an excluded benefit effective July 1,
1998. Although the policy change conflicted with existing regulation
language, TRICARE determined to move forward with the policy change
because TRICARE was expanding and not restricting a benefit, and the
change was in line with Medicare's benefit. This proposed rule corrects
the failure to amend the language of the regulation and brings the
regulation into conformance with the current policy.
Sec. 199.4 provides basic program benefits.
Sec. 199.4(d)(3)(xiv) Diabetic Self-Management Training (DSMT) is
added as a benefit under other covered services and supplies. This
addition brings the regulation into conformance with the current
policy.
Sec. 199.4(g)(39) is revised to remove diabetic self-education
programs as an exclusion.
Sec. 199.6 addresses authorized providers.
Sec. 199.6(c)(3)(iii)(L) adds Nutritionist to the list of
individual professional providers of medical care authorized to provide
services to CHAMPUS beneficiaries.
Sec.199.6(c)(3)(iii)(M) adds Registered Dietitian to the list of
individual professional providers of medical care authorized to provide
services to CHAMPUS beneficiaries.
Regulatory Procedures.
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
Section 801 of title 5, United States Code, and Executive Order
12866 require certain regulatory assessments and procedures for any
major rule or significant regulatory action, defined as one that would
result in an annual effect of $100 million or more on the national
economy or which would have other substantial impacts. It has been
certified that this rule is not a significant regulatory action.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601)
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (RFA) (5 U.S.C.
601), requires that each Federal agency prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis when the agency issues a regulation which would
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Therefore, this proposed rule is not subject
to the requirements of the RFA.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule does not contain a ``collection of information''
requirement, and will not impose additional information collection
requirements on the public under Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork
Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Public Law 104-4, Section 202, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
Section 202 of Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act,''
requires that an analysis be performed to determine whether any federal
mandate may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million
in any one year. It has been certified that this proposed rule does not
contain a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State,
local and tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $100 million or more in any one year, and thus this proposed rule is
not subject to this requirement.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' requires that an impact
analysis be performed to determine whether the rule has federalism
implications that would have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. It has been certified that this proposed rule
does not have federalism implications, as set forth in Executive Order
13132.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care, Health insurance, Individuals
with disabilities, Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 199--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 199 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. Chapter 55.
2. Section 199.4 is amended by adding paragraph (d)(3)(ix), and
revising paragraph (g)(39) to read as follows:
Sec. 199.4 Basic program benefits.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(ix) Diabetes Self-Management Training (DSMT). A training service
or program that educates diabetic patients about the successful self-
management of diabetes. It includes the following criteria: education
about self-monitoring of blood glucose, diet, and exercise; an insulin
treatment plan developed specifically for the patient who is insulin-
dependent; and motivates the patient to use the skills for self-
management. The DSMT service or program must be accredited by the
American Diabetes Association. Coverage limitations on the provision of
this benefit will be as determined by the Director, TRICARE Management
Activity, or designee.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(39) Counseling. Counseling services that are not medically
necessary in the treatment of a diagnosed medical condition: For
example, educational counseling, vocational counseling, nutritional
counseling, and counseling for socioeconomic purposes, stress
management, lifestyle modification, etc. Services provided by a
certified marriage and family therapist, pastoral or mental health
counselor in the treatment of a mental disorder are covered only as
specifically provided in Sec. 199.6. Services provided by alcoholism
rehabilitation counselors are covered only when rendered in a CHAMPUS-
authorized treatment setting and only when the cost of those services
is included in the facility's CHAMPUS-determined allowable cost rate.
* * * * *
3. Section 199.6 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(3)(iii)(L) and
(M).
Sec. 199.6 TRICARE--authorized providers.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) * * *
(L) Nutritionist. A nutritionist may provide diabetes self-
management training (DSMT) via an accredited DSMT program. The
nutritionist must be licensed by the State in which the care is
provided, and must be under the supervision of a physician who is
overseeing the DSMT program.
(M) Registered Dietitian. A dietitian may provide diabetes self-
management training (DSMT) via an accredited DSMT program. The
dietitian must be licensed by the State in which the care is provided,
and must be under the supervision of a physician who is overseeing the
DSMT program.
* * * * *
[[Page 44800]]
Dated: August 21, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-20684 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P