Arbitration for Public Assistance Determinations Related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (Disasters DR-1603, DR-1604, DR-1605, DR-1606, and DR-1607), 44761-44769 [E9-19994]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 206
[Docket ID FEMA–2009–0006]
RIN 1660–AA63
Arbitration for Public Assistance
Determinations Related to Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita (Disasters DR–1603,
DR–1604, DR–1605, DR–1606, and DR–
1607)
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(ARRA), this final rule establishes an
option for arbitration under the Public
Assistance program administered by the
Federal Emergency Management
Agency. Public Assistance grant award
determinations related to Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita under major disaster
declarations DR–1603, DR–1604, DR–
1605, DR–1606, and DR–1607 are
eligible for arbitration, within the limits
set by this rule.
DATES: Effective Date: August 31, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tod
Wells, Deputy Director, Public
Assistance Division, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington DC, 20472–3100, (phone)
202–646–3936, or (e-mail)
tod.wells@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
I. Background
A. Public Assistance Process for Project
Approval
Under the Public Assistance program,
authorized by the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act 1 (Stafford Act), the
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) awards grants to State and local
governments, Indian Tribal
governments, and certain private
nonprofit organizations (‘‘eligible
applicant’’—44 CFR 206.222) to assist
them to respond to and recover from
Presidentially-declared emergencies and
major disasters as quickly as possible.
Specifically, the program provides
assistance for debris removal,
emergency protective measures, and
permanent restoration of infrastructure.
When the President declares an
1 Disaster Relief Act of 1974, Public Law 93–288,
88 Stat. 143 (May 22, 1974), as amended, 42 U.S.C.
5121 et seq.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:16 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
emergency or major disaster declaration
for a State, authorizing the Public
Assistance program, an eligible
applicant may apply for Public
Assistance. The applicant submits a
Request for Public Assistance (FEMA
Form 90–49) to FEMA through the
Grantee, which is usually the State, but
may be an Indian Tribal government. An
eligible applicant may be a State agency,
a local or Tribal government, or a
private nonprofit organization. See 44
CFR 206.222. Upon award, the Grantee
notifies the applicant of the award, and
the applicant becomes a subgrantee.
The basis for the Public Assistance
grant is a project worksheet. The project
worksheet documents the details of the
project, which is a logical grouping of
work required as a result of a declared
major disaster or emergency. A project
may include eligible work at several
sites, and may include more than one
project worksheet. A project worksheet
is the primary form used to document
the location, damage description and
dimensions, scope of work, and cost
estimate for each project. The Office of
Management and Budget has approved
the project worksheet form (FEMA Form
90–91) under information collection
number 1660–0017. When the scope of
work or estimated costs of a project
change, FEMA generates an additional
version of the project worksheet. It is
not uncommon to have several versions
of a project worksheet for one project, as
it may be difficult to predict costs and
scope of work at the beginning of a
project.
FEMA divides applications for Public
Assistance into two groups—large
projects and small projects—based on
the dollar amount of the project. The
threshold for large and small projects is
adjusted annually to reflect changes in
the Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers published by the United
States Department of Labor. The
threshold for small projects in Fiscal
Year 2005 (Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
occurred in Fiscal Year 2005) was
$55,500. The project worksheet process
is slightly different for these two types
of projects. Since the arbitration process
applies only to large projects totaling
more than $500,000, this rulemaking
will address the process for reviewing
project worksheets for large projects.
Project worksheets for large projects
are developed by a FEMA Project
Specialist, working with the applicant/
subgrantee, and are submitted directly
to a FEMA Public Assistance
Coordinator (PAC) Crew Leader for
review and processing. Although large
projects are funded on documented
actual costs, work typically is not
complete at the time of project approval.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44761
Therefore, FEMA obligates large project
grants based on estimated costs. The
obligation process is the process by
which funds are made available to the
Grantee. The funds reside in a Federal
account until drawn down by the
Grantee and paid to the applicant/
subgrantee. When the applicant/
subgrantee or Grantee disagree with
FEMA’s determination about whether a
cost is eligible for reimbursement or
reasonable, among other project
worksheet determinations, FEMA
provides an appeals process to
adjudicate such disputes.
B. Public Assistance Appeal Process
Under 44 CFR 206.206
Traditionally, under the appeals
procedures in 44 CFR 206.206, an
eligible applicant, subgrantee, or
Grantee may appeal any determination
made by FEMA related to an application
for or the provision of Public
Assistance. There are two levels of
appeal. The first level appeal is to the
FEMA Regional Administrator. The
second level appeal is to the FEMA
Assistant Administrator for the Disaster
Assistance Directorate. Typical appeals
involve disputes regarding whether an
applicant, facility, item of work, or
project is eligible for Public Assistance,
whether approved costs are sufficient to
complete the work, whether a requested
time extension was properly denied,
whether a portion of the cost claimed
for the work is eligible, or whether the
approved scope of work is correct.
An applicant/subgrantee appellant
must file an appeal with the Grantee
within 60 days of the appellant’s receipt
of a notice of the determination that is
being appealed. The appellant must
provide documented justification to
support the position of the appellant.
This documentation should specify the
monetary amount in dispute and the
provisions in Federal law, regulation, or
policy with which the appellant
believes the initial action was
inconsistent. The Grantee reviews and
evaluates the appeal documentation.
The Grantee then prepares a written
recommendation on the merits of the
appeal and forwards that
recommendation to the FEMA Regional
Administrator within 60 days of its
receipt of the appeal. The Grantee need
not endorse the appeal position but
must forward all appeals it receives.
The Regional Administrator reviews
the appeal and takes one of two actions:
(1) Renders a decision on the appeal and
informs the Grantee of the decision; or
(2) requests additional information. The
appellant may be granted 60 days to
provide any additional information, and
the Regional Administrator provides a
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
44762
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
decision on the appeal within 90 days
of receipt of that information. If the
appeal is granted, the Regional
Administrator takes appropriate action,
such as approving additional funding,
denying additional funding, or sending
a Project Specialist to meet with the
appellant to determine additional
eligible funding.
If the Regional Administrator denies
the appeal, the appellant may submit a
second appeal. The appellant must
submit the second appeal to the Grantee
within 60 days of receiving notice of the
Regional Administrator’s decision. The
Grantee must forward the second level
appeal with a written recommendation
to the Regional Administrator within 60
days of receiving the second appeal. The
Regional Administrator reviews the
information provided with the second
appeal and requests additional
information if necessary. The Regional
Administrator forwards the second
appeal with a recommendation for
action to the FEMA Assistant
Administrator as soon as practicable.
The FEMA Assistant Administrator
for the Disaster Assistance Directorate
reviews the second appeal and renders
a decision or requests additional
information from the appellant. In a
case involving highly technical issues,
FEMA may request an independent
scientific or technical analysis by a
group or person having expertise in the
subject matter of the appeal. Upon
receipt of requested information from
the appellant and any other requested
reports, FEMA renders a decision on the
second appeal within 90 days. This
decision constitutes the final
administrative decision of FEMA. See
44 CFR 206.206(e)(3).
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
C. The American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009
The President signed the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(ARRA or Act), Public Law 111–5, into
law on February 17, 2009. Section 601
of the ARRA requires the President to
establish an arbitration panel under
FEMA’s Public Assistance program to
expedite recovery efforts from
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita within the
Gulf Coast region. The ARRA further
requires the arbitration panel to have
sufficient authority regarding the award
or denial of disputed Public Assistance
applications for covered hurricane
damage under sections 403, 406, or 407
of the Stafford Act. The ARRA limits
arbitration to projects that total more
than $500,000. By memorandum dated
August 6, 2009, the President assigned
to the Secretary of the U.S. Department
of Homeland Security the function of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:16 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
the President under section 601. See 74
FR 40055 (Aug. 10, 2009).
Three states in the Gulf Coast region
have Public Assistance project
worksheets from Hurricane Katrina that
are awaiting an initial determination
from FEMA: Louisiana, Mississippi, and
Alabama. Two states in the Gulf Coast
region have Public Assistance project
worksheets from Hurricane Rita that are
awaiting an initial determination from
FEMA: Louisiana and Texas. Any
funding of these project worksheets
would be under the following major
disaster declarations: DR–1603
(Louisiana—Hurricane Katrina), DR–
1604 (Mississippi—Hurricane Katrina),
DR–1605 (Alabama—Hurricane
Katrina), DR–1606 (Texas—Hurricane
Rita), and DR–1607 (Louisiana—
Hurricane Rita). Approximately 44
appeals are pending from these
declarations. Further, there are
approximately 2,188 Public Assistance
project worksheets from Louisiana and
Mississippi awaiting an initial
determination of eligibility under the
Public Assistance program from FEMA,
which, if disputed, may be appealed.
These project worksheets are at various
stages within the determination process.
For example, some are incomplete and
awaiting further information from the
applicant, some are undergoing site
visits, and some have additional
versions requiring FEMA review.
II. Discussion of the Rule
A. General
This regulation is promulgated
pursuant to section 601 of the ARRA
and establishes arbitration procedures to
resolve outstanding disputes regarding
Public Assistance projects over
$500,000 from the states of Louisiana,
Mississippi, Alabama, and Texas under
the following declarations: DR–1603,
DR–1604, DR–1605, DR–1606, and DR–
1607. Public Assistance applicants/
subgrantees under these declarations
may request arbitration in lieu of filing
an appeal under 44 CFR 206.206 for any
determination made by FEMA that is
eligible for appeal and meets the
$500,000 threshold. As discussed
below, Public Assistance applicants/
subgrantees under these declarations
who were engaged in the FEMA appeals
process as of February 17, 2009, and had
not received a final agency decision
prior to February 17, 2009, may request
arbitration in lieu of the appeal, even if
FEMA issued a final agency decision on
the appeal on or after February 17, 2009.
B. Applicability and Limitations
The purpose of the ARRA is to
expedite recovery efforts from
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita within the
Gulf Coast region. Therefore, the option
for arbitration is limited to Public
Assistance project worksheets filed
under one of the five major disaster
declarations declared for Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita in the Gulf Coast
region. In addition, the total amount of
the Public Assistance project must be
greater than $500,000. This dollar
limitation is set by section 601 of the
ARRA and is not within FEMA’s
discretion.
Arbitration is not an option if an
agency decision became final before
February 17, 2009, the date when
arbitration became a legal option for
Public Assistance applicants under the
ARRA. For those determinations made
prior to February 17, 2009, FEMA has
determined that a final decision will
exist in three instances: (1) When the
applicant/subgrantee did not file an
appeal within the 60-day appeal period;
(2) when the applicant/subgrantee failed
to file for a second appeal within 60
days of denial of its first appeal; or (3)
when FEMA issued an appeal decision
on a second appeal of the applicant/
subgrantee. See 44 CFR 206.206. If there
was a final decision before February 17,
2009, the applicant/subgrantee has
exhausted its administrative remedies
and may not elect arbitration.
The ARRA created the right to
arbitration as of its effective date. If the
applicant/subgrantee is eligible to file
an appeal under 44 CFR 206.206, or if
a first or second level appeal was
pending on or after February 17, 2009,
arbitration remains an option.
Applicants/subgrantees that had a first
or second level appeal pending on or
after February 17, 2009, may choose
arbitration, regardless of whether FEMA
has issued a decision on the appeal
since the effective date of the ARRA.
However, if the applicant/subgrantee
was eligible to appeal after the effective
date of the ARRA, but allowed the
appeal period to expire without filing an
appeal, the applicant/subgrantee is not
eligible to file an appeal and, therefore,
is not eligible for arbitration.
The stated purpose of the ARRA
arbitration provision is to ‘‘expedite’’
recovery efforts. Accordingly, a request
for arbitration is in lieu of filing or
continuing an appeal under 44 CFR
206.206. The use of only one review
procedure, arbitration or appeal, is more
expeditious than two consecutive
review procedures. The use of both
arbitration and the standard appeal
process would lengthen, not expedite,
the recovery process. Arbitration and
appeals each require significant time to
complete, and FEMA has determined
going forward that it would be contrary
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
to Congressional intent to allow
applicants/subgrantees to pursue both
an appeal and arbitration.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
C. Content of Request for Arbitration
and Other Submissions
A request for arbitration must contain
a written statement and all
documentation supporting the
applicant’s or subgrantee’s position. The
applicant/subgrantee may provide
supporting documentation not
previously included in the project
worksheet or the application to FEMA.
There is no limit on the amount of
documentation that may be provided.
The request should include all
information necessary for the arbitration
panel to make an informed decision.
The request should clearly set out the
applicant’s/subgrantee’s position. The
parties are encouraged to describe their
claims in sufficient detail to make the
circumstances of the dispute clear to the
arbitration panel.
Any party may be represented by
counsel or another authorized
representative. If represented, the party
must provide the name and address of
the representative to the other party, the
Grantee, and the arbitration panel.
All papers, notices, or other
documents submitted to the arbitration
panel by the applicant or subgrantee,
the Grantee, or FEMA must be
simultaneously served on each party’s
authorized representative or counsel.
The submitting party must make such
service by courier or overnight delivery
service (such as Federal Express, DHL,
United Parcel Service, or the United
States Postal Service overnight
delivery), addressed to the party,
representative, or counsel, as applicable,
at its last known address.
D. Submission of the Request for
Arbitration
An applicant/subgrantee must submit
a request for arbitration simultaneously
to the Grantee, the applicable FEMA
Regional Administrator, and the
arbitration administrator. FEMA will
post an address, phone number, and fax
number for the arbitration administrator
on FEMA’s Web site at https://
www.fema.gov. Consistent with the
Section B above, any application or
project worksheet totaling more than
$500,000 that is eligible for appeal is
eligible for arbitration.
If there is a first or second level
appeal pending with FEMA, or if FEMA
issued a decision on a first or second
level appeal on or after February 17,
2009, the applicant/subgrantee must
submit the request for arbitration, as
well as a withdrawal of the pending
appeal, if applicable, simultaneously to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:16 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
the Grantee, the applicable FEMA
Regional Administrator, and the
arbitration administrator by October 30,
2009. Otherwise, if the applicant/
subgrantee seeks arbitration, it must
request arbitration in writing to the
Grantee within 30 calendar days after
receipt of notice of the determination
that is the subject of the arbitration
request, or by September 30, 2009,
whichever is later. Issues that may be
arbitrated would be the same as those
that are normally subject to appeal,
provided the total amount of the project
is greater than $500,000. As an example,
a subgrantee could appeal the amount of
the FEMA-approved costs, where the
subgrantee believes the eligible amount
should be greater. Examples of second
appeals can be found at https://
www.fema.gov/appeals/.
E. Submission by the Grantee
Within 15 calendar days of receipt of
the applicant’s or subgrantee’s request
for arbitration, the Grantee may forward
a written recommendation in support or
opposition of the applicant’s or
subgrantee’s request simultaneously to
the FEMA Regional Administrator, the
arbitration administrator, and the
applicant. In addition, the Grantee must
forward the name and address of the
Grantee’s authorized representative or
counsel.
In selecting 15 calendar days, FEMA
is implementing the intent of the ARRA.
The Act specifically requires the
arbitration process to ‘‘expedite’’
recovery efforts from Hurricanes Katrina
and Rita. A 15-calendar-day time limit
is intended to expedite the resolution of
the applicant’s or subgrantee’s dispute.
However, this 15-day time period will
allow sufficient time for the Grantee to
review the request and prepare a
recommendation without delaying the
arbitration process.
F. Submission of FEMA’s Response
Within 30 calendar days of receipt of
the applicant’s or subgrantee’s request,
FEMA will simultaneously submit a
response in support of its position, a
copy of the project worksheet(s), and
any supporting information to the
arbitration administrator, the Grantee,
and the applicant/subgrantee.
G. Selection of Arbitrators
The arbitration panels will be
composed of three judges drawn from
the Federal pool of current and senior
administrative law judges and other
similar officials serving in adjudicative
capacities on boards, commissions and
agencies. Each panel will be selected by
the arbitration administrator. The
individuals assigned to any one panel
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44763
may change from case to case, as
assigned by the arbitration
administrator. The arbitration
administrator will notify all parties to
the arbitration of the names and
identities of the arbitrators selected for
the panel.
H. Preliminary Conference
Within 10 business days of the panel’s
receipt of FEMA’s response to the
request for arbitration, a preliminary
conference will be held by telephone
with the arbitrators, the parties and/or
their representatives. The preliminary
conference may address such issues as
the future conduct of the case, including
clarification of the issues and claims,
possible arbitrator disqualification, the
scheduling of hearings and the hearing
location, if applicable, and other
administrative matters.
I. Hearing
The panel will provide the applicant/
subgrantee and FEMA with an
opportunity to make an oral
presentation in person, by telephone
conference, or other means during
which all the parties may
simultaneously hear all other
participants. If the applicant/subgrantee
or FEMA would like to request a
hearing, it must be requested no later
than the preliminary conference. The
panel will determine the hearing
location, and its decision will be final
and binding. The panel will endeavor to
hold the hearing within 60 calendar
days of the preliminary conference,
unless the panel postpones the hearing
upon agreement of the parties, or at the
request of a party for good cause shown.
If the hearing is postponed, the panel
will set a new date within 10 business
days of the postponement.
The parties may not engage in
discovery or provide additional paper
submissions at the hearing. Each party
may present its position through oral
presentations by individuals designated
in advance of the hearing. If the panel
deems it appropriate or necessary, it
may request additional written materials
from either or both parties or seek the
advice or expertise of independent
scientific or technical subject matter
experts, such as engineers and
architects.
J. Review by the Arbitration Panel
In its review, the arbitration panel
will consider all relevant written
materials provided by the parties and
the Grantee. If a hearing is held, the
panel will also consider the oral
presentations made at the hearing. In
addition, the panel may, if it deems
appropriate or necessary, seek the
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
44764
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
advice or expertise of independent
scientific or technical subject matter
experts, such as engineers or architects.
K. Decision: Time Limits
The panel will make every effort to
issue a written decision within 60
calendar days after the panel declares
the hearing closed, or if an oral
presentation was not requested, within
60 calendar days following the receipt
of FEMA’s response to the request for
arbitration. In general, 60 days is a
reasonable time for a panel to review the
determination, discuss the issues
involved, and issue a decision. It is
shorter than the 90 days allotted for first
and second level appeals under the
appeals process, and in keeping with
the purpose of the arbitration
provision—to expedite the recovery
process.
However, the issues involved in
Public Assistance determinations can be
technical and complex. In cases
involving highly technical and complex
matters, a decision of the panel may
take longer than 60 days. The appeal
regulation allows additional time for
review of an appeal when highly
technical issues are involved. See 44
CFR 206.206(d). Similarly, this
regulation provides for the possibility
that the arbitration panel will not be
able to render a decision within 60 days
on such issues.
L. Finality of Decision
A decision of the majority of the panel
will constitute a final decision, binding
on all parties. Final decisions are not
subject to further administrative review.
Final decisions are not subject to
judicial review, except as permitted by
9 U.S.C. 10.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
M. Ex Parte Communications
No party, and no one acting on behalf
of any party, will have ex parte
communications with an arbitrator. This
means that neither the applicant/
subgrantee, the Grantee, nor FEMA may
communicate with an arbitrator about a
particular arbitration without the
participation of the other parties or their
representatives. If a party engages in an
ex parte communication, the party
engaged in such communication must
provide a summary or a transcript of the
entire communication to the other
parties.
N. Costs
FEMA will pay the fees of the
arbitrators, the costs of any expert
retained by the panel and the arbitration
facility costs, if any. The expenses for
each party, including attorney’s fees,
representative fees, copying costs, costs
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:16 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
associated with attending any hearing,
and any other fees not specifically listed
in the regulation must be paid by the
party incurring the expense.
O. Guidance
FEMA will issue separate guidance as
necessary to supplement this regulation.
III. Regulatory Analysis
A. Administrative Procedure Act
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) requires an agency to publish a
rule for public comment prior to
implementation. 5 U.S.C. 553. The APA,
however, provides an exception to this
requirement for rules of agency
procedure or practice. 5 U.S.C. 553
(b)(3)(A).
This rule implements section 601 of
the ARRA by detailing how a Public
Assistance applicant or subgrantee may
request arbitration. It is therefore, a
procedural rule; it establishes
procedures for making an arbitration
request and the procedures FEMA will
follow in issuing an arbitration decision.
The rule does not affect eligibility under
the Public Assistance program; rather, it
adds an option for review of Public
Assistance applications to expedite
recovery efforts. FEMA already provides
for review of these determinations
through the appeal provisions of 44 CFR
206.206. This rule simply provides an
alternate procedure for seeking such a
review of FEMA determinations.
Further, because this rule is
procedural in nature and does not
confer any substantive rights, benefits or
obligations, FEMA finds that this rule
shall become effective immediately
upon publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
B. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866,
regulatory actions are subject to Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
review and the requirements of the
Executive Order. The Executive Order
defines ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as one that is likely to result in a rule
that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
This rule is entirely voluntary.
Applicants are not required to seek
arbitration under the authority and
requirements of this rule. This rule
provides an additional option to
applicants/subgrantees in lieu of appeal.
For those that choose to undergo
arbitration, this rule will result in a total
cost increase of $389,363 to applicants/
subgrantees, and a cost savings of
$4,242 to Grantees. This rule is not an
economically significant regulatory
action as defined in Executive Order
12866. This is not a significant rule
under Executive Order 12866; therefore,
OMB has not reviewed this rule.
Under FEMA’s standard appeal
procedures, an applicant/subgrantee
must file an appeal with documentation
supporting the appeal within 60 days of
the decision that is being appealed. The
Grantee then forwards the request to the
Regional Administrator within 60 days
of receipt, and in doing so may submit
a written recommendation to FEMA.
The Regional Administrator then
reviews the appeal and either makes a
determination or seeks additional
information from the applicant within
90 days.
If the Regional Administrator denies
the appeal, the applicant/subgrantee
may submit a second appeal to the
Grantee within 60 days of the Regional
Administrator’s denial. The Grantee
must forward the second appeal to the
Regional Administrator within 60 days
of receipt. The Regional Administrator
then forwards the second appeal to
FEMA headquarters as soon as possible.
Upon receipt, FEMA headquarters either
requests additional information,
requests independent scientific or
technical analysis from experts, or
makes a determination within 90 days.
Under the arbitration procedures
contained in this rule, an applicant/
subgrantee must submit a request for
arbitration, with documentation
supporting the request, simultaneously
to the Grantee, applicable FEMA
Regional Administrator, and the
arbitration administrator. For those that
do not have a pending appeal with
FEMA, this request is due within 30
days of receipt of notice of the
determination that is the subject of the
arbitration request. If there is an appeal
pending with FEMA, or if FEMA has
issued a decision on a first or second
level appeal on or after February 17,
2009, the request for arbitration with
supporting documentation, and if
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
applicable, a statement that they
withdraw the pending appeal, must be
sent simultaneously to the Grantee, the
applicable FEMA Regional
Administrator, and the arbitration
administrator by October 30, 2009. The
Grantee may forward a recommendation
to the Regional Administrator and the
arbitration administrator, with a copy to
the applicant, within 15 days of receipt
from the applicant/subgrantee.
Once formed, the panel will conduct
a preliminary conference by telephone,
and if requested, the parties will be
provided a hearing to make an oral
presentation in person, by telephone
conference or other means during which
all the parties may simultaneously hear
all other participants. The location will
be chosen by the panel. The panel may,
if it deems appropriate or necessary,
seek the advice or expertise of
independent scientific or technical
subject matter experts, or request
additional information from the parties.
The panel will then endeavor to issue a
written decision within 60 days after the
hearing or, if there is no hearing, after
receipt of FEMA’s response to the
request for arbitration.
As of July 17, 2009, FEMA had 2,188
project worksheets that had not yet
received an initial determination from
FEMA as well as 44 pending appeals for
disasters DR–1603, DR–1604, DR–1605,
DR–1606, and DR–1607 that are for
projects over $500,000. Adding the 44
existing appeals to the 2,188 projects
which may result in appealable
determinations creates a total of 2,232
potential projects that may be eligible
for arbitration. Not all project
worksheets will have contested
determinations that will result in
arbitration, and not all pending appeals
will be withdrawn in favor of
arbitration. To generate the cost
estimates for this rulemaking, FEMA
used existing data for first appeals.
FEMA receives an average of 364
appeals per year. Conservatively
estimating that 80 percent of those
appeals involve large projects, FEMA
estimates that 291 appeals are
associated with the total 5,008 large
projects obligated by FEMA per year. As
a result, FEMA estimates that 5.81
percent of large projects are appealed
(5.81% = 291/5,008). By applying this
percentage, FEMA estimates that 127
appeals are expected from the 2,188
large projects over $500,000 that have
not yet received an initial determination
from FEMA for disasters DR–1693, DR–
1604, DR–1605, DR–1606, and DR–1607
(5.81% × 2,188 = 127).
The arbitration process requires the
applicant/subgrantee to submit a request
for arbitration simultaneously to the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:16 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Grantee, the applicable FEMA Regional
Administrator, and the arbitration
administrator in the form of a written
statement from the applicant/
subgrantee, which FEMA conservatively
estimates will take an applicant/
subgrantee approximately one hour to
complete.2 Within 15 days of receipt of
the request for arbitration, the Grantee
may forward a recommendation to
FEMA and the arbitration administrator
(with a copy to the applicant/
subgrantee), which FEMA estimates will
take the Grantee approximately one
hour to complete. FEMA therefore
estimates that it will take 127
applicants/subgrantees a cumulative
127 hours to prepare requests for
arbitration and the four potential
Grantees (the States of LA, MS, TX, and
AL) a cumulative 127 hours to prepare
and forward their recommendation to
FEMA and the arbitration administrator.
FEMA obtained the national average
hourly wage for a managerial ($36.50)
position in State government from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2009) ‘‘May
2007 National Industry-specific
Occupational Employment and Wage
Estimates’’, NAICS 999200—State
Government (OES Designation). The
managerial wage rate was for the
‘‘General and Operations Managers
position (standard occupational
classification (SOC) code #: 11–1021).’’
The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ hourly
wage reflects only the direct cost of
employment. FEMA, therefore,
multiplied the wage rates by 1.4 to
derive the full employment costs for a
managerial ($51.10) position in State
government. FEMA estimates that it will
take applicants/subgrantees and
Grantees the same amount of time to
prepare requests for arbitration as it
takes them to prepare requests for
appeal. Therefore, FEMA estimates that
this rulemaking will result in a cost
savings of $6,490 (= 127 × 51.10) for
applicants/subgrantees and $6,490 (=
127 × 51.10) for Grantees. These cost
savings occur because there is no
requirement for an applicant/subgrantee
to resubmit documentation through a
second round of review to exhaust its
administrative remedies under
arbitration, as there is in the appeals
process. This method is intended to
reduce the administrative burden on
2 This figure was generated using similar
estimates from other Federal agencies requests for
arbitration. For example, National Mediation Board
receives about 80 ‘‘Requests for Arbitration Panel
for Airline System Boards of Adjustment’’ annually
with a burden estimate of 20 hours per year (74 FR
10098); or Federal Mediation and Conciliation
Service’s ‘‘Request for Arbitration Services’’ form,
receiving approximately 10,000 per year and
estimating about 10 minutes to complete (71 FR
69130).
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44765
applicants/subgrantees. Applicant/
subgrantees may only seek one method
for resolution of the dispute—appeal or
arbitration—not both.
In addition to the 2,188 project
worksheets which have not yet received
an initial determination from FEMA, as
noted above, as of July 17, 2009, FEMA
currently has 44 pending appeals.
Although it is not expected that all of
these appeals will be withdrawn in
favor of arbitration, as a conservative
estimate for the purposes of this
analysis, FEMA estimates that all 44
will withdraw in favor of arbitration.
Therefore these applicants/subgrantees
will also submit a request for arbitration
containing a statement that they
withdraw their appeal. FEMA estimates
it will take the applicant/subgrantee
approximately one hour to prepare its
request and the Grantee one hour to
prepare its recommendation and
forward it to FEMA and the arbitration
administrator. Using the $51.10 wage
rate established above, FEMA estimates
that this change will have a total cost of
$2,248 (= 44 × $51.10) to applicants/
subgrantees and $2,248 (= 44 × $51.10)
to Grantees.
The panel will conduct a preliminary
conference by telephone, and if
requested, the parties will make an oral
presentation in person, by telephone
conference or other means during which
all the parties may simultaneously hear
all other participants at a location
designated by the panel. In person
appearance at a hearing is entirely
voluntary, at the applicant’s/
subgrantee’s discretion. If they choose to
appear, however, the costs to do so are
incurred by the applicant/subgrantee.
Because the hearings may be conducted
via telephone or other means during
which all the parties may
simultaneously hear all other
participants, most applicants are not
expected to have any travel costs. For
those who are granted an in-person
hearing, the panel may choose to have
the hearing in Washington, DC. It is also
likely that more than one person will
attend. This is based on FEMA’s
experience meeting with applicants on
second appeals, which usually involves
about six people. This includes
representatives from the applicant, the
State, and any consultants. Assuming
round trip air travel for a team of six
people and that 25 percent of the
applicants/subgrantees will make an inperson appearance, (43 = 25% × (127 +
44)), FEMA estimates that the travel cost
to applicants/subgrantees will be
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
44766
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
$89,526 (= 43 × 6 × $347 3)). In addition,
should an applicant/subgrantee choose
to appear in person, it will incur (1)
lodging, meals, and incidental expenses,
and (2) the regular-time cost of the
employee who attends the hearing in
lieu of performing that employee’s
regular duties. Assuming that
attendance at a hearing will require two
work days to travel to and attend the
hearing, lodging, meals, and incidental
expenses will be $93,138 (= 43 × 6
people × $361 4). The time cost to
applicants/subgrantees will be $210,941
(= 43 × 6 people × 16 hours × $51.10).
Therefore, the total cost to applicants/
subgrantees for in-person presentation
at a hearing is estimated to be $393,605
(= $89,526 + $93,138 + $210,941).
FEMA will pay the fees of the
arbitrators, the costs of any expert
retained by the panel, and the
arbitration facility costs, if any. Even
though FEMA cannot quantify this cost
change, it is not likely to be
economically significant given the
number of arbitrations expected from
disasters DR–1603, DR–1604, DR–1605,
DR–1606, and DR–1607. Additionally, it
will save the Federal government the
time and costs it would have incurred
to process appeals. FEMA estimates that
this rule will result in a cost increase of
$389,363 to applicants/subgrantees, and
a cost saving of $4,242 to Grantees.
Table 1 details the impact of the final
rule. FEMA did not annualize the
impact because this rule applies only to
disasters DR–1603, DR–1604, DR–1605,
DR–1606, and DR–1607. FEMA has
determined that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact of $100
million or more per year.
TABLE 1—QUANTIFIED IMPACT OF THE FINAL RULE
Applicants/
Subgrantees
Grantees
Requests for arbitration ...........................................................................................................................................
Requests forwarded for arbitration ..........................................................................................................................
Withdraw in favor of arbitration ...............................................................................................................................
In-person presentation .............................................................................................................................................
¥$6,490
2,248
393,605
¥$6,490
2,248
........................
Sub-total ...........................................................................................................................................................
389,363
¥4,242
Grand Total ...............................................................................................................................................
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), and section 213(a) of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
Public Law 104–121, 110 Stat. 847, 858–
9 (Mar. 29, 1996) (5 U.S.C. 601 note)
require that special consideration be
given to the effects of proposed
regulations on small entities. The RFA
mandates that an agency conduct a RFA
analysis when an agency is ‘‘required by
section 553 * * * to publish general
notice of proposed rulemaking for any
proposed rule.’’ 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
Accordingly, an RFA is not required
when a rule is exempt from notice and
comment rulemaking under 5 U.S.C.
553(b). FEMA has determined that this
rule is exempt from notice and comment
rulemaking because it is a rule of agency
procedure. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A).
Therefore, an RFA analysis under 5
U.S.C. 603 is not required for this rule.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
D. National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
assistance provided under sections 403,
406, and 407 of the Stafford Act are
statutorily excluded from NEPA and the
preparation of environmental impact
statements and environmental
assessments by section 316 of the
Stafford Act. 42 U.S.C. 5159; 44 CFR
10.8(c). NEPA implementing regulations
governing FEMA activities at 44 CFR
10.8(d)(2)(ii) categorically exclude the
preparation, revision, and adoption of
regulations from the preparation of an
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement, where
the rule relates to actions that qualify for
categorical exclusions. Action taken or
assistance provided under sections 403
and 407 of the Stafford Act are
categorically excluded under 44 CFR
10.8(d)(2)(xix). Because no other
extraordinary circumstances have been
identified, this rule does not require the
preparation of either an environmental
assessment or an environmental impact
statement as defined by NEPA.
This rulemaking is categorically
excluded from further review under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), Public Law 91–190, 83 Stat.
852 (Jan. 1, 1970) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), as amended. Action taken or
E. Executive Order 12898,
Environmental Justice
Under Executive Order 12898, Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994, FEMA incorporates
environmental justice into its policies
3 Average domestic airfare in the 4th quarter of
2008 from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), May 6,
2009, https://www.bts.gov/press_releases/2009/
bts021_09/html/bts021_09.html.
4 The amount of $361 includes hotel expense for
one night, and meals and incidental expenses for
two days. The per diem rate for the District of
Columbia is obtained from the U.S. General
Services Administration, May 2009, https://
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:16 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
385,121
and programs. The Executive Order
requires each Federal agency to conduct
its programs, policies, and activities that
substantially affect human health or the
environment, in a manner that ensures
that those programs, policies, and
activities do not have the effect of
excluding persons from participation in
our programs, denying persons the
benefits of our programs, or subjecting
persons to discrimination because of
their race, color, or national origin.
No action that FEMA can anticipate
under this rule will have a
disproportionately high or adverse
human health and environmental effect
on any segment of the population.
Accordingly, the requirements of
Executive Order 12898 do not apply to
this rule.
F. Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking
FEMA has sent this final rule to the
Congress and to the Government
Accountability Office under the
Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking Act, (‘‘Congressional
Review Act’’), Public Law 104–121, 110
Stat. 873 (Mar. 29, 1996) (5 U.S.C. 804).
This rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ within
the meaning of the Congressional
Review Act.
www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/
contentView.do?queryYear=2009&
contentType=GSA_BASIC&contentId=17943&
queryState=District+of+Columbia&noc=T.
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 48
(Mar. 22, 1995) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.),
applies to any notice of proposed
rulemaking that would implement any
rule which includes a Federal mandate
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year.
If the rulemaking includes a Federal
mandate, the Act requires an agency to
prepare an assessment of the anticipated
costs and benefits of the Federal
mandate. The Act also pertains to any
regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Before establishing any
such requirements, an agency must
develop a plan allowing for input from
the affected governments regarding the
requirements. FEMA has determined
that this rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, nor by
the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year as a result of a
Federal mandate, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. In light of the foregoing,
FEMA has determined that no actions
are deemed necessary under the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
H. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132, Federalism,
64 FR 43255, August 4, 1999, sets forth
principles and criteria that agencies
must adhere to in formulating and
implementing policies that have
federalism implications, that is,
regulations that have substantial direct
effects on the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Federal agencies
must closely examine the statutory
authority supporting any action that
would limit the policymaking discretion
of the States, and to the extent
practicable, must consult with State and
local officials before implementing any
such action. This final rule involves no
policies that have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
I. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rule contains a collection of
information that is subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA), as amended, Public
Law 104–13, 109 Stat. 163, (May 22,
1995) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:16 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
information collection included in this
rule is approved by OMB under control
number 1660–0017, Public Assistance
Progress Report and Program Forms.
J. Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, 65 FR 67249, Nov. 9,
2000, applies to agency regulations that
have Tribal implications, that is,
regulations that have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. Under
this Executive Order, to the extent
practicable and permitted by law, no
agency may promulgate any regulation
that has Tribal implications, that
imposes substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian Tribal governments, and
that is not required by statute, unless
funds necessary to pay the direct costs
incurred by the Indian Tribal
government or the Tribe in complying
with the regulation are provided by the
Federal Government, or the agency
consults with Tribal officials.
There is no substantial direct
compliance cost associated with this
rule. This rule would not affect the
distribution of power or responsibilities
of Tribal governments.
K. Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
With Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
FEMA has reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12630, ‘‘Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights’’ (53 FR 8859, Mar. 18, 1988) as
supplemented by Executive Order
13406, ‘‘Protecting the Property Rights
of the American People’’ (71 FR 36973,
June 28, 2006). This rule will not affect
the taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications
under Executive Order 12630.
L. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
FEMA has reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform’’ (61 FR 4729, Feb. 7, 1996).
This rule meets applicable standards to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 206
Administrative practice and
procedure, Coastal zone, Community
facilities, Disaster assistance, Fire
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44767
prevention, Grant programs-housing and
community development, Housing,
Insurance, Intergovernmental relations,
Loan programs—housing and
community development, Natural
resources, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency amends 44 CFR
part 206, subpart G, as follows:
PART 206—FEDERAL DISASTER
ASSISTANCE
1. The authority citation for part 206
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42
U.S.C. 5121 through 5207; Reorganization
Plan No. 3 of 1978, 43 FR 41943, 3 CFR, 1978
Comp., p. 329; Homeland Security Act of
2002, 6 U.S.C. 101; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376; E.O. 12148, 44
FR 43239, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 412; and
E.O. 13286, 68 FR 10619, 3 CFR, 2003 Comp.,
p. 166.
■
2. Add § 206.209 to read as follows:
§ 206.209 Arbitration for Public Assistance
determinations related to Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita (Major disaster
declarations DR–1603, DR–1604, DR–1605,
DR–1606, and DR–1607).
(a) Scope. Pursuant to section 601 of
the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, Public Law
111–5, this section establishes
procedures for arbitration to resolve
disputed Public Assistance applications
under the following major disaster
declarations: DR–1603, DR–1604, DR–
1605, DR–1606, and DR–1607.
(b) Applicability. An applicant or
subgrantee (hereinafter ‘‘applicant’’ for
purposes of this section) may request
arbitration of a determination made by
FEMA on an application for Public
Assistance, provided that the total
amount of the project is greater than
$500,000, and provided that:
(1) the applicant is eligible to file an
appeal under § 206.206; or
(2) the applicant had a first or second
level appeal pending with FEMA
pursuant to § 206.206 on or after
February 17, 2009.
(c) Governing rules. An applicant that
elects arbitration agrees to abide by this
section and applicable guidance. The
arbitration will be conducted pursuant
to procedure established by the
arbitration panel.
(d) Limitations—(1) Election of
remedies. A request for arbitration
under this section is in lieu of filing or
continuing an appeal under § 206.206.
(2) Final agency action under
§ 206.206. Arbitration is not available
for any matter that obtained final agency
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
44768
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
action by FEMA pursuant to § 206.206
prior to February 17, 2009. Arbitration
is not available for determinations for
which the applicant failed to file a
timely appeal under the provisions of
§ 206.206 prior to August 31, 2009, or
for determinations which received a
decision on a second appeal from FEMA
prior to February 17, 2009.
(e) Request for arbitration—(1)
Content of request. The request for
arbitration must contain a written
statement and all documentation
supporting the position of the applicant,
the disaster number, and the name and
address of the applicant’s authorized
representative or counsel.
(2) Submission by the applicant to the
Grantee, the FEMA Regional
Administrator, and the arbitration
administrator. An applicant under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section must
submit its request for arbitration in
writing simultaneously to the Grantee,
the FEMA Regional Administrator, and
the arbitration administrator within 30
calendar days after receipt of notice of
the determination that is the subject of
the arbitration request or by September
30, 2009, whichever is later. An
applicant under paragraph (b)(2) of this
section must make a request for
arbitration in writing and, if FEMA has
not issued a decision on the appeal,
submit a withdrawal of the pending
appeal, simultaneously to the Grantee,
the FEMA Regional Administrator, and
the arbitration administrator by October
30, 2009.
(3) Submission by the Grantee to the
arbitration administrator and FEMA.
Within 15 calendar days of receipt of
the applicant’s request for arbitration,
the Grantee must forward the name and
address of the Grantee’s authorized
representative or counsel, and may
forward a written recommendation in
support or opposition to the applicant’s
request for arbitration, simultaneously
to the FEMA Regional Administrator,
the arbitration administrator, and the
applicant.
(4) Submission of FEMA’s response.
FEMA will submit a memorandum in
support of its position, a copy of the
Project Worksheet(s), and any other
supporting information, as well as the
name and address of its authorized
representative or counsel,
simultaneously to the arbitration
administrator, the Grantee, and the
applicant, within 30 calendar days of
receipt of the applicant’s request for
arbitration.
(5) Process for submissions. When
submitting a request for arbitration, the
applicant should describe its claim with
sufficient detail so that the
circumstances of the dispute are clear to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:16 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
the arbitration panel. All papers,
notices, or other documents submitted
to the arbitration administrator under
this section by the applicant, the
Grantee, or FEMA will be served on
each party’s authorized representative
or counsel. The submitting party will
make such service by courier or
overnight delivery service (such as
Federal Express, DHL, United Parcel
Service, or the United States Postal
Service overnight delivery), addressed
to the party, representative, or counsel,
as applicable, at its last known address.
(f) Selection of arbitration panel. The
arbitration administrator will select the
arbitration panel for arbitration and
notify the applicant, FEMA, and the
Grantee of the names and identities of
the arbitrators selected for the panel.
(g) Preliminary conference. The
arbitration panel will hold a preliminary
conference with the parties and/or
representatives of the parties within 10
business days of the panel’s receipt of
FEMA’s response to the request for
arbitration. The panel and the parties
will discuss the future conduct of the
arbitration, including clarification of the
disputed issues, request for
disqualification of an arbitrator (if
applicable), and any other preliminary
matters. The date and place of any oral
hearing will be set at the preliminary
conference. The preliminary conference
will be conducted by telephone.
(h) Hearing—(1) Request for hearing.
The panel will provide the applicant
and FEMA with an opportunity to make
an oral presentation on the substance of
the applicant’s claim in person, by
telephone conference, or other means
during which all the parties may
simultaneously hear all other
participants. If the applicant or FEMA
would like to request an oral hearing,
the request must be made no later than
the preliminary conference.
(2) Location of hearing. If an in-person
hearing is authorized, it will be held at
a hearing facility of the arbitration
panel’s choosing.
(3) Conduct of hearing. Each party
may present its position through oral
presentations by individuals designated
in advance of the hearing. These
presentations may reference documents
submitted pursuant to paragraph (e) of
this section; the parties may not provide
additional paper submissions at the
hearing. If the panel deems it
appropriate or necessary, it may request
additional written materials from either
or both parties or seek the advice or
expertise of independent scientific or
technical subject matter experts.
(4) Closing of hearing. The panel will
inquire of each party whether it has any
further argument. When satisfied that
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the record is complete, the panel will
declare the hearing closed, unless a
post-hearing submission of additional
information or a memorandum of law is
to be provided in accordance with this
paragraph. The hearing will be declared
closed as of the date set by the panel for
the submission of the additional
information or the memorandum of law.
(5) Time limits. The panel will
endeavor to hold the hearing within 60
calendar days of the preliminary
conference.
(6) Postponement. The arbitration
panel may postpone a hearing upon
agreement of the parties, or upon
request of a party for good cause shown.
Within 10 business days of the
postponement, the arbitration panel will
notify the parties of the rescheduled
date of the hearing.
(7) Record of the hearing. There will
be no recording of the hearing, unless a
party specifically requests and arranges
for such recording at its own expense.
(8) Post-hearing submission of
additional information. A party may file
with the arbitration panel additional
information or a memorandum of law
after the hearing upon the arbitration
panel’s request or upon the request of
one of the parties with the panel’s
consent. The panel will set the time for
submission of the additional
information or the memorandum of law.
(9) Reopening of hearing. The hearing
may be reopened on the panel’s
initiative under compelling
circumstances at any time before the
decision is made.
(i) Review by the arbitration panel. (1)
Determination of timeliness. Upon
notification by FEMA, or on its own
initiative, the arbitration panel will
determine whether the applicant timely
filed a request for arbitration.
(2) Substantive review. The arbitration
panel will consider all relevant written
materials provided by the applicant, the
Grantee, and FEMA, as well as oral
presentations, if any. If the panel deems
it appropriate or necessary, it may
request additional written materials
from either or both parties or seek the
advice or expertise of independent
scientific or technical subject matter
experts.
(j) Ex parte communications. No party
and no one acting on behalf of any party
will engage in ex parte communications
with a member of the arbitration panel.
If a party or someone acting on behalf
of any party engages in ex parte
communications with a member of the
arbitration panel, the party that engaged
in such communication will provide a
summary or a transcript of the entire
communication to the other parties.
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(k) Decision—(1) Time limits. The
panel will make every effort to issue a
written decision within 60 calendar
days after the panel declares the hearing
closed pursuant to paragraph (h)(4) of
this section, or, if a hearing was not
requested, within 60 calendar days
following the receipt of FEMA’s
response to the request for arbitration. A
decision of the panel may take longer
than 60 calendar days if the arbitration
involves a highly technical or complex
matter.
(2) Form and content. The decision of
the panel will be in writing and signed
by each member of the panel. The panel
will issue a reasoned decision that
includes a brief and informal discussion
of the factual and legal basis for the
decision.
(3) Finality of decision. A decision of
the majority of the panel shall constitute
a final decision, binding on all parties.
Final decisions are not subject to further
administrative review. Final decisions
are not subject to judicial review, except
as permitted by 9 U.S.C. 10.
(4) Delivery of decision. Notice and
delivery of the decision will be by
facsimile or other electronic means and
by regular mail to each party or its
authorized representative or counsel.
(l) Costs. FEMA will pay the fees
associated with the arbitration panel,
the costs of any expert retained by the
panel, and the arbitration facility costs,
if any. The expenses for each party,
including attorney’s fees, representative
fees, copying costs, costs associated
with attending any hearing, or any other
fees not listed in this paragraph will be
paid by the party incurring such costs.
(m) Guidance. FEMA may issue
separate guidance as necessary to
supplement this section.
Dated: August 14, 2009.
Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9–19994 Filed 8–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
48 CFR 202, 209, 214, et al.
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulations Supplement; Technical
Amendments
Correction
In rule document E9–20416 beginning
on page 42779 in the issue of Tuesday,
August 25, 2009, make the following
correction:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:16 Aug 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
On page 42780 starting in the first
column, the definition for Contracting
activity in section 202.101 is corrected
to read as follows:
202.101
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Contracting activity for DoD also
means elements designated by the
director of a defense agency which has
been delegated contracting authority
through its agency charter. DoD
contracting activities are—
Department of Defense
Counterintelligence Field Activity
Department of Defense Education Activity
TRICARE Management Activity
Washington Headquarters Services,
Acquisition and Procurement Office
44769
Air Force Materiel Command
Air Force Reserve Command
Air Combat Command
Air Mobility Command
Air Education and Training Command
Pacific Air Forces
United States Air Forces in Europe
Air Force Space Command
Air Force District of Washington
Air Force Operational Test & Evaluation
Center
Air Force Special Operations Command
United States Air Force Academy
Aeronautical Systems Center
Air Armament Center
Electronic Systems Center
Space and Missile Systems Center
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Office of the Deputy Director, Management
Army
Headquarters, U.S. Army Contracting
Command
Joint Contracting Command—Iraq/
Afghanistan
National Guard Bureau
Program Executive Office for Simulation,
Training, and Instrumentation
U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Life Cycle
Management Command
U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Life
Cycle Management Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Expeditionary Contracting
Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security
Command
U.S. Army Joint Munitions and Lethality Life
Cycle Management Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel
Command
U.S. Army Mission and Installation
Contracting Command
U.S. Army Research, Development, and
Engineering Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense
Command
U.S. Army Sustainment Command
U.S. Army Tank-Automotive and Armaments
Life Cycle Management Command
Defense Business Transformation Agency
Navy
Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of
the Navy (Acquisition & Logistics
Management)
Naval Air Systems Command
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
Naval Inventory Control Point
Naval Sea Systems Command
Naval Supply Systems Command
Office of Naval Research
Military Sealift Command
Strategic Systems Programs
Marine Corps Systems Command
Installations and Logistics, Headquarters,
U.S. Marine Corps
Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Air Force
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air
Force (Acquisition)
Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Contracting)
Directorate of Acquisition
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Contracting Office
Defense Commissary Agency
Directorate of Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency
Office of the Director, Defense Contract
Management Agency
Defense Finance And Accounting Service
External Services, Defense Finance and
Accounting Service
Defense Information Systems Agency
Defense Information Technology Contracting
Organization
Defense Intelligence Agency
Office of Procurement
Defense Logistics Agency
Acquisition Management Directorate
Defense Supply Centers
Defense Energy Support Center
Defense Security Cooperation Agency
Contracting Division
Defense Security Service
Acquisition and Contracting Branch
Acquisition Management Office
Missile Defense Agency
Headquarters, Missile Defense Agency
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
Procurement and Contracting Office
National Security Agency
Headquarters, National Security Agency
United States Special Operations Command
Headquarters, United States Special
Operations Command
United States Transportation Command
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. Z9–20416 Filed 8–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 167 (Monday, August 31, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44761-44769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19994]
[[Page 44761]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
44 CFR Part 206
[Docket ID FEMA-2009-0006]
RIN 1660-AA63
Arbitration for Public Assistance Determinations Related to
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (Disasters DR-1603, DR-1604, DR-1605, DR-
1606, and DR-1607)
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(ARRA), this final rule establishes an option for arbitration under the
Public Assistance program administered by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency. Public Assistance grant award determinations related
to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita under major disaster declarations DR-
1603, DR-1604, DR-1605, DR-1606, and DR-1607 are eligible for
arbitration, within the limits set by this rule.
DATES: Effective Date: August 31, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tod Wells, Deputy Director, Public
Assistance Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street,
SW., Washington DC, 20472-3100, (phone) 202-646-3936, or (e-mail)
tod.wells@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Public Assistance Process for Project Approval
Under the Public Assistance program, authorized by the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act \1\ (Stafford
Act), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) awards grants to
State and local governments, Indian Tribal governments, and certain
private nonprofit organizations (``eligible applicant''--44 CFR
206.222) to assist them to respond to and recover from Presidentially-
declared emergencies and major disasters as quickly as possible.
Specifically, the program provides assistance for debris removal,
emergency protective measures, and permanent restoration of
infrastructure. When the President declares an emergency or major
disaster declaration for a State, authorizing the Public Assistance
program, an eligible applicant may apply for Public Assistance. The
applicant submits a Request for Public Assistance (FEMA Form 90-49) to
FEMA through the Grantee, which is usually the State, but may be an
Indian Tribal government. An eligible applicant may be a State agency,
a local or Tribal government, or a private nonprofit organization. See
44 CFR 206.222. Upon award, the Grantee notifies the applicant of the
award, and the applicant becomes a subgrantee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Disaster Relief Act of 1974, Public Law 93-288, 88 Stat. 143
(May 22, 1974), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The basis for the Public Assistance grant is a project worksheet.
The project worksheet documents the details of the project, which is a
logical grouping of work required as a result of a declared major
disaster or emergency. A project may include eligible work at several
sites, and may include more than one project worksheet. A project
worksheet is the primary form used to document the location, damage
description and dimensions, scope of work, and cost estimate for each
project. The Office of Management and Budget has approved the project
worksheet form (FEMA Form 90-91) under information collection number
1660-0017. When the scope of work or estimated costs of a project
change, FEMA generates an additional version of the project worksheet.
It is not uncommon to have several versions of a project worksheet for
one project, as it may be difficult to predict costs and scope of work
at the beginning of a project.
FEMA divides applications for Public Assistance into two groups--
large projects and small projects--based on the dollar amount of the
project. The threshold for large and small projects is adjusted
annually to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor. The
threshold for small projects in Fiscal Year 2005 (Hurricanes Katrina
and Rita occurred in Fiscal Year 2005) was $55,500. The project
worksheet process is slightly different for these two types of
projects. Since the arbitration process applies only to large projects
totaling more than $500,000, this rulemaking will address the process
for reviewing project worksheets for large projects.
Project worksheets for large projects are developed by a FEMA
Project Specialist, working with the applicant/subgrantee, and are
submitted directly to a FEMA Public Assistance Coordinator (PAC) Crew
Leader for review and processing. Although large projects are funded on
documented actual costs, work typically is not complete at the time of
project approval. Therefore, FEMA obligates large project grants based
on estimated costs. The obligation process is the process by which
funds are made available to the Grantee. The funds reside in a Federal
account until drawn down by the Grantee and paid to the applicant/
subgrantee. When the applicant/subgrantee or Grantee disagree with
FEMA's determination about whether a cost is eligible for reimbursement
or reasonable, among other project worksheet determinations, FEMA
provides an appeals process to adjudicate such disputes.
B. Public Assistance Appeal Process Under 44 CFR 206.206
Traditionally, under the appeals procedures in 44 CFR 206.206, an
eligible applicant, subgrantee, or Grantee may appeal any determination
made by FEMA related to an application for or the provision of Public
Assistance. There are two levels of appeal. The first level appeal is
to the FEMA Regional Administrator. The second level appeal is to the
FEMA Assistant Administrator for the Disaster Assistance Directorate.
Typical appeals involve disputes regarding whether an applicant,
facility, item of work, or project is eligible for Public Assistance,
whether approved costs are sufficient to complete the work, whether a
requested time extension was properly denied, whether a portion of the
cost claimed for the work is eligible, or whether the approved scope of
work is correct.
An applicant/subgrantee appellant must file an appeal with the
Grantee within 60 days of the appellant's receipt of a notice of the
determination that is being appealed. The appellant must provide
documented justification to support the position of the appellant. This
documentation should specify the monetary amount in dispute and the
provisions in Federal law, regulation, or policy with which the
appellant believes the initial action was inconsistent. The Grantee
reviews and evaluates the appeal documentation. The Grantee then
prepares a written recommendation on the merits of the appeal and
forwards that recommendation to the FEMA Regional Administrator within
60 days of its receipt of the appeal. The Grantee need not endorse the
appeal position but must forward all appeals it receives.
The Regional Administrator reviews the appeal and takes one of two
actions: (1) Renders a decision on the appeal and informs the Grantee
of the decision; or (2) requests additional information. The appellant
may be granted 60 days to provide any additional information, and the
Regional Administrator provides a
[[Page 44762]]
decision on the appeal within 90 days of receipt of that information.
If the appeal is granted, the Regional Administrator takes appropriate
action, such as approving additional funding, denying additional
funding, or sending a Project Specialist to meet with the appellant to
determine additional eligible funding.
If the Regional Administrator denies the appeal, the appellant may
submit a second appeal. The appellant must submit the second appeal to
the Grantee within 60 days of receiving notice of the Regional
Administrator's decision. The Grantee must forward the second level
appeal with a written recommendation to the Regional Administrator
within 60 days of receiving the second appeal. The Regional
Administrator reviews the information provided with the second appeal
and requests additional information if necessary. The Regional
Administrator forwards the second appeal with a recommendation for
action to the FEMA Assistant Administrator as soon as practicable.
The FEMA Assistant Administrator for the Disaster Assistance
Directorate reviews the second appeal and renders a decision or
requests additional information from the appellant. In a case involving
highly technical issues, FEMA may request an independent scientific or
technical analysis by a group or person having expertise in the subject
matter of the appeal. Upon receipt of requested information from the
appellant and any other requested reports, FEMA renders a decision on
the second appeal within 90 days. This decision constitutes the final
administrative decision of FEMA. See 44 CFR 206.206(e)(3).
C. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
The President signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 (ARRA or Act), Public Law 111-5, into law on February 17, 2009.
Section 601 of the ARRA requires the President to establish an
arbitration panel under FEMA's Public Assistance program to expedite
recovery efforts from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita within the Gulf Coast
region. The ARRA further requires the arbitration panel to have
sufficient authority regarding the award or denial of disputed Public
Assistance applications for covered hurricane damage under sections
403, 406, or 407 of the Stafford Act. The ARRA limits arbitration to
projects that total more than $500,000. By memorandum dated August 6,
2009, the President assigned to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security the function of the President under section 601. See
74 FR 40055 (Aug. 10, 2009).
Three states in the Gulf Coast region have Public Assistance
project worksheets from Hurricane Katrina that are awaiting an initial
determination from FEMA: Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. Two
states in the Gulf Coast region have Public Assistance project
worksheets from Hurricane Rita that are awaiting an initial
determination from FEMA: Louisiana and Texas. Any funding of these
project worksheets would be under the following major disaster
declarations: DR-1603 (Louisiana--Hurricane Katrina), DR-1604
(Mississippi--Hurricane Katrina), DR-1605 (Alabama--Hurricane Katrina),
DR-1606 (Texas--Hurricane Rita), and DR-1607 (Louisiana--Hurricane
Rita). Approximately 44 appeals are pending from these declarations.
Further, there are approximately 2,188 Public Assistance project
worksheets from Louisiana and Mississippi awaiting an initial
determination of eligibility under the Public Assistance program from
FEMA, which, if disputed, may be appealed. These project worksheets are
at various stages within the determination process. For example, some
are incomplete and awaiting further information from the applicant,
some are undergoing site visits, and some have additional versions
requiring FEMA review.
II. Discussion of the Rule
A. General
This regulation is promulgated pursuant to section 601 of the ARRA
and establishes arbitration procedures to resolve outstanding disputes
regarding Public Assistance projects over $500,000 from the states of
Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Texas under the following
declarations: DR-1603, DR-1604, DR-1605, DR-1606, and DR-1607. Public
Assistance applicants/subgrantees under these declarations may request
arbitration in lieu of filing an appeal under 44 CFR 206.206 for any
determination made by FEMA that is eligible for appeal and meets the
$500,000 threshold. As discussed below, Public Assistance applicants/
subgrantees under these declarations who were engaged in the FEMA
appeals process as of February 17, 2009, and had not received a final
agency decision prior to February 17, 2009, may request arbitration in
lieu of the appeal, even if FEMA issued a final agency decision on the
appeal on or after February 17, 2009.
B. Applicability and Limitations
The purpose of the ARRA is to expedite recovery efforts from
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita within the Gulf Coast region. Therefore,
the option for arbitration is limited to Public Assistance project
worksheets filed under one of the five major disaster declarations
declared for Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in the Gulf Coast region. In
addition, the total amount of the Public Assistance project must be
greater than $500,000. This dollar limitation is set by section 601 of
the ARRA and is not within FEMA's discretion.
Arbitration is not an option if an agency decision became final
before February 17, 2009, the date when arbitration became a legal
option for Public Assistance applicants under the ARRA. For those
determinations made prior to February 17, 2009, FEMA has determined
that a final decision will exist in three instances: (1) When the
applicant/subgrantee did not file an appeal within the 60-day appeal
period; (2) when the applicant/subgrantee failed to file for a second
appeal within 60 days of denial of its first appeal; or (3) when FEMA
issued an appeal decision on a second appeal of the applicant/
subgrantee. See 44 CFR 206.206. If there was a final decision before
February 17, 2009, the applicant/subgrantee has exhausted its
administrative remedies and may not elect arbitration.
The ARRA created the right to arbitration as of its effective date.
If the applicant/subgrantee is eligible to file an appeal under 44 CFR
206.206, or if a first or second level appeal was pending on or after
February 17, 2009, arbitration remains an option. Applicants/
subgrantees that had a first or second level appeal pending on or after
February 17, 2009, may choose arbitration, regardless of whether FEMA
has issued a decision on the appeal since the effective date of the
ARRA. However, if the applicant/subgrantee was eligible to appeal after
the effective date of the ARRA, but allowed the appeal period to expire
without filing an appeal, the applicant/subgrantee is not eligible to
file an appeal and, therefore, is not eligible for arbitration.
The stated purpose of the ARRA arbitration provision is to
``expedite'' recovery efforts. Accordingly, a request for arbitration
is in lieu of filing or continuing an appeal under 44 CFR 206.206. The
use of only one review procedure, arbitration or appeal, is more
expeditious than two consecutive review procedures. The use of both
arbitration and the standard appeal process would lengthen, not
expedite, the recovery process. Arbitration and appeals each require
significant time to complete, and FEMA has determined going forward
that it would be contrary
[[Page 44763]]
to Congressional intent to allow applicants/subgrantees to pursue both
an appeal and arbitration.
C. Content of Request for Arbitration and Other Submissions
A request for arbitration must contain a written statement and all
documentation supporting the applicant's or subgrantee's position. The
applicant/subgrantee may provide supporting documentation not
previously included in the project worksheet or the application to
FEMA. There is no limit on the amount of documentation that may be
provided. The request should include all information necessary for the
arbitration panel to make an informed decision. The request should
clearly set out the applicant's/subgrantee's position. The parties are
encouraged to describe their claims in sufficient detail to make the
circumstances of the dispute clear to the arbitration panel.
Any party may be represented by counsel or another authorized
representative. If represented, the party must provide the name and
address of the representative to the other party, the Grantee, and the
arbitration panel.
All papers, notices, or other documents submitted to the
arbitration panel by the applicant or subgrantee, the Grantee, or FEMA
must be simultaneously served on each party's authorized representative
or counsel. The submitting party must make such service by courier or
overnight delivery service (such as Federal Express, DHL, United Parcel
Service, or the United States Postal Service overnight delivery),
addressed to the party, representative, or counsel, as applicable, at
its last known address.
D. Submission of the Request for Arbitration
An applicant/subgrantee must submit a request for arbitration
simultaneously to the Grantee, the applicable FEMA Regional
Administrator, and the arbitration administrator. FEMA will post an
address, phone number, and fax number for the arbitration administrator
on FEMA's Web site at https://www.fema.gov. Consistent with the Section
B above, any application or project worksheet totaling more than
$500,000 that is eligible for appeal is eligible for arbitration.
If there is a first or second level appeal pending with FEMA, or if
FEMA issued a decision on a first or second level appeal on or after
February 17, 2009, the applicant/subgrantee must submit the request for
arbitration, as well as a withdrawal of the pending appeal, if
applicable, simultaneously to the Grantee, the applicable FEMA Regional
Administrator, and the arbitration administrator by October 30, 2009.
Otherwise, if the applicant/subgrantee seeks arbitration, it must
request arbitration in writing to the Grantee within 30 calendar days
after receipt of notice of the determination that is the subject of the
arbitration request, or by September 30, 2009, whichever is later.
Issues that may be arbitrated would be the same as those that are
normally subject to appeal, provided the total amount of the project is
greater than $500,000. As an example, a subgrantee could appeal the
amount of the FEMA-approved costs, where the subgrantee believes the
eligible amount should be greater. Examples of second appeals can be
found at https://www.fema.gov/appeals/.
E. Submission by the Grantee
Within 15 calendar days of receipt of the applicant's or
subgrantee's request for arbitration, the Grantee may forward a written
recommendation in support or opposition of the applicant's or
subgrantee's request simultaneously to the FEMA Regional Administrator,
the arbitration administrator, and the applicant. In addition, the
Grantee must forward the name and address of the Grantee's authorized
representative or counsel.
In selecting 15 calendar days, FEMA is implementing the intent of
the ARRA. The Act specifically requires the arbitration process to
``expedite'' recovery efforts from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. A 15-
calendar-day time limit is intended to expedite the resolution of the
applicant's or subgrantee's dispute. However, this 15-day time period
will allow sufficient time for the Grantee to review the request and
prepare a recommendation without delaying the arbitration process.
F. Submission of FEMA's Response
Within 30 calendar days of receipt of the applicant's or
subgrantee's request, FEMA will simultaneously submit a response in
support of its position, a copy of the project worksheet(s), and any
supporting information to the arbitration administrator, the Grantee,
and the applicant/subgrantee.
G. Selection of Arbitrators
The arbitration panels will be composed of three judges drawn from
the Federal pool of current and senior administrative law judges and
other similar officials serving in adjudicative capacities on boards,
commissions and agencies. Each panel will be selected by the
arbitration administrator. The individuals assigned to any one panel
may change from case to case, as assigned by the arbitration
administrator. The arbitration administrator will notify all parties to
the arbitration of the names and identities of the arbitrators selected
for the panel.
H. Preliminary Conference
Within 10 business days of the panel's receipt of FEMA's response
to the request for arbitration, a preliminary conference will be held
by telephone with the arbitrators, the parties and/or their
representatives. The preliminary conference may address such issues as
the future conduct of the case, including clarification of the issues
and claims, possible arbitrator disqualification, the scheduling of
hearings and the hearing location, if applicable, and other
administrative matters.
I. Hearing
The panel will provide the applicant/subgrantee and FEMA with an
opportunity to make an oral presentation in person, by telephone
conference, or other means during which all the parties may
simultaneously hear all other participants. If the applicant/subgrantee
or FEMA would like to request a hearing, it must be requested no later
than the preliminary conference. The panel will determine the hearing
location, and its decision will be final and binding. The panel will
endeavor to hold the hearing within 60 calendar days of the preliminary
conference, unless the panel postpones the hearing upon agreement of
the parties, or at the request of a party for good cause shown. If the
hearing is postponed, the panel will set a new date within 10 business
days of the postponement.
The parties may not engage in discovery or provide additional paper
submissions at the hearing. Each party may present its position through
oral presentations by individuals designated in advance of the hearing.
If the panel deems it appropriate or necessary, it may request
additional written materials from either or both parties or seek the
advice or expertise of independent scientific or technical subject
matter experts, such as engineers and architects.
J. Review by the Arbitration Panel
In its review, the arbitration panel will consider all relevant
written materials provided by the parties and the Grantee. If a hearing
is held, the panel will also consider the oral presentations made at
the hearing. In addition, the panel may, if it deems appropriate or
necessary, seek the
[[Page 44764]]
advice or expertise of independent scientific or technical subject
matter experts, such as engineers or architects.
K. Decision: Time Limits
The panel will make every effort to issue a written decision within
60 calendar days after the panel declares the hearing closed, or if an
oral presentation was not requested, within 60 calendar days following
the receipt of FEMA's response to the request for arbitration. In
general, 60 days is a reasonable time for a panel to review the
determination, discuss the issues involved, and issue a decision. It is
shorter than the 90 days allotted for first and second level appeals
under the appeals process, and in keeping with the purpose of the
arbitration provision--to expedite the recovery process.
However, the issues involved in Public Assistance determinations
can be technical and complex. In cases involving highly technical and
complex matters, a decision of the panel may take longer than 60 days.
The appeal regulation allows additional time for review of an appeal
when highly technical issues are involved. See 44 CFR 206.206(d).
Similarly, this regulation provides for the possibility that the
arbitration panel will not be able to render a decision within 60 days
on such issues.
L. Finality of Decision
A decision of the majority of the panel will constitute a final
decision, binding on all parties. Final decisions are not subject to
further administrative review. Final decisions are not subject to
judicial review, except as permitted by 9 U.S.C. 10.
M. Ex Parte Communications
No party, and no one acting on behalf of any party, will have ex
parte communications with an arbitrator. This means that neither the
applicant/subgrantee, the Grantee, nor FEMA may communicate with an
arbitrator about a particular arbitration without the participation of
the other parties or their representatives. If a party engages in an ex
parte communication, the party engaged in such communication must
provide a summary or a transcript of the entire communication to the
other parties.
N. Costs
FEMA will pay the fees of the arbitrators, the costs of any expert
retained by the panel and the arbitration facility costs, if any. The
expenses for each party, including attorney's fees, representative
fees, copying costs, costs associated with attending any hearing, and
any other fees not specifically listed in the regulation must be paid
by the party incurring the expense.
O. Guidance
FEMA will issue separate guidance as necessary to supplement this
regulation.
III. Regulatory Analysis
A. Administrative Procedure Act
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires an agency to
publish a rule for public comment prior to implementation. 5 U.S.C.
553. The APA, however, provides an exception to this requirement for
rules of agency procedure or practice. 5 U.S.C. 553 (b)(3)(A).
This rule implements section 601 of the ARRA by detailing how a
Public Assistance applicant or subgrantee may request arbitration. It
is therefore, a procedural rule; it establishes procedures for making
an arbitration request and the procedures FEMA will follow in issuing
an arbitration decision. The rule does not affect eligibility under the
Public Assistance program; rather, it adds an option for review of
Public Assistance applications to expedite recovery efforts. FEMA
already provides for review of these determinations through the appeal
provisions of 44 CFR 206.206. This rule simply provides an alternate
procedure for seeking such a review of FEMA determinations.
Further, because this rule is procedural in nature and does not
confer any substantive rights, benefits or obligations, FEMA finds that
this rule shall become effective immediately upon publication of this
final rule in the Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
B. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866, regulatory actions are subject to
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and the requirements of
the Executive Order. The Executive Order defines ``significant
regulatory action'' as one that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
This rule is entirely voluntary. Applicants are not required to
seek arbitration under the authority and requirements of this rule.
This rule provides an additional option to applicants/subgrantees in
lieu of appeal. For those that choose to undergo arbitration, this rule
will result in a total cost increase of $389,363 to applicants/
subgrantees, and a cost savings of $4,242 to Grantees. This rule is not
an economically significant regulatory action as defined in Executive
Order 12866. This is not a significant rule under Executive Order
12866; therefore, OMB has not reviewed this rule.
Under FEMA's standard appeal procedures, an applicant/subgrantee
must file an appeal with documentation supporting the appeal within 60
days of the decision that is being appealed. The Grantee then forwards
the request to the Regional Administrator within 60 days of receipt,
and in doing so may submit a written recommendation to FEMA. The
Regional Administrator then reviews the appeal and either makes a
determination or seeks additional information from the applicant within
90 days.
If the Regional Administrator denies the appeal, the applicant/
subgrantee may submit a second appeal to the Grantee within 60 days of
the Regional Administrator's denial. The Grantee must forward the
second appeal to the Regional Administrator within 60 days of receipt.
The Regional Administrator then forwards the second appeal to FEMA
headquarters as soon as possible. Upon receipt, FEMA headquarters
either requests additional information, requests independent scientific
or technical analysis from experts, or makes a determination within 90
days.
Under the arbitration procedures contained in this rule, an
applicant/subgrantee must submit a request for arbitration, with
documentation supporting the request, simultaneously to the Grantee,
applicable FEMA Regional Administrator, and the arbitration
administrator. For those that do not have a pending appeal with FEMA,
this request is due within 30 days of receipt of notice of the
determination that is the subject of the arbitration request. If there
is an appeal pending with FEMA, or if FEMA has issued a decision on a
first or second level appeal on or after February 17, 2009, the request
for arbitration with supporting documentation, and if
[[Page 44765]]
applicable, a statement that they withdraw the pending appeal, must be
sent simultaneously to the Grantee, the applicable FEMA Regional
Administrator, and the arbitration administrator by October 30, 2009.
The Grantee may forward a recommendation to the Regional Administrator
and the arbitration administrator, with a copy to the applicant, within
15 days of receipt from the applicant/subgrantee.
Once formed, the panel will conduct a preliminary conference by
telephone, and if requested, the parties will be provided a hearing to
make an oral presentation in person, by telephone conference or other
means during which all the parties may simultaneously hear all other
participants. The location will be chosen by the panel. The panel may,
if it deems appropriate or necessary, seek the advice or expertise of
independent scientific or technical subject matter experts, or request
additional information from the parties. The panel will then endeavor
to issue a written decision within 60 days after the hearing or, if
there is no hearing, after receipt of FEMA's response to the request
for arbitration.
As of July 17, 2009, FEMA had 2,188 project worksheets that had not
yet received an initial determination from FEMA as well as 44 pending
appeals for disasters DR-1603, DR-1604, DR-1605, DR-1606, and DR-1607
that are for projects over $500,000. Adding the 44 existing appeals to
the 2,188 projects which may result in appealable determinations
creates a total of 2,232 potential projects that may be eligible for
arbitration. Not all project worksheets will have contested
determinations that will result in arbitration, and not all pending
appeals will be withdrawn in favor of arbitration. To generate the cost
estimates for this rulemaking, FEMA used existing data for first
appeals. FEMA receives an average of 364 appeals per year.
Conservatively estimating that 80 percent of those appeals involve
large projects, FEMA estimates that 291 appeals are associated with the
total 5,008 large projects obligated by FEMA per year. As a result,
FEMA estimates that 5.81 percent of large projects are appealed (5.81%
= 291/5,008). By applying this percentage, FEMA estimates that 127
appeals are expected from the 2,188 large projects over $500,000 that
have not yet received an initial determination from FEMA for disasters
DR-1693, DR-1604, DR-1605, DR-1606, and DR-1607 (5.81% x 2,188 = 127).
The arbitration process requires the applicant/subgrantee to submit
a request for arbitration simultaneously to the Grantee, the applicable
FEMA Regional Administrator, and the arbitration administrator in the
form of a written statement from the applicant/subgrantee, which FEMA
conservatively estimates will take an applicant/subgrantee
approximately one hour to complete.\2\ Within 15 days of receipt of the
request for arbitration, the Grantee may forward a recommendation to
FEMA and the arbitration administrator (with a copy to the applicant/
subgrantee), which FEMA estimates will take the Grantee approximately
one hour to complete. FEMA therefore estimates that it will take 127
applicants/subgrantees a cumulative 127 hours to prepare requests for
arbitration and the four potential Grantees (the States of LA, MS, TX,
and AL) a cumulative 127 hours to prepare and forward their
recommendation to FEMA and the arbitration administrator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This figure was generated using similar estimates from other
Federal agencies requests for arbitration. For example, National
Mediation Board receives about 80 ``Requests for Arbitration Panel
for Airline System Boards of Adjustment'' annually with a burden
estimate of 20 hours per year (74 FR 10098); or Federal Mediation
and Conciliation Service's ``Request for Arbitration Services''
form, receiving approximately 10,000 per year and estimating about
10 minutes to complete (71 FR 69130).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEMA obtained the national average hourly wage for a managerial
($36.50) position in State government from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (2009) ``May 2007 National Industry-specific Occupational
Employment and Wage Estimates'', NAICS 999200--State Government (OES
Designation). The managerial wage rate was for the ``General and
Operations Managers position (standard occupational classification
(SOC) code : 11-1021).'' The Bureau of Labor Statistics'
hourly wage reflects only the direct cost of employment. FEMA,
therefore, multiplied the wage rates by 1.4 to derive the full
employment costs for a managerial ($51.10) position in State
government. FEMA estimates that it will take applicants/subgrantees and
Grantees the same amount of time to prepare requests for arbitration as
it takes them to prepare requests for appeal. Therefore, FEMA estimates
that this rulemaking will result in a cost savings of $6,490 (= 127 x
51.10) for applicants/subgrantees and $6,490 (= 127 x 51.10) for
Grantees. These cost savings occur because there is no requirement for
an applicant/subgrantee to resubmit documentation through a second
round of review to exhaust its administrative remedies under
arbitration, as there is in the appeals process. This method is
intended to reduce the administrative burden on applicants/subgrantees.
Applicant/subgrantees may only seek one method for resolution of the
dispute--appeal or arbitration--not both.
In addition to the 2,188 project worksheets which have not yet
received an initial determination from FEMA, as noted above, as of July
17, 2009, FEMA currently has 44 pending appeals. Although it is not
expected that all of these appeals will be withdrawn in favor of
arbitration, as a conservative estimate for the purposes of this
analysis, FEMA estimates that all 44 will withdraw in favor of
arbitration. Therefore these applicants/subgrantees will also submit a
request for arbitration containing a statement that they withdraw their
appeal. FEMA estimates it will take the applicant/subgrantee
approximately one hour to prepare its request and the Grantee one hour
to prepare its recommendation and forward it to FEMA and the
arbitration administrator. Using the $51.10 wage rate established
above, FEMA estimates that this change will have a total cost of $2,248
(= 44 x $51.10) to applicants/subgrantees and $2,248 (= 44 x $51.10) to
Grantees.
The panel will conduct a preliminary conference by telephone, and
if requested, the parties will make an oral presentation in person, by
telephone conference or other means during which all the parties may
simultaneously hear all other participants at a location designated by
the panel. In person appearance at a hearing is entirely voluntary, at
the applicant's/subgrantee's discretion. If they choose to appear,
however, the costs to do so are incurred by the applicant/subgrantee.
Because the hearings may be conducted via telephone or other means
during which all the parties may simultaneously hear all other
participants, most applicants are not expected to have any travel
costs. For those who are granted an in-person hearing, the panel may
choose to have the hearing in Washington, DC. It is also likely that
more than one person will attend. This is based on FEMA's experience
meeting with applicants on second appeals, which usually involves about
six people. This includes representatives from the applicant, the
State, and any consultants. Assuming round trip air travel for a team
of six people and that 25 percent of the applicants/subgrantees will
make an in-person appearance, (43 = 25% x (127 + 44)), FEMA estimates
that the travel cost to applicants/subgrantees will be
[[Page 44766]]
$89,526 (= 43 x 6 x $347 \3\)). In addition, should an applicant/
subgrantee choose to appear in person, it will incur (1) lodging,
meals, and incidental expenses, and (2) the regular-time cost of the
employee who attends the hearing in lieu of performing that employee's
regular duties. Assuming that attendance at a hearing will require two
work days to travel to and attend the hearing, lodging, meals, and
incidental expenses will be $93,138 (= 43 x 6 people x $361 \4\). The
time cost to applicants/subgrantees will be $210,941 (= 43 x 6 people x
16 hours x $51.10). Therefore, the total cost to applicants/subgrantees
for in-person presentation at a hearing is estimated to be $393,605 (=
$89,526 + $93,138 + $210,941).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Average domestic airfare in the 4th quarter of 2008 from the
U.S. Department of Transportation's Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS), May 6, 2009, https://www.bts.gov/press_releases/2009/bts021_09/html/bts021_09.html.
\4\ The amount of $361 includes hotel expense for one night, and
meals and incidental expenses for two days. The per diem rate for
the District of Columbia is obtained from the U.S. General Services
Administration, May 2009, https://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/
contentView.do?queryYear=2009&contentType=GSA--
BASIC&contentId=17943&queryState=District+of+Columbia&noc=T.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEMA will pay the fees of the arbitrators, the costs of any expert
retained by the panel, and the arbitration facility costs, if any. Even
though FEMA cannot quantify this cost change, it is not likely to be
economically significant given the number of arbitrations expected from
disasters DR-1603, DR-1604, DR-1605, DR-1606, and DR-1607.
Additionally, it will save the Federal government the time and costs it
would have incurred to process appeals. FEMA estimates that this rule
will result in a cost increase of $389,363 to applicants/subgrantees,
and a cost saving of $4,242 to Grantees. Table 1 details the impact of
the final rule. FEMA did not annualize the impact because this rule
applies only to disasters DR-1603, DR-1604, DR-1605, DR-1606, and DR-
1607. FEMA has determined that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact of $100 million or more per year.
Table 1--Quantified Impact of the Final Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants/
Subgrantees Grantees
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requests for arbitration................ -$6,490
Requests forwarded for arbitration...... .............. -$6,490
Withdraw in favor of arbitration........ 2,248 2,248
In-person presentation.................. 393,605 ..............
-------------------------------
Sub-total........................... 389,363 -4,242
-------------------------------
Grand Total..................... 385,121
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and
section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121, 110 Stat. 847, 858-9 (Mar. 29, 1996)
(5 U.S.C. 601 note) require that special consideration be given to the
effects of proposed regulations on small entities. The RFA mandates
that an agency conduct a RFA analysis when an agency is ``required by
section 553 * * * to publish general notice of proposed rulemaking for
any proposed rule.'' 5 U.S.C. 603(a). Accordingly, an RFA is not
required when a rule is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking under
5 U.S.C. 553(b). FEMA has determined that this rule is exempt from
notice and comment rulemaking because it is a rule of agency procedure.
See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A). Therefore, an RFA analysis under 5 U.S.C.
603 is not required for this rule.
D. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
This rulemaking is categorically excluded from further review under
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Public Law 91-190, 83
Stat. 852 (Jan. 1, 1970) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as amended. Action
taken or assistance provided under sections 403, 406, and 407 of the
Stafford Act are statutorily excluded from NEPA and the preparation of
environmental impact statements and environmental assessments by
section 316 of the Stafford Act. 42 U.S.C. 5159; 44 CFR 10.8(c). NEPA
implementing regulations governing FEMA activities at 44 CFR
10.8(d)(2)(ii) categorically exclude the preparation, revision, and
adoption of regulations from the preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact statement, where the rule relates to
actions that qualify for categorical exclusions. Action taken or
assistance provided under sections 403 and 407 of the Stafford Act are
categorically excluded under 44 CFR 10.8(d)(2)(xix). Because no other
extraordinary circumstances have been identified, this rule does not
require the preparation of either an environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement as defined by NEPA.
E. Executive Order 12898, Environmental Justice
Under Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations, 59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994, FEMA incorporates
environmental justice into its policies and programs. The Executive
Order requires each Federal agency to conduct its programs, policies,
and activities that substantially affect human health or the
environment, in a manner that ensures that those programs, policies,
and activities do not have the effect of excluding persons from
participation in our programs, denying persons the benefits of our
programs, or subjecting persons to discrimination because of their
race, color, or national origin.
No action that FEMA can anticipate under this rule will have a
disproportionately high or adverse human health and environmental
effect on any segment of the population. Accordingly, the requirements
of Executive Order 12898 do not apply to this rule.
F. Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking
FEMA has sent this final rule to the Congress and to the Government
Accountability Office under the Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking Act, (``Congressional Review Act''), Public Law 104-121, 110
Stat. 873 (Mar. 29, 1996) (5 U.S.C. 804). This rule is not a ``major
rule'' within the meaning of the Congressional Review Act.
[[Page 44767]]
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law 104-4, 109
Stat. 48 (Mar. 22, 1995) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.), applies to any notice
of proposed rulemaking that would implement any rule which includes a
Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year. If the rulemaking includes a Federal
mandate, the Act requires an agency to prepare an assessment of the
anticipated costs and benefits of the Federal mandate. The Act also
pertains to any regulatory requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Before establishing any such
requirements, an agency must develop a plan allowing for input from the
affected governments regarding the requirements. FEMA has determined
that this rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, nor by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year as a result of a Federal mandate,
and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. In
light of the foregoing, FEMA has determined that no actions are deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
H. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132, Federalism, 64 FR 43255, August 4, 1999,
sets forth principles and criteria that agencies must adhere to in
formulating and implementing policies that have federalism
implications, that is, regulations that have substantial direct effects
on the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
among the various levels of government. Federal agencies must closely
examine the statutory authority supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the States, and to the extent
practicable, must consult with State and local officials before
implementing any such action. This final rule involves no policies that
have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rule contains a collection of information that is subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), as amended, Public Law 104-13, 109 Stat.
163, (May 22, 1995) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The information collection
included in this rule is approved by OMB under control number 1660-
0017, Public Assistance Progress Report and Program Forms.
J. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments, 65 FR 67249, Nov. 9, 2000, applies to agency
regulations that have Tribal implications, that is, regulations that
have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. Under this Executive Order, to the extent
practicable and permitted by law, no agency may promulgate any
regulation that has Tribal implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal governments, and that is not
required by statute, unless funds necessary to pay the direct costs
incurred by the Indian Tribal government or the Tribe in complying with
the regulation are provided by the Federal Government, or the agency
consults with Tribal officials.
There is no substantial direct compliance cost associated with this
rule. This rule would not affect the distribution of power or
responsibilities of Tribal governments.
K. Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
FEMA has reviewed this rule under Executive Order 12630,
``Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights'' (53 FR 8859, Mar. 18, 1988) as supplemented by
Executive Order 13406, ``Protecting the Property Rights of the American
People'' (71 FR 36973, June 28, 2006). This rule will not affect the
taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630.
L. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
FEMA has reviewed this rule under Executive Order 12988, ``Civil
Justice Reform'' (61 FR 4729, Feb. 7, 1996). This rule meets applicable
standards to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 206
Administrative practice and procedure, Coastal zone, Community
facilities, Disaster assistance, Fire prevention, Grant programs-
housing and community development, Housing, Insurance,
Intergovernmental relations, Loan programs--housing and community
development, Natural resources, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency amends 44 CFR part 206, subpart G, as follows:
PART 206--FEDERAL DISASTER ASSISTANCE
0
1. The authority citation for part 206 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 through 5207; Reorganization Plan No.
3 of 1978, 43 FR 41943, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; Homeland Security
Act of 2002, 6 U.S.C. 101; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR, 1979
Comp., p. 376; E.O. 12148, 44 FR 43239, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 412;
and E.O. 13286, 68 FR 10619, 3 CFR, 2003 Comp., p. 166.
0
2. Add Sec. 206.209 to read as follows:
Sec. 206.209 Arbitration for Public Assistance determinations related
to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (Major disaster declarations DR-1603,
DR-1604, DR-1605, DR-1606, and DR-1607).
(a) Scope. Pursuant to section 601 of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, Public Law 111-5, this section establishes
procedures for arbitration to resolve disputed Public Assistance
applications under the following major disaster declarations: DR-1603,
DR-1604, DR-1605, DR-1606, and DR-1607.
(b) Applicability. An applicant or subgrantee (hereinafter
``applicant'' for purposes of this section) may request arbitration of
a determination made by FEMA on an application for Public Assistance,
provided that the total amount of the project is greater than $500,000,
and provided that:
(1) the applicant is eligible to file an appeal under Sec.
206.206; or
(2) the applicant had a first or second level appeal pending with
FEMA pursuant to Sec. 206.206 on or after February 17, 2009.
(c) Governing rules. An applicant that elects arbitration agrees to
abide by this section and applicable guidance. The arbitration will be
conducted pursuant to procedure established by the arbitration panel.
(d) Limitations--(1) Election of remedies. A request for
arbitration under this section is in lieu of filing or continuing an
appeal under Sec. 206.206.
(2) Final agency action under Sec. 206.206. Arbitration is not
available for any matter that obtained final agency
[[Page 44768]]
action by FEMA pursuant to Sec. 206.206 prior to February 17, 2009.
Arbitration is not available for determinations for which the applicant
failed to file a timely appeal under the provisions of Sec. 206.206
prior to August 31, 2009, or for determinations which received a
decision on a second appeal from FEMA prior to February 17, 2009.
(e) Request for arbitration--(1) Content of request. The request
for arbitration must contain a written statement and all documentation
supporting the position of the applicant, the disaster number, and the
name and address of the applicant's authorized representative or
counsel.
(2) Submission by the applicant to the Grantee, the FEMA Regional
Administrator, and the arbitration administrator. An applicant under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section must submit its request for
arbitration in writing simultaneously to the Grantee, the FEMA Regional
Administrator, and the arbitration administrator within 30 calendar
days after receipt of notice of the determination that is the subject
of the arbitration request or by September 30, 2009, whichever is
later. An applicant under paragraph (b)(2) of this section must make a
request for arbitration in writing and, if FEMA has not issued a
decision on the appeal, submit a withdrawal of the pending appeal,
simultaneously to the Grantee, the FEMA Regional Administrator, and the
arbitration administrator by October 30, 2009.
(3) Submission by the Grantee to the arbitration administrator and
FEMA. Within 15 calendar days of receipt of the applicant's request for
arbitration, the Grantee must forward the name and address of the
Grantee's authorized representative or counsel, and may forward a
written recommendation in support or opposition to the applicant's
request for arbitration, simultaneously to the FEMA Regional
Administrator, the arbitration administrator, and the applicant.
(4) Submission of FEMA's response. FEMA will submit a memorandum in
support of its position, a copy of the Project Worksheet(s), and any
other supporting information, as well as the name and address of its
authorized representative or counsel, simultaneously to the arbitration
administrator, the Grantee, and the applicant, within 30 calendar days
of receipt of the applicant's request for arbitration.
(5) Process for submissions. When submitting a request for
arbitration, the applicant should describe its claim with sufficient
detail so that the circumstances of the dispute are clear to the
arbitration panel. All papers, notices, or other documents submitted to
the arbitration administrator under this section by the applicant, the
Grantee, or FEMA will be served on each party's authorized
representative or counsel. The submitting party will make such service
by courier or overnight delivery service (such as Federal Express, DHL,
United Parcel Service, or the United States Postal Service overnight
delivery), addressed to the party, representative, or counsel, as
applicable, at its last known address.
(f) Selection of arbitration panel. The arbitration administrator
will select the arbitration panel for arbitration and notify the
applicant, FEMA, and the Grantee of the names and identities of the
arbitrators selected for the panel.
(g) Preliminary conference. The arbitration panel will hold a
preliminary conference with the parties and/or representatives of the
parties within 10 business days of the panel's receipt of FEMA's
response to the request for arbitration. The panel and the parties will
discuss the future conduct of the arbitration, including clarification
of the disputed issues, request for disqualification of an arbitrator
(if applicable), and any other preliminary matters. The date and place
of any oral hearing will be set at the preliminary conference. The
preliminary conference will be conducted by telephone.
(h) Hearing--(1) Request for hearing. The panel will provide the
applicant and FEMA with an opportunity to make an oral presentation on
the substance of the applicant's claim in person, by telephone
conference, or other means during which all the parties may
simultaneously hear all other participants. If the applicant or FEMA
would like to request an oral hearing, the request must be made no
later than the preliminary conference.
(2) Location of hearing. If an in-person hearing is authorized, it
will be held at a hearing facility of the arbitration panel's choosing.
(3) Conduct of hearing. Each party may present its position through
oral presentations by individuals designated in advance of the hearing.
These presentations may reference documents submitted pursuant to
paragraph (e) of this section; the parties may not provide additional
paper submissions at the hearing. If the panel deems it appropriate or
necessary, it may request additional written materials from either or
both parties or seek the advice or expertise of independent scientific
or technical subject matter experts.
(4) Closing of hearing. The panel will inquire of each party
whether it has any further argument. When satisfied that the record is
complete, the panel will declare the hearing closed, unless a post-
hearing submission of additional information or a memorandum of law is
to be provided in accordance with this paragraph. The hearing will be
declared closed as of the date set by the panel for the submission of
the additional information or the memorandum of law.
(5) Time limits. The panel will endeavor to hold the hearing within
60 calendar days of the preliminary conference.
(6) Postponement. The arbitration panel may postpone a hearing upon
agreement of the parties, or upon request of a party for good cause
shown. Within 10 business days of the postponement, the arbitration
panel will notify the parties of the rescheduled date of the hearing.
(7) Record of the hearing. There will be no recording of the
hearing, unless a party specifically requests and arranges for such
recording at its own expense.
(8) Post-hearing submission of additional information. A party may
file with the arbitration panel additional information or a memorandum
of law after the hearing upon the arbitration panel's request or upon
the request of one of the parties with the panel's consent. The panel
will set the time for submission of the additional information or the
memorandum of law.
(9) Reopening of hearing. The hearing may be reopened on the
panel's initiative under compelling circumstances at any time before
the decision is made.
(i) Review by the arbitration panel. (1) Determination of
timeliness. Upon notification by FEMA, or on its own initiative, the
arbitration panel will determine whether the applicant timely filed a
request for arbitration.
(2) Substantive review. The arbitration panel will consider all
relevant written materials provided by the applicant, the Grantee, and
FEMA, as well as oral presentations, if any. If the panel deems it
appropriate or necessary, it may request additional written materials
from either or both parties or seek the advice or expertise of
independent scientific or technical subject matter experts.
(j) Ex parte communications. No party and no one acting on behalf
of any party will engage in ex parte communications with a member of
the arbitration panel. If a party or someone acting on behalf of any
party engages in ex parte communications with a member of the
arbitration panel, the party that engaged in such communication will
provide a summary or a transcript of the entire communication to the
other parties.
[[Page 44769]]
(k) Decision--(1) Time limits. The panel will make every effort to
issue a written decision within 60 calendar days after the panel
declares the hearing closed pursuant to paragraph (h)(4) of this
section, or, if a hearing was not requested, within 60 calendar days
following the receipt of FEMA's response to the request for
arbitration. A decision of the panel may take longer than 60 calendar
days if the arbitration involves a highly technical or complex matter.
(2) Form and content. The decision of the panel will be in writing
and signed by each member of the panel. The panel will issue a reasoned
decision that includes a brief and informal discussion of the factual
and legal basis for the decision.
(3) Finality of decision. A decision of the majority of the panel
shall constitute a final decision, binding on all parties. Final
decisions are not subject to further administrative review. Final
decisions are not subject to judicial review, except as permitted by 9
U.S.C. 10.
(4) Delivery of decision. Notice and delivery of the decision will
be by facsimile or other electronic means and by regular mail to each
party or its authorized representative or counsel.
(l) Costs. FEMA will pay the fees associated with the arbitration
panel, the costs of any expert retained by the panel, and the
arbitration facility costs, if any. The expenses for each party,
including attorney's fees, representative fees, copying costs, costs
associated with attending any hearing, or any other fees not listed in
this paragraph will be paid by the party incurring such costs.
(m) Guidance. FEMA may issue separate guidance as necessary to
supplement this section.
Dated: August 14, 2009.
Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-19994 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P