Assistance Regulations, 44273-44278 [E9-20299]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 166 / Friday, August 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
December 18, 2008, and discussed these
issues in detail. Those meetings were
also public meetings and both large and
small entities were able to participate
and express their views.
An interim final rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on March 9, 2009. Copies of the
rule were mailed by the Committee’s
staff to all Committee members and
alternates, and raisin handlers. In
addition, the rule was made available
through the Internet by USDA and the
Office of the Federal Register. That rule
provided a 60-day comment period
which ended May 8, 2009. No
comments were received during the
comment period.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?
template=TemplateN&page=
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at
the previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation and other
information, it is found that finalizing
the interim final rule, without change,
as published in the Federal Register (74
FR 9951, March 9, 2009) will tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 989—RAISINS PRODUCED
FROM GRAPES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 989 which was
published at 74 FR 9951 on March 9,
2009, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
■
Dated: August 24, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–20766 Filed 8–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Parts 600 and 1024
RIN 1991–AB77
Assistance Regulations
AGENCY:
Department of Energy.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Aug 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) amends its Financial Assistance
Regulations to update, streamline, and
simplify the general rules. DOE also
removes regulations governing the DOE
Financial Assistance Appeals Board.
DATES: This rulemaking is effective
September 28, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jacqueline Kniskern, Office of
Procurement and Assistance Policy,
U.S. Department of Energy, at 202–287–
1342, or by e-mail at
jacqueline.kniskern@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act of 1980
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1980
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
K. Approval by the Office of the Secretary
of Energy
I. Background
DOE has been actively engaged in the
government-wide effort to streamline
and simplify the application,
administrative and reporting procedures
for Federal financial assistance
programs pursuant to the Federal
Financial Assistance Management
Improvement Act of 1999, Public Law
106–107.
As part of this initiative, DOE has
solicited comments and suggestions
from the grant community and made
changes to its assistance regulations. In
particular, the DOE added to 10 CFR
part 600 Subpart D, Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements with For-Profit
Organizations, in a rule published in the
Federal Register at 68 FR 50645 on
August 21, 2003.
DOE has also incorporated policy
directives issued by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) that
established a standard format for
Federal agency announcements of
funding opportunities under programs
that award discretionary grants or
cooperative agreements, established
standard data elements for
electronically posting synopses of
Federal agencies’ announcements of
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44273
funding opportunities, and required
Federal agencies to post synopses of
their discretionary grant and
cooperative agreement funding
opportunity announcements on the
Grants.gov Web site, https://
www.Grants.gov. The final rule
incorporating these policy directives
was published in the Federal Register at
69 FR 7865 on February 20, 2004. In
addition, DOE developed a standard
format for its funding opportunity
announcements and revised systems to
comply with the new posting
requirements.
On May 16, 2008, a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) was
published in the Federal Register (73
FR 28385) that detailed changes to
update, streamline and simplify the
general rules in 10 CFR 600, Subpart A
of its Financial Assistance Rules. The
NOPR also proposed to remove the
regulations at 10 CFR part 1024
governing the DOE Financial Assistance
Appeals Board. This Board was
abolished when DOE’s Energy Board of
Contract Appeals was merged into the
Civilian Board of Contract Appeals as
required by Section 847 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2006, Public Law 109–163.
DOE received no comments from
members of the public in response to
the NOPR. Nevertheless, DOE made the
following technical changes to the text
of the rule.
1. Section 600.5(d) is revised to add
a reference to Section 600.352 after
600.162 and 600.243.
2. Section 600.7(c) is revised to show
the referenced Sections to be 600.144,
60.236 and 600.331.
3. Section 600.25(a)(2) is revised to
correct the modifying ‘‘An’’ to ‘‘A’’.
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
This regulatory action has been
determined not to be ‘‘a significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993). Accordingly, this action is not
subject to review under that Executive
Order by the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Review Under Regulatory Flexibility
Act of 1980
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis for any rule that by law must
be proposed for public comment, unless
the agency certifies that the rule, if
promulgated, will not have a significant
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
44274
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 166 / Friday, August 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As required by
Executive Order 13272, ‘‘Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking’’ (67 FR 53461,
August 16, 2002), DOE published
policies and procedures to ensure that
the potential impacts of its draft rules
on small entities are properly
considered during the rulemaking
process (68 FR 7990, February 19, 2003),
and has made them available on the
Office of General Counsel’s Web site:
https://www.gc.doe.gov. DOE has
reviewed today’s rule under the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act and the procedures and policies
published on February 19, 2003.
Today’s final rule subjects small entities
either to requirements that parallel
government-wide requirements that
OMB Circular A–110 establishes for
other assistance awards, or to less
burdensome requirements that enable
firms from the commercial marketplace
to participate in DOE research,
development, and demonstration
projects. Today’s proposed amendments
would not alter the substance of the
OMB requirements or impose significant
additional burdens. On the basis of the
foregoing, DOE certifies that this rule
does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. DOE did not prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis for this
rulemaking.
C. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995
This regulatory action will not impose
any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements subject to
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act
DOE has concluded that promulgation
of this rule falls into a class of actions
that would not individually or
cumulatively have a significant impact
on the human environment, as
determined by DOE’s regulations
implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Specifically, this
rule establishes guidelines and
procedures for application and review,
administration, audit and closeout of
assistance instruments, and, therefore, is
covered under the Categorical Exclusion
in paragraph A6 of Appendix A to
Subpart D, 10 CFR Part 1021.
Accordingly, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental
impact statement is required.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Aug 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, 64 FR 43255
(August 4, 1999), imposes certain
requirements on agencies formulating
and implementing policies or
regulations that preempt State law or
that have federalism implications.
Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States and carefully assess the necessity
for such actions. DOE has examined
today’s rule and has determined that it
does not preempt state law and does not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. No further action
is required by Executive Order 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform,’’ 61 FR 4729, (February 7,
1996), imposes on executive agencies
the general duty to adhere to the
following requirements: (1) Eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3)
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard; and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of
Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that executive agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
specifies any effect on existing Federal
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and
burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the United States
Attorney General. Section 3(c) of
Executive Order 12988 requires
executive agencies to review regulations
in light of applicable standards in
sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine
whether they are met or if it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of
them. DOE has completed the required
review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, this rule meets
the relevant standards of Executive
Order 12988.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
G. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) generally
requires Federal agencies to examine
closely the impacts of regulatory actions
on State, local, tribal governments.
Subsection 101(5) of title I of that law
defines a Federal intergovernmental
mandate to include a regulation that
would impose upon State, local, or
tribal governments an enforceable duty,
except a condition of Federal assistance
or a duty arising from participating in a
voluntary Federal program. Title II of
that law requires each Federal agency to
assess the effects of Federal regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or the
private sector, other than to the extent
such actions merely incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in a
statute. Section 202 of the title requires
a Federal agency to perform a detailed
assessment of the anticipated costs and
benefits of any rule that includes a
Federal mandate which may result in
costs to State, local, or tribal
governments, or the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation). 2
U.S.C. 1532(a) and (b). Section 204 of
that title requires each agency that
proposed a rule containing a significant
Federal intergovernmental mandate to
develop an effective process for
obtaining meaningful and timely input
from elected officers of State, local, and
tribal governments. 2 U.S.C. 1534.
This rule amends the assistance
regulations to streamline and simplify
procedures for soliciting, awarding, and
administering financial assistance
agreements. The rule does not result in
the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in aggregate, or by
the private sector of $100 million or
more in any one year. Accordingly, no
assessment or analysis is required under
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any
proposed rule or policy that may affect
family well-being. This rule will not
have any impact on the autonomy or
integrity of the family as an institution.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policy Assessment.
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 166 / Friday, August 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
I. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001,
44 U.S.C. 3516 note, provides for
agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under
implementing guidelines established by
each agency pursuant to general
guidelines issued by OMB. OMB’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today’s rule under the OMB
and DOE guidelines and has concluded
that it is consistent with applicable
policies in those guidelines.
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to the OMB a
Statement of Energy Effects for any
proposed significant energy action. A
‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined as
any action by an agency that
promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule, and that:
(1) Is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866, or any
successor order; and (2) is likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy; or
(3) is designated by the Administrator of
OIRA as a significant energy action. For
any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
This regulatory action would not have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy
and is therefore not a significant energy
action. Accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
K. Approval by the Office of the
Secretary of Energy
The Office of the Secretary has
approved the issuance of this final rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Parts 600 and
1024
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 18,
2009.
Edward R. Simpson,
Director, Office of Procurement and Supply
Management, Office of Management,
Department of Energy.
Barbara H. Stearrett,
Acting Director, Office of Acquisition and
Assistance Management, National Nuclear
Security Administration.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, Part 600 of Chapter II, and
Part 1024 of Chapter X, Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, are
amended as follows:
■
PART 600—FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
RULES
1. The authority citation for part 600
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 31 U.S.C.
6301–6308; 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq., unless
otherwise noted.
§ 600.2
§ 600.3
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Aug 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Cost sharing or matching means that
portion of project or programs costs not
borne by the Federal Government.
*
*
*
*
*
Total Project Cost means all allowable
costs, as set forth in the applicable
Federal cost principles, incurred in
accomplishing the objective of the
project during the project period,
including the value of contributions
made by third parties and costs incurred
by Federally Funded Research and
Development Centers.
■ 4. Section 600.4 paragraph (a)(1) is
amended by revising the second
sentence to read as follows:
§ 600.4
Deviations.
(a) General. (1) * * * The use of
optional or discretionary provisions of
this part, including special restrictive
conditions used in accordance with
§§ 600.114, 600.212, and 600.304 are not
deviations. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
§ 600.5
Administrative practice and
procedure, Assistance programs.
[Amended]
2. Section 600.2 is amended in
paragraph (a) by removing
‘‘solicitations’’ and adding ‘‘funding
opportunity announcement’’ in its
place.
■ 3. Section 600.3 is amended in the
definition of ‘‘Amendment’’ by
capitalizing ‘‘Contracting Officer’’, and
by adding new definitions in
alphabetical order for ‘‘Cost sharing or
matching’’ and ‘‘Total Project Cost’’ to
read as follows:
■
Selection of Award Instrument.
5. Section 600.5, paragraph (d) is
amended by removing ‘‘§§ 600.162 and
■
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44275
600.243’’ and adding in its place
‘‘§§ 600.162, 600.243 and 600.352’’.
■ 6. Section 600.6 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 600.6
Eligibility.
(a) General. DOE shall solicit
applications for financial assistance in a
manner which provides for the
maximum amount of competition
feasible.
(b) Restricted eligibility. If DOE
restricts eligibility, an explanation of
why the restriction of eligibility is
considered necessary shall be included
in the funding opportunity
announcement, program rule, or
published notice.
(1) If the aggregate amount of DOE
funds available for award under a
funding opportunity announcement or
published notice is $1million or more,
unless authorized by statute or program
rule, such restriction of eligibility shall
be:
(i) Supported by a written
determination initiated by the program
office;
(ii) Concurred in by legal counsel and
the Contracting Officer; and
(iii) Approved by an official no less
than one level below the responsible
program Assistant Secretary, Deputy
Administrator, or other official of
equivalent authority.
(2) Where the amount of DOE funds
is less than $1 million, the cognizant
HCA and the Contracting Officer may
approve the determination.
(c) Noncompetitive financial
assistance. DOE may award a grant or
cooperative agreement on a
noncompetitive basis only if the
application satisfies one or more of the
following selection criteria:
(1) The activity to be funded is
necessary to the satisfactory completion
of, or is a continuation or renewal of, an
activity presently being funded by DOE
or another Federal agency, and for
which competition for support would
have a significant adverse effect on
continuity or completion of the activity.
(2) The activity is being or would be
conducted by the applicant using its
own resources or those donated or
provided by third parties; however, DOE
support of that activity would enhance
the public benefits to be derived and
DOE knows of no other entity which is
conducting or is planning to conduct
such an activity.
(3) The applicant is a unit of
government and the activity to be
supported is related to performance of a
governmental function within the
subject jurisdiction, thereby precluding
DOE provision of support to another
entity.
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
44276
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 166 / Friday, August 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(4) The applicant has exclusive
domestic capability to perform the
activity successfully, based upon unique
equipment, proprietary data, technical
expertise, or other such unique
qualifications.
(5) The award implements an
agreement between the United States
Government and a foreign government
to fund a foreign applicant.
(6) Time constraints associated with a
public health, safety, welfare or national
security requirement preclude
competition.
(7) The proposed project was
submitted as an unsolicited proposal
and represents a unique or innovative
idea, method, or approach that would
not be eligible for financial assistance
under a recent, current, or planned
funding opportunity announcement,
and if, as determined by DOE, a
competitive funding opportunity
announcement would not be
appropriate.
(8) The responsible program Assistant
Secretary, Deputy Administrator, or
other official of equivalent authority
determines that a noncompetitive award
is in the public interest. This authority
may not be delegated.
(d) Approval requirements. (1) Where
the amount of DOE funds is $1 million
or greater, determinations of
noncompetitive awards shall be:
(i) Documented in writing;
(ii) Concurred in by the responsible
program technical official and local
legal counsel; and
(iii) Approved, prior to award, by the
responsible program Assistant
Secretary, Deputy Administrator, or
official of equivalent authority and the
Contracting Officer. The approval
authority may be delegated to one
organizational level below the Assistant
Secretary, Deputy Administrator, or
official of equivalent authority.
(2) Where the amount of DOE funds
is less than $1 million, determinations
of noncompetitive awards shall be:
(i) Documented in writing;
(ii) Concurred in by local legal
counsel, unless for a particular award or
class of awards of $1 million or less,
review is waived by legal counsel; and
(iii) Approved by the cognizant HCA
and the Contracting Officer.
§ 600.7
[Amended]
7. Section 600.7, paragraph (c) is
amended by removing ‘‘Section 600.111
or Section 600.236’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘§§ 600.144, 600.236 and
600.331’’.
■ 8. Section 600.8 is amended as
follows:
■ a. The section title is revised as set
forth below.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
■
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Aug 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
■
b. In paragraph (a) introductory text,
the first sentence is amended by
removing ‘‘Program announcement’’ and
adding ‘‘Funding Opportunity
Announcements (FOA)’’ in its place.
■ c. In paragraph (a)(1), the last sentence
is amended by removing ‘‘Solicitations’’
and adding ‘‘FOAs’’ in its place.
■ d. In paragraph (a)(2) introductory
text, the first sentence is amended by
removing ‘‘program announcements’’
and adding ‘‘FOAs’’ in its place.
Assistance Award (NFAA) which
contains basic identifying and funding
information. The NFAA provides the
contents of the award including any
special terms and conditions, program
regulations, the National Policy
Assurances, and any other provisions
necessary to establish the respective
rights, duties, obligations, and
responsibilities of DOE and the
recipient, consistent with the
requirements of this part.
§ 600.8 Funding Opportunity
Announcement.
§ 600.18
*
*
*
*
*
9. Section 600.10 is amended as
follows:
■ a. In paragraph (b), the first sentence
is amended by removing ‘‘and in the
number of copies’’.
■ b. In paragraph (c)(1), the second
sentence is amended by removing ‘‘or
other approved DOE application form’’.
■ c. Paragraph (c)(4) is removed.
■ d. A new paragraph (f) is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 600.10
Form and content of applications,
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Registration is required in the
Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
for all applications. Information on
registration can be obtained at https://
www.ccr.gov/Grantees.aspx.
§§ 600.11 and 600.12
Reserved]
[Removed and
10. Sections 600.11 and 600.12 are
removed and reserved.
■
§ 600.14
[Reserved]
11. Section 600.14 is added and
reserved.
■
§ 600.15
[Amended]
12. Section 600.15, paragraph (b)(2) is
amended by removing ‘‘solicitation’’
and adding ‘‘funding opportunity
announcement’’ in its place.
■ 13. Section 600.16, is amended by
redesignating paragraph (b) as paragraph
(c), and by adding a new paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
Legal authority and effect of an
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Recipients are free to accept or
reject the award. A request to draw
down DOE funds constitutes
acceptance; however, DOE may require
formal acceptance of an award.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. Section 600.17 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 600.17
Contents of Award.
Each financial assistance award shall
be made on a Notice of Financial
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
§ 600.19
[Amended]
16. Section 600.19 is amended by
removing, in the second sentence,
‘‘briefly’’ and ‘‘and, if for grounds other
than unavailability of funds, shall offer
the unsuccessful applicant the
opportunity for a more detailed
explanation upon request’’.
■
§ 600.21
[Amended]
17. Section 600.21, paragraph (a) is
amended by removing ‘‘§§ 600.153 and
600.242’’ and adding in its place
‘‘§§ 600.153, 600.242 and 600.342’’.
■ 18. Section 600.22 is amended as
follows:
■ a. In the last sentence of paragraph (a),
the words ‘‘available in 10 CFR Part
1024’’ are removed.
■ b. Paragraphs (d) and (f)(1) are revised.
■ c. Paragraph (e) is amended by
removing ‘‘Board’’ and adding ‘‘SPE’’ in
its place, for every occurrence.
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 600.22
Disputes and appeals.
*
■
§ 600.16
award.
[Removed and Reserved]
15. Section 600.18 is removed and
reserved.
■
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
(d) Right of appeal. Except as
provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section, the final determination under
paragraph (c) of this section may be
appealed to the cognizant Senior
Procurement Executive (SPE) for either
DOE or the National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA). The mailing
address for the DOE SPE is Office of
Procurement and Assistance
Management, 1000 Independence Ave.,
SW, Washington, DC 20585. The
mailing address for the NNSA SPE is
Office of Acquisition and Supply
Management, 1000 Independence Ave.,
SW., Washington, DC 20585.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Review on appeal. (1) The SPE
shall have no jurisdiction to review
(i) Any preaward dispute (except as
provided in paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this
section), including use of any special
restrictive condition pursuant to
§§ 600.114, 600.212, or 600.304;
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 166 / Friday, August 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) DOE denial of a request for a
deviation under §§ 600.4, 600.103,
600.205, or 600.303 of this part;
(iii) DOE denial of a request for a
budget revision or other change in the
approved project under §§ 600.125,
600.127, 600.222, 600.230, 600.315, or
600.317 of this part or under another
term or condition of the award;
(iv) Any DOE action authorized under
§§ 600.162(a)(1), (2), (3) or (5),
600.243(a)(1), (a)(3), or 600.352(a)(1),
(2), (3) or (5) for suspensions only; or
§§ 600.162(a)(4), 600.243(a)(4) or
600.352(a)(4) for actions disapproving
renewal applications or other requests
for extension of time or additional
funding for the same project when
related to recipient noncompliance, or
such actions authorized by program
rule;
(v) Any DOE decision about an action
requiring prior DOE approval under
§§ 600.144, 600.236, or 600.331 of this
part or under another term or condition
of the award;
*
*
*
*
*
§ 600.23
[Removed and Reserved]
19. Section 600.23 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 600.24
[Amended]
20. Section 600.24 is amended in
paragraphs (a)(3) and (b) introductory
text by removing ‘‘or § 600.243(a)’’ and
adding ‘‘§§ 600.243(a), 600.312(g), or
600.352(a)’’ in its place.
■ 21. Section 600.25 is amended in:
■ a. Paragraph (a)(1) by removing ‘‘or
§ 600.243(a)’’ and adding ‘‘§§ 600.243(a)
or 600.352(a)’’ in its place.
■ b. Paragraph (a)(2) by removing ‘‘An’’
and adding ‘‘A’’ in its place and by
removing ‘‘§ 600.23’’ and adding ‘‘2 CFR
180 and 901’’ in its place.
■ c. Paragraph (b) is revised.
■ d. Paragraph (b)(5) by removing ‘‘and
§§ 600.250 through 600.252’’ and adding
‘‘§§ 600.250 through 600.252 and
§§ 600.350 through 600.353’’ in its
place.
■ e. Paragraph (d) by removing ‘‘or
§§ 600.243 through 600.244’’ and adding
‘‘§§ 600.243 through 600.244 or
§§ 600.350 through 600.353’’ in its
place.
■ f. Paragraph (f) by removing ‘‘or
§§ 600.243 through 600.244’’ and adding
‘‘§§ 600.243 through 600.244 or
§§ 600.350 through 600.353’’ in its
place.
The revision reads as follows:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
■
§ 600.25
Suspension and termination.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Notification requirements. Except
as provided in §§ 600.24, 600.162(a),
600.243(a), or 600.352(a) before
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Aug 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
suspending or terminating an award for
cause, DOE shall mail to the awardee
(by certified mail, return receipt
requested) a separate written notice in
addition to that required by § 600.24(a)
at least ten days prior to the effective
date of the suspension or termination.
Such notice shall include, as
appropriate:
(1) The factual and legal bases for the
suspension or termination;
(2) The effective date or dates of the
DOE action;
(3) If the action does not apply to the
entire award, a description of the
activities affected by the action;
(4) Instructions concerning which
costs shall be allowable during the
period of suspension, or instructions
concerning allowable termination costs,
including in either case, instructions
concerning any subgrants or contracts;
(5) Instructions concerning required
final reports and other closeout actions
for terminated awards (see §§ 600.170
through 600.173, §§ 600.250 through
600.252, and §§ 600.350 through
600.353);
(6) A statement of the awardee’s right
to appeal a termination for cause
pursuant to § 600.22; and
(7) The dated signature of a DOE
Contracting Officer.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 600.26
[Removed and Reserved]
22. Section 600.26 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 600.28
[Removed and Reserved]
23. Section 600.28 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 600.29
[Amended]
24. Section 600.29 is amended as
follows:
■ a. In paragraph (b)(1), ‘‘$100,000’’ is
removed and ‘‘$250,000’’ is added in its
place.
■ b. In paragraphs (b)(5) and (b)(6)
‘‘Contracting Officer’’ is capitalized.
■ 25. Section 600.30 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 600.30
Cost sharing.
In addition to the requirements of
§§ 600.123, 600.224, or 600.313, the
following requirements apply to
research, development, demonstration
and commercial application activities
projects:
(a) Cost sharing is required for most
financial assistance awards for research,
development, demonstration and
commercial applications activities
initiated after the enactment of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 on August 8,
2005. This requirement does not apply
to:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44277
(1) An award under the small
business innovation research program or
the small business technology transfer
program; or
(2) A program with cost sharing
requirements defined by other than
Section 988 of the Energy Policy Act of
2005 including other sections of the
2005 Act and the Energy Policy Act of
1992.
(b) A cost share of at least 20 percent
of the cost of the activity is required for
research and development except
where:
(1) A research or development activity
of a basic or fundamental nature has
been excluded by an appropriate officer
of the Department, generally an Under
Secretary; or
(2) The Secretary has determined it is
necessary and appropriate to reduce or
eliminate the cost sharing requirement
for a research and development activity
of an applied nature.
(c) A cost share of at least 50 percent
of the cost of a demonstration or
commercial application program or
activity is required unless the Secretary
has determined it is necessary and
appropriate to reduce the cost sharing
requirements, taking into consideration
any technological risk relating to the
activity.
(d) Cost share shall be provided by
non-Federal funds unless otherwise
authorized by statute. In calculating the
amount of the non-Federal contribution:
(1) Base the non-Federal contribution
on total project costs, including the cost
of work where funds are provided
directly to a partner, consortium
member or subrecipient, such as a
Federally Funded Research and
Development Center;
(2) Include the following costs as
allowable in accordance with the
applicable cost principles:
(i) Cash;
(ii) Personnel costs;
(iii) The value of a service, other
resource, or third party in-kind
contribution determined in accordance
with the applicable circular of the Office
of Management and Budget;
(iv) Indirect costs or facilities and
administrative costs; and/or
(v) Any funds received under the
power program of the Tennessee Valley
Authority (except to the extent that such
funds are made available under an
annual appropriation Act);
(3) Exclude the following costs:
(i) Revenues or royalties from the
prospective operation of an activity
beyond the time considered in the
award;
(ii) Proceeds from the prospective sale
of an asset of an activity; or
(iii) Other appropriated Federal funds.
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
44278
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 166 / Friday, August 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(iv) Repayment of the Federal share of
a cost-shared activity under Section 988
of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 shall
not be a condition of the award.
§ 600.31
26. Section 600.31 is amended as
follows:
■ a. In paragraph (c), the phrase
‘‘Contracting Officer’’ is capitalized in
all occurrences.
■ b. In paragraph (d), the phrase
‘‘Contracting Officer’’ is capitalized.
■ c. In paragraph (f)(5), the phrase
‘‘Contracting Officer’’ is capitalized.
■ 27. Section 600.112 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 600.112 Forms for applying for Federal
assistance.
(a) General. An application for an
award shall be on the form or in the
format specified in a program rule or in
the funding opportunity announcement.
When a version of the Standard Form
424 is not used, DOE shall indicate
whether the application is subject to
review by the State under Executive
Order 12372.
(b) Budgetary information. DOE may
request and the applicant shall submit
the minimum budgetary information
necessary to evaluate the costs of the
proposed project.
(c) DOE may, subsequent to receipt of
an application, request additional
information from an applicant when
necessary for clarification or to make
informed preaward determinations.
(d) Continuation and renewal
applications. DOE may require that an
application for a continuation or
renewal award be made in the format or
on the forms authorized by paragraphs
(a) and (b) of this section.
[Amended]
28. Section 600.113 is amended by
removing ‘‘10 CFR part 1036’’ and
adding ‘‘2 CFR 180 and 901’’ in its
place.
■
§ 600.117
[Removed and Reserved]
[Amended]
30. Section 600.305 is amended by
removing ‘‘10 CFR part 1036’’ and
adding ‘‘2 CFR 180 and 901’’ in its
place.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
■
31. Under the authority of 42 U.S.C.
7254, part 1024 is removed.
■
[FR Doc. E9–20299 Filed 8–27–09; 8:45 am]
16:25 Aug 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for the Alenia Model C–27J
airplane. This airplane will have novel
or unusual design features when
compared to the state of technology
described in the airworthiness standards
for transport-category airplanes. These
special conditions pertain to the effects
of novel or unusual design features such
as effects on the structural performance
of the airplane.
The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: September 28,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Holly Thorson, FAA, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1357, facsimile
(425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Type Certification Basis
PART 1024—[REMOVED]
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Special Conditions: Alenia Aeronautica
Model C–27J Airplane; Interaction of
Systems and Structures
On March 27, 2006, the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
forwarded to the FAA an application
from Alenia Aeronautica of Torino,
Italy, for U.S. type certification of a
twin-engine commercial transport
designated as the Alenia model C–27J.
The Alenia model C–27J is a twinturbopropeller, cargo-transport aircraft
with a maximum takeoff weight of
67,240 pounds.
29. Section 600.117 is removed and
reserved.
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
[Docket No. NM398; Special Conditions No.
25–390–SC]
Background
■
§ 600.305
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Amended]
■
§ 600.113
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Under the provisions of Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17
and the bilateral agreement between the
U.S. and Italy, Alenia Aeronautica must
show that the Alenia model C–27J meets
the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
25, as amended by Amendments 25–1
through 25–87. Alenia also elects to
comply with Amendment 25–122,
effective September 5, 2007, for
§ 25.1317.
If the Administrator finds that
existing airworthiness regulations do
not adequately or appropriately address
safety standards for the Alenia model
C–27J due to a novel or unusual design
feature, we prescribe special conditions
under provisions of § 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Alenia model C–27J
must comply with the fuel-vent and
exhaust-emission requirements of 14
CFR part 34 and the noise-certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36. In
addition, the FAA must issue a finding
of regulatory adequacy pursuant to § 611
of Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise
Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type-certification basis under
§ 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same or similar novel
or unusual design feature, the special
conditions also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Alenia model C–27J incorporates
several novel or unusual design
features. Because of rapid improvements
in airplane technology, the existing
airworthiness regulations do not
adequately or appropriately address
safety standards for these design
features. These special conditions for
the Alenia model C–27J contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
These special conditions were derived
initially from standardized requirements
developed by the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC),
comprised of representatives of the
FAA, Europe’s Joint Aviation
Authorities (JAA), now replaced by the
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), and industry. From the initial
proposal, the JAA proposed these
special conditions in Notice of Proposed
Amendment (NPA) 25C–199. When
Ente Nazionale per l’Aviazione Civile
(ENAC) certified the Alenia model
C–27J they applied NPA 25C–199,
issued July 3, 1997.
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 166 (Friday, August 28, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44273-44278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20299]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Parts 600 and 1024
RIN 1991-AB77
Assistance Regulations
AGENCY: Department of Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) amends its Financial Assistance
Regulations to update, streamline, and simplify the general rules. DOE
also removes regulations governing the DOE Financial Assistance Appeals
Board.
DATES: This rulemaking is effective September 28, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jacqueline Kniskern, Office of
Procurement and Assistance Policy, U.S. Department of Energy, at 202-
287-1342, or by e-mail at jacqueline.kniskern@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
K. Approval by the Office of the Secretary of Energy
I. Background
DOE has been actively engaged in the government-wide effort to
streamline and simplify the application, administrative and reporting
procedures for Federal financial assistance programs pursuant to the
Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act of 1999, Public
Law 106-107.
As part of this initiative, DOE has solicited comments and
suggestions from the grant community and made changes to its assistance
regulations. In particular, the DOE added to 10 CFR part 600 Subpart D,
Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements with
For-Profit Organizations, in a rule published in the Federal Register
at 68 FR 50645 on August 21, 2003.
DOE has also incorporated policy directives issued by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) that established a standard format for
Federal agency announcements of funding opportunities under programs
that award discretionary grants or cooperative agreements, established
standard data elements for electronically posting synopses of Federal
agencies' announcements of funding opportunities, and required Federal
agencies to post synopses of their discretionary grant and cooperative
agreement funding opportunity announcements on the Grants.gov Web site,
https://www.Grants.gov. The final rule incorporating these policy
directives was published in the Federal Register at 69 FR 7865 on
February 20, 2004. In addition, DOE developed a standard format for its
funding opportunity announcements and revised systems to comply with
the new posting requirements.
On May 16, 2008, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) was
published in the Federal Register (73 FR 28385) that detailed changes
to update, streamline and simplify the general rules in 10 CFR 600,
Subpart A of its Financial Assistance Rules. The NOPR also proposed to
remove the regulations at 10 CFR part 1024 governing the DOE Financial
Assistance Appeals Board. This Board was abolished when DOE's Energy
Board of Contract Appeals was merged into the Civilian Board of
Contract Appeals as required by Section 847 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, Public Law 109-163.
DOE received no comments from members of the public in response to
the NOPR. Nevertheless, DOE made the following technical changes to the
text of the rule.
1. Section 600.5(d) is revised to add a reference to Section
600.352 after 600.162 and 600.243.
2. Section 600.7(c) is revised to show the referenced Sections to
be 600.144, 60.236 and 600.331.
3. Section 600.25(a)(2) is revised to correct the modifying ``An''
to ``A''.
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
This regulatory action has been determined not to be ``a
significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
Accordingly, this action is not subject to review under that Executive
Order by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Review Under Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule
that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency
certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant
[[Page 44274]]
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As required
by Executive Order 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking'' (67 FR 53461, August 16, 2002), DOE published
policies and procedures to ensure that the potential impacts of its
draft rules on small entities are properly considered during the
rulemaking process (68 FR 7990, February 19, 2003), and has made them
available on the Office of General Counsel's Web site: https://www.gc.doe.gov. DOE has reviewed today's rule under the provisions of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the procedures and policies
published on February 19, 2003. Today's final rule subjects small
entities either to requirements that parallel government-wide
requirements that OMB Circular A-110 establishes for other assistance
awards, or to less burdensome requirements that enable firms from the
commercial marketplace to participate in DOE research, development, and
demonstration projects. Today's proposed amendments would not alter the
substance of the OMB requirements or impose significant additional
burdens. On the basis of the foregoing, DOE certifies that this rule
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. DOE did not prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
for this rulemaking.
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This regulatory action will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements subject to approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act
DOE has concluded that promulgation of this rule falls into a class
of actions that would not individually or cumulatively have a
significant impact on the human environment, as determined by DOE's
regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Specifically, this rule establishes
guidelines and procedures for application and review, administration,
audit and closeout of assistance instruments, and, therefore, is
covered under the Categorical Exclusion in paragraph A6 of Appendix A
to Subpart D, 10 CFR Part 1021. Accordingly, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, 64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999), imposes
certain requirements on agencies formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt State law or that have federalism
implications. Agencies are required to examine the constitutional and
statutory authority supporting any action that would limit the
policymaking discretion of the States and carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. DOE has examined today's rule and has
determined that it does not preempt state law and does not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. No further
action is required by Executive Order 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
``Civil Justice Reform,'' 61 FR 4729, (February 7, 1996), imposes on
executive agencies the general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard
for affected conduct rather than a general standard; and (4) promote
simplification and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive Order
12988 specifically requires that executive agencies make every
reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies
the preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on
existing Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard
for affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden
reduction; (4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting
clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the
United States Attorney General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988
requires executive agencies to review regulations in light of
applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine whether
they are met or if it is unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE
has completed the required review and determined that, to the extent
permitted by law, this rule meets the relevant standards of Executive
Order 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) generally
requires Federal agencies to examine closely the impacts of regulatory
actions on State, local, tribal governments. Subsection 101(5) of title
I of that law defines a Federal intergovernmental mandate to include a
regulation that would impose upon State, local, or tribal governments
an enforceable duty, except a condition of Federal assistance or a duty
arising from participating in a voluntary Federal program. Title II of
that law requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or the private sector, other than to the extent such actions
merely incorporate requirements specifically set forth in a statute.
Section 202 of the title requires a Federal agency to perform a
detailed assessment of the anticipated costs and benefits of any rule
that includes a Federal mandate which may result in costs to State,
local, or tribal governments, or the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year (adjusted annually for inflation). 2 U.S.C.
1532(a) and (b). Section 204 of that title requires each agency that
proposed a rule containing a significant Federal intergovernmental
mandate to develop an effective process for obtaining meaningful and
timely input from elected officers of State, local, and tribal
governments. 2 U.S.C. 1534.
This rule amends the assistance regulations to streamline and
simplify procedures for soliciting, awarding, and administering
financial assistance agreements. The rule does not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in aggregate, or
by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year.
Accordingly, no assessment or analysis is required under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any proposed rule or policy that may affect
family well-being. This rule will not have any impact on the autonomy
or integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a Family Policy
Assessment.
[[Page 44275]]
I. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001, 44
U.S.C. 3516 note, provides for agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under implementing guidelines established
by each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by OMB. OMB's
guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE's
guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today's rule under the OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in those
guidelines.
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to the
OMB a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed significant energy
action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy; or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected
benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use.
This regulatory action would not have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of energy and is therefore not a
significant energy action. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
Statement of Energy Effects.
K. Approval by the Office of the Secretary of Energy
The Office of the Secretary has approved the issuance of this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Parts 600 and 1024
Administrative practice and procedure, Assistance programs.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2009.
Edward R. Simpson,
Director, Office of Procurement and Supply Management, Office of
Management, Department of Energy.
Barbara H. Stearrett,
Acting Director, Office of Acquisition and Assistance Management,
National Nuclear Security Administration.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, Part 600 of Chapter II, and
Part 1024 of Chapter X, Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
are amended as follows:
PART 600--FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE RULES
0
1. The authority citation for part 600 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 31 U.S.C. 6301-6308; 50
U.S.C. 2401 et seq., unless otherwise noted.
Sec. 600.2 [Amended]
0
2. Section 600.2 is amended in paragraph (a) by removing
``solicitations'' and adding ``funding opportunity announcement'' in
its place.
0
3. Section 600.3 is amended in the definition of ``Amendment'' by
capitalizing ``Contracting Officer'', and by adding new definitions in
alphabetical order for ``Cost sharing or matching'' and ``Total Project
Cost'' to read as follows:
Sec. 600.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
Cost sharing or matching means that portion of project or programs
costs not borne by the Federal Government.
* * * * *
Total Project Cost means all allowable costs, as set forth in the
applicable Federal cost principles, incurred in accomplishing the
objective of the project during the project period, including the value
of contributions made by third parties and costs incurred by Federally
Funded Research and Development Centers.
0
4. Section 600.4 paragraph (a)(1) is amended by revising the second
sentence to read as follows:
Sec. 600.4 Deviations.
(a) General. (1) * * * The use of optional or discretionary
provisions of this part, including special restrictive conditions used
in accordance with Sec. Sec. 600.114, 600.212, and 600.304 are not
deviations. * * *
* * * * *
Sec. 600.5 Selection of Award Instrument.
0
5. Section 600.5, paragraph (d) is amended by removing ``Sec. Sec.
600.162 and 600.243'' and adding in its place ``Sec. Sec. 600.162,
600.243 and 600.352''.
0
6. Section 600.6 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 600.6 Eligibility.
(a) General. DOE shall solicit applications for financial
assistance in a manner which provides for the maximum amount of
competition feasible.
(b) Restricted eligibility. If DOE restricts eligibility, an
explanation of why the restriction of eligibility is considered
necessary shall be included in the funding opportunity announcement,
program rule, or published notice.
(1) If the aggregate amount of DOE funds available for award under
a funding opportunity announcement or published notice is $1million or
more, unless authorized by statute or program rule, such restriction of
eligibility shall be:
(i) Supported by a written determination initiated by the program
office;
(ii) Concurred in by legal counsel and the Contracting Officer; and
(iii) Approved by an official no less than one level below the
responsible program Assistant Secretary, Deputy Administrator, or other
official of equivalent authority.
(2) Where the amount of DOE funds is less than $1 million, the
cognizant HCA and the Contracting Officer may approve the
determination.
(c) Noncompetitive financial assistance. DOE may award a grant or
cooperative agreement on a noncompetitive basis only if the application
satisfies one or more of the following selection criteria:
(1) The activity to be funded is necessary to the satisfactory
completion of, or is a continuation or renewal of, an activity
presently being funded by DOE or another Federal agency, and for which
competition for support would have a significant adverse effect on
continuity or completion of the activity.
(2) The activity is being or would be conducted by the applicant
using its own resources or those donated or provided by third parties;
however, DOE support of that activity would enhance the public benefits
to be derived and DOE knows of no other entity which is conducting or
is planning to conduct such an activity.
(3) The applicant is a unit of government and the activity to be
supported is related to performance of a governmental function within
the subject jurisdiction, thereby precluding DOE provision of support
to another entity.
[[Page 44276]]
(4) The applicant has exclusive domestic capability to perform the
activity successfully, based upon unique equipment, proprietary data,
technical expertise, or other such unique qualifications.
(5) The award implements an agreement between the United States
Government and a foreign government to fund a foreign applicant.
(6) Time constraints associated with a public health, safety,
welfare or national security requirement preclude competition.
(7) The proposed project was submitted as an unsolicited proposal
and represents a unique or innovative idea, method, or approach that
would not be eligible for financial assistance under a recent, current,
or planned funding opportunity announcement, and if, as determined by
DOE, a competitive funding opportunity announcement would not be
appropriate.
(8) The responsible program Assistant Secretary, Deputy
Administrator, or other official of equivalent authority determines
that a noncompetitive award is in the public interest. This authority
may not be delegated.
(d) Approval requirements. (1) Where the amount of DOE funds is $1
million or greater, determinations of noncompetitive awards shall be:
(i) Documented in writing;
(ii) Concurred in by the responsible program technical official and
local legal counsel; and
(iii) Approved, prior to award, by the responsible program
Assistant Secretary, Deputy Administrator, or official of equivalent
authority and the Contracting Officer. The approval authority may be
delegated to one organizational level below the Assistant Secretary,
Deputy Administrator, or official of equivalent authority.
(2) Where the amount of DOE funds is less than $1 million,
determinations of noncompetitive awards shall be:
(i) Documented in writing;
(ii) Concurred in by local legal counsel, unless for a particular
award or class of awards of $1 million or less, review is waived by
legal counsel; and
(iii) Approved by the cognizant HCA and the Contracting Officer.
Sec. 600.7 [Amended]
0
7. Section 600.7, paragraph (c) is amended by removing ``Section
600.111 or Section 600.236'' and adding in its place ``Sec. Sec.
600.144, 600.236 and 600.331''.
0
8. Section 600.8 is amended as follows:
0
a. The section title is revised as set forth below.
0
b. In paragraph (a) introductory text, the first sentence is amended by
removing ``Program announcement'' and adding ``Funding Opportunity
Announcements (FOA)'' in its place.
0
c. In paragraph (a)(1), the last sentence is amended by removing
``Solicitations'' and adding ``FOAs'' in its place.
0
d. In paragraph (a)(2) introductory text, the first sentence is amended
by removing ``program announcements'' and adding ``FOAs'' in its place.
Sec. 600.8 Funding Opportunity Announcement.
* * * * *
0
9. Section 600.10 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (b), the first sentence is amended by removing ``and in
the number of copies''.
0
b. In paragraph (c)(1), the second sentence is amended by removing ``or
other approved DOE application form''.
0
c. Paragraph (c)(4) is removed.
0
d. A new paragraph (f) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 600.10 Form and content of applications,
* * * * *
(f) Registration is required in the Central Contractor Registration
(CCR) for all applications. Information on registration can be obtained
at https://www.ccr.gov/Grantees.aspx.
Sec. Sec. 600.11 and 600.12 [Removed and Reserved]
0
10. Sections 600.11 and 600.12 are removed and reserved.
Sec. 600.14 [Reserved]
0
11. Section 600.14 is added and reserved.
Sec. 600.15 [Amended]
0
12. Section 600.15, paragraph (b)(2) is amended by removing
``solicitation'' and adding ``funding opportunity announcement'' in its
place.
0
13. Section 600.16, is amended by redesignating paragraph (b) as
paragraph (c), and by adding a new paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 600.16 Legal authority and effect of an award.
* * * * *
(b) Recipients are free to accept or reject the award. A request to
draw down DOE funds constitutes acceptance; however, DOE may require
formal acceptance of an award.
* * * * *
0
14. Section 600.17 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 600.17 Contents of Award.
Each financial assistance award shall be made on a Notice of
Financial Assistance Award (NFAA) which contains basic identifying and
funding information. The NFAA provides the contents of the award
including any special terms and conditions, program regulations, the
National Policy Assurances, and any other provisions necessary to
establish the respective rights, duties, obligations, and
responsibilities of DOE and the recipient, consistent with the
requirements of this part.
Sec. 600.18 [Removed and Reserved]
0
15. Section 600.18 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 600.19 [Amended]
0
16. Section 600.19 is amended by removing, in the second sentence,
``briefly'' and ``and, if for grounds other than unavailability of
funds, shall offer the unsuccessful applicant the opportunity for a
more detailed explanation upon request''.
Sec. 600.21 [Amended]
0
17. Section 600.21, paragraph (a) is amended by removing ``Sec. Sec.
600.153 and 600.242'' and adding in its place ``Sec. Sec. 600.153,
600.242 and 600.342''.
0
18. Section 600.22 is amended as follows:
0
a. In the last sentence of paragraph (a), the words ``available in 10
CFR Part 1024'' are removed.
0
b. Paragraphs (d) and (f)(1) are revised.
0
c. Paragraph (e) is amended by removing ``Board'' and adding ``SPE'' in
its place, for every occurrence.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 600.22 Disputes and appeals.
* * * * *
(d) Right of appeal. Except as provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section, the final determination under paragraph (c) of this section
may be appealed to the cognizant Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) for
either DOE or the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). The
mailing address for the DOE SPE is Office of Procurement and Assistance
Management, 1000 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20585. The
mailing address for the NNSA SPE is Office of Acquisition and Supply
Management, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585.
* * * * *
(f) Review on appeal. (1) The SPE shall have no jurisdiction to
review
(i) Any preaward dispute (except as provided in paragraph
(f)(2)(ii) of this section), including use of any special restrictive
condition pursuant to Sec. Sec. 600.114, 600.212, or 600.304;
[[Page 44277]]
(ii) DOE denial of a request for a deviation under Sec. Sec.
600.4, 600.103, 600.205, or 600.303 of this part;
(iii) DOE denial of a request for a budget revision or other change
in the approved project under Sec. Sec. 600.125, 600.127, 600.222,
600.230, 600.315, or 600.317 of this part or under another term or
condition of the award;
(iv) Any DOE action authorized under Sec. Sec. 600.162(a)(1), (2),
(3) or (5), 600.243(a)(1), (a)(3), or 600.352(a)(1), (2), (3) or (5)
for suspensions only; or Sec. Sec. 600.162(a)(4), 600.243(a)(4) or
600.352(a)(4) for actions disapproving renewal applications or other
requests for extension of time or additional funding for the same
project when related to recipient noncompliance, or such actions
authorized by program rule;
(v) Any DOE decision about an action requiring prior DOE approval
under Sec. Sec. 600.144, 600.236, or 600.331 of this part or under
another term or condition of the award;
* * * * *
Sec. 600.23 [Removed and Reserved]
0
19. Section 600.23 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 600.24 [Amended]
0
20. Section 600.24 is amended in paragraphs (a)(3) and (b) introductory
text by removing ``or Sec. 600.243(a)'' and adding ``Sec. Sec.
600.243(a), 600.312(g), or 600.352(a)'' in its place.
0
21. Section 600.25 is amended in:
0
a. Paragraph (a)(1) by removing ``or Sec. 600.243(a)'' and adding
``Sec. Sec. 600.243(a) or 600.352(a)'' in its place.
0
b. Paragraph (a)(2) by removing ``An'' and adding ``A'' in its place
and by removing ``Sec. 600.23'' and adding ``2 CFR 180 and 901'' in
its place.
0
c. Paragraph (b) is revised.
0
d. Paragraph (b)(5) by removing ``and Sec. Sec. 600.250 through
600.252'' and adding ``Sec. Sec. 600.250 through 600.252 and
Sec. Sec. 600.350 through 600.353'' in its place.
0
e. Paragraph (d) by removing ``or Sec. Sec. 600.243 through 600.244''
and adding ``Sec. Sec. 600.243 through 600.244 or Sec. Sec. 600.350
through 600.353'' in its place.
0
f. Paragraph (f) by removing ``or Sec. Sec. 600.243 through 600.244''
and adding ``Sec. Sec. 600.243 through 600.244 or Sec. Sec. 600.350
through 600.353'' in its place.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 600.25 Suspension and termination.
* * * * *
(b) Notification requirements. Except as provided in Sec. Sec.
600.24, 600.162(a), 600.243(a), or 600.352(a) before suspending or
terminating an award for cause, DOE shall mail to the awardee (by
certified mail, return receipt requested) a separate written notice in
addition to that required by Sec. 600.24(a) at least ten days prior to
the effective date of the suspension or termination. Such notice shall
include, as appropriate:
(1) The factual and legal bases for the suspension or termination;
(2) The effective date or dates of the DOE action;
(3) If the action does not apply to the entire award, a description
of the activities affected by the action;
(4) Instructions concerning which costs shall be allowable during
the period of suspension, or instructions concerning allowable
termination costs, including in either case, instructions concerning
any subgrants or contracts;
(5) Instructions concerning required final reports and other
closeout actions for terminated awards (see Sec. Sec. 600.170 through
600.173, Sec. Sec. 600.250 through 600.252, and Sec. Sec. 600.350
through 600.353);
(6) A statement of the awardee's right to appeal a termination for
cause pursuant to Sec. 600.22; and
(7) The dated signature of a DOE Contracting Officer.
* * * * *
Sec. 600.26 [Removed and Reserved]
0
22. Section 600.26 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 600.28 [Removed and Reserved]
0
23. Section 600.28 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 600.29 [Amended]
0
24. Section 600.29 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (b)(1), ``$100,000'' is removed and ``$250,000'' is
added in its place.
0
b. In paragraphs (b)(5) and (b)(6) ``Contracting Officer'' is
capitalized.
0
25. Section 600.30 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 600.30 Cost sharing.
In addition to the requirements of Sec. Sec. 600.123, 600.224, or
600.313, the following requirements apply to research, development,
demonstration and commercial application activities projects:
(a) Cost sharing is required for most financial assistance awards
for research, development, demonstration and commercial applications
activities initiated after the enactment of the Energy Policy Act of
2005 on August 8, 2005. This requirement does not apply to:
(1) An award under the small business innovation research program
or the small business technology transfer program; or
(2) A program with cost sharing requirements defined by other than
Section 988 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 including other sections
of the 2005 Act and the Energy Policy Act of 1992.
(b) A cost share of at least 20 percent of the cost of the activity
is required for research and development except where:
(1) A research or development activity of a basic or fundamental
nature has been excluded by an appropriate officer of the Department,
generally an Under Secretary; or
(2) The Secretary has determined it is necessary and appropriate to
reduce or eliminate the cost sharing requirement for a research and
development activity of an applied nature.
(c) A cost share of at least 50 percent of the cost of a
demonstration or commercial application program or activity is required
unless the Secretary has determined it is necessary and appropriate to
reduce the cost sharing requirements, taking into consideration any
technological risk relating to the activity.
(d) Cost share shall be provided by non-Federal funds unless
otherwise authorized by statute. In calculating the amount of the non-
Federal contribution:
(1) Base the non-Federal contribution on total project costs,
including the cost of work where funds are provided directly to a
partner, consortium member or subrecipient, such as a Federally Funded
Research and Development Center;
(2) Include the following costs as allowable in accordance with the
applicable cost principles:
(i) Cash;
(ii) Personnel costs;
(iii) The value of a service, other resource, or third party in-
kind contribution determined in accordance with the applicable circular
of the Office of Management and Budget;
(iv) Indirect costs or facilities and administrative costs; and/or
(v) Any funds received under the power program of the Tennessee
Valley Authority (except to the extent that such funds are made
available under an annual appropriation Act);
(3) Exclude the following costs:
(i) Revenues or royalties from the prospective operation of an
activity beyond the time considered in the award;
(ii) Proceeds from the prospective sale of an asset of an activity;
or
(iii) Other appropriated Federal funds.
[[Page 44278]]
(iv) Repayment of the Federal share of a cost-shared activity under
Section 988 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 shall not be a condition
of the award.
Sec. 600.31 [Amended]
0
26. Section 600.31 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (c), the phrase ``Contracting Officer'' is capitalized
in all occurrences.
0
b. In paragraph (d), the phrase ``Contracting Officer'' is capitalized.
0
c. In paragraph (f)(5), the phrase ``Contracting Officer'' is
capitalized.
0
27. Section 600.112 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 600.112 Forms for applying for Federal assistance.
(a) General. An application for an award shall be on the form or in
the format specified in a program rule or in the funding opportunity
announcement. When a version of the Standard Form 424 is not used, DOE
shall indicate whether the application is subject to review by the
State under Executive Order 12372.
(b) Budgetary information. DOE may request and the applicant shall
submit the minimum budgetary information necessary to evaluate the
costs of the proposed project.
(c) DOE may, subsequent to receipt of an application, request
additional information from an applicant when necessary for
clarification or to make informed preaward determinations.
(d) Continuation and renewal applications. DOE may require that an
application for a continuation or renewal award be made in the format
or on the forms authorized by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
Sec. 600.113 [Amended]
0
28. Section 600.113 is amended by removing ``10 CFR part 1036'' and
adding ``2 CFR 180 and 901'' in its place.
Sec. 600.117 [Removed and Reserved]
0
29. Section 600.117 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 600.305 [Amended]
0
30. Section 600.305 is amended by removing ``10 CFR part 1036'' and
adding ``2 CFR 180 and 901'' in its place.
PART 1024--[REMOVED]
0
31. Under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 7254, part 1024 is removed.
[FR Doc. E9-20299 Filed 8-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P