Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit, 43698-43700 [E9-20731]
Download as PDF
43698
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 165 / Thursday, August 27, 2009 / Notices
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305–5805.
In accordance with section 3(c)(2) of
FIFRA, a copy of the approved label, the
list of data references, the data and other
scientific information used to support
registration, except for material
specifically protected by section 10 of
FIFRA, are also available for public
inspection. Requests for data must be
made in accordance with the provisions
of the Freedom of Information Act and
must be addressed to the Freedom of
Information Office (A–101), 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. Such requests should:
Identify the product name and
registration number and specify the data
or information desired.
A paper copy of the fact sheet, which
provides more detail on this
registration, may be obtained from the
National Technical Information Service
(NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Rd.,
Springfield, VA 22161.
2. Electronic access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.
II. Did EPA Approve the Application?
The Agency approved the application
after considering all required data on
risks associated with the proposed use
of Candida oleophila Strain O, and
information on social, economic, and
environmental benefits to be derived
from use. Specifically, the Agency has
considered the nature of the chemical
and its pattern of use, application
methods and rates, and level and extent
of potential exposure. Based on these
reviews, the Agency was able to make
basic health and safety determinations
which show that Candida oleophila
Strain O, when used in accordance with
widespread and commonly recognized
practice, will not generally cause
unreasonable adverse effects to human
health or the environment.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
III. Approved Application
EPA issued a notice, published in the
Federal Register of March 28, 2008 (73
FR 16676) (FRL–8355–5), which
announced that SynTech Global, LLC,
P.O. Box 640, Hockessin, DE 19707 on
behalf of BioNext sprl, Passage des
´
´
deportes, 2, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium,
had submitted an application to register
the pesticide product, NEXY,
biofungicide (EPA File Symbol 84863–
R), containing Candida oleophila Strain
O at 57%. This product was not
previously registered.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:19 Aug 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
The Agency received one public
comment in response to the March 28,
2008 notice. A private citizen expressed
opposition to Candida oleophila Strain
O’s introduction into the United States
in light of the ‘‘thousands of chemicals
already out there’’ and implied a
concern about the effects of ‘‘toxic
chemicals’’ on human health or the
environment. Pursuant to its authority
under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), the Agency conducted a
rigorous assessment of Candida
oleophila Strain O, as described in Unit
II, and concluded that it is not expected
to cause any unreasonable adverse
effects to human health or the
environment.
Further, Candida oleophila Strain O
is not considered a conventional
pesticide. Conventional pesticides
generally consist of synthetic materials,
may affect a broad spectrum of nontarget organisms, and may be inherently
more toxic. Candida oleophila Strain O,
however, is a naturally occurring yeast
isolated from golden delicious apples
and found on various food commodities,
and has been classified as a microbial
pesticide. Candida oleophila Strain O is
intended for use as an antagonist to
specifically control the fungal pathogens
gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) and blue
mold (Penicillium expansum), which
cause post-harvest decay on apples and
pears. The mode of action for Candida
oleophila Strain O is primarily through
competition for nutrients and precolonization of plant wound sites, and
use of Candida oleophila Strain O may
result in decreased conventional
pesticide applications to apples pears
after harvest. Additional information
about Candida oleophila Strain O and
the Agency’s assessment of this
microbial active ingredient can be found
in the Biopesticides Registration Action
Document (BRAD) on the Biopesticides
and Pollution Prevention Division
(BPPD) website: https://www.epa.gov/
pesticides/biopesticides.
The application was approved on
June 1, 2009, as NEXY (EPA Registration
Number 84863–1) for post-harvest
control of gray mold (Botrytis cinerea)
and blue mold (Penicillium expansum)
on apples and pears.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Pests and pesticides.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: August 18, 2009.
Sheryl K. Reilly,
Acting Director, Biopesticides and Pollution
Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. E9–20717 Filed 8–26–09; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8950–5]
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air
Act Citizen Suit
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed consent
decree; request for public comment.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended
(‘‘CAA’’ or ‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g),
notice is hereby given of a proposed
consent decree, to address a lawsuit
filed by Sierra Club in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of
Kentucky: Sierra Club v. Johnson, No.
2:09–CV–00085–WOB (E. D. KY). On
September 5, 2008, Sierra Club filed suit
to compel the Administrator to issue or
deny the CAA title V operating permit
for the Hugh L. Spurlock Generating
Station (Spurlock Station), operated by
the East Kentucky Power Cooperative,
Inc. Sierra Club later amended the
complaint to include a claim to compel
the Administrator to respond to a
petition dated April 28, 2008, seeking
EPA’s objection to a revised CAA title
V operating permit issued by the
Kentucky Division of Air Quality
(KDAQ) for the Spurlock Station. Under
the terms of the proposed consent
decree, EPA has agreed to respond to
the third claim contained in Sierra
Club’s petition (regarding MACT
determinations) by no later than
September 21, 2009, and to respond to
the remaining claims contained in the
petition by no later than November 30,
2009. The consent decree allows Sierra
Club sixty (60) days following entry of
the decree by the Court to file a motion
for costs of litigation (including
attorneys’ fees).
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed consent decree must be
received by September 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OGC–2009–0657, online at https://
www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred
method); by e-mail to
oei.docket@epa.gov; mailed to EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T,
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 165 / Thursday, August 27, 2009 / Notices
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by
hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. Comments on a disk or CD–
ROM should be formatted in Word or
ASCII file, avoiding the use of special
characters and any form of encryption,
and may be mailed to the mailing
address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristi Smith, Air and Radiation Law
Office (2344A), Office of General
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202)
564–3068; fax number (202) 564–5603;
e-mail address: smith.kristi@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
I. Additional Information About the
Proposed Consent Decree
On August 30, 2008, pursuant to CAA
section 505(b)(2), EPA issued an order
objecting, in part, to the CAA title V
operating permit issued by KDAQ for
the Spurlock Station. On September 5,
2008, Sierra Club filed suit to compel
the Administrator to issue or deny the
CAA title V operating permit for the
Spurlock Station, arguing that the
Administrator had a non-discretionary
duty to issue or deny the permit under
CAA section 505(c). Sierra Club also
sought, in the alternative, an order
declaring that the Administrator was
unreasonably delayed in taking action to
issue or deny the permit. Prior to filing
that case, on April 28, 2008, Sierra Club
had submitted a petition to the
Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency pursuant to CAA
section 505(b)(2), requesting that she
object to the issuance of a revised title
V operating permit by KDAQ for the
Spurlock Station. Sierra Club has
amended its complaint in the pending
lawsuit to include a claim to compel the
Administrator to respond to that
petition.
Under the terms of the proposed
consent decree, EPA shall grant or deny
an objection based on the third claim in
Sierra Club’s petition (regarding MACT
determinations for mercury and other
hazardous air pollutants) by no later
than September 21, 2009, and shall
grant or deny an objection based on the
petition’s remaining claims by no later
than November 30, 2009. The consent
decree allows Sierra Club sixty (60) days
following entry of the decree by the
Court to file a motion for costs of
litigation (including attorneys’ fees).
The consent decree becomes an order of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:19 Aug 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
the Court upon entry, and, consistent
with the terms of the consent decree, the
case shall be dismissed with prejudice
after EPA has fulfilled its obligations
and Sierra Club’s claims for litigation
costs have been resolved.
For a period of thirty (30) days
following the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will receive written
comments relating to the proposed
consent decree from persons who were
not named as parties or intervenors to
the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withdraw or
withhold consent to the proposed
consent decree if the comments disclose
facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate,
improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless
EPA or the Department of Justice
determines, based on any comment
which may be submitted, that consent to
the consent decree should be
withdrawn, the terms of the decree will
be affirmed.
II. Additional Information About
Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree
A. How Can I Get A Copy Of the
Consent Decree?
The official public docket for this
action (identified by Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OGC–2009–0657) contains a
copy of the proposed consent decree.
The official public docket is available
for public viewing at the Office of
Environmental Information (OEI) Docket
in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OEI
Docket is (202) 566–1752.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through https://
www.regulations.gov. You may use the
https://www.regulations.gov to submit or
view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. Once in the
system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in the
appropriate docket identification
number.
It is important to note that EPA’s
policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing online at https://
www.regulations.gov without change,
unless the comment contains
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43699
copyrighted material, CBI, or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute
is not included in the official public
docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted
material, including copyrighted material
contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. Although not all docket
materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any
of the publicly available docket
materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and To Whom Do I Submit
Comments?
You may submit comments as
provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an e-mail
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. This
ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Use of the https://www.regulations.gov
Web site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA’s preferred method
for receiving comments. The electronic
public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, e-mail address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA’s electronic public
docket, EPA’s electronic mail (e-mail)
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to the Docket without going
through https://www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address is automatically
captured and included as part of the
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
43700
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 165 / Thursday, August 27, 2009 / Notices
comment that is placed in the official
public docket, and made available in
EPA’s electronic public docket.
Dated: August 21, 2009.
Richard B. Ossias,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9–20731 Filed 8–26–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
registrations where the 180–day
comment period has been waived.
Users of these products who desire
continued use on crops or sites being
deleted should contact the applicable
registrant on or before February 23, 2010
or September 28, 2009 for registrations
for which the registrant requested a
waiver of the 180–day comment period.
Submit your withdrawal
request, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2009–0619, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http//
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket
Facility’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
ADDRESSES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0619; FRL–8432–4]
Notice of Receipt of Requests for
Amendments to Delete Uses in Certain
Pesticide Registrations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
6(f)(1) of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), as amended, EPA is issuing a
notice of receipt of request for
amendments by registrants to delete
uses in certain pesticide registrations.
Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA provides that a
registrant of a pesticide product may at
any time request that any of its pesticide
registrations be amended to delete one
or more uses. FIFRA further provides
that, before acting on the request, EPA
must publish a notice of receipt of any
request in the Federal Register.
DATES: The deletions are effective by
February 23, 2010 or September 28,
2009 for registrations for which the
registrant requested a waiver of the 180–
day comment period. The Agency will
consider withdrawal requests
postmarked no later than February 23,
2010 or September 28, 2009, whichever
is applicable. Comments must be
received on or before February 23, 2010
or September 28, 2009, for those
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Jamula, Information Technology and
Resources Management Division
(7502P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–6426; e-mail address:
jamula.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. Although this action may be
of particular interest to persons who
produce or use pesticides, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the
specific entities that may be affected by
this action. If you have any questions
regarding the information in this notice,
consult the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this
Document and Other Related
Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0619.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket
at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the Office of
Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory
Public Docket in Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305–5805.
2. Electronic access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.
II. What Action is the Agency Taking?
This notice announces receipt by the
Agency of applications from registrants
to delete uses in certain pesticide
registrations. These registrations are
listed in Table 1 of this unit by
registration number, product name,
active ingredient, and specific uses
deleted:
TABLE 1.—REGISTRATIONS WITH REQUESTS FOR AMENDMENTS TO DELETE USES IN CERTAIN PESTICIDES
EPA Reg. No.
Product Name
Active Ingredient
Delete From Label
Protect DF
Mancozeb
Athletic Fields, Residential Lawns
and Turf, and Pachysandra
009198–00196
Fertilizer with TGR Poa Annua
Control
Paclobutrazol
Home/Residential Lawns
009198–00199
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
001001–00077
TGR
Winter
Enhancer
overseeding
Paclobutrazol
Home/Residential Lawns
009198–00205
Anderson’s Golf Products Turf
Enhancer 2SC
Paclobutrazol
Home/Residential Lawns
009198–00215
The Anderson’s Fertilizer
0.25% Paclobutrazol
Paclobutrazol
Home/Residential Lawns
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:19 Aug 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
with
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 165 (Thursday, August 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43698-43700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20731]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8950-5]
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed consent decree; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``CAA'' or ``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given
of a proposed consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Sierra Club
in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky: Sierra
Club v. Johnson, No. 2:09-CV-00085-WOB (E. D. KY). On September 5,
2008, Sierra Club filed suit to compel the Administrator to issue or
deny the CAA title V operating permit for the Hugh L. Spurlock
Generating Station (Spurlock Station), operated by the East Kentucky
Power Cooperative, Inc. Sierra Club later amended the complaint to
include a claim to compel the Administrator to respond to a petition
dated April 28, 2008, seeking EPA's objection to a revised CAA title V
operating permit issued by the Kentucky Division of Air Quality (KDAQ)
for the Spurlock Station. Under the terms of the proposed consent
decree, EPA has agreed to respond to the third claim contained in
Sierra Club's petition (regarding MACT determinations) by no later than
September 21, 2009, and to respond to the remaining claims contained in
the petition by no later than November 30, 2009. The consent decree
allows Sierra Club sixty (60) days following entry of the decree by the
Court to file a motion for costs of litigation (including attorneys'
fees).
DATES: Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received
by September 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2009-0657, online at https://www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred
method); by e-mail to oei.docket@epa.gov; mailed to EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T,
[[Page 43699]]
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand
delivery or courier to EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or
CD-ROM should be formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of
special characters and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the
mailing address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristi Smith, Air and Radiation Law
Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone: (202) 564-3068; fax number (202) 564-5603; e-mail address:
smith.kristi@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the Proposed Consent Decree
On August 30, 2008, pursuant to CAA section 505(b)(2), EPA issued
an order objecting, in part, to the CAA title V operating permit issued
by KDAQ for the Spurlock Station. On September 5, 2008, Sierra Club
filed suit to compel the Administrator to issue or deny the CAA title V
operating permit for the Spurlock Station, arguing that the
Administrator had a non-discretionary duty to issue or deny the permit
under CAA section 505(c). Sierra Club also sought, in the alternative,
an order declaring that the Administrator was unreasonably delayed in
taking action to issue or deny the permit. Prior to filing that case,
on April 28, 2008, Sierra Club had submitted a petition to the
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to CAA
section 505(b)(2), requesting that she object to the issuance of a
revised title V operating permit by KDAQ for the Spurlock Station.
Sierra Club has amended its complaint in the pending lawsuit to include
a claim to compel the Administrator to respond to that petition.
Under the terms of the proposed consent decree, EPA shall grant or
deny an objection based on the third claim in Sierra Club's petition
(regarding MACT determinations for mercury and other hazardous air
pollutants) by no later than September 21, 2009, and shall grant or
deny an objection based on the petition's remaining claims by no later
than November 30, 2009. The consent decree allows Sierra Club sixty
(60) days following entry of the decree by the Court to file a motion
for costs of litigation (including attorneys' fees). The consent decree
becomes an order of the Court upon entry, and, consistent with the
terms of the consent decree, the case shall be dismissed with prejudice
after EPA has fulfilled its obligations and Sierra Club's claims for
litigation costs have been resolved.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to
the proposed consent decree from persons who were not named as parties
or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of
Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed consent decree
if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of
Justice determines, based on any comment which may be submitted, that
consent to the consent decree should be withdrawn, the terms of the
decree will be affirmed.
II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree
A. How Can I Get A Copy Of the Consent Decree?
The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2009-0657) contains a copy of the proposed consent
decree. The official public docket is available for public viewing at
the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the
telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-1752.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
https://www.regulations.gov. You may use the https://www.regulations.gov
to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the
contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents
in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``search,'' then key in the appropriate docket
identification number.
It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at https://www.regulations.gov without change,
unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute is not included in the official public docket or in the
electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material,
including copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only
in printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an e-mail address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or
CD-ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Use of the https://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments
to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments.
The electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(e-mail) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to the Docket without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address is automatically captured and
included as part of the
[[Page 43700]]
comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made
available in EPA's electronic public docket.
Dated: August 21, 2009.
Richard B. Ossias,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-20731 Filed 8-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P