Patient Safety and Quality Improvement: Civil Money Penalty Inflation Adjustment, 42777-42779 [E9-20419]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
violations of law that are not strictly
within its statutory or other authority or
may compile information in the course
of an investigation which may not be
relevant to a specific prosecution. It is
impossible to determine in advance
what information collected during an
investigation will be important or
crucial to the apprehension of fugitives.
In the interests of effective law
enforcement, it is necessary to retain
such information in this system of
records because it can aid in
establishing patterns of criminal activity
and can provide valuable leads for
federal and other law enforcement
agencies. This consideration applies
equally to information acquired from, or
collated or analyzed for, both law
enforcement agencies and agencies of
the U.S. foreign intelligence community
and military community.
(7) From subsection (e)(2) because in
a criminal, civil, or regulatory
investigation, prosecution, or
proceeding, the requirement that
information be collected to the greatest
extent practicable from the subject
individual would present a serious
impediment to law enforcement because
the subject of the investigation,
prosecution, or proceeding would be
placed on notice as to the existence and
nature of the investigation, prosecution,
and proceeding and would therefore be
able to avoid detection or apprehension,
to influence witnesses improperly, to
destroy evidence, or to fabricate
testimony. Moreover, thorough and
effective investigation and prosecution
may require seeking information from a
number of different sources.
(8) From subsection (e)(3) (to the
extent applicable) because the
requirement that individuals supplying
information be provided a form stating
the requirements of subsection (e)(3)
would constitute a serious impediment
to law enforcement in that it could
compromise the existence of a
confidential investigation or reveal the
identity of witnesses or confidential
informants and endanger their lives,
health, and physical safety. The
individual could seriously interfere
with undercover investigative
techniques and could take appropriate
steps to evade the investigation or flee
a specific area.
(9) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (H) and
(I) because this system is exempt from
the access provisions of subsection (d)
pursuant to subsections (j) and (k) of the
Privacy Act.
(10) From subsection (e)(5) because
the acquisition, collation, and analysis
of information for law enforcement
purposes from various agencies does not
permit a determination in advance or a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:42 Aug 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
prediction of what information will be
matched with other information and
thus whether it is accurate, relevant,
timely and complete. With the passage
of time, seemingly irrelevant or
untimely information may acquire new
significance as further investigation
brings new details to light and the
accuracy of such information can often
only be determined in a court of law.
The restrictions imposed by subsection
(e)(5) would restrict the ability of
trained investigators, intelligence
analysts, and government attorneys to
exercise their judgment in collating and
analyzing information and would
impede the development of criminal or
other intelligence necessary for effective
law enforcement.
(11) From subsection (e)(8) because
the individual notice requirements of
subsection (e)(8) could present a serious
impediment to law enforcement by
revealing investigative techniques,
procedures, evidence, or interest and
interfering with the ability to issue
warrants or subpoenas, and could give
persons sufficient warning to evade
investigative efforts.
(12) From subsections (f) and (g)
because these subsections are
inapplicable to the extent that the
system is exempt from other specific
subsections of the Privacy Act.
Dated: August 18, 2009.
Nancy C. Libin,
Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–20364 Filed 8–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
42 CFR Part 3
RIN 0991–AB53
Patient Safety and Quality
Improvement: Civil Money Penalty
Inflation Adjustment
AGENCY: Office for Civil Rights, Office of
the Secretary, HHS.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of Health and
Human Services amends the Patient
Safety and Quality Improvement Rule
by adjusting for inflation the maximum
civil money penalty amount for
violations of the confidentiality
provisions of the Rule. We are amending
the penalty amount to comply with the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990. We are using
direct final rulemaking for this action
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42777
because we expect that there will be no
significant adverse comment on the
rule.
DATES: This rule is effective November
23, 2009 without further action, unless
significant adverse comment is received
by September 24, 2009. If significant
adverse comment is received, OCR will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
document in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to one of
the following addresses. Please do not
submit duplicate comments. We will
treat a comment directed to either the
direct final rule or proposed rule
(discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section) as being directed
towards both, therefore there is no need
to submit comments on both
documents.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: You
may submit electronic comments at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting electronic
comments. Attachments should be in
Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or Excel;
however, we prefer Microsoft Word.
• Regular, Express, or Overnight Mail:
You may mail written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following
address only: U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, Office for Civil
Rights, Attention: PSQIA CMP
Adjustment (RIN 0991–AB53), Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, Room 509F, 200
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201. Mailed
comments may be subject to delivery
delays due to security procedures.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be timely received in the
event of delivery delays.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: If you
prefer, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following
address only: Office for Civil Rights,
Attention: PSQIA CMP Adjustment (RIN
0991–AB53), Hubert H. Humphrey
Building, Room 509F, 200
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201. (Because access
to the interior of the Hubert H.
Humphrey Building is not readily
available to persons without federal
government identification, commenters
are encouraged to leave their comments
in the mail drop slots located in the
main lobby of the building.)
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period will be available for
public inspection, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We will post all comments
received before the close of the
E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM
25AUR1
42778
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
comment period at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andra Wicks, 202–205–2292.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Use of a Direct Final Rule
The Department has chosen to issue
this rule as a direct final rule because
we do not expect to receive any
significant adverse comment on the
rule. A direct final rule is a rule that
provides an opportunity for comment
and then automatically becomes
effective on a later date if no significant
adverse comments are received. We do
not anticipate significant adverse
comments because this rule’s
amendment is required by the Federal
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note, as
amended by the Debt Collection
Improvement Act of 1996 (31 U.S.C.
3701)) (Inflation Adjustment Act), and
the Department has no discretion in
how it calculates the adjustment.
As reflected in the DATES section
above, for this direct final rule we are
providing a 30-day comment period,
and the rule will then become effective
60 days later if no significant adverse
comments are received. If we do not
receive any significant adverse
comments in response to the direct final
rule or the proposed rule discussed
below, this rule will become effective on
the date set forth in the DATES section.
If we receive significant adverse
comments to this direct final rule or the
proposed rule, we will publish a
document withdrawing this final rule in
the Federal Register prior to that date.
In the proposed rule section of this
issue of the Federal Register, we are
concurrently proposing and soliciting
comments on this rule. If we withdraw
this direct final rule based on the receipt
of any significant adverse comments, we
will publish a final rule based on the
proposed rule and any comments to the
proposed or direct final rule.
The Department will not provide
additional opportunity for comment.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
II. Background
The Patient Safety and Quality and
Improvement Act of 2005 (Patient Safety
Act), 42 U.S.C. 299b–21 to 299b–26,
amended Title IX of the Public Health
Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 299 et seq., the
authorizing statute for the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality. The
Patient Safety Act creates a voluntary
program through which health care
providers can share information related
to patient safety events and concerns
(known as patient safety work product
(PSWP)) with patient safety
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:42 Aug 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
organizations (PSOs) for the purpose of
improving patient safety and the quality
of care nationwide. The Patient Safety
Act requires the Department of Health
and Human Services (‘‘HHS’’ or ‘‘the
Department’’) to maintain a listing of
PSOs. The Patient Safety Act provides
that PSWP is both privileged and
confidential. While participation in the
patient safety program is voluntary, a
violation of the Patient Safety Act’s
confidentiality requirements is subject
to a civil money penalty (CMP) of up to
$10,000. 42 U.S.C. 299b–22(f).
On November 21, 2008, the
Department promulgated regulations to
implement the Patient Safety Act. 73 FR
70732, Nov. 21, 2008, adding 42 CFR
part 3. The regulations provide for the
listing and delisting of PSOs, the
confidentiality and privilege protections
of PSWP, and procedures for
enforcement against violations of the
regulations’ confidentiality
requirements. In particular, under
§ 3.404, a person who discloses
identifiable PSWP in knowing or
reckless violation of the Patient Safety
Act and 42 CFR part 3 shall be subject
to a CMP of not more than $10,000 for
each act constituting a violation.
The Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality administers the provisions
of the regulations relating to PSOs. The
Office for Civil Rights investigates and
enforces compliance with the
confidentiality provisions and, if
warranted, may assess CMPs for
knowing or reckless violations of
confidentiality.
III. The Inflation Adjustment Act
Congress enacted the Inflation
Adjustment Act based on its findings
that the impact of CMPs had been
reduced by inflation and that reducing
the impact of CMPs had weakened their
deterrent effect. Inflation Adjustment
Act § 2, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. In general,
the Inflation Adjustment Act requires
Federal agencies to issue regulations to
adjust for inflation each CMP provided
by law within their jurisdiction. The
Inflation Adjustment Act applies to civil
penalties found within the Public
Health Service Act, such as the Patient
Safety Act’s CMP provision.1
1 We note that § 4 of the Inflation Adjustment Act,
found at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note, excludes a small
number of statutes, such as the Social Security Act,
from the requirement for agencies to adjust their
CMPs for inflation. Because the CMPs for title II,
subtitle F (Administrative Simplification) of the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA) are found at section 1176 of the
Social Security Act, the Department has not made
similar inflation adjustments to the HIPAA
administrative simplification CMPs at 45 CFR
160.404.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Inflation Adjustment Act directs
agencies to issue regulations to adjust
CMPs under their authority by October
23, 1996, and to make additional
adjustments at least once every four
years thereafter. Because the Patient
Safety Act was enacted after October 23,
1996, we interpret the Inflation
Adjustment Act as requiring the
Department to issue a regulation to
adjust for inflation the Patient Safety
Act’s CMP amount at least once every
four years, beginning from the Patient
Safety Act’s date of enactment, which
was July 29, 2005. Thus, we are issuing
this rule four years from the Patient
Safety Act’s enactment.
IV. Description of Amendment
The Inflation Adjustment Act
provides for the adjustment of a penalty
amount through a three-step process.
First, we calculate an increase in the
penalty amount by a ‘‘cost-of-living
adjustment.’’ Inflation Adjustment Act
§ 5(a), 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. The Inflation
Adjustment Act defines the cost-ofliving adjustment as ‘‘the percentage (if
any) for each civil monetary penalty by
which—(1) the Consumer Price Index
for the month of June of the calendar
year preceding the adjustment, exceeds
(2) the Consumer Price Index for the
month of June of the calendar year in
which the amount of such civil
monetary penalty was last set or
adjusted pursuant to law.’’ Inflation
Adjustment Act § 5(b), 28 U.S.C. 2461
note. Second, we round the adjustment
amount pursuant to the methodology set
forth in section 5(a) of the Inflation
Adjustment Act, which rounds the
increase based on the size of the
underlying penalty, as follows:
Any increase determined under this
subsection shall be rounded to the nearest—
(1) Multiple of $10 in the case of penalties
less than or equal to $100;
(2) Multiple of $100 in the case of penalties
greater than $100 but less than or equal to
$1,000;
(3) Multiple of $1,000 in the case of
penalties greater than $1,000 but less than or
equal to $10,000;
(4) Multiple of $5,000 in the case of
penalties greater than $10,000 but less than
or equal to $100,000;
(5) Multiple of $10,000 in the case of
penalties greater than $100,000 but less than
or equal to $200,000; and
(6) Multiple of $25,000 in the case of
penalties greater than $200,000.
Third, pursuant to the Debt Collection
Improvement Act of 1996 § 31001(s)(2)’s
amendment to the Inflation Adjustment
Act, we must limit the first adjustment
of a CMP to ten percent of the penalty
amount.
With respect to step 1 of the
adjustment, the Consumer Price Index
E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM
25AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(CPI) for June of 2008 (the calendar year
preceding this adjustment) was
218.815.2 The CPI for June of 2005 (the
calendar year in which the Patient
Safety Act CMP was last set) was 194.5.
The percent change in these CPIs is an
increase of 12.5 percent. This leads to
an unrounded increase in the Patient
Safety Act’s CMP of $1,250.
Under step 2, we round the amount of
the increase ($1,250) based on the size
of the penalty ($10,000). Because the
penalty of $10,000 is ‘‘greater than
$1,000 but less than or equal to
$10,000,’’ we round the increase to the
nearest multiple of $1,000. This leads to
a rounded increase of $1,000, for an
increased penalty of $11,000.
Step 3 requires that the first
adjustment to a civil penalty be limited
to 10 percent of the penalty amount.
This is the first adjustment to the
Patient Safety Act’s CMP. Therefore,
this 10 percent cap is applicable.
Pursuant to this cap, the adjusted
penalty cannot exceed $11,000. Because
the adjusted penalty is $11,000, it does
not exceed the cap. Accordingly, the
Patient Safety Act’s revised maximum
CMP amount, after adjusting for
inflation pursuant to the Inflation
Adjustment Act, is $11,000.
Based on the above, we are amending
42 CFR 3.404(b) to provide that the
Secretary may impose a CMP of not
more than $11,000, rather than the
current limit of $10,000, for a violation
of the Patient Safety Act’s
confidentiality requirements.
V. Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.30(a) and (h) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act 1995
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
We have concluded that the CMP
adjustment in this direct final rule is not
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520) because it does not
constitute a ‘‘collection of information.’’
That is, the adjustment does not require
disclosure of any information to the
Department, third parties, or the public.
2 The Inflation Adjustment Act defines
‘‘Consumer Price Index’’ as ‘‘the Consumer Price
Index for all-urban consumers published by the
Department of Labor.’’ Historic data on the
Consumer Price Index for all-urban consumers,
including the data relied upon in this rulemaking,
can be found at ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/
special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:42 Aug 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
VII. Federalism
The Department has analyzed this
direct final rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order
13132. We have determined that the
rule does not contain policies that have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, we
have concluded that the rule does not
contain policies that have Federalism
implications as defined in the Executive
Order and, consequently, a Federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
VIII. Analysis of Impacts
The Department has examined the
impacts of the direct final rule under
Executive Order 12866, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). Executive Order
12866 directs agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). The Department
believes that this direct final rule is not
a significant regulatory action under the
Executive Order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because this direct final rule
simply adjusts the maximum amount of
a CMP, and because the adjustment is
required by the Inflation Adjustment
Act, the Department certifies that the
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $133
million, using the most current (2008)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product.3 The Department
3 According to the U.S. Department of Commerce,
Bureau of Economic Analysis, the implicit price
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42779
does not expect this direct final rule to
result in any 1-year expenditure that
would meet or exceed this amount.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and
procedure, Civil money penalty,
Confidentiality, Conflict of interests,
Courts, Freedom of information, Health,
Health care, Health facilities, Health
insurance, Health professions, Health
records, Hospitals, Investigations, Law
enforcement, Medical research,
Organization and functions, Patient,
Patient safety, Privacy, Privilege, Public
health, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Safety, State and local
governments, Technical assistance.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
amend part 3 of title 42 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
■
PART 3—PATIENT SAFETY
ORGANIZATIONS AND PATIENT
SAFETY WORK PRODUCT
1. The authority citation for part 3
continues to read:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 216, 299b–21 through
299b–26; 42 U.S.C. 299c–6.
2. Amend § 3.404 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 3.404
Amount of a civil money penalty.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Secretary may impose a civil
money penalty in the amount of not
more than $11,000.
Dated: August 18, 2009.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–20419 Filed 8–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 202, 209, 214, 227, 237,
and 252
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Technical
Amendments
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: DoD is making technical
amendments to the Defense Federal
deflator for gross domestic product was indexed at
92.106 in 1995 (the year of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act) and 122.422 in 2008. See https://
www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/ (Table 1.1.9).
E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM
25AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 25, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42777-42779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20419]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
42 CFR Part 3
RIN 0991-AB53
Patient Safety and Quality Improvement: Civil Money Penalty
Inflation Adjustment
AGENCY: Office for Civil Rights, Office of the Secretary, HHS.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services amends the Patient
Safety and Quality Improvement Rule by adjusting for inflation the
maximum civil money penalty amount for violations of the
confidentiality provisions of the Rule. We are amending the penalty
amount to comply with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment
Act of 1990. We are using direct final rulemaking for this action
because we expect that there will be no significant adverse comment on
the rule.
DATES: This rule is effective November 23, 2009 without further action,
unless significant adverse comment is received by September 24, 2009.
If significant adverse comment is received, OCR will publish a timely
withdrawal of the document in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to one of the following addresses. Please do
not submit duplicate comments. We will treat a comment directed to
either the direct final rule or proposed rule (discussed in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) as being directed towards both,
therefore there is no need to submit comments on both documents.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: You may submit electronic
comments at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting electronic comments. Attachments should be in Microsoft
Word, WordPerfect, or Excel; however, we prefer Microsoft Word.
Regular, Express, or Overnight Mail: You may mail written
comments (one original and two copies) to the following address only:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights,
Attention: PSQIA CMP Adjustment (RIN 0991-AB53), Hubert H. Humphrey
Building, Room 509F, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20201. Mailed comments may be subject to delivery delays due to
security procedures. Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments
to be timely received in the event of delivery delays.
Hand Delivery or Courier: If you prefer, you may deliver
(by hand or courier) your written comments (one original and two
copies) to the following address only: Office for Civil Rights,
Attention: PSQIA CMP Adjustment (RIN 0991-AB53), Hubert H. Humphrey
Building, Room 509F, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20201. (Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey
Building is not readily available to persons without federal government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the mail drop slots located in the main lobby of the building.)
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period will be available for public inspection,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We will post all comments
received before the close of the
[[Page 42778]]
comment period at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andra Wicks, 202-205-2292.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Use of a Direct Final Rule
The Department has chosen to issue this rule as a direct final rule
because we do not expect to receive any significant adverse comment on
the rule. A direct final rule is a rule that provides an opportunity
for comment and then automatically becomes effective on a later date if
no significant adverse comments are received. We do not anticipate
significant adverse comments because this rule's amendment is required
by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28
U.S.C. 2461 note, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of
1996 (31 U.S.C. 3701)) (Inflation Adjustment Act), and the Department
has no discretion in how it calculates the adjustment.
As reflected in the DATES section above, for this direct final rule
we are providing a 30-day comment period, and the rule will then become
effective 60 days later if no significant adverse comments are
received. If we do not receive any significant adverse comments in
response to the direct final rule or the proposed rule discussed below,
this rule will become effective on the date set forth in the DATES
section. If we receive significant adverse comments to this direct
final rule or the proposed rule, we will publish a document withdrawing
this final rule in the Federal Register prior to that date.
In the proposed rule section of this issue of the Federal Register,
we are concurrently proposing and soliciting comments on this rule. If
we withdraw this direct final rule based on the receipt of any
significant adverse comments, we will publish a final rule based on the
proposed rule and any comments to the proposed or direct final rule.
The Department will not provide additional opportunity for comment.
II. Background
The Patient Safety and Quality and Improvement Act of 2005 (Patient
Safety Act), 42 U.S.C. 299b-21 to 299b-26, amended Title IX of the
Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 299 et seq., the authorizing
statute for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The Patient
Safety Act creates a voluntary program through which health care
providers can share information related to patient safety events and
concerns (known as patient safety work product (PSWP)) with patient
safety organizations (PSOs) for the purpose of improving patient safety
and the quality of care nationwide. The Patient Safety Act requires the
Department of Health and Human Services (``HHS'' or ``the Department'')
to maintain a listing of PSOs. The Patient Safety Act provides that
PSWP is both privileged and confidential. While participation in the
patient safety program is voluntary, a violation of the Patient Safety
Act's confidentiality requirements is subject to a civil money penalty
(CMP) of up to $10,000. 42 U.S.C. 299b-22(f).
On November 21, 2008, the Department promulgated regulations to
implement the Patient Safety Act. 73 FR 70732, Nov. 21, 2008, adding 42
CFR part 3. The regulations provide for the listing and delisting of
PSOs, the confidentiality and privilege protections of PSWP, and
procedures for enforcement against violations of the regulations'
confidentiality requirements. In particular, under Sec. 3.404, a
person who discloses identifiable PSWP in knowing or reckless violation
of the Patient Safety Act and 42 CFR part 3 shall be subject to a CMP
of not more than $10,000 for each act constituting a violation.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality administers the
provisions of the regulations relating to PSOs. The Office for Civil
Rights investigates and enforces compliance with the confidentiality
provisions and, if warranted, may assess CMPs for knowing or reckless
violations of confidentiality.
III. The Inflation Adjustment Act
Congress enacted the Inflation Adjustment Act based on its findings
that the impact of CMPs had been reduced by inflation and that reducing
the impact of CMPs had weakened their deterrent effect. Inflation
Adjustment Act Sec. 2, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. In general, the Inflation
Adjustment Act requires Federal agencies to issue regulations to adjust
for inflation each CMP provided by law within their jurisdiction. The
Inflation Adjustment Act applies to civil penalties found within the
Public Health Service Act, such as the Patient Safety Act's CMP
provision.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We note that Sec. 4 of the Inflation Adjustment Act, found
at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note, excludes a small number of statutes, such as
the Social Security Act, from the requirement for agencies to adjust
their CMPs for inflation. Because the CMPs for title II, subtitle F
(Administrative Simplification) of the Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) are found at section 1176 of
the Social Security Act, the Department has not made similar
inflation adjustments to the HIPAA administrative simplification
CMPs at 45 CFR 160.404.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Inflation Adjustment Act directs agencies to issue regulations
to adjust CMPs under their authority by October 23, 1996, and to make
additional adjustments at least once every four years thereafter.
Because the Patient Safety Act was enacted after October 23, 1996, we
interpret the Inflation Adjustment Act as requiring the Department to
issue a regulation to adjust for inflation the Patient Safety Act's CMP
amount at least once every four years, beginning from the Patient
Safety Act's date of enactment, which was July 29, 2005. Thus, we are
issuing this rule four years from the Patient Safety Act's enactment.
IV. Description of Amendment
The Inflation Adjustment Act provides for the adjustment of a
penalty amount through a three-step process. First, we calculate an
increase in the penalty amount by a ``cost-of-living adjustment.''
Inflation Adjustment Act Sec. 5(a), 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. The Inflation
Adjustment Act defines the cost-of-living adjustment as ``the
percentage (if any) for each civil monetary penalty by which--(1) the
Consumer Price Index for the month of June of the calendar year
preceding the adjustment, exceeds (2) the Consumer Price Index for the
month of June of the calendar year in which the amount of such civil
monetary penalty was last set or adjusted pursuant to law.'' Inflation
Adjustment Act Sec. 5(b), 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. Second, we round the
adjustment amount pursuant to the methodology set forth in section 5(a)
of the Inflation Adjustment Act, which rounds the increase based on the
size of the underlying penalty, as follows:
Any increase determined under this subsection shall be rounded
to the nearest--
(1) Multiple of $10 in the case of penalties less than or equal
to $100;
(2) Multiple of $100 in the case of penalties greater than $100
but less than or equal to $1,000;
(3) Multiple of $1,000 in the case of penalties greater than
$1,000 but less than or equal to $10,000;
(4) Multiple of $5,000 in the case of penalties greater than
$10,000 but less than or equal to $100,000;
(5) Multiple of $10,000 in the case of penalties greater than
$100,000 but less than or equal to $200,000; and
(6) Multiple of $25,000 in the case of penalties greater than
$200,000.
Third, pursuant to the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 Sec.
31001(s)(2)'s amendment to the Inflation Adjustment Act, we must limit
the first adjustment of a CMP to ten percent of the penalty amount.
With respect to step 1 of the adjustment, the Consumer Price Index
[[Page 42779]]
(CPI) for June of 2008 (the calendar year preceding this adjustment)
was 218.815.\2\ The CPI for June of 2005 (the calendar year in which
the Patient Safety Act CMP was last set) was 194.5. The percent change
in these CPIs is an increase of 12.5 percent. This leads to an
unrounded increase in the Patient Safety Act's CMP of $1,250.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Inflation Adjustment Act defines ``Consumer Price
Index'' as ``the Consumer Price Index for all-urban consumers
published by the Department of Labor.'' Historic data on the
Consumer Price Index for all-urban consumers, including the data
relied upon in this rulemaking, can be found at ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under step 2, we round the amount of the increase ($1,250) based on
the size of the penalty ($10,000). Because the penalty of $10,000 is
``greater than $1,000 but less than or equal to $10,000,'' we round the
increase to the nearest multiple of $1,000. This leads to a rounded
increase of $1,000, for an increased penalty of $11,000.
Step 3 requires that the first adjustment to a civil penalty be
limited to 10 percent of the penalty amount. This is the first
adjustment to the Patient Safety Act's CMP. Therefore, this 10 percent
cap is applicable. Pursuant to this cap, the adjusted penalty cannot
exceed $11,000. Because the adjusted penalty is $11,000, it does not
exceed the cap. Accordingly, the Patient Safety Act's revised maximum
CMP amount, after adjusting for inflation pursuant to the Inflation
Adjustment Act, is $11,000.
Based on the above, we are amending 42 CFR 3.404(b) to provide that
the Secretary may impose a CMP of not more than $11,000, rather than
the current limit of $10,000, for a violation of the Patient Safety
Act's confidentiality requirements.
V. Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR 25.30(a) and (h) that this action
is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act 1995
We have concluded that the CMP adjustment in this direct final rule
is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) because it
does not constitute a ``collection of information.'' That is, the
adjustment does not require disclosure of any information to the
Department, third parties, or the public.
VII. Federalism
The Department has analyzed this direct final rule in accordance
with the principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. We have
determined that the rule does not contain policies that have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Accordingly, we have concluded that the rule does not contain policies
that have Federalism implications as defined in the Executive Order
and, consequently, a Federalism summary impact statement is not
required.
VIII. Analysis of Impacts
The Department has examined the impacts of the direct final rule
under Executive Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary,
to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Department believes
that this direct final rule is not a significant regulatory action
under the Executive Order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because this direct final rule simply adjusts the
maximum amount of a CMP, and because the adjustment is required by the
Inflation Adjustment Act, the Department certifies that the rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $133 million, using the most current (2008) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product.\3\ The Department does
not expect this direct final rule to result in any 1-year expenditure
that would meet or exceed this amount.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of
Economic Analysis, the implicit price deflator for gross domestic
product was indexed at 92.106 in 1995 (the year of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act) and 122.422 in 2008. See https://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/ (Table 1.1.9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and procedure, Civil money penalty,
Confidentiality, Conflict of interests, Courts, Freedom of information,
Health, Health care, Health facilities, Health insurance, Health
professions, Health records, Hospitals, Investigations, Law
enforcement, Medical research, Organization and functions, Patient,
Patient safety, Privacy, Privilege, Public health, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety, State and local governments,
Technical assistance.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, amend part 3 of title 42 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 3--PATIENT SAFETY ORGANIZATIONS AND PATIENT SAFETY WORK
PRODUCT
0
1. The authority citation for part 3 continues to read:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 216, 299b-21 through 299b-26; 42 U.S.C.
299c-6.
0
2. Amend Sec. 3.404 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 3.404 Amount of a civil money penalty.
* * * * *
(b) The Secretary may impose a civil money penalty in the amount of
not more than $11,000.
Dated: August 18, 2009.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-20419 Filed 8-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P