Legal Process: Testimony by Employees and Production of Records, 42028-42032 [E9-20031]
Download as PDF
42028
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 160 / Thursday, August 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:31 Aug 19, 2009
Jkt 217001
categorical exclusion determination are
not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. A new § 165.1324 is added to read
as follows:
■
§ 165.1324 Safety and Security Zone;
Cruise Ship Protection, Elliott Bay and Pier91, Seattle, Washington.
(a) Safety and Security Zones. (1) The
following area is a safety and security
zone: All waters within the following
points: a rectangle, starting at 47°37′53″
N/122°23′07″ W, thence south to
position 47°37′06″ N/122°23′07″ W,
thence east to position 47°37′06″ N/
122°22′43″ W, thence north to position
47°37′58″ N/122°22′43″ W. This zone
will be enforced only during the arrival
or departure of Large Passenger Cruise
Vessels at Pier 91, Seattle, Washington.
(2) The following area is a safety and
security zone: All waters within 100
yards of Pier 91, Seattle, Washington, at
approximate position 47°37′35″ N/
122°23′00″ W. This zone will be
enforced only when a Large Passenger
Cruise Vessel is moored at Pier 91.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart D, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in either Safety and
Security Zone except for vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representatives.
(c) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
Facility Security Officer means the
person designated as responsible for the
development, implementation, revision
and maintenance of the facility security
plan and for liaison with the COTP and
Company and Vessel Security Officers.
Large Passenger Cruise Vessel means
any cruise ship over 100 feet in length
carrying passengers for hire. Large
Passenger Cruise Vessel does not
include vessels inspected and
certificated under 46 CFR, Chapter I,
Subchapter T such as excursion vessels,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
sight seeing vessels, dinner cruise
vessels, and whale watching vessels.
Official Patrol means those persons
designated by the Captain of the Port to
monitor a Large Passenger Cruise Vessel
security and safety zone, permit entry
into the zone, give legally enforceable
orders to persons or vessels within the
zone and take other actions authorized
by the Captain of the Port. Persons
authorized in paragraph (e) to enforce
this section are designated as the
Official Patrol.
(d) Authorization. To request
authorization to operate within 100
yards of a Large Passenger Cruise Vessel
that is moored at Pier 91, contact the onscene Official Patrol on VHF–FM
channel 16 or 13 or the Facility Security
Officer at (206) 728–3688.
(e) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
may enforce the rules in this section. In
the navigable waters of the United
States to which this section applies,
when immediate action is required and
representatives of the Coast Guard are
not present or not present in sufficient
force to provide effective enforcement of
this section in the vicinity of a Large
Passenger Cruise Vessel, any Federal or
Washington Law Enforcement Officer
may enforce the rules contained in this
section pursuant to 33 CFR 6.04–11. In
addition, the Captain of the Port may be
assisted by other Federal, state or local
agencies in enforcing this section.
(f) Waiver. The Captain of the Port
Puget Sound may waive any of the
requirements of this section for any
vessel or class of vessels upon finding
that a vessel or class of vessels,
operational conditions or other
circumstances are such that application
of this section is unnecessary or
impractical for the purpose of port
security, safety or environmental safety.
Dated: April 24, 2009.
Suzanne E. Englebert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. E9–19958 Filed 8–19–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PRESIDIO TRUST
36 CFR Part 1012
RIN 3212–AA–04
Legal Process: Testimony by
Employees and Production of Records
Presidio Trust.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Presidio Trust is
publishing as a final rule a regulation,
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 160 / Thursday, August 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
limited to the Presidio Trust’s
organization and management,
governing access to Presidio Trust
information and records in connection
with legal proceedings in which neither
the United States nor the Presidio Trust
is a party. This final rule establishes
guidelines for use in determining
whether Presidio Trust employees (as
defined in the final rule) will provide
testimony or records relating to their
official duties. It also establishes
procedures for requesters to follow
when making demands on or requests to
a Presidio Trust employee for official
documents or to provide testimony.
This final rule standardizes the Presidio
Trust’s practices, promotes uniformity
in decisions, conserves the ability of the
Presidio Trust to conduct official
business, preserves its employee
resources, protects confidential
information, provides guidance to
requestors, minimizes involvement in
matters unrelated to the Presidio Trust’s
mission and programs, avoids wasteful
allocation of agency resources and
avoids spending public time and money
for private purpose.
DATES: The effective date of the
regulation is September 25, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Cook, General Counsel,
Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O.
Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129–
0052. Telephone: 415.561.5300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Presidio Trust, a wholly-owned
federal government corporation, on
occasion receives subpoenas and other
requests for documents and requests for
Presidio Trust employees (as defined in
the final rule) to provide testimony or
evidence in judicial, legislative or
administrative proceedings in which the
Presidio Trust is not a party. Sometimes
these subpoenas or requests are for
Presidio Trust records that are exempt
from disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act. The Presidio Trust also
receives requests for Presidio Trust
employees to appear as witnesses and to
provide testimony relating to materials
contained in the Presidio Trust’s official
records or to provide testimony or
information acquired during the
performance of the employees’ official
duties.
Although many other federal agencies
currently have regulations in place to
address these types of requests and the
Presidio Trust itself has rules governing
requests for information under the
Freedom of Information Act, the
Presidio Trust has not previously
adopted regulations governing
subpoenas and other information
requests for document production and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:31 Aug 19, 2009
Jkt 217001
testimony of Presidio Trust employees
in judicial, legislative or administrative
proceedings in which the Presidio Trust
is not a party. Issues about such requests
that have arisen in recent years warrant
adoption of regulations governing their
submission, evaluation and processing.
Responding to these requests is not only
burdensome, but may also result in a
significant disruption of a Presidio Trust
employee’s work schedule, may involve
the Presidio Trust in issues unrelated to
its responsibilities and may impede the
Presidio Trust’s accomplishment of its
budgetary goals. In order to resolve
these issues, many agencies have issued
regulations, similar to this regulation,
governing the circumstances and
manner for responding to demands for
testimony or for the production of
documents. Establishing uniform
procedures for submission, evaluation
and response to such demands will
ensure timely notice and will promote
centralized decision making. The
United States Supreme Court upheld
this type of regulation in United States
ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462
(1951).
Briefly summarized, the final rule
prohibits disclosure of official records
or testimony by the Presidio Trust’s
employees unless there is compliance
with the rule. The final rule sets out the
information that requesters must
provide and the factors that the Presidio
Trust will consider in making
determinations in response to requests
for testimony or the production of
documents.
This final rule ensures a more
efficient use of the Presidio Trust’s
resources, minimizes the possibility of
involving the Presidio Trust in issues
unrelated to its mission or
responsibilities, promotes uniformity in
responding to such subpoenas and
similar requests, and maintains the
impartiality of the Presidio Trust in
matters that are in dispute between
other parties. It also serves the Presidio
Trust’s interest in protecting sensitive,
confidential and privileged information
and records that are generated in
fulfillment of the Presidio Trust’s
responsibilities.
The final rule is internal and
procedural rather than substantive. It
does not create a right to obtain official
records or the official testimony of a
Presidio Trust employee; nor does it
create any additional right or privilege
not already available to the Presidio
Trust to deny any demand or request for
testimony or documents. Failure to
comply with the procedures set out in
these regulations would be a basis for
denying a demand or request submitted
to the Presidio Trust.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42029
This rulemaking is in compliance
with the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. 553) and follows a 30-day
comment period. During this period the
Presidio Trust received and considered
one comment. This comment proposed
that the scope of the regulation in
Section 1012.1 be amended to exempt
suits in which Presidio Trust board
members are sued in their official
capacity. The commenter believed that
some such suits would not qualify for
treatment under these regulations
pursuant to United States ex rel. Touhy
v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951) and that
the determination of whether the
Presidio Trust has a direct and
substantial interest in such suits against
Presidio Trust board members should
not be made by the Presidio Trust. The
Presidio Trust considered this comment
and believes that because the
applicability of these regulations in any
particular proceeding or circumstance is
subject to judicial review, there is
adequate assurance that the
requirements set by the Touhy decision
or other applicable law will be applied.
The Presidio Trust will continue to
review these regulations in the future,
and if it becomes apparent that they
should be modified based on changes in
the law or experience with their
implementation, then the Presidio Trust
will do so through the rulemaking
process.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This final rule, because it is limited to
the Presidio Trust’s organization and
management, does not fall within the
definition of a ‘‘Rule’’ under Executive
Order 12866 issued September 30, 1993
on Regulatory Planning and Review.
Moreover, this final rule will not have
an annual effect of $100 million or more
on the economy nor adversely affect
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety,
nor State or local governments. This
final rule will neither interfere with an
action taken or planned by another
agency nor raise new legal or policy
issues. This final rule will not alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients of
such programs. Therefore, it has been
determined that this is not an
economically significant rule.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
This final rule has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, and
will not unduly burden the Federal
court system. This final rule has been
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
42030
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 160 / Thursday, August 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
written so as to minimize litigation and
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, and has been reviewed
carefully to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguities. Additionally, the Presidio
Trust has not identified any State or
local laws or regulations that are in
conflict with this regulation or that
would impede full implementation of
this final rule. Nonetheless, in the event
that such a conflict was to be identified,
the final rule would preempt State or
local laws or regulations found to be in
conflict. However, in that case, (1) no
retroactive effect would be given to this
final rule; and (2) the final rule does not
require the use of administration
proceedings before parties may file suit
in court challenging its provisions.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This final rule conforms with the
Federalism principles set out in
Executive Order 13132 and would not
impose any compliance costs on the
States; and would not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, it has
been determined that this final rule does
not have federalism implications.
Unfunded Mandates
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538) as well as Executive Order
12875, the Presidio Trust has assessed
the effects of this final rule on State,
local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. This final rule does not
compel the expenditure of $100 million
or more in any one year by any State,
local, or Tribal governments or anyone
in the private sector. Therefore, a
statement under section 202 of the Act
is not required.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
With Indian Tribal Governments
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175 of
November 6, 2000, the Presidio Trust
has assessed the impact of this final rule
on Indian Tribal governments and has
determined that the final rule does not
significantly or uniquely affect
communities of Indian Tribal
governments. The Presidio Trust has
also determined that this final rule does
not impose substantial direct
compliance costs or Tribal implications
on Indian tribal governments, and
therefore advance consultation with
Tribes is not required.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:31 Aug 19, 2009
Jkt 217001
Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Executive Order 13272—Consideration
of Small Entities
This final rule has been considered in
light of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 602 et seq.) and Executive Order
13272 of August 13, 2002. This final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive
Order 13272, because the final rule will
not impose recordkeeping requirements
on them; it will not affect their
competitive position in relation to large
entities; and it will not affect their cash
flow, liquidity or ability to remain in the
market.
Certification
The Presidio Trust certifies that this
final rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act or
Executive Order 13272.
Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Because this final
rule is a rule of agency organization,
procedure or practice that does not
substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties it is
not a ‘‘Rule’’ as defined by the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C)) and is not subject to it.
Executive Order 13211—Energy Effects
This final rule is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ as defined in Executive
Order 13211 of May 22, 2001, because
it is not likely to have a significant
adverse affect on the supply,
distribution or use of energy. The
Presidio Trust has determined that this
final rule is not likely to have any
adverse energy effects.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no paperwork
burdens or information collection
requirements that are subject to review
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Presidio Trust has analyzed this
final rule in accordance with the criteria
of the National Environmental Policy
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Act of 1969 and determined that the
rule does not constitute a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
Government Paperwork Elimination
Act
The Presidio Trust is committed to
compliance with the Government
Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA),
which requires Government agencies to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible. This final rule contains
no paperwork burdens or information
collection requirements, and is thus in
compliance with the GPEA.
Executive Order 12630—No Takings
Implication
This final rule has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles of and
criteria contained in Executive Order
12630 issued March 15, 1988, and it has
been determined that the final rule does
not pose a risk of a taking of
constitutionally protected private
property.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Presidio Trust amends
chapter X of title 36 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
■ A new part 1012, consisting of
§ 1012.1 through § 1012.11, is added to
chapter X to read as follows:
PART 1012—LEGAL PROCESS:
TESTIMONY BY EMPLOYEES AND
PRODUCTION OF RECORDS
General Information
Sec.
1012.1 What does this part cover?
1012.2 What is the Presidio Trust’s policy
on granting requests for employee
testimony or Presidio Trust records?
Responsibilities of Requesters
1012.3 How can I obtain employee
testimony or Presidio Trust records?
1012.4 If I serve a subpoena duces tecum,
must I also submit a Touhy Request?
1012.5 What information must I put in my
Touhy Request?
1012.6 How much will I be charged?
1012.7 Can I get an authenticated copy of a
Presidio Trust record?
Responsibilities of the Presidio Trust
1012.8 How will the Presidio Trust process
my Touhy Request?
1012.9 What criteria will the Presidio Trust
consider in responding to my Touhy
Request?
Responsibilities of Employees
1012.10 What must I, as an employee, do
upon receiving a request?
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 160 / Thursday, August 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
1012.11 Must I get approval before
testifying as an expert witness other than
on behalf of the United States in a
Federal proceeding in which the United
States is a party or has a direct and
substantial interest?
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix; 40
U.S.C. 102; 44 U.S.C. 2901 and 3102.
General Information
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 1012.1
What does this part cover?
(a) This part describes how the
Presidio Trust responds to requests or
subpoenas for:
(1) Testimony by employees in State,
territorial or Tribal judicial, legislative
or administrative proceedings
concerning information acquired while
performing official duties or because of
an employee’s official status;
(2) Testimony by employees in
Federal court civil proceedings in which
the United States or the Presidio Trust
is not a party concerning information
acquired while performing official
duties or because of an employee’s
official status;
(3) Testimony by employees in any
judicial or administrative proceeding in
which the United States or the Presidio
Trust, while not a party, has a direct and
substantial interest;
(4) Official records or certification of
such records for use in Federal, State,
territorial or Tribal judicial, legislative
or administrative proceedings.
(b) In this part, ‘‘employee’’ means a
current or former Presidio Trust
employee, or Board member, including
a contractor or special government
employee, except as the Presidio Trust
may otherwise determine in a particular
case.
(c) This part does not apply to:
(1) Congressional requests or
subpoenas for testimony or records;
(2) Federal court civil proceedings in
which the United States or the Presidio
Trust is a party;
(3) Federal administrative
proceedings;
(4) Federal, State and Tribal criminal
court proceedings;
(5) Employees who voluntarily testify,
while on their own time or in approved
leave status, as private citizens as to
facts or events that are not related to the
official business of the Presidio Trust.
The employee must state for the record
that the testimony represents the
employee’s own views and is not
necessarily the official position of the
Presidio Trust. See 5 CFR 2635.702(b),
2635.807(b).
(6) Testimony by employees as expert
witnesses on subjects outside their
official duties, except that they must
obtain prior approval if required by
§ 1012.11.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:31 Aug 19, 2009
Jkt 217001
(d) This part does not affect the rights
of any individual or the procedures for
obtaining records under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), Privacy Act, or
statutes governing the certification of
official records. The Presidio Trust
FOIA and Privacy Act regulations are
found at parts 1007 and 1008 of this
chapter.
(e) Nothing in this part is intended to
impede the appropriate disclosure
under applicable laws of Presidio Trust
information to Federal, State, territorial,
Tribal, or foreign law enforcement,
prosecutorial, or regulatory agencies.
(f) This part only provides guidance
for the internal operations of the
Presidio Trust, and neither creates nor
is intended to create any enforceable
right or benefit against the United States
or the Presidio Trust.
§ 1012.2 What is the Presidio Trust’s
policy on granting requests for employee
testimony or Presidio Trust records?
(a) Except for proceedings covered by
§ 1012.1(c) and (d), it is the Presidio
Trust’s general policy not to allow its
employees to testify or to produce
Presidio Trust records either upon
request or by subpoena. However, if the
party seeking such testimony or records
requests in writing, the Presidio Trust
will consider whether to allow
testimony or production of records
under this part. The Presidio Trust’s
policy ensures the orderly execution of
its mission and programs while not
impeding any proceeding
inappropriately.
(b) No Presidio Trust employee may
testify or produce records in any
proceeding to which this part applies
unless authorized by the Presidio Trust
under §§ 1012.1 through 1012.11.
United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen,
340 U.S. 462 (1951).
Responsibilities of Requesters
§ 1012.3 How can I obtain employee
testimony or Presidio Trust records?
(a) To obtain employee testimony, you
must submit:
(1) A written request (hereafter a
‘‘Touhy Request;’’ see § 1012.5 and
United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen,
340 U.S. 462 (1951)); and
(2) A statement that you will submit
a valid check for costs to the Presidio
Trust, in accordance with § 1012.6, if
your Touhy Request is granted.
(b) To obtain official Presidio Trust
records, you must submit:
(1) A Touhy Request; and
(2) A statement that you agree to pay
the costs of search and/or duplication in
accordance with the provisions
governing requests under the Freedom
of Information Act in part 1007 of this
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42031
chapter, if your Touhy Request is
granted.
(c) You must send your Touhy
Request to both:
(1) The employee; and
(2) The General Counsel of the
Presidio Trust.
(d) The address of Presidio Trust
employees and the General Counsel is:
Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O.
Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129–
0052.
§ 1012.4 If I serve a subpoena duces
tecum, must I also submit a Touhy request?
Yes. If you serve a subpoena for
employee testimony or if you serve a
subpoena duces tecum for records in the
possession of the Presidio Trust, you
also must submit a Touhy Request.
§ 1012.5 What information must I put in my
Touhy Request?
Your Touhy Request must:
(a) Identify the employee or record;
(b) Describe the relevance of the
desired testimony or records to your
proceeding and provide a copy of the
pleadings underlying your request;
(c) Identify the parties to your
proceeding and any known
relationships they have with the
Presidio Trust or to its mission or
programs;
(d) Show that the desired testimony or
records are not reasonably available
from any other source;
(e) Show that no record could be
provided and used in lieu of employee
testimony;
(f) Provide the substance of the
testimony expected of the employee;
and
(g) Explain why you believe your
Touhy Request meets the criteria
specified in § 1012.9.
§ 1012.6
How much will I be charged?
We will charge you the costs,
including travel expenses, for
employees to testify under the relevant
substantive and procedural laws and
regulations. You must pay costs for
record production in accordance with
the provisions governing requests under
the Freedom of Information Act in part
1007 of this chapter. Estimated Costs
must be paid in advance by check or
money order payable to the Presidio
Trust. Upon determination of the
precise costs, the Presidio Trust will
either reimburse you for any
overpayment, or charge you for any
underpayment, which charges must be
paid within 10 business days by check
or money order payable to the Presidio
Trust.
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
42032
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 160 / Thursday, August 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
§ 1012.7 Can I get an authenticated copy
of a Presidio Trust record?
Yes. We may provide an
authenticated copy of a Presidio Trust
record, for purposes of admissibility
under Federal, State or Tribal law. We
will do this only if the record has been
officially released or would otherwise
be released under parts 1007 or 1008 of
this chapter, or this part.
Responsibilities of the Presidio Trust
§ 1012.8 How will the Presidio Trust
process my Touhy Request?
(a) The Executive Director will decide
whether to grant or deny your Touhy
Request. The Presidio Trust’s General
Counsel, or his or her agent, may
negotiate with you or your attorney to
refine or limit both the timing and
content of your Touhy Request. When
necessary, the General Counsel also will
coordinate with the Department of
Justice to file appropriate motions,
including motions to remove the matter
to Federal court, to quash, or to obtain
a protective order.
(b) We will limit the Presidio Trust’s
decision to allow employee testimony to
the scope of your Touhy Request.
(c) If you fail to follow the
requirements of this part, we will not
allow the testimony or produce the
records.
(d) If your Touhy Request is complete,
we will consider the request under
§ 1012.9.
§ 1012.9 What criteria will the Presidio
Trust consider in responding to my Touhy
Request?
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
In deciding whether to grant your
Touhy Request, the Executive Director
will consider:
(a) Your ability to obtain the
testimony or records from another
source;
(b) The appropriateness of the
employee testimony and record
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:31 Aug 19, 2009
Jkt 217001
production under the relevant
regulations of procedure and
substantive law, including the FOIA or
the Privacy Act; and
(c) The Presidio Trust’s ability to:
(1) Conduct its official business
unimpeded;
(2) Maintain impartiality in
conducting its business;
(3) Minimize the possibility that the
Presidio Trust will become involved in
issues that are not related to its mission
or programs;
(4) Avoid spending public employees’
time for private purposes;
(5) Avoid any negative cumulative
effect of granting similar requests;
(6) Ensure that privileged or protected
matters remain confidential; and
(7) Avoid undue burden on the
Presidio Trust.
Responsibilities of Employees
§ 1012.10 What must I, as an employee, do
upon receiving a request?
(a) If you receive a request or
subpoena that does not include a Touhy
Request, you must immediately notify
your supervisor and the Presidio Trust’s
General Counsel for assistance in
issuing the proper response.
(b) If you receive a Touhy Request,
you must promptly notify your
supervisor and forward the request to
the General Counsel. After consulting
with the General Counsel, the Executive
Director will decide whether to grant
the Touhy Request under § 1012.9.
(c) All decisions granting or denying
a Touhy Request must be in writing. The
Executive Director must ask the General
Counsel for advice when preparing the
decision.
(d) Under 28 U.S.C. 1733, Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 44(a)(1), or
comparable State or Tribal law, a
request for an authenticated copy of a
Presidio Trust record may be granted by
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the person having the legal custody of
the record. If you believe that you have
custody of a record:
(1) Consult the General Counsel to
determine if you can grant a request for
authentication of records; and
(2) Consult the General Counsel
concerning the proper form of the
authentication (as authentication
requirements may vary by jurisdiction).
§ 1012.11 Must I get approval before
testifying as an expert witness other than
on behalf of the United States in a Federal
proceeding in which the United States is a
party or has a direct and substantial
interest?
(a) You must comply with 5 CFR
2635.805(c), which details the
authorization procedure for an
employee to testify as an expert witness,
not on behalf of the United States, in
any proceeding before a court or agency
of the United States in which the United
States is a party or has a direct and
substantial interest. This procedure
means:
(1) You must obtain the written
approval of the Presidio Trust’s General
Counsel;
(2) You must be in an approved leave
status if you testify during duty hours;
and
(3) You must state for the record that
you are appearing as a private
individual and that your testimony does
not represent the official views of the
Presidio Trust.
(b) If you testify as an expert witness
on a matter outside the scope of your
official duties, and which is not covered
by paragraph (a) of this section, you
must comply with 5 CFR 2635.802.
Dated: August 14, 2009.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9–20031 Filed 8–19–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4R–P
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 160 (Thursday, August 20, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42028-42032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20031]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESIDIO TRUST
36 CFR Part 1012
RIN 3212-AA-04
Legal Process: Testimony by Employees and Production of Records
AGENCY: Presidio Trust.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Presidio Trust is publishing as a final rule a regulation,
[[Page 42029]]
limited to the Presidio Trust's organization and management, governing
access to Presidio Trust information and records in connection with
legal proceedings in which neither the United States nor the Presidio
Trust is a party. This final rule establishes guidelines for use in
determining whether Presidio Trust employees (as defined in the final
rule) will provide testimony or records relating to their official
duties. It also establishes procedures for requesters to follow when
making demands on or requests to a Presidio Trust employee for official
documents or to provide testimony. This final rule standardizes the
Presidio Trust's practices, promotes uniformity in decisions, conserves
the ability of the Presidio Trust to conduct official business,
preserves its employee resources, protects confidential information,
provides guidance to requestors, minimizes involvement in matters
unrelated to the Presidio Trust's mission and programs, avoids wasteful
allocation of agency resources and avoids spending public time and
money for private purpose.
DATES: The effective date of the regulation is September 25, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen A. Cook, General Counsel,
Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA
94129-0052. Telephone: 415.561.5300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Presidio Trust, a wholly-owned federal government corporation,
on occasion receives subpoenas and other requests for documents and
requests for Presidio Trust employees (as defined in the final rule) to
provide testimony or evidence in judicial, legislative or
administrative proceedings in which the Presidio Trust is not a party.
Sometimes these subpoenas or requests are for Presidio Trust records
that are exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.
The Presidio Trust also receives requests for Presidio Trust employees
to appear as witnesses and to provide testimony relating to materials
contained in the Presidio Trust's official records or to provide
testimony or information acquired during the performance of the
employees' official duties.
Although many other federal agencies currently have regulations in
place to address these types of requests and the Presidio Trust itself
has rules governing requests for information under the Freedom of
Information Act, the Presidio Trust has not previously adopted
regulations governing subpoenas and other information requests for
document production and testimony of Presidio Trust employees in
judicial, legislative or administrative proceedings in which the
Presidio Trust is not a party. Issues about such requests that have
arisen in recent years warrant adoption of regulations governing their
submission, evaluation and processing. Responding to these requests is
not only burdensome, but may also result in a significant disruption of
a Presidio Trust employee's work schedule, may involve the Presidio
Trust in issues unrelated to its responsibilities and may impede the
Presidio Trust's accomplishment of its budgetary goals. In order to
resolve these issues, many agencies have issued regulations, similar to
this regulation, governing the circumstances and manner for responding
to demands for testimony or for the production of documents.
Establishing uniform procedures for submission, evaluation and response
to such demands will ensure timely notice and will promote centralized
decision making. The United States Supreme Court upheld this type of
regulation in United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462
(1951).
Briefly summarized, the final rule prohibits disclosure of official
records or testimony by the Presidio Trust's employees unless there is
compliance with the rule. The final rule sets out the information that
requesters must provide and the factors that the Presidio Trust will
consider in making determinations in response to requests for testimony
or the production of documents.
This final rule ensures a more efficient use of the Presidio
Trust's resources, minimizes the possibility of involving the Presidio
Trust in issues unrelated to its mission or responsibilities, promotes
uniformity in responding to such subpoenas and similar requests, and
maintains the impartiality of the Presidio Trust in matters that are in
dispute between other parties. It also serves the Presidio Trust's
interest in protecting sensitive, confidential and privileged
information and records that are generated in fulfillment of the
Presidio Trust's responsibilities.
The final rule is internal and procedural rather than substantive.
It does not create a right to obtain official records or the official
testimony of a Presidio Trust employee; nor does it create any
additional right or privilege not already available to the Presidio
Trust to deny any demand or request for testimony or documents. Failure
to comply with the procedures set out in these regulations would be a
basis for denying a demand or request submitted to the Presidio Trust.
This rulemaking is in compliance with the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553) and follows a 30-day comment period. During this
period the Presidio Trust received and considered one comment. This
comment proposed that the scope of the regulation in Section 1012.1 be
amended to exempt suits in which Presidio Trust board members are sued
in their official capacity. The commenter believed that some such suits
would not qualify for treatment under these regulations pursuant to
United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951) and that the
determination of whether the Presidio Trust has a direct and
substantial interest in such suits against Presidio Trust board members
should not be made by the Presidio Trust. The Presidio Trust considered
this comment and believes that because the applicability of these
regulations in any particular proceeding or circumstance is subject to
judicial review, there is adequate assurance that the requirements set
by the Touhy decision or other applicable law will be applied. The
Presidio Trust will continue to review these regulations in the future,
and if it becomes apparent that they should be modified based on
changes in the law or experience with their implementation, then the
Presidio Trust will do so through the rulemaking process.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This final rule, because it is limited to the Presidio Trust's
organization and management, does not fall within the definition of a
``Rule'' under Executive Order 12866 issued September 30, 1993 on
Regulatory Planning and Review. Moreover, this final rule will not have
an annual effect of $100 million or more on the economy nor adversely
affect productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health
or safety, nor State or local governments. This final rule will neither
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency nor raise
new legal or policy issues. This final rule will not alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs
or the rights and obligations of recipients of such programs.
Therefore, it has been determined that this is not an economically
significant rule.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
This final rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, and will not unduly burden
the Federal court system. This final rule has been
[[Page 42030]]
written so as to minimize litigation and provide a clear legal standard
for affected conduct, and has been reviewed carefully to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguities. Additionally, the Presidio Trust has
not identified any State or local laws or regulations that are in
conflict with this regulation or that would impede full implementation
of this final rule. Nonetheless, in the event that such a conflict was
to be identified, the final rule would preempt State or local laws or
regulations found to be in conflict. However, in that case, (1) no
retroactive effect would be given to this final rule; and (2) the final
rule does not require the use of administration proceedings before
parties may file suit in court challenging its provisions.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This final rule conforms with the Federalism principles set out in
Executive Order 13132 and would not impose any compliance costs on the
States; and would not have substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. Therefore, it has been determined that this final rule
does not have federalism implications.
Unfunded Mandates
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2
U.S.C. 1531-1538) as well as Executive Order 12875, the Presidio Trust
has assessed the effects of this final rule on State, local, and Tribal
governments and the private sector. This final rule does not compel the
expenditure of $100 million or more in any one year by any State,
local, or Tribal governments or anyone in the private sector.
Therefore, a statement under section 202 of the Act is not required.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation With Indian Tribal Governments
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175 of November 6, 2000, the Presidio
Trust has assessed the impact of this final rule on Indian Tribal
governments and has determined that the final rule does not
significantly or uniquely affect communities of Indian Tribal
governments. The Presidio Trust has also determined that this final
rule does not impose substantial direct compliance costs or Tribal
implications on Indian tribal governments, and therefore advance
consultation with Tribes is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 13272--Consideration of
Small Entities
This final rule has been considered in light of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602 et seq.) and Executive Order 13272 of
August 13, 2002. This final rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and Executive Order 13272, because the final rule will
not impose recordkeeping requirements on them; it will not affect their
competitive position in relation to large entities; and it will not
affect their cash flow, liquidity or ability to remain in the market.
Certification
The Presidio Trust certifies that this final rule is not expected
to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act or Executive Order 13272.
Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Because this final rule is a rule of
agency organization, procedure or practice that does not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties it is not a
``Rule'' as defined by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C)) and is not subject to it.
Executive Order 13211--Energy Effects
This final rule is not a ``significant energy action'' as defined
in Executive Order 13211 of May 22, 2001, because it is not likely to
have a significant adverse affect on the supply, distribution or use of
energy. The Presidio Trust has determined that this final rule is not
likely to have any adverse energy effects.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no paperwork burdens or information
collection requirements that are subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Presidio Trust has analyzed this final rule in accordance with
the criteria of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and
determined that the rule does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental
impact statement is required.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act
The Presidio Trust is committed to compliance with the Government
Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires Government agencies to
provide the public the option of submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum extent possible. This final rule
contains no paperwork burdens or information collection requirements,
and is thus in compliance with the GPEA.
Executive Order 12630--No Takings Implication
This final rule has been analyzed in accordance with the principles
of and criteria contained in Executive Order 12630 issued March 15,
1988, and it has been determined that the final rule does not pose a
risk of a taking of constitutionally protected private property.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Presidio Trust amends
chapter X of title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
0
A new part 1012, consisting of Sec. 1012.1 through Sec. 1012.11, is
added to chapter X to read as follows:
PART 1012--LEGAL PROCESS: TESTIMONY BY EMPLOYEES AND PRODUCTION OF
RECORDS
General Information
Sec.
1012.1 What does this part cover?
1012.2 What is the Presidio Trust's policy on granting requests for
employee testimony or Presidio Trust records?
Responsibilities of Requesters
1012.3 How can I obtain employee testimony or Presidio Trust
records?
1012.4 If I serve a subpoena duces tecum, must I also submit a Touhy
Request?
1012.5 What information must I put in my Touhy Request?
1012.6 How much will I be charged?
1012.7 Can I get an authenticated copy of a Presidio Trust record?
Responsibilities of the Presidio Trust
1012.8 How will the Presidio Trust process my Touhy Request?
1012.9 What criteria will the Presidio Trust consider in responding
to my Touhy Request?
Responsibilities of Employees
1012.10 What must I, as an employee, do upon receiving a request?
[[Page 42031]]
1012.11 Must I get approval before testifying as an expert witness
other than on behalf of the United States in a Federal proceeding in
which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial
interest?
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix; 40 U.S.C. 102; 44 U.S.C.
2901 and 3102.
General Information
Sec. 1012.1 What does this part cover?
(a) This part describes how the Presidio Trust responds to requests
or subpoenas for:
(1) Testimony by employees in State, territorial or Tribal
judicial, legislative or administrative proceedings concerning
information acquired while performing official duties or because of an
employee's official status;
(2) Testimony by employees in Federal court civil proceedings in
which the United States or the Presidio Trust is not a party concerning
information acquired while performing official duties or because of an
employee's official status;
(3) Testimony by employees in any judicial or administrative
proceeding in which the United States or the Presidio Trust, while not
a party, has a direct and substantial interest;
(4) Official records or certification of such records for use in
Federal, State, territorial or Tribal judicial, legislative or
administrative proceedings.
(b) In this part, ``employee'' means a current or former Presidio
Trust employee, or Board member, including a contractor or special
government employee, except as the Presidio Trust may otherwise
determine in a particular case.
(c) This part does not apply to:
(1) Congressional requests or subpoenas for testimony or records;
(2) Federal court civil proceedings in which the United States or
the Presidio Trust is a party;
(3) Federal administrative proceedings;
(4) Federal, State and Tribal criminal court proceedings;
(5) Employees who voluntarily testify, while on their own time or
in approved leave status, as private citizens as to facts or events
that are not related to the official business of the Presidio Trust.
The employee must state for the record that the testimony represents
the employee's own views and is not necessarily the official position
of the Presidio Trust. See 5 CFR 2635.702(b), 2635.807(b).
(6) Testimony by employees as expert witnesses on subjects outside
their official duties, except that they must obtain prior approval if
required by Sec. 1012.11.
(d) This part does not affect the rights of any individual or the
procedures for obtaining records under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA), Privacy Act, or statutes governing the certification of
official records. The Presidio Trust FOIA and Privacy Act regulations
are found at parts 1007 and 1008 of this chapter.
(e) Nothing in this part is intended to impede the appropriate
disclosure under applicable laws of Presidio Trust information to
Federal, State, territorial, Tribal, or foreign law enforcement,
prosecutorial, or regulatory agencies.
(f) This part only provides guidance for the internal operations of
the Presidio Trust, and neither creates nor is intended to create any
enforceable right or benefit against the United States or the Presidio
Trust.
Sec. 1012.2 What is the Presidio Trust's policy on granting requests
for employee testimony or Presidio Trust records?
(a) Except for proceedings covered by Sec. 1012.1(c) and (d), it
is the Presidio Trust's general policy not to allow its employees to
testify or to produce Presidio Trust records either upon request or by
subpoena. However, if the party seeking such testimony or records
requests in writing, the Presidio Trust will consider whether to allow
testimony or production of records under this part. The Presidio
Trust's policy ensures the orderly execution of its mission and
programs while not impeding any proceeding inappropriately.
(b) No Presidio Trust employee may testify or produce records in
any proceeding to which this part applies unless authorized by the
Presidio Trust under Sec. Sec. 1012.1 through 1012.11. United States
ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951).
Responsibilities of Requesters
Sec. 1012.3 How can I obtain employee testimony or Presidio Trust
records?
(a) To obtain employee testimony, you must submit:
(1) A written request (hereafter a ``Touhy Request;'' see Sec.
1012.5 and United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951));
and
(2) A statement that you will submit a valid check for costs to the
Presidio Trust, in accordance with Sec. 1012.6, if your Touhy Request
is granted.
(b) To obtain official Presidio Trust records, you must submit:
(1) A Touhy Request; and
(2) A statement that you agree to pay the costs of search and/or
duplication in accordance with the provisions governing requests under
the Freedom of Information Act in part 1007 of this chapter, if your
Touhy Request is granted.
(c) You must send your Touhy Request to both:
(1) The employee; and
(2) The General Counsel of the Presidio Trust.
(d) The address of Presidio Trust employees and the General Counsel
is: Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA
94129-0052.
Sec. 1012.4 If I serve a subpoena duces tecum, must I also submit a
Touhy request?
Yes. If you serve a subpoena for employee testimony or if you serve
a subpoena duces tecum for records in the possession of the Presidio
Trust, you also must submit a Touhy Request.
Sec. 1012.5 What information must I put in my Touhy Request?
Your Touhy Request must:
(a) Identify the employee or record;
(b) Describe the relevance of the desired testimony or records to
your proceeding and provide a copy of the pleadings underlying your
request;
(c) Identify the parties to your proceeding and any known
relationships they have with the Presidio Trust or to its mission or
programs;
(d) Show that the desired testimony or records are not reasonably
available from any other source;
(e) Show that no record could be provided and used in lieu of
employee testimony;
(f) Provide the substance of the testimony expected of the
employee; and
(g) Explain why you believe your Touhy Request meets the criteria
specified in Sec. 1012.9.
Sec. 1012.6 How much will I be charged?
We will charge you the costs, including travel expenses, for
employees to testify under the relevant substantive and procedural laws
and regulations. You must pay costs for record production in accordance
with the provisions governing requests under the Freedom of Information
Act in part 1007 of this chapter. Estimated Costs must be paid in
advance by check or money order payable to the Presidio Trust. Upon
determination of the precise costs, the Presidio Trust will either
reimburse you for any overpayment, or charge you for any underpayment,
which charges must be paid within 10 business days by check or money
order payable to the Presidio Trust.
[[Page 42032]]
Sec. 1012.7 Can I get an authenticated copy of a Presidio Trust
record?
Yes. We may provide an authenticated copy of a Presidio Trust
record, for purposes of admissibility under Federal, State or Tribal
law. We will do this only if the record has been officially released or
would otherwise be released under parts 1007 or 1008 of this chapter,
or this part.
Responsibilities of the Presidio Trust
Sec. 1012.8 How will the Presidio Trust process my Touhy Request?
(a) The Executive Director will decide whether to grant or deny
your Touhy Request. The Presidio Trust's General Counsel, or his or her
agent, may negotiate with you or your attorney to refine or limit both
the timing and content of your Touhy Request. When necessary, the
General Counsel also will coordinate with the Department of Justice to
file appropriate motions, including motions to remove the matter to
Federal court, to quash, or to obtain a protective order.
(b) We will limit the Presidio Trust's decision to allow employee
testimony to the scope of your Touhy Request.
(c) If you fail to follow the requirements of this part, we will
not allow the testimony or produce the records.
(d) If your Touhy Request is complete, we will consider the request
under Sec. 1012.9.
Sec. 1012.9 What criteria will the Presidio Trust consider in
responding to my Touhy Request?
In deciding whether to grant your Touhy Request, the Executive
Director will consider:
(a) Your ability to obtain the testimony or records from another
source;
(b) The appropriateness of the employee testimony and record
production under the relevant regulations of procedure and substantive
law, including the FOIA or the Privacy Act; and
(c) The Presidio Trust's ability to:
(1) Conduct its official business unimpeded;
(2) Maintain impartiality in conducting its business;
(3) Minimize the possibility that the Presidio Trust will become
involved in issues that are not related to its mission or programs;
(4) Avoid spending public employees' time for private purposes;
(5) Avoid any negative cumulative effect of granting similar
requests;
(6) Ensure that privileged or protected matters remain
confidential; and
(7) Avoid undue burden on the Presidio Trust.
Responsibilities of Employees
Sec. 1012.10 What must I, as an employee, do upon receiving a
request?
(a) If you receive a request or subpoena that does not include a
Touhy Request, you must immediately notify your supervisor and the
Presidio Trust's General Counsel for assistance in issuing the proper
response.
(b) If you receive a Touhy Request, you must promptly notify your
supervisor and forward the request to the General Counsel. After
consulting with the General Counsel, the Executive Director will decide
whether to grant the Touhy Request under Sec. 1012.9.
(c) All decisions granting or denying a Touhy Request must be in
writing. The Executive Director must ask the General Counsel for advice
when preparing the decision.
(d) Under 28 U.S.C. 1733, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44(a)(1),
or comparable State or Tribal law, a request for an authenticated copy
of a Presidio Trust record may be granted by the person having the
legal custody of the record. If you believe that you have custody of a
record:
(1) Consult the General Counsel to determine if you can grant a
request for authentication of records; and
(2) Consult the General Counsel concerning the proper form of the
authentication (as authentication requirements may vary by
jurisdiction).
Sec. 1012.11 Must I get approval before testifying as an expert
witness other than on behalf of the United States in a Federal
proceeding in which the United States is a party or has a direct and
substantial interest?
(a) You must comply with 5 CFR 2635.805(c), which details the
authorization procedure for an employee to testify as an expert
witness, not on behalf of the United States, in any proceeding before a
court or agency of the United States in which the United States is a
party or has a direct and substantial interest. This procedure means:
(1) You must obtain the written approval of the Presidio Trust's
General Counsel;
(2) You must be in an approved leave status if you testify during
duty hours; and
(3) You must state for the record that you are appearing as a
private individual and that your testimony does not represent the
official views of the Presidio Trust.
(b) If you testify as an expert witness on a matter outside the
scope of your official duties, and which is not covered by paragraph
(a) of this section, you must comply with 5 CFR 2635.802.
Dated: August 14, 2009.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-20031 Filed 8-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P