Revisions to the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Program Regulations and Implementation Regulations for the Community Trade Adjustment Assistance Program, 41592-41603 [E9-19774]
Download as PDF
41592
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
d. In paragraph (a)(4), remove the
word ‘‘nonmovable’’ and add, in its
place, the words ‘‘non-movable or nonsalable’’,
■ e. In paragraph (a)(5), introductory
text, second sentence, remove the word
‘‘shall’’ and add, in its place, the word
‘‘will’’,
■ f. In paragraph (b)(1) remove the word
‘‘shall’’ both times it appears and add,
in its place, the word ‘‘must’’,
■ g. In paragraph (b)(2), remove the
word ‘‘shall’’ and add, in its place, the
word ‘‘will’’,
■ h. In paragraph (c), second sentence,
remove the word ‘‘shall’’ both times it
appears and add, in its place, the word
‘‘must’’ and remove the word
‘‘borrowers’’ and add, in its place, the
word ‘‘borrower’s’’
■ i. Redesignate paragraph (d) as
paragraph (e),
■ j. Add new paragraph (d) to read as set
forth below, and
■ k. In redesignated paragraph (e)
remove the word ‘‘shall’’ and add, in its
place, the word ‘‘will’’.
■
§ 1436.16 Foreclosure, liquidation,
assumptions, sales or conveyance, or
bankruptcy.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If any significant changes are made
to the legal or operating status of the
farming operation with an outstanding
Farm Storage Facility Loan, the
borrower must do one of the following:
(1) Find an eligible borrower or entity
to assume the loan as specified in
paragraph (b) of this section,
(2) Repay the loan, or
(3) Undergo new financial analysis, as
approved and determined by CCC, to
ensure CCC’s interests are protected and
that the current borrower is in a position
to continue making the scheduled loan
payments.
*
*
*
*
*
1436.19
[Amended]
18. Amend § 1436.19 as follows:
a. In paragraph (a), first sentence, by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding,
in its place, the word ‘‘will’’ and by
adding the sentence ‘‘FSFL borrowers
are subject to the nondiscrimination
provisions applicable to Federally
assisted programs contained in 7 CFR
parts 15 and 15b.’’ at the end and
■ b. In paragraph (b), by removing the
words ‘‘national origin, sex, marital
status, or’’ and adding, in their place,
the words ‘‘national origin, disability,
sex, marital status, familial status,
parental status, sexual orientation,
genetic information, political beliefs,
reprisal, or’’ and by adding at the end
the sentence ‘‘FSFL is subject to the
nondiscrimination provisions
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
■
■
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
applicable to Federally conducted
programs contained in 7 CFR parts 15d
and 15e.’’
Signed in Washington, DC, on August 11,
2009.
Jonathan W. Coppess,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation and Administrator, Farm Service
Agency.
[FR Doc. E9–19652 Filed 8–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
13 CFR Parts 313 and 315
[Docket No. 090429810–91212–02]
RIN 0610–AA65
Revisions to the Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Firms Program
Regulations and Implementation
Regulations for the Community Trade
Adjustment Assistance Program
AGENCY: Economic Development
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: On May 5, 2009, the
Economic Development Administration
(‘EDA’) published a notice of proposed
rulemaking to reflect the amendments
made to the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, by the Trade and
Globalization Adjustment Assistance
Act of 2009 (‘TGAAA’), which was
included as subtitle I within the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009. The notice of proposed
rulemaking provided a public comment
period from May 5, 2009 through June
4, 2009. The TGAAA provides that the
Secretary of Commerce must establish
the Community Trade Adjustment
Assistance Program by August 1, 2009,
under which EDA would provide
technical assistance under section 274
of the Trade Act to communities
impacted by trade to facilitate the
economic adjustment of those
communities. The TGAAA amendments
to the Trade Act took effect on May 17,
2009, 90 days after enactment. As a
result of the enactment of the TGAAA,
EDA promulgates this final rule to
provide regulations to implement the
Community Trade Adjustment
Assistance Program and makes specific
changes to the Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Firms Program
regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective as of August
18, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jamie Lipsey, Attorney Advisor, Office
of Chief Counsel, Economic
Development Administration,
Department of Commerce, Room 7005,
1401 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4687.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
EDA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (the ‘NPRM’) in the Federal
Register (74 FR 20647) on May 5, 2009.
The NPRM reflects the amendments
made to the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2341 et seq.) (the
‘Trade Act’), by the Trade and
Globalization Adjustment Assistance
Act of 2009 (the ‘TGAAA’), which was
included as subtitle I to the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(Pub. L. 111–5, 123 Stat. 115, at 367).
The TGAAA authorized the Trade
Adjustment Assistance for Communities
(‘Community TAA’) Program and made
amendments to certain provisions
affecting the Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Firms (‘TAAF’) Program,
which EDA currently administers
through a network of 11 Universityaffiliated and non-profit Trade
Adjustment Assistance Centers (each, a
‘TAAC’) located throughout the nation.
This final rule promulgates the
Community TAA Program regulations
and makes specific changes to the TAAF
Program regulations, both of which
implement the amendments to the
Trade Act made by the TGAAA. It also
reflects EDA’s current practices and
policies in administering the TAAF
Program that have evolved since the
promulgation of EDA’s current
regulations. Chapter 3 of title II of the
Trade Act authorizes the TAAF
Program, under which technical
assistance is provided to Firms that
have lost domestic sales and
employment due to increased imports of
similar or competitive goods. Chapter 4
of title II of the Trade Act establishes the
Community TAA Program, which is
designed to help local economies adjust
to changing trade patterns through the
coordination of Federal, State, and local
resources and the creation and
implementation of community-based
development strategies to help address
trade impacts.
Capitalized terms used but not
otherwise defined in this final rule have
the meanings ascribed to them in EDA’s
regulations set out in 13 CFR chapter III
(see, e.g., 13 CFR 300.3, 303.2, 315.2,
and 315.15). A complete discussion of
the changes made to EDA’s regulations
was provided in the NPRM and is not
repeated here.
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Response to Comments
A 31-day public comment period,
from May 5, 2009 through June 4, 2009,
followed the publication of the NPRM.
EDA received a small number of public
comments on different portions of the
NPRM. All comments received, which
were from the Directors of three TAACs,
related to the TAAF Program. EDA did
not receive any comments related to the
Community TAA Program. A summary
of the comments and EDA’s response
are provided below.
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
Section 315.2—Definitions
EDA received one comment from the
Director of the Rocky Mountain TAAC
that stated the following: ‘‘The
definition of ‘Absolutely’ has been
determined by EDA to mean five
percent. This is an arbitrary number that
the TAACs at times have been told is no
longer valid. The intended result is to
only accept firms that are truly
impacted. The actual result is usually
several months’ delay in assistance for
the firm until sales and employment
declines enough to satisfy the five
percent decline. This delay causes
unnecessary hardship to the firm.
‘Absolutely’ should not be defined in
this document, but be determined on a
case-by-case basis, which is customary
with other similar definitions like
‘significant,’ which is purposely not
defined.’’
The proposed revision to the
definition of ‘Decreased Absolutely’
does not in any way alter the meaning
of the term ‘Decreased Absolutely’ or
EDA’s current administration of the
TAAF Program. EDA replaced the word
‘irrespective’ in paragraph (1) with the
word ‘independent’ for increased clarity
and ease of understanding. Although the
NPRM did not propose a revision to the
provision of the definition that the
commenter addresses, EDA has
reviewed the comment and addresses it
here. Requiring a Firm to show at least
a five percent decline in sales and
employment to be eligible for assistance
under the TAAF Program is consistent
with the need to marshal limited TAAF
Program resources. In EDA’s experience,
the five percent minimum threshold
helps to ensure that import-impacted
Firms receive limited program
resources.
However, EDA recognizes that Firms’
situations differ, and there are instances
when an import impact will not
manifest as such a quantifiable decline.
Accordingly, EDA provided case-bycase flexibility in the interim final
regulations published in the Federal
Register on October 22, 2008 (73 FR
62858). In the October 22, 2008 interim
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
final rule, EDA revised the definitions of
Decreased Absolutely and ‘Significant
Number or Proportion of Workers,’
which requires eligible Firms to
demonstrate a workforce decline of at
least five percent, to include the phrase,
‘‘unless EDA determines that these
limitations in a given case would not be
consistent with the purposes of the
Trade Act.’’ This added language
provides for the threshold five percent,
but allows for case-by-case flexibility
when the threshold may be unduly
restrictive. In practice, the revised
definitions have been effective to avoid
unjust denials and efficiently use
limited program financial and staff
resources.
EDA received the following comment
from the Director of the Northwest
TAAC regarding the proposed definition
of ‘Increase in Imports,’ which was
revised to include a discussion of the
type of evidence EDA may consider in
determining whether an Increase in
Imports has occurred in a particular
case. The proposed revision adds the
new requirement from section 1863 of
the TGAAA to permit EDA to determine
that an Increase in Imports exists if
customers accounting for a significant
percentage of the decline in a Firm’s
sales or production certify that their
purchases of imported ‘Like Articles or
Services’ have increased absolutely or
relative to the acquisition of such Like
Articles or Services from suppliers in
the United States. The commenter
stated: ‘‘EDA’s use of the word
‘certification’ in this paragraph on the
definition of Increase in Imports is
confusing. If what is meant is some sort
of ‘writing’ from the customer of the
petitioning firm then EDA is
misconstruing the intent of Congress. To
require such a ‘writing’ from a customer
will make it almost impossible to use
this method to show an increase in
imports. Customers are very reluctant to
admit they are purchasing imports out
of fear there will be some sort of
retribution placed upon them. Congress
did not intend to make certification of
service firms more difficult than
manufacturing firms. (See section 288 of
the Act ‘sense of Congress.’) Since there
are no HTS statistics for service imports,
customer verification will be the
primary method. However, to require a
‘writing’ in order for a customer to
‘certify’ their purchase of imports will
not work. Besides, the petitioning firm,
the petition preparer and the TAAC
director already give their assurance as
to the accuracy and completeness of the
petition.’’
EDA believes that the amendment
made by section 1863 of the TGAAA
requires a written customer certification
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41593
in certain circumstances. The revised
definition of Increase in Imports
implements section 251 of the Trade
Act, as amended by section 1863 of the
TGAAA, to provide that certification by
a Firm’s customers of increased imports
to the Secretary is a method by which
EDA may determine the existence of an
Increase in Imports. Previously, the
method to determine whether an
Increase in Imports had occurred was
left to the Secretary’s discretion, and
EDA used a combination of Harmonized
Tariff Schedule (‘HTS’) data and the
TAAC’s interviews of the Firm’s
customers. This dual information
gathering helps demonstrate import
impacts on two levels: using HTS data
helps show overall import trends in a
manufacturing Firm’s market, while
customer interviews provide
confirmation of trade impacts at the
local level. The HTS comprises a
hierarchical structure that classifies
goods into specific ‘buckets’ using
criteria such as name, use, and material
used in a good’s description. Using HTS
data works well for manufacturing
companies because the goods that are
produced allow such Firms to fit within
a specific HTS ‘bucket,’ and the trend
data can be readily accessed. To
understand the local forces affecting a
Firm, the TAAC interviews the Firm’s
customers.
However, HTS data for a ‘Service
Sector Firm’ is extremely broad and
does not allow for such a snapshot,
which makes it infeasible as a method
to assess import trends for Service
Sector Firms. Other reliable data for
assessing how imports affect service
sector industries do not yet exist to
provide information on import trends
within a given Service Sector Firm’s
market. The TGAAA specifies the
customer certification method to
address this lack of industry data and
provide a reliable method to assess the
import impact(s). The plain meaning of
‘certify’ is to make a formal
acknowledgment, and such certification
must be in writing.
The commenter also expressed
concern that customers will be ‘‘very
reluctant to admit they are purchasing
imports out of fear there will be some
sort of retribution placed on them.’’ As
far as EDA is aware, information
obtained from a Firm’s customers and
others has never been and will not be
used for any other purpose than to make
the required eligibility determinations
in order to certify a Firm under the
TAAF Program.
The commenter noted that a written
certification contravenes the ‘Sense of
Congress’ expressed in the Trade Act, as
amended by the TGAAA. EDA intends
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
41594
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
to apply the provisions of chapter 3 of
the Trade Act with the utmost regard to
Firms, but it also must comply with the
directly expressed requirements of the
TGAAA, which specify customer
certifications to the Secretary. EDA is
construing the provision narrowly and
making its application minimally
burdensome. For example, a customer
certification will be required only to
certify: (i) A manufacturing Firm when
the applicable HTS data does not show
an Increase in Imports; and (ii) Service
Sector Firms until applicable HTS data
become available. Also, EDA will accept
customer certifications by email.
Finally, the commenter indicated that
requiring customer certification is
redundant since the Firm and the TAAC
already certify to the accuracy and
completeness of a petition. EDA notes
that this requirement comes directly
from the statute, as section 1863 of the
TGAAA specifies that ‘‘customers
accounting for a significant percentage
of the decrease in the sales or
production of the firm’’ must ‘‘certify to
the Secretary that such customers have
increased their imports of such articles
or services from a foreign country.’’
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
Section 315.6—Firm Eligibility for
Adjustment Assistance
EDA received one comment from the
Director of the Midwest TAAC
requesting clarification on existing Firm
matching share requirements as set out
in section 315.6(c)(2)(i). The comment
states the following: ‘‘Does section
315.6(b)(2)(i) remove the $150,000 cap
on total AP requests?’’
The NPRM did not propose changes
to this provision, however, EDA
reviewed and addresses the question
here. After a Firm is certified as eligible
for assistance under the TAAF Program,
the Firm must develop an EDAapproved Adjustment Proposal, which
is a strategy document designed to map
out a path for the Firm’s recovery. In an
effort to marshal limited resources,
EDA’s general policy is to limit the
amount of Federal assistance provided
under the Adjustment Proposal to
$150,000, which consists of $75,000 in
EDA funds and $75,000 in Firm
matching funds. EDA does not
contemplate raising the $150,000 cap at
this time.
Section 315.7—Certification
Requirements
EDA received one comment from the
Director of the Rocky Mountain TAAC
on the existing interim sales or
production decline Firm certification
option, which was relocated, but not
substantively amended by the NPRM
and is set out in section 315.7(4). The
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
comment stated: ‘‘The six month
interim decline is useful, but not
responsive enough to deal with a firm
facing a rapid decline. A three month
interim decline would provide for more
timely assistance, and minimize
unnecessary hardship to the firm.’’
The NPRM did not propose a revision
to this provision, however, EDA has
reviewed and addresses the comment in
this final rule. EDA assumes that the
commenter is referring to the interim
sales or production and employment
decline certification options in EDA’s
current regulations, which allow a Firm
to pursue certification without at least a
year of data showing sales or production
and employment decline. The interim
decline options are a regulatory rule;
they are not statute-based. The addition
of the interim decline options to the
TAAF Program regulations was based
on EDA’s interpretation of the Trade
Act’s language and intent regarding the
threat of employment separation and
the need to provide proactive assistance.
EDA extrapolated that since the Trade
Act also focuses on the threat of harm,
if a Firm can show a precipitous decline
over six months, then it is a reasonable
assumption that the pattern may
continue.
Although the interim decline options
are not statute-derived, Congress has
consistently appropriated the TAAF
Program with those options in place.
EDA does not believe that three months
provide enough data to reasonably
foresee a sales or production and
employment decline, and does not
believe cutting the interim decline
options in half to three months will
provide optimal program results.
Section 315.8—Processing Petitions for
Certifications
EDA received two similar comments
from the Directors of the Rocky
Mountain and Northwest TAACs on the
proposed revision to section 315.8,
which provides that EDA has 40 days
instead of 60 days from the date EDA
accepts a petition to make a certification
determination to implement section
251(d) of the Trade Act, as amended by
section 1867 of the TGAAA. The
commenters stated: ‘‘This section
should contain a maximum number of
days from receipt of a petition by EDA
to ‘accept’ the petition for processing.
To allow EDA an unlimited time to
‘accept’ a petition defeats the intent of
Congress to only allow 40 days for EDA
to make a determination to certify or
reject the petition. (see section 288 of
Act).’’
In practice, many petitions that are
submitted to EDA are incomplete or
otherwise deficient in some manner.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EDA has allowed and continues to allow
the TAACs to informally submit a
petition and works with the TAAC to
resolve any deficiencies. After all
deficiencies have been resolved, EDA
accepts the petition, which starts the
certification determination clock. EDA
believes that automatically accepting all
petitions will result in a higher rate of
petition denials. Once a petition has
been denied, the petitioning Firm must
wait for one year from the date of denial
before re-applying. Although EDA may
waive the one-year limitation for good
cause, EDA believes that the flexibility
of the current system best serves the
interests of Firms. This flexibility allows
EDA to more effectively achieve the
Congressional intent, which is to assist
trade-impacted Firms with a minimum
of delay and administrative burden.
Firms likely to suffer the greatest tradeinduced stress may have difficulty
responding expeditiously to requests for
clarification or to provide
documentation and are most likely to
exceed a hard and fast 40-day limit. The
new regulations should not impose new
response demands on already stressed
Firms.
Section 315.10—Loss of Certification
Benefits
EDA received the following comment
from the Director of the Northwest
TAAC on proposed section 315.10(d),
which was revised to reflect EDA’s
current practice that a Certified Firm
has five, not two, years from the date
upon which EDA approves an
Adjustment Proposal to complete work
on the Adjustment Proposal: ‘‘There
should be a subpart ‘(e)’. This subpart
(e) should state a firm has five years
from the date their AP is approved to
complete all parts of the
implementation as found within its AP,
without approval from EDA for going
beyond this five year period to
implement all aspects of the approved
AP. This would put these regulations in
compliance with what is actually
occurring at the present time.’’
EDA believes that the proposed
revision reflects current practice and
that another subpart is not necessary.
Changes From the NPRM
After publication of the NPRM, EDA
discovered that the proposed revisions
to the Firms’ 24- or 36-month sales
decline certification requirements, set
out in section 315.7(b)(2) and (3), do not
reflect the ‘average annual’ language as
provided in section 251 of the Trade
Act, as amended by section 1862 of the
TGAAA. Therefore, in this final rule,
EDA revises section 315.7 to include the
‘average annual’ language, thereby
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
succeeding and nullifying the revision
proposed in the NPRM.
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
Classification
Prior notice and opportunity for
public comment are not required for
rules concerning public property, loans,
grants, benefits, and contracts (5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2)). In the alternative, EDA finds
good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to
waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness.
EDA is required by the Trade and
Globalization Adjustment Assistance
Act of 2009, which was included as
subtitle I within the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L.
111–5, 123 Stat. 115, at 401), to
implement these regulations by August
1, 2009. If this rulemaking was delayed
to allow for a 30-day delay in
effectiveness, EDA would not be able to
meet its statutory requirement.
Therefore, in order to make these
regulations effective before August 1,
2009, EDA waives the 30-day in
effectiveness and makes this rule
effective immediately.
Because prior notice and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, or
any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are
inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis has not been
prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (‘PRA’). In
regard to the Community TAA Program,
the Office of Management and Budget
(‘OMB’) has approved the use of Form
ED–900 (‘Application for Investment
Assistance’) under Control Number
0610–0094. Form SF–424 (‘Application
for Federal Assistance’) is approved
under OMB Control Number 4040–0004.
To estimate burden, EDA examined its
experience with its public works and
economic adjustment assistance
programs, which are authorized under
the Public Works and Economic
Development Act of 1965, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 3121 et seq.) (‘PWEDA’). The
potential demand for programs under
PWEDA is, of course, much greater
because eligibility is based on general
economic distress and is not restricted
to trade impact. EDA estimates that
demand from trade-impacted areas
would constitute a small fraction of all
areas experiencing economic distress.
Nonetheless, to a certain extent, demand
will be elastic depending on the amount
of appropriations Congress and the
President approve for the Community
TAA Program. Because the respondent
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
burden will be similar for applications
under the Community TAA Program as
it is for applications under EDA’s
traditional programs, if the Community
TAA Program is funded at its authorized
level of $150,000,000, EDA estimates
that it may receive about 350 responses
for a petition for affirmative
determination and 300 responses for an
implementation grant. EDA estimates
that the total annual paperwork burden
for a petition for affirmative
determination would be about 550
hours and the total annual paperwork
burden for an implementation grant
application would be about 6,500 hours.
In regard to the TAAF Program, the use
of Form ED–840P (‘Petition by a Firm
for Certification of Eligibility to Apply
for Trade Adjustment Assistance’) has
been approved by OMB under Control
Number 0610–0091. In light of the
expansion of the TAAF Program to
Service Sector Firms and the expansion
of the ‘look back’ periods, EDA
estimates the number of respondents
who complete petitions for a
certification of eligibility will increase
more than 100 percent to about 500
respondents and that the total annual
paperwork burden would be about 4,100
hours.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
Executive Order No. 12866
It has been determined that this final
rule is significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Congressional Review Act
This final rule is not ‘major’ under the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.).
Executive Order No. 13132
Executive Order 13132 requires
agencies to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
Executive Order 13132 to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ It has
been determined that this final rule does
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41595
not contain policies that have
federalism implications.
List of Subjects
13 CFR Part 313
Trade adjustment assistance for
communities, Impacted community,
Petition and affirmative determination
requirements, Strategic plan,
Implementation grant.
13 CFR Part 315
Administrative practice and
procedure, Trade adjustment assistance,
Eligible petitioner, Firm selection,
Certification requirements,
Recordkeeping and audit requirements,
Adjustment proposals.
Regulatory Text
For reasons stated in the preamble,
EDA amends chapter III of title 13 of the
Code of Federal Regulations to add new
part 313 and to amend part 315 as
follows:
■ 1. Add part 313 to read as follows:
■
PART 313—COMMUNITY TRADE
ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE
Subpart A—General Provisions
Sec.
313.1 Purpose and scope.
313.2 Definitions.
Subpart B—Participation in the Community
Trade Adjustment Assistance Program
313.3 Overview of Community Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
313.4 Affirmative determinations.
313.5 Technical assistance.
313.6 Strategic Plans.
313.7 Implementation grants for Impacted
Communities.
313.8 Competitive process.
Subpart C—Administrative Provisions
313.9 Records.
313.10 Conflicts of interest.
313.11 Other requirements.
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 2341 et seq., as
amended by Division B, Title I, Subtitle I,
Part II of Pub. L. 111–5; 42 U.S.C. 3211;
Department of Commerce Organizational
Order 10–4.
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 313.1
Purpose and scope.
The regulations in this part set forth
the responsibilities of the Secretary of
Commerce under chapter 4 of title II of
the Trade Act concerning Community
Trade Adjustment Assistance
(‘Community TAA’). The Community
TAA Program is designed to assist
Communities impacted by trade with
economic adjustment through the
coordination of Federal, State, and local
resources, the creation of communitybased development strategies, and the
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
41596
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
development and provision of programs
that meet the training needs of workers.
The statutory authority and
responsibilities of the Secretary of
Commerce relating to Community TAA
are delegated to EDA. EDA certifies
Communities as eligible to apply for
assistance under the Community TAA
Program, provides technical assistance
to Impacted Communities, and provides
implementation assistance to Impacted
Communities in preparing and carrying
out Strategic Plans.
§ 313.2
Definitions.
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
In addition to the defined terms set
forth in § 300.3 of this chapter, the terms
used in this part shall have the
following meanings:
Agricultural Commodity Producer has
the same meaning given to that term in
title II, chapter 6, section 291 of the
Trade Act.
Community Adjustment Assistance
means technical and implementation
assistance provided to an Impacted
Community under chapter 4 of title II of
the Trade Act.
Community means a city, county, or
other political subdivision of a State or
a consortium of political subdivisions of
a State.
Cognizable Certification means a
certification:
(1) By the Secretary of Labor that a
group of workers in the Community is
eligible to apply for assistance under
chapter 2, section 223 of the Trade Act;
(2) By the Secretary of Commerce that
a Certified Firm (as defined at § 315.2 of
this chapter) located in the Community
is eligible to apply for Adjustment
Assistance in accordance with chapter
3, sections 251–253 of the Trade Act; or
(3) By the Secretary of Agriculture
that a group of Agricultural Commodity
Producers in the Community is eligible
to apply for assistance under chapter 6,
section 293 of the Trade Act.
Impacted Community means a
Community that is affected by trade to
such a degree that the Secretary has
made an affirmative determination that
it is eligible to apply for assistance
under this part.
Strategic Plan means an Impacted
Community’s plan for improving its
economic situation developed in
accordance with § 313.6.
Subpart B—Participation in the
Community Trade Adjustment
Assistance Program
§ 313.3 Overview of Community Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
The Community TAA Program is
designed to assist Communities
impacted by trade to adjust to that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
impact. The Community TAA Program
will be administered in accordance with
the following process:
(a) Determination of eligibility. First,
EDA must make an affirmative
determination that the Community is
impacted by trade in accordance with
§ 313.4.
(b) Provision of technical assistance.
After an affirmative determination is
made, EDA will provide the Impacted
Community with technical assistance in
accordance with § 313.5.
(c) Strategic Plan development. An
Impacted Community that intends to
apply for an implementation grant in
accordance with § 313.7 must develop,
in accordance with § 313.6, an EDAapproved Strategic Plan.
(d) Implementation grant. In
accordance with § 313.7, EDA may
award an implementation grant to assist
an Impacted Community in carrying out
a project or program included in a
Strategic Plan.
§ 313.4
Affirmative determinations.
(a) General. Subject to the availability
of funds, a Community may apply for an
affirmative determination if:
(1) On or after August 1, 2009, one or
more Cognizable Certifications are made
with respect to the Community; and
(2) The Community submits the
petition at least 180 days after the date
of the most recent Cognizable
Certification.
(b) Grandfathered Communities. If
one or more Cognizable Certifications
were made with respect to a Community
on or after January 1, 2007, and before
August 1, 2009, the Community may
submit a petition to EDA for an
affirmative determination under this
section not later than February 1, 2010.
(c) Affirmative determination petition
requirements. (1) The Community must
submit a complete petition to the
applicable regional office (or regional
offices in the event the Community
crosses multiple geographic boundaries)
serving the geographic area in which the
Community is located. A complete
petition for an affirmative determination
shall contain the following:
(i) The ‘Application for Federal
Assistance’ (Form SF–424) that contains
such information to allow EDA to
determine that the petitioning
Community is significantly affected by
the threat to, or the loss of, jobs
associated with one or more Cognizable
Certifications;
(ii) The applicable Cognizable
Certification(s) upon which the
Community bases its petition; and
(iii) Such other information as EDA
considers material.
(2) The petition for affirmative
determination must contain information
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
about the impact(s) on the Community
from the actual or threatened loss of jobs
attributable to trade that led to the
applicable Cognizable Certification(s)
made by the Secretaries of Labor,
Commerce or Agriculture, in order for
EDA to determine that the Community
is significantly affected. EDA shall
measure such impact(s) using the
petitioning Community’s most recent
Civilian Labor Force statistics as
reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor,
effective at the time of petition for
affirmative determination. EDA will
obtain the applicable Cognizable
Certification from publicly available
resources. However, a petitioning
Community may also provide copies of
the applicable Cognizable Certification
to EDA.
(d) Notification to Community. Upon
making an affirmative determination,
EDA shall notify promptly the
Community and the Governor of the
State in which the Community is
located of the means for obtaining
assistance under this part and other
appropriate economic assistance that
may be available to the Community.
Such notification will identify the
appropriate EDA regional office that
will provide technical assistance under
§ 313.5.
§ 313.5
Technical assistance.
(a) General. Once EDA has made an
affirmative determination that a
Community is an Impacted Community
and subject to the availability of funds,
EDA shall provide comprehensive
technical assistance to:
(1) Diversify and strengthen the
economy in the Impacted Community;
(2) Identify significant impediments
to economic development that result
from the impact of trade on the
Impacted Community; and
(3) Develop or update a Strategic Plan
in accordance with § 313.6 to address
economic adjustment and workforce
dislocation in the Impacted Community,
including unemployment among
agricultural commodity producers.
(b) Coordination of Federal response.
EDA will coordinate the Federal
response to an Impacted Community by:
(1) Identifying Federal, State, and
local resources that are available to
assist the Impacted Community in
responding to economic distress; and
(2) Assisting the Impacted
Community in accessing available
Federal assistance and ensuring that
such assistance is provided in a
targeted, integrated manner.
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
§ 313.6
Strategic Plans.
(a) General. An Impacted Community
that intends to apply for a grant for
implementation assistance under
§ 313.7 shall develop and submit a
Strategic Plan to EDA for evaluation and
approval. EDA shall evaluate the
Strategic Plan based on the technical
requirements set forth in paragraph (c)
of this section.
(b) Involvement of private and public
entities. To the extent practicable, an
Impacted Community shall consult with
the following entities in developing a
Strategic Plan:
(1) Federal, local, county, or State
government agencies serving the
Impacted Community;
(2) Firms, as defined in § 315.2 of this
chapter, including small- and mediumsized Firms, within the Impacted
Community;
(3) Local workforce investment boards
established under section 117 of the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29
U.S.C. 2832);
(4) Labor organizations, including
State labor federations and labormanagement initiatives, representing
workers in the Impacted Community;
and
(5) Educational institutions, local
educational agencies, or other training
providers serving the Impacted
Community.
(c) Technical requirements. EDA shall
evaluate the Strategic Plan based on the
following minimum requirements:
(1) An analysis of the capacity of the
Impacted Community to achieve
economic adjustment to the impact(s) of
trade;
(2) An analysis of the economic
development challenges and
opportunities facing the Impacted
Community as well as the strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
facing the Impacted Community;
(3) An assessment of the commitment
of the Impacted Community to the
Strategic Plan over the long term and
the participation and input of members
of the Community affected by economic
dislocation, including how the Strategic
Plan will be integrated effectively with
one or more applicable Comprehensive
Economic Development Strategies
(‘CEDS’) that have been developed in
connection with EDA’s economic
development assistance programs as set
out at § 303.7 of this chapter;
(4) A description of the role and the
participation of the entities described in
paragraph (b) of this section in
developing the Strategic Plan;
(5) A description of the projects to be
undertaken by the Impacted Community
under its Strategic Plan and how such
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
projects will facilitate the Impacted
Community’s economic adjustment;
(6) A description of the educational
and training programs available to
workers in the Impacted Community
and the future employment needs of the
Community;
(7) An assessment of the cost of
implementing the Strategic Plan,
including the timing of funding required
by the Impacted Community to
implement the Strategic Plan and the
method of financing to be used to
implement the Strategic Plan; and
(8) A strategy for continuing the
economic adjustment of the Impacted
Community after the completion of the
projects described in paragraph (c)(5) of
this section.
(d) Cost sharing limitation. Assistance
awarded to an Impacted Community to
develop a Strategic Plan under this
section shall not exceed 75 percent of
the cost of developing the Strategic
Plan. In order to provide funding to as
many merit-worthy Impacted
Communities as feasible, EDA may base
the amount of the Community’s
required share on the relative distress
caused by the actual or threatened
decline in the most recent Civilian
Labor Force statistics effective on the
date EDA receives an application to
develop a Strategic Plan.
§ 313.7 Implementation grants for
Impacted Communities.
(a) General. EDA may provide
assistance in the form of a grant under
this section to an Impacted Community
to help the Community carry out a
project or program that is included in a
Strategic Plan developed in accordance
with § 313.6. Such assistance may
include:
(1) Infrastructure improvements, such
as site acquisition, site preparation,
construction, rehabilitation and
equipping of facilities;
(2) Market or industry research and
analysis;
(3) Technical assistance, including
organizational development such as
business networking, restructuring or
improving the delivery of business
services, or feasibility studies;
(4) Public services;
(5) Training; and
(6) Other activities justified by the
Strategic Plan that satisfy applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements.
(b) Application evaluation criteria. (1)
An Impacted Community that seeks to
receive an implementation grant under
this section shall submit a completed
‘Application for Federal Assistance’
(Form ED–900 or any successor form) to
the applicable regional office (or
regional offices in the event the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41597
Community crosses multiple geographic
boundaries) serving the geographic area
in which the Community is located. A
complete application also shall include:
(i) The EDA-approved Strategic Plan
that meets the requirements of § 313.6;
and
(ii) A description of the project or
program included in the Strategic Plan
with respect to which the Impacted
Community seeks assistance.
(2) EDA will evaluate all applications
for the feasibility of the budget
presented and conformance with
statutory and regulatory requirements.
EDA also will consider the degree to
which an implementation grant in the
Impacted Community will satisfy the
evaluation criteria set forth in the
applicable FFO announcement.
(c) Coordination among grant
programs. If an entity in an Impacted
Community seeks or plans to seek a
Community College and Career Training
Grant under section 278 of the Trade
Act or a Sector Partnership Grant under
section 279A of the Trade Act while the
Impacted Community seeks assistance
under this section, the Impacted
Community shall include in the
application for assistance a description
of how the Impacted Community will
integrate any projects or programs
carried out using assistance provided
under this section with any projects or
programs that may be implemented with
other Federal assistance.
(d) Cost sharing requirement. (1) If an
Impacted Community is awarded an
implementation grant under this
section, the following requirements
shall apply:
(i) Federal share. The Federal share of
a project or program for which a grant
is awarded may not exceed 95 percent
of the cost of implementing the project
or program; and
(ii) Community’s share. The Impacted
Community must contribute at least five
percent of the amount of the
implementation grant towards the cost
of implementing the project or program
for which the grant is awarded.
(2) In order to provide funding to as
many merit-worthy Impacted
Communities as feasible, EDA may base
the amount of the Community’s
required share on the relative distress
caused by the actual or threatened
decline in the most recent Civilian
Labor Force statistics effective on the
date EDA receives an application for an
implementation grant.
(e) Limitation. An Impacted
Community may not be awarded more
than $5,000,000 in implementation
grant assistance under this section.
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
41598
§ 313.8
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Competitive process.
(a) Applications for assistance to
develop a Strategic Plan or for an
implementation grant shall be reviewed
by EDA in accord with a competitive
process as set forth in the applicable
FFO, to ensure that EDA awards funds
to the most merit-worthy projects.
(b) Priority for grants to small- and
medium-sized Communities. EDA shall
give priority to an application submitted
under this part by an Impacted
Community that is a small- or mediumsized Community.
(c) Supplement, not supplant. The
Community TAA Program and any
funds appropriated to implement its
provisions shall be used to supplement
and not supplant other Federal, State,
and local public funds expended to
provide economic development
assistance for Communities.
Subpart C—Administrative Provisions
§ 313.9
Records.
Communities that receive assistance
under this part are subject to the records
requirements set out in § 302.14 of this
chapter.
§ 313.10
Conflicts of interest.
Communities that receive assistance
under this part are subject to the
conflicts of interest provisions as set out
in § 302.17 of this chapter.
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
§ 313.11
Other requirements.
2. Revise part 315 to read as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Subpart A—General Provisions
Sec.
315.1 Purpose and scope.
315.2 Definitions.
315.3 Confidential Business Information.
315.4 Eligible applicants.
315.5 TAAC scope, selection, evaluation
and awards.
315.6 Firm eligibility for Adjustment
Assistance.
Subpart B—Certification of Firms
315.7 Certification requirements.
315.8 Processing petitions for certification.
315.9 Hearings.
315.10 Loss of certification benefits.
315.11 Appeals, final determinations and
termination of certification.
Subpart C—Protective Provisions
315.12 Recordkeeping.
315.13 Audit and examination.
315.14 Certifications.
315.15 Conflicts of interest.
Subpart D—Adjustment Proposals
315.16 Adjustment proposal requirements.
Subpart E—Assistance to Industries
315.17 Assistance to Firms in importimpacted industries.
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 2341 et seq., as
amended by Division B, Title I, Subtitle I,
Part II of Pub. L. 111–5; 42 U.S.C. 3211;
Department of Commerce Organization Order
10–4.
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 315.1
Communities that receive assistance
under this part are subject to the general
terms and conditions for Investment
Assistance set out in part 302 of this
chapter relating to requirements
involving the environment (§ 302.1);
post-disaster assistance (§ 302.2); public
information (§ 302.4); relocation
assistance and land acquisition
(§ 302.5); Federal policies and
procedures (§ 302.6); amendments and
changes to awards (§ 302.7); preapproval costs (§ 302.8);
intergovernmental project reviews
(§ 302.9); attorneys’ and consultants’
fees or the employment of expediters
(§ 302.10); EDA’s economic
development information clearinghouse
(§ 302.11); project administration,
operation, and maintenance (§ 302.12);
post-approval requirements (§ 302.18);
indemnification (§ 302.19); and civil
rights (§ 302.20). In addition, any
Property (defined at § 314.1) acquired in
connection with Investment Assistance
is subject to the property management
regulations set out in part 314 of this
chapter.
■
PART 315—TRADE ADJUSTMENT
ASSISTANCE FOR FIRMS
Jkt 217001
Purpose and scope.
The regulations in this part set forth
the responsibilities of the Secretary of
Commerce under chapter 3 of title II of
the Trade Act concerning Trade
Adjustment Assistance for Firms. The
statutory authority and responsibilities
of the Secretary of Commerce relating to
Adjustment Assistance are delegated to
EDA. EDA certifies Firms as eligible to
apply for Adjustment Assistance,
provides technical Adjustment
Assistance to Firms and other
recipients, and provides assistance to
organizations representing trade injured
industries.
§ 315.2
Definitions.
In addition to the defined terms set
forth in § 300.3 of this chapter, the
following terms used in this part shall
have the following meanings:
Adjustment Assistance means
technical assistance provided to Firms
or industries under chapter 3 of title II
of the Trade Act.
Adjustment Proposal means a
Certified Firm’s plan for improving its
economic situation.
Certified Firm means a Firm which
has been determined by EDA to be
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
eligible to apply for Adjustment
Assistance.
Confidential Business Information
means any information submitted to
EDA or a TAAC by a Firm that concerns
or relates to trade secrets for commercial
or financial purposes, which is exempt
from public disclosure under 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and 15
CFR part 4.
Contributed Importantly, with respect
to an Increase in Imports, refers to a
cause which is important but not
necessarily more important than any
other cause. Imports will not be
considered to have Contributed
Importantly if other factors were so
dominant, acting singly or in
combination, that the worker separation
or threat thereof or decline in sales or
production would have been essentially
the same, irrespective of the influence of
imports.
Decreased Absolutely means a Firm’s
sales or production has declined by a
minimum of five percent relative to its
sales or production during the
applicable prior time period,
(1) Independent of industry or market
fluctuations; and
(2) Relative only to the previous
performance of the Firm, unless EDA
determines that these limitations in a
given case would not be consistent with
the purposes of the Trade Act.
Directly Competitive means imported
articles or services that compete with
and are substantially equivalent for
commercial purposes (i.e., are adapted
for the same function or use and are
essentially interchangeable) as the
Firm’s articles or services. Any Firm
that engages in exploring or drilling for
oil or natural gas, or otherwise produces
oil or natural gas, shall be considered to
be producing articles directly
competitive with imports of oil and
with imports of natural gas.
Firm means an individual
proprietorship, partnership, joint
venture, association, corporation
(includes a development corporation),
business trust, cooperative, trustee in
bankruptcy or receiver under court
decree, and includes fishing,
agricultural or service sector entities
and those which explore, drill or
otherwise produce oil or natural gas.
See also the definition of Service Sector
Firm. Pursuant to section 261 of chapter
3 of title II of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C.
2351), a Firm, together with any
predecessor or successor firm, or any
affiliated firm controlled or
substantially beneficially owned by
substantially the same person, may be
considered a single Firm where
necessary to prevent unjustifiable
benefits. For purposes of receiving
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
benefits under this part, when a Firm
owns or controls other Firms, the Firm
and such other Firms may be considered
a single Firm when they produce or
supply like or Directly Competitive
articles or services or are exerting
essential economic control over one or
more production facilities. Accordingly,
such other Firms may include a(n):
(1) Predecessor—see the following
definition for Successor;
(2) Successor—a newly established
Firm (that has been in business less than
two years) which has purchased
substantially all of the assets of a
previously operating company (or in
some cases a whole distinct division)
(such prior company, unit or division, a
‘Predecessor’) and is able to demonstrate
that it continued the operations of the
Predecessor which has operated as an
autonomous unit, provided that there
were no significant transactions
between the Predecessor unit and any
related parent, subsidiary, or affiliate
that would have affected its past
performance, and that separate records
are available for the Predecessor’s
operations for at least two years before
the petition is submitted. The Successor
Firm must have continued virtually all
of the Predecessor Firm’s operations by
producing the same type of products or
services, in the same plant, utilizing
most of the same machinery and
equipment and most of its former
workers, and the Predecessor Firm must
no longer be in existence;
(3) Affiliate—a company (either
foreign or domestic) controlled or
substantially beneficially owned by
substantially the same person or persons
that own or control the Firm filing the
petition; or
(4) Subsidiary—a company (either
foreign or domestic) that is wholly
owned or effectively controlled by
another company.
Increase in Imports means an increase
of imports of Directly Competitive or
Like Articles or Services with articles
produced or services supplied by such
Firm. EDA may consider as evidence of
an Increase in Imports a certification
from the Firm’s customers that account
for a significant percentage of the Firm’s
decrease in sales or production that they
have increased their purchase of
imports of Directly Competitive or Like
Articles or Services from a foreign
country, either absolutely or relative to
their acquisition of such Like Articles or
Services from suppliers located in the
United States.
Like Articles or Services means any
articles or services, as applicable, which
are substantially identical in their
intrinsic characteristics.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
Partial Separation means, with
respect to any employment in a Firm,
either:
(1) A reduction in an employee’s work
hours to 80 percent or less of the
employee’s average weekly hours during
the year of such reductions as compared
to the preceding year; or
(2) A reduction in the employee’s
weekly wage to 80 percent or less of his/
her average weekly wage during the year
of such reduction as compared to the
preceding year.
Person means an individual,
organization or group.
Record means any of the following:
(1) A petition for certification of
eligibility to qualify for Adjustment
Assistance;
(2) Any supporting information
submitted by a petitioner;
(3) The report of an EDA investigation
with respect to petition; and
(4) Any information developed during
an investigation or in connection with
any public hearing held on a petition.
Service Sector Firm means a Firm
engaged in the business of supplying
services. For purposes of receiving
benefits under this part, when a Service
Sector Firm owns or controls other
Service Sector Firms, the Service Sector
Firm and such other Service Sector
Firms may be considered a single
Service Sector Firm when they furnish
like or Directly Competitive services or
are exerting essential economic control
over one or more servicing facilities.
Such other Service Sector Firm may be
a Predecessor, Successor, Affiliate or
Subsidiary, each as defined in the
definition of Firm.
Significant Number or Proportion of
Workers means five percent of a Firm’s
work force or 50 workers, whichever is
less, unless EDA determines that these
limitations in a given case would not be
consistent with the purposes of the
Trade Act. An individual farmer or
fisherman is considered a Significant
Number or Proportion of Workers.
Substantial Interest means a direct
material economic interest in the
certification or non-certification of the
petitioner.
TAAC means a Trade Adjustment
Assistance Center, as more fully
described in § 315.5.
Threat of Total or Partial Separation
means, with respect to any group of
workers, one or more events or
circumstances clearly demonstrating
that a Total or Partial Separation is
imminent.
Total Separation means, with respect
to any employment in a Firm, the laying
off or termination of employment of an
employee for lack of work.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 315.3
41599
Confidential Business Information.
EDA will follow the procedures set
forth in 15 CFR 4.9 for the submission
of Confidential Business Information.
Submitters should clearly mark and
designate as confidential any
Confidential Business Information.
§ 315.4
Eligible applicants.
(a) The following entities may apply
for assistance to operate a TAAC:
(1) Universities or affiliated
organizations;
(2) States or local governments; or
(3) Non-profit organizations.
(b) For purposes of § 315.17 and to the
extent funds are appropriated to
implement section 265 of the Trade Act,
organizations assisting or representing
industries in which a substantial
number of Firms or workers have been
certified as eligible to apply for
Adjustment Assistance under sections
223 and 251 of the Trade Act, include:
(1) Existing agencies;
(2) Private individuals;
(3) Firms;
(4) Universities;
(5) Institutions;
(6) Associations;
(7) Unions; or
(8) Other non-profit industry
organizations.
§ 315.5 TAAC scope, selection, evaluation
and awards.
(a) TAAC purpose and scope. (1)
TAACs are available to assist Firms in
obtaining Adjustment Assistance in all
50 U.S. States, the District of Columbia
and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
TAACs provide Adjustment Assistance
in accordance with this part either
through their own staffs or by
arrangements with outside consultants.
Information concerning TAACs serving
particular areas may be obtained from
the TAAC Web site at https://
www.taacenters.org or from EDA at
https://www.eda.gov.
(2) Prior to submitting a petition for
Adjustment Assistance to EDA, a Firm
should determine the extent to which a
TAAC can provide the required
Adjustment Assistance. EDA will
provide Adjustment Assistance through
TAACs whenever EDA determines that
such assistance can be provided most
effectively in this manner. Requests for
Adjustment Assistance will normally be
made through TAACs.
(3) A TAAC generally provides
Adjustment Assistance by providing
assistance to a:
(i) Firm in preparing its petition for
eligibility certification; and
(ii) Certified Firm in diagnosing its
strengths and weaknesses, and
developing and implementing an
Adjustment Proposal.
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
41600
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(b) TAAC selection. (1) EDA invites
currently funded TAACs to submit
either new or amended applications,
provided they have performed in a
satisfactory manner and complied with
previous or current conditions in their
Cooperative Agreements with EDA and
contingent upon availability of funds.
Such TAACs shall submit an
application on a form approved by
OMB, as well as a proposed budget,
narrative scope of work, and such other
information as requested by EDA.
Acceptance of an application or
amended application for a Cooperative
Agreement does not ensure funding by
EDA.
(2) EDA may invite new applications
through a Federal Funding Opportunity
(‘FFO’) announcement. An application
will require a narrative scope of work,
proposed budget and such other
information as requested by EDA.
Acceptance of an application does not
ensure funding by EDA.
(c) TAAC evaluation. (1) EDA
generally evaluates currently funded
TAACs based on:
(i) Performance under Cooperative
Agreements with EDA and compliance
with the terms and conditions of such
Cooperative Agreements;
(ii) Proposed scope of work, budget
and application or amended
application; and
(iii) Availability of funds.
(2) EDA generally evaluates new
TAACs based on:
(i) Competence in administering
business assistance programs;
(ii) Background and experience of
staff;
(iii) Proposed scope of work, budget
and application; and
(iv) Availability of funds.
(d) TAAC award requirements. (1)
EDA generally funds a TAAC for a
three-year project period consisting of
three separate funding periods of 12
months each.
(2) There are no matching share
requirements for Adjustment Assistance
provided by the TAACs to Firms for
certification or for administrative
expenses of the TAACs.
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
§ 315.6 Firm eligibility for Adjustment
Assistance.
(a) Firms participate in the Trade
Adjustment Assistance for Firms
program in accordance with the
following:
(1) Firms apply for certification
through a TAAC by completing a
petition for certification. The TAAC will
assist Firms in completing such
petitions (at no cost to the Firms);
(2) Firms certified in accordance with
the procedures described in §§ 315.7
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
and 315.8 must prepare an Adjustment
Proposal for Adjustment Assistance
from the TAAC (‘Adjustment Proposal’)
and submit it to EDA for approval; and
(3) EDA determines whether the
Adjustment Assistance requested in the
Adjustment Proposal is eligible based
upon the evaluation criteria set forth in
subpart D of this part. A Certified Firm
may submit a request to the TAAC for
Adjustment Assistance to implement an
approved Adjustment Proposal.
(b) For certification, EDA evaluates
Firms’ petitions strictly on the basis of
fulfillment of the requirements set forth
in § 315.7.
(c) (1) Certified Firms generally
receive Adjustment Assistance over a
two-year period.
(2) The matching share requirements
are as follows:
(i) Each Certified Firm must pay at
least 25 percent of the cost of preparing
its Adjustment Proposal. Each Certified
Firm requesting $30,000 or less in total
Adjustment Assistance in its approved
Adjustment Proposal must pay at least
25 percent of the cost of that
Adjustment Assistance. Each Certified
Firm requesting more than $30,000 in
total Adjustment Assistance in its
approved Adjustment Proposal must
pay at least 50 percent of the cost of that
Adjustment Assistance.
(ii) Organizations representing tradeinjured industries must pay at least 50
percent of the total cash cost of the
Adjustment Assistance, in addition to
appropriate in-kind contributions.
Subpart B—Certification of Firms
§ 315.7
Certification requirements.
(a) General. EDA may certify a Firm
as eligible to apply for Adjustment
Assistance under section 251(c) of the
Trade Act if it determines that the
petition for certification meets one of
the minimum certification thresholds
set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
In order to be certified, a Firm must
meet the criteria listed under any one of
the 5 circumstances described in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Minimum certification thresholds.
(1) Twelve-month decline. Based upon a
comparison of the most recent 12-month
period for which data are available and
the immediately preceding twelvemonth period:
(i) A Significant Number or
Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or
a Threat of Total or Partial Separation;
(ii) Either sales or production, or both,
of the Firm has Decreased Absolutely; or
sales or production, or both, of any
article or service that accounted for not
less than 25 percent of the total
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
production or sales of the Firm during
the 12-month period preceding the most
recent 12-month period for which data
are available have Decreased
Absolutely; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has
Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or
Threat of Total or Partial Separation,
and to the applicable decline in sales or
production or supply of services.
(2) Twelve-month versus twenty-four
month decline. Based upon a
comparison of the most recent 12-month
period for which data are available and
the immediately preceding 24-month
period:
(i) A Significant Number or
Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or
a Threat of Total or Partial Separation;
(ii) Either average annual sales or
production, or both, of the Firm has
Decreased Absolutely; or average annual
sales or production, or both, of any
article or service that accounted for not
less than 25 percent of the total
production or sales of the Firm during
the 24-month period preceding the most
recent 12-month period for which data
are available have Decreased
Absolutely; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has
Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or
Threat of Total or Partial Separation,
and to the applicable decline in sales or
production or supply of services.
(3) Twelve-month versus thirty-six
month decline. Based upon a
comparison of the most recent 12-month
period for which data are available and
the immediately preceding 36-month
period:
(i) A Significant Number or
Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or
a Threat of Total or Partial Separation;
(ii) Either average annual sales or
production, or both, of the Firm has
Decreased Absolutely; or average annual
sales or production, or both, of any
article or service that accounted for not
less than 25 percent of the total
production or sales of the Firm during
the 36-month period preceding the most
recent 12-month period for which data
are available have Decreased
Absolutely; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has
Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or
Threat of Total or Partial Separation,
and to the applicable decline in sales or
production or supply of services.
(4) Interim sales or production
decline. Based upon an interim sales or
production decline:
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Sales or production has Decreased
Absolutely for, at minimum, the most
recent six-month period during the most
recent 12-month period for which data
are available as compared to the same
six-month period during the
immediately preceding 12-month
period;
(ii) During the same base and
comparative period of time as sales or
production has Decreased Absolutely, a
Significant Number or Proportion of
Workers in such Firm has undergone
Total or Partial Separation or a Threat
of Total or Partial Separation; and
(iii) During the same base and
comparative period of time as sales or
production has Decreased Absolutely,
an Increase in Imports has Contributed
Importantly to the applicable Total or
Partial Separation or Threat of Total or
Partial Separation, and to the applicable
decline in sales or production or supply
of services.
(5) Interim employment decline.
Based upon an interim employment
decline:
(i) A Significant Number or
Proportion of Workers in such Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or
a Threat of Total or Partial Separation
during, at a minimum, the most recent
six-month period during the most recent
12-month period for which data are
available as compared to the same sixmonth period during the immediately
preceding 12-month period; and
(ii) Either sales or production of the
Firm has Decreased Absolutely during
the 12-month period preceding the most
recent 12-month period for which data
are available; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has
Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or
Threat of Total or Partial Separation,
and to the applicable decline in sales or
production or supply of services.
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
§ 315.8 Processing petitions for
certification.
(a) Firms shall consult with a TAAC
for guidance and assistance in the
preparation of their petitions for
certification.
(b) A Firm seeking certification shall
complete a Petition by a Firm for
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (Form
ED–840P or any successor form) with
the following information about such
Firm:
(1) Identification and description of
the Firm, including legal form of
organization, economic history, major
ownership interests, officers, directors,
management, parent company,
Subsidiaries or Affiliates, and
production and sales facilities;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
(2) Description of goods or services
supplied or sold;
(3) Description of imported Directly
Competitive or Like Articles or Services
with those produced or supplied;
(4) Data on its sales, production and
employment for the applicable 24month, 36-month, or 48-month period,
as required under § 315.7(b);
(5) One copy of a complete auditor’s
certified financial report for the entire
period covering the petition, or if not
available, one copy of the complete
profit and loss statements, balance
sheets and supporting statements
prepared by the Firm’s accountants for
the entire period covered by the
petition; publicly-owned corporations
should submit copies of the most recent
Form 10–K annual reports (or Form 10–
Q quarterly reports, as appropriate) filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission for the entire period
covered by the petition;
(6) Information concerning its major
customers and their purchases (or its
bids, if there are no major customers);
and
(7) Such other information as EDA
considers material.
(c) EDA shall determine whether the
petition has been properly prepared and
can be accepted. Promptly thereafter,
EDA shall notify the petitioner that the
petition has been accepted or advise the
TAAC that the petition has not been
accepted, but may be resubmitted at any
time without prejudice when the
specified deficiencies have been
corrected. Any resubmission will be
treated as a new petition.
(d) EDA will publish a notice of
acceptance of a petition in the Federal
Register.
(e) EDA will initiate an investigation
to determine whether the petitioner
meets the requirements set forth in
section 251(c) of the Trade Act and
§ 315.7.
(f) A petitioner may withdraw a
petition for certification if EDA receives
a request for withdrawal before it makes
a certification determination or denial.
A Firm may submit a new petition at
any time thereafter in accordance with
the requirements of this section and
§ 315.7.
(g) Following acceptance of a petition,
EDA will:
(1) Make a determination based on the
Record as soon as possible after the
petitioning Firm or TAAC has submitted
all material. In no event may the
determination period exceed 40 days
from the date on which EDA accepted
the petition; and
(2) Either certify the petitioner as
eligible to apply for Adjustment
Assistance or deny the petition. In
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41601
either event, EDA shall promptly give
written notice of action to the petitioner.
Any written notice to the petitioner of
a denial of a petition shall specify the
reason(s) for the denial. A petitioner
shall not be entitled to resubmit a
petition within one year from the date
of denial, provided, EDA may waive the
one-year limitation for good cause.
§ 315.9
Hearings.
EDA will hold a public hearing on an
accepted petition if the petitioner or any
interested Person found by EDA to have
a Substantial Interest in the proceedings
submits a request for a hearing no later
than 10 days after the date of
publication of the notice of acceptance
in the Federal Register, under the
following procedures:
(a) The petitioner or any interested
Person(s) shall have an opportunity to
be present, to produce evidence and to
be heard;
(b) A request for public hearing must
be delivered by hand or by registered
mail to EDA. A request by a Person
other than the petitioner shall contain:
(1) The name, address and telephone
number of the Person requesting the
hearing; and
(2) A complete statement of the
relationship of the Person requesting the
hearing to the petitioner and the subject
matter of the petition, and a statement
of the nature of its interest in the
proceedings.
(c) If EDA determines that the
requesting party does not have a
Substantial Interest in the proceedings,
a written notice of denial shall be sent
to the requesting party. The notice shall
specify the reasons for the denial;
(d) EDA shall publish a notice of a
public hearing in the Federal Register,
containing the subject matter, name of
petitioner, and date, time and place of
the hearing; and
(e) EDA shall appoint a presiding
officer for the hearing who shall
respond to all procedural questions.
§ 315.10
Loss of certification benefits.
EDA may terminate a Firm’s
certification or refuse to extend
Adjustment Assistance to a Firm for any
of the following reasons:
(a) Failure to submit an acceptable
Adjustment Proposal within two years
after date of certification. While
approval of an Adjustment Proposal
may occur after the expiration of such
two-year period, a Firm must submit an
acceptable Adjustment Proposal before
such expiration;
(b) Failure to submit documentation
necessary to start implementation or
modify its request for Adjustment
Assistance consistent with its
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
41602
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Adjustment Proposal within six months
after approval of the Adjustment
Proposal, where two years have elapsed
since the date of certification. If the
Firm anticipates needing a longer period
to submit documentation, it should
indicate the longer period in its
Adjustment Proposal. If the Firm is
unable to submit its documentation
within the allowed time, it should
notify EDA in writing of the reasons for
the delay and submit a new schedule.
EDA has the discretion to accept or
refuse a new schedule;
(c) EDA has denied the Firm’s request
for Adjustment Assistance, the time
period allowed for the submission of
any documentation in support of such
request has expired, and two years have
elapsed since the date of certification; or
(d) Failure to diligently pursue an
approved Adjustment Proposal where
five years have elapsed since the date of
certification.
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
§ 315.11 Appeals, final determinations and
termination of certification.
(a) Any petitioner may appeal in
writing to EDA from a denial of
certification, provided that EDA
receives the appeal by personal delivery
or by registered mail within 60 days
from the date of notice of denial under
§ 315.8(g). The appeal must state the
grounds on which the appeal is based,
including a concise statement of the
supporting facts and applicable law.
The decision of EDA on the appeal shall
be the final determination within the
Department. In the absence of an appeal
by the petitioner under this paragraph,
the determination under § 315.8(g) shall
be final.
(b) A Firm, its representative or any
other interested domestic party
aggrieved by a final determination
under paragraph (a) of this section may,
within 60 days after notice of such
determination, begin a civil action in
the United States Court of International
Trade for review of such determination,
in accordance with section 284 of the
Trade Act.
(c) Whenever EDA determines that a
Certified Firm no longer requires
Adjustment Assistance or for other good
cause, EDA will terminate the
certification and promptly publish
notice of such termination in the
Federal Register. The termination will
take effect on the date specified in the
published notice.
(d) EDA shall immediately notify the
petitioner and shall state the reasons for
any termination.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
Subpart C—Protective Provisions
§ 315.12
Recordkeeping.
Each TAAC shall keep records that
fully disclose the amount and
disposition of Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Firms program funds so
as to facilitate an effective audit.
§ 315.13
Audit and examination.
EDA and the Comptroller General of
the United States shall have access for
the purpose of audit and examination to
any books, documents, papers, and
records of a Firm, TAAC or other
recipient of Adjustment Assistance
pertaining to the award of Adjustment
Assistance.
§ 315.14
Certifications.
EDA will provide no Adjustment
Assistance to any Firm unless the
owners, partners, members, directors or
officers thereof certify to EDA:
(a) The names of any attorneys,
agents, and other Persons engaged by or
on behalf of the Firm for the purpose of
expediting applications for such
Adjustment Assistance; and
(b) The fees paid or to be paid to any
such Person.
§ 315.15
Conflicts of interest.
EDA will provide no Adjustment
Assistance to any Firm under this part
unless the owners, partners, or officers
execute an agreement binding them and
the Firm for a period of two years after
such Adjustment Assistance is
provided, to refrain from employing,
tendering any office or employment to,
or retaining for professional services any
Person who, on the date such assistance
or any part thereof was provided, or
within one year prior thereto, shall have
served as an officer, attorney, agent, or
employee occupying a position or
engaging in activities which involved
discretion with respect to the provision
of such Adjustment Assistance.
Subpart D—Adjustment Proposals
§ 315.16 Adjustment proposal
requirements.
EDA evaluates Adjustment Proposals
based on the following:
(a) EDA must receive the Adjustment
Proposal within two years after the date
of the certification of the Firm;
(b) The Adjustment Proposal must
include a description of any Adjustment
Assistance requested to implement such
proposal, including financial and other
supporting documentation as EDA
determines is necessary, based upon
either:
(1) An analysis of the Firm’s
problems, strengths and weaknesses and
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
an assessment of its prospects for
recovery; or
(2) If EDA so determines, other
available information;
(c) The Adjustment Proposal must:
(1) Be reasonably calculated to
contribute materially to the economic
adjustment of the Firm (i.e., that such
proposal will constructively assist the
Firm to establish a competitive position
in the same or a different industry);
(2) Give adequate consideration to the
interests of a sufficient number of
separated workers of the Firm, by
providing, for example, that the Firm
will:
(i) Give a rehiring preference to such
workers;
(ii) Make efforts to find new work for
a number of such workers; and
(iii) Assist such workers in obtaining
benefits under available programs; and
(3) Demonstrate that the Firm will
make all reasonable efforts to use its
own resources for its recovery, though
under certain circumstances, resources
of related Firms or major stockholders
will also be considered; and
(d) The Adjustment Assistance
identified in the Adjustment Proposal
must consist of specialized consulting
services designed to assist the Firm in
becoming more competitive in the
global marketplace. For this purpose,
Adjustment Assistance generally
consists of knowledge-based services
such as market penetration studies,
customized business improvements, and
designs for new products. Adjustment
Assistance does not include
expenditures for capital improvements
or for the purchase of business
machinery or supplies.
Subpart E—Assistance to Industries
§ 315.17 Assistance to firms in importimpacted industries.
(a) Whenever the International Trade
Commission makes an affirmative
finding under section 202(B) of the
Trade Act that increased imports are a
substantial cause of serious injury or
threat thereof with respect to an
industry, EDA shall provide to the
Firms in such industry assistance in the
preparation and processing of petitions
and applications for benefits under
programs which may facilitate the
orderly adjustment to import
competition of such Firms.
(b) EDA may provide Adjustment
Assistance, on such terms and
conditions as EDA deems appropriate,
for the establishment of industry-wide
programs for new product development,
new process development, export
development or other uses consistent
with the purposes of the Trade Act and
this part.
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(c) Expenditures for Adjustment
Assistance under this section may be up
to $10,000,000 annually per industry,
subject to availability of funds, and shall
be made under such terms and
conditions as EDA deems appropriate.
Engineer, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1112; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: August 13, 2009.
Dennis Alvord,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of
Commerce for Economic Development.
[FR Doc. E9–19774 Filed 8–17–09; 8:45 am]
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on May 14, 2009 (74 FR 22712).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
BILLING CODE 3510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0447; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–172–AD; Amendment
39–15993; AD 2009–17–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Saab AB,
Saab Aerosystems Model SAAB 340A
(SAAB/SF340A) and SAAB 340B
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
During refueling, the ground crew detected
smoke from the refuel/defuel panel
illuminated placard 160VU. * * *
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
September 22, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of September 22, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
During refueling, the ground crew detected
smoke from the refuel/defuel panel
illuminated placard 160VU. The design of
the refuel/defuel panel illuminated placard
was changed during 1997 from its original
specification, to fill the cavity inside the
placard with silicone to avoid moisture/fluid
ingress. SAAB has reviewed the working
procedure and has developed a placard filled
with a bi-component silicone-based material
to minimize the cavity inside the panels.
For the reasons described above, this EASA
AD requires the identification of the
manufacturing date of the affected placard, a
visual inspection of the placard for heat and/
or burn marks and the installation of a new
placard in accordance with the instructions
of SAAB Service Bulletin (SB) 340–28–027.
This AD has been revised to identify the
affected VIBRACHOC (the part manufacturer)
placard with Part Number (P/N)
C4FL5031C001, instead of the corresponding
SAAB P/N 9303719–001, which was (also)
quoted inaccurately. In addition, it has been
recognised that the original AD did not allow
installation of the placards with a
manufacturing date before 31/97; that has
now been corrected.
The unsafe condition is an electrical
malfunction in the illuminated placard
of the refuel and defuel panel, which
could result in fire. You may obtain
further information by examining the
MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Differences Between this AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41603
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
141 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 2 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost about $1,500
per product. Where the service
information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we
have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be
$234,060, or $1,660 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 18, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41592-41603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19774]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
13 CFR Parts 313 and 315
[Docket No. 090429810-91212-02]
RIN 0610-AA65
Revisions to the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Program
Regulations and Implementation Regulations for the Community Trade
Adjustment Assistance Program
AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On May 5, 2009, the Economic Development Administration
(`EDA') published a notice of proposed rulemaking to reflect the
amendments made to the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, by the Trade and
Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009 (`TGAAA'), which was
included as subtitle I within the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009. The notice of proposed rulemaking provided a public
comment period from May 5, 2009 through June 4, 2009. The TGAAA
provides that the Secretary of Commerce must establish the Community
Trade Adjustment Assistance Program by August 1, 2009, under which EDA
would provide technical assistance under section 274 of the Trade Act
to communities impacted by trade to facilitate the economic adjustment
of those communities. The TGAAA amendments to the Trade Act took effect
on May 17, 2009, 90 days after enactment. As a result of the enactment
of the TGAAA, EDA promulgates this final rule to provide regulations to
implement the Community Trade Adjustment Assistance Program and makes
specific changes to the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Program
regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective as of August 18, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Lipsey, Attorney Advisor, Office
of Chief Counsel, Economic Development Administration, Department of
Commerce, Room 7005, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482-4687.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
EDA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (the `NPRM') in the
Federal Register (74 FR 20647) on May 5, 2009. The NPRM reflects the
amendments made to the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2341 et
seq.) (the `Trade Act'), by the Trade and Globalization Adjustment
Assistance Act of 2009 (the `TGAAA'), which was included as subtitle I
to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5,
123 Stat. 115, at 367). The TGAAA authorized the Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Communities (`Community TAA') Program and made
amendments to certain provisions affecting the Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Firms (`TAAF') Program, which EDA currently administers
through a network of 11 University-affiliated and non-profit Trade
Adjustment Assistance Centers (each, a `TAAC') located throughout the
nation.
This final rule promulgates the Community TAA Program regulations
and makes specific changes to the TAAF Program regulations, both of
which implement the amendments to the Trade Act made by the TGAAA. It
also reflects EDA's current practices and policies in administering the
TAAF Program that have evolved since the promulgation of EDA's current
regulations. Chapter 3 of title II of the Trade Act authorizes the TAAF
Program, under which technical assistance is provided to Firms that
have lost domestic sales and employment due to increased imports of
similar or competitive goods. Chapter 4 of title II of the Trade Act
establishes the Community TAA Program, which is designed to help local
economies adjust to changing trade patterns through the coordination of
Federal, State, and local resources and the creation and implementation
of community-based development strategies to help address trade
impacts.
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this final rule
have the meanings ascribed to them in EDA's regulations set out in 13
CFR chapter III (see, e.g., 13 CFR 300.3, 303.2, 315.2, and 315.15). A
complete discussion of the changes made to EDA's regulations was
provided in the NPRM and is not repeated here.
[[Page 41593]]
Response to Comments
A 31-day public comment period, from May 5, 2009 through June 4,
2009, followed the publication of the NPRM. EDA received a small number
of public comments on different portions of the NPRM. All comments
received, which were from the Directors of three TAACs, related to the
TAAF Program. EDA did not receive any comments related to the Community
TAA Program. A summary of the comments and EDA's response are provided
below.
Section 315.2--Definitions
EDA received one comment from the Director of the Rocky Mountain
TAAC that stated the following: ``The definition of `Absolutely' has
been determined by EDA to mean five percent. This is an arbitrary
number that the TAACs at times have been told is no longer valid. The
intended result is to only accept firms that are truly impacted. The
actual result is usually several months' delay in assistance for the
firm until sales and employment declines enough to satisfy the five
percent decline. This delay causes unnecessary hardship to the firm.
`Absolutely' should not be defined in this document, but be determined
on a case-by-case basis, which is customary with other similar
definitions like `significant,' which is purposely not defined.''
The proposed revision to the definition of `Decreased Absolutely'
does not in any way alter the meaning of the term `Decreased
Absolutely' or EDA's current administration of the TAAF Program. EDA
replaced the word `irrespective' in paragraph (1) with the word
`independent' for increased clarity and ease of understanding. Although
the NPRM did not propose a revision to the provision of the definition
that the commenter addresses, EDA has reviewed the comment and
addresses it here. Requiring a Firm to show at least a five percent
decline in sales and employment to be eligible for assistance under the
TAAF Program is consistent with the need to marshal limited TAAF
Program resources. In EDA's experience, the five percent minimum
threshold helps to ensure that import-impacted Firms receive limited
program resources.
However, EDA recognizes that Firms' situations differ, and there
are instances when an import impact will not manifest as such a
quantifiable decline. Accordingly, EDA provided case-by-case
flexibility in the interim final regulations published in the Federal
Register on October 22, 2008 (73 FR 62858). In the October 22, 2008
interim final rule, EDA revised the definitions of Decreased Absolutely
and `Significant Number or Proportion of Workers,' which requires
eligible Firms to demonstrate a workforce decline of at least five
percent, to include the phrase, ``unless EDA determines that these
limitations in a given case would not be consistent with the purposes
of the Trade Act.'' This added language provides for the threshold five
percent, but allows for case-by-case flexibility when the threshold may
be unduly restrictive. In practice, the revised definitions have been
effective to avoid unjust denials and efficiently use limited program
financial and staff resources.
EDA received the following comment from the Director of the
Northwest TAAC regarding the proposed definition of `Increase in
Imports,' which was revised to include a discussion of the type of
evidence EDA may consider in determining whether an Increase in Imports
has occurred in a particular case. The proposed revision adds the new
requirement from section 1863 of the TGAAA to permit EDA to determine
that an Increase in Imports exists if customers accounting for a
significant percentage of the decline in a Firm's sales or production
certify that their purchases of imported `Like Articles or Services'
have increased absolutely or relative to the acquisition of such Like
Articles or Services from suppliers in the United States. The commenter
stated: ``EDA's use of the word `certification' in this paragraph on
the definition of Increase in Imports is confusing. If what is meant is
some sort of `writing' from the customer of the petitioning firm then
EDA is misconstruing the intent of Congress. To require such a
`writing' from a customer will make it almost impossible to use this
method to show an increase in imports. Customers are very reluctant to
admit they are purchasing imports out of fear there will be some sort
of retribution placed upon them. Congress did not intend to make
certification of service firms more difficult than manufacturing firms.
(See section 288 of the Act `sense of Congress.') Since there are no
HTS statistics for service imports, customer verification will be the
primary method. However, to require a `writing' in order for a customer
to `certify' their purchase of imports will not work. Besides, the
petitioning firm, the petition preparer and the TAAC director already
give their assurance as to the accuracy and completeness of the
petition.''
EDA believes that the amendment made by section 1863 of the TGAAA
requires a written customer certification in certain circumstances. The
revised definition of Increase in Imports implements section 251 of the
Trade Act, as amended by section 1863 of the TGAAA, to provide that
certification by a Firm's customers of increased imports to the
Secretary is a method by which EDA may determine the existence of an
Increase in Imports. Previously, the method to determine whether an
Increase in Imports had occurred was left to the Secretary's
discretion, and EDA used a combination of Harmonized Tariff Schedule
(`HTS') data and the TAAC's interviews of the Firm's customers. This
dual information gathering helps demonstrate import impacts on two
levels: using HTS data helps show overall import trends in a
manufacturing Firm's market, while customer interviews provide
confirmation of trade impacts at the local level. The HTS comprises a
hierarchical structure that classifies goods into specific `buckets'
using criteria such as name, use, and material used in a good's
description. Using HTS data works well for manufacturing companies
because the goods that are produced allow such Firms to fit within a
specific HTS `bucket,' and the trend data can be readily accessed. To
understand the local forces affecting a Firm, the TAAC interviews the
Firm's customers.
However, HTS data for a `Service Sector Firm' is extremely broad
and does not allow for such a snapshot, which makes it infeasible as a
method to assess import trends for Service Sector Firms. Other reliable
data for assessing how imports affect service sector industries do not
yet exist to provide information on import trends within a given
Service Sector Firm's market. The TGAAA specifies the customer
certification method to address this lack of industry data and provide
a reliable method to assess the import impact(s). The plain meaning of
`certify' is to make a formal acknowledgment, and such certification
must be in writing.
The commenter also expressed concern that customers will be ``very
reluctant to admit they are purchasing imports out of fear there will
be some sort of retribution placed on them.'' As far as EDA is aware,
information obtained from a Firm's customers and others has never been
and will not be used for any other purpose than to make the required
eligibility determinations in order to certify a Firm under the TAAF
Program.
The commenter noted that a written certification contravenes the
`Sense of Congress' expressed in the Trade Act, as amended by the
TGAAA. EDA intends
[[Page 41594]]
to apply the provisions of chapter 3 of the Trade Act with the utmost
regard to Firms, but it also must comply with the directly expressed
requirements of the TGAAA, which specify customer certifications to the
Secretary. EDA is construing the provision narrowly and making its
application minimally burdensome. For example, a customer certification
will be required only to certify: (i) A manufacturing Firm when the
applicable HTS data does not show an Increase in Imports; and (ii)
Service Sector Firms until applicable HTS data become available. Also,
EDA will accept customer certifications by email.
Finally, the commenter indicated that requiring customer
certification is redundant since the Firm and the TAAC already certify
to the accuracy and completeness of a petition. EDA notes that this
requirement comes directly from the statute, as section 1863 of the
TGAAA specifies that ``customers accounting for a significant
percentage of the decrease in the sales or production of the firm''
must ``certify to the Secretary that such customers have increased
their imports of such articles or services from a foreign country.''
Section 315.6--Firm Eligibility for Adjustment Assistance
EDA received one comment from the Director of the Midwest TAAC
requesting clarification on existing Firm matching share requirements
as set out in section 315.6(c)(2)(i). The comment states the following:
``Does section 315.6(b)(2)(i) remove the $150,000 cap on total AP
requests?''
The NPRM did not propose changes to this provision, however, EDA
reviewed and addresses the question here. After a Firm is certified as
eligible for assistance under the TAAF Program, the Firm must develop
an EDA-approved Adjustment Proposal, which is a strategy document
designed to map out a path for the Firm's recovery. In an effort to
marshal limited resources, EDA's general policy is to limit the amount
of Federal assistance provided under the Adjustment Proposal to
$150,000, which consists of $75,000 in EDA funds and $75,000 in Firm
matching funds. EDA does not contemplate raising the $150,000 cap at
this time.
Section 315.7--Certification Requirements
EDA received one comment from the Director of the Rocky Mountain
TAAC on the existing interim sales or production decline Firm
certification option, which was relocated, but not substantively
amended by the NPRM and is set out in section 315.7(4). The comment
stated: ``The six month interim decline is useful, but not responsive
enough to deal with a firm facing a rapid decline. A three month
interim decline would provide for more timely assistance, and minimize
unnecessary hardship to the firm.''
The NPRM did not propose a revision to this provision, however, EDA
has reviewed and addresses the comment in this final rule. EDA assumes
that the commenter is referring to the interim sales or production and
employment decline certification options in EDA's current regulations,
which allow a Firm to pursue certification without at least a year of
data showing sales or production and employment decline. The interim
decline options are a regulatory rule; they are not statute-based. The
addition of the interim decline options to the TAAF Program regulations
was based on EDA's interpretation of the Trade Act's language and
intent regarding the threat of employment separation and the need to
provide proactive assistance. EDA extrapolated that since the Trade Act
also focuses on the threat of harm, if a Firm can show a precipitous
decline over six months, then it is a reasonable assumption that the
pattern may continue.
Although the interim decline options are not statute-derived,
Congress has consistently appropriated the TAAF Program with those
options in place. EDA does not believe that three months provide enough
data to reasonably foresee a sales or production and employment
decline, and does not believe cutting the interim decline options in
half to three months will provide optimal program results.
Section 315.8--Processing Petitions for Certifications
EDA received two similar comments from the Directors of the Rocky
Mountain and Northwest TAACs on the proposed revision to section 315.8,
which provides that EDA has 40 days instead of 60 days from the date
EDA accepts a petition to make a certification determination to
implement section 251(d) of the Trade Act, as amended by section 1867
of the TGAAA. The commenters stated: ``This section should contain a
maximum number of days from receipt of a petition by EDA to `accept'
the petition for processing. To allow EDA an unlimited time to `accept'
a petition defeats the intent of Congress to only allow 40 days for EDA
to make a determination to certify or reject the petition. (see section
288 of Act).''
In practice, many petitions that are submitted to EDA are
incomplete or otherwise deficient in some manner. EDA has allowed and
continues to allow the TAACs to informally submit a petition and works
with the TAAC to resolve any deficiencies. After all deficiencies have
been resolved, EDA accepts the petition, which starts the certification
determination clock. EDA believes that automatically accepting all
petitions will result in a higher rate of petition denials. Once a
petition has been denied, the petitioning Firm must wait for one year
from the date of denial before re-applying. Although EDA may waive the
one-year limitation for good cause, EDA believes that the flexibility
of the current system best serves the interests of Firms. This
flexibility allows EDA to more effectively achieve the Congressional
intent, which is to assist trade-impacted Firms with a minimum of delay
and administrative burden. Firms likely to suffer the greatest trade-
induced stress may have difficulty responding expeditiously to requests
for clarification or to provide documentation and are most likely to
exceed a hard and fast 40-day limit. The new regulations should not
impose new response demands on already stressed Firms.
Section 315.10--Loss of Certification Benefits
EDA received the following comment from the Director of the
Northwest TAAC on proposed section 315.10(d), which was revised to
reflect EDA's current practice that a Certified Firm has five, not two,
years from the date upon which EDA approves an Adjustment Proposal to
complete work on the Adjustment Proposal: ``There should be a subpart
`(e)'. This subpart (e) should state a firm has five years from the
date their AP is approved to complete all parts of the implementation
as found within its AP, without approval from EDA for going beyond this
five year period to implement all aspects of the approved AP. This
would put these regulations in compliance with what is actually
occurring at the present time.''
EDA believes that the proposed revision reflects current practice
and that another subpart is not necessary.
Changes From the NPRM
After publication of the NPRM, EDA discovered that the proposed
revisions to the Firms' 24- or 36-month sales decline certification
requirements, set out in section 315.7(b)(2) and (3), do not reflect
the `average annual' language as provided in section 251 of the Trade
Act, as amended by section 1862 of the TGAAA. Therefore, in this final
rule, EDA revises section 315.7 to include the `average annual'
language, thereby
[[Page 41595]]
succeeding and nullifying the revision proposed in the NPRM.
Classification
Prior notice and opportunity for public comment are not required
for rules concerning public property, loans, grants, benefits, and
contracts (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2)). In the alternative, EDA finds good
cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness. EDA is required by the Trade and Globalization
Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009, which was included as subtitle I
within the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-
5, 123 Stat. 115, at 401), to implement these regulations by August 1,
2009. If this rulemaking was delayed to allow for a 30-day delay in
effectiveness, EDA would not be able to meet its statutory requirement.
Therefore, in order to make these regulations effective before August
1, 2009, EDA waives the 30-day in effectiveness and makes this rule
effective immediately.
Because prior notice and an opportunity for public comment are not
required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
are inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis has not
been prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (`PRA'). In regard to the
Community TAA Program, the Office of Management and Budget (`OMB') has
approved the use of Form ED-900 (`Application for Investment
Assistance') under Control Number 0610-0094. Form SF-424 (`Application
for Federal Assistance') is approved under OMB Control Number 4040-
0004. To estimate burden, EDA examined its experience with its public
works and economic adjustment assistance programs, which are authorized
under the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 3121 et seq.) (`PWEDA'). The potential demand for programs
under PWEDA is, of course, much greater because eligibility is based on
general economic distress and is not restricted to trade impact. EDA
estimates that demand from trade-impacted areas would constitute a
small fraction of all areas experiencing economic distress.
Nonetheless, to a certain extent, demand will be elastic depending on
the amount of appropriations Congress and the President approve for the
Community TAA Program. Because the respondent burden will be similar
for applications under the Community TAA Program as it is for
applications under EDA's traditional programs, if the Community TAA
Program is funded at its authorized level of $150,000,000, EDA
estimates that it may receive about 350 responses for a petition for
affirmative determination and 300 responses for an implementation
grant. EDA estimates that the total annual paperwork burden for a
petition for affirmative determination would be about 550 hours and the
total annual paperwork burden for an implementation grant application
would be about 6,500 hours. In regard to the TAAF Program, the use of
Form ED-840P (`Petition by a Firm for Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance') has been approved by OMB under
Control Number 0610-0091. In light of the expansion of the TAAF Program
to Service Sector Firms and the expansion of the `look back' periods,
EDA estimates the number of respondents who complete petitions for a
certification of eligibility will increase more than 100 percent to
about 500 respondents and that the total annual paperwork burden would
be about 4,100 hours.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
Executive Order No. 12866
It has been determined that this final rule is significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Congressional Review Act
This final rule is not `major' under the Congressional Review Act
(5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.).
Executive Order No. 13132
Executive Order 13132 requires agencies to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local
officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in Executive Order 13132 to include
regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government.'' It has been determined that this final rule does not
contain policies that have federalism implications.
List of Subjects
13 CFR Part 313
Trade adjustment assistance for communities, Impacted community,
Petition and affirmative determination requirements, Strategic plan,
Implementation grant.
13 CFR Part 315
Administrative practice and procedure, Trade adjustment assistance,
Eligible petitioner, Firm selection, Certification requirements,
Recordkeeping and audit requirements, Adjustment proposals.
Regulatory Text
0
For reasons stated in the preamble, EDA amends chapter III of title 13
of the Code of Federal Regulations to add new part 313 and to amend
part 315 as follows:
0
1. Add part 313 to read as follows:
PART 313--COMMUNITY TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec.
313.1 Purpose and scope.
313.2 Definitions.
Subpart B--Participation in the Community Trade Adjustment Assistance
Program
313.3 Overview of Community Trade Adjustment Assistance.
313.4 Affirmative determinations.
313.5 Technical assistance.
313.6 Strategic Plans.
313.7 Implementation grants for Impacted Communities.
313.8 Competitive process.
Subpart C--Administrative Provisions
313.9 Records.
313.10 Conflicts of interest.
313.11 Other requirements.
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 2341 et seq., as amended by Division B,
Title I, Subtitle I, Part II of Pub. L. 111-5; 42 U.S.C. 3211;
Department of Commerce Organizational Order 10-4.
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec. 313.1 Purpose and scope.
The regulations in this part set forth the responsibilities of the
Secretary of Commerce under chapter 4 of title II of the Trade Act
concerning Community Trade Adjustment Assistance (`Community TAA'). The
Community TAA Program is designed to assist Communities impacted by
trade with economic adjustment through the coordination of Federal,
State, and local resources, the creation of community-based development
strategies, and the
[[Page 41596]]
development and provision of programs that meet the training needs of
workers. The statutory authority and responsibilities of the Secretary
of Commerce relating to Community TAA are delegated to EDA. EDA
certifies Communities as eligible to apply for assistance under the
Community TAA Program, provides technical assistance to Impacted
Communities, and provides implementation assistance to Impacted
Communities in preparing and carrying out Strategic Plans.
Sec. 313.2 Definitions.
In addition to the defined terms set forth in Sec. 300.3 of this
chapter, the terms used in this part shall have the following meanings:
Agricultural Commodity Producer has the same meaning given to that
term in title II, chapter 6, section 291 of the Trade Act.
Community Adjustment Assistance means technical and implementation
assistance provided to an Impacted Community under chapter 4 of title
II of the Trade Act.
Community means a city, county, or other political subdivision of a
State or a consortium of political subdivisions of a State.
Cognizable Certification means a certification:
(1) By the Secretary of Labor that a group of workers in the
Community is eligible to apply for assistance under chapter 2, section
223 of the Trade Act;
(2) By the Secretary of Commerce that a Certified Firm (as defined
at Sec. 315.2 of this chapter) located in the Community is eligible to
apply for Adjustment Assistance in accordance with chapter 3, sections
251-253 of the Trade Act; or
(3) By the Secretary of Agriculture that a group of Agricultural
Commodity Producers in the Community is eligible to apply for
assistance under chapter 6, section 293 of the Trade Act.
Impacted Community means a Community that is affected by trade to
such a degree that the Secretary has made an affirmative determination
that it is eligible to apply for assistance under this part.
Strategic Plan means an Impacted Community's plan for improving its
economic situation developed in accordance with Sec. 313.6.
Subpart B--Participation in the Community Trade Adjustment
Assistance Program
Sec. 313.3 Overview of Community Trade Adjustment Assistance.
The Community TAA Program is designed to assist Communities
impacted by trade to adjust to that impact. The Community TAA Program
will be administered in accordance with the following process:
(a) Determination of eligibility. First, EDA must make an
affirmative determination that the Community is impacted by trade in
accordance with Sec. 313.4.
(b) Provision of technical assistance. After an affirmative
determination is made, EDA will provide the Impacted Community with
technical assistance in accordance with Sec. 313.5.
(c) Strategic Plan development. An Impacted Community that intends
to apply for an implementation grant in accordance with Sec. 313.7
must develop, in accordance with Sec. 313.6, an EDA-approved Strategic
Plan.
(d) Implementation grant. In accordance with Sec. 313.7, EDA may
award an implementation grant to assist an Impacted Community in
carrying out a project or program included in a Strategic Plan.
Sec. 313.4 Affirmative determinations.
(a) General. Subject to the availability of funds, a Community may
apply for an affirmative determination if:
(1) On or after August 1, 2009, one or more Cognizable
Certifications are made with respect to the Community; and
(2) The Community submits the petition at least 180 days after the
date of the most recent Cognizable Certification.
(b) Grandfathered Communities. If one or more Cognizable
Certifications were made with respect to a Community on or after
January 1, 2007, and before August 1, 2009, the Community may submit a
petition to EDA for an affirmative determination under this section not
later than February 1, 2010.
(c) Affirmative determination petition requirements. (1) The
Community must submit a complete petition to the applicable regional
office (or regional offices in the event the Community crosses multiple
geographic boundaries) serving the geographic area in which the
Community is located. A complete petition for an affirmative
determination shall contain the following:
(i) The `Application for Federal Assistance' (Form SF-424) that
contains such information to allow EDA to determine that the
petitioning Community is significantly affected by the threat to, or
the loss of, jobs associated with one or more Cognizable
Certifications;
(ii) The applicable Cognizable Certification(s) upon which the
Community bases its petition; and
(iii) Such other information as EDA considers material.
(2) The petition for affirmative determination must contain
information about the impact(s) on the Community from the actual or
threatened loss of jobs attributable to trade that led to the
applicable Cognizable Certification(s) made by the Secretaries of
Labor, Commerce or Agriculture, in order for EDA to determine that the
Community is significantly affected. EDA shall measure such impact(s)
using the petitioning Community's most recent Civilian Labor Force
statistics as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S.
Department of Labor, effective at the time of petition for affirmative
determination. EDA will obtain the applicable Cognizable Certification
from publicly available resources. However, a petitioning Community may
also provide copies of the applicable Cognizable Certification to EDA.
(d) Notification to Community. Upon making an affirmative
determination, EDA shall notify promptly the Community and the Governor
of the State in which the Community is located of the means for
obtaining assistance under this part and other appropriate economic
assistance that may be available to the Community. Such notification
will identify the appropriate EDA regional office that will provide
technical assistance under Sec. 313.5.
Sec. 313.5 Technical assistance.
(a) General. Once EDA has made an affirmative determination that a
Community is an Impacted Community and subject to the availability of
funds, EDA shall provide comprehensive technical assistance to:
(1) Diversify and strengthen the economy in the Impacted Community;
(2) Identify significant impediments to economic development that
result from the impact of trade on the Impacted Community; and
(3) Develop or update a Strategic Plan in accordance with Sec.
313.6 to address economic adjustment and workforce dislocation in the
Impacted Community, including unemployment among agricultural commodity
producers.
(b) Coordination of Federal response. EDA will coordinate the
Federal response to an Impacted Community by:
(1) Identifying Federal, State, and local resources that are
available to assist the Impacted Community in responding to economic
distress; and
(2) Assisting the Impacted Community in accessing available Federal
assistance and ensuring that such assistance is provided in a targeted,
integrated manner.
[[Page 41597]]
Sec. 313.6 Strategic Plans.
(a) General. An Impacted Community that intends to apply for a
grant for implementation assistance under Sec. 313.7 shall develop and
submit a Strategic Plan to EDA for evaluation and approval. EDA shall
evaluate the Strategic Plan based on the technical requirements set
forth in paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Involvement of private and public entities. To the extent
practicable, an Impacted Community shall consult with the following
entities in developing a Strategic Plan:
(1) Federal, local, county, or State government agencies serving
the Impacted Community;
(2) Firms, as defined in Sec. 315.2 of this chapter, including
small- and medium-sized Firms, within the Impacted Community;
(3) Local workforce investment boards established under section 117
of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2832);
(4) Labor organizations, including State labor federations and
labor-management initiatives, representing workers in the Impacted
Community; and
(5) Educational institutions, local educational agencies, or other
training providers serving the Impacted Community.
(c) Technical requirements. EDA shall evaluate the Strategic Plan
based on the following minimum requirements:
(1) An analysis of the capacity of the Impacted Community to
achieve economic adjustment to the impact(s) of trade;
(2) An analysis of the economic development challenges and
opportunities facing the Impacted Community as well as the strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities, and threats facing the Impacted Community;
(3) An assessment of the commitment of the Impacted Community to
the Strategic Plan over the long term and the participation and input
of members of the Community affected by economic dislocation, including
how the Strategic Plan will be integrated effectively with one or more
applicable Comprehensive Economic Development Strategies (`CEDS') that
have been developed in connection with EDA's economic development
assistance programs as set out at Sec. 303.7 of this chapter;
(4) A description of the role and the participation of the entities
described in paragraph (b) of this section in developing the Strategic
Plan;
(5) A description of the projects to be undertaken by the Impacted
Community under its Strategic Plan and how such projects will
facilitate the Impacted Community's economic adjustment;
(6) A description of the educational and training programs
available to workers in the Impacted Community and the future
employment needs of the Community;
(7) An assessment of the cost of implementing the Strategic Plan,
including the timing of funding required by the Impacted Community to
implement the Strategic Plan and the method of financing to be used to
implement the Strategic Plan; and
(8) A strategy for continuing the economic adjustment of the
Impacted Community after the completion of the projects described in
paragraph (c)(5) of this section.
(d) Cost sharing limitation. Assistance awarded to an Impacted
Community to develop a Strategic Plan under this section shall not
exceed 75 percent of the cost of developing the Strategic Plan. In
order to provide funding to as many merit-worthy Impacted Communities
as feasible, EDA may base the amount of the Community's required share
on the relative distress caused by the actual or threatened decline in
the most recent Civilian Labor Force statistics effective on the date
EDA receives an application to develop a Strategic Plan.
Sec. 313.7 Implementation grants for Impacted Communities.
(a) General. EDA may provide assistance in the form of a grant
under this section to an Impacted Community to help the Community carry
out a project or program that is included in a Strategic Plan developed
in accordance with Sec. 313.6. Such assistance may include:
(1) Infrastructure improvements, such as site acquisition, site
preparation, construction, rehabilitation and equipping of facilities;
(2) Market or industry research and analysis;
(3) Technical assistance, including organizational development such
as business networking, restructuring or improving the delivery of
business services, or feasibility studies;
(4) Public services;
(5) Training; and
(6) Other activities justified by the Strategic Plan that satisfy
applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.
(b) Application evaluation criteria. (1) An Impacted Community that
seeks to receive an implementation grant under this section shall
submit a completed `Application for Federal Assistance' (Form ED-900 or
any successor form) to the applicable regional office (or regional
offices in the event the Community crosses multiple geographic
boundaries) serving the geographic area in which the Community is
located. A complete application also shall include:
(i) The EDA-approved Strategic Plan that meets the requirements of
Sec. 313.6; and
(ii) A description of the project or program included in the
Strategic Plan with respect to which the Impacted Community seeks
assistance.
(2) EDA will evaluate all applications for the feasibility of the
budget presented and conformance with statutory and regulatory
requirements. EDA also will consider the degree to which an
implementation grant in the Impacted Community will satisfy the
evaluation criteria set forth in the applicable FFO announcement.
(c) Coordination among grant programs. If an entity in an Impacted
Community seeks or plans to seek a Community College and Career
Training Grant under section 278 of the Trade Act or a Sector
Partnership Grant under section 279A of the Trade Act while the
Impacted Community seeks assistance under this section, the Impacted
Community shall include in the application for assistance a description
of how the Impacted Community will integrate any projects or programs
carried out using assistance provided under this section with any
projects or programs that may be implemented with other Federal
assistance.
(d) Cost sharing requirement. (1) If an Impacted Community is
awarded an implementation grant under this section, the following
requirements shall apply:
(i) Federal share. The Federal share of a project or program for
which a grant is awarded may not exceed 95 percent of the cost of
implementing the project or program; and
(ii) Community's share. The Impacted Community must contribute at
least five percent of the amount of the implementation grant towards
the cost of implementing the project or program for which the grant is
awarded.
(2) In order to provide funding to as many merit-worthy Impacted
Communities as feasible, EDA may base the amount of the Community's
required share on the relative distress caused by the actual or
threatened decline in the most recent Civilian Labor Force statistics
effective on the date EDA receives an application for an implementation
grant.
(e) Limitation. An Impacted Community may not be awarded more than
$5,000,000 in implementation grant assistance under this section.
[[Page 41598]]
Sec. 313.8 Competitive process.
(a) Applications for assistance to develop a Strategic Plan or for
an implementation grant shall be reviewed by EDA in accord with a
competitive process as set forth in the applicable FFO, to ensure that
EDA awards funds to the most merit-worthy projects.
(b) Priority for grants to small- and medium-sized Communities. EDA
shall give priority to an application submitted under this part by an
Impacted Community that is a small- or medium-sized Community.
(c) Supplement, not supplant. The Community TAA Program and any
funds appropriated to implement its provisions shall be used to
supplement and not supplant other Federal, State, and local public
funds expended to provide economic development assistance for
Communities.
Subpart C--Administrative Provisions
Sec. 313.9 Records.
Communities that receive assistance under this part are subject to
the records requirements set out in Sec. 302.14 of this chapter.
Sec. 313.10 Conflicts of interest.
Communities that receive assistance under this part are subject to
the conflicts of interest provisions as set out in Sec. 302.17 of this
chapter.
Sec. 313.11 Other requirements.
Communities that receive assistance under this part are subject to
the general terms and conditions for Investment Assistance set out in
part 302 of this chapter relating to requirements involving the
environment (Sec. 302.1); post-disaster assistance (Sec. 302.2);
public information (Sec. 302.4); relocation assistance and land
acquisition (Sec. 302.5); Federal policies and procedures (Sec.
302.6); amendments and changes to awards (Sec. 302.7); pre-approval
costs (Sec. 302.8); intergovernmental project reviews (Sec. 302.9);
attorneys' and consultants' fees or the employment of expediters (Sec.
302.10); EDA's economic development information clearinghouse (Sec.
302.11); project administration, operation, and maintenance (Sec.
302.12); post-approval requirements (Sec. 302.18); indemnification
(Sec. 302.19); and civil rights (Sec. 302.20). In addition, any
Property (defined at Sec. 314.1) acquired in connection with
Investment Assistance is subject to the property management regulations
set out in part 314 of this chapter.
0
2. Revise part 315 to read as follows:
PART 315--TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR FIRMS
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec.
315.1 Purpose and scope.
315.2 Definitions.
315.3 Confidential Business Information.
315.4 Eligible applicants.
315.5 TAAC scope, selection, evaluation and awards.
315.6 Firm eligibility for Adjustment Assistance.
Subpart B--Certification of Firms
315.7 Certification requirements.
315.8 Processing petitions for certification.
315.9 Hearings.
315.10 Loss of certification benefits.
315.11 Appeals, final determinations and termination of
certification.
Subpart C--Protective Provisions
315.12 Recordkeeping.
315.13 Audit and examination.
315.14 Certifications.
315.15 Conflicts of interest.
Subpart D--Adjustment Proposals
315.16 Adjustment proposal requirements.
Subpart E--Assistance to Industries
315.17 Assistance to Firms in import-impacted industries.
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 2341 et seq., as amended by Division B,
Title I, Subtitle I, Part II of Pub. L. 111-5; 42 U.S.C. 3211;
Department of Commerce Organization Order 10-4.
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec. 315.1 Purpose and scope.
The regulations in this part set forth the responsibilities of the
Secretary of Commerce under chapter 3 of title II of the Trade Act
concerning Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. The statutory
authority and responsibilities of the Secretary of Commerce relating to
Adjustment Assistance are delegated to EDA. EDA certifies Firms as
eligible to apply for Adjustment Assistance, provides technical
Adjustment Assistance to Firms and other recipients, and provides
assistance to organizations representing trade injured industries.
Sec. 315.2 Definitions.
In addition to the defined terms set forth in Sec. 300.3 of this
chapter, the following terms used in this part shall have the following
meanings:
Adjustment Assistance means technical assistance provided to Firms
or industries under chapter 3 of title II of the Trade Act.
Adjustment Proposal means a Certified Firm's plan for improving its
economic situation.
Certified Firm means a Firm which has been determined by EDA to be
eligible to apply for Adjustment Assistance.
Confidential Business Information means any information submitted
to EDA or a TAAC by a Firm that concerns or relates to trade secrets
for commercial or financial purposes, which is exempt from public
disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and 15 CFR
part 4.
Contributed Importantly, with respect to an Increase in Imports,
refers to a cause which is important but not necessarily more important
than any other cause. Imports will not be considered to have
Contributed Importantly if other factors were so dominant, acting
singly or in combination, that the worker separation or threat thereof
or decline in sales or production would have been essentially the same,
irrespective of the influence of imports.
Decreased Absolutely means a Firm's sales or production has
declined by a minimum of five percent relative to its sales or
production during the applicable prior time period,
(1) Independent of industry or market fluctuations; and
(2) Relative only to the previous performance of the Firm, unless
EDA determines that these limitations in a given case would not be
consistent with the purposes of the Trade Act.
Directly Competitive means imported articles or services that
compete with and are substantially equivalent for commercial purposes
(i.e., are adapted for the same function or use and are essentially
interchangeable) as the Firm's articles or services. Any Firm that
engages in exploring or drilling for oil or natural gas, or otherwise
produces oil or natural gas, shall be considered to be producing
articles directly competitive with imports of oil and with imports of
natural gas.
Firm means an individual proprietorship, partnership, joint
venture, association, corporation (includes a development corporation),
business trust, cooperative, trustee in bankruptcy or receiver under
court decree, and includes fishing, agricultural or service sector
entities and those which explore, drill or otherwise produce oil or
natural gas. See also the definition of Service Sector Firm. Pursuant
to section 261 of chapter 3 of title II of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C.
2351), a Firm, together with any predecessor or successor firm, or any
affiliated firm controlled or substantially beneficially owned by
substantially the same person, may be considered a single Firm where
necessary to prevent unjustifiable benefits. For purposes of receiving
[[Page 41599]]
benefits under this part, when a Firm owns or controls other Firms, the
Firm and such other Firms may be considered a single Firm when they
produce or supply like or Directly Competitive articles or services or
are exerting essential economic control over one or more production
facilities. Accordingly, such other Firms may include a(n):
(1) Predecessor--see the following definition for Successor;
(2) Successor--a newly established Firm (that has been in business
less than two years) which has purchased substantially all of the
assets of a previously operating company (or in some cases a whole
distinct division) (such prior company, unit or division, a
`Predecessor') and is able to demonstrate that it continued the
operations of the Predecessor which has operated as an autonomous unit,
provided that there were no significant transactions between the
Predecessor unit and any related parent, subsidiary, or affiliate that
would have affected its past performance, and that separate records are
available for the Predecessor's operations for at least two years
before the petition is submitted. The Successor Firm must have
continued virtually all of the Predecessor Firm's operations by
producing the same type of products or services, in the same plant,
utilizing most of the same machinery and equipment and most of its
former workers, and the Predecessor Firm must no longer be in
existence;
(3) Affiliate--a company (either foreign or domestic) controlled or
substantially beneficially owned by substantially the same person or
persons that own or control the Firm filing the petition; or
(4) Subsidiary--a company (either foreign or domestic) that is
wholly owned or effectively controlled by another company.
Increase in Imports means an increase of imports of Directly
Competitive or Like Articles or Services with articles produced or
services supplied by such Firm. EDA may consider as evidence of an
Increase in Imports a certification from the Firm's customers that
account for a significant percentage of the Firm's decrease in sales or
production that they have increased their purchase of imports of
Directly Competitive or Like Articles or Services from a foreign
country, either absolutely or relative to their acquisition of such
Like Articles or Services from suppliers located in the United States.
Like Articles or Services means any articles or services, as
applicable, which are substantially identical in their intrinsic
characteristics.
Partial Separation means, with respect to any employment in a Firm,
either:
(1) A reduction in an employee's work hours to 80 percent or less
of the employee's average weekly hours during the year of such
reductions as compared to the preceding year; or
(2) A reduction in the employee's weekly wage to 80 percent or less
of his/her average weekly wage during the year of such reduction as
compared to the preceding year.
Person means an individual, organization or group.
Record means any of the following:
(1) A petition for certification of eligibility to qualify for
Adjustment Assistance;
(2) Any supporting information submitted by a petitioner;
(3) The report of an EDA investigation with respect to petition;
and
(4) Any information developed during an investigation or in
connection with any public hearing held on a petition.
Service Sector Firm means a Firm engaged in the business of
supplying services. For purposes of receiving benefits under this part,
when a Service Sector Firm owns or controls other Service Sector Firms,
the Service Sector Firm and such other Service Sector Firms may be
considered a single Service Sector Firm when they furnish like or
Directly Competitive services or are exerting essential economic
control over one or more servicing facilities. Such other Service
Sector Firm may be a Predecessor, Successor, Affiliate or Subsidiary,
each as defined in the definition of Firm.
Significant Number or Proportion of Workers means five percent of a
Firm's work force or 50 workers, whichever is less, unless EDA
determines that these limitations in a given case would not be
consistent with the purposes of the Trade Act. An individual farmer or
fisherman is considered a Significant Number or Proportion of Workers.
Substantial Interest means a direct material economic interest in
the certification or non-certification of the petitioner.
TAAC means a Trade Adjustment Assistance Center, as more fully
described in Sec. 315.5.
Threat of Total or Partial Separation means, with respect to any
group of workers, one or more events or circumstances clearly
demonstrating that a Total or Partial Separation is imminent.
Total Separation means, with respect to any employment in a Firm,
the laying off or termination of employment of an employee for lack of
work.
Sec. 315.3 Confidential Business Information.
EDA will follow the procedures set forth in 15 CFR 4.9 for the
submission of Confidential Business Information. Submitters should
clearly mark and designate as confidential any Confidential Business
Information.
Sec. 315.4 Eligible applicants.
(a) The following entities may apply for assistance to operate a
TAAC:
(1) Universities or affiliated organizations;
(2) States or local governments; or
(3) Non-profit organizations.
(b) For purposes of Sec. 315.17 and to the extent funds are
appropriated to implement section 265 of the Trade Act, organizations
assisting or representing industries in which a substantial number of
Firms or workers have been certified as eligible to apply for
Adjustment Assistance under sections 223 and 251 of the Trade Act,
include:
(1) Existing agencies;
(2) Private individuals;
(3) Firms;
(4) Universities;
(5) Institutions;
(6) Associations;
(7) Unions; or
(8) Other non-profit industry organizations.
Sec. 315.5 TAAC scope, selection, evaluation and awards.
(a) TAAC purpose and scope. (1) TAACs are available to assist Firms
in obtaining Adjustment Assistance in all 50 U.S. States, the District
of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. TAACs provide
Adjustment Assistance in accordance with this part either through their
own staffs or by arrangements with outside consultants. Information
concerning TAACs serving particular areas may be obtained from the TAAC
Web site at https://www.taacenters.org or from EDA at https://www.eda.gov.
(2) Prior to submitting a petition for Adjustment Assistance to
EDA, a Firm should determine the extent to which a TAAC can provide the
required Adjustment Assistance. EDA will provide Adjustment Assistance
through TAACs whenever EDA determines that such assistance can be
provided most effectively in this manner. Requests for Adjustment
Assistance will normally be made through TAACs.
(3) A TAAC generally provides Adjustment Assistance by providing
assistance to a:
(i) Firm in preparing its petition for eligibility certification;
and
(ii) Certified Firm in diagnosing its strengths and weaknesses, and
developing and implementing an Adjustment Proposal.
[[Page 41600]]
(b) TAAC selection. (1) EDA invites currently funded TAACs to
submit either new or amended applications, provided they have performed
in a satisfactory manner and complied with previous or current
conditions in their Cooperative Agreements with EDA and contingent upon
availability of funds. Such TAACs shall submit an application on a form
approved by OMB, as well as a proposed budget, narrative scope of work,
and such other information as requested by EDA. Acceptance of an
application or amended application for a Cooperative Agreement does not
ensure funding by EDA.
(2) EDA may invite new applications through a Federal Funding
Opportunity (`FFO') announcement. An application will require a
narrative scope of work, proposed budget and such other information as
requested by EDA. Acceptance of an application does not ensure funding
by EDA.
(c) TAAC evaluation. (1) EDA generally evaluates currently funded
TAACs based on:
(i) Performance under Cooperative Agreements with EDA and
compliance with the terms and conditions of such Cooperative
Agreements;
(ii) Proposed scope of work, budget and application or amended
application; and
(iii) Availability of funds.
(2) EDA generally evaluates new TAACs based on:
(i) Competence in administering business assistance programs;
(ii) Background and experience of staff;
(iii) Proposed scope of work, budget and application; and
(iv) Availability of funds.
(d) TAAC award requirements. (1) EDA generally funds a TAAC for a
three-year project period consisting of three separate funding periods
of 12 months each.
(2) There are no matching share requirements for Adjustment
Assistance provided by the TAACs to Firms for certification or for
administrative expenses of the TAACs.
Sec. 315.6 Firm eligibility for Adjustment Assistance.
(a) Firms participate in the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms
program in accordance with the following:
(1) Firms apply for certification through a TAAC by completing a
petition for certification. The TAAC will assist Firms in completing
such petitions (at no cost to the Firms);
(2) Firms certified in accordance with the procedures described in
Sec. Sec. 315.7 and 315.8 must prepare an Adjustment Proposal for
Adjustment Assistance from the TAAC (`Adjustment Proposal') and submit
it to EDA for approval; and
(3) EDA determines whether the Adjustment Assistance requested in
the Adjustment Proposal is eligible based upon the evaluation criteria
set forth in subpart D of this part. A Certified Firm may submit a
request to the TAAC for Adjustment Assistance to implement an approved
Adjustment Proposal.
(b) For certification, EDA evaluates Firms' petitions strictly on
the basis of fulfillment of the requirements set forth in Sec. 315.7.
(c) (1) Certified Firms generally receive Adjustment Assistance
over a two-year period.
(2) The matching share requirements are as follows:
(i) Each Certified Firm must pay at least 25 percent of the cost of
preparing its Adjustment Proposal. Each Certified Firm requesting
$30,000 or less in total Adjustment Assistance in its approved
Adjustment Proposal must pay at least 25 percent of the cost of that
Adjustment Assistance. Each Certified Firm requesting more than $30,000
in total Adjustment Assistance in its approved Adjustment Proposal must
pay at least 50 percent of the cost of that Adjustment Assistance.
(ii) Organizations representing trade-injured industries must pay
at least 50 percent of the total cash cost of the Adjustment
Assistance, in addition to appropriate in-kind contributions.
Subpart B--Certification of Firms
Sec. 315.7 Certification requirements.
(a) General. EDA may certify a Firm as eligible to apply for
Adjustment Assistance under section 251(c) of the Trade Act if it
determines that the petition for certification meets one of the minimum
certification thresholds set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. In
order to be certified, a Firm must meet the criteria listed under any
one of the 5 circumstances described in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Minimum certification thresholds. (1) Twelve-month decline.
Based upon a comparison of the most recent 12-month period for which
data are available and the immediately preceding twelve-month period:
(i) A Significant Number or Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or a Threat of Total or Partial
Separation;
(ii) Either sales or production, or both, of the Firm has Decreased
Absolutely; or sales or production, or both, of any article or service
that accounted for not less than 25 percent of the total production or
sales of the Firm during the 12-month period preceding the most recent
12-month period for which data are available have Decreased Absolutely;
and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or Threat of Total or Partial
Separation, and to the applicable decline in sales or production or
supply of services.
(2) Twelve-month versus twenty-four month decline. Based upon a
comparison of the most recent 12-month period for which data are
available and the immediately preceding 24-month period:
(i) A Significant Number or Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or a Threat of Total or Partial
Separation;
(ii) Either average annual sales or production, or both, of the
Firm has Decreased Absolutely; or average annual sales or production,
or both, of any article or service that accounted for not less than 25
percent of the total production or sales of the Firm during the 24-
month period preceding the most recent 12-month period for which data
are available have Decreased Absolutely; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or Threat of Total or Partial
Separation, and to the applicable decline in sales or production or
supply of services.
(3) Twelve-month versus thirty-six month decline. Based upon a
comparison of the most recent 12-month period for which data are
available and the immediately preceding 36-month period:
(i) A Significant Number or Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or a Threat of Total or Partial
Separation;
(ii) Either average annual sales or production, or both, of the
Firm has Decreased Absolutely; or average annual sales or production,
or both, of any article or service that accounted for not less than 25
percent of the total production or sales of the Firm during the 36-
month period preceding the most recent 12-month period for which data
are available have Decreased Absolutely; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or Threat of Total or Partial
Separation, and to the applicable decline in sales or production or
supply of services.
(4) Interim sales or production decline. Based upon an interim
sales or production decline:
[[Page 41601]]
(i) Sales or production has Decreased Absolutely for, at minimum,
the most recent six-month period during the most recent 12-month period
for which data are available as compared to the same six-month period
during the immediately preceding 12-month period;
(ii) During the same base and comparative period of time as sales
or production has Decreased Absolutely, a Significant Number or
Proportion of Workers in such Firm has undergone Total or Partial
Separation or a Threat of Total or Partial Separation; and
(iii) During the same base and comparative period of time as sales
or production has Decreased Absolutely, an Increase in Imports has
Contributed Importantly to the applicable Total or Partial Separation
or Threat of Total or Partial Separation, and to the applicable decline
in sales or production or supply of services.
(5) Interim employment decline. Based upon an interim employment
decline:
(i) A Significant Number or Proportion of Workers in such Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or a Threat of Total or Partial
Separation during, at a minimum, the most recent six-month period
during the most recent 12-month period for which data are available as
compared to the same six-month period during the immediately preceding
12-month period; and
(ii) Either sales or production of the Firm has Decreased
Absolutely during the 12-month period preceding the most recent 12-
month period for which data are available; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or Threat of Total or Partial
Separation, and to the applicable decline in sales or production or
supply of services.
Sec. 315.8 Processing petitions for certification.
(a) Firms shall consult with a TAAC for guidance and assistance in
the preparation of their petitions for certification.
(b) A Firm seeking certification shall complete a Petition by a
Firm for Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (Form ED-840P or any successor form) with the following
information about such Firm:
(1) Identification and description of the Firm, including legal
form of organization, economic history, major ownership interests,
officers, directors, management, parent company, Subsidiaries or
Affiliates, and production and sales facilities;
(2) Description of goods or services supplied or sold;
(3) Description of imported Directly Competitive or Like Articles
or Services with those produced or supplied;
(4) Data on its sales, production and employment for the applicable
24-month, 36-month, or 48-month period, as required under Sec.
315.7(b);
(5) One copy of a complete auditor's certified financial report for
the entire period covering the petition, or if not available, one copy
of the complete profit and loss statements, balance sheets and
supporting statements prepared by the Firm's accountants for the entire
period covered by the petition; publicly-owned corporations should
submit copies of the most recent Form 10-K annual reports (or Form 10-Q
quarterly reports, as appropriate) filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission for the entire period covered by the petition;
(6) Information concerning its major customers and their purchases
(or its bids, if there are no major customers); and
(7) Such other information as EDA considers material.
(c) EDA shall determine whether the petition has been properly
prepared and can be accepted. Promptly thereafter, EDA shall notify the
petitioner