Airworthiness Directives; BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ Airplanes, 41605-41607 [E9-19442]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Saab Aircraft AB, SAAB
¨
Aerosystems, SE–581 88, Linkoping, Sweden;
telephone +46 13 18 5591; fax +46 13 18
4874; e-mail
saab2000.techsupport@saabgroup.com;
Internet https://www.saabgroup.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
3, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–19182 Filed 8–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0532; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–024–AD; Amendment
39–15994; AD 2009–17–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Model
BAe 146 and Avro 146–RJ Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
The airbrake upper crossbeam on an
airplane failed in-flight. The crossbeam
failure caused damage to the rudder control
system, resulting in loss of rudder control.
Loss of rudder control will cause handling
difficulties particularly during take-off,
approach, and landing phases in cross winds.
*
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
41605
DATES: This AD becomes effective
September 22, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of September 22, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The required actions include
replacing the three rivets with Hi-lok
pins. For cracking, damage, or
discontinuity that is outside certain
limits defined in the service bulletin,
the repair includes contacting BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited for repair
instructions and doing the repair. You
may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Discussion
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on June 11, 2009 (74 FR 27725).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
The airbrake upper crossbeam on an
airplane failed in-flight. The crossbeam
failure caused damage to the rudder control
system, resulting in loss of rudder control.
Loss of rudder control will cause handling
difficulties particularly during take-off,
approach, and landing phases in cross winds.
BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has
published Inspection Service Bulletin (ISB)
53–200 that revises and supersedes the
inspection requirements, which are defined
in the Maintenance Review Board Report
(MRBR) SSI Task 53–40–125, Supplemental
Structural Inspections Document (SSID)
Tasks 53–40–125.1 and 53–40–125.2
(included in the Airworthiness Limitations
Section of Aircraft Maintenance Manual
Chapter 5 that is currently mandated as part
of EASA AD 2007–0271 [which corresponds
to an FAA NPRM, Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–363–AD]) and in Maintenance
Planning Document (MPD) Task Reference
534025–DVI–10000–1. These revised
inspection requirements and reduced
inspection periods are to ensure that any
fatigue damage is detected before it causes
upper airbrake crossbeam failure. MRBR,
SSID and MPD will be amended in due
course to reflect these revised inspection
periods.
For the reasons stated above, this
Airworthiness Directive (AD) requires the
[high frequency eddy current and low
frequency phase analysis eddy current]
inspection [for cracking, discrete surface
damage, and discontinuity (corrosion and
mechanical damage)] and, as necessary,
repair of the airbrake upper crossbeam.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 1
product of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it takes about 6 work-hours
per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $480
per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
41606
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
§ 39.13
Regulatory Findings
Effective Date
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
Actions and Compliance
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2009–17–03 BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited (Formerly British Aerospace
Regional Aircraft): Amendment 39–
15994. Docket No. FAA–2009–0532;
Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–024–AD.
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective September 22, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Model BAe 146 and
Avro 146–RJ airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53: Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
The airbrake upper crossbeam on an
airplane failed in-flight. The crossbeam
failure caused damage to the rudder control
system, resulting in loss of rudder control.
Loss of rudder control will cause handling
difficulties particularly during take-off,
approach, and landing phases in cross winds.
BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has
published Inspection Service Bulletin (ISB)
53–200 that revises and supersedes the
inspection requirements, which are defined
in the Maintenance Review Board Report
(MRBR) SSI Task 53–40–125, Supplemental
Structural Inspections Document (SSID)
Tasks 53–40–125.1 and 53–40–125.2
(included in the Airworthiness Limitations
Section of Aircraft Maintenance Manual
Chapter 5 that is currently mandated as part
of EASA AD 2007–0271 [which corresponds
to an FAA NPRM, Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–363–AD]) and in Maintenance
Planning Document (MPD) Task Reference
534025–DVI–10000–1. These revised
inspection requirements and reduced
inspection periods are to ensure that any
fatigue damage is detected before it causes
upper airbrake crossbeam failure. MRBR,
SSID and MPD will be amended in due
course to reflect these revised inspection
periods.
For the reasons stated above, this
Airworthiness Directive (AD) requires the
[high frequency eddy current and a low
frequency phase analysis eddy current]
inspection [for cracking, discrete surface
damage, and discontinuity (corrosion and
mechanical damage)] and, as necessary,
repair of the airbrake upper crossbeam.
The required actions include replacing the
three rivets with Hi-lok pins. For cracking,
damage, or discontinuity that is outside
certain limits defined in the service bulletin,
the repair includes contacting BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited for repair instructions
and doing the repair.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions:
(1) At the applicable time specified in
paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD,
inspect for cracking, damage, and
discontinuity of the airbrake upper
crossbeam fastener positions and lightening
holes; and replace the three rivets with Hilok pins; in accordance with paragraphs 2.B.,
2.C., and 2.D. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–
200, Revision 1, dated March 13, 2007. If any
crack, damage, or discontinuity is found:
Before further flight, repair as required by
paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
(i) For airplanes that have not been
inspected in accordance with BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited MRBR SSI Task No. 53–
40–125 (MPD Reference 534025–DVI–10000–
1) as of the effective date of this AD, do the
inspection prior to accumulating 20,000 total
flight cycles or 500 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
(ii) For airplanes subject to MRBR and
SSID requirements that have been inspected
in accordance with BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited MRBR SSI Task No. 53–
40–125 (MPD Reference 534025–DVI–10000–
1) as of the effective date of this AD, do the
inspection at the latest of the times in
paragraphs (f)(1)(ii)(A), (f)(1)(ii)(B), or
(f)(1)(ii)(C) of this AD.
(A) Before the accumulation of 4,000 flight
cycles since last inspection.
(B) Within 2,500 flight cycles (for MRBR
airplanes), or within 1,000 flight cycles (for
SSID airplanes) after the effective date of this
AD; but not exceeding 8,000 flight cycles
since the last inspection.
(C) Within 500 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD thereafter at the
applicable time specified in paragraph
(f)(2)(i), (f)(2)(ii), or (f)(2)(iii) of this AD. If
any crack, damage, or discontinuity is found:
Before further flight, repair as required by
paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
(i) Inspect fastener positions at the rivet
locations at intervals not to exceed 4,000
flight cycles.
(ii) Inspect the holes at Hi-lok pin locations
at intervals not to exceed 12,000 flight cycles.
(iii) Inspect the lightening holes at
intervals not to exceed 12,000 flight cycles.
(3) If any crack, damage, or discontinuity
is found during any inspection required by
this AD: Before further flight, do the repair
in accordance with paragraph 2.E. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53–200, Revision 1,
dated March 13, 2007.
(4) Actions accomplished before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–200,
dated December 21, 2006, are considered
acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding action specified in this AD.
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to Attn: Todd Thompson,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
cprice-sewell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2007–
0307, dated December 17, 2007; and BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53–200, Revision 1,
dated March 13, 2007; for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–
200, Revision 1, dated March 13, 2007, to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact BAE Systems Regional
Aircraft, 13850 McLearen Road, Herndon,
Virginia 20171; telephone 703–736–1080; email raebusiness@baesystems.com; Internet
https://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/
RegionalAircraft/index.htm.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:34 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_
locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
4, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–19442 Filed 8–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–1143; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–136–AD; Amendment
39–15990; AD 2009–16–07]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and
–900 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD),
which applies to certain Boeing Model
737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and –900
series airplanes. That AD currently
requires replacing brackets that hold the
P5 panel to the airplane structure, the
standby compass bracket assembly, the
generator drive and standby power
module, and the air conditioning
module, as applicable. The existing AD
also currently requires, among other
actions, inspecting for wire length and
for damage of the connectors and the
wire bundles, and doing applicable
corrective actions if necessary. This new
AD requires an additional operational
test of the P5–14 panel. This AD results
from a report of an electrical burning
smell in the flight compartment. We are
issuing this AD to prevent wire bundles
from contacting the overhead dripshield
panel and modules in the P5 overhead
panel, which could result in electrical
arcing and shorting of the electrical
connector and consequent loss of
several critical systems essential for safe
flight; and to ensure proper operation of
the passenger oxygen system. If an
improperly functioning passenger
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41607
oxygen system goes undetected, the
passenger oxygen mask could fail to
deploy and result in possible
incapacitation of passengers during a
depressurization event.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
September 22, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of September 22, 2009.
On June 22, 2006 (71 FR 28766, May
18, 2006), the Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain other publications
listed in the AD.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Binh Tran, Systems and Equipment
Branch, ANM–130S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6485;
fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that
supersedes AD 2006–10–17, amendment
39–14601 (71 FR 28766, May 18, 2006).
The existing AD applies to certain
Boeing Model 737–600, –700, –700C,
–800, and –900 series airplanes. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on October 31, 2008 (73 FR
64894). That NPRM proposed to
continue to require replacing brackets
that hold the P5 panel to the airplane
structure, the standby compass bracket
assembly, the generator drive and
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 18, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41605-41607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19442]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0532; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-024-AD;
Amendment 39-15994; AD 2009-17-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model
BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
The airbrake upper crossbeam on an airplane failed in-flight.
The crossbeam failure caused damage to the rudder control system,
resulting in loss of rudder control. Loss of rudder control will
cause handling difficulties particularly during take-off, approach,
and landing phases in cross winds.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective September 22, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of September 22,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on June 11, 2009 (74 FR
27725). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
The airbrake upper crossbeam on an airplane failed in-flight.
The crossbeam failure caused damage to the rudder control system,
resulting in loss of rudder control. Loss of rudder control will
cause handling difficulties particularly during take-off, approach,
and landing phases in cross winds.
BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has published Inspection Service
Bulletin (ISB) 53-200 that revises and supersedes the inspection
requirements, which are defined in the Maintenance Review Board
Report (MRBR) SSI Task 53-40-125, Supplemental Structural
Inspections Document (SSID) Tasks 53-40-125.1 and 53-40-125.2
(included in the Airworthiness Limitations Section of Aircraft
Maintenance Manual Chapter 5 that is currently mandated as part of
EASA AD 2007-0271 [which corresponds to an FAA NPRM, Directorate
Identifier 2007-NM-363-AD]) and in Maintenance Planning Document
(MPD) Task Reference 534025-DVI-10000-1. These revised inspection
requirements and reduced inspection periods are to ensure that any
fatigue damage is detected before it causes upper airbrake crossbeam
failure. MRBR, SSID and MPD will be amended in due course to reflect
these revised inspection periods.
For the reasons stated above, this Airworthiness Directive (AD)
requires the [high frequency eddy current and low frequency phase
analysis eddy current] inspection [for cracking, discrete surface
damage, and discontinuity (corrosion and mechanical damage)] and, as
necessary, repair of the airbrake upper crossbeam.
The required actions include replacing the three rivets with Hi-lok
pins. For cracking, damage, or discontinuity that is outside certain
limits defined in the service bulletin, the repair includes contacting
BAE Systems (Operations) Limited for repair instructions and doing the
repair. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the
AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 1 product of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it takes about 6 work-hours per product to comply
with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $80
per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD
to the U.S. operators to be $480 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
[[Page 41606]]
air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air
commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2009-17-03 BAE Systems (Operations) Limited (Formerly British
Aerospace Regional Aircraft): Amendment 39-15994. Docket No. FAA-
2009-0532; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-024-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective
September 22, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Model BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
The airbrake upper crossbeam on an airplane failed in-flight.
The crossbeam failure caused damage to the rudder control system,
resulting in loss of rudder control. Loss of rudder control will
cause handling difficulties particularly during take-off, approach,
and landing phases in cross winds.
BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has published Inspection Service
Bulletin (ISB) 53-200 that revises and supersedes the inspection
requirements, which are defined in the Maintenance Review Board
Report (MRBR) SSI Task 53-40-125, Supplemental Structural
Inspections Document (SSID) Tasks 53-40-125.1 and 53-40-125.2
(included in the Airworthiness Limitations Section of Aircraft
Maintenance Manual Chapter 5 that is currently mandated as part of
EASA AD 2007-0271 [which corresponds to an FAA NPRM, Directorate
Identifier 2007-NM-363-AD]) and in Maintenance Planning Document
(MPD) Task Reference 534025-DVI-10000-1. These revised inspection
requirements and reduced inspection periods are to ensure that any
fatigue damage is detected before it causes upper airbrake crossbeam
failure. MRBR, SSID and MPD will be amended in due course to reflect
these revised inspection periods.
For the reasons stated above, this Airworthiness Directive (AD)
requires the [high frequency eddy current and a low frequency phase
analysis eddy current] inspection [for cracking, discrete surface
damage, and discontinuity (corrosion and mechanical damage)] and, as
necessary, repair of the airbrake upper crossbeam.
The required actions include replacing the three rivets with Hi-
lok pins. For cracking, damage, or discontinuity that is outside
certain limits defined in the service bulletin, the repair includes
contacting BAE Systems (Operations) Limited for repair instructions
and doing the repair.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
(1) At the applicable time specified in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and
(f)(1)(ii) of this AD, inspect for cracking, damage, and
discontinuity of the airbrake upper crossbeam fastener positions and
lightening holes; and replace the three rivets with Hi-lok pins; in
accordance with paragraphs 2.B., 2.C., and 2.D. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-200, Revision 1, dated March 13,
2007. If any crack, damage, or discontinuity is found: Before
further flight, repair as required by paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
(i) For airplanes that have not been inspected in accordance
with BAE Systems (Operations) Limited MRBR SSI Task No. 53-40-125
(MPD Reference 534025-DVI-10000-1) as of the effective date of this
AD, do the inspection prior to accumulating 20,000 total flight
cycles or 500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(ii) For airplanes subject to MRBR and SSID requirements that
have been inspected in accordance with BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited MRBR SSI Task No. 53-40-125 (MPD Reference 534025-DVI-10000-
1) as of the effective date of this AD, do the inspection at the
latest of the times in paragraphs (f)(1)(ii)(A), (f)(1)(ii)(B), or
(f)(1)(ii)(C) of this AD.
(A) Before the accumulation of 4,000 flight cycles since last
inspection.
(B) Within 2,500 flight cycles (for MRBR airplanes), or within
1,000 flight cycles (for SSID airplanes) after the effective date of
this AD; but not exceeding 8,000 flight cycles since the last
inspection.
(C) Within 500 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD.
(2) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this
AD thereafter at the applicable time specified in paragraph
(f)(2)(i), (f)(2)(ii), or (f)(2)(iii) of this AD. If any crack,
damage, or discontinuity is found: Before further flight, repair as
required by paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
(i) Inspect fastener positions at the rivet locations at
intervals not to exceed 4,000 flight cycles.
(ii) Inspect the holes at Hi-lok pin locations at intervals not
to exceed 12,000 flight cycles.
(iii) Inspect the lightening holes at intervals not to exceed
12,000 flight cycles.
(3) If any crack, damage, or discontinuity is found during any
inspection required by this AD: Before further flight, do the repair
in accordance with paragraph 2.E. of the Accomplishment Instructions
of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection Service Bulletin
ISB.53-200, Revision 1, dated March 13, 2007.
(4) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.53-200, dated December 21, 2006, are considered
acceptable for compliance with the corresponding action specified in
this AD.
[[Page 41607]]
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn: Todd
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2007-0307, dated December 17, 2007; and BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-200,
Revision 1, dated March 13, 2007; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53-200, Revision 1, dated March 13, 2007, to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact BAE
Systems Regional Aircraft, 13850 McLearen Road, Herndon, Virginia
20171; telephone 703-736-1080; e-mail raebusiness@baesystems.com;
Internet https://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 4, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-19442 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P