Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request Marketing Fax Back Response Form, 41432-41434 [E9-19699]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
41432
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 157 / Monday, August 17, 2009 / Notices
and nongovernmental decision-makers,
at all levels, in planning and executing
activities required for response and
recovery from a biological incident in a
domestic, civilian setting. The objective
of this guidance is to provide federal,
state, local, and tribal decision makers
with uniform federal guidance to protect
the public, emergency responders, and
surrounding environments and to
ensure that local and federal first
responders can prepare for an incident
involving biological contamination.
This document follows principles
developed within the context of
Planning Guidance for Protection and
Recovery Following Radiological
Dispersal Device (RDD) and Improvised
Nuclear Device (IND) Incidents—which
was published by the U.S. Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) on August
1, 2008. The RDD/IND document
introduced the overarching concept of
optimization. Optimization is a flexible,
multi-attribute decision process that
seeks to weigh many factors.
Optimization analyses are qualitative
and quantitative assessments applied at
each stage of decision-making process
from evaluation of decontamination
options to implementation of the chosen
alternative.
The subject draft guidance applies to
characterization, decontamination,
clearance, and potential reoccupancy of
a variety of public facilities, drinking
water infrastructure, and open areas.
Principal topics include the unique
characteristics and hazards of biological
agents, a risk management framework
for responding to a biological incident,
and implications for remediation
activities. A process is provided for
making timely and effective decisions
despite incomplete data and
uncertainties associated with potential
risks posed by biological agents. This
decision process includes all actions
required during response to a biological
incident beginning with notification,
screening, and environmental sampling.
Each step in the decision-making
process is described, and the various
actions are explicitly linked to
numbered boxes in a five-page decisiontree flowchart.
An important step in the decision
process is setting clearance (or cleanup)
goals for determining whether a
remediation is successful and how the
treated area may be used. No formula is
available for setting clearance goals for
biological agents. The collective,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:55 Aug 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
professional judgment of experts,
considered within the context of the
concerns of a broad range of local,
regional, and federal stakeholders
should be used to set a clearance goal
appropriate to the site-specific
circumstances. A practical clearance
goal is to reduce residual risk to levels
acceptable by employing an
optimization process. The aim of such a
process is to reduce exposure levels as
low as is reasonable while considering
potential future land uses, technical
feasibility, costs and cost effectiveness,
and public acceptability. After the
remediation is carried out, a clearance
decision is made based on a judgment
whether the decontamination
verification criteria and the clearance
goals have been met. This judgment is
based on a thorough analysis of all
sampling, processes, and other pertinent
data.
This draft document focuses on the
decision making framework in response
to a biological event. It is designed to be
consistent with the National Response
Framework (Department of Homeland
Security, January 2008) and our
scientific understanding of the
characteristics of biological agents.
Neither of these areas is static. We
expect both our response planning and
our scientific understanding of the
characteristics of biological agents to
evolve over time.
Response to Comments
Comments will be reviewed by the
White House National Science and
Technology Council before this
guidance is republished.
Availability of the Draft Guidance
Copies of the draft guidance are
available for review through https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket number:
EPA–HQ–ORD–2009–0331.
Dated: July 27, 2009.
James Kohlenberger,
Chief of Staff, Office of Science and
Technology Policy, Executive Office of the
President.
Bradley I. Buswell,
Undersecretary for Science and Technology
(Acting), U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
Lek G. Kadeli,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Research
and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
[FR Doc. E9–19688 Filed 8–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.
[Public Notice 123]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request Marketing Fax Back
Response Form
Export-Import Bank of the U.S.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank
invites the general public and other
Federal Agencies to comment on the
proposed information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. The Marketing Fax Back
Response Form will be used to collect
basic trade information about United
States companies. This information will
be provided to the Export Import Bank’s
finance consultants nationwide to assist
in providing counsel to exporters.
DATES: Electronic comments may be
submitted through Regulations.Gov.
Comments must be received on or
before September 16, 2009 to be
considered.
ADDRESSES: Direct all comments and
requests for additional information to
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20038.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title and Form Number: Marketing
Fax Back Response Form EIB 05–01.
OMB Number: 3048-.
Type of Review: Regular.
Need and Use: This form will provide
basic trade information about U.S.
Companies and will provide the Export
Import Bank’s trade finance consultants
nationwide the ability to provide
counsel to exporters.
Affected Public: The form affects
entities involved in the export of U.S.
goods and services.
Estimated Annual Respondents:
1,500.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 5
minutes.
Estimated Annual Burden: 125 hours.
Frequency of Reporting or Use: One
time for registration
Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
BILLING CODE 6690–01–P
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:55 Aug 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
41433
EN17AU09.012</GPH>
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 157 / Monday, August 17, 2009 / Notices
41434
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 157 / Monday, August 17, 2009 / Notices
BILLING CODE 6690–01–C
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collections Being Submitted for
Review to the Office of Management
and Budget, Comments Requested
Federal Communications
Commision.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:55 Aug 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
DATES: Persons wishing to comments on
this information collection should
submit comments on September 16,
2009. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), (202)
395–5887, or via fax at (202) 395–5167,
or via the Internet at
Nocholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and
to Cathy Williams, Federal
Communications Commission (FCC),
Room 1–C823, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, D.C. 20554. To submit your
comments by e–mail send them to:
PRA@fcc.gov and to
Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. To view a copy
of this information collection request
(ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go to web
page: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the
web page called ’’Currently Under
Review’’, (3) click on the downward–
pointing arrow in the ’’Select Agency’’
box below the ’’Currently Under
Review’’ heading, (4) select ’’Federal
Communications Commission’’ from the
list of agencies presented in the ’’Select
Agency’’ box, (5) click the ’’Submit’’
button to the right of the ’’Select
Agency’’ box, and (6) when the FCC list
appears, look for the title of this ICR (or
its OMB Control Number, if there is one)
and then click on the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
information collection(s) send an e–mail
to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Cathy
Williams on (202) 418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–1115.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Title: DTV Consumer Education
Initiative; Section 73.674; FCC Form
388.
Form Number: FCC Form 388.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for–
profit entities; Not–for–profit
institutions; State, local or tribal
governments.
Number of Respondent and
Responses: 200 respondents; 1,800
responses.
Estimated time per Response: 0.50
hours – 85 hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement; Quarterly
reporting requirement; Third party
disclosure requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain benefits. The statutory authority
for this collection of information is
contained in Sections 4(i), 303(r), 335,
and 336 of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i),
303(r), 335, and 336.
Total Annual Burden: 10,940 hours.
Total Annual Cost: None.
Confidentiality: No need for
confidentiality required with this
collection of information.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: After the nationwide
DTV transition date of June 12, 2009,
full–power television broadcast stations
must transmit only digital signals, and
may no longer transmit analog signals,
except for limited analog ‘‘nightlight’’
service. The DTV Delay Act directs the
Commission to take any actions
‘‘necessary or appropriate to implement
the provisions, and carry out the
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
EN17AU09.013</GPH>
[FR Doc. E9–19699 Filed 8–14–09; 8:45 am]
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 157 (Monday, August 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41432-41434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19699]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.
[Public Notice 123]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request Marketing Fax Back Response Form
AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank invites the general public and other
Federal Agencies to comment on the proposed information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The Marketing Fax Back
Response Form will be used to collect basic trade information about
United States companies. This information will be provided to the
Export Import Bank's finance consultants nationwide to assist in
providing counsel to exporters.
DATES: Electronic comments may be submitted through Regulations.Gov.
Comments must be received on or before September 16, 2009 to be
considered.
ADDRESSES: Direct all comments and requests for additional information
to Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20038.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title and Form Number: Marketing Fax Back Response Form EIB 05-01.
OMB Number: 3048-.
Type of Review: Regular.
Need and Use: This form will provide basic trade information about
U.S. Companies and will provide the Export Import Bank's trade finance
consultants nationwide the ability to provide counsel to exporters.
Affected Public: The form affects entities involved in the export
of U.S. goods and services.
Estimated Annual Respondents: 1,500.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 5 minutes.
Estimated Annual Burden: 125 hours.
Frequency of Reporting or Use: One time for registration
Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
[[Page 41433]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17AU09.012
[[Page 41434]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17AU09.013
[FR Doc. E9-19699 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-C
