General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; GSAR Case 2006-G501, Mentor-Protégé Program, 41060-41067 [E9-19482]

Download as PDF 41060 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 156 / Friday, August 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations under Colorado, is amended by adding DTV channel 49 and removing DTV channel 10 at Colorado Springs. Clay C. Pendarvis, Associate Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission. [FR Doc. E9–19525 Filed 8–13–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 41 CFR Part 102–36 [FMR Amendment 2009–05; FMR Case 2009–102–2; Docket 2009–0002, Sequence 4] RIN 3090–AI87 Federal Management Regulation; FMR Case 2009–102–2; Disposition of Excess Personal Property AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services Administration (GSA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The General Services Administration is amending the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) by making a change to its personal property policy. This final rule updates and clarifies language that has caused some confusion with our customers and resulted in unnecessarily prolonged periods to remove property. DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on August 14, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, contact Mr. Robert Holcombe, Office of Governmentwide Policy, Office of Travel, Transportation, and Asset Management (MT), (202) 501–3828 or e-mail at robert.holcombe@gsa.gov. For information pertaining to status or publication schedules contact the Regulatory Secretariat, 1800 F Street, NW., Room 4041, Washington, DC, 20405, (202) 501–4755. Please cite FMR case 2009–102–2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES A. Background A proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on February 23, 2009 (74 FR 14510) to solicit comments on a proposed change to FMR section 102– 36.135 (41 CFR 102–36.135). The language used in that section caused confusion with our customers and resulted in unnecessarily prolonged removal periods. The proposed revision would make it clear that the acquiring agency is responsible for scheduling and VerDate Nov<24>2008 20:51 Aug 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 coordinating the property removal once the acquiring agency receives notification from GSA that they have been allocated the property. No comments were received. B. Executive Order 12866 This final rule is excepted from the definition of ‘‘regulation’’ or ‘‘rule’’ under Section 3(d)(3) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993 and, therefore, was not subject to review under Section 6(b) of that Executive Order. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act This final rule was not required to be published in the Federal Register for comment. Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply. However, a proposed rule was published on February 23, 2009 in order to elicit comments and to provide transparency in the promulgation of federal policies. D. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to the FMR do not impose information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. E. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act This final rule is exempt from Congressional review under 5 U.S.C. 801 since it relates solely to agency management and personnel. List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 102–36 Government property, property disposal. Dated: July 15, 2009. Paul F. Prouty, Acting Administrator of General Services. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, GSA amends 41 CFR part 102–36 as set forth below: ■ PART 102–36—DISPOSITION OF EXCESS PERSONAL PROPERTY 1. The authority citation for 41 CFR part 102–36 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c). 2. Revise § 102–36.135 to read as follows: ■ § 102–36.135 How much time do we have to pick up excess personal property that has been approved for transfer? Normally, you have 15 calendar days from the date of GSA allocation to pick up the excess personal property for transfer, and you are responsible for PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 scheduling and coordinating the property removal with the holding agency. If additional removal time is required, you are responsible for requesting such additional removal time. [FR Doc. E9–19481 Filed 8–13–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–14–P GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 48 CFR Parts 501, 519, and 552 [GSAR Amendment 2009–09; GSAR Case 2006–G501 (Change 37) Docket 2008–0007; Sequence 6] RIN 3090–AI56 General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; GSAR Case ´ ´ 2006–G501, Mentor-Protege Program AGENCIES: General Services Administration (GSA), Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is amending the General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to amend its acquisition regulations to formally encourage GSA prime contractors to assist small business, including veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteranowned small business, HUBZone, small disadvantaged business, and womenowned small business, in enhancing their capabilities to perform contracts and subcontracts for GSA and other Federal agencies. The program seeks to increase the base of small business eligible to perform GSA contracts and subcontracts. The program also seeks to foster long-term business relationships between GSA prime contractors and small business entities and to increase the overall number of small business entities that receive GSA contracts, and subcontract awards. DATES: Effective Date: September 14, 2009. Applicability Date: The final rule applies to solicitations and existing contracts for supplies or services, including Federal Supply Schedules and construction. Existing contracts shall be modified at no cost to the Government by mutual agreement of both parties. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, contact Ms. Rhonda Cundiff, Procurement Analyst, at (202) 501–0044. For information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 156 / Friday, August 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations Secretariat (VPR), Room 4041, 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20405, (202) 501–4755. Please cite Amendment 2009–09, GSAR case 2006–G501 (Change 37). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES A. Background The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register at 73 FR 32669, June 10, 2008), in which GSA proposed to ´ ´ develop a Mentor-Protege Program that encouraged GSA prime contractors to assist small business, including small disadvantaged business, veteran-owned, service-disabled veteran-owned, HUBZone, and women-owned small business in enhancing their capabilities to perform contracts and subcontracts for GSA and other Federal agencies. ´ ´ Successful Mentor-Protege arrangements represent opportunities for creating access for small business to GSA contracts and awards. GSA received comments on the proposed rule suggesting the Agency clarify the eligible participants in the Program and the types of incentives GSA may provide to prime contractors for providing developmental assistance to ´ ´ proteges. After careful consideration of the public comments received on the notice of proposed rulemaking, GSA is issuing a final rule. Resolution of Comments Twelve commenters submitted comments in response to the proposed rule. Three of the twelve commenters expressed interest in participating in the ´ ´ GSA Mentor-Protege Program. A discussion of the comments and the changes made to the rule as a result of those comments is provided below. Comment: One commenter recommends that the word ‘‘small’’ needs to be defined. Large businesses ‘‘hide’’ behind small businesses. Response: Non-concur. The comment is outside the scope of this GSAR case. With the exception of small disadvantaged businesses, 8(a) Participants and HUBZone small business concerns, all other firms selfcertify in accordance with the definitions in FAR Part 2. Comment: A commenter states that incentives are insufficient and suggests monetary reimbursement for mentoring expenses, limited ownership interest in ´ ´ the protege, or relaxation of small business affiliation rule. Response: Non-concur. GSA does not have legal authority to incorporate the incentives suggested by the commenter. GSAM 519.7004, Incentive for Prime Contract Participation, is consistent VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:09 Aug 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 ´ ´ with the Mentor-Protege Programs of other civilian agencies. Comment: Two commenters recommend better monitoring of the ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Programs. Response: GSA is not responsible for the experiences of other Federal agency ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Programs and plans to carefully monitor the GSA Mentor´ ´ Protege Program. GSA anticipates having a very successful program that will be beneficial to both mentors and ´ ´ proteges. Comment: Under GSAM 519.7003, General Policy, a commenter recommends the need to address how ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Agreements can be incorporated into small business prime awards and how evaluation credit during source selection is given to small business firms that are mentors with small business subcontractors. Response: Concur. As with other terms and conditions that need incorporation into a contract, the ´ ´ Mentor-Protege agreement should be incorporated into the small business prime contractor’s contract. In addition, there is nothing in the FAR or GSAR that precludes establishing source selection criteria that would apply to both large and small businesses. Comment: One commenter states that GSAR 519.7004, paragraph (b) does not appear to belong in this section since it points out that the mentor’s cost are not reimbursable directly but may be reimbursable once indirect cost rates are established with the cognizant audit agency. How does this relate to incentives for mentors? Response: Non-concur. The civilian agencies do not have the statutory authority that the Department of ´ ´ Defense has for its Mentor-Protege Program; therefore, civilian agency incentives are limited. GSAM 519.7004, Incentive for Prime Contract Participation, is consistent with the ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Programs of other civilian agencies. Comment: One commenter requests specific details about the non-monetary award in GSAM 519.7004(d). In addition, the commenter questions why the GSA annual conference in GSAM 519.7004(e) is listed as an incentive and states that overall there are no true incentives offered for the time and effort the Mentor Program would require. Response: Non-concur. GSA will provide the specifics of the nonmonetary award at a later date. The civilian agencies do not have the statutory authority that the Department of Defense has; therefore, the incentives for civilian agencies are limited. The GSA annual conference is an opportunity to network, share Mentor- PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 41061 ´ ´ Protege experiences and share the ‘‘Lessons Learned’’. GSAM 519.7004, Incentive for Prime Contract Participation, is consistent with the ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Programs of other civilian agencies. Comment: A commenter questions indirect costs and states that these costs are generally established for cost contracts and certain special fixed price contracts. The references for indirect cost rates seem to be entirely out of place and would often be inapplicable to many competitive firm fixed GSA contracts. Response: Non-concur. Even though this paragraph may not apply to many GSA contracts, this is a GSA-wide ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program that can include contracts that may have indirect costs associated with it. The intent of ´ ´ the GSA Mentor-Protege Program is to not exclude any potential GSA contracts, including GSA cost contracts. Comment: One commenter refers to FAR 15.101–1 which discusses the trade-off process. The commenter states that the natural implication is that the evaluation credit is not applicable to lowest-price technically acceptable source selection, given that tradeoffs are not permitted in that scenario and should be clearly stated, for it substantially limits the circumstance under which this incentive could be applied. The commenter further states that careful distinction is required since the same paragraph goes on to state that past compliance with subcontracting plans can be considered as part of past performance evaluation (trade-off scenario) but also as part of Responsibility Determinations which are made regardless of whether the trade-off or LPTA scenario is used so the paragraph is unclear in regard to the distinction between the two types of source selection. Response: Non-concur. The FAR clearly explains how the trade-off process is utilized. The GSAR language at 519.7004(c) states that the contracting officer ‘‘may’’ give mentors evaluation credit under FAR 15.101–1 considerations for subcontracts which means that it may not be used in all cases. Comment: Regarding GSAM 519.7005, one commenter suggests that the regulation address how measurement of the program success within the first year ´ ´ of the agreement if a Protege has not received a contract award or dollars. Depending on the terms of the agreement, the first year of the program may involve only development or training; therefore, contract awards may not be immediate. E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 41062 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 156 / Friday, August 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations ´ ´ Response: The GSA Mentor-Protege Program will not be measured only on the contract award and dollars. The measurement of success will include developmental assistance given to the ´ ´ Protege as required by the Mentor´ ´ Protege Program. Comment: One commenter requests clarification on GSAM 519.7006 and 519.7009. GSAM 519.7009 indicates that a large business mentor’s application must include a statement that the firm is currently performing under at least one active approved subcontracting plan. However, GSAM 519.7006 states that mentors must either currently be operating under an approved subcontracting plan under a negotiated award or must have operated under one for a contract awarded within the past five years. Response: Concur. The language has been revised to state that the large business mentor must currently be performing under an approved subcontracting plan. The language ‘‘or has performed under at least one approved subcontracting plan awarded under a negotiated contract within the last five years’’ has been deleted. Comment: A commenter believes that GSAM 519.7003(c) is vague and recommends that the provision be changed to state that an active mentor´ ´ protege arrangement requires the ´ ´ protege to already be or become a subcontractor under a GSA contract of the mentor firm that contains a subcontracting plan. This revision will then be in agreement with GSAM 519.7009(b). Response: Concur. The language in GSAM 519.7003(c) has been revised. Comment: One commenter recommends that the GSAM language be clear to indicate that this section includes schedules. Response: Concur. Adopted comment. Comment: One commenter states that GSAM 519.7004(c) does not clearly elaborate on the incentives and the associated specifics. The commenter further states that the current language does not mention that the mentor can take credit for costs incurred by the ´ ´ mentor. Other Federal mentor-protege programs allow the mentor to subsequently receive credit towards their subcontracting plan based on the amount invested. This section combines ´ ´ mentor-protege performance with small business subcontracting plan compliance which are totally separate elements. Commenter recommends adding language that explicitly describes the incentive as follows: ‘‘future solicitations contain a source selection factor or subfactor regarding ´ ´ the participation in the Mentor-Protege VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:09 Aug 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 Program. In order to receive credit under source selection factor or subfactor, the offeror shall provide a ´ ´ signed letter of mentor-protege agreement approval before initial evaluation of proposals. The contracting officer may, in his or her discretion, give credit for approvals that occur after the initial evaluation of proposals, but before final evaluation’’. (Currently in DHS and NASA’s programs). Response: Non-concur. With the exception of instances of allowing indirect costs, costs incurred by the mentor are not allowable. Comment: A commenter suggests adding language that enables the mentor to take credit for the developmental assistance provided and how this credit can be applied. Suggested language: ‘‘Mentors are eligible to take post-award incentive for subcontracting plan credit whereby the mentor will receive credit towards its subcontracting plan for costs it incurs to provide assistance to a ´ ´ protege firm. The mentor may use this additional credit toward achievement of its goal under the same or another GSA subcontracting plan. GSA may wish to adjust the credit factor as it sees fit, but it is a federal agency best practice as represented at DOD, DHS, NASA, and others to explicitly state how the benefit and credit is determined.’’ Response: GSA does not concur. GSA believes that the incentives in GSAM 519.7004, ‘‘Incentives for prime contractors,’’ that includes coverage whereby mentors may be reimbursed for their indirect costs are sufficient incentives. Comment: One commenter recommends removing GSAM 519.7004(c)(2) in its entirety. Response: Non-concur. The commenter provides no rationale for its removal. GSA believes that this subparagraph is an incentive for prime contractor participation. Comment: A commenter recommends that GSA, if not at inception, then at a later date, to provide greater elaboration and detail regarding the criteria for the OSBU mentoring award. Response: Concur. After implementation of the GSA Mentor´ ´ Protege Program, the Associate Administrator of the Office of Small Business Utilization (OSBU), will be responsible for developing the criteria for the OSBU mentoring award. Comment: One commenter states that GSAM 519.7009 as currently proposed combines elements of a Mentor Application process and a Mentor´ ´ Protege agreement submittal process. It ´ ´ implies that for each protege agreement, a mentor submit an application. These two elements should be completely PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 separate as consistent with other Federal agency practices and procedures. The application for the mentor should not contain requests for ´ ´ the number of proposed mentor-protege arrangements as cited in GSAM 519.7009(b)(2) since it is not known how many will be developed in outlying years. In addition, the specifics on the type of developmental assistance GSAM 519.7009(b)(5) to be provided, or that a signed letter of intent by the mentor and ´ ´ protege GSAM 519.7009(b)(6) be required are not truly indicative of a prime contractor’s eligibility as a mentor. They are elements germane to the development of a specific mentor´ ´ protege agreement and should be incorporated into the ensuing section. By separating the mentor application process from the agreement submittal process, industry and Government are given the flexibility in the future to ´ ´ ´ ´ efficiently add a protege or proteges as long as it is in good standing both as a prime contractor and mentor. This will result in a reduction in the amount of paperwork and time saving for the Government. Response: Non-concur. Initially, in the proposed rule, GSA had the application and the agreement as separate submissions. However, GSA has determined that it would be less burdensome on both the contractors and GSA personnel to have the application and agreement combined. This is ´ ´ consistent with Mentor-Protege Programs of other Federal agencies, such as USAID and Department of Homeland Security. Comment: One commenter recommends deletion of GSAM 519.7009(b)(2) requiring mentors to state ´ ´ the number of proposed protege arrangements at the time of mentor ´ ´ application review and mentor-protege agreement process. Response: Non-concur. GSA is ´ ´ interested in how many proteges the mentor plans to develop. Comment: Delete GSAM 519.7009(b)(6) requiring a letter of intent be signed by the prospective ´ ´ mentor and protege at the time of mentor application submittal. This should be a requirement at the time of ´ ´ mentor-protege submittal. Response: Concur. The final rule now combines the application and agreement. Therefore, the letter of intent is unnecessary. Comment: A commenter recommends adding a section in the mentor application for prospective mentors to provide information on their previous participation in Federal agency mentor´ ´ protege programs. Should the prospective mentor not have any prior E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 156 / Friday, August 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations experience, they should describe the entity’s ability to provide developmental assistance and how that assistance will potentially increase subcontracting opportunities for ´ ´ proteges. This should be inserted under GSAM 519.7009. Response: Non-concur. The GSA ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program stands independently. GSA will be evaluating ´ ´ the mentor-protege relationship on its own merits. Having experience (positive ´ ´ or negative) on other mentor-protege programs would not add value and would increase the paperwork burden on the contractor. Comment: Commenter encourages GSA to review and consider the current ´ ´ mentor-protege application process and forms of those currently in practice at NASA, DOD or DHS as a baseline. Response: GSA has reviewed and considered other agencies’ mentor´ ´ protege application processes and forms and has chosen the most appropriate to suit GSA’s needs. Comment: Section 519.7017 provides guidance for contracting officers to insert this clause. It seems to imply that will be only for new contracts with no clear guidance regarding the GSA contracts already in place. This will limit the ability for participation by industry at the onset, thus limiting the potential short-term impact and success. Recommend that GSA give clear guidance or instructions as to how existing contracts can be modified to incorporate these new clauses in order to facilitate industry participated once initiated. Response: Concur. GSA did not intend for current contractors to be excluded from participation in the ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program. GSAM 519.7017 does not need a revision as it states to insert the clause in all contracts and is not stating newly awarded contracts. The Federal Register Notice indicates that the final rule applies to current contracts. Comment: Two commenters recommend that GSA amend its rule to include language defining non-profit agencies (NPAs) for people who are blind or have severe disabilities authorized by the Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or ´ ´ Severely disabled as protege firms in Section 519.7007(a). Response: Non-concur. The Small Business Administration regulation, 13 CFR 121.105(a)(1) states: ‘‘Except for small agricultural cooperatives, a business concern eligible for assistance from SBA as a small business is a business entity organized for profit, with a place of business located in the United States, and which operates VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:09 Aug 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 primarily within the United States or which makes a significant contribution to the U.S. economy through payment of taxes or use of American products, materials or labor.’’ This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., applies to this final rule. The changes may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., GSA prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), and it is summarized as follows: ´ ´ The GSA Mentor-Protege Program will ´ ´ allow small businesses to become proteges and receive developmental assistance from large business mentors. The GSA Mentor´ ´ Protege Program also will allow small businesses who want to mentor other small businesses to participate in the program to provide developmental assistance to ´ ´ proteges. This Program encourages fostering the establishment of long-term business relationships between these small business entities and GSA prime contractors. It is expected that the Program will increase the overall number of small business entities that receive GSA contract and subcontract awards. Interested parties may obtain a copy of the FRFA from the Regulatory Secretariat. The Regulatory Secretariat will be submitting a copy of the FRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does apply; however, these changes to the FAR do not impose additional information collection requirements to the paperwork burden previously approved under OMB Control Number 3090–0286. List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 501, 519, and 552 Government procurement. Dated: August 7, 2009. Rodney P. Lantier, Acting Senior Procurement Executive, and Acting Deputy Chief Acquisition Officer, Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer, General Services Administration. Therefore, GSA amends 48 CFR parts 501, 519, and 552 as set forth below: ■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 501, 519, and 552 continues to read as follows: ■ PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 41063 Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c). PART 501—GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM 2. Amend section 501.106, in the table, by adding, in numerical sequence, GSAR References ‘‘519.70’’, ‘‘552.219– 75’’, ‘‘552.219–76’’ and their corresponding OMB Control Number ‘‘3090–0286’’. ■ PART 519—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS 3. Add Subpart 519.70, consisting of sections 519.7001 through 519.7017, to read as follows: ■ ´ ´ Subpart 519.70—GSA Mentor-Protege Program Sec. 519.7001 519.7002 519.7003 519.7004 519.7005 519.7006 519.7007 519.7008 519.7009 519.7010 519.7011 519.7012 519.7013 519.7014 519.7015 519.7016 519.7017 Scope of subpart. Definitions. General policy. Incentives for prime contractors. Measurement of program success. Mentor firms. ´ ´ Protege firms. ´ ´ Selection of protege firms. Application process. Agreement contents. Application review. Developmental assistance. Obligation. Internal controls. Reports. Program review. Contract clauses. ´ ´ Subpart 519.70—GSA Mentor-Protege Program 519.7001 Scope of subpart. ´ ´ The GSA Mentor-Protege Program is designed to encourage and motivate GSA prime contractors to assist small businesses concerns, small disadvantaged businesses concerns, women-owned small businesses concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteranowned small businesses concerns, and HUBZone small businesses concerns, and enhance their capability of performing successfully on GSA contracts and subcontracts, foster the establishment of long-term business relationships between these small business entities and GSA prime contractors, and increase the overall number of small business entities that receive GSA contract and subcontract awards. 519.7002 Definitions. The definitions of small business concern, small disadvantaged business concern, HUBZone small business concern, women-owned small business concern, veteran-owned small business E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1 41064 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 156 / Friday, August 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations concern, and service-disabled veteranowned small business concern are the same as found in FAR 2.101. Also see 13 CFR 121, 124, 125 and 126. (a) Mentor as used in the GSA Mentor´ ´ Protege Program, is a prime contractor that elects, on a specific GSA contract, to promote and develop small business subcontractors by providing developmental assistance designed to enhance the business success of the ´ ´ protege. ´ ´ (b) Mentor-Protege Program Manager means an employee in the Office of Small Business Utilization (OSBU) (E) designated by the Associate Administrator of OSBU to manage the ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program. ´ ´ (c) Protege as used in the GSA ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program is a small business concern that is the recipient of developmental assistance pursuant to a ´ ´ mentor-protege arrangement on a specific GSA contract. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 519.7003 General policy. (a) A large business prime contractor that meets the requirements at section 519.7006, and is approved as a mentor ´ ´ firm by the Mentor-Protege Program Manager, may enter into an Agreement with a small business concern, small disadvantaged business concern, women-owned small business concern, veteran-owned small business concern, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern or HUBZone small business concern that meets the ´ ´ requirements for being a protege (see 519.7007) in order to provide appropriate developmental assistance to ´ ´ enhance the capabilities of the protege to perform successfully as a subcontractor and supplier. (b) A small business prime contractor that is capable of providing ´ ´ developmental assistance to proteges, may also be approved as a mentor. ´ ´ (c) An active mentor-protege ´ ´ arrangement requires the protege to either be a current or newly selected subcontractor under the mentor’s prime contract with GSA. (d) A small business concern’s status ´ ´ as a protege under a GSA contract shall not have an effect on its ability to seek other prime contracts or subcontracts. (e) Potential Mentors may submit an application for admittance to the ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program at any time as long as the requirements at section 519.7006 are met. (f) The determination of affiliation is a function of the SBA. 519.7004 Incentives for prime contractors. (a) Under the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(E), the GSA is authorized to provide appropriate VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:09 Aug 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 incentives to prime contractors in order to encourage subcontracting opportunities for small business concerns consistent with the efficient and economical performance of the contract. This authority is limited to negotiated procurements, including the GSA Multiple Award Schedule contracts and the GSA Governmentwide Acquisition Contracts. It does not include orders under any GSA contracts. (b) Costs incurred by a mentor to provide developmental assistance, as described in section 519.7012 to fulfill the terms of their agreement(s) with a ´ ´ protege firm(s), are not reimbursable as a direct cost under a GSA contract. If GSA is the mentor’s responsible audit agency under FAR 42.703–1, GSA will consider these costs in determining indirect cost rates. If GSA is not the responsible audit agency, mentors are encouraged to enter into an advance agreement with their responsible audit agency on the treatment of such costs when determining indirect cost rates. (c) In addition to paragraph (b) of this section, contracting officers may give mentors evaluation credit during the source selection process for subcontracts awarded under their subcontracting plans pursuant to their ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Agreements. (See FAR 15.101–1). Therefore: (1) Contracting officers may evaluate proposals with subcontracting plans ´ ´ containing Mentor-Protege Agreements more favorably than proposals with subcontracting plans that do not include ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Agreements; and (2) Contracting officers may assess the prime contractor’s compliance with the subcontracting plans submitted in previous contracts as a factor in evaluating past performance under certain circumstances (see FAR 15.304(c)(3) and 15.305(a)(2)(v)) and determining contractor responsibility FAR section 19.705–5(a)(1). (d) OSBU Mentoring Award. A nonmonetary award may be presented annually to the mentoring firm providing the most effective ´ ´ developmental support of a protege. The ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program Manager will recommend an award winner to the Administrator of GSA. ´ ´ (e) OSBU Mentor-Protege Annual Conference. At the conclusion of each ´ ´ year in the Mentor-Protege Program, mentor firms will be invited to brief contracting officers, program leaders, office directors, and other guests on their experience and progress under the Program. Participation is voluntary. PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 519.7005 Measurement of program success. The overall success of the GSA ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program encompassing ´ ´ all participating mentors and proteges will be measured by the extent to which it results in: (a) An increase in the number, dollar value, and percentage of subcontracts ´ ´ awarded to proteges by mentor firms under GSA contracts since the date of entry into the Program. The baseline that demonstrates an increase is determined by comparing the number and total dollar amount of subcontract ´ ´ awards made to the identified protege firm(s) during the two preceding fiscal years (if any) that are listed in application; (b) An increase in the number and dollar value of contract and subcontract awards (including percentage of ´ ´ subcontract awards) to protege firms ´ ´ since the date of the protege’s entry into the Program (under GSA contracts and contracts awarded by other Federal agencies); (c) An increase in the number and dollar value of subcontracts awarded to ´ ´ a protege firm by its mentor firm; and (d) An increase in subcontracting with ´ ´ protege firms in industry categories where they have not traditionally participated within the mentor firm’s ´ ´ activity (i.e., the protege is expanding its field of expertise or is increasing its opportunities in areas where it has not traditionally performed). (e) Assessments of the semi-annual reports submitted by the mentors and ‘‘Lessons Learned’’ evaluation ´ ´ submitted by the mentors and proteges ´ ´ to the GSA Mentor-Protege Program Manager. 519.7006 Mentor firms. (a) Mentors must be: (1) A large business prime contractor that is currently performing under an approved subcontracting plan as required by FAR 19.7 - Small business mentors are exempted; or (2) A small business prime contractor that can provide developmental assistance to enhance the capabilities of ´ ´ proteges to perform as contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers; (b) Must be eligible (not listed in the ‘‘Excluded Parties List System’’) for U.S. Government contracts and not excluded ´ ´ from the Mentor-Protege Program under section 519.7014(b); (c) Must be able to provide developmental assistance that will ´ ´ enhance the ability of proteges to perform as contractors and subcontractors; and E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 156 / Friday, August 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations (d) Must provide semi-annual reports detailing the assistance provided and ´ ´ the cost incurred in supporting proteges. 519.7007 ´ ´ Protege firms. 519.7009 ´ ´ (a) For selection as a protege, a firm must be: (1) A small business concern, small disadvantaged business concern, veteran-owned small business concern, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern, HUBZone small business concern, or women-owned small business concern; (2) Small for the NAICS code the prime contractor/mentor assigns to the subcontract; and (3) Eligible (not listed in the ‘‘Excluded Parties List System’’) for U.S. Government contracts and not excluded ´ ´ from the Mentor-Protege Program under section 519.7014(b). ´ ´ (b) A protege firm may self-represent to a mentor firm that it meets the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. Mentors may check the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) at www.ccr.gov to verify that the self´ ´ representation of the potential protege meets the specified small business and socioeconomic category eligibility requirements (see FAR 19.703(b) and (d)). HUBZone and small disadvantaged business status eligibility and documentation requirements are determined according to 13 CFR Parts 124 and 126. ´ ´ (c) A protege firm must not have ´ ´ another formal, active mentor-protege relationship under GSA’s Mentor´ ´ Protege Program but may have an active ´ ´ mentor-protege relationship under another agency’s program. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 519.7008 ´ ´ Selection of protege firms. (a) Mentor firms will be solely ´ ´ responsible for selecting protege firms. Mentors are encouraged to select from a broad base of small business concerns including small disadvantaged business concerns, women-owned small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteranowned small business concerns, and HUBZone small business concerns. A ´ ´ protege must be either a current subcontractor or a newly selected subcontractor for the prime contractor’s GSA contract. (b) Mentor firms may have more than ´ ´ one protege. GSA reserves the right to ´ ´ limit the number of proteges participating under each mentor firm. ´ ´ (c) The selection of protege firms by mentor firms is not protestable, except for a protest regarding the size or eligibility status of an entity selected by ´ ´ a mentor to be a protege. Such protests shall be handled in accordance with VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:09 Aug 13, 2009 FAR 19.703(b). The contracting officer shall notify the Office of Small Business Utilization (OSBU) of the protest. Jkt 217001 Application process. (a) Prime contractors interested in becoming a mentor firm must apply in writing by submitting the GSA Form ´ ´ 3695 to the GSA Mentor-Protege Program Manager, at GSA Office of Small Business Utilization (E), Washington, DC 20405. The Application ´ ´ shall include the Mentor-Protege Agreement and will be evaluated for approval based on the extent to which the company plans to provide developmental assistance. (b) The application must contain: (1) A statement that the mentor firm is currently performing under at least one active approved subcontracting plan (small business exempted) and the firm is eligible, as of the date of Application, for the award of Federal contracts; ´ ´ (2) The number of proposed protege arrangements; (3) Data on all current GSA contracts, and subcontracts including the contract/ subcontract number(s), type of contract(s), period of performance (including options), contract/ subcontract value(s) including options, technical program effort(s) (program title), name of GSA Project Manager or Contracting Officer’s Representative (including contact information), name of contracting officer(s) and contact information, and awarding GSA installation; (4) Data on total number and dollar value of subcontracts awarded under GSA prime contracts within the past 2 years and the number and dollar value of such subcontracts awarded to entities ´ ´ who are proposed proteges; (5) Information on the proposed types of developmental assistance. For each ´ ´ proposed mentor-protege relationship include information on the company’s ability to provide developmental ´ ´ assistance to the identified protege firm and how that assistance will potentially increase subcontracting opportunities ´ ´ for the protege firm, including subcontracting opportunities in industry categories where these entities are not dominant in the company’s current subcontractor base; and (6) Agreement information as listed in 519.7010. 519.7010 Agreement contents. The contents of the Agreement must contain: (a) Names, addresses (including facsimile, e-mail, and homepage) and telephone numbers of mentor and ´ ´ protege firms and the name, telephone number, and position title within both PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 41065 firms of the person who will oversee the Agreement. (b) An eligibility statement from the ´ ´ protege stating that it is a small business, its primary NAICS code, and when applicable the type of small business (small disadvantaged business concern, HUBZone small business concern, women-owned small business concern, veteran-owned small business concern, or service-disabled veteranowned small business concern). (c) A description of the type of developmental assistance that will be provided by the mentor firm to the ´ ´ protege firm (see 519.7012). (d) Milestones for providing the identified developmental assistance. ´ ´ (e) Factors to assess the protege firm’s developmental progress under the Program. (f) The anticipated dollar value and type of subcontracts that may be ´ ´ awarded to the protege firm consistent with the extent and nature of mentor firm’s business, and the period of time over which they may be awarded. (g) Program participation term: State the period of time over which the developmental assistance will be performed. (h) Mentor termination procedures: Describe the procedures applicable to the mentor firm when notifying the ´ ´ Protege firm, in writing and at least 30 days in advance, of the mentor firm’s intent to voluntarily withdraw its participation in the Program, or to terminate the Agreement. ´ ´ (i) Protege termination procedures: Describe the procedures applicable to ´ ´ the protege firm when notifying the mentor firm, in writing at least 30 days ´ ´ in advance, of the protege firm’s intent ´ ´ to terminate the Mentor-Protege Agreement. (j) Plan for accomplishing contract ´ ´ work should the Mentor-Protege Agreement be terminated or a party excluded under 519.7014(b). The mentor’s prime contract with GSA ´ ´ continues even if the Mentor-Protege ´ ´ Agreement or the Mentor-Protege Program is discontinued. ´ ´ (k) The protege must agree to provide input into the mentor firm’s semiannual reports (see 519.7015). The ´ ´ protege must submit a ‘‘Lessons Learned’’ evaluation along with the mentor firm at the conclusion of the ´ ´ Mentor-Protege agreement. (l) Other terms and conditions as ´ ´ specified by the Mentor-Protege Manager on a case-by-case basis. 519.7011 Application review. ´ ´ (a) The Mentor-Protege Program Manager will review the information specified in section 519.7009(b) and E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1 41066 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 156 / Friday, August 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 519.7010 to establish the Mentor’s and ´ ´ Protege’s eligibility and to ensure all necessary information is included. If the application relates to a specific contract, ´ ´ then the Mentor-Protege Program Manager will consult with the applicable contracting officer regarding the adequacy of the proposed Agreement, as appropriate. The Mentor´ ´ Protege Program Manager will complete its review no later than 30 days after receipt of the application. The contracting officer must provide feedback to the Program Manager no later than 10 days after receipt of the application. ´ ´ (b) After the Mentor-Protege Program Manager completes its review and provides written approval, the Mentor may execute the Agreement and implement the developmental assistance as provided under the ´ ´ Agreement. The Mentor-Protege Program Manager will provide a copy of ´ ´ the Mentor-Protege Agreement to the GSA contracting officer for any GSA contracts affected by the Agreement. (c) The Agreement defines the relationship between the Mentor and ´ ´ the Protege firms only. The Agreement itself does not create any privity of contract or contractual relationship between the Mentor and GSA nor the ´ ´ Protege and GSA. (d) If the Agreement is disapproved, the Mentor may provide additional information for reconsideration. The ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program Manager will complete the review of any supplemental information no later than 30 days after its receipt. Upon finding deficiencies that GSA considers ´ ´ correctable, the Mentor-Protege Program Manager will notify the Mentor and ´ ´ Protege and request correction of the deficiencies to be provided within 15 days. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 519.7012 Developmental assistance. The forms of developmental assistance a mentor can provide to a ´ ´ protege include: (a) Management guidance relating to— (1) Financial management; (2) Organizational management; (3) Overall business management/ planning; and (4) Business development. (b) Engineering and other technical assistance. (c) Loans. (d) Rent-free use of facilities and/or equipment. (e) Temporary assignment of ´ ´ personnel to the protege for purpose of training. (f) Any other types of developmental assistance approved by the GSA Mentor´ ´ Protege Program Manager. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:09 Aug 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 519.7013 Obligation. ´ ´ (a) The mentor or protege may terminate the Agreement in accordance with 519.7010. The mentor will notify ´ ´ the Mentor-Protege Program Manager and the contracting officer, in writing, at least 30 days in advance of the mentor firm’s intent to voluntarily withdraw from the Program or to terminate the Agreement, or upon receipt of a ´ ´ protege’s notice to withdraw from the Program. ´ ´ (b) Mentor and protege firms will submit a ‘‘Lessons Learned’’ evaluation ´ ´ to the GSA Mentor-Protege Program Manager at the conclusion or ´ ´ termination of each Mentor-Protege Agreement or withdrawal from the ´ ´ Mentor-Protege program. 519.7014 Internal controls. ´ ´ (a) The GSA Mentor-Protege Program Manager will manage the Program. Internal controls will be established by ´ ´ the Mentor-Protege Program Manager to achieve the stated Program objectives (by serving as checks and balances against undesired actions or consequences) such as: (1) Reviewing and evaluating mentor Applications for realism, validity and accuracy of provided information; ´ ´ (2) Monitoring each Mentor-Protege Agreement by reviewing semi-annual progress reports submitted by mentors ´ ´ ´ ´ and proteges on protege development to ´ ´ measure protege progress against the master plan contained in the approved Agreement; (3) Monitoring milestones in the Agreement (see 519.7010); and (4) Evaluating ‘‘Lessons Learned’’ submitted by the Mentor and the ´ ´ Protege as required by section 519.7013 ´ ´ to improve the GSA Mentor-Protege Program. (b)(1) GSA has the authority to ´ ´ exclude mentor or protege firms from participating in the GSA Program. (2) GSA may rescind approval of an ´ ´ existing Mentor-Protege Agreement if it determines that such action is in GSA’s best interest. The rescission shall be in writing and sent to the Mentor and ´ ´ protege after approval by the Director of OSBU. Rescission of an Agreement does not change the terms of any subcontract ´ ´ between the Mentor and the Protege. (3) Exclusion from the Program does not constitute a termination of the subcontract between the mentor and the ´ ´ protege. 519.7015 Reports. (a) Semi-annual reports shall be submitted by the mentor to the GSA ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program manager to include information as outlined in section 552.219–76(c). PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 ´ ´ (b) Proteges must agree to provide input into the mentor firm’s semiannual reports detailing the assistance provided and goals achieved since agreement inception. However, for cost reimbursable contracts, costs associated with the preparation of these reports are unallowable costs under these Government contracts and will not be reimbursed by the Government. (c) The GSA contracting officer, or if applicable the technical program manager, shall include an assessment of the prime contractor’s (mentor’s) ´ ´ performance in the Mentor-Protege Program in a quarterly ‘‘Strengths and Weaknesses’’ evaluation report. A copy of this assessment will be provided to ´ ´ the Mentor-Protege Program Manager ´ ´ and to the mentor and protege. 519.7016 Program review. At the conclusion of each year in the ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program (anniversary ´ ´ date of the Mentor-Protege Program), the ´ ´ prime contractor and protege, as appropriate, will formally brief the GSA ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program Manager, the technical program manager, and the contracting officer regarding Mentor´ ´ Protege Program accomplishments pertaining to the approved Agreement. 519.7017 Contract clauses. (a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 552.219–75, GSA Mentor´ ´ Protege Program, in all unrestricted solicitations (not set aside) and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold that offer subcontracting opportunities or in the case of a small business, that can offer developmental assistance to a small ´ ´ business protege. (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 552.219–76, Mentor Requirements and Evaluation, in contracts anticipated to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold where the prime contractor has signed a ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Agreement with GSA. PART 552—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES 4. Add sections 552.219–75 and 552.219–76 to read as follows: ■ 552.219–75 ´ ´ GSA Mentor-Protege Program. As prescribed in 519.7017(a), insert the following clause: ´ ´ GSA MENTOR-PROTEGE PROGRAM ([SEP 2009]) (a) Prime contractors, including small businesses, are encouraged to participate in ´ ´ the GSA Mentor-Protege Program for the purpose of providing developmental ´ ´ assistance to eligible protege entities to E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 156 / Friday, August 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations enhance their capabilities and increase their participation in GSA contracts. (b) The Program consists of: (1) Mentor firms are large prime contractors with at least one active subcontracting plan, or that are eligible small businesses; ´ ´ (2) Proteges are subcontractors to the prime contractor, and include small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns meeting the qualifications specified in Subpart 519.70; and ´ ´ (3) Mentor-protege Applications and ´ ´ Agreements, approved by the Mentor-Protege Program Manager in the GSA Office of Small Business Utilization (OSBU). (c) Mentor participation in the Program means providing technical, managerial and ´ ´ financial assistance to aid proteges in developing requisite high-tech expertise and business systems to compete for and successfully perform GSA contracts and subcontracts. (d) Contractors interested in participating in the Program are encouraged to read FAR Subpart 19.7 and to contact the GSA Office of Small Business Utilization (E), Washington, DC 20405, (202) 501–1021, for further information. (End of clause) 552.219–76 Mentor Requirements and Evaluation. As prescribed in 519.7017(b), insert the following clause: mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES MENTOR REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION ([SEP 2009]) ´ ´ (a) The purpose of the GSA Mentor-Protege Program is for a GSA prime contractor to provide developmental assistance to certain ´ ´ subcontractors qualifying as proteges. ´ ´ Eligible proteges include small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns meeting the qualifications specified in section 519.7007. The Program requires an Application process and an Agreement between the mentor and the ´ ´ protege. See GSAR Subpart 519.70 for more information. (b) GSA will evaluate a GSA mentor’s performance on the following factors: (1) Specific actions taken by the contractor, during the evaluation period, to increase the ´ ´ participation of its protege as a subcontractor and supplier; (2) Specific actions taken by the contractor during this evaluation period to develop the technical and corporate administrative ´ ´ expertise of its protege as defined in the Agreement; ´ ´ (3) To what extent the protege has met the developmental objectives in the Agreement; and (4) To what extent the firm’s participation ´ ´ in the Mentor-Protege Program resulted in ´ ´ the protege receiving competitive contract(s) VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:09 Aug 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 and subcontract(s) from private firms other than the mentor, and from agencies. (c) Semi-annual reports shall be submitted ´ ´ by a GSA mentor to the GSA Mentor-Protege Program Manager, GSA Office of Small Business Utilization (E), Washington, DC 20405. The reports must include information as outlined in paragraph (b) of this section. The semi-annual report may include a narrative describing the forms of developmental assistance a mentor provides ´ ´ to a protege and any other types of permissible, mutually beneficial assistance. (d) A GSA mentor will notify the GSA ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program Manager and the contracting officer, in writing, at least 30 days in advance of the mentor firm’s intent to voluntarily withdraw from the GSA Program or terminate the Agreement, or upon ´ ´ receipt of a protege’s notice to withdraw from the Program. ´ ´ (e) GSA mentor and protege firms will submit a ‘‘Lessons Learned’’ evaluation to the ´ ´ GSA Mentor-Protege Program Manager at the ´ ´ conclusion of the Mentor-Protege Agreement. ´ ´ At the end of each year in the Mentor-Protege ´ ´ Program, the mentor and protege, as appropriate, will formally brief the GSA ´ ´ Mentor-Protege Program manager, the technical program manager, and the contracting officer during a formal Program review regarding Program accomplishments as they pertain to the approved Agreement. (f) GSA has the authority to exclude ´ ´ mentor or protege firms from participating in the GSA Program. If GSA excludes a mentor ´ ´ or a protege from the Program, the GSA Office of Small Business Utilization will deliver to the contractor a Notice specifying the reason for Program exclusion and the effective date. The exclusion from the Program does not constitute a termination of the subcontract between the mentor and the ´ ´ protege. A plan for accomplishing the subcontract effort should the Agreement be terminated shall be submitted with the Agreement as required in section 519.7011(j). ´ ´ (g) Subcontracts awarded to GSA protege firms under this Program are exempt from competition requirements, notwithstanding FAR 52.244–5. However, price reasonableness should still be determined. (End of clause) [FR Doc. E9–19482 Filed 8–13–09; 8:45 am] 41067 amendment effectuates an adjustment that will enable NHTSA to achieve its mission more effectively and efficiently. DATES: Effective Date: The amendment is effective August 14, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You may contact Jessica Lang, Office of Chief Counsel, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, by phone at 202–366–5263, or by fax at 202–366–3820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends the regulation on delegation of powers and duties within the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The amendment relates solely to the placement of the delegation of authority for a function within the agency. It increases the authority of the Chief Counsel to compromise civil penalties and monetary settlements. There is no substantive effect. Notice and the opportunity for comment are therefore not required under the Administrative Procedure Act. The amendment is effective immediately upon publication in the Federal Register. In addition, the amendment is not subject to Executive Order 12866, the Department of Transportation’s regulatory policies and procedures, or the provisions for Congressional review of final rules in Chapter 8 of Title 5, United States Code. List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 501 Authorities, Delegations, Organization and functions, Succession to Administrator. ■ In consideration of the foregoing, 49 CFR part 501 is amended as follows: PART 501—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 501 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. secs. 105 and 322, delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50. Amendment effective August 14, 2009. BILLING CODE 6820–61–S 2. Section 501.8(d)(2) is revised to read as follows: ■ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Part 501 [Docket No. NHTSA–2009–0146; Notice 1] Delegations of Authority AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This document amends NHTSA’s delegations of authority. The PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 § 501.8 Delegations. * * * * * (d) * * * (2) Establish the legal sufficiency of all investigations and enforcement actions conducted under the authority of the following chapters, including notes, of Title 49 of the United States Code: Chapter 301; chapter 323; chapter 325; chapter 327; chapter 329; and chapter 331; to make an initial penalty demand based on a violations of any of these chapters; and to compromise any civil penalty or monetary settlement in an amount of $100,000 or less resulting E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 156 (Friday, August 14, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41060-41067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 501, 519, and 552

[GSAR Amendment 2009-09; GSAR Case 2006-G501 (Change 37) Docket 2008-
0007; Sequence 6]
RIN 3090-AI56


General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; GSAR Case 
2006-G501, Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program

AGENCIES: General Services Administration (GSA), Office of the Chief 
Acquisition Officer.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is amending the 
General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to amend 
its acquisition regulations to formally encourage GSA prime contractors 
to assist small business, including veteran-owned small business, 
service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone, small 
disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business, in enhancing 
their capabilities to perform contracts and subcontracts for GSA and 
other Federal agencies. The program seeks to increase the base of small 
business eligible to perform GSA contracts and subcontracts. The 
program also seeks to foster long-term business relationships between 
GSA prime contractors and small business entities and to increase the 
overall number of small business entities that receive GSA contracts, 
and subcontract awards.

DATES: Effective Date: September 14, 2009.
    Applicability Date: The final rule applies to solicitations and 
existing contracts for supplies or services, including Federal Supply 
Schedules and construction. Existing contracts shall be modified at no 
cost to the Government by mutual agreement of both parties.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, contact 
Ms. Rhonda Cundiff, Procurement Analyst, at (202) 501-0044. For 
information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the 
Regulatory

[[Page 41061]]

Secretariat (VPR), Room 4041, 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20405, 
(202) 501-4755. Please cite Amendment 2009-09, GSAR case 2006-G501 
(Change 37).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) published a notice 
of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register at 73 FR 32669, June 10, 
2008), in which GSA proposed to develop a Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
Program that encouraged GSA prime contractors to assist small business, 
including small disadvantaged business, veteran-owned, service-disabled 
veteran-owned, HUBZone, and women-owned small business in enhancing 
their capabilities to perform contracts and subcontracts for GSA and 
other Federal agencies. Successful Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
arrangements represent opportunities for creating access for small 
business to GSA contracts and awards. GSA received comments on the 
proposed rule suggesting the Agency clarify the eligible participants 
in the Program and the types of incentives GSA may provide to prime 
contractors for providing developmental assistance to 
prot[eacute]g[eacute]s. After careful consideration of the public 
comments received on the notice of proposed rulemaking, GSA is issuing 
a final rule.
    Resolution of Comments
    Twelve commenters submitted comments in response to the proposed 
rule. Three of the twelve commenters expressed interest in 
participating in the GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program. A 
discussion of the comments and the changes made to the rule as a result 
of those comments is provided below.
    Comment: One commenter recommends that the word ``small'' needs to 
be defined. Large businesses ``hide'' behind small businesses.
    Response: Non-concur. The comment is outside the scope of this GSAR 
case. With the exception of small disadvantaged businesses, 8(a) 
Participants and HUBZone small business concerns, all other firms self-
certify in accordance with the definitions in FAR Part 2.
    Comment: A commenter states that incentives are insufficient and 
suggests monetary reimbursement for mentoring expenses, limited 
ownership interest in the prot[eacute]g[eacute], or relaxation of small 
business affiliation rule.
    Response: Non-concur. GSA does not have legal authority to 
incorporate the incentives suggested by the commenter. GSAM 519.7004, 
Incentive for Prime Contract Participation, is consistent with the 
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Programs of other civilian agencies.
    Comment: Two commenters recommend better monitoring of the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Programs.
    Response: GSA is not responsible for the experiences of other 
Federal agency Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Programs and plans to 
carefully monitor the GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program. GSA 
anticipates having a very successful program that will be beneficial to 
both mentors and prot[eacute]g[eacute]s.
    Comment: Under GSAM 519.7003, General Policy, a commenter 
recommends the need to address how Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
Agreements can be incorporated into small business prime awards and how 
evaluation credit during source selection is given to small business 
firms that are mentors with small business subcontractors.
    Response: Concur. As with other terms and conditions that need 
incorporation into a contract, the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
agreement should be incorporated into the small business prime 
contractor's contract. In addition, there is nothing in the FAR or GSAR 
that precludes establishing source selection criteria that would apply 
to both large and small businesses.
    Comment: One commenter states that GSAR 519.7004, paragraph (b) 
does not appear to belong in this section since it points out that the 
mentor's cost are not reimbursable directly but may be reimbursable 
once indirect cost rates are established with the cognizant audit 
agency. How does this relate to incentives for mentors?
    Response: Non-concur. The civilian agencies do not have the 
statutory authority that the Department of Defense has for its Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program; therefore, civilian agency incentives 
are limited. GSAM 519.7004, Incentive for Prime Contract Participation, 
is consistent with the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Programs of other 
civilian agencies.
    Comment: One commenter requests specific details about the non-
monetary award in GSAM 519.7004(d). In addition, the commenter 
questions why the GSA annual conference in GSAM 519.7004(e) is listed 
as an incentive and states that overall there are no true incentives 
offered for the time and effort the Mentor Program would require.
    Response: Non-concur. GSA will provide the specifics of the non-
monetary award at a later date. The civilian agencies do not have the 
statutory authority that the Department of Defense has; therefore, the 
incentives for civilian agencies are limited. The GSA annual conference 
is an opportunity to network, share Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
experiences and share the ``Lessons Learned''. GSAM 519.7004, Incentive 
for Prime Contract Participation, is consistent with the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Programs of other civilian agencies.
    Comment: A commenter questions indirect costs and states that these 
costs are generally established for cost contracts and certain special 
fixed price contracts. The references for indirect cost rates seem to 
be entirely out of place and would often be inapplicable to many 
competitive firm fixed GSA contracts.
    Response: Non-concur. Even though this paragraph may not apply to 
many GSA contracts, this is a GSA-wide Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
Program that can include contracts that may have indirect costs 
associated with it. The intent of the GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
Program is to not exclude any potential GSA contracts, including GSA 
cost contracts.
    Comment: One commenter refers to FAR 15.101-1 which discusses the 
trade-off process. The commenter states that the natural implication is 
that the evaluation credit is not applicable to lowest-price 
technically acceptable source selection, given that tradeoffs are not 
permitted in that scenario and should be clearly stated, for it 
substantially limits the circumstance under which this incentive could 
be applied. The commenter further states that careful distinction is 
required since the same paragraph goes on to state that past compliance 
with subcontracting plans can be considered as part of past performance 
evaluation (trade-off scenario) but also as part of Responsibility 
Determinations which are made regardless of whether the trade-off or 
LPTA scenario is used so the paragraph is unclear in regard to the 
distinction between the two types of source selection.
    Response: Non-concur. The FAR clearly explains how the trade-off 
process is utilized. The GSAR language at 519.7004(c) states that the 
contracting officer ``may'' give mentors evaluation credit under FAR 
15.101-1 considerations for subcontracts which means that it may not be 
used in all cases.
    Comment: Regarding GSAM 519.7005, one commenter suggests that the 
regulation address how measurement of the program success within the 
first year of the agreement if a Prot[eacute]g[eacute] has not received 
a contract award or dollars. Depending on the terms of the agreement, 
the first year of the program may involve only development or training; 
therefore, contract awards may not be immediate.

[[Page 41062]]

    Response: The GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program will not be 
measured only on the contract award and dollars. The measurement of 
success will include developmental assistance given to the 
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] as required by the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
Program.
    Comment: One commenter requests clarification on GSAM 519.7006 and 
519.7009. GSAM 519.7009 indicates that a large business mentor's 
application must include a statement that the firm is currently 
performing under at least one active approved subcontracting plan. 
However, GSAM 519.7006 states that mentors must either currently be 
operating under an approved subcontracting plan under a negotiated 
award or must have operated under one for a contract awarded within the 
past five years.
    Response: Concur. The language has been revised to state that the 
large business mentor must currently be performing under an approved 
subcontracting plan. The language ``or has performed under at least one 
approved subcontracting plan awarded under a negotiated contract within 
the last five years'' has been deleted.
    Comment: A commenter believes that GSAM 519.7003(c) is vague and 
recommends that the provision be changed to state that an active 
mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] arrangement requires the 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] to already be or become a subcontractor under a 
GSA contract of the mentor firm that contains a subcontracting plan. 
This revision will then be in agreement with GSAM 519.7009(b).
    Response: Concur. The language in GSAM 519.7003(c) has been 
revised.
    Comment: One commenter recommends that the GSAM language be clear 
to indicate that this section includes schedules.
    Response: Concur. Adopted comment.
    Comment: One commenter states that GSAM 519.7004(c) does not 
clearly elaborate on the incentives and the associated specifics. The 
commenter further states that the current language does not mention 
that the mentor can take credit for costs incurred by the mentor. Other 
Federal mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] programs allow the mentor to 
subsequently receive credit towards their subcontracting plan based on 
the amount invested. This section combines mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
performance with small business subcontracting plan compliance which 
are totally separate elements. Commenter recommends adding language 
that explicitly describes the incentive as follows: ``future 
solicitations contain a source selection factor or subfactor regarding 
the participation in the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program. In order 
to receive credit under source selection factor or subfactor, the 
offeror shall provide a signed letter of mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
agreement approval before initial evaluation of proposals. The 
contracting officer may, in his or her discretion, give credit for 
approvals that occur after the initial evaluation of proposals, but 
before final evaluation''. (Currently in DHS and NASA's programs).
    Response: Non-concur. With the exception of instances of allowing 
indirect costs, costs incurred by the mentor are not allowable.
    Comment: A commenter suggests adding language that enables the 
mentor to take credit for the developmental assistance provided and how 
this credit can be applied. Suggested language: ``Mentors are eligible 
to take post-award incentive for subcontracting plan credit whereby the 
mentor will receive credit towards its subcontracting plan for costs it 
incurs to provide assistance to a prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm. The 
mentor may use this additional credit toward achievement of its goal 
under the same or another GSA subcontracting plan. GSA may wish to 
adjust the credit factor as it sees fit, but it is a federal agency 
best practice as represented at DOD, DHS, NASA, and others to 
explicitly state how the benefit and credit is determined.''
    Response: GSA does not concur. GSA believes that the incentives in 
GSAM 519.7004, ``Incentives for prime contractors,'' that includes 
coverage whereby mentors may be reimbursed for their indirect costs are 
sufficient incentives.
    Comment: One commenter recommends removing GSAM 519.7004(c)(2) in 
its entirety.
    Response: Non-concur. The commenter provides no rationale for its 
removal. GSA believes that this subparagraph is an incentive for prime 
contractor participation.
    Comment: A commenter recommends that GSA, if not at inception, then 
at a later date, to provide greater elaboration and detail regarding 
the criteria for the OSBU mentoring award.
    Response: Concur. After implementation of the GSA Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program, the Associate Administrator of the 
Office of Small Business Utilization (OSBU), will be responsible for 
developing the criteria for the OSBU mentoring award.
    Comment: One commenter states that GSAM 519.7009 as currently 
proposed combines elements of a Mentor Application process and a 
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] agreement submittal process. It implies 
that for each prot[eacute]g[eacute] agreement, a mentor submit an 
application. These two elements should be completely separate as 
consistent with other Federal agency practices and procedures. The 
application for the mentor should not contain requests for the number 
of proposed mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] arrangements as cited in GSAM 
519.7009(b)(2) since it is not known how many will be developed in 
outlying years. In addition, the specifics on the type of developmental 
assistance GSAM 519.7009(b)(5) to be provided, or that a signed letter 
of intent by the mentor and prot[eacute]g[eacute] GSAM 519.7009(b)(6) 
be required are not truly indicative of a prime contractor's 
eligibility as a mentor. They are elements germane to the development 
of a specific mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] agreement and should be 
incorporated into the ensuing section. By separating the mentor 
application process from the agreement submittal process, industry and 
Government are given the flexibility in the future to efficiently add a 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] or prot[eacute]g[eacute]s as long as it is in 
good standing both as a prime contractor and mentor. This will result 
in a reduction in the amount of paperwork and time saving for the 
Government.
    Response: Non-concur. Initially, in the proposed rule, GSA had the 
application and the agreement as separate submissions. However, GSA has 
determined that it would be less burdensome on both the contractors and 
GSA personnel to have the application and agreement combined. This is 
consistent with Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Programs of other Federal 
agencies, such as USAID and Department of Homeland Security.
    Comment: One commenter recommends deletion of GSAM 519.7009(b)(2) 
requiring mentors to state the number of proposed prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
arrangements at the time of mentor application review and mentor-
prot[eacute]g[eacute] agreement process.
    Response: Non-concur. GSA is interested in how many 
prot[eacute]g[eacute]s the mentor plans to develop.
    Comment: Delete GSAM 519.7009(b)(6) requiring a letter of intent be 
signed by the prospective mentor and prot[eacute]g[eacute] at the time 
of mentor application submittal. This should be a requirement at the 
time of mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] submittal.
    Response: Concur. The final rule now combines the application and 
agreement. Therefore, the letter of intent is unnecessary.
    Comment: A commenter recommends adding a section in the mentor 
application for prospective mentors to provide information on their 
previous participation in Federal agency mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
programs. Should the prospective mentor not have any prior

[[Page 41063]]

experience, they should describe the entity's ability to provide 
developmental assistance and how that assistance will potentially 
increase subcontracting opportunities for prot[eacute]g[eacute]s. This 
should be inserted under GSAM 519.7009.
    Response: Non-concur. The GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program 
stands independently. GSA will be evaluating the mentor-
prot[eacute]g[eacute] relationship on its own merits. Having experience 
(positive or negative) on other mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] programs 
would not add value and would increase the paperwork burden on the 
contractor.
    Comment: Commenter encourages GSA to review and consider the 
current mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] application process and forms of 
those currently in practice at NASA, DOD or DHS as a baseline.
    Response: GSA has reviewed and considered other agencies' mentor-
prot[eacute]g[eacute] application processes and forms and has chosen 
the most appropriate to suit GSA's needs.
    Comment: Section 519.7017 provides guidance for contracting 
officers to insert this clause. It seems to imply that will be only for 
new contracts with no clear guidance regarding the GSA contracts 
already in place. This will limit the ability for participation by 
industry at the onset, thus limiting the potential short-term impact 
and success. Recommend that GSA give clear guidance or instructions as 
to how existing contracts can be modified to incorporate these new 
clauses in order to facilitate industry participated once initiated.
    Response: Concur. GSA did not intend for current contractors to be 
excluded from participation in the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
Program. GSAM 519.7017 does not need a revision as it states to insert 
the clause in all contracts and is not stating newly awarded contracts. 
The Federal Register Notice indicates that the final rule applies to 
current contracts.
    Comment: Two commenters recommend that GSA amend its rule to 
include language defining non-profit agencies (NPAs) for people who are 
blind or have severe disabilities authorized by the Committee for 
Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely disabled as 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms in Section 519.7007(a).
    Response: Non-concur. The Small Business Administration regulation, 
13 CFR 121.105(a)(1) states: ``Except for small agricultural 
cooperatives, a business concern eligible for assistance from SBA as a 
small business is a business entity organized for profit, with a place 
of business located in the United States, and which operates primarily 
within the United States or which makes a significant contribution to 
the U.S. economy through payment of taxes or use of American products, 
materials or labor.''
    This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject 
to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 
Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major 
rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., applies to 
this final rule. The changes may have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., GSA prepared a Final 
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), and it is summarized as 
follows:

    The GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program will allow small 
businesses to become prot[eacute]g[eacute]s and receive 
developmental assistance from large business mentors. The GSA 
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program also will allow small 
businesses who want to mentor other small businesses to participate 
in the program to provide developmental assistance to 
prot[eacute]g[eacute]s. This Program encourages fostering the 
establishment of long-term business relationships between these 
small business entities and GSA prime contractors. It is expected 
that the Program will increase the overall number of small business 
entities that receive GSA contract and subcontract awards.

    Interested parties may obtain a copy of the FRFA from the 
Regulatory Secretariat. The Regulatory Secretariat will be submitting a 
copy of the FRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small 
Business Administration.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act does apply; however, these changes to 
the FAR do not impose additional information collection requirements to 
the paperwork burden previously approved under OMB Control Number 3090-
0286.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 501, 519, and 552

    Government procurement.

    Dated: August 7, 2009.
Rodney P. Lantier,
Acting Senior Procurement Executive, and Acting Deputy Chief 
Acquisition Officer, Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer, General 
Services Administration.

0
Therefore, GSA amends 48 CFR parts 501, 519, and 552 as set forth 
below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 501, 519, and 552 continues 
to read as follows:

    Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c).

PART 501--GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ACQUISITION REGULATION 
SYSTEM

0
2. Amend section 501.106, in the table, by adding, in numerical 
sequence, GSAR References ``519.70'', ``552.219-75'', ``552.219-76'' 
and their corresponding OMB Control Number ``3090-0286''.

PART 519--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

0
3. Add Subpart 519.70, consisting of sections 519.7001 through 
519.7017, to read as follows:

Subpart 519.70--GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program

Sec.
519.7001 Scope of subpart.
519.7002 Definitions.
519.7003 General policy.
519.7004 Incentives for prime contractors.
519.7005 Measurement of program success.
519.7006 Mentor firms.
519.7007 Prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms.
519.7008 Selection of prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms.
519.7009 Application process.
519.7010 Agreement contents.
519.7011 Application review.
519.7012 Developmental assistance.
519.7013 Obligation.
519.7014 Internal controls.
519.7015 Reports.
519.7016 Program review.
519.7017 Contract clauses.

Subpart 519.70--GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program


519.7001  Scope of subpart.

    The GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program is designed to 
encourage and motivate GSA prime contractors to assist small businesses 
concerns, small disadvantaged businesses concerns, women-owned small 
businesses concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-
disabled veteran-owned small businesses concerns, and HUBZone small 
businesses concerns, and enhance their capability of performing 
successfully on GSA contracts and subcontracts, foster the 
establishment of long-term business relationships between these small 
business entities and GSA prime contractors, and increase the overall 
number of small business entities that receive GSA contract and 
subcontract awards.


519.7002  Definitions.

    The definitions of small business concern, small disadvantaged 
business concern, HUBZone small business concern, women-owned small 
business concern, veteran-owned small business

[[Page 41064]]

concern, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern are 
the same as found in FAR 2.101. Also see 13 CFR 121, 124, 125 and 126.
    (a) Mentor as used in the GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program, 
is a prime contractor that elects, on a specific GSA contract, to 
promote and develop small business subcontractors by providing 
developmental assistance designed to enhance the business success of 
the prot[eacute]g[eacute].
    (b) Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager means an employee 
in the Office of Small Business Utilization (OSBU) (E) designated by 
the Associate Administrator of OSBU to manage the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program.
    (c) Prot[eacute]g[eacute] as used in the GSA Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program is a small business concern that is the 
recipient of developmental assistance pursuant to a mentor-
prot[eacute]g[eacute] arrangement on a specific GSA contract.


519.7003  General policy.

    (a) A large business prime contractor that meets the requirements 
at section 519.7006, and is approved as a mentor firm by the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager, may enter into an Agreement with 
a small business concern, small disadvantaged business concern, women-
owned small business concern, veteran-owned small business concern, 
service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern or HUBZone small 
business concern that meets the requirements for being a 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] (see 519.7007) in order to provide appropriate 
developmental assistance to enhance the capabilities of the 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] to perform successfully as a subcontractor and 
supplier.
    (b) A small business prime contractor that is capable of providing 
developmental assistance to prot[eacute]g[eacute]s, may also be 
approved as a mentor.
    (c) An active mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] arrangement requires the 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] to either be a current or newly selected 
subcontractor under the mentor's prime contract with GSA.
    (d) A small business concern's status as a prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
under a GSA contract shall not have an effect on its ability to seek 
other prime contracts or subcontracts.
    (e) Potential Mentors may submit an application for admittance to 
the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program at any time as long as the 
requirements at section 519.7006 are met.
    (f) The determination of affiliation is a function of the SBA.


519.7004  Incentives for prime contractors.

    (a) Under the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(E), the GSA 
is authorized to provide appropriate incentives to prime contractors in 
order to encourage subcontracting opportunities for small business 
concerns consistent with the efficient and economical performance of 
the contract. This authority is limited to negotiated procurements, 
including the GSA Multiple Award Schedule contracts and the GSA 
Governmentwide Acquisition Contracts. It does not include orders under 
any GSA contracts.
    (b) Costs incurred by a mentor to provide developmental assistance, 
as described in section 519.7012 to fulfill the terms of their 
agreement(s) with a prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm(s), are not reimbursable 
as a direct cost under a GSA contract. If GSA is the mentor's 
responsible audit agency under FAR 42.703-1, GSA will consider these 
costs in determining indirect cost rates. If GSA is not the responsible 
audit agency, mentors are encouraged to enter into an advance agreement 
with their responsible audit agency on the treatment of such costs when 
determining indirect cost rates.
    (c) In addition to paragraph (b) of this section, contracting 
officers may give mentors evaluation credit during the source selection 
process for subcontracts awarded under their subcontracting plans 
pursuant to their Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreements. (See FAR 
15.101-1). Therefore:
    (1) Contracting officers may evaluate proposals with subcontracting 
plans containing Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreements more favorably 
than proposals with subcontracting plans that do not include Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreements; and
    (2) Contracting officers may assess the prime contractor's 
compliance with the subcontracting plans submitted in previous 
contracts as a factor in evaluating past performance under certain 
circumstances (see FAR 15.304(c)(3) and 15.305(a)(2)(v)) and 
determining contractor responsibility FAR section 19.705-5(a)(1).
    (d) OSBU Mentoring Award. A non-monetary award may be presented 
annually to the mentoring firm providing the most effective 
developmental support of a prot[eacute]g[eacute]. The Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager will recommend an award winner to 
the Administrator of GSA.
    (e) OSBU Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Annual Conference. At the 
conclusion of each year in the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program, 
mentor firms will be invited to brief contracting officers, program 
leaders, office directors, and other guests on their experience and 
progress under the Program. Participation is voluntary.


519.7005  Measurement of program success.

    The overall success of the GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program 
encompassing all participating mentors and prot[eacute]g[eacute]s will 
be measured by the extent to which it results in:
    (a) An increase in the number, dollar value, and percentage of 
subcontracts awarded to prot[eacute]g[eacute]s by mentor firms under 
GSA contracts since the date of entry into the Program. The baseline 
that demonstrates an increase is determined by comparing the number and 
total dollar amount of subcontract awards made to the identified 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm(s) during the two preceding fiscal years (if 
any) that are listed in application;
    (b) An increase in the number and dollar value of contract and 
subcontract awards (including percentage of subcontract awards) to 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms since the date of the 
prot[eacute]g[eacute]'s entry into the Program (under GSA contracts and 
contracts awarded by other Federal agencies);
    (c) An increase in the number and dollar value of subcontracts 
awarded to a prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm by its mentor firm; and
    (d) An increase in subcontracting with prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms 
in industry categories where they have not traditionally participated 
within the mentor firm's activity (i.e., the prot[eacute]g[eacute] is 
expanding its field of expertise or is increasing its opportunities in 
areas where it has not traditionally performed).
    (e) Assessments of the semi-annual reports submitted by the mentors 
and ``Lessons Learned'' evaluation submitted by the mentors and 
prot[eacute]g[eacute]s to the GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program 
Manager.


519.7006  Mentor firms.

    (a) Mentors must be:
    (1) A large business prime contractor that is currently performing 
under an approved subcontracting plan as required by FAR 19.7 - Small 
business mentors are exempted; or
    (2) A small business prime contractor that can provide 
developmental assistance to enhance the capabilities of 
prot[eacute]g[eacute]s to perform as contractors, subcontractors, and 
suppliers;
    (b) Must be eligible (not listed in the ``Excluded Parties List 
System'') for U.S. Government contracts and not excluded from the 
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program under section 519.7014(b);
    (c) Must be able to provide developmental assistance that will 
enhance the ability of prot[eacute]g[eacute]s to perform as contractors 
and subcontractors; and

[[Page 41065]]

    (d) Must provide semi-annual reports detailing the assistance 
provided and the cost incurred in supporting prot[eacute]g[eacute]s.


519.7007  Prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms.

    (a) For selection as a prot[eacute]g[eacute], a firm must be:
    (1) A small business concern, small disadvantaged business concern, 
veteran-owned small business concern, service-disabled veteran-owned 
small business concern, HUBZone small business concern, or women-owned 
small business concern;
    (2) Small for the NAICS code the prime contractor/mentor assigns to 
the subcontract; and
    (3) Eligible (not listed in the ``Excluded Parties List System'') 
for U.S. Government contracts and not excluded from the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program under section 519.7014(b).
    (b) A prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm may self-represent to a mentor 
firm that it meets the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this 
section. Mentors may check the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) at 
www.ccr.gov to verify that the self-representation of the potential 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] meets the specified small business and 
socioeconomic category eligibility requirements (see FAR 19.703(b) and 
(d)). HUBZone and small disadvantaged business status eligibility and 
documentation requirements are determined according to 13 CFR Parts 124 
and 126.
    (c) A prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm must not have another formal, 
active mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] relationship under GSA's Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program but may have an active mentor-
prot[eacute]g[eacute] relationship under another agency's program.


519.7008  Selection of prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms.

    (a) Mentor firms will be solely responsible for selecting 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms. Mentors are encouraged to select from a 
broad base of small business concerns including small disadvantaged 
business concerns, women-owned small business concerns, veteran-owned 
small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business 
concerns, and HUBZone small business concerns. A prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
must be either a current subcontractor or a newly selected 
subcontractor for the prime contractor's GSA contract.
    (b) Mentor firms may have more than one prot[eacute]g[eacute]. GSA 
reserves the right to limit the number of prot[eacute]g[eacute]s 
participating under each mentor firm.
    (c) The selection of prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms by mentor firms is 
not protestable, except for a protest regarding the size or eligibility 
status of an entity selected by a mentor to be a prot[eacute]g[eacute]. 
Such protests shall be handled in accordance with FAR 19.703(b). The 
contracting officer shall notify the Office of Small Business 
Utilization (OSBU) of the protest.


519.7009  Application process.

    (a) Prime contractors interested in becoming a mentor firm must 
apply in writing by submitting the GSA Form 3695 to the GSA Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager, at GSA Office of Small Business 
Utilization (E), Washington, DC 20405. The Application shall include 
the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreement and will be evaluated for 
approval based on the extent to which the company plans to provide 
developmental assistance.
    (b) The application must contain:
    (1) A statement that the mentor firm is currently performing under 
at least one active approved subcontracting plan (small business 
exempted) and the firm is eligible, as of the date of Application, for 
the award of Federal contracts;
    (2) The number of proposed prot[eacute]g[eacute] arrangements;
    (3) Data on all current GSA contracts, and subcontracts including 
the contract/subcontract number(s), type of contract(s), period of 
performance (including options), contract/subcontract value(s) 
including options, technical program effort(s) (program title), name of 
GSA Project Manager or Contracting Officer's Representative (including 
contact information), name of contracting officer(s) and contact 
information, and awarding GSA installation;
    (4) Data on total number and dollar value of subcontracts awarded 
under GSA prime contracts within the past 2 years and the number and 
dollar value of such subcontracts awarded to entities who are proposed 
prot[eacute]g[eacute]s;
    (5) Information on the proposed types of developmental assistance. 
For each proposed mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] relationship include 
information on the company's ability to provide developmental 
assistance to the identified prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm and how that 
assistance will potentially increase subcontracting opportunities for 
the prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm, including subcontracting opportunities 
in industry categories where these entities are not dominant in the 
company's current subcontractor base; and
    (6) Agreement information as listed in 519.7010.


519.7010  Agreement contents.

    The contents of the Agreement must contain:
    (a) Names, addresses (including facsimile, e-mail, and homepage) 
and telephone numbers of mentor and prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms and the 
name, telephone number, and position title within both firms of the 
person who will oversee the Agreement.
    (b) An eligibility statement from the prot[eacute]g[eacute] stating 
that it is a small business, its primary NAICS code, and when 
applicable the type of small business (small disadvantaged business 
concern, HUBZone small business concern, women-owned small business 
concern, veteran-owned small business concern, or service-disabled 
veteran-owned small business concern).
    (c) A description of the type of developmental assistance that will 
be provided by the mentor firm to the prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm (see 
519.7012).
    (d) Milestones for providing the identified developmental 
assistance.
    (e) Factors to assess the prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm's 
developmental progress under the Program.
    (f) The anticipated dollar value and type of subcontracts that may 
be awarded to the prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm consistent with the extent 
and nature of mentor firm's business, and the period of time over which 
they may be awarded.
    (g) Program participation term: State the period of time over which 
the developmental assistance will be performed.
    (h) Mentor termination procedures: Describe the procedures 
applicable to the mentor firm when notifying the Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
firm, in writing and at least 30 days in advance, of the mentor firm's 
intent to voluntarily withdraw its participation in the Program, or to 
terminate the Agreement.
    (i) Prot[eacute]g[eacute] termination procedures: Describe the 
procedures applicable to the prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm when notifying 
the mentor firm, in writing at least 30 days in advance, of the 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] firm's intent to terminate the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreement.
    (j) Plan for accomplishing contract work should the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreement be terminated or a party excluded under 
519.7014(b). The mentor's prime contract with GSA continues even if the 
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreement or the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program is discontinued.
    (k) The prot[eacute]g[eacute] must agree to provide input into the 
mentor firm's semi-annual reports (see 519.7015). The 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] must submit a ``Lessons Learned'' evaluation 
along with the mentor firm at the conclusion of the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] agreement.
    (l) Other terms and conditions as specified by the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Manager on a case-by-case basis.


519.7011  Application review.

    (a) The Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager will review 
the information specified in section 519.7009(b) and

[[Page 41066]]

519.7010 to establish the Mentor's and Prot[eacute]g[eacute]'s 
eligibility and to ensure all necessary information is included. If the 
application relates to a specific contract, then the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager will consult with the applicable 
contracting officer regarding the adequacy of the proposed Agreement, 
as appropriate. The Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager will 
complete its review no later than 30 days after receipt of the 
application. The contracting officer must provide feedback to the 
Program Manager no later than 10 days after receipt of the application.
    (b) After the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager 
completes its review and provides written approval, the Mentor may 
execute the Agreement and implement the developmental assistance as 
provided under the Agreement. The Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program 
Manager will provide a copy of the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
Agreement to the GSA contracting officer for any GSA contracts affected 
by the Agreement.
    (c) The Agreement defines the relationship between the Mentor and 
the Prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms only. The Agreement itself does not 
create any privity of contract or contractual relationship between the 
Mentor and GSA nor the Prot[eacute]g[eacute] and GSA.
    (d) If the Agreement is disapproved, the Mentor may provide 
additional information for reconsideration. The Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager will complete the review of any 
supplemental information no later than 30 days after its receipt. Upon 
finding deficiencies that GSA considers correctable, the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager will notify the Mentor and 
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] and request correction of the deficiencies to be 
provided within 15 days.


519.7012  Developmental assistance.

    The forms of developmental assistance a mentor can provide to a 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] include:
    (a) Management guidance relating to--
    (1) Financial management;
    (2) Organizational management;
    (3) Overall business management/planning; and
    (4) Business development.
    (b) Engineering and other technical assistance.
    (c) Loans.
    (d) Rent-free use of facilities and/or equipment.
    (e) Temporary assignment of personnel to the prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
for purpose of training.
    (f) Any other types of developmental assistance approved by the GSA 
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager.


519.7013  Obligation.

    (a) The mentor or prot[eacute]g[eacute] may terminate the Agreement 
in accordance with 519.7010. The mentor will notify the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager and the contracting officer, in 
writing, at least 30 days in advance of the mentor firm's intent to 
voluntarily withdraw from the Program or to terminate the Agreement, or 
upon receipt of a prot[eacute]g[eacute]'s notice to withdraw from the 
Program.
    (b) Mentor and prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms will submit a ``Lessons 
Learned'' evaluation to the GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program 
Manager at the conclusion or termination of each Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreement or withdrawal from the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] program.


519.7014  Internal controls.

    (a) The GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager will 
manage the Program. Internal controls will be established by the 
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager to achieve the stated 
Program objectives (by serving as checks and balances against undesired 
actions or consequences) such as:
    (1) Reviewing and evaluating mentor Applications for realism, 
validity and accuracy of provided information;
    (2) Monitoring each Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreement by 
reviewing semi-annual progress reports submitted by mentors and 
prot[eacute]g[eacute]s on prot[eacute]g[eacute] development to measure 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] progress against the master plan contained in the 
approved Agreement;
    (3) Monitoring milestones in the Agreement (see 519.7010); and
    (4) Evaluating ``Lessons Learned'' submitted by the Mentor and the 
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] as required by section 519.7013 to improve the 
GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program.
    (b)(1) GSA has the authority to exclude mentor or 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms from participating in the GSA Program.
    (2) GSA may rescind approval of an existing Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreement if it determines that such action is in 
GSA's best interest. The rescission shall be in writing and sent to the 
Mentor and prot[eacute]g[eacute] after approval by the Director of 
OSBU. Rescission of an Agreement does not change the terms of any 
subcontract between the Mentor and the Prot[eacute]g[eacute].
    (3) Exclusion from the Program does not constitute a termination of 
the subcontract between the mentor and the prot[eacute]g[eacute].


519.7015  Reports.

    (a) Semi-annual reports shall be submitted by the mentor to the GSA 
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program manager to include information as 
outlined in section 552.219-76(c).
    (b) Prot[eacute]g[eacute]s must agree to provide input into the 
mentor firm's semi-annual reports detailing the assistance provided and 
goals achieved since agreement inception. However, for cost 
reimbursable contracts, costs associated with the preparation of these 
reports are unallowable costs under these Government contracts and will 
not be reimbursed by the Government.
    (c) The GSA contracting officer, or if applicable the technical 
program manager, shall include an assessment of the prime contractor's 
(mentor's) performance in the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program in a 
quarterly ``Strengths and Weaknesses'' evaluation report. A copy of 
this assessment will be provided to the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
Program Manager and to the mentor and prot[eacute]g[eacute].


519.7016  Program review.

    At the conclusion of each year in the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
Program (anniversary date of the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program), 
the prime contractor and prot[eacute]g[eacute], as appropriate, will 
formally brief the GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager, 
the technical program manager, and the contracting officer regarding 
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program accomplishments pertaining to the 
approved Agreement.


519.7017   Contract clauses.

    (a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 552.219-75, 
GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program, in all unrestricted 
solicitations (not set aside) and contracts that exceed the simplified 
acquisition threshold that offer subcontracting opportunities or in the 
case of a small business, that can offer developmental assistance to a 
small business prot[eacute]g[eacute].
    (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 552.219-76, 
Mentor Requirements and Evaluation, in contracts anticipated to exceed 
the simplified acquisition threshold where the prime contractor has 
signed a Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreement with GSA.

PART 552--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
4. Add sections 552.219-75 and 552.219-76 to read as follows:


552.219-75  GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program.

    As prescribed in 519.7017(a), insert the following clause:

    GSA MENTOR-PROT[Eacute]G[Eacute] PROGRAM ([SEP 2009])

    (a) Prime contractors, including small businesses, are 
encouraged to participate in the GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
Program for the purpose of providing developmental assistance to 
eligible prot[eacute]g[eacute] entities to

[[Page 41067]]

enhance their capabilities and increase their participation in GSA 
contracts.
    (b) The Program consists of:
    (1) Mentor firms are large prime contractors with at least one 
active subcontracting plan, or that are eligible small businesses;
    (2) Prot[eacute]g[eacute]s are subcontractors to the prime 
contractor, and include small business concerns, small disadvantaged 
business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-
disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small 
business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns meeting 
the qualifications specified in Subpart 519.70; and
    (3) Mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] Applications and Agreements, 
approved by the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager in the 
GSA Office of Small Business Utilization (OSBU).
    (c) Mentor participation in the Program means providing 
technical, managerial and financial assistance to aid 
prot[eacute]g[eacute]s in developing requisite high-tech expertise 
and business systems to compete for and successfully perform GSA 
contracts and subcontracts.
    (d) Contractors interested in participating in the Program are 
encouraged to read FAR Subpart 19.7 and to contact the GSA Office of 
Small Business Utilization (E), Washington, DC 20405, (202) 501-
1021, for further information.

    (End of clause)


552.219-76  Mentor Requirements and Evaluation.

    As prescribed in 519.7017(b), insert the following clause:

    MENTOR REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION ([SEP 2009])

    (a) The purpose of the GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program 
is for a GSA prime contractor to provide developmental assistance to 
certain subcontractors qualifying as prot[eacute]g[eacute]s. 
Eligible prot[eacute]g[eacute]s include small business concerns, 
small disadvantaged business concerns, veteran-owned small business 
concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, 
HUBZone small business concerns, and women-owned small business 
concerns meeting the qualifications specified in section 519.7007. 
The Program requires an Application process and an Agreement between 
the mentor and the prot[eacute]g[eacute]. See GSAR Subpart 519.70 
for more information.
    (b) GSA will evaluate a GSA mentor's performance on the 
following factors:
    (1) Specific actions taken by the contractor, during the 
evaluation period, to increase the participation of its 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] as a subcontractor and supplier;
    (2) Specific actions taken by the contractor during this 
evaluation period to develop the technical and corporate 
administrative expertise of its prot[eacute]g[eacute] as defined in 
the Agreement;
    (3) To what extent the prot[eacute]g[eacute] has met the 
developmental objectives in the Agreement; and
    (4) To what extent the firm's participation in the Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program resulted in the prot[eacute]g[eacute] 
receiving competitive contract(s) and subcontract(s) from private 
firms other than the mentor, and from agencies.
    (c) Semi-annual reports shall be submitted by a GSA mentor to 
the GSA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager, GSA Office of 
Small Business Utilization (E), Washington, DC 20405. The reports 
must include information as outlined in paragraph (b) of this 
section. The semi-annual report may include a narrative describing 
the forms of developmental assistance a mentor provides to a 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] and any other types of permissible, mutually 
beneficial assistance.
    (d) A GSA mentor will notify the GSA Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager and the contracting officer, 
in writing, at least 30 days in advance of the mentor firm's intent 
to voluntarily withdraw from the GSA Program or terminate the 
Agreement, or upon receipt of a prot[eacute]g[eacute]'s notice to 
withdraw from the Program.
    (e) GSA mentor and prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms will submit a 
``Lessons Learned'' evaluation to the GSA Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Manager at the conclusion of the 
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreement. At the end of each year in 
the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program, the mentor and 
prot[eacute]g[eacute], as appropriate, will formally brief the GSA 
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program manager, the technical program 
manager, and the contracting officer during a formal Program review 
regarding Program accomplishments as they pertain to the approved 
Agreement.
    (f) GSA has the authority to exclude mentor or 
prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms from participating in the GSA Program. 
If GSA excludes a mentor or a prot[eacute]g[eacute] from the 
Program, the GSA Office of Small Business Utilization will deliver 
to the contractor a Notice specifying the reason for Program 
exclusion and the effective date. The exclusion from the Program 
does not constitute a termination of the subcontract between the 
mentor and the prot[eacute]g[eacute]. A plan for accomplishing the 
subcontract effort should the Agreement be terminated shall be 
submitted with the Agreement as required in section 519.7011(j).
    (g) Subcontracts awarded to GSA prot[eacute]g[eacute] firms 
under this Program are exempt from competition requirements, 
notwithstanding FAR 52.244-5. However, price reasonableness should 
still be determined.

    (End of clause)
[FR Doc. E9-19482 Filed 8-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.