Proposed Amendments to the Water Quality Regulations, Water Code and Comprehensive Plan To Revise the Human Health Water Quality Criteria for PCBs in the Delaware Estuary, To Apply the PCB Human Health Water Quality Criterion to Delaware Bay, and To Provide for the Use of Compliance Schedules To Implement Stream Quality Objectives Established by the Commission; Proposed Rulemaking and Public Hearing, 41100-41101 [E9-19028]
Download as PDF
41100
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 156 / Friday, August 14, 2009 / Proposed Rules
DELAWARE RIVER BASIN
COMMISSION
18 CFR Part 410
Proposed Amendments to the Water
Quality Regulations, Water Code and
Comprehensive Plan To Revise the
Human Health Water Quality Criteria
for PCBs in the Delaware Estuary, To
Apply the PCB Human Health Water
Quality Criterion to Delaware Bay, and
To Provide for the Use of Compliance
Schedules To Implement Stream
Quality Objectives Established by the
Commission; Proposed Rulemaking
and Public Hearing
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Delaware River Basin
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of public
hearing.
SUMMARY: The Delaware River Basin
Commission (DRBC or ‘‘Commission’’)
will hold a public hearing to receive
comments on proposed amendments to
the Commission’s Water Quality
Regulations, Water Code and
Comprehensive Plan to revise the
human health water quality criteria for
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the
Delaware Estuary (DRBC Water Quality
Management Zones 2 through 5), extend
application of the DRBC’s PCB human
health water quality criterion to
Delaware Bay (DRBC Water Quality
Zone 6) and provide for the use of
compliance schedules where
implementation of a stream quality
objective established by the Commission
requires a reduction of the pollutant
concentration or loading of a discharge
to Basin waters.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed revised human health water
quality criterion for PCBs and
accompanying implementation plan
will be accepted and must be received
by 5 p.m. on Monday, October 19, 2009.
The public hearing will be held at 1:30
p.m. on Thursday, October 8, 2009. The
hearing will continue until all those
wishing to testify have had an
opportunity to do so. Two informational
meetings will be held in late September,
2009. The informational meeting dates
will be posted on the Commission’s
Web site, https://DRBC.net, on or before
August 17, 2009.
For more information regarding the
procedures for the written comments
and hearing, see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be
held at the Commission’s office building
located at 25 State Police Drive, West
Trenton, NJ. As Internet mapping tools
are inaccurate for this location, please
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:13 Aug 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
use the driving directions posted on the
Commission’s Web site. The locations of
the two informational meetings will be
posted on the Commission’s Web site,
https://DRBC.net, on or before August 17,
2009.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Persons
wishing to testify at the hearing are
asked to register in advance by phoning
Ms. Paula Schmitt at 609–883–9500, ext.
224. Written comments may be
submitted as follows: If by e-mail, to
paula.schmitt@drbc.state.nj.us; if by fax,
to Commission Secretary at 609–883–
9522; if by U.S. Mail, to Commission
Secretary, DRBC, P.O. Box 7360, West
Trenton, NJ 08628–0360; or if by
overnight mail, to Commission
Secretary, DRBC, 25 State Police Drive,
West Trenton, NJ 08628–0360. In all
cases, please include the commenter’s
name, address and affiliation, if any, in
the comment document and ‘‘PCB
Rulemaking’’ in the subject line.
Background. The current DRBC water
quality criteria for PCBs in the Delaware
Estuary were established in 1996. They
pre-date the collection of site-specific
bioaccumulation data for the Delaware
Estuary and Bay and site-specific fishconsumption data for Zones 2 through
4 that are relevant to the development
of human health water quality criteria.
They are also inconsistent with current
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) guidance for the development of
such criteria, and they vary by water
quality zone. One consequence of the
current varied criteria is that in order to
ensure that the current water quality
criterion of 7.9 picograms per liter in the
downstream portion of Zone 5 can be
achieved, the allowable PCB loading to
Zones 2 and 3, where the applicable
criterion currently is 44.4 picograms per
liter, must be even lower than would be
required if the proposed uniform
criterion were in place. DRBC currently
has no PCB water quality criteria for the
Delaware Bay, a shared interstate water
for which the States of New Jersey and
Delaware have established a criterion of
64 picograms per liter.
By Resolution No. 2003–11 on March
19, 2003 the Commission directed its
executive director to initiate rulemaking
on a proposal to revise the
Commission’s human health water
quality criteria, including those for
PCBs, to reflect site-specific data on fish
consumption, site-specific
bioaccumulation factors, and current
EPA guidance on development of
human health criteria. Rulemaking was
delayed, however, pending the
completion of an effort by the
Commission’s Toxics Advisory
Committee (TAC) to revise the criterion
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for PCBs and a separate effort to develop
recommendations for achieving
reductions in PCB loadings to the river
that could be issued in conjunction with
the criterion.
Rigorously applying the most current
available data and methodology,
including site-specific data on fish
consumption, site-specific
bioaccumulation factors, and the current
EPA methodology for the development
of human health criteria for toxic
pollutants (see United States
Environmental Protection Agency,
Methodology for Deriving Ambient
Water Quality Criteria for the Protection
of Human Health (2000), EPA–822–B–
00–004, October 2000), the TAC in July
2005 completed development of a
revised human health water quality
criterion for PCBs for the Delaware
Estuary and Bay of 16 picograms per
liter. Accordingly, by Resolution No.
2005–19 on December 7, 2005, the
Commission directed the executive
director to proceed with rulemaking to
establish the new criterion in DRBC
Water Quality Zones 2 through 6.
Elevated levels of PCBs in the tissues
of fish caught in the Delaware Estuary
and Bay currently prevent the
attainment of the designated uses
‘‘maintenance and propagation of
resident fish and other aquatic life’’
(Zone 2, Zone 5 below River Mile 70
and Zone 6), ‘‘passage of anadromous
fish’’ (Zones 2 through 6), and
‘‘maintenance of resident fish and other
aquatic life’’ (Zones 3, 4 and 5 above
River Mile 70). (See DRBC Water
Quality Regulations (WQR), Art. 3, sec’s
3.30.2 B.2, 3.30.3 B.2, 3.30.4 B.2, 3.30.5
B.2 and 3.30.6 B.2 for Zones 2 through
6, respectively). These uses are
commonly referred to collectively as
‘‘fishable’’ and are deemed to include
human consumption of resident fish.
Accordingly, these waters are listed by
the bordering States as impaired under
Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act
(CWA), which requires that a total
maximum daily load (TMDL) be
established for them. A TMDL expresses
the maximum amount of a pollutant that
a water body can receive and still attain
water quality standards. Once the load
is calculated, it is allocated to all
sources in the watershed—point and
nonpoint—which may not discharge
loads in excess of the share allocated to
them in order to achieve and maintain
the water quality standards. EPA
established TMDLs for PCBs in
December of 2003 for the Delaware
Estuary and in December of 2006 for the
Delaware Bay (‘‘Stage 1 TMDLs’’). It is
anticipated that EPA will establish
revised TMDLs (‘‘Stage 2 TMDLs’’) for
the Delaware Estuary and Bay to attain
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 156 / Friday, August 14, 2009 / Proposed Rules
the revised PCB human health water
quality criterion if approved.
When the Commission directed the
executive director in 2005 to initiate
rulemaking on updated PCB criteria, in
accordance with a recommendation of
the TAC, it also asked her to work with
State regulatory agencies and EPA
(collectively, ‘‘co-regulators’’) to
develop recommendations for
implementing criteria for
bioaccumulative toxic pollutants such
as PCBs that would be ‘‘consistent with
the existing Clean Water Act National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) framework while * * *
reflecting principles of adaptive
management’’ and to solicit public
comment on these recommendations
(DRBC Resolution No. 2005–19 par’s.
3–4). It is expected that Stage 2 TMDLs
issued by EPA will include as an
appendix a TMDL implementation plan
developed by DRBC and its coregulators. The implementation plan,
which will take the form of a guidance
document, will explain how the load
allocations assigned by the TMDL to
nonpoint sources and the wasteload
allocations assigned to point sources
can be achieved consistent with the
Clean Water Act and principles of
adaptive management.
According to the 2003 and 2006
TMDLs, actual loadings of PCBs to the
Delaware Estuary and Bay respectively
are in some cases orders of magnitude
above those needed to allow attainment
of the designated use. The EPA’s 2003
Delaware Estuary TMDL report projects
that ‘‘due to the scope and complexity
of the problem that has been defined
through these TMDLs, achieving the
estuary water quality standards for PCBs
will take decades.’’ (U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Regions II and III,
Total Maximum Daily Loads for
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) for
Zones 2–5 of the Tidal Delaware River,
December 15, 2003, p. xiii). As required
by Section 4.30.9 of the DRBC Water
Quality Regulations, adopted by DRBC
Resolution No. 2005–9 on May 18, 2005,
the largest point source dischargers of
PCBs to the Delaware Estuary and Bay
have already undertaken pollutant
minimization plans designed to locate
the sources of PCBs entering their
wastewater and stormwater systems and
contain or remove them. The TMDL
implementation plan developed by the
co-regulators recognizes that many point
source dischargers already have reduced
their PCB loadings in an effort to meet
their TMDL wasteload allocations
assigned by the Stage 1 TMDLs. Some
point source dischargers are expected to
achieve their required reductions soon;
however, others will require an
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:13 Aug 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
extended period of time, including in
some instances decades, to achieve the
PCB loading reductions needed to meet
their assigned wasteload allocations.
The implementation plan developed by
the co-regulators will accommodate
these dischargers through the use of
compliance schedules consistent with
the Clean Water Act and applicable
regulations. It is understood that those
dischargers who cannot achieve their
wasteload allocations within a single
five-year permit cycle notwithstanding
good faith efforts to do so as soon as
possible will be given additional time,
even if this requires compliance
schedules extending well beyond a
single five-year permit cycle.
Subjects on which Comment is
Expressly Solicited. Public comment is
solicited on all aspects of the proposed
rule. Without limiting the foregoing, the
Commission has identified certain
subject matters on which it expressly
seeks comment. First, comments are
solicited on the assumptions applied in
developing the criterion, including the
appropriate cancer risk level. (See DRBC
Resolution No. 2005–19, par. 2). In
accordance with current DRBC
regulations, that level is 10¥6, or one
additional cancer in every one million
humans exposed for 70 years. (See
WQR, § 3.10.3 D.4). The assumptions
applied in developing the revised PCB
criterion of 16 picograms per liter are set
forth in a basis and background
document that is available on the DRBC
Web site, https://DRBC.net. The second
area on which the Commission
expressly seeks comment is best
approaches for implementing water
quality criteria for bioaccumulative
pollutants consistent with the NPDES
framework and principles of adaptive
management. (See DRBC Resolution No.
2005–19, par. 4). The third is the
implementation plan developed by the
co-regulators, which is posted on the
Commission’s Web site, https://
DRBC.net.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
text of the proposed rule, relevant DRBC
resolutions, the basis and background
document and the co-regulators’
implementation plan for the proposed
criterion will be available on the DRBC
Web site, https://DRBC.net, on or before
August 17, 2009. For further
information, please contact Commission
Secretary Pamela M. Bush, 609–883–
9500 ext. 203.
Dated: August 4, 2009.
Pamela M. Bush,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–19028 Filed 8–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6360–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41101
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 58
[Docket No: EOUST 103]
RIN 1105–AB16
Procedures Governing Administrative
Review of a United States Trustee’s
Decision To Deny a Chapter 12 or
Chapter 13 Standing Trustee’s Claim of
Actual, Necessary Expenses
AGENCY: Executive Office for United
States Trustees (‘‘EOUST’’), Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This notice of proposed
rulemaking (‘‘rule’’) sets forth the
procedures for a chapter 12 or chapter
13 standing trustee (‘‘trustee’’) to obtain
administrative review of a United States
Trustee’s decision to deny a trustee’s
claim that certain expenses are actual
and necessary for the administration of
bankruptcy cases. Section 1231(b) of the
Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and
Consumer Protection Act of 2005
(‘‘BAPCPA’’), codified at 28 U.S.C.
586(e), requires that: Trustees exhaust
all administrative remedies pertaining
to a denial of a claim of actual,
necessary expenses before seeking
judicial review; and the Attorney
General prescribe procedures for
administrative review of such denials.
This rule ensures that the process for
administratively reviewing a United
States Trustee’s denial of a trustee’s
request for expenses is fair and effective.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
October 13, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the rule may
be submitted via https://
www.regulations.gov, by telefax to (202)
307–2397, or by postal mail to EOUST,
20 Massachusetts Ave., NW., 8th Floor,
Washington, DC 20530. To ensure
proper handling of comments, please
reference ‘‘Docket No. EOUST 103—
Trustee Expenses’’ on all written and
electronic correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ramona D. Elliott, General Counsel, or
Larry Wahlquist, Office of General
Counsel, at (202) 307–1399 (not a tollfree number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments
received are considered part of the
public record and made available for
public inspection online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying
information (such as your name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter. If you want to submit
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 156 (Friday, August 14, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41100-41101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19028]
[[Page 41100]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION
18 CFR Part 410
Proposed Amendments to the Water Quality Regulations, Water Code
and Comprehensive Plan To Revise the Human Health Water Quality
Criteria for PCBs in the Delaware Estuary, To Apply the PCB Human
Health Water Quality Criterion to Delaware Bay, and To Provide for the
Use of Compliance Schedules To Implement Stream Quality Objectives
Established by the Commission; Proposed Rulemaking and Public Hearing
AGENCY: Delaware River Basin Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC or ``Commission'')
will hold a public hearing to receive comments on proposed amendments
to the Commission's Water Quality Regulations, Water Code and
Comprehensive Plan to revise the human health water quality criteria
for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the Delaware Estuary (DRBC
Water Quality Management Zones 2 through 5), extend application of the
DRBC's PCB human health water quality criterion to Delaware Bay (DRBC
Water Quality Zone 6) and provide for the use of compliance schedules
where implementation of a stream quality objective established by the
Commission requires a reduction of the pollutant concentration or
loading of a discharge to Basin waters.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed revised human health water
quality criterion for PCBs and accompanying implementation plan will be
accepted and must be received by 5 p.m. on Monday, October 19, 2009.
The public hearing will be held at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, October 8,
2009. The hearing will continue until all those wishing to testify have
had an opportunity to do so. Two informational meetings will be held in
late September, 2009. The informational meeting dates will be posted on
the Commission's Web site, https://DRBC.net, on or before August 17,
2009.
For more information regarding the procedures for the written
comments and hearing, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be held at the Commission's office
building located at 25 State Police Drive, West Trenton, NJ. As
Internet mapping tools are inaccurate for this location, please use the
driving directions posted on the Commission's Web site. The locations
of the two informational meetings will be posted on the Commission's
Web site, https://DRBC.net, on or before August 17, 2009.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Persons wishing to testify at the hearing
are asked to register in advance by phoning Ms. Paula Schmitt at 609-
883-9500, ext. 224. Written comments may be submitted as follows: If by
e-mail, to paula.schmitt@drbc.state.nj.us; if by fax, to Commission
Secretary at 609-883-9522; if by U.S. Mail, to Commission Secretary,
DRBC, P.O. Box 7360, West Trenton, NJ 08628-0360; or if by overnight
mail, to Commission Secretary, DRBC, 25 State Police Drive, West
Trenton, NJ 08628-0360. In all cases, please include the commenter's
name, address and affiliation, if any, in the comment document and
``PCB Rulemaking'' in the subject line.
Background. The current DRBC water quality criteria for PCBs in the
Delaware Estuary were established in 1996. They pre-date the collection
of site-specific bioaccumulation data for the Delaware Estuary and Bay
and site-specific fish-consumption data for Zones 2 through 4 that are
relevant to the development of human health water quality criteria.
They are also inconsistent with current U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) guidance for the development of such criteria, and they
vary by water quality zone. One consequence of the current varied
criteria is that in order to ensure that the current water quality
criterion of 7.9 picograms per liter in the downstream portion of Zone
5 can be achieved, the allowable PCB loading to Zones 2 and 3, where
the applicable criterion currently is 44.4 picograms per liter, must be
even lower than would be required if the proposed uniform criterion
were in place. DRBC currently has no PCB water quality criteria for the
Delaware Bay, a shared interstate water for which the States of New
Jersey and Delaware have established a criterion of 64 picograms per
liter.
By Resolution No. 2003-11 on March 19, 2003 the Commission directed
its executive director to initiate rulemaking on a proposal to revise
the Commission's human health water quality criteria, including those
for PCBs, to reflect site-specific data on fish consumption, site-
specific bioaccumulation factors, and current EPA guidance on
development of human health criteria. Rulemaking was delayed, however,
pending the completion of an effort by the Commission's Toxics Advisory
Committee (TAC) to revise the criterion for PCBs and a separate effort
to develop recommendations for achieving reductions in PCB loadings to
the river that could be issued in conjunction with the criterion.
Rigorously applying the most current available data and
methodology, including site-specific data on fish consumption, site-
specific bioaccumulation factors, and the current EPA methodology for
the development of human health criteria for toxic pollutants (see
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Methodology for Deriving
Ambient Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health
(2000), EPA-822-B-00-004, October 2000), the TAC in July 2005 completed
development of a revised human health water quality criterion for PCBs
for the Delaware Estuary and Bay of 16 picograms per liter.
Accordingly, by Resolution No. 2005-19 on December 7, 2005, the
Commission directed the executive director to proceed with rulemaking
to establish the new criterion in DRBC Water Quality Zones 2 through 6.
Elevated levels of PCBs in the tissues of fish caught in the
Delaware Estuary and Bay currently prevent the attainment of the
designated uses ``maintenance and propagation of resident fish and
other aquatic life'' (Zone 2, Zone 5 below River Mile 70 and Zone 6),
``passage of anadromous fish'' (Zones 2 through 6), and ``maintenance
of resident fish and other aquatic life'' (Zones 3, 4 and 5 above River
Mile 70). (See DRBC Water Quality Regulations (WQR), Art. 3, sec's
3.30.2 B.2, 3.30.3 B.2, 3.30.4 B.2, 3.30.5 B.2 and 3.30.6 B.2 for Zones
2 through 6, respectively). These uses are commonly referred to
collectively as ``fishable'' and are deemed to include human
consumption of resident fish. Accordingly, these waters are listed by
the bordering States as impaired under Section 303(d) of the Clean
Water Act (CWA), which requires that a total maximum daily load (TMDL)
be established for them. A TMDL expresses the maximum amount of a
pollutant that a water body can receive and still attain water quality
standards. Once the load is calculated, it is allocated to all sources
in the watershed--point and nonpoint--which may not discharge loads in
excess of the share allocated to them in order to achieve and maintain
the water quality standards. EPA established TMDLs for PCBs in December
of 2003 for the Delaware Estuary and in December of 2006 for the
Delaware Bay (``Stage 1 TMDLs''). It is anticipated that EPA will
establish revised TMDLs (``Stage 2 TMDLs'') for the Delaware Estuary
and Bay to attain
[[Page 41101]]
the revised PCB human health water quality criterion if approved.
When the Commission directed the executive director in 2005 to
initiate rulemaking on updated PCB criteria, in accordance with a
recommendation of the TAC, it also asked her to work with State
regulatory agencies and EPA (collectively, ``co-regulators'') to
develop recommendations for implementing criteria for bioaccumulative
toxic pollutants such as PCBs that would be ``consistent with the
existing Clean Water Act National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) framework while * * * reflecting principles of adaptive
management'' and to solicit public comment on these recommendations
(DRBC Resolution No. 2005-19 par's. 3-4). It is expected that Stage 2
TMDLs issued by EPA will include as an appendix a TMDL implementation
plan developed by DRBC and its co-regulators. The implementation plan,
which will take the form of a guidance document, will explain how the
load allocations assigned by the TMDL to nonpoint sources and the
wasteload allocations assigned to point sources can be achieved
consistent with the Clean Water Act and principles of adaptive
management.
According to the 2003 and 2006 TMDLs, actual loadings of PCBs to
the Delaware Estuary and Bay respectively are in some cases orders of
magnitude above those needed to allow attainment of the designated use.
The EPA's 2003 Delaware Estuary TMDL report projects that ``due to the
scope and complexity of the problem that has been defined through these
TMDLs, achieving the estuary water quality standards for PCBs will take
decades.'' (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regions II and III,
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) for
Zones 2-5 of the Tidal Delaware River, December 15, 2003, p. xiii). As
required by Section 4.30.9 of the DRBC Water Quality Regulations,
adopted by DRBC Resolution No. 2005-9 on May 18, 2005, the largest
point source dischargers of PCBs to the Delaware Estuary and Bay have
already undertaken pollutant minimization plans designed to locate the
sources of PCBs entering their wastewater and stormwater systems and
contain or remove them. The TMDL implementation plan developed by the
co-regulators recognizes that many point source dischargers already
have reduced their PCB loadings in an effort to meet their TMDL
wasteload allocations assigned by the Stage 1 TMDLs. Some point source
dischargers are expected to achieve their required reductions soon;
however, others will require an extended period of time, including in
some instances decades, to achieve the PCB loading reductions needed to
meet their assigned wasteload allocations. The implementation plan
developed by the co-regulators will accommodate these dischargers
through the use of compliance schedules consistent with the Clean Water
Act and applicable regulations. It is understood that those dischargers
who cannot achieve their wasteload allocations within a single five-
year permit cycle notwithstanding good faith efforts to do so as soon
as possible will be given additional time, even if this requires
compliance schedules extending well beyond a single five-year permit
cycle.
Subjects on which Comment is Expressly Solicited. Public comment is
solicited on all aspects of the proposed rule. Without limiting the
foregoing, the Commission has identified certain subject matters on
which it expressly seeks comment. First, comments are solicited on the
assumptions applied in developing the criterion, including the
appropriate cancer risk level. (See DRBC Resolution No. 2005-19, par.
2). In accordance with current DRBC regulations, that level is
10-6, or one additional cancer in every one million humans
exposed for 70 years. (See WQR, Sec. 3.10.3 D.4). The assumptions
applied in developing the revised PCB criterion of 16 picograms per
liter are set forth in a basis and background document that is
available on the DRBC Web site, https://DRBC.net. The second area on
which the Commission expressly seeks comment is best approaches for
implementing water quality criteria for bioaccumulative pollutants
consistent with the NPDES framework and principles of adaptive
management. (See DRBC Resolution No. 2005-19, par. 4). The third is the
implementation plan developed by the co-regulators, which is posted on
the Commission's Web site, https://DRBC.net.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The text of the proposed rule,
relevant DRBC resolutions, the basis and background document and the
co-regulators' implementation plan for the proposed criterion will be
available on the DRBC Web site, https://DRBC.net, on or before August
17, 2009. For further information, please contact Commission Secretary
Pamela M. Bush, 609-883-9500 ext. 203.
Dated: August 4, 2009.
Pamela M. Bush,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19028 Filed 8-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6360-01-P