Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance, Availability, 40629-40630 [E9-19295]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 12, 2009 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
STEM degree completion, and career
choices. Research and demonstration
projects also investigate effective
practices for transitioning students with
disabilities across critical academic
junctures, retaining students in
undergraduate and graduate STEM
degree programs, and graduating
students with STEM associate,
baccalaureate and graduate degrees.
Research, demonstration, and
enrichment project results inform the
delivery of innovative, transformative
and successful practices employed by
the Alliances for Students with
Disabilities in STEM to increase the
number of students with disabilities
completing associate, undergraduate
and graduate degrees in STEM and to
increase the number of students with
disabilities entering our nation’s science
and engineering workforce. RDE
projects contribute to closing the gaps
occurring for people with disabilities in
STEM fields by successfully
disseminating findings, project
evaluation results, and proven good
practices and products to the public.
The original information collection,
approved by OMB in 1996, surveyed
three groups of students: students with
disabilities in STEM fields, student with
disabilities in other fields, and students
without disabilities in STEM fields.
These data allowed NSFD to understand
more fully the population of students
with disabilities in STEM fields and the
issues they faced. The collection that
will be submitted for reinstatement
focuses more specifically on the
outcomes of the RDE program, and how
alliances and researchers receiving NSF
RDE funding have improved the
academic environment for students with
disabilities. This information collection
will consist of an on-line data
instrument that RDE awardees will use
to submit annual data on their project
activities and participants, as well as
future evaluation activities.
Use of the Information
This information is required for
effective administration,
communication, program and project
monitoring and evaluation, and for
measuring attainment of NSF’s program,
project and strategic goals, as required
by the President’s Management agenda
as represented by the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Program Assessment Rating Tool
(PART) and the NSF’s Strategic Plan.
The Foundation’s FY 2006–2011
Strategic Plan describes four strategic
outcome goals of Discovery, Learning,
Research Infrastructure, and
Stewardship. NSF’s complete strategic
plan may be found at: https://
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:38 Aug 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
www.nsf.gov/publications/
pubsumm.jsp?ods_key=nsf0648.
Data collected will be used for
accountability purposes, including
responding from queries from
Committees of Visitors and other
scientific experts, and for separate
research and evaluation studies.
Estimate of Burden
Respondents: Principal Investigators
and/or project staff receiving NSF RDE
awards.
Number of Respondents: 45.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 1220 hours.
Frequency of Responses: Data will be
collected from awardees annually, and
on an as-needed basis for future
evaluation work.
Dated: August 7, 2009.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. E9–19343 Filed 8–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
40629
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the
NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR),
located at One White Flint North, Public
File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike
(first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Publicly available records will be
accessible electronically from the
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site, https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209, or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail
to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day
of August 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jon H. Thompson,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch 2–
1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E9–19296 Filed 8–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0074; Docket No. 50–414]
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of
Withdrawal of Application for
Amendment to Facility Operating
License
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission) has
granted the request of Duke Energy
Carolinas, LLC (the licensee) to
withdraw its November 20, 2008,
application, as supplemented by letter
dated February 26, 2009, for proposed
amendment to Facility Operating
License No. 50–414 for Catawba Nuclear
Station, Unit 2 (Catawba 2), located in
York County, South Carolina.
The proposed amendment would
have updated the leak-before-break
evaluation for Catawba 2 and made
associated updates to the Updated Final
Safety Analysis Report for this unit.
The Commission had previously
issued a Notice of Consideration of
Issuance of Amendment published in
the Federal Register on February 24,
2009 (74 FR 8273). However, by letter
dated March 31, 2009, the licensee
withdrew the proposed change.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for
amendment dated November 20, 2008,
the supplement to the amendment dated
February 26, 2009, and the licensee’s
letter dated March 31, 2009, which
withdrew the application for license
amendment. Documents may be
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0351]
Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance,
Availability
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Issuance and
Availability of Draft Regulatory Guide,
DG–1236, ‘‘Initial Startup Test Program
to Demonstrate Remote Shutdown
Capability for Water-Cooled Nuclear
Power Plants.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan Ortega-Luciano, U. S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone: (301) 415–
1159 or e-mail Jonathan.OrtegaLuciano@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing for public
comment a draft guide in the agency’s
‘‘Regulatory Guide’’ series. This series
was developed to describe and make
available to the public such information
as methods that are acceptable to the
NRC staff for implementing specific
parts of the NRC’s regulations,
techniques that the staff uses in
evaluating specific problems or
postulated accidents, and data that the
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
40630
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 12, 2009 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
staff needs in its review of applications
for permits and licenses.
The draft regulatory guide (DG),
entitled, ‘‘Initial Startup Test Program to
Demonstrate Remote Shutdown
Capability for Water-Cooled Nuclear
Power Plants,’’ is temporarily identified
by its task number, DG–1236, which
should be mentioned in all related
correspondence. DG–1236 is proposed
Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.68.2,
dated July 1978.
This guide describes an initial startup
test program acceptable to the NRC staff
for demonstrating hot shutdown
capability and the potential for cold
shutdown from outside the control
room. This guide is applicable to watercooled nuclear power plants.
Title 10, Part 50, of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 50),
‘‘Domestic Licensing of Production and
Utilization Facilities,’’ and 10 CFR Part
52, ‘‘Licenses, Certifications, and
Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants,’’
10 CFR 50.34, ‘‘Contents of
Applications; Technical Information,’’
and 10 CFR 52.79, ‘‘Contents of
Application, Technical Information in
FSAR,’’ require, in part, that an
applicant for a license to operate a
production or utilization facility
provide a safety analysis report (SAR)
that includes the principal design
criteria for the proposed facility. The
introduction to Appendix A, ‘‘General
Design Criteria for Nuclear Power
Plants,’’ to 10 CFR Part 50 states that
these principal design criteria are to
establish the necessary design,
fabrication, construction, testing, and
performance requirements for
structures, systems, and components
(SSCs) important to safety (i.e., SSCs
that provide reasonable assurance that
the facility can be operated without
undue risk to the health and safety of
the public).
II. Further Information
The NRC staff is soliciting comments
on DG–1236. Comments may be
accompanied by relevant information or
supporting data and should mention
DG–1236 in the subject line. Comments
submitted in writing or in electronic
form will be made available to the
public in their entirety through the
NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access
and Management System (ADAMS).
Because your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or
contact information, the NRC cautions
you against including any information
in your submission that you do not want
to be publicly disclosed.
The NRC requests that any party
soliciting or aggregating comments
received from other persons for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:38 Aug 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
submission to the NRC inform those
persons that the NRC will not edit their
comments to remove any identifying or
contact information, and therefore, they
should not include any information in
their comments that they do not want
publicly disclosed. You may submit
comments by any of the following
methods:
1. Mail comments to: Rulemaking and
Directives Branch, Mail Stop: TWB–05–
B01M, Division of Administrative
Services, Office of Administration, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
2. Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for documents filed under Docket ID
[NRC–2009–0351]. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
301–492–3668; e-mail
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
3. Fax comments to: Rulemaking and
Directives Branch, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission at (301) 492–3446.
Requests for technical information
about DG–1236 may be directed to the
NRC contact, Jonathan Ortega-Luciano
at (301) 251–7627 or e-mail to
Jonathan.Ortega-Luciano@nrc.gov.
Comments would be most helpful if
received by October 9, 2009. Comments
received after that date will be
considered if it is practical to do so, but
the NRC is able to ensure consideration
only for comments received on or before
this date. Although a time limit is given,
comments and suggestions in
connection with items for inclusion in
guides currently being developed or
improvements in all published guides
are encouraged at any time.
Electronic copies of DG–1236 are
available through the NRC’s public Web
site under Draft Regulatory Guides in
the ‘‘Regulatory Guides’’ collection of
the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/. Electronic copies are also
available in ADAMS (https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html),
under Accession No. ML091210435.
In addition, regulatory guides are
available for inspection at the NRC’s
Public Document Room (PDR) located at
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland. The PDR’s mailing address is
USNRC PDR, Washington, DC 20555–
0001. The PDR can also be reached by
telephone at (301) 415–4737 or (800)
397–4205, by fax at (301) 415–3548, and
by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Regulatory guides are not
copyrighted, and Commission approval
is not required to reproduce them.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 4th day
of August, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John N. Ridgely,
Acting Chief, Regulatory Guide Development
Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of
Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. E9–19295 Filed 8–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL
REVIEW BOARD
Notice of Meeting
Board meeting: September 23, 2009–
National Harbor, MD; the U.S. Nuclear
Waste Technical Review Board will
meet to discuss the implications of fuelcycle technologies for nuclear waste
management and disposal.
Pursuant to its authority under
section 5051 of Public Law 100–203,
Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act
of 1987, the U.S. Nuclear Waste
Technical Review Board will meet at
National Harbor, Maryland, on
Wednesday, September 23, 2009, to
discuss the implications of alternative
technological strategies for the
management and disposal of spent
nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive
waste. The Board will receive an update
on the Fuel Cycle Study being
conducted at the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, and a panel of industry
representatives will discuss their
proposals to the U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) for recycling,
reprocessing, and burning spent nuclear
fuel in fast reactors. The Board also has
invited a representative of the Nuclear
Energy Agency to present an overview
of efforts in other countries to manage
and dispose of nuclear waste.
Information presented at the meeting
will be used by the Board as part of its
ongoing effort to inform Congress, the
Secretary of Energy, and a blue-ribbon
commission of technical issues and
questions that should be addressed
related to waste-management
alternatives. The Nuclear Waste Policy
Amendments Act of 1987 requires the
Board to conduct an independent
review of the technical and scientific
validity of DOE activities related to
nuclear waste management, including
transporting, packaging, and disposing
of spent nuclear fuel and high-level
radioactive waste.
The Board meeting will be held at the
Gaylord Hotel; 201 Waterfront Street;
National Harbor, MD 20745; (tel.) 301–
965–2000, (fax) 301–965–2039.
A detailed meeting agenda will be
available on the Board’s Web site, http:
//www.nwtrb.gov, approximately one
week before the meeting. The agenda
also may be obtained by telephone
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40629-40630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19295]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2009-0351]
Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance, Availability
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Issuance and Availability of Draft Regulatory Guide,
DG-1236, ``Initial Startup Test Program to Demonstrate Remote Shutdown
Capability for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants.''
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Ortega-Luciano, U. S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: (301) 415-
1159 or e-mail Jonathan.Ortega-Luciano@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public
comment a draft guide in the agency's ``Regulatory Guide'' series. This
series was developed to describe and make available to the public such
information as methods that are acceptable to the NRC staff for
implementing specific parts of the NRC's regulations, techniques that
the staff uses in evaluating specific problems or postulated accidents,
and data that the
[[Page 40630]]
staff needs in its review of applications for permits and licenses.
The draft regulatory guide (DG), entitled, ``Initial Startup Test
Program to Demonstrate Remote Shutdown Capability for Water-Cooled
Nuclear Power Plants,'' is temporarily identified by its task number,
DG-1236, which should be mentioned in all related correspondence. DG-
1236 is proposed Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.68.2, dated July
1978.
This guide describes an initial startup test program acceptable to
the NRC staff for demonstrating hot shutdown capability and the
potential for cold shutdown from outside the control room. This guide
is applicable to water-cooled nuclear power plants.
Title 10, Part 50, of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part
50), ``Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,''
and 10 CFR Part 52, ``Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for
Nuclear Power Plants,'' 10 CFR 50.34, ``Contents of Applications;
Technical Information,'' and 10 CFR 52.79, ``Contents of Application,
Technical Information in FSAR,'' require, in part, that an applicant
for a license to operate a production or utilization facility provide a
safety analysis report (SAR) that includes the principal design
criteria for the proposed facility. The introduction to Appendix A,
``General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants,'' to 10 CFR Part 50
states that these principal design criteria are to establish the
necessary design, fabrication, construction, testing, and performance
requirements for structures, systems, and components (SSCs) important
to safety (i.e., SSCs that provide reasonable assurance that the
facility can be operated without undue risk to the health and safety of
the public).
II. Further Information
The NRC staff is soliciting comments on DG-1236. Comments may be
accompanied by relevant information or supporting data and should
mention DG-1236 in the subject line. Comments submitted in writing or
in electronic form will be made available to the public in their
entirety through the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS).
Because your comments will not be edited to remove any identifying
or contact information, the NRC cautions you against including any
information in your submission that you do not want to be publicly
disclosed.
The NRC requests that any party soliciting or aggregating comments
received from other persons for submission to the NRC inform those
persons that the NRC will not edit their comments to remove any
identifying or contact information, and therefore, they should not
include any information in their comments that they do not want
publicly disclosed. You may submit comments by any of the following
methods:
1. Mail comments to: Rulemaking and Directives Branch, Mail Stop:
TWB-05-B01M, Division of Administrative Services, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001.
2. Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and search for documents filed under Docket ID [NRC-2009-0351]. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher, 301-492-3668; e-mail
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
3. Fax comments to: Rulemaking and Directives Branch, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at (301) 492-3446.
Requests for technical information about DG-1236 may be directed to
the NRC contact, Jonathan Ortega-Luciano at (301) 251-7627 or e-mail to
Jonathan.Ortega-Luciano@nrc.gov.
Comments would be most helpful if received by October 9, 2009.
Comments received after that date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the NRC is able to ensure consideration only for comments
received on or before this date. Although a time limit is given,
comments and suggestions in connection with items for inclusion in
guides currently being developed or improvements in all published
guides are encouraged at any time.
Electronic copies of DG-1236 are available through the NRC's public
Web site under Draft Regulatory Guides in the ``Regulatory Guides''
collection of the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/. Electronic copies are also available in
ADAMS (https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html), under Accession No.
ML091210435.
In addition, regulatory guides are available for inspection at the
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) located at 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland. The PDR's mailing address is USNRC PDR,
Washington, DC 20555-0001. The PDR can also be reached by telephone at
(301) 415-4737 or (800) 397-4205, by fax at (301) 415-3548, and by e-
mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Regulatory guides are not copyrighted, and Commission approval is
not required to reproduce them.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 4th day of August, 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John N. Ridgely,
Acting Chief, Regulatory Guide Development Branch, Division of
Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. E9-19295 Filed 8-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P