Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 40639-40640 [E9-19276]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 12, 2009 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
program may request different data in
some of the data fields on the form, the
use of the Standard Form 424 will be
mandatory. FMCSA must adopt the
Standard Form—Project Progress Report
(SF–PPR) as its preferred form for
quarterly reporting. Therefore, the SF–
PRR would be mandatory for quarterly
reporting. However, individual grant
programs may require additional SF–
PRR attachments. Additional guidance
will be provided to grant recipients
upon award.
Fourth, FMCSA is increasing the use
of electronic documents. As a result, the
number of original copies of grant
agreements required to be signed by
Grantees and submitted to FMCSA is
now two. In addition, FMCSA will
provide most grant agreement
documents electronically to its financial
processing office. Grantees are,
however, still required to submit the
Automated Clearing House (ACH)
Vendor Payment Form (SF–3881)
directly to FMCSA’s financial
processing office by U.S. Postal Service,
courier service or secure fax.
Application Information for FY 2010
Grants
General information about FMCSA
grant programs is available in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
which can be found on the internet at
https://www.cfda.gov. To apply for
funding, applicants must register with
grants.gov at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/get–registered.jsp and submit
an application in accordance with
instructions provided for each grant
program.
If funds remain available within each
grant program, applications filed after
the deadline will be considered.
Evaluation Factors: The following
evaluation factors will be used in
reviewing the applications for all
FMCSA discretionary grants:
(1) Prior performance—Completion of
identified programs and goals per the
project plan.
(2) Effective Use of Prior Grants—
Demonstrated timely use and expensing
of available funds.
(3) Cost Effectiveness—Applications
will be evaluated and prioritized on the
expected safety impact relative to the
investment of grant funds. Where
appropriate, costs per unit will be
calculated and compared with national
averages to determine effectiveness. In
other areas, proposed costs will be
compared with historical information to
confirm reasonableness.
(4) Applicability to announced
priorities—If national priorities are
included in the grants.gov notice, those
proposals that specifically address these
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:38 Aug 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
issues will be given priority
consideration.
(5) Ability of the applicant to support
the strategies and activities in the
proposal for the entire project period of
performance.
(6) Use of innovative approaches in
executing a project plan to address
identified safety issues.
(7) Feasibility of overall program
coordination and implementation based
upon the project plan.
(8) Grant specific evaluation factors as
described in the grants.gov application
information.
Issued on: August 6, 2009.
William A. Quade,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement and
Program Delivery.
David Anewalt,
Acting Associate Administrator for Research
and Information Technology.
[FR Doc. E9–19285 Filed 8–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To
Release Airport Property at the SeattleTacoma International Airport, Seattle,
WA
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of request to release
airport property.
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and
invite public comment on the release of
land at the Seattle-Tacoma International
Airport under the provisions of section
125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Investment Reform Act for the 21st
Century (AIR 21).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 6, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this
application may be mailed or delivered
to the FAA at the following address: Ms.
Carol Suomi, Manager, Federal Aviation
Administration, Northwest Mountain
Region, Airports Division, Seattle
Airports District Office, 1601 Lind Ave.,
SW., Suite 250, Renton, Washington
98057.
In addition, one copy of any
comments submitted to the FAA must
be mailed or delivered to Mr. Allan
Royal, Manager, Port of Seattle Real
Estate Development, P.O. Box 68727,
Seattle, Washington, 98168.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Roman Pinon, Project Manager, Federal
Aviation Administration, Northwest
Mountain Region, Airports Division,
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40639
Seattle Airports District Office, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Suite 250, Renton,
Washington 98057.
The request to release property may
be reviewed in person at this same
location.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
invites public comment on the request
to release property at the SeattleTacoma International Airport under the
provisions of the AIR 21.
On June 17, 2009, the FAA
determined that the request to release
property at the Seattle Tacoma
International Airport submitted by the
Port of Seattle, Washington met the
procedural requirements of the Federal
Aviation Regulations, part 155. The
FAA may approve the request, in whole
or in part, no later than August 6, 2009.
The following is a brief overview of
the request:
The Seattle-Tacoma International
Airport requests the release of 495,653
square feet of non-aeronautical airport
property to Port of Seattle, Washington.
The current property is vacant and has
no ability to have an aviation use
associated with the land. The purpose of
this release is to allow the Port to sell
the subject land that no longer serves
any aeronautical purpose at the airport
to the City of Des Moines, WA for use
as a jail site.
Any person may inspect the request
by appointment at the FAA office listed
above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
In addition, any person may, inspect
the application, notice and other
documents germane to the application
in person at the Seattle-Tacoma
International Airport, 17801
International Blvd., Seattle, Washington,
98188.
Issued in Renton, Washington on July 6,
2009.
Carol Suomi,
Manager, Seattle Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. E9–19055 Filed 8–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
with certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
40640
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 12, 2009 / Notices
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favor of relief.
City of Crystal Lake, Illinois
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA–2009–
0013]
The City of Crystal Lake, Illinois
(City) seeks a permanent waiver of
compliance from a certain provision of
the Use of Locomotive Horns at
Highway-Rail Grade Crossings, Title 49
CFR part 222. The City is seeking a
waiver from the rule that requires active
grade crossing warning devices at public
crossings within a quiet zone be
equipped with constant warning time
devices. Specifically, the City is seeking
a waiver from the provisions of 49 CFR
222.35(b)(1), so that the active grade
crossing warning devices at Prairie
Street are not required to be equipped
with constant warning time devices.
49 CFR 222.35(b)(1) reads as follows:
‘‘Each public highway-rail grade
crossing in a New Quiet Zone
established under this part must be
equipped, no later than the quiet zone
implementation date, with active grade
crossing warning devices comprising
both flashing lights and gates which
control traffic over the crossing and that
conform to the standards contained in
the MUTCD. Such warning devices shall
be equipped with constant warning time
devices, if reasonably practical, and
power-out indicators.’’ The purpose of
constant warning time devices (CWT) is
so that the crossing warning devices
provide the same amount of warning
time regardless of the speed of the
approaching train.
The City is in the process of
establishing a new quiet zone along the
Union Pacific Railroad’s (UP) McHenry
Subdivision, which would extend from
approximately Milepost (MP) 58.21 to
MP 59.35. The quiet zone will consist of
two public at-grade crossings, one of
which is at IL Route 176 (DOT # 178
803B) and the other is at Prairie Street
(DOT #178 802 U).
Prairie Street is a two lane, 40 foot
wide, asphalt road with an average daily
traffic of 1,450 and a posted speed limit
of 30 miles per hour (mph). The
crossing has two railroad tracks, one of
which is the main track and the other
is an industrial track. There are nine
train movements per day (six on the
main track and three on the industrial
track) with a maximum timetable speed
of 20 mph. The automatic warning
devices at the crossing are standard
flashing lights with gates. CWT is
present for detecting trains on the main
track and DC circuits are used on the
industrial track.
The lack of CWT on the industrial
track was first raised at a diagnostic
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:38 Aug 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
review meeting on February 22, 2008.
Since that date, the City has attempted
to resolve the question as to whether or
not CWT was ‘‘reasonably practical’’ as
used in the rule with the Railroad, FRA
and the Illinois Commerce Commission
(ICC) without success. An FRA
representative indicated that it usually
leaves the determination of this up to
the State agency responsible for crossing
safety, which is ICC in this case and the
railroad. Neither party in this instance
is willing to make a determination.
The City cites the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices Section 8D.06
which states that CWT shall be used
where the speed of trains on a given
track vary considerably under normal
operation. The City also refers to the
Illinois Department of Transportation
Bureau of Local Road’s manual chapter
40–2.04, which provides in part that
CWT should be considered where trains
operate at variable speeds on the line.
The City’s position is that CWT is not
reasonably practical for a number of
reasons. There are relatively few trains
through the crossing and they travel at
a low constant speed. Prairie Street is a
low volume street which has not had a
crossing collision within the last 5
years. The City is working on removing
the on-the-street bike route in the future
which will enhance safety. It also states
that a quiet zone can be established
without making any improvements at
Prairie Street and notes that UP did not
raise the issue of the crossing not having
CWT during the 60 day comment period
on the Notice of Intent to establish a
quiet zone. Lastly, the City points out
that the money necessary to install CWT
would be taking away funds that could
be used to improve the City’s roadways
which are in need of improvements.
The City states that it attempted to
reach an agreement with UP in regard to
their requirement for CWT through
numerous correspondence; however, no
resolution was attained. Due to the
unresolved issue, the City is not filing
a joint waiver. It is the opinion of the
City that the absence of a joint waiver
that included UP would not
significantly contribute to public safety
as is described in its petition.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2009–
0013) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.—5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
Issued in Washington, DC on August 6,
2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–19276 Filed 8–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
with certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40639-40640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19276]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being
[[Page 40640]]
requested, and the petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.
City of Crystal Lake, Illinois
[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-2009-0013]
The City of Crystal Lake, Illinois (City) seeks a permanent waiver
of compliance from a certain provision of the Use of Locomotive Horns
at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings, Title 49 CFR part 222. The City is
seeking a waiver from the rule that requires active grade crossing
warning devices at public crossings within a quiet zone be equipped
with constant warning time devices. Specifically, the City is seeking a
waiver from the provisions of 49 CFR 222.35(b)(1), so that the active
grade crossing warning devices at Prairie Street are not required to be
equipped with constant warning time devices.
49 CFR 222.35(b)(1) reads as follows: ``Each public highway-rail
grade crossing in a New Quiet Zone established under this part must be
equipped, no later than the quiet zone implementation date, with active
grade crossing warning devices comprising both flashing lights and
gates which control traffic over the crossing and that conform to the
standards contained in the MUTCD. Such warning devices shall be
equipped with constant warning time devices, if reasonably practical,
and power-out indicators.'' The purpose of constant warning time
devices (CWT) is so that the crossing warning devices provide the same
amount of warning time regardless of the speed of the approaching
train.
The City is in the process of establishing a new quiet zone along
the Union Pacific Railroad's (UP) McHenry Subdivision, which would
extend from approximately Milepost (MP) 58.21 to MP 59.35. The quiet
zone will consist of two public at-grade crossings, one of which is at
IL Route 176 (DOT 178 803B) and the other is at Prairie
Street (DOT 178 802 U).
Prairie Street is a two lane, 40 foot wide, asphalt road with an
average daily traffic of 1,450 and a posted speed limit of 30 miles per
hour (mph). The crossing has two railroad tracks, one of which is the
main track and the other is an industrial track. There are nine train
movements per day (six on the main track and three on the industrial
track) with a maximum timetable speed of 20 mph. The automatic warning
devices at the crossing are standard flashing lights with gates. CWT is
present for detecting trains on the main track and DC circuits are used
on the industrial track.
The lack of CWT on the industrial track was first raised at a
diagnostic review meeting on February 22, 2008. Since that date, the
City has attempted to resolve the question as to whether or not CWT was
``reasonably practical'' as used in the rule with the Railroad, FRA and
the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) without success. An FRA
representative indicated that it usually leaves the determination of
this up to the State agency responsible for crossing safety, which is
ICC in this case and the railroad. Neither party in this instance is
willing to make a determination.
The City cites the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
Section 8D.06 which states that CWT shall be used where the speed of
trains on a given track vary considerably under normal operation. The
City also refers to the Illinois Department of Transportation Bureau of
Local Road's manual chapter 40-2.04, which provides in part that CWT
should be considered where trains operate at variable speeds on the
line.
The City's position is that CWT is not reasonably practical for a
number of reasons. There are relatively few trains through the crossing
and they travel at a low constant speed. Prairie Street is a low volume
street which has not had a crossing collision within the last 5 years.
The City is working on removing the on-the-street bike route in the
future which will enhance safety. It also states that a quiet zone can
be established without making any improvements at Prairie Street and
notes that UP did not raise the issue of the crossing not having CWT
during the 60 day comment period on the Notice of Intent to establish a
quiet zone. Lastly, the City points out that the money necessary to
install CWT would be taking away funds that could be used to improve
the City's roadways which are in need of improvements.
The City states that it attempted to reach an agreement with UP in
regard to their requirement for CWT through numerous correspondence;
however, no resolution was attained. Due to the unresolved issue, the
City is not filing a joint waiver. It is the opinion of the City that
the absence of a joint waiver that included UP would not significantly
contribute to public safety as is described in its petition.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2009-0013) and may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.--5 p.m.) at the above
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages
19477-78).
Issued in Washington, DC on August 6, 2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E9-19276 Filed 8-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P