Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Single Nuclear Unit at the Bellefonte Site, 40000-40003 [E9-19045]
Download as PDF
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
40000
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices
thence leaving the existing centerline,
South 84 degrees 53 minutes 12 seconds
East 65.00 feet to a point 65.00 feet right
of station 32+50.00, said point being on
the grantor’s western property line and
the existing Right-of-Way of and the
proposed Limited Access Right-of-Way
of S.R. 741 and the western line of an
existing channel easement owned by the
State of Ohio, conveyed by M.F.# 78–
638 E02, in the Montgomery County
Recorder’s Office;
thence leaving the existing Right-of-Way
and the proposed Limited Access Rightof-Way and crossing the existing
channel easement owned by the State of
Ohio, South 84 degrees 53 minutes 12
seconds East 15.00 feet to a point
located 80.00 feet right of station
32+50.00, said point being on the
eastern line of an existing channel
easement owned by the State of Ohio
and the true point of beginning of the
following described parcel:
thence along the existing channel
easement owned by the State of Ohio,
North 34 degrees 33 minutes 31 seconds
East 30.51 feet to an iron pin to be set
95.00 feet right of station 32+76.57, said
point being the intersection of the
existing channel easement owned by the
State of Ohio and the proposed channel
easement;
thence leaving the existing channel
easement owned by the State of Ohio
and along the proposed channel
easement, South 05 degrees 06 minutes
48 seconds West 136.57 feet to an iron
pin to be set 95.00 feet right of station
31+40.00;
thence continuing along the proposed
channel easement, North 84 degrees 53
minutes 12 seconds West 15.07 feet to
an iron pin to be set 79.93 feet right of
station 31+40.00, said point being the
intersection of the proposed channel
easement and the eastern line of an
existing channel easement owned by the
State of Ohio;
thence along the eastern line of an
existing channel easement owned by the
State of Ohio, North 05 degrees 08
minutes 51 seconds East 110.00 feet to
the point of beginning.
The above described area is located
within Montgomery County Auditor’s
Permanent Parcel Numbers K45 02602
0010 and K45 02602 0015. The parcel
contains 0.042 acres, more or less, of
which 0.038 acres is contained within
K45 02602 0010, and 0.004 acres is
contained within K45 02602 0015.
Parcel 126 CH–2
Situated in the State of Ohio, in the
County of Montgomery, in the
Township of Miami, in section 10,
Town 2, Range 5 M.R.S. and being a part
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:09 Aug 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
of a tract of land currently owned by
The City of Dayton as currently
described in the reference instrument
M.F. #74–023 D06.
Being a parcel of land lying on the
right side of the centerline of existing
S.R. 741 of Project MOT–75–0.75, made
by the Ohio Department of
Transportation in Book 207, Page 12A,
B, & C, of the records of Montgomery
County, and being located within the
following described points in the
boundary thereof:
Beginning for reference at the
proposed centerline monument located
at the intersection of the MiamisburgSpringboro Pike (C.R. 166), station
178+80.09 and S.R. 741, station
39+56.49, said point having the
following project adjusted coordinates:
North 586268.7404; East 1481449.0814;
thence along the existing centerline of
S.R. 741, South 05 degrees 06 minutes
48 seconds West 158.41 feet to a point
located at station 37+98.08;
thence leaving the existing centerline,
South 84 degrees 53 minutes 12 seconds
East 60.00 feet to an iron pin to be set
60.00 feet right of station 37+98.08, said
point being the intersection of the
grantor’s western property line and the
existing Limited Access Right-of-Way of
S.R. 741 and proposed Limited Access
Right-of-Way of Miamisburg-Springboro
Pike (C.R. 166) and the western line of
an existing channel easement owned by
the State of Ohio, conveyed by M.F.#
78–638 E02, in the Montgomery County
Recorder’s Office;
thence along the proposed Limited
Access Right-of-Way, North 74 degrees
08 minutes 39 seconds East 5.35 feet to
an iron pin to be set 65.00 feet right of
station 38+00.00, said point being the
intersection of the eastern line of an
existing channel easement owned by the
State of Ohio and the proposed Limited
Access Right-of-Way and the true point
of beginning of the following described
parcel:
thence along proposed Limited Access
Right-of-Way, North 74 degrees 08
minutes 39 seconds East 68.01 feet to an
iron pin to be set 128.51 feet right of
station 38+24.34;
thence continuing along proposed
Limited Access Right-of-Way, South 88
degrees 30 minutes 19 seconds East
12.30 feet to an iron pin to be set 140.79
feet right of station 38+25.12, said point
being the intersection of the proposed
Limited Access Right-of-Way and the
proposed channel easement;
thence leaving the proposed Limited
Access Right-of-Way and along the
proposed channel easement, South 05
degrees 06 minutes 48 seconds West
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
467.44 feet to an iron pin to be set
140.79 feet right of station 33+57.68;
thence continuing along the proposed
channel easement, South 34 degrees 33
minutes 31 seconds West 52.46 feet to
an iron pin to be set 115.00 feet right of
station 33+12.00, said point being the
intersection of the proposed channel
easement and the western line of an
existing channel easement owned by the
State of Ohio;
thence along the existing channel
easement owned by the State of Ohio,
North 44 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds
West 58.90 feet to point located 70.00
feet right of station 33+50.00;
thence continuing along the existing
channel easement owned by the State of
Ohio, North 04 degrees 28 minutes 36
seconds East 450.03 feet to the point of
beginning.
The above described area is located
within Montgomery County Auditor’s
Permanent Parcel Number K45 02602
0015. The parcel contains 0.810 acres,
more or less.
Issued in Romulus, Michigan on July 17,
2009.
Matthew J. Thys,
Manager, Detroit Airports District Office,
FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. E9–19030 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement for a Single Nuclear Unit at
the Bellefonte Site
Tennessee Valley Authority.
Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice of intent (NOI) is
provided in accordance with the
Council on Environmental Quality’s
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508)
and Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA)
procedures for implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). TVA will prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS) to update information
in the 1974 Final Environmental
Statement for Bellefonte Nuclear Plant
Units 1 and 2 (1974 FES) and other
pertinent environmental reviews, in
order to address the potential
environmental impacts associated with
its proposal to operate a single nuclear
generation unit at the Bellefonte Nuclear
Plant (BLN) site located in Jackson
County, Alabama. Currently, there are
two partially constructed units at the
BLN site. TVA may choose to complete
and operate either one of these partially
constructed units or construct and
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices
operate one new technology unit.
Operation of one nuclear unit capable of
producing approximately 1,100
megawatts (MW) of power would help
address the need for additional base
load generation in the TVA power
service area; meet TVA’s goal to have at
least 50 percent of its generation
portfolio comprised of low or zero
carbon-emitting sources by the year
2020; and make beneficial use of
existing assets at the BLN site.
DATES: Comments on the draft SEIS will
be invited from the public. It is
anticipated that the draft SEIS will be
available in fall 2009. A notice of
availability of a draft SEIS will be
published in the Federal Register, as
well as announced in the local news
media.
Information about the SEIS
may be obtained by contacting Ruth M.
Horton, Senior NEPA Specialist,
Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 West
Summit Hill Drive, Mail Stop WT 11D,
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902; by emailing to blnp@tva.gov; or by visiting
the project Web site at https://
www.tva.gov/blnp.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about nuclear plant
construction and operation, contact
Andrea Sterdis, Nuclear Generation
Development and Construction,
Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101
Market Street, Mail Stop LP 5A,
Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 (e-mail:
alsterdis@tva.gov).
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
TVA Power System
TVA is an agency and instrumentality
of the United States, established by an
act of Congress in 1933, to foster the
social and economic welfare of the
people of the Tennessee Valley region
and to promote the proper use and
conservation of the region’s natural
resources. One component of this
mission is the generation, transmission,
and sale of reliable and affordable
electric energy. TVA operates the
nation’s largest public power system,
producing 4 percent of all electricity in
the nation. TVA provides electricity to
most of Tennessee and parts of Virginia,
North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama,
Mississippi, and Kentucky. It serves
about 9 million people in this sevenstate region through 158 power
distributors and 58 directly served large
industries and federal facilities. The
TVA Act requires the TVA power
system to be self-supporting and
operated on a nonprofit basis, and the
TVA Act directs TVA to sell power at
rates as low as are feasible.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:09 Aug 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
Dependable capacity on the TVA
power system is about 37,000 MW. TVA
generates most of this power with three
nuclear plants, 11 coal-fired plants, nine
combustion-turbine plants, a combinedcycle plant, 29 hydroelectric dams, a
pumped-storage facility, a wind farm, a
methane-gas cofiring facility, and
several small renewable generating
facilities. A portion of delivered power
is obtained through long-term power
purchase agreements. About 60 percent
of TVA’s annual generation is from
fossil fuels, predominantly coal; 30
percent is from nuclear; and the
remainder is from hydro and other
renewable energy resources. TVA
transmits electricity from these facilities
over almost 16,000 miles of
transmission lines. Like other utility
systems, TVA has power interchange
agreements with utilities surrounding
the Tennessee Valley region and
purchases and sells power on an
economic basis almost daily.
In the mid-1990s, TVA developed an
Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) with
extensive public involvement. This
process was completed with publication
of the Energy Vision 2020 Integrated
Resource Plan and Final Environmental
Impact Statement (IRP/FEIS) in 1995
and the associated record of decision
(ROD) in 1996. Based on the extensive
evaluation, TVA decided to adopt a
flexible portfolio of supply- and
demand-side energy resource options to
meet the growing demand for electricity
in the region and achieve the goals of
the TVA Act and other congressional
directives. The portfolio of alternatives
analyzed in the IRP/FEIS encompassed
the current proposal to complete one
nuclear unit at the BLN site. On June 15,
2009, TVA announced its intent to
conduct a new comprehensive study
and environmental impact statement
(EIS) entitled the Integrated Resource
Plan. The proposal set out in this NOI
also supports TVA’s goal of reducing its
carbon footprint by 2020 and the need
to make beneficial use of the existing
infrastructure at the BLN site.
Bellefonte Nuclear Plant
The BLN site is located in northeast
Alabama on 1,600 acres adjacent to the
Tennessee River at Mile 392, near the
cities of Hollywood and Scottsboro in
Jackson County. The site includes two
partially completed Babcock and Wilcox
(B&W) pressurized water reactors
known as BLN Units 1 and 2 (BLN 1&2),
with a capacity of about 1,200 MW each.
The then Atomic Energy Commission
(now called the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission or NRC) issued
construction permits for BLN 1&2 on
December 24, 1974. When TVA halted
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40001
construction activities in 1988, in
response to decreased power demand,
BLN 1 was approximately 90 percent
compete, and BLN 2 was approximately
58 percent complete.
TVA maintained the plant in deferred
status until November 2005, when
TVA’s Board of Directors approved the
cancellation of BLN 1&2 in order to
facilitate consideration of the BLN site
for other possible uses. TVA submitted
a Site Redress Plan to the NRC, along
with a request for withdrawal of the
construction permits. Under the redress
plan, TVA maintained environmental
permits and equipment associated with
ongoing activities at BLN, including a
training center and a substation. The
construction permits were withdrawn
by the NRC in September 2006.
Subsequent asset recovery activities,
along with more recent inspections of
remaining equipment, resulted in BLN
1&2 now being considered
approximately 55 percent and 35
percent complete, respectively.
In 2006, TVA joined NuStart Energy
Development LLC (NuStart), a
consortium of 10 utility companies and
two reactor vendors, to demonstrate the
feasibility of processing a combined
construction and operating license
application (COLA) under 10 CFR Part
52 and to complete the design
engineering for the Westinghouse
AP1000 advanced design for a
pressurized water reactor. Preliminary
designs for two new reactors at BLN,
known as Units 3 and 4 (BLN 3&4), were
developed as part of the application
process. In choosing the BLN 3&4
proposal as a COLA candidate, NuStart
recognized that a substantial portion of
the existing BLN 1&2 equipment and
ancillary structures (e.g., cooling towers,
intake structure, transmission
switchyards) could be used to support
such a new facility and that their use
could reduce the cost of new
construction. The COLA for BLN 3&4
was submitted to the NRC in October
2007 with TVA as the applicant of
record. The COLA described the siting
of two AP1000 reactors with an
estimated thermal reactor power level of
3,400 MW and a net electrical output of
at least 1,100 MW from each reactor.
Although TVA is the applicant of record
for the NuStart demonstration, TVA has
not decided to construct these advanced
reactors at the BLN site.
In August 2008, in response to
changes in power generation economics
since 2005 and the possible effects of
constraints on the availability of the
worldwide supply of components
needed for new generation
development, TVA requested
reinstatement of the construction
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
40002
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
permits for BLN 1&2. Reinstatement
would allow TVA to return the units to
deferred status; resume preservation and
maintenance activities; and determine
whether the completion of construction
and operation of the units would be a
viable option. The NRC reinstated
TVA’s construction permits for BLN 1&2
in terminated plant status in March
2009. TVA is currently working to
return the plant to deferred plant status.
In addition to this current SEIS, TVA is
conducting a Detailed Scoping,
Estimating, and Planning (DSEP) study
to further explore the feasibility of
completing BLN 1 or BLN 2.
In April 2009, NuStart transferred the
initial licensing efforts and reference
plant designation for the AP1000 from
BLN 3&4 to Southern Nuclear’s Plant
Vogtle. The transfer of the reference
designation will help the NRC complete
the reference plant licensing process
sooner and help move the industry
closer to new plant construction and
commercial operation of the AP1000
technology. Notwithstanding the
transfer of the reference plant
designation to Plant Vogtle, TVA is
continuing to pursue a combined
operating license for BLN 3&4 to
preserve future base load generation
options.
Proposed Action and Alternatives
To address the need for additional
low or zero carbon-emitting base load
generation in the 2017 to 2020 time
frame, TVA proposes to supplement the
1974 FES and other pertinent
environmental reviews discussed in
related documents identified below. The
SEIS will evaluate the Action
Alternatives of (1) completing and
operating one partially completed B&W
unit and (2) constructing and operating
one new Westinghouse AP1000 unit.
For either of these two Action
Alternatives, use of the BLN site offers
TVA the opportunity to maximize the
value of existing assets, minimize
environmental disturbance from new
plant construction, and utilize licensing
processes that are already underway.
TVA will also consider the No Action
Alternative.
Under both Action Alternatives, the
existing 161-kilovolt (kV) and 500-kV
switchyards constructed on the BLN site
would be refurbished and reenergized;
four 500-kV transmission lines that
terminate in the BLN switchyard would
be reestablished; the right-of-way would
be brought back to current TVA
standards; the capacity of nine existing
transmission lines would be increased;
and two 161-kV transmission lines that
supply a 161-kV switchyard to provide
site power would be reestablished. TVA
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:09 Aug 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
owns and operates the regional
transmission system.
No decision to build any new
generating capacity at the BLN site has
been made at this time. TVA is
preparing this SEIS to supplement the
original 1974 FES and update the
information in related documents
discussed below in order to inform
decision makers and the public about
the potential for environmental impacts
associated with a decision to complete
(or construct) and operate one unit at
the BLN site. The draft SEIS will be
made available for public comment. In
making its final decision, the TVA
Board will consider the assessment in
this SEIS, including input provided by
reviewing agencies and the public, as
well as the information in the DSEP
study and the cost and engineering
studies for the AP1000.
Summary of Relevant Environmental
Reviews
Several evaluations in the form of
environmental reviews, studies, and
white papers have been prepared for
actions related to the construction and
operation of a nuclear plant or
alternative power generation source at
the BLN site. As provided in the
regulations (40 CFR Part 1502) for
implementing NEPA, this SEIS will
update, tier from, and incorporate by
reference information contained in these
documents about the BLN site and about
nuclear plant construction and
operation.
The environmental consequences of
constructing and operating BLN 1&2
were addressed comprehensively in the
1974 FES. In 1993, TVA issued a white
paper in support of TVA’s 120-day
notice to NRC for resumption of plant
construction. The white paper reviewed
10 aspects of TVA’s proposal in the
1974 FES that had changed or were
likely to change. TVA subsequently
chose not to resume construction.
Environmental conditions at the BLN
site have been comprehensively
reviewed three more times since 1993.
The 1997 FEIS for the Bellefonte
Conversion Project considered
construction and operation of five types
of fossil fuel generation, four of which
involved plants with total electricity
production capacity equivalent to BLN
1&2 (approximately 2,400 MW). The
proposed combustion turbine plant was
not constructed.
TVA participated as a cooperating
agency with the Department of Energy
(DOE) in preparing an EIS evaluating
the production of tritium at one or more
commercial light water reactors to
ensure safe and reliable tritium supply
for U.S. defense needs. The FEIS for the
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Production of Tritium in a Commercial
Light Water Reactor addressed the
completion and operation of BLN 1&2
and updated the environmental record
with regard to their operation. TVA
adopted this FEIS in May 2000. DOE did
not select BLN for tritium production,
and TVA’s current proposal to complete
additional generating capacity at BLN
does not involve the production of
tritium. The tritium production FEIS
included pertinent information on spent
nuclear fuel management, health and
safety, decommissioning, as well as
other topics.
Most recently in 2007, as a part of the
COLA for BLN 3&4, TVA, as a member
of the NuStart consortium, prepared and
submitted a comprehensive
environmental report (ER) entitled
Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Units 3&4, COL
Application, Part 3, Environmental
Report (COLA ER), for the construction
and operation of two Westinghouse
AP1000 nuclear plants at the BLN site.
In addition to updating the description
of environmental conditions at BLN and
some operational aspects related to the
cooling water system, this report fully
describes the environmental effects of
constructing and operating BLN 3&4. It
also contains a discussion of alternative
sites and energy resource options.
In addition to documents directly
related to the BLN site, two other TVA
documents are relevant to this SEIS.
First is the above-mentioned 1995 IRP/
FEIS. Deferral and completion of BLN
1&2 were among the suite of alternatives
evaluated in the IRP/FEIS, but not as
part of the preferred alternative. This
was because in the IRP’s economic
analyses, TVA made conservative
assumptions about the capacity factor
(roughly how much a unit would be
able to run) achieved by nuclear units.
TVA’s nuclear units, consistent with
U.S. nuclear industry performance, now
routinely exceed this earlier assumed
capacity factor, which will be taken into
account in the current consideration of
completing or constructing a single
nuclear unit at the BLN site.
In February 2004, TVA issued the
Reservoir Operations Study
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement evaluating the potential
environmental impacts of alternative
ways for operating the agency’s
reservoir system to produce overall
greater public value for the people of the
Tennessee Valley. This FEIS evaluated,
among other things, the adequacy of the
water supply necessary for reliable,
efficient operation of TVA generating
facilities within the operating limits of
their National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System permits and other
permits. A ROD for this FEIS was issued
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices
in May 2004. TVA will incorporate
assumptions for reservoir operations
resulting from this FEIS review in the
present evaluation.
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Need for Power
The proposal under consideration by
TVA is to meet the demand for
additional base load capacity on the
TVA system and maximize the use of
existing assets by either completing one
of the unfinished B&W units or by
constructing one new AP1000 unit. The
environmental impacts of other energy
resource options were evaluated as part
of TVA’s IRP/FEIS and in the COLA ER.
This proposal also helps achieve TVA’s
goal to have at least 50 percent of its
generation portfolio comprised of low or
zero carbon-emitting sources by 2020.
Demand for energy in the TVA power
service area is expected to grow at an
average rate of approximately 1.1
percent per year over the next 20 years.
In addition, TVA continues to set new
peaks for power demand on its system,
including a new all-time winter peak.
TVA’s current plan to meet growing
demand includes a diversified
expansion portfolio of market purchases
(including up to 2,000 MW of renewable
energy through a public request for
proposal), intermediate and peaking gasfired capacity, continued modernization
of TVA’s hydro plants to increase their
power producing capacity, and
expansion of TVA’s Generation Partners
Program. Combined with these actions,
TVA anticipates having to add new base
load capacity to its system no later than
the 2017–2020 time frame. As part of
this SEIS, TVA will update the Need for
Power analysis, as well as consider any
new environmental information.
Preliminary Identification of
Environmental Issues
This SEIS will update the analyses of
potential environmental, cultural,
recreational, and socioeconomic
impacts resulting from completion (or
construction), operation, and
maintenance of one nuclear unit and of
reenergizing and upgrading the existing
transmission system. The impact
analyses will include, but not
necessarily be limited to, the potential
impacts on water quality and use;
vegetation; wildlife; aquatic ecology;
endangered and threatened species;
floodplains; wetlands; land use;
recreational and managed areas; visual,
archaeological, and historic resources;
noise; socioeconomics; solid and
hazardous waste; geology and
seismology; meteorology, air quality,
and climate change; uranium fuels cycle
effects and radiological impacts; nuclear
plant safety and security including
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:09 Aug 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
design basis accidents; and severe
accidents and intentional destructive
acts. Information from TVA’s and NRC’s
previous environmental reviews
(described above) relevant to the current
assessment will be incorporated by
reference and summarized in the SEIS.
Public and Agency Participation
This SEIS is being prepared to update
information and to inform decision
makers and the public about the
potential environmental impacts of
completing and operating a single
nuclear unit at the BLN site. The SEIS
process also will provide the public an
opportunity to comment on TVA’s
analyses. Other federal, state, and local
agencies and governmental entities will
be asked to comment, including the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, the Alabama
Department of Environmental
Management, and Alabama Department
of Conservation and Natural Resources.
TVA will invite the review agencies
and the public to submit written, verbal,
e-mail, or online comments on the draft
SEIS. It is anticipated that the draft SEIS
will be released in fall 2009. Notice of
availability of the draft SEIS will be
published in the Federal Register, as
well as announced in local news media.
TVA expects to release a final SEIS in
early spring 2010.
Dated: August 4, 2009.
Anda A. Ray,
Senior Vice President & Environmental
Executive, Office of Environment and
Research, Tennessee Valley Authority.
[FR Doc. E9–19045 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120–08–P
40003
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before September 9, 2009
to be assured of consideration.
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau (TTB)
OMB Number: 1513–XXXX.
Type of Review: New Information
Collection Activity.
Title: Certificate of Taxpaid Alcohol.
Description: TTB F 5100.4
consolidates taxes paid on distilled
spirits used in the manufacture of
nonbeverage products for exportation.
The form is completed by TTB industry
members to receive back $1 for each
proof gallon of nonbeverage products
exported. The form is certified by TTB
as proof that the taxes have been paid
and not previously received back. The
completed form is sent to the Director
of Customs and Border Patrol who
processes it and returns the $1 per proof
gallon.
Respondents: Businesses or other forprofits.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,000
hours.
Clearance Officer: Frank Foote (202)
927–9347, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310
G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed (202)
395–7873, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10235, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–19074 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
August 3, 2009.
The Department of Treasury will
submit the following public information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 on or after the date
of publication of this notice. Copies of
the submission(s) may be obtained by
calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance
Officer listed. Comments regarding this
information collection should be
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed
and to the Treasury Department
Clearance Officer, Department of the
Treasury, Room 11000,1750
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20220.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Update to Identifying Information
Associated With Two Entities
Previously Designated Pursuant to
Executive Order 13382
AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Treasury Department’s
Office of Foreign Assets Control
(‘‘OFAC’’) has made changes to the
identifying information associated with
the following two entities, previously
designated pursuant to Executive Order
13382 of June 28, 2005, ‘‘Blocking
Property of Weapons of Mass
Destruction Proliferators and Their
Supporters.’’
FIRST PERSIA EQUITY FUND (a.k.a.
FIRST PERSIAN EQUITY FUND;
a.k.a. FPEF), Rafi Alley, Vali Asr
Avenue, Nader Alley, P.O. Box
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 152 (Monday, August 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40000-40003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19045]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Single Nuclear
Unit at the Bellefonte Site
AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice of intent (NOI) is provided in accordance with the
Council on Environmental Quality's regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508)
and Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) procedures for implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). TVA will prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) to update
information in the 1974 Final Environmental Statement for Bellefonte
Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 (1974 FES) and other pertinent
environmental reviews, in order to address the potential environmental
impacts associated with its proposal to operate a single nuclear
generation unit at the Bellefonte Nuclear Plant (BLN) site located in
Jackson County, Alabama. Currently, there are two partially constructed
units at the BLN site. TVA may choose to complete and operate either
one of these partially constructed units or construct and
[[Page 40001]]
operate one new technology unit. Operation of one nuclear unit capable
of producing approximately 1,100 megawatts (MW) of power would help
address the need for additional base load generation in the TVA power
service area; meet TVA's goal to have at least 50 percent of its
generation portfolio comprised of low or zero carbon-emitting sources
by the year 2020; and make beneficial use of existing assets at the BLN
site.
DATES: Comments on the draft SEIS will be invited from the public. It
is anticipated that the draft SEIS will be available in fall 2009. A
notice of availability of a draft SEIS will be published in the Federal
Register, as well as announced in the local news media.
ADDRESSES: Information about the SEIS may be obtained by contacting
Ruth M. Horton, Senior NEPA Specialist, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400
West Summit Hill Drive, Mail Stop WT 11D, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902;
by e-mailing to blnp@tva.gov; or by visiting the project Web site at
https://www.tva.gov/blnp.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about nuclear plant
construction and operation, contact Andrea Sterdis, Nuclear Generation
Development and Construction, Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market
Street, Mail Stop LP 5A, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 (e-mail:
alsterdis@tva.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
TVA Power System
TVA is an agency and instrumentality of the United States,
established by an act of Congress in 1933, to foster the social and
economic welfare of the people of the Tennessee Valley region and to
promote the proper use and conservation of the region's natural
resources. One component of this mission is the generation,
transmission, and sale of reliable and affordable electric energy. TVA
operates the nation's largest public power system, producing 4 percent
of all electricity in the nation. TVA provides electricity to most of
Tennessee and parts of Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama,
Mississippi, and Kentucky. It serves about 9 million people in this
seven-state region through 158 power distributors and 58 directly
served large industries and federal facilities. The TVA Act requires
the TVA power system to be self-supporting and operated on a nonprofit
basis, and the TVA Act directs TVA to sell power at rates as low as are
feasible.
Dependable capacity on the TVA power system is about 37,000 MW. TVA
generates most of this power with three nuclear plants, 11 coal-fired
plants, nine combustion-turbine plants, a combined-cycle plant, 29
hydroelectric dams, a pumped-storage facility, a wind farm, a methane-
gas cofiring facility, and several small renewable generating
facilities. A portion of delivered power is obtained through long-term
power purchase agreements. About 60 percent of TVA's annual generation
is from fossil fuels, predominantly coal; 30 percent is from nuclear;
and the remainder is from hydro and other renewable energy resources.
TVA transmits electricity from these facilities over almost 16,000
miles of transmission lines. Like other utility systems, TVA has power
interchange agreements with utilities surrounding the Tennessee Valley
region and purchases and sells power on an economic basis almost daily.
In the mid-1990s, TVA developed an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
with extensive public involvement. This process was completed with
publication of the Energy Vision 2020 Integrated Resource Plan and
Final Environmental Impact Statement (IRP/FEIS) in 1995 and the
associated record of decision (ROD) in 1996. Based on the extensive
evaluation, TVA decided to adopt a flexible portfolio of supply- and
demand-side energy resource options to meet the growing demand for
electricity in the region and achieve the goals of the TVA Act and
other congressional directives. The portfolio of alternatives analyzed
in the IRP/FEIS encompassed the current proposal to complete one
nuclear unit at the BLN site. On June 15, 2009, TVA announced its
intent to conduct a new comprehensive study and environmental impact
statement (EIS) entitled the Integrated Resource Plan. The proposal set
out in this NOI also supports TVA's goal of reducing its carbon
footprint by 2020 and the need to make beneficial use of the existing
infrastructure at the BLN site.
Bellefonte Nuclear Plant
The BLN site is located in northeast Alabama on 1,600 acres
adjacent to the Tennessee River at Mile 392, near the cities of
Hollywood and Scottsboro in Jackson County. The site includes two
partially completed Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) pressurized water reactors
known as BLN Units 1 and 2 (BLN 1&2), with a capacity of about 1,200 MW
each. The then Atomic Energy Commission (now called the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission or NRC) issued construction permits for BLN 1&2
on December 24, 1974. When TVA halted construction activities in 1988,
in response to decreased power demand, BLN 1 was approximately 90
percent compete, and BLN 2 was approximately 58 percent complete.
TVA maintained the plant in deferred status until November 2005,
when TVA's Board of Directors approved the cancellation of BLN 1&2 in
order to facilitate consideration of the BLN site for other possible
uses. TVA submitted a Site Redress Plan to the NRC, along with a
request for withdrawal of the construction permits. Under the redress
plan, TVA maintained environmental permits and equipment associated
with ongoing activities at BLN, including a training center and a
substation. The construction permits were withdrawn by the NRC in
September 2006. Subsequent asset recovery activities, along with more
recent inspections of remaining equipment, resulted in BLN 1&2 now
being considered approximately 55 percent and 35 percent complete,
respectively.
In 2006, TVA joined NuStart Energy Development LLC (NuStart), a
consortium of 10 utility companies and two reactor vendors, to
demonstrate the feasibility of processing a combined construction and
operating license application (COLA) under 10 CFR Part 52 and to
complete the design engineering for the Westinghouse AP1000 advanced
design for a pressurized water reactor. Preliminary designs for two new
reactors at BLN, known as Units 3 and 4 (BLN 3&4), were developed as
part of the application process. In choosing the BLN 3&4 proposal as a
COLA candidate, NuStart recognized that a substantial portion of the
existing BLN 1&2 equipment and ancillary structures (e.g., cooling
towers, intake structure, transmission switchyards) could be used to
support such a new facility and that their use could reduce the cost of
new construction. The COLA for BLN 3&4 was submitted to the NRC in
October 2007 with TVA as the applicant of record. The COLA described
the siting of two AP1000 reactors with an estimated thermal reactor
power level of 3,400 MW and a net electrical output of at least 1,100
MW from each reactor. Although TVA is the applicant of record for the
NuStart demonstration, TVA has not decided to construct these advanced
reactors at the BLN site.
In August 2008, in response to changes in power generation
economics since 2005 and the possible effects of constraints on the
availability of the worldwide supply of components needed for new
generation development, TVA requested reinstatement of the construction
[[Page 40002]]
permits for BLN 1&2. Reinstatement would allow TVA to return the units
to deferred status; resume preservation and maintenance activities; and
determine whether the completion of construction and operation of the
units would be a viable option. The NRC reinstated TVA's construction
permits for BLN 1&2 in terminated plant status in March 2009. TVA is
currently working to return the plant to deferred plant status. In
addition to this current SEIS, TVA is conducting a Detailed Scoping,
Estimating, and Planning (DSEP) study to further explore the
feasibility of completing BLN 1 or BLN 2.
In April 2009, NuStart transferred the initial licensing efforts
and reference plant designation for the AP1000 from BLN 3&4 to Southern
Nuclear's Plant Vogtle. The transfer of the reference designation will
help the NRC complete the reference plant licensing process sooner and
help move the industry closer to new plant construction and commercial
operation of the AP1000 technology. Notwithstanding the transfer of the
reference plant designation to Plant Vogtle, TVA is continuing to
pursue a combined operating license for BLN 3&4 to preserve future base
load generation options.
Proposed Action and Alternatives
To address the need for additional low or zero carbon-emitting base
load generation in the 2017 to 2020 time frame, TVA proposes to
supplement the 1974 FES and other pertinent environmental reviews
discussed in related documents identified below. The SEIS will evaluate
the Action Alternatives of (1) completing and operating one partially
completed B&W unit and (2) constructing and operating one new
Westinghouse AP1000 unit. For either of these two Action Alternatives,
use of the BLN site offers TVA the opportunity to maximize the value of
existing assets, minimize environmental disturbance from new plant
construction, and utilize licensing processes that are already
underway. TVA will also consider the No Action Alternative.
Under both Action Alternatives, the existing 161-kilovolt (kV) and
500-kV switchyards constructed on the BLN site would be refurbished and
reenergized; four 500-kV transmission lines that terminate in the BLN
switchyard would be reestablished; the right-of-way would be brought
back to current TVA standards; the capacity of nine existing
transmission lines would be increased; and two 161-kV transmission
lines that supply a 161-kV switchyard to provide site power would be
reestablished. TVA owns and operates the regional transmission system.
No decision to build any new generating capacity at the BLN site
has been made at this time. TVA is preparing this SEIS to supplement
the original 1974 FES and update the information in related documents
discussed below in order to inform decision makers and the public about
the potential for environmental impacts associated with a decision to
complete (or construct) and operate one unit at the BLN site. The draft
SEIS will be made available for public comment. In making its final
decision, the TVA Board will consider the assessment in this SEIS,
including input provided by reviewing agencies and the public, as well
as the information in the DSEP study and the cost and engineering
studies for the AP1000.
Summary of Relevant Environmental Reviews
Several evaluations in the form of environmental reviews, studies,
and white papers have been prepared for actions related to the
construction and operation of a nuclear plant or alternative power
generation source at the BLN site. As provided in the regulations (40
CFR Part 1502) for implementing NEPA, this SEIS will update, tier from,
and incorporate by reference information contained in these documents
about the BLN site and about nuclear plant construction and operation.
The environmental consequences of constructing and operating BLN
1&2 were addressed comprehensively in the 1974 FES. In 1993, TVA issued
a white paper in support of TVA's 120-day notice to NRC for resumption
of plant construction. The white paper reviewed 10 aspects of TVA's
proposal in the 1974 FES that had changed or were likely to change. TVA
subsequently chose not to resume construction.
Environmental conditions at the BLN site have been comprehensively
reviewed three more times since 1993. The 1997 FEIS for the Bellefonte
Conversion Project considered construction and operation of five types
of fossil fuel generation, four of which involved plants with total
electricity production capacity equivalent to BLN 1&2 (approximately
2,400 MW). The proposed combustion turbine plant was not constructed.
TVA participated as a cooperating agency with the Department of
Energy (DOE) in preparing an EIS evaluating the production of tritium
at one or more commercial light water reactors to ensure safe and
reliable tritium supply for U.S. defense needs. The FEIS for the
Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor addressed the
completion and operation of BLN 1&2 and updated the environmental
record with regard to their operation. TVA adopted this FEIS in May
2000. DOE did not select BLN for tritium production, and TVA's current
proposal to complete additional generating capacity at BLN does not
involve the production of tritium. The tritium production FEIS included
pertinent information on spent nuclear fuel management, health and
safety, decommissioning, as well as other topics.
Most recently in 2007, as a part of the COLA for BLN 3&4, TVA, as a
member of the NuStart consortium, prepared and submitted a
comprehensive environmental report (ER) entitled Bellefonte Nuclear
Plant Units 3&4, COL Application, Part 3, Environmental Report (COLA
ER), for the construction and operation of two Westinghouse AP1000
nuclear plants at the BLN site. In addition to updating the description
of environmental conditions at BLN and some operational aspects related
to the cooling water system, this report fully describes the
environmental effects of constructing and operating BLN 3&4. It also
contains a discussion of alternative sites and energy resource options.
In addition to documents directly related to the BLN site, two
other TVA documents are relevant to this SEIS. First is the above-
mentioned 1995 IRP/FEIS. Deferral and completion of BLN 1&2 were among
the suite of alternatives evaluated in the IRP/FEIS, but not as part of
the preferred alternative. This was because in the IRP's economic
analyses, TVA made conservative assumptions about the capacity factor
(roughly how much a unit would be able to run) achieved by nuclear
units. TVA's nuclear units, consistent with U.S. nuclear industry
performance, now routinely exceed this earlier assumed capacity factor,
which will be taken into account in the current consideration of
completing or constructing a single nuclear unit at the BLN site.
In February 2004, TVA issued the Reservoir Operations Study
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement evaluating the potential
environmental impacts of alternative ways for operating the agency's
reservoir system to produce overall greater public value for the people
of the Tennessee Valley. This FEIS evaluated, among other things, the
adequacy of the water supply necessary for reliable, efficient
operation of TVA generating facilities within the operating limits of
their National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits and other
permits. A ROD for this FEIS was issued
[[Page 40003]]
in May 2004. TVA will incorporate assumptions for reservoir operations
resulting from this FEIS review in the present evaluation.
Need for Power
The proposal under consideration by TVA is to meet the demand for
additional base load capacity on the TVA system and maximize the use of
existing assets by either completing one of the unfinished B&W units or
by constructing one new AP1000 unit. The environmental impacts of other
energy resource options were evaluated as part of TVA's IRP/FEIS and in
the COLA ER. This proposal also helps achieve TVA's goal to have at
least 50 percent of its generation portfolio comprised of low or zero
carbon-emitting sources by 2020.
Demand for energy in the TVA power service area is expected to grow
at an average rate of approximately 1.1 percent per year over the next
20 years. In addition, TVA continues to set new peaks for power demand
on its system, including a new all-time winter peak. TVA's current plan
to meet growing demand includes a diversified expansion portfolio of
market purchases (including up to 2,000 MW of renewable energy through
a public request for proposal), intermediate and peaking gas-fired
capacity, continued modernization of TVA's hydro plants to increase
their power producing capacity, and expansion of TVA's Generation
Partners Program. Combined with these actions, TVA anticipates having
to add new base load capacity to its system no later than the 2017-2020
time frame. As part of this SEIS, TVA will update the Need for Power
analysis, as well as consider any new environmental information.
Preliminary Identification of Environmental Issues
This SEIS will update the analyses of potential environmental,
cultural, recreational, and socioeconomic impacts resulting from
completion (or construction), operation, and maintenance of one nuclear
unit and of reenergizing and upgrading the existing transmission
system. The impact analyses will include, but not necessarily be
limited to, the potential impacts on water quality and use; vegetation;
wildlife; aquatic ecology; endangered and threatened species;
floodplains; wetlands; land use; recreational and managed areas;
visual, archaeological, and historic resources; noise; socioeconomics;
solid and hazardous waste; geology and seismology; meteorology, air
quality, and climate change; uranium fuels cycle effects and
radiological impacts; nuclear plant safety and security including
design basis accidents; and severe accidents and intentional
destructive acts. Information from TVA's and NRC's previous
environmental reviews (described above) relevant to the current
assessment will be incorporated by reference and summarized in the
SEIS.
Public and Agency Participation
This SEIS is being prepared to update information and to inform
decision makers and the public about the potential environmental
impacts of completing and operating a single nuclear unit at the BLN
site. The SEIS process also will provide the public an opportunity to
comment on TVA's analyses. Other federal, state, and local agencies and
governmental entities will be asked to comment, including the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Alabama
Department of Environmental Management, and Alabama Department of
Conservation and Natural Resources.
TVA will invite the review agencies and the public to submit
written, verbal, e-mail, or online comments on the draft SEIS. It is
anticipated that the draft SEIS will be released in fall 2009. Notice
of availability of the draft SEIS will be published in the Federal
Register, as well as announced in local news media. TVA expects to
release a final SEIS in early spring 2010.
Dated: August 4, 2009.
Anda A. Ray,
Senior Vice President & Environmental Executive, Office of Environment
and Research, Tennessee Valley Authority.
[FR Doc. E9-19045 Filed 8-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P