Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for License Amendment to Byproduct Materials License No. 06-00253-04 for Amendment of the License and Unrestricted Release of the Hartford Hospital's Research Facilities in Hartford, CT, 39344-39346 [E9-18819]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
39344
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 150 / Thursday, August 6, 2009 / Notices
the NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS).
Because your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or
contact information, the NRC cautions
you against including any information
in your submission that you do not want
to be publicly disclosed.
The NRC requests that any party
soliciting or aggregating comments
received from other persons for
submission to the NRC inform those
persons that the NRC will not edit their
comments to remove any identifying or
contact information, and therefore, they
should not include any information in
their comments that they do not want
publicly disclosed. You may submit
comments by any of the following
methods:
1. Mail comments to: Rulemaking and
Directives Branch, Mail Stop: TWB–05–
B01M, Division of Administrative
Services, Office of Administration, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
2. Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for documents filed under Docket ID
[NRC–2009–0345]. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
301–492–3668; e-mail
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
3. Fax comments to: Rulemaking and
Directives Branch, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission at (301) 492–3446.
Requests for technical information
about DG–5034 may be directed to the
NRC contact, Robert Norman at (301)
415–2278 or e-mail to
Robert.Norman@nrc.gov.
Comments would be most helpful if
received by October 1, 2009. Comments
received after that date will be
considered if it is practical to do so, but
the NRC is able to ensure consideration
only for comments received on or before
this date. Although a time limit is given,
comments and suggestions in
connection with items for inclusion in
guides currently being developed or
improvements in all published guides
are encouraged at any time.
Electronic copies of DG–5034 are
available through the NRC’s public Web
site under Draft Regulatory Guides in
the ‘‘Regulatory Guides’’ collection of
the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/. Electronic copies are also
available in ADAMS (https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html),
under Accession No. ML090930608.
In addition, regulatory guides are
available for inspection at the NRC’s
Public Document Room (PDR) located at
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:04 Aug 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
Maryland. The PDR’s mailing address is
USNRC PDR, Washington, DC 20555–
0001. The PDR can also be reached by
telephone at (301) 415–4737 or (800)
397–4205, by fax at (301) 415–3548, and
by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Regulatory guides are not
copyrighted, and Commission approval
is not required to reproduce them.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day
of July, 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John N. Ridgely,
Acting Chief, Regulatory Guide Development
Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of
Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. E9–18817 Filed 8–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Street in Hartford, Connecticut. Issuance
of the amendment would authorize
release of the Facility for unrestricted
use. The Licensee requested this action
in a letter dated March 28, 2008. The
NRC has prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) in support of this
proposed action in accordance with the
requirements of Title 10, Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 51 (10
CFR Part 51). Based on the EA, the NRC
has concluded that a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) is
appropriate with respect to the
proposed action. The amendment will
be issued to the Licensee following the
publication of this FONSI and EA in the
Federal Register.
II. Environmental Assessment
Identification of Proposed Action
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0343; Docket No. 030–01239]
Notice of Availability of Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for License
Amendment to Byproduct Materials
License No. 06–00253–04 for
Amendment of the License and
Unrestricted Release of the Hartford
Hospital’s Research Facilities in
Hartford, CT
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Issuance of Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for License
Amendment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Penny Lanzisera, Senior Health
Physicist, Medical Branch, Division of
Nuclear Materials Safety, Region I, 475
Allendale Road, King of Prussia,
Pennsylvania 19406; telephone (610)
337–5169; fax number (610) 337–5269;
or by e-mail: penny.lanzisera@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering the
issuance of a license amendment to
Byproduct Materials License No. 06–
00253–04. This license is held by
Hartford Hospital (the Licensee), for, in
part, Surgical Research on the second
floor of the Crane-East Building,
Medical Research on the third floor of
the Crane-East Building, Animal Care
and Research on the fourth floor of the
Crane-East Building, Immunochemistry
Research on the third floor of the Bliss
Wing, and Special Hematology Research
on the third floor of the High Building
(the Facility), located at 80 Seymour
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The proposed action would approve
the Licensee’s March 28, 2008 license
amendment request, resulting in release
of the Facility for unrestricted use.
License No. 06–00253–04 was issued on
October 11, 1956, pursuant to 10 CFR
Part 30, and has been amended
periodically since that time. This
license authorized the Licensee to use,
in part, unsealed byproduct material for
purposes of conducting research and
development activities on laboratory
bench tops and in hoods.
The Facility consists of office space
and laboratories located in three
buildings. The Facility is located in a
commercial area. Within the Facility,
use of licensed materials was confined
to 13,350 square feet in the Crane—East
Building, 2,400 square feet in the Bliss
Wing, and 210 square feet in the High
Building.
In July 2002, the Licensee ceased
licensed activities and initiated a survey
and decontamination of the Facility.
Based on the Licensee’s historical
knowledge of the site and the conditions
of the Facility, the Licensee determined
that only routine decontamination
activities, in accordance with their NRCapproved, operating radiation safety
procedures, were required. The Licensee
was not required to submit a
decommissioning plan to the NRC
because worker cleanup activities and
procedures are consistent with those
approved for routine operations. The
Licensee conducted surveys of the
Facility and provided information to the
NRC to demonstrate that it meets the
criteria in Subpart E of 10 CFR Part 20
for unrestricted release.
Need for the Proposed Action
The Licensee has ceased conducting
licensed activities at the Facility, and
seeks the unrestricted use of its Facility.
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 150 / Thursday, August 6, 2009 / Notices
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The historical review of licensed
activities conducted at the Facility
shows that such activities involved use
of the following radionuclides with halflives greater than 120 days: Hydrogen3 and carbon-14. Prior to performing the
final status survey, the Licensee
conducted decontamination activities,
as necessary, in the areas of the Facility
affected by these radionuclides.
The Licensee conducted a final status
survey on March 26, 2000, with followup surveys conducted on April 9, 2009.
This survey covered all laboratories,
counting rooms, offices, and animal
facilities located in the three research
buildings. The final status survey report
was attached to the Licensee’s
amendment request dated March 28,
2008, with follow-up surveys provided
on April 14, 2009. The Licensee elected
to demonstrate compliance with the
radiological criteria for unrestricted
release as specified in 10 CFR 20.1402
by using the screening approach
described in NUREG–1757,
‘‘Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning
Guidance,’’ Volume 2. The Licensee
used the radionuclide-specific derived
concentration guideline levels (DCGLs),
developed there by the NRC, which
comply with the dose criterion in 10
CFR 20.1402. These DCGLs define the
maximum amount of residual
radioactivity on building surfaces,
equipment, and materials, and in soils,
that will satisfy the NRC requirements
in Subpart E of 10 CFR Part 20 for
unrestricted release. The Licensee’s
final status survey results were below
these DCGLs and are in compliance
with the As Low As Reasonably
Achievable (ALARA) requirement of 10
CFR 20.1402. The NRC thus finds that
the Licensee’s final status survey results
are acceptable.
Based on its review, the staff has
determined that the affected
environment and any environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action are bounded by the impacts
evaluated by the ‘‘Generic
Environmental Impact Statement in
Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for License Termination of
NRC–Licensed Nuclear Facilities’’
(NUREG–1496) Volumes 1–3
(ML042310492, ML042320379, and
ML042330385). The staff finds there
were no significant environmental
impacts from the use of radioactive
material at the Facility. The NRC staff
reviewed the docket file records and the
final status survey report to identify any
non-radiological hazards that may have
impacted the environment surrounding
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:04 Aug 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
the Facility. No such hazards or impacts
to the environment were identified. The
NRC has identified no other radiological
or non-radiological activities in the area
that could result in cumulative
environmental impacts.
The NRC staff finds that the proposed
release of the Facility for unrestricted
use is in compliance with 10 CFR
20.1402. Based on its review, the staff
considered the impact of the residual
radioactivity at the Facility and
concluded that the proposed action will
not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
Due to the largely administrative
nature of the proposed action, its
environmental impacts are small.
Therefore, the only alternative the staff
considered is the no-action alternative,
under which the staff would leave
things as they are by simply denying the
amendment request. This no-action
alternative is not feasible because it
conflicts with 10 CFR 30.36(d),
requiring that decommissioning of
byproduct material facilities be
completed and approved by the NRC
after licensed activities cease. The
NRC’s analysis of the Licensee’s final
status survey data confirmed that the
Facility meets the requirements of 10
CFR 20.1402 for unrestricted release.
Additionally, denying the amendment
request would result in no change in
current environmental impacts. The
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and the no-action alternative are
therefore similar, and the no-action
alternative is accordingly not further
considered.
Conclusion
The NRC staff has concluded that the
proposed action is consistent with the
NRC’s unrestricted release criteria
specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Because
the proposed action will not
significantly impact the quality of the
human environment, the NRC staff
concludes that the proposed action is
the preferred alternative.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
NRC provided a draft of this
Environmental Assessment to the
Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection for review on
June 8, 2009. On July 14, 2009, the
Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection responded by
e-mail. The State agreed with the
conclusions of the EA, and otherwise
had no comments.
The NRC staff has determined that the
proposed action is of a procedural
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39345
nature, and will not affect listed species
or critical habitat. Therefore, no further
consultation is required under Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act. The
NRC staff has also determined that the
proposed action is not the type of
activity that has the potential to cause
effects on historic properties. Therefore,
no further consultation is required
under Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC staff has prepared this EA in
support of the proposed action. On the
basis of this EA, the NRC finds that
there are no significant environmental
impacts from the proposed action, and
that preparation of an environmental
impact statement is not warranted.
Accordingly, the NRC has determined
that a Finding of No Significant Impact
is appropriate.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action,
including the application for license
amendment and supporting
documentation, are available
electronically at the NRC’s Electronic
Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. From this site,
you can access the NRC’s Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS), which provides text
and image files of NRC’s public
documents. The documents related to
this action are listed below, along with
their ADAMS accession numbers.
1. Letter dated March 28, 2008
requesting amendment (ML081050466).
2. Letter dated April 7, 2009
providing additional information
(ML090980511).
3. Swipe Survey Analysis information
dated April 9, 2009 (ML091110096).
4. Letter dated May 28, 2009
providing additional information
(ML091490256).
5. NUREG–1757, ‘‘Consolidated
NMSS Decommissioning Guidance;’’
6. Title 10 Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 20, Subpart E,
‘‘Radiological Criteria for License
Termination;’’
7. Title 10, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 51, ‘‘Environmental
Protection Regulations for Domestic
Licensing and Related Regulatory
Functions;’’ and
8. NUREG–1496, ‘‘Generic
Environmental Impact Statement in
Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for License Termination of
NRC–Licensed Nuclear Facilities.’’
If you do not have access to ADAMS,
or if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the NRC Public Document Room (PDR)
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
39346
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 150 / Thursday, August 6, 2009 / Notices
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O 1 F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
Dated at Region I, 475 Allendale Road,
King of Prussia, PA this 28th day of July
2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
James P. Dwyer,
Chief, Commercial and R&D Branch, Division
of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region I.
[FR Doc. E9–18819 Filed 8–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2008–0639; Docket Nos. 030–05224
and 040–08478]
Notice of Availability of Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for License
Amendments to Byproduct Materials
License No. 29–00170–03 and Source
Materials License No. SMB–1260,
Incorporating the Decommissioning
Plan for Bell Laboratories Murray Hill
Facility in Murray Hill, NJ
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Issuance of Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for License
Amendment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Hammann, Health Physicist,
Commercial and R&D Branch, Division
of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region I,
475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia,
Pennsylvania; telephone 610–337–5399;
fax number 610–337–5269; or by e-mail:
stephen.hammann@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering the
issuance of license amendments to
Byproduct Materials License No. 29–
00170–03 and Source Materials License
No. SMB–1260. The licenses are held by
Bell Laboratories (the Licensee), for its
Murray Hill Facility, located at 600
Mountain Avenue in Murray Hill, New
Jersey (the Facility). Issuance of the
amendments would incorporate the
Decommissioning Plan (DP) into the
licenses to allow completion of
decommissioning activities at the site
and subsequent release of the Facility,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:04 Aug 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
except one room in the Radiation Lab,
for unrestricted use and the termination
of its NRC materials licenses. The room
which is not being released is covered
by NRC License No. 29–00170–08. The
NRC has evaluated and approved the
Licensee’s DP. The findings of this
evaluation are documented in a Safety
Evaluation Report which will be issued
along with the amendments. The
Licensee requested these actions in a
letter dated June 12, 2008. The
Licensee’s amendment requests were
noted in the Federal Register on
December 8, 2008 (73 FR 74529). This
Federal Register notice also provided an
opportunity for a hearing on these
licensing actions. No hearing requests
were received. The NRC has prepared
an Environmental Assessment (EA) in
support of the proposed actions in
accordance with the requirements of
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51). Based
on the EA, the NRC has concluded that
a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) is appropriate with respect to
the proposed actions. The amendments
will be issued to the Licensee following
the publication of this FONSI and EA in
the Federal Register.
II. Environmental Assessment
Identification of Proposed Action
The proposed actions would approve
the Licensee’s June 12, 2008 license
amendment requests to incorporate the
DP into the licenses, resulting in
decommissioning of the facility and
subsequent release of the Facility,
except one room in the Radiation Lab,
for unrestricted use and the termination
of its NRC materials licenses. The room
which is not being released is covered
by NRC License No. 29–00170–08.
License No. 29–00170–03 was issued on
January 25, 1957, pursuant to 10 CFR
Part 30, and License No. SMB–1260 was
issued on December 2, 1975, pursuant to
10 CFR Part 40. Both licenses have been
amended periodically since the issue
dates. These licenses authorized the
Licensee to use sealed and unsealed
byproduct material and source material
for the purpose of conducting research
and development activities on
laboratory bench tops and in hoods.
The Facility is situated on 196 acres
and encompasses fifteen buildings. The
buildings in which licensed materials
were used consist of office space and
laboratories. The Facility is located in a
mixed residential/commercial area.
Within the Facility, use of licensed
materials was confined to Buildings
1,2,6,7 and 15. Notification that all
licensed activities had ceased was
received April 26, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed actions are to approve
the DP so that the Licensee may
complete Facility decommissioning
activities. Completion of the
decommissioning activities will reduce
residual radioactivity at the Facility.
NRC regulations require licensees to
begin timely decommissioning of their
sites, or any separate buildings that
contain residual radioactivity, upon
cessation of licensed activities, in
accordance with 10 CFR 30.36(d) and 10
CFR 40.42(d). The proposed licensing
actions will support such a goal. NRC is
fulfilling its responsibilities under the
Atomic Energy Act to make a decision
on the proposed license amendments for
decommissioning that ensures
protection of the public health and
safety.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The historical review of licensed
activities conducted at the Facility
shows that such activities involved
research and development activities
using sealed and unsealed byproduct
material and source material. The
licensed materials were always stored
and used inside buildings with no
releases.
The NRC staff has reviewed the
Licensee amendment requests for the
Facility and examined the impacts of
these license amendment requests.
Potential impacts include water
resource impact (e.g., water may be used
for dust control), air quality impacts
from dust emissions, temporary local
traffic impacts resulting from
transporting debris, human health
impacts, noise impacts from equipment
operation, scenic quality impacts, and
waste management impacts.
Based on its review, the staff has
determined that no surface water or
ground water impacts are expected from
the decommissioning activities.
Additionally, the staff has determined
that significant air quality, noise, land
use, and off-site radiation exposure
impacts are also not expected. No
significant air quality impacts are
anticipated because of the limited
amount of contamination and the
controls that will be implemented by
the Licensee during decommissioning
activities. In addition, the
environmental impacts associated with
the decommissioning activities are
bounded by impacts evaluated by
NUREG–0586, ‘‘Final Generic
Environmental Impact Statement on the
Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities,’’
(GEIS). Generic impacts for this type of
decommissioning process were
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39344-39346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18819]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2009-0343; Docket No. 030-01239]
Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of
No Significant Impact for License Amendment to Byproduct Materials
License No. 06-00253-04 for Amendment of the License and Unrestricted
Release of the Hartford Hospital's Research Facilities in Hartford, CT
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Issuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for License Amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Penny Lanzisera, Senior Health
Physicist, Medical Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region
I, 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406; telephone
(610) 337-5169; fax number (610) 337-5269; or by e-mail:
penny.lanzisera@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the
issuance of a license amendment to Byproduct Materials License No. 06-
00253-04. This license is held by Hartford Hospital (the Licensee),
for, in part, Surgical Research on the second floor of the Crane-East
Building, Medical Research on the third floor of the Crane-East
Building, Animal Care and Research on the fourth floor of the Crane-
East Building, Immunochemistry Research on the third floor of the Bliss
Wing, and Special Hematology Research on the third floor of the High
Building (the Facility), located at 80 Seymour Street in Hartford,
Connecticut. Issuance of the amendment would authorize release of the
Facility for unrestricted use. The Licensee requested this action in a
letter dated March 28, 2008. The NRC has prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) in support of this proposed action in accordance with
the requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part
51 (10 CFR Part 51). Based on the EA, the NRC has concluded that a
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is appropriate with respect to
the proposed action. The amendment will be issued to the Licensee
following the publication of this FONSI and EA in the Federal Register.
II. Environmental Assessment
Identification of Proposed Action
The proposed action would approve the Licensee's March 28, 2008
license amendment request, resulting in release of the Facility for
unrestricted use. License No. 06-00253-04 was issued on October 11,
1956, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 30, and has been amended periodically
since that time. This license authorized the Licensee to use, in part,
unsealed byproduct material for purposes of conducting research and
development activities on laboratory bench tops and in hoods.
The Facility consists of office space and laboratories located in
three buildings. The Facility is located in a commercial area. Within
the Facility, use of licensed materials was confined to 13,350 square
feet in the Crane--East Building, 2,400 square feet in the Bliss Wing,
and 210 square feet in the High Building.
In July 2002, the Licensee ceased licensed activities and initiated
a survey and decontamination of the Facility. Based on the Licensee's
historical knowledge of the site and the conditions of the Facility,
the Licensee determined that only routine decontamination activities,
in accordance with their NRC-approved, operating radiation safety
procedures, were required. The Licensee was not required to submit a
decommissioning plan to the NRC because worker cleanup activities and
procedures are consistent with those approved for routine operations.
The Licensee conducted surveys of the Facility and provided information
to the NRC to demonstrate that it meets the criteria in Subpart E of 10
CFR Part 20 for unrestricted release.
Need for the Proposed Action
The Licensee has ceased conducting licensed activities at the
Facility, and seeks the unrestricted use of its Facility.
[[Page 39345]]
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The historical review of licensed activities conducted at the
Facility shows that such activities involved use of the following
radionuclides with half-lives greater than 120 days: Hydrogen-3 and
carbon-14. Prior to performing the final status survey, the Licensee
conducted decontamination activities, as necessary, in the areas of the
Facility affected by these radionuclides.
The Licensee conducted a final status survey on March 26, 2000,
with follow-up surveys conducted on April 9, 2009. This survey covered
all laboratories, counting rooms, offices, and animal facilities
located in the three research buildings. The final status survey report
was attached to the Licensee's amendment request dated March 28, 2008,
with follow-up surveys provided on April 14, 2009. The Licensee elected
to demonstrate compliance with the radiological criteria for
unrestricted release as specified in 10 CFR 20.1402 by using the
screening approach described in NUREG-1757, ``Consolidated NMSS
Decommissioning Guidance,'' Volume 2. The Licensee used the
radionuclide-specific derived concentration guideline levels (DCGLs),
developed there by the NRC, which comply with the dose criterion in 10
CFR 20.1402. These DCGLs define the maximum amount of residual
radioactivity on building surfaces, equipment, and materials, and in
soils, that will satisfy the NRC requirements in Subpart E of 10 CFR
Part 20 for unrestricted release. The Licensee's final status survey
results were below these DCGLs and are in compliance with the As Low As
Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) requirement of 10 CFR 20.1402. The NRC
thus finds that the Licensee's final status survey results are
acceptable.
Based on its review, the staff has determined that the affected
environment and any environmental impacts associated with the proposed
action are bounded by the impacts evaluated by the ``Generic
Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities''
(NUREG-1496) Volumes 1-3 (ML042310492, ML042320379, and ML042330385).
The staff finds there were no significant environmental impacts from
the use of radioactive material at the Facility. The NRC staff reviewed
the docket file records and the final status survey report to identify
any non-radiological hazards that may have impacted the environment
surrounding the Facility. No such hazards or impacts to the environment
were identified. The NRC has identified no other radiological or non-
radiological activities in the area that could result in cumulative
environmental impacts.
The NRC staff finds that the proposed release of the Facility for
unrestricted use is in compliance with 10 CFR 20.1402. Based on its
review, the staff considered the impact of the residual radioactivity
at the Facility and concluded that the proposed action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the human environment.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
Due to the largely administrative nature of the proposed action,
its environmental impacts are small. Therefore, the only alternative
the staff considered is the no-action alternative, under which the
staff would leave things as they are by simply denying the amendment
request. This no-action alternative is not feasible because it
conflicts with 10 CFR 30.36(d), requiring that decommissioning of
byproduct material facilities be completed and approved by the NRC
after licensed activities cease. The NRC's analysis of the Licensee's
final status survey data confirmed that the Facility meets the
requirements of 10 CFR 20.1402 for unrestricted release. Additionally,
denying the amendment request would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action
and the no-action alternative are therefore similar, and the no-action
alternative is accordingly not further considered.
Conclusion
The NRC staff has concluded that the proposed action is consistent
with the NRC's unrestricted release criteria specified in 10 CFR
20.1402. Because the proposed action will not significantly impact the
quality of the human environment, the NRC staff concludes that the
proposed action is the preferred alternative.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
NRC provided a draft of this Environmental Assessment to the
Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection for review on June
8, 2009. On July 14, 2009, the Connecticut Department of Environmental
Protection responded by e-mail. The State agreed with the conclusions
of the EA, and otherwise had no comments.
The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action is of a
procedural nature, and will not affect listed species or critical
habitat. Therefore, no further consultation is required under Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act. The NRC staff has also determined that
the proposed action is not the type of activity that has the potential
to cause effects on historic properties. Therefore, no further
consultation is required under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC staff has prepared this EA in support of the proposed
action. On the basis of this EA, the NRC finds that there are no
significant environmental impacts from the proposed action, and that
preparation of an environmental impact statement is not warranted.
Accordingly, the NRC has determined that a Finding of No Significant
Impact is appropriate.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action, including the application for
license amendment and supporting documentation, are available
electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, you can access the
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), which
provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. The documents
related to this action are listed below, along with their ADAMS
accession numbers.
1. Letter dated March 28, 2008 requesting amendment (ML081050466).
2. Letter dated April 7, 2009 providing additional information
(ML090980511).
3. Swipe Survey Analysis information dated April 9, 2009
(ML091110096).
4. Letter dated May 28, 2009 providing additional information
(ML091490256).
5. NUREG-1757, ``Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance;''
6. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 20, Subpart E,
``Radiological Criteria for License Termination;''
7. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 51, ``Environmental
Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory
Functions;'' and
8. NUREG-1496, ``Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support
of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-
Licensed Nuclear Facilities.''
If you do not have access to ADAMS, or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public
Document Room (PDR)
[[Page 39346]]
Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to
pdr@nrc.gov. These documents may also be viewed electronically on the
public computers located at the NRC's PDR, O 1 F21, One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction
contractor will copy documents for a fee.
Dated at Region I, 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, PA this
28th day of July 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
James P. Dwyer,
Chief, Commercial and R&D Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety,
Region I.
[FR Doc. E9-18819 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
