Marketing and Sale of Fluid Milk in Schools, 38889-38890 [E9-18690]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 5, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
may seek a civil remedy for the agency’s:
Refusal to amend a record; refusal to comply
with a request for access to records; failure
to maintain accurate, relevant, timely and
complete records; or failure to otherwise
comply with an individual’s right to access
or amend records.
Dated: July 30, 2009.
Mary Ellen Callahan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E9–18620 Filed 8–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–28–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Part 210
[FNS–2005–0009]
RIN 0584–AD83
Marketing and Sale of Fluid Milk in
Schools
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final Rule.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY: This rule finalizes the interim
rule that implemented the statutory
provision to prohibit direct or indirect
restrictions on the sale or marketing of
fluid milk on school premises or at
school-sponsored events, at any time or
in any place, in schools participating in
the National School Lunch Program.
This rule ensures that there are no
policies or procedures in place that have
the effect of restricting the sale or
marketing of fluid milk.
DATES: Effective Date: This action is
effective September 4, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Rothstein, Chief, Policy and
Program Development Branch, Child
Nutrition Division, Food and Nutrition
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 640,
Alexandria, Virginia 22302–1594; or
(703) 305–2590; or
CNDINTERNET@fns.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 102 of the Child Nutrition and
WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004 (Pub.
L. 108–265) amended section 9(a)(2) of
the Richard B. Russell National School
Lunch Act, 42 U.S.C. 1758, by adding a
provision that prohibits schools
participating in the National School
Lunch Program (NSLP), or any person
approved by a school participating in
the NSLP, from directly or indirectly
restricting the sale or marketing of fluid
milk products at any time or in any
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:20 Aug 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
place on school premises or at schoolsponsored events. The Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS) published an
interim rule on November 21, 2005 (70
FR 70031) to prohibit school food
authorities (SFAs) from entering into
contracts that restrict the sale or
marketing of fluid milk.
Contracts between SFAs and vendors
can be structured to restrict the variety
or types of food choices a school may
offer outside of the school meal
programs. Prior to implementation of
the interim rule, some exclusive
vending contracts were found to have
the potential to limit a school’s ability
to sell or market fluid milk on school
premises outside of the school meal
programs; however, very few if any were
found to actually limit the sale or
marketing of fluid milk.
The intent of this rule is to ensure no
vending contract restricts a school’s
ability or discretion to provide children
access to fluid milk outside of the
school meal programs. This rule does
not require that participating schools
sell or market fluid milk outside of the
NSLP, or make fluid milk available at
school-sponsored events. Furthermore,
this rule does not affect the
requirements for offering fluid milk as
part of a reimbursable lunch in the
NSLP as described in 7 CFR 210.10(m).
For additional background
information, please refer to the interim
rule.
II. Discussion of Public Comments and
FNS Response
FNS received a total of eight
comments during the 180-day comment
period that ended on May 22, 2006. The
commenters included representatives
from dairy industry trade associations
(3), a school food authority (1), a State
agency (1), and individuals (3).
Of the eight comments received, six of
the commenters, including one
individual and the representatives from
a school food authority, a State agency,
and the trade associations, were in
support of finalizing the requirements as
established by the interim rule to
prohibit any restriction of the sale or
marketing of fluid milk in participating
schools.
One commenter in support of the
provision also felt that the Department
should extend the rulemaking to
prohibit or restrict all exclusive
beverage contracts in participating
schools.
Under existing NSLP regulations at 7
CFR 210.21, SFAs must comply with
requirements intended to ensure the
integrity of procurement practices for
the purchase of goods and services with
funds from the nonprofit school
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38889
foodservice account. Furthermore, NSLP
regulations provide SFAs with the
flexibility to enter into vending
contracts that best meet their needs for
foods and beverages sold outside of the
school meal programs. This rulemaking
is intended to ensure vending contracts
do not directly or indirectly restrict the
sale or marketing of fluid milk at any
time or in any place on school premises
or at school-sponsored events. Other
procurement issues regarding vending
contracts and agreements are outside the
scope of this rulemaking.
Two of the individual commenters
expressed opposition to implementing
the rule as final because of concern that
it favors dairy industry interests and
inhibits schools’ ability to choose
whether to sell or market fluid milk.
One commenter also disapproved of
conventional dairy production
practices.
This rulemaking does not require or
promote the sale or marketing of fluid
milk outside the school meal programs.
SFAs retain the authority to establish
procurement contracts in accordance
with Program regulations for foods sold
outside of the school meal programs that
best meet the nutritional and
operational needs of their students and
schools.
Finally, discussion of conventional
dairy production practices is outside the
scope of this rulemaking.
FNS considered all comments
received and determined that these
comments did not warrant any changes
to the requirements established by the
interim rule, or were outside the scope
of the interim rule. FNS is issuing the
interim rule as final without revision.
III. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
non-significant and is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed with
regard to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612). Implementation of this rule is
not expected to impose a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. No later than
the beginning of School Year 2006–
2007, SFAs were required by section
102 of Public Law 108–265 to ensure
that any existing or new vending
contracts did not include provisions
that restrict the sale or marketing of
fluid milk. Therefore, the number of
SFAs expected to be impacted by this
rule is minimal.
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
38890
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 5, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
the Department generally must prepare
a written statement, including a cost/
benefit analysis, for proposed and final
rules with Federal mandates that may
result in expenditures to State, local, or
tribal governments in the aggregate, or
to the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year. When such a
statement is needed for a rule, section
205 of the UMRA generally requires the
Department to identify and consider a
reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives and adopt the least costly,
more cost-effective or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal
mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) that
impose costs on State, local, or tribal
governments or to the private sector of
$100 million or more in any one year.
This rule is, therefore, not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
the UMRA.
Executive Order 12372
The National School Lunch Program
is listed in the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance under No. 10.555.
For the reasons set forth in the final rule
in 7 CFR part 3015, Subpart V and
related Notice [48 FR 29115, June 24,
1983], this program is included in the
scope of Executive Order 12372, which
requires intergovernmental consultation
with State and local officials.
Since the NSLP is a Stateadministered, federally funded program,
FNS headquarters and regional office
staff have ongoing formal and informal
discussions with State and local
officials regarding program
implementation and policy issues. This
arrangement allows State and local
agencies to provide feedback that
contributes to any discretionary
decisions made in establishing
requirements for rules that govern the
NSLP.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 requires
Federal agencies to consider the impact
of their regulatory actions on State and
local governments. Where such actions
have federalism implications, agencies
are directed to provide a statement for
inclusion in the preamble to the
regulations describing the agency’s
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:20 Aug 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
considerations in terms of the three
categories called for under section
(6)(b)(2)(B) of Executive Order 13132.
FNS has considered the impact of this
rule on State and local governments and
has determined that this rule does not
have federalism implications. This rule
does not impose substantial or direct
compliance costs on State and local
governments. Therefore, under section
6(b) of the Executive Order, a federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is intended to have
preemptive effect with respect to any
State or local laws, regulations, or
policies which conflict with its
provisions or which would otherwise
impede its full implementation. This
rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect. Prior to any judicial challenge to
the provisions of this rule or the
application of its provisions, all
applicable administrative procedures
under § 210.18(q) or § 235.11(f) must be
exhausted.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
Under USDA Regulation 4300–4,
‘‘Civil Rights Impact Analysis,’’ FNS has
reviewed this final rule to identify and
address any major civil rights impacts
the rule might have on children on the
basis of age, race, color, national origin,
sex or disability. After a careful review
of the rule’s intent and provisions, FNS
has determined that this rule does not
affect the participation of protected
individuals in the Child Nutrition
Programs. FNS found no factors that
would negatively and
disproportionately affect any group of
individuals.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. Chap. 35; see 5 CFR 1320)
requires that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) approve all
collections of information by a Federal
agency from the public before they can
be implemented. Respondents are not
required to respond to any collection of
information unless it displays a current
valid OMB control number. This rule
does not contain any information
collection requirements subject to
approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
E–Government Act Compliance
The FNS is committed to complying
with the E–Government Act of 2002, to
promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies to
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 210
Grant programs—education, Grant
programs—health, Infants and children,
Nutrition, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, School
breakfast and lunch programs, Surplus
agricultural commodities.
PART 210—NATIONAL SCHOOL
LUNCH PROGRAM
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 7 CFR Part 210 which was
published at 70 FR 70031 on November
21, 2005, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
■
Dated: July 29, 2009.
Julia Paradis,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. E9–18690 Filed 8–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 50
[NRC–2008–0663]
RIN 3150–AI53
Industry Codes and Standards;
Amended Requirements
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: The NRC is amending its
regulations governing vessel head
inspection requirements. This
amendment revises the upper range of
the percentage of axial flaws permitted
in a specimen set used for the
qualification of nondestructive
examination systems (procedures,
personnel and equipment), which are
used in the performance of inservice
inspection (ISI) of pressurized water
reactor (PWR) upper vessel head
penetrations. This amendment is being
made as a result of the withdrawal of a
stakeholder’s recommendation
necessitated by a typographical error in
the original recommendation with
respect to the maximum percentage of
flaws that should be oriented axially.
DATES: Effective Date: The final rule will
become effective October 19, 2009,
unless significant adverse comments are
received by September 4, 2009. A
significant adverse comment is a
comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38889-38890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18690]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Part 210
[FNS-2005-0009]
RIN 0584-AD83
Marketing and Sale of Fluid Milk in Schools
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule finalizes the interim rule that implemented the
statutory provision to prohibit direct or indirect restrictions on the
sale or marketing of fluid milk on school premises or at school-
sponsored events, at any time or in any place, in schools participating
in the National School Lunch Program. This rule ensures that there are
no policies or procedures in place that have the effect of restricting
the sale or marketing of fluid milk.
DATES: Effective Date: This action is effective September 4, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Rothstein, Chief, Policy and
Program Development Branch, Child Nutrition Division, Food and
Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center
Drive, Room 640, Alexandria, Virginia 22302-1594; or (703) 305-2590; or
CNDINTERNET@fns.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 102 of the Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of
2004 (Pub. L. 108-265) amended section 9(a)(2) of the Richard B.
Russell National School Lunch Act, 42 U.S.C. 1758, by adding a
provision that prohibits schools participating in the National School
Lunch Program (NSLP), or any person approved by a school participating
in the NSLP, from directly or indirectly restricting the sale or
marketing of fluid milk products at any time or in any place on school
premises or at school-sponsored events. The Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS) published an interim rule on November 21, 2005 (70 FR 70031) to
prohibit school food authorities (SFAs) from entering into contracts
that restrict the sale or marketing of fluid milk.
Contracts between SFAs and vendors can be structured to restrict
the variety or types of food choices a school may offer outside of the
school meal programs. Prior to implementation of the interim rule, some
exclusive vending contracts were found to have the potential to limit a
school's ability to sell or market fluid milk on school premises
outside of the school meal programs; however, very few if any were
found to actually limit the sale or marketing of fluid milk.
The intent of this rule is to ensure no vending contract restricts
a school's ability or discretion to provide children access to fluid
milk outside of the school meal programs. This rule does not require
that participating schools sell or market fluid milk outside of the
NSLP, or make fluid milk available at school-sponsored events.
Furthermore, this rule does not affect the requirements for offering
fluid milk as part of a reimbursable lunch in the NSLP as described in
7 CFR 210.10(m).
For additional background information, please refer to the interim
rule.
II. Discussion of Public Comments and FNS Response
FNS received a total of eight comments during the 180-day comment
period that ended on May 22, 2006. The commenters included
representatives from dairy industry trade associations (3), a school
food authority (1), a State agency (1), and individuals (3).
Of the eight comments received, six of the commenters, including
one individual and the representatives from a school food authority, a
State agency, and the trade associations, were in support of finalizing
the requirements as established by the interim rule to prohibit any
restriction of the sale or marketing of fluid milk in participating
schools.
One commenter in support of the provision also felt that the
Department should extend the rulemaking to prohibit or restrict all
exclusive beverage contracts in participating schools.
Under existing NSLP regulations at 7 CFR 210.21, SFAs must comply
with requirements intended to ensure the integrity of procurement
practices for the purchase of goods and services with funds from the
nonprofit school foodservice account. Furthermore, NSLP regulations
provide SFAs with the flexibility to enter into vending contracts that
best meet their needs for foods and beverages sold outside of the
school meal programs. This rulemaking is intended to ensure vending
contracts do not directly or indirectly restrict the sale or marketing
of fluid milk at any time or in any place on school premises or at
school-sponsored events. Other procurement issues regarding vending
contracts and agreements are outside the scope of this rulemaking.
Two of the individual commenters expressed opposition to
implementing the rule as final because of concern that it favors dairy
industry interests and inhibits schools' ability to choose whether to
sell or market fluid milk. One commenter also disapproved of
conventional dairy production practices.
This rulemaking does not require or promote the sale or marketing
of fluid milk outside the school meal programs. SFAs retain the
authority to establish procurement contracts in accordance with Program
regulations for foods sold outside of the school meal programs that
best meet the nutritional and operational needs of their students and
schools.
Finally, discussion of conventional dairy production practices is
outside the scope of this rulemaking.
FNS considered all comments received and determined that these
comments did not warrant any changes to the requirements established by
the interim rule, or were outside the scope of the interim rule. FNS is
issuing the interim rule as final without revision.
III. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be non-significant and is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed with regard to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). Implementation of this
rule is not expected to impose a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. No later than the beginning of
School Year 2006-2007, SFAs were required by section 102 of Public Law
108-265 to ensure that any existing or new vending contracts did not
include provisions that restrict the sale or marketing of fluid milk.
Therefore, the number of SFAs expected to be impacted by this rule is
minimal.
[[Page 38890]]
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, the
Department generally must prepare a written statement, including a
cost/benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with Federal
mandates that may result in expenditures to State, local, or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million
or more in any one year. When such a statement is needed for a rule,
section 205 of the UMRA generally requires the Department to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt
the least costly, more cost-effective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) that impose costs on State, local,
or tribal governments or to the private sector of $100 million or more
in any one year. This rule is, therefore, not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Executive Order 12372
The National School Lunch Program is listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 10.555. For the reasons set forth
in the final rule in 7 CFR part 3015, Subpart V and related Notice [48
FR 29115, June 24, 1983], this program is included in the scope of
Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation
with State and local officials.
Since the NSLP is a State-administered, federally funded program,
FNS headquarters and regional office staff have ongoing formal and
informal discussions with State and local officials regarding program
implementation and policy issues. This arrangement allows State and
local agencies to provide feedback that contributes to any
discretionary decisions made in establishing requirements for rules
that govern the NSLP.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 requires Federal agencies to consider the
impact of their regulatory actions on State and local governments.
Where such actions have federalism implications, agencies are directed
to provide a statement for inclusion in the preamble to the regulations
describing the agency's considerations in terms of the three categories
called for under section (6)(b)(2)(B) of Executive Order 13132. FNS has
considered the impact of this rule on State and local governments and
has determined that this rule does not have federalism implications.
This rule does not impose substantial or direct compliance costs on
State and local governments. Therefore, under section 6(b) of the
Executive Order, a federalism summary impact statement is not required.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is intended to have preemptive effect with
respect to any State or local laws, regulations, or policies which
conflict with its provisions or which would otherwise impede its full
implementation. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
Prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule or the
application of its provisions, all applicable administrative procedures
under Sec. 210.18(q) or Sec. 235.11(f) must be exhausted.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
Under USDA Regulation 4300-4, ``Civil Rights Impact Analysis,'' FNS
has reviewed this final rule to identify and address any major civil
rights impacts the rule might have on children on the basis of age,
race, color, national origin, sex or disability. After a careful review
of the rule's intent and provisions, FNS has determined that this rule
does not affect the participation of protected individuals in the Child
Nutrition Programs. FNS found no factors that would negatively and
disproportionately affect any group of individuals.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chap. 35; see 5 CFR
1320) requires that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve
all collections of information by a Federal agency from the public
before they can be implemented. Respondents are not required to respond
to any collection of information unless it displays a current valid OMB
control number. This rule does not contain any information collection
requirements subject to approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
E-Government Act Compliance
The FNS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act of
2002, to promote the use of the Internet and other information
technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to
Government information and services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 210
Grant programs--education, Grant programs--health, Infants and
children, Nutrition, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, School breakfast and lunch programs, Surplus agricultural
commodities.
PART 210--NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 7 CFR Part 210 which was
published at 70 FR 70031 on November 21, 2005, is adopted as a final
rule without change.
Dated: July 29, 2009.
Julia Paradis,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. E9-18690 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P