Airworthiness Directives; Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) IO-520, TSIO-520, and IO-550 Series Reciprocating Engines With Superior Air Parts, Inc. (SAP) Cylinder Assemblies Installed, 38896-38899 [E9-18220]
Download as PDF
38896
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 5, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0051; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NE–37–AD; Amendment 39–
15986; AD 2009–16–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Teledyne
Continental Motors (TCM) IO–520,
TSIO–520, and IO–550 Series
Reciprocating Engines With Superior
Air Parts, Inc. (SAP) Cylinder
Assemblies Installed
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
TCM IO–520, TSIO–520, and IO–550
series reciprocating engines, with
certain SAP investment cast cylinder
assemblies installed. This AD requires
initial and repetitive inspections and
compression tests to detect cracks in
those cylinders with more than 750
flight hours (FH) time-in-service (TIS).
This AD results from reports of cracks
in the area of the exhaust valve and
separation of cylinder heads from the
barrels of SAP cylinder assemblies with
certain part numbers. We are issuing
this AD to prevent the separation of the
cylinder head, which could result in
immediate loss of engine power,
possible structural damage to the
engine, and possible fire in the engine
compartment.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
September 9, 2009. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulations as
of September 9, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You can get the service
information identified in this AD from
Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc., P.O.
Box 90, Mobile, Alabama; telephone
(251) 438–3411, or go to: https://
www.genuinecontinental.aero.
The Docket Operations office is
located at Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter W. Hakala, Aerospace Engineer,
Special Certification Office, FAA,
Rotorcraft Directorate, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; e-mail:
peter.w.hakala@faa.gov; telephone (817)
222–5145; fax (817) 222–5785.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:20 Aug 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
The FAA
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with
a proposed AD. The proposed AD
applies to certain TCM IO–520, TSIO–
520, and IO–550 reciprocating engines
with SAP investment cast cylinder
assemblies, part numbers (P/Ns)
SA52000–A1, SA52000–A20P,
SA52000–A21P, SA52000–A22P,
SA52000–A23P, SA55000–A1, or
SA55000–A20P, installed. We
published the proposed AD in the
Federal Register on April 11, 2008, (73
FR 19772). That action proposed to
require initial and repetitive inspections
and compression tests to detect cracks
in those cylinders with more than 750
FH TIS.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is provided in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comments received.
Requests to Not Issue an AD Against the
SAP Cylinders
Four commenters suggest we not issue
an AD against the SAP cylinders
because the SAP cylinder assemblies
have a lower failure rate than the OEM
cylinder assemblies. One commenter
suggests that SAP should issue a
detailed service bulletin to address the
service difficulty conditions.
We don’t agree. We confirmed that
nine SAP cylinder assemblies failed
with a head separation condition, which
could result in loss of control of the
airplane. Superior Air Parts, Inc.
investigated the cause for the failure of
the cylinder assemblies. Because the
cylinder assemblies failed with a
separation condition from propagation
of metal fatigue cracks, we determined
that this failure condition is a direct
safety hazard to the airplane. This
proposed AD is necessary to ensure that
these cylinder assemblies are
periodically inspected, and removed
from service at engine overhaul to
prevent this unsafe condition. We did
not change the AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Absence of Data To Show Serial
Number Distribution
One commenter suggests we examine
the distribution of the cracks across the
range of serial numbers and perform a
statistical analysis to try to identify a
process change or a design change that
may be a contributor to the failed SAP
cylinder assemblies.
We agree. We examined the
distribution of the cracks, and collected
and analyzed in service data of the
cylinder assemblies. We found the
failed cylinder assemblies were not in
any specific serial number sequence.
The failed serial numbers ranged from
low to high within the serial number
range, so the time to failure of the
cylinder assemblies were unpredictable.
We did not change the AD.
Requests To Change 50-Hour
Inspections to 100-Hour or Annual
Inspections
Twenty commenters suggest that
requiring a 50-hour repetitive inspection
for cylinder leaks is unnecessary and
burdensome at 50-hour intervals. The
commenters suggest that we change the
repetitive inspection requirements to
allow performing the inspections at the
100-hour or annual inspections.
We don’t agree. We selected a 50-hour
inspection interval so we can detect
leaks and replace the cylinder before a
head separation occurs. By removing
leaking cylinder heads discovered with
the periodic 50-hour inspections, the
probability of having an in-flight
separation is greatly reduced. Also, the
50-hour inspection coincides with the
scheduled maintenance for normal
engine oil and filter changes. The costs
of compliance in the NPRM included
costs for the additional cylinder
assembly inspections. We did not
change the AD.
Suggestion To Replace All SAP
Cylinders With Fewer Than 823 Hours
Time-In-Service
One commenter suggests that we
require replacing all SAP cylinders with
fewer than 823 hours TIS. The
commenter states that because of a lack
of engineering data to justify the
proposed corrective action, we should
require removing all the remaining
cylinder assemblies now in service, at
no later than 823 hours TIS.
We don’t agree. The lowest TIS of a
failed cylinder assembly is 823 hours
TIS. Many of the cylinders have
operated well past 823 hours TIS and
some to the time-between-overhaul
limit. The initial 25 hour TIS inspection
and subsequent 50 hour inspections will
provide satisfactory safety oversight to
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 5, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
prevent future head separations without
putting an unnecessary burden on the
public by requiring replacing all 23,000
of the SAP cylinders produced. We did
not change the AD.
Request To Increase the Fuel-Air Ratios
on TCM Engines That Use SAP
Cylinders
One commenter states the corrective
action should be an immediate FAA
authorization to increase the full power
fuel flows above the type certificate
limits as necessary to return the fuel-air
ratios to those of stock TCM engines.
The commenter stated that the SAP
cylinders are not direct replacements for
TCM cylinders because of their
increased volumetric efficiency (more
air without more fuel).
We don’t agree. Superior Air Parts,
Inc. has not made any public claims of
increased horsepower or increased
volumetric efficiency for the cylinders.
Testing during certification of the SAP
cylinders did not reveal any appreciable
power output difference, outside of
normal variation. While it may be due
to a slightly higher volumetric
efficiency, as compared to the original
equipment manufacturer’s (OEM)
cylinders, the observed and resulting
temperature differences were not of
such a magnitude as to cause a safety of
flight issue. The SAP cylinders are
subject to the same FAA-approved
cylinder head temperature limitation as
the OEM cylinders. Both the SAP
cylinders and the OEM cylinders were
certified and approved to operate
continuously at the maximum
certificated temperature. We did not
change the AD.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Observation That a Large Number of
SAP Cylinder Failures Occurred in
Alaska
Six commenters state that a large
number of SAP cylinder assembly
failures occurred in Alaska among
commercial operators that had airplanes
with high-usage rates. They state that
the operators have high-thermal cycles
per hour. The commenters define a
thermal cycle as an engine start, an
aircraft takeoff, an aircraft landing, and
an engine shutdown. One of the
commenters stated that shock heating is
far more destructive than shock cooling.
Another commenter stated that their
facility has installed the affected
investment cast cylinders on hundreds
of aircraft and has operated in an
environment that would be expected to
be as adverse as any other identifiable
operating environment as measured by
three critical engineering parameters:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:20 Aug 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
(1) The average repetitive internal
temperature experienced by the cylinder
head,
(2) The number of thermal cycles, and
(3) The magnitude of the maximum
cylinder head temperature during
exposure to peak thermal cycles.
That commenter goes on to state that
they haven’t encountered any cracks in
this population of SAP cylinders over
the last decade.
We accept these comments as possible
metallurgical explanations for fatigue
cracks starting and growing, however;
other engine operating conditions could
contribute to metal fatigue failures. We
did not change the AD.
Type of Cylinder Head Casting
Questioned
One commenter asks if the cylinder
head casting is a sand casting or an
investment casting. The commenter
states that the AD should specify the
type of casting. The commenter also
asks that the proposed AD should state
that most failures were due to a high
number of thermal cycles for the total
number of engine operating hours. The
commenter states that a thermal cycle
should be defined as ‘‘an engine start
up, airplane takeoff, airplane landing,
and an engine shutdown’’ and not as a
‘‘high ratio of take offs and landings per
flight hour.’’
We partially agree. The proposed AD
does state that the cylinder assemblies
have an investment cast aluminum
head. After additional research, we
agree that a high number of thermal
cycles, for example engine start up,
airplane takeoff, airplane landing, and
engine shutdown can increase the
thermal fatigue of the cylinder
assemblies. However, the number of
engine starts and thermal cycles are not
recorded and cannot be correlated. We
changed the AD for clarity to refer to the
cylinder heads as ‘‘investment cast,’’
and provided a process in paragraph (f)
for determining the cylinder P/N if it is
not in the engine records.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data, including the comments
received, and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described
previously. We have determined that
these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor
increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
8,000 engines installed on airplanes of
U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
will take about 5 work-hours per
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38897
cylinder to perform the actions, and that
the average labor rate is $80 per workhour. Required parts will cost about
$1,150 per cylinder. Based on these
figures, we estimate the total cost of this
AD to U.S. operators to be $12,400,000.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs
to comply with this AD and placed it in
the AD Docket. You may get a copy of
this summary at the address listed
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
■
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
38898
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 5, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
§ 39.13
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
2009–16–03 Superior Air Parts, Inc. (SAP):
Amendment 39–15986. Docket No.
FAA–2007–0051; Directorate Identifier
2007–NE–37–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective September 9, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Teledyne
Continental Motors (TCM) IO–520, TSIO–
520, and IO–550 series reciprocating engines
with SAP investment cast cylinder
assemblies, part numbers (P/Ns) SA52000–
A1, SA52000–A20P, SA52000–A21P,
SA52000–A22P, SA52000–A23P, SA55000–
A1, or SA55000–A20P, installed. These
engines are installed on, but not limited to,
the airplanes listed in Table 1 of this AD.
TABLE 1—TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS-RELATED AIRCRAFT MODELS
Engine model
Aircraft manufacturer
IO–520–A .........................................................................
IO–520–A .........................................................................
IO–520–A .........................................................................
IO–520–A .........................................................................
IO–520–B .........................................................................
IO–520–B .........................................................................
IO–520–B .........................................................................
IO–520–BA .......................................................................
IO–520–BA .......................................................................
IO–520–BA .......................................................................
IO–520–BA .......................................................................
IO–520–BA .......................................................................
IO–520–BA .......................................................................
IO–520–BB .......................................................................
IO–520–BB .......................................................................
IO–520–BB .......................................................................
IO–520–C & CB ...............................................................
IO–520–D .........................................................................
IO–520–D .........................................................................
IO–520–D .........................................................................
IO–520–E .........................................................................
IO–520–E .........................................................................
IO–520–F ..........................................................................
IO–520–F ..........................................................................
IO–520–K .........................................................................
IO–520–L ..........................................................................
IO–520–L ..........................................................................
IO–520–L ..........................................................................
IO–520–M .........................................................................
IO–520–MB ......................................................................
IO–550–A .........................................................................
IO–550–B .........................................................................
IO–550–B .........................................................................
IO–550–C .........................................................................
IO–550–D .........................................................................
IO–550–E .........................................................................
IO–550–F ..........................................................................
IO–550–L ..........................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Rockwell ...........................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Navion ..............................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Navion ..............................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Bellanca ...........................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
(Cessna 310) ...................................................................
(Beech Baron) ..................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Bellanca ...........................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
(Beech Bonanza) .............................................................
Beechcraft ........................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
Cessna .............................................................................
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of cracks
in the area of the exhaust valve and
separation of cylinder heads from the barrels
of SAP cylinder assemblies with certain part
numbers. We are issuing this AD to prevent
the separation of the cylinder head, which
could result in immediate loss of engine
power, possible structural damage to the
engine, and possible fire in the engine
compartment.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:20 Aug 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspecting SAP Cylinder Assemblies
(f) If the engine records don’t contain the
P/N of the cylinder heads, do the following:
(1) Remove the valve cover from the
cylinder assembly.
(2) Look at the cylinder head for the P/N
SAC 52001 I or SAC 55001 I and the word
‘‘AMCAST.’’
(g) For TCM IO–520, TSIO–520, and IO–
550 series reciprocating engines with SAP
investment cast cylinder assemblies, P/Ns
SA52000–A1, SA52000–A20P, SA52000–
A21P, SA52000–A22P, SA52000–A23P,
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Aircraft model designation
210 D, E, F, G, & H.
206.
P206.
200 D.
36 Bonanza.
A36.
Range Master.
A36.
S & V35, V35A, V35B.
C33 A.
E33 A & C.
F33 A & C.
Range Master.
A36.
V35B.
F33 A.
C55–E55 Baron.
17–30 Viking.
A188–300 AG Truck.
185.
Exec 600.
Pres 600.
207.
U206.
17–30A.
210 K, L, M, N & R.
210N II.
210R.
310R.
310R.
310 Conversion.
A36.
Foxstar.
58 Baron.
185/188 Conversion.
310 Conversion.
206/207 Conversion.
210 Conversion.
SA55000–A1, or SA55000–A20P, installed,
with over 750 flight hours (FH) time-inservice (TIS), do the following within 25 FH
TIS after the effective date of this AD:
(1) Inspect each cylinder head around the
exhaust valve side for visual cracks or any
signs of black combustion leakage.
(2) Replace any cracked or leaking
cylinders before further flight.
(3) Perform a standard cylinder
compression test. Guidance on standard
cylinder compression tests can be found in
Teledyne Continental Aircraft Engine Service
Bulletin SB03–3, Differential Pressure Test
and Borescope Inspection Procedures for
Cylinders, dated March 28, 2003.
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 5, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(i) If the cylinder pressure gauge reads
below 60 pounds per-square inch, determine
if the unacceptable pressure is due to a
cracked cylinder.
(ii) To check the cylinder, apply a 2
percent soapy water solution to the side of
the leaking cylinder.
(iii) If you see air bubbles, indicating air
leakage, on the side of the cylinder head, or
near the head-to-cylinder interface, replace
the cylinder assembly before further flight.
(h) Thereafter, repeat the cylinder visual
inspections and compression tests within 50
FH time-since-last inspection (TSLI) until the
cylinders reach their time-between-overhaul
(TBO) limits specified in Teledyne
Continental Aircraft Engine Service
Information Letter SIL98–9A, Revision A,
dated March 28, 2003.
Replacing SAP Cylinder Assemblies
(i) For TCM IO–520, TSIO–520, and IO–
550 series reciprocating engines with SAP
investment cast cylinder assemblies, P/Ns
SA52000–A1, SA52000–A20P, SA52000–
A21P, SA52000–A22P, SA52000–A23P,
SA55000–A1, or SA55000–A20P, replace the
SAP cylinder head assembly at the first TBO
after the effective date of this AD. Engines
that were already overhauled may continue
in service until the first TBO after the
effective date of this AD.
Prohibition Against Installing Certain P/N
SAP Cylinder Assemblies
(j) After the effective date of this AD, do
not install any SAP investment cast cylinder
assembly, P/Ns SA52000–A1, SA52000–
A20P, SA52000–A21P, SA52000–A22P,
SA52000–A23P, SA55000–A1, or SA55000–
A20P, in any engine.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(k) The Manager, Special Certification
Office, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
Special Flight Permits
(l) Under 14 CFR part 39.23, we will not
approve special flight permits for this AD for
engines that have failed the visual inspection
or the 50 hour periodic cylinder assembly
compression test required by this AD.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Related Information
(m) Teledyne Continental Service Bulletin
No. SB03–3 ‘‘Differential Pressure Test and
Borescope Inspection Procedures for
Cylinders’’, dated March 28, 2003.
(n) Contact Peter W. Hakala, Aerospace
Engineer, Special Certification Office, FAA,
Rotorcraft Directorate, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Fort Worth, TX 76137; e-mail:
peter.w.hakala@faa.gov; telephone (817)
222–5145; fax (817) 222–5785, for more
information about this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(o) You must use Teledyne Continental
Aircraft Engine Service Information Letter
SIL98–9A, Revision A, dated March 28, 2003
to determine the times-between-overhaul
required by this AD. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation
by reference of this service information in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:20 Aug 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Contact Teledyne Continental
Motors, Inc., P.O. Box 90, Mobile, Alabama;
telephone (251) 438–3411, or go to: https://
www.genuinecontinental.aero, for a copy of
this service information. You may review
copies at the FAA, New England Region, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA; or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
July 23, 2009.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–18220 Filed 8–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0168; Directorate
Identifier 2007–SW–33–AD; Amendment 39–
15977; AD 2009–15–14]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta
S.p.A. Model AB139 and AW139
Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
specified Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model
AB139 and AW139 helicopters. This AD
results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The aviation authority of Italy,
with which we have a bilateral
agreement, states in the MCAI that
during the installation of a fire
extinguisher bottle on a new helicopter,
it was found that the electrical
receptacle/connectors on the bottle
which commands the firing of the
extinguishing agent were swapped
between engines No. 1 and No. 2. This
condition could affect helicopters
already in service and fire extinguisher
bottles of the same part number in stock
as spare parts. If not corrected, an
improperly wired fire extinguishing
bottle might cause the extinguishing
agent to be discharged toward the
unselected engine when the system is
activated, rather than toward the engine
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38899
with the fire. This AD requires
determining if each engine has the
proper outlet end on the electrical
receptacle/connector that attaches the
firing cartridge to the fire extinguisher
bottle, and if not, replacing the fire
extinguisher bottle. This AD is intended
to prevent the fire extinguishing agent
from not discharging toward the engine
with the fire, which could result in loss
of the helicopter due to an engine fire.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on
September 9, 2009.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of
September 9, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
regulations.gov or in person at the
Docket Operations office, U.S.
Department of Transportation, M–30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m. Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this AD from Agusta, Via
Giovanni Agusta, 520 21017 Cascina
Costa di Samarate (VA), Italy, telephone
39 0331–229111, fax 39 0331–229605/
222595, or at https://
customersupport.agusta.com/
technical_advice.php.
Examining The AD Docket: The AD
docket contains the Notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM), the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address
and operating hours for the Docket
Operations office (telephone (800) 647–
5527) are in the ADDRESSES section of
this AD. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after they are
received.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Strasburger, Aviation Safety Engineer
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations
and Policy Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone
(817) 222–5167; fax (817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to Agusta Model AB139 and
AW139 helicopters on February 19,
2009. That NPRM was published in the
Federal Register on March 9, 2009 (74
FR 9971). That NPRM proposed to
require determining if each engine has
the proper outlet end on the electrical
receptacle/connector that attaches the
firing cartridge to the fire extinguisher
bottle, and if not, replacing the fire
extinguisher bottle. The proposed AD
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38896-38899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18220]
[[Page 38896]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-0051; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-37-AD;
Amendment 39-15986; AD 2009-16-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) IO-
520, TSIO-520, and IO-550 Series Reciprocating Engines With Superior
Air Parts, Inc. (SAP) Cylinder Assemblies Installed
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain TCM IO-520, TSIO-520, and IO-550 series reciprocating engines,
with certain SAP investment cast cylinder assemblies installed. This AD
requires initial and repetitive inspections and compression tests to
detect cracks in those cylinders with more than 750 flight hours (FH)
time-in-service (TIS). This AD results from reports of cracks in the
area of the exhaust valve and separation of cylinder heads from the
barrels of SAP cylinder assemblies with certain part numbers. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the separation of the cylinder head, which
could result in immediate loss of engine power, possible structural
damage to the engine, and possible fire in the engine compartment.
DATES: This AD becomes effective September 9, 2009. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulations as of September 9, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You can get the service information identified in this AD
from Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc., P.O. Box 90, Mobile, Alabama;
telephone (251) 438-3411, or go to: https://www.genuinecontinental.aero.
The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter W. Hakala, Aerospace Engineer,
Special Certification Office, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; e-mail: peter.w.hakala@faa.gov; telephone
(817) 222-5145; fax (817) 222-5785.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39
with a proposed AD. The proposed AD applies to certain TCM IO-520,
TSIO-520, and IO-550 reciprocating engines with SAP investment cast
cylinder assemblies, part numbers (P/Ns) SA52000-A1, SA52000-A20P,
SA52000-A21P, SA52000-A22P, SA52000-A23P, SA55000-A1, or SA55000-A20P,
installed. We published the proposed AD in the Federal Register on
April 11, 2008, (73 FR 19772). That action proposed to require initial
and repetitive inspections and compression tests to detect cracks in
those cylinders with more than 750 FH TIS.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments received.
Requests to Not Issue an AD Against the SAP Cylinders
Four commenters suggest we not issue an AD against the SAP
cylinders because the SAP cylinder assemblies have a lower failure rate
than the OEM cylinder assemblies. One commenter suggests that SAP
should issue a detailed service bulletin to address the service
difficulty conditions.
We don't agree. We confirmed that nine SAP cylinder assemblies
failed with a head separation condition, which could result in loss of
control of the airplane. Superior Air Parts, Inc. investigated the
cause for the failure of the cylinder assemblies. Because the cylinder
assemblies failed with a separation condition from propagation of metal
fatigue cracks, we determined that this failure condition is a direct
safety hazard to the airplane. This proposed AD is necessary to ensure
that these cylinder assemblies are periodically inspected, and removed
from service at engine overhaul to prevent this unsafe condition. We
did not change the AD.
Absence of Data To Show Serial Number Distribution
One commenter suggests we examine the distribution of the cracks
across the range of serial numbers and perform a statistical analysis
to try to identify a process change or a design change that may be a
contributor to the failed SAP cylinder assemblies.
We agree. We examined the distribution of the cracks, and collected
and analyzed in service data of the cylinder assemblies. We found the
failed cylinder assemblies were not in any specific serial number
sequence. The failed serial numbers ranged from low to high within the
serial number range, so the time to failure of the cylinder assemblies
were unpredictable. We did not change the AD.
Requests To Change 50-Hour Inspections to 100-Hour or Annual
Inspections
Twenty commenters suggest that requiring a 50-hour repetitive
inspection for cylinder leaks is unnecessary and burdensome at 50-hour
intervals. The commenters suggest that we change the repetitive
inspection requirements to allow performing the inspections at the 100-
hour or annual inspections.
We don't agree. We selected a 50-hour inspection interval so we can
detect leaks and replace the cylinder before a head separation occurs.
By removing leaking cylinder heads discovered with the periodic 50-hour
inspections, the probability of having an in-flight separation is
greatly reduced. Also, the 50-hour inspection coincides with the
scheduled maintenance for normal engine oil and filter changes. The
costs of compliance in the NPRM included costs for the additional
cylinder assembly inspections. We did not change the AD.
Suggestion To Replace All SAP Cylinders With Fewer Than 823 Hours Time-
In-Service
One commenter suggests that we require replacing all SAP cylinders
with fewer than 823 hours TIS. The commenter states that because of a
lack of engineering data to justify the proposed corrective action, we
should require removing all the remaining cylinder assemblies now in
service, at no later than 823 hours TIS.
We don't agree. The lowest TIS of a failed cylinder assembly is 823
hours TIS. Many of the cylinders have operated well past 823 hours TIS
and some to the time-between-overhaul limit. The initial 25 hour TIS
inspection and subsequent 50 hour inspections will provide satisfactory
safety oversight to
[[Page 38897]]
prevent future head separations without putting an unnecessary burden
on the public by requiring replacing all 23,000 of the SAP cylinders
produced. We did not change the AD.
Request To Increase the Fuel-Air Ratios on TCM Engines That Use SAP
Cylinders
One commenter states the corrective action should be an immediate
FAA authorization to increase the full power fuel flows above the type
certificate limits as necessary to return the fuel-air ratios to those
of stock TCM engines. The commenter stated that the SAP cylinders are
not direct replacements for TCM cylinders because of their increased
volumetric efficiency (more air without more fuel).
We don't agree. Superior Air Parts, Inc. has not made any public
claims of increased horsepower or increased volumetric efficiency for
the cylinders. Testing during certification of the SAP cylinders did
not reveal any appreciable power output difference, outside of normal
variation. While it may be due to a slightly higher volumetric
efficiency, as compared to the original equipment manufacturer's (OEM)
cylinders, the observed and resulting temperature differences were not
of such a magnitude as to cause a safety of flight issue. The SAP
cylinders are subject to the same FAA-approved cylinder head
temperature limitation as the OEM cylinders. Both the SAP cylinders and
the OEM cylinders were certified and approved to operate continuously
at the maximum certificated temperature. We did not change the AD.
Observation That a Large Number of SAP Cylinder Failures Occurred in
Alaska
Six commenters state that a large number of SAP cylinder assembly
failures occurred in Alaska among commercial operators that had
airplanes with high-usage rates. They state that the operators have
high-thermal cycles per hour. The commenters define a thermal cycle as
an engine start, an aircraft takeoff, an aircraft landing, and an
engine shutdown. One of the commenters stated that shock heating is far
more destructive than shock cooling. Another commenter stated that
their facility has installed the affected investment cast cylinders on
hundreds of aircraft and has operated in an environment that would be
expected to be as adverse as any other identifiable operating
environment as measured by three critical engineering parameters:
(1) The average repetitive internal temperature experienced by the
cylinder head,
(2) The number of thermal cycles, and
(3) The magnitude of the maximum cylinder head temperature during
exposure to peak thermal cycles.
That commenter goes on to state that they haven't encountered any
cracks in this population of SAP cylinders over the last decade.
We accept these comments as possible metallurgical explanations for
fatigue cracks starting and growing, however; other engine operating
conditions could contribute to metal fatigue failures. We did not
change the AD.
Type of Cylinder Head Casting Questioned
One commenter asks if the cylinder head casting is a sand casting
or an investment casting. The commenter states that the AD should
specify the type of casting. The commenter also asks that the proposed
AD should state that most failures were due to a high number of thermal
cycles for the total number of engine operating hours. The commenter
states that a thermal cycle should be defined as ``an engine start up,
airplane takeoff, airplane landing, and an engine shutdown'' and not as
a ``high ratio of take offs and landings per flight hour.''
We partially agree. The proposed AD does state that the cylinder
assemblies have an investment cast aluminum head. After additional
research, we agree that a high number of thermal cycles, for example
engine start up, airplane takeoff, airplane landing, and engine
shutdown can increase the thermal fatigue of the cylinder assemblies.
However, the number of engine starts and thermal cycles are not
recorded and cannot be correlated. We changed the AD for clarity to
refer to the cylinder heads as ``investment cast,'' and provided a
process in paragraph (f) for determining the cylinder P/N if it is not
in the engine records.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 8,000 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about 5
work-hours per cylinder to perform the actions, and that the average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $1,150
per cylinder. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of
this AD to U.S. operators to be $12,400,000.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and
placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
[[Page 38898]]
the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2009-16-03 Superior Air Parts, Inc. (SAP): Amendment 39-15986.
Docket No. FAA-2007-0051; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-37-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective
September 9, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) IO-520,
TSIO-520, and IO-550 series reciprocating engines with SAP
investment cast cylinder assemblies, part numbers (P/Ns) SA52000-A1,
SA52000-A20P, SA52000-A21P, SA52000-A22P, SA52000-A23P, SA55000-A1,
or SA55000-A20P, installed. These engines are installed on, but not
limited to, the airplanes listed in Table 1 of this AD.
Table 1--Teledyne Continental Motors-Related Aircraft Models
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engine model Aircraft manufacturer Aircraft model designation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IO-520-A............................... Cessna.................... 210 D, E, F, G, & H.
IO-520-A............................... Cessna.................... 206.
IO-520-A............................... Cessna.................... P206.
IO-520-A............................... Rockwell.................. 200 D.
IO-520-B............................... Beechcraft................ 36 Bonanza.
IO-520-B............................... Beechcraft................ A36.
IO-520-B............................... Navion.................... Range Master.
IO-520-BA.............................. Beechcraft................ A36.
IO-520-BA.............................. Beechcraft................ S & V35, V35A, V35B.
IO-520-BA.............................. Beechcraft................ C33 A.
IO-520-BA.............................. Beechcraft................ E33 A & C.
IO-520-BA.............................. Beechcraft................ F33 A & C.
IO-520-BA.............................. Navion.................... Range Master.
IO-520-BB.............................. Beechcraft................ A36.
IO-520-BB.............................. Beechcraft................ V35B.
IO-520-BB.............................. Beechcraft................ F33 A.
IO-520-C & CB.......................... Beechcraft................ C55-E55 Baron.
IO-520-D............................... Bellanca.................. 17-30 Viking.
IO-520-D............................... Cessna.................... A188-300 AG Truck.
IO-520-D............................... Cessna.................... 185.
IO-520-E............................... (Cessna 310).............. Exec 600.
IO-520-E............................... (Beech Baron)............. Pres 600.
IO-520-F............................... Cessna.................... 207.
IO-520-F............................... Cessna.................... U206.
IO-520-K............................... Bellanca.................. 17-30A.
IO-520-L............................... Cessna.................... 210 K, L, M, N & R.
IO-520-L............................... Cessna.................... 210N II.
IO-520-L............................... Cessna.................... 210R.
IO-520-M............................... Cessna.................... 310R.
IO-520-MB.............................. Cessna.................... 310R.
IO-550-A............................... Cessna.................... 310 Conversion.
IO-550-B............................... Beechcraft................ A36.
IO-550-B............................... (Beech Bonanza)........... Foxstar.
IO-550-C............................... Beechcraft................ 58 Baron.
IO-550-D............................... Cessna.................... 185/188 Conversion.
IO-550-E............................... Cessna.................... 310 Conversion.
IO-550-F............................... Cessna.................... 206/207 Conversion.
IO-550-L............................... Cessna.................... 210 Conversion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of cracks in the area of the
exhaust valve and separation of cylinder heads from the barrels of
SAP cylinder assemblies with certain part numbers. We are issuing
this AD to prevent the separation of the cylinder head, which could
result in immediate loss of engine power, possible structural damage
to the engine, and possible fire in the engine compartment.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspecting SAP Cylinder Assemblies
(f) If the engine records don't contain the P/N of the cylinder
heads, do the following:
(1) Remove the valve cover from the cylinder assembly.
(2) Look at the cylinder head for the P/N SAC 52001 I or SAC
55001 I and the word ``AMCAST.''
(g) For TCM IO-520, TSIO-520, and IO-550 series reciprocating
engines with SAP investment cast cylinder assemblies, P/Ns SA52000-
A1, SA52000-A20P, SA52000-A21P, SA52000-A22P, SA52000-A23P, SA55000-
A1, or SA55000-A20P, installed, with over 750 flight hours (FH)
time-in-service (TIS), do the following within 25 FH TIS after the
effective date of this AD:
(1) Inspect each cylinder head around the exhaust valve side for
visual cracks or any signs of black combustion leakage.
(2) Replace any cracked or leaking cylinders before further
flight.
(3) Perform a standard cylinder compression test. Guidance on
standard cylinder compression tests can be found in Teledyne
Continental Aircraft Engine Service Bulletin SB03-3, Differential
Pressure Test and Borescope Inspection Procedures for Cylinders,
dated March 28, 2003.
[[Page 38899]]
(i) If the cylinder pressure gauge reads below 60 pounds per-
square inch, determine if the unacceptable pressure is due to a
cracked cylinder.
(ii) To check the cylinder, apply a 2 percent soapy water
solution to the side of the leaking cylinder.
(iii) If you see air bubbles, indicating air leakage, on the
side of the cylinder head, or near the head-to-cylinder interface,
replace the cylinder assembly before further flight.
(h) Thereafter, repeat the cylinder visual inspections and
compression tests within 50 FH time-since-last inspection (TSLI)
until the cylinders reach their time-between-overhaul (TBO) limits
specified in Teledyne Continental Aircraft Engine Service
Information Letter SIL98-9A, Revision A, dated March 28, 2003.
Replacing SAP Cylinder Assemblies
(i) For TCM IO-520, TSIO-520, and IO-550 series reciprocating
engines with SAP investment cast cylinder assemblies, P/Ns SA52000-
A1, SA52000-A20P, SA52000-A21P, SA52000-A22P, SA52000-A23P, SA55000-
A1, or SA55000-A20P, replace the SAP cylinder head assembly at the
first TBO after the effective date of this AD. Engines that were
already overhauled may continue in service until the first TBO after
the effective date of this AD.
Prohibition Against Installing Certain P/N SAP Cylinder Assemblies
(j) After the effective date of this AD, do not install any SAP
investment cast cylinder assembly, P/Ns SA52000-A1, SA52000-A20P,
SA52000-A21P, SA52000-A22P, SA52000-A23P, SA55000-A1, or SA55000-
A20P, in any engine.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(k) The Manager, Special Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Special Flight Permits
(l) Under 14 CFR part 39.23, we will not approve special flight
permits for this AD for engines that have failed the visual
inspection or the 50 hour periodic cylinder assembly compression
test required by this AD.
Related Information
(m) Teledyne Continental Service Bulletin No. SB03-3
``Differential Pressure Test and Borescope Inspection Procedures for
Cylinders'', dated March 28, 2003.
(n) Contact Peter W. Hakala, Aerospace Engineer, Special
Certification Office, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; e-mail: peter.w.hakala@faa.gov;
telephone (817) 222-5145; fax (817) 222-5785, for more information
about this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(o) You must use Teledyne Continental Aircraft Engine Service
Information Letter SIL98-9A, Revision A, dated March 28, 2003 to
determine the times-between-overhaul required by this AD. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of this service information in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc.,
P.O. Box 90, Mobile, Alabama; telephone (251) 438-3411, or go to:
https://www.genuinecontinental.aero, for a copy of this service
information. You may review copies at the FAA, New England Region,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on July 23, 2009.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-18220 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P