Dollar General Corporation, Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order, 38415-38417 [E9-18508]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 147 / Monday, August 3, 2009 / Notices
for sale, distributed in commerce, or
imported into the United States, or caused
one or more of such acts, with respect to the
aforesaid banned hazardous Baskets, Eggs
and Tops, in violation of section 19(a)(1) of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(1). Hobby Lobby
committed these prohibited acts
‘‘knowingly,’’ as that term is defined in
section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069(d).
15. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2069, Hobby Lobby is subject to civil
penalties for the aforementioned violations.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Hobby Lobby’s Responsive Allegations
16. Hobby Lobby denies the Staff’s
allegations set forth above that Hobby Lobby
knowingly violated the CPSA or that it failed
to take adequate action to ensure that none
of the products contained lead containing
paint.
Agreement of the Parties
17. Under the CPSA, the Commission has
jurisdiction over this matter and over Hobby
Lobby.
18. The parties enter into the Agreement
for settlement purposes only. The Agreement
does not constitute an admission by Hobby
Lobby, or a determination by the
Commission, that Hobby Lobby has
knowingly violated the CPSA.
19. In settlement of the Staff’s allegations,
Hobby Lobby shall pay a civil penalty in the
amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00)
within twenty (20) calendar days of service
of the Commission’s final Order accepting
the Agreement. This payment shall be made
by check payable to the order of the United
States Treasury.
20. Upon the Commission’s provisional
acceptance of the Agreement, the Agreement
shall be placed in the public record and
published in the Federal Register in
accordance with the procedures set forth in
16 CFR 1118.20(e). In accordance with 16
CFR 1118.20(f), if the Commission does not
receive any written request not to accept the
Agreement within fifteen (15) days, the
Agreement shall be deemed finally accepted
on the sixteenth (16th) day after the date it
is published in the Federal Register.
21. Upon the Commission’s final
acceptance of the Agreement and issuance of
the final Order, Hobby Lobby knowingly,
voluntarily, and completely waives any
rights it may have in this matter to the
following: (1) An administrative or judicial
hearing; (2) judicial review or other challenge
or contest of the validity of the Commission’s
Order or actions; (3) a determination by the
Commission of whether Hobby Lobby failed
to comply with the CPSA and its underlying
regulations; (4) a statement of findings of fact
and conclusions of law; and (5) any claims
under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
22. The Commission may publicize the
terms of the Agreement and Order.
23. The Agreement and Order shall apply
to, and be binding upon, Hobby Lobby and
each of its successors and assigns.
24. The Commission issues the Order
under the provisions of the CPSA, and
violation of the Order may subject Hobby
Lobby and those designated in paragraph 23
above to appropriate legal action.
25. The Agreement may be used in
interpreting the Order. Understandings,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jul 31, 2009
Jkt 217001
agreements, representations, or
interpretations apart from those contained in
the Agreement and Order may not be used to
vary or contradict its terms. The Agreement
shall not be waived, amended, modified, or
otherwise altered, except in a writing that is
executed by the party against whom such
waiver, amendment, modification, or
alteration is sought to be enforced.
26. If any provision of the Agreement and
Order is held to be illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable under present or future laws
effective during the terms of the Agreement
and Order, such provision shall be fully
severable. The balance of the Agreement and
Order shall remain in full force and effect,
unless the Commission and Hobby Lobby
agree that severing the provision materially
affects the purpose of the Agreement and
Order.
Dated: March 3, 2009.
Steve Green,
President, Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 7707
SW. 44th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73179.
Dated: March 3, 2009.
Peter M. Dobelbower,
Vice President & General Counsel, Hobby
Lobby Stores, Inc. U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission Staff.
Cheryl A. Falvey,
General Counsel, Office of the General
Counsel.
Ronald G. Yelenik,
Assistant General Counsel, Office of the
General Counsel.
Dated: March 6, 2009.
M. Reza Malihi,
Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance,
Office of the General Counsel.
Order
Upon consideration of the Settlement
Agreement entered into between Hobby
Lobby Stores, Inc. (‘‘Hobby Lobby’’) and the
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) staff, and the Commission
having jurisdiction over the subject matter
and over Hobby Lobby, and it appearing that
the Settlement Agreement and Order are in
the public interest, it is
ORDERED, that the Settlement Agreement
be, and hereby is, accepted; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, that Hobby Lobby
shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of
fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) within
twenty (20) calendar days of service of the
Commission’s final Order accepting the
Agreement. The payment shall be made by
check payable to the order of the United
States Treasury. Upon the failure of Hobby
Lobby to make any of the foregoing payments
when due, interest on the unpaid amount
shall accrue and be paid by Hobby Lobby at
the Federal legal rate of interest set forth at
28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b).
Provisionally accepted and provisional
Order issued on the 8th day of July, 2009.
By Order of the Commission.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–18516 Filed 7–31–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38415
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 09–C0029]
Dollar General Corporation,
Provisional Acceptance of a
Settlement Agreement and Order
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the
Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the
Consumer Product Safety Act in the
Federal Register in accordance with the
terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published
below is a provisionally-accepted
Settlement Agreement with Dollar
General Corporation, containing a civil
penalty of $100,000.00.
DATES: Any interested person may ask
the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its
contents by filing a written request with
the Office of the Secretary by August 18,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to
comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the
Comment 09–C0029, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Room 502, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–
4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neal
S. Cohen, Trial Attorney, Division of
Compliance, Office of the General
Counsel, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408;
telephone (301) 504–7504 or M. Reza
Malihi, Trial Attorney, (same address);
telephone (301) 504–7733.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the Agreement and Order appears
below.
Dated: July 28, 2009.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
In the Matter of Dollar General Corporation;
Settlement Agreement
1. In accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20,
Dollar General Corporation (‘‘DGC’’), for itself
and on behalf of its wholly owned
subsidiaries referenced in paragraph three
(collectively referred to as ‘‘Dollar General’’),
and the staff (‘‘Staff’’) of the United States
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(‘‘CPSC’’ or the ‘‘Commission’’) enter into
this Settlement Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’).
The Agreement and the incorporated
attached Order (‘‘Order’’) settle the Staff’s
allegations set forth below.
Parties
2. The Commission is an independent
federal regulatory agency established
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
38416
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 147 / Monday, August 3, 2009 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
pursuant to, and responsible for the
enforcement of, the Consumer Product Safety
Act, 15 U.S.C. 2051–2089 (‘‘CPSA’’).
3. DGC is a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of Tennessee, with its
principal offices located in Goodlettsville,
Tennessee. At all times relevant hereto, the
following wholly owned subsidiaries of DGC
had principal offices located in
Goodlettsville, Tennessee. Dollar General
Merchandising, Inc. (‘‘DGMI’’), a corporation,
and DG Retail, LLC, a limited liability
company, were entities organized and
existing under the laws of Tennessee.
Dolgencorp, Inc. (‘‘Dolgencorp,’’) Dolgencorp
of Texas, Inc., and Dolgencorp of New York,
Inc. were corporations, and Dollar General
Partners was a partnership, organized and
existing under the laws of Kentucky. (DG
Retail LLC, Dolgencorp, Dolgencorp of Texas,
Inc., Dolgencorp of New York, Inc., and
Dollar General Partners, are collectively
referred to as the ‘‘Retail Subsidiaries.’’) At
all times relevant hereto, Dollar General
imported and/or sold toys and other
children’s products, among other general
merchandise.
Staff Allegations
4. During September 2007, DGMI imported
into the United States about 63,000 units of
green, plastic Frankenstein head-shaped
Tumblers (‘‘Tumbler(s)’’). The Tumblers
were, in turn, offered for sale or sold to
consumers at retail stores nationwide owned
or operated by DGC or one of its Retail
Subsidiaries in September 2007 for about $1
per unit.
5. Between April 2007 and July 2007,
DGMI imported about 380,000 Pull-Back
Action Toy Cars, comprising two styles that
included a four pack of ‘‘Super Wheels’’
(UPC #400016576344) and a two pack of
‘‘Super Racer’’ cars (UPC #883788965002)
(‘‘Toy Car(s)’’). The Toy Cars were, in turn,
offered for sale or sold to consumers at retail
stores nationwide owned or operated by DGC
or one of its Retail Subsidiaries from April
2007 through October 2007 for about $1 per
pack.
6. Between March 2005 and October 2007,
Dolgencorp imported about 51,000 Children’s
Sunglasses, yellow in color, with the word
‘‘CHINA’’ printed on the left side of the
frame, and the UPC #400007860896 and
words ‘‘Fashion Sunglasses’’ and ‘‘Time to
Play Every Day’’ printed on the product’s red
hangtag (‘‘Sunglasses’’). The Sunglasses
were, in turn, offered for sale or sold to
consumers at retail stores nationwide owned
or operated by DGC or one of its Retail
Subsidiaries from March 2005 through
October 2007 for about $1 per unit.
7. The Tumblers, Toy Cars and Sunglasses
are ‘‘consumer product(s),’’ and, at all times
relevant hereto, Dollar General was a
‘‘manufacturer’’ and/or a ‘‘retailer’’ of those
consumer product(s), which were
‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as those terms
are defined in CPSA sections 3(a)(3), (5), (8),
(11), and (13), 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(3), (5), (8),
(11), and (13).
8. The Tumblers, Toy Cars and Sunglasses
are articles intended to be entrusted to or for
use by children, and, therefore, are subject to
the requirements of the Commission’s Ban of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jul 31, 2009
Jkt 217001
Lead-Containing Paint and Certain Consumer
Products Bearing Lead-Containing Paint, 16
CFR Part 1303 (the ‘‘Ban’’). Under the Ban,
toys and other children’s articles must not
bear ‘‘lead-containing paint,’’ defined as
paint or other surface coating materials
whose lead content is more than 0.06 percent
of the weight of the total nonvolatile content
of the paint or the weight of the dried paint
film. 16 CFR 1303.2(b)(1)
9. On September 28, 2007, the Staff
obtained from the University of Ashland’s
Department of Chemistry laboratory results
relating to, in pertinent part, testing for the
presence of lead in surface paints on samples
of the Tumblers collected from a DGC retail
store in Ashland, Ohio. The University’s test
results demonstrated that paint from the
center of the eye on certain Tumbler samples
contained a total lead content in excess of the
permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in the
Ban.
10. On October 12, 2007, Dollar General
reported to CPSC that it had commissioned
an independent laboratory to conduct
validation testing for the presence of lead in
surface coatings on a sample of the
Sunglasses. As expressed in a test report of
the same date, the test results demonstrated
that the yellow surface coating and gold
surface coating (printing on sample)
contained a total lead content in excess of the
permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in the
Ban.
11. On November 6, 2007, Dollar General
reported to CPSC that it had commissioned
an independent laboratory to conduct testing
for the presence of lead in surface coatings
on multiple samples of the Toy Cars. As
expressed in two test reports dated November
5, 2007, the test results demonstrated that
samples of the ‘‘4-pack’’ and ‘‘2-pack’’ Toy
Cars contained a total lead content in excess
of the permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth
in the Ban.
12. On October 4, 2007, the Commission
and DGMI announced a consumer-level
recall of about 63,000 units of the Tumblers
because ‘‘Surface paint on the center of the
eyes of some of the cups can contain high
levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint
standard.’’ On November 7, 2007, the
Commission and DGMI announced a recall of
about 380,000 units of the Toy Cars because
‘‘Surface paint on the cars contains excessive
levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint
standard.’’ On the next day, November 8,
2007, the Commission and Dolgencorp
likewise announced a recall of about 51,000
units of the Sunglasses because ‘‘The yellow
surface paint on the sunglasses may contain
excessive levels of lead, violating the federal
lead paint standard.’’
13. Although Dollar General reported no
incidents or injuries associated with the
Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars, it failed
to take adequate action to ensure that none
would bear or contain lead-containing paint,
thereby creating a risk of lead poisoning and
adverse health effects to children.
14. The Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars
constitute ‘‘banned hazardous products’’
under CPSA section 8 and the Ban, 15 U.S.C.
2057 and 16 CFR 1303.1(a)(1), 1303.4(b), in
that they bear or contain paint or other
surface coating materials whose lead content
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
exceeds the permissible limit of 0.06 percent
of the weight of the total nonvolatile content
of the paint or the weight of the dried paint
film.
15. Between March 2005 and October 2007,
Dollar General sold, manufactured for sale,
offered for sale, distributed in commerce, or
imported into the United States, or caused
one or more of such acts, with respect to the
aforesaid banned hazardous Tumblers,
Sunglasses and Toy Cars, in violation of
section 19(a)(1) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2068(a)(1). Dollar General committed these
prohibited acts ‘‘knowingly,’’ as that term is
defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2069(d).
16. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2069, Dollar General is subject to civil
penalties for the aforementioned violations.
Dollar General’s Responsive Allegations
17. Dollar General denies that it knowingly
violated the CPSA.
18. Dollar General states that the vendors
of the Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars
each represented and warranted to Dollar
General that the products furnished by the
applicable vendor complied with all
applicable laws, regulations and standards.
Additionally, prior to importing the
Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars, Dollar
General had the products tested by a
qualified independent third party laboratory
for all applicable safety standards, including,
without limitation, lead paint standards. The
tests indicated that the products were fully
compliant.
19. Thus, Dollar General neither knew, nor
should have known, of any potential
problems with these products. However, as a
result of industry changes and in an
abundance of caution, Dollar General
voluntarily commenced validation re-testing
of toys to confirm initial test results. Dollar
General tested hundreds of samples and, of
those, discovered that two, the Sunglasses
and Toy Cars, did not meet applicable
standards. Dollar General notified the CPSC
of the results and promptly initiated a
voluntary recall of the items.
Agreement of the Parties
20. Under the CPSA, the Commission has
jurisdiction over this matter and over Dollar
General.
21. The parties enter into the Agreement
for settlement purposes only. The Agreement
does not constitute an admission by Dollar
General, or a determination by the
Commission, that Dollar General has
knowingly violated the CPSA.
22. In settlement of the Staff’s allegations,
DGC shall pay, on behalf of Dollar General,
a civil penalty in the amount of one hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000.00) within twenty
(20) calendar days of service of the
Commission’s final Order accepting the
Agreement. This payment shall be made by
check payable to the order of the United
States Treasury.
23. Upon the Commission’s provisional
acceptance of the Agreement, the Agreement
shall be placed on the public record and
published in the Federal Register in
accordance with the procedures set forth in
16 CFR 1118.20(e). In accordance with 16
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 147 / Monday, August 3, 2009 / Notices
CFR 1118.20(f), if the Commission does not
receive any written request not to accept the
Agreement within fifteen (15) days, the
Agreement shall be deemed finally accepted
on the sixteenth (16th) day after the date it
is published in the Federal Register.
24. Upon the Commission’s final
acceptance of the Agreement and issuance of
the final Order, Dollar General knowingly,
voluntarily, and completely waives any
rights it may have in this matter to the
following: (1) An administrative or judicial
hearing; (2) judicial review or other challenge
or contest of the validity of the Commission’s
Order or actions; (3) a determination by the
Commission of whether Dollar General failed
to comply with the CPSA and its underlying
regulations; (4) a statement of findings of fact
and conclusions of law; and (5) any claims
under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
25. The Commission may publicize the
terms of the Agreement and Order.
26. The Agreement and Order shall apply
to, and be binding upon, Dollar General and
each of its successors and assigns.
27. The Commission issues the Order
under the provisions of the CPSA, and
violation of the Order may subject those
referenced in paragraph 26 above to
appropriate legal action.
28. The Agreement may be used in
interpreting the Order. Understandings,
agreements, representations, or
interpretations apart from those contained in
the Agreement and Order may not be used to
vary or contradict its terms. The Agreement
shall not be waived, amended, modified, or
otherwise altered, without written agreement
thereto executed by the party against whom
such waiver, amendment, modification, or
alteration is sought to be enforced.
29. If any provision of the Agreement and
Order is held to be illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable under present or future laws
effective during the terms of the Agreement
and Order, such provision shall be fully
severable. The balance of the Agreement and
Order shall remain in full force and effect,
unless the Commission and Dollar General
agree that severing the provision materially
affects the purpose of the Agreement and
Order.
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION
Dated: June 24, 2009.
By: lllllllllllllllllll
Susan S. Lanigan,
Executive Vice President and General
Counsel, Dollar General Corporation, 100
Mission Ridge, Goodlettsville, TN 37072.
Dated: June 24, 2009. lllllllllll
By: lllllllllllllllllll
Robert R. Stephenson,
Deputy General Counsel,
Dollar General Corporation.
U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION STAFF
Cheryl A. Falvey,
General Counsel, Office of the General
Counsel.
Ronald G. Yelenik,
Assistant General Counsel, Office of the
General Counsel.
Dated: June 25, 2009. lllllllllll
By: lllllllllllllllllll
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jul 31, 2009
Jkt 217001
Neal S. Cohen,
Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance,
Office of the General Counsel.
By: lllllllllllllllllll
M. Reza Malihi,
Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance,
Office of the General Counsel.
In the Matter of Dollar General Corporation;
Order
Upon consideration of the Settlement
Agreement entered into between Dollar
General Corporation (‘‘DGC’’), for itself and
on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiaries,
Dollar General Merchandising, Inc., DG
Retail, LLC, Dolgencorp, Inc., Dolgencorp of
Texas, Inc., Dolgencorp of New York, Inc.,
and Dollar General Partners (collectively
referred to as ‘‘Dollar General’’), and the U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) staff, and the Commission
having jurisdiction over the subject matter
and over Dollar General, and it appearing
that the Settlement Agreement and Order are
in the public interest, it is
Ordered, that the Settlement Agreement be,
and hereby is, accepted; and it is
Further ordered, that DGC shall pay, on
behalf of Dollar General, a civil penalty in the
amount of one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000.00) within twenty (20) calendar
days of service of the Commission’s final
Order accepting the Agreement. The payment
shall be made by check payable to the order
of the United States Treasury.
Upon the failure of DGC to make any of the
foregoing payments when due, interest on the
unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid by
DGC at the federal legal rate of interest set
forth at 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b).
Provisionally accepted and provisional
Order issued on the 8th day of July 2009.
BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION:
lllllllllllllllllllll
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–18508 Filed 7–31–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 09–C0030]
Haier America Trading, LLC,
Provisional Acceptance of a
Settlement Agreement and Order
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the
Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the
Consumer Product Safety Act in the
Federal Register in accordance with the
terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published
below is a provisionally accepted
Settlement Agreement with Haier
America Trading, LLC, containing a
civil penalty of $587,500.00.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38417
DATES: Any interested person may ask
the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its
contents by filing a written request with
the Office of the Secretary by August 18,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to
comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the
Comment 09–C0030, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Room 502, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–
4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seth
B. Popkin, Lead Trial Attorney, Division
of Compliance, Office of the General
Counsel, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408;
telephone (301) 504–7612.
The text of
the Agreement and Order appears
below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: July 29, 2009.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
United States of America—Consumer
Product Safety Commission
In the Matter of Haier America Trading,
LLC, CPSC Docket No. 09–C0030.
Settlement Agreement
1. In accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20,
Haier America Trading, LLC (‘‘Haier
America’’) and the staff (‘‘Staff’’) of the
United States Consumer Product Safety
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) enter into this
Settlement Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’). The
Agreement and the incorporated attached
Order (‘‘Order’’) settle the Staff’s allegations
set forth below.
Parties
2. The Commission is an independent
Federal regulatory agency established
pursuant to, and responsible for the
enforcement of, the Consumer Product Safety
Act, 15 U.S.C. 2051–2089 (‘‘CPSA’’).
3. Haier America is a limited liability
company organized and existing under the
laws of New York, with its principal offices
located in New York, New York. At all times
relevant hereto, Haier America sold
appliances.
Staff Allegations
4. From on or about January to July 2004,
Haier America distributed in commerce,
including through importation and sale to
retailers, multiple units of the Haier America
Oscillating Tower Fan model FTM140GG
(‘‘Fan’’).
5. The Fans are ‘‘consumer product[s],’’
and, at all times relevant hereto, Haier
America was a ‘‘manufacturer’’ of those
consumer products, which were ‘‘distributed
in commerce,’’ as those terms are defined in
CPSA sections 3(a)(5), (8), and (11), 15 U.S.C.
2052(a)(5), (8), and (11).
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 147 (Monday, August 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38415-38417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18508]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 09-C0029]
Dollar General Corporation, Provisional Acceptance of a
Settlement Agreement and Order
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in
the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e).
Published below is a provisionally-accepted Settlement Agreement with
Dollar General Corporation, containing a civil penalty of $100,000.00.
DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written
request with the Office of the Secretary by August 18, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the Comment 09-C0029, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Room 502, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neal S. Cohen, Trial Attorney,
Division of Compliance, Office of the General Counsel, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-
4408; telephone (301) 504-7504 or M. Reza Malihi, Trial Attorney, (same
address); telephone (301) 504-7733.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Agreement and Order appears
below.
Dated: July 28, 2009.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
In the Matter of Dollar General Corporation; Settlement Agreement
1. In accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20, Dollar General Corporation
(``DGC''), for itself and on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiaries
referenced in paragraph three (collectively referred to as ``Dollar
General''), and the staff (``Staff'') of the United States Consumer
Product Safety Commission (``CPSC'' or the ``Commission'') enter
into this Settlement Agreement (``Agreement''). The Agreement and
the incorporated attached Order (``Order'') settle the Staff's
allegations set forth below.
Parties
2. The Commission is an independent federal regulatory agency
established
[[Page 38416]]
pursuant to, and responsible for the enforcement of, the Consumer
Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2051-2089 (``CPSA'').
3. DGC is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
Tennessee, with its principal offices located in Goodlettsville,
Tennessee. At all times relevant hereto, the following wholly owned
subsidiaries of DGC had principal offices located in Goodlettsville,
Tennessee. Dollar General Merchandising, Inc. (``DGMI''), a
corporation, and DG Retail, LLC, a limited liability company, were
entities organized and existing under the laws of Tennessee.
Dolgencorp, Inc. (``Dolgencorp,'') Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc., and
Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. were corporations, and Dollar General
Partners was a partnership, organized and existing under the laws of
Kentucky. (DG Retail LLC, Dolgencorp, Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc.,
Dolgencorp of New York, Inc., and Dollar General Partners, are
collectively referred to as the ``Retail Subsidiaries.'') At all
times relevant hereto, Dollar General imported and/or sold toys and
other children's products, among other general merchandise.
Staff Allegations
4. During September 2007, DGMI imported into the United States
about 63,000 units of green, plastic Frankenstein head-shaped
Tumblers (``Tumbler(s)''). The Tumblers were, in turn, offered for
sale or sold to consumers at retail stores nationwide owned or
operated by DGC or one of its Retail Subsidiaries in September 2007
for about $1 per unit.
5. Between April 2007 and July 2007, DGMI imported about 380,000
Pull-Back Action Toy Cars, comprising two styles that included a
four pack of ``Super Wheels'' (UPC 400016576344) and a two
pack of ``Super Racer'' cars (UPC 883788965002) (``Toy
Car(s)''). The Toy Cars were, in turn, offered for sale or sold to
consumers at retail stores nationwide owned or operated by DGC or
one of its Retail Subsidiaries from April 2007 through October 2007
for about $1 per pack.
6. Between March 2005 and October 2007, Dolgencorp imported
about 51,000 Children's Sunglasses, yellow in color, with the word
``CHINA'' printed on the left side of the frame, and the UPC
400007860896 and words ``Fashion Sunglasses'' and ``Time to
Play Every Day'' printed on the product's red hangtag
(``Sunglasses''). The Sunglasses were, in turn, offered for sale or
sold to consumers at retail stores nationwide owned or operated by
DGC or one of its Retail Subsidiaries from March 2005 through
October 2007 for about $1 per unit.
7. The Tumblers, Toy Cars and Sunglasses are ``consumer
product(s),'' and, at all times relevant hereto, Dollar General was
a ``manufacturer'' and/or a ``retailer'' of those consumer
product(s), which were ``distributed in commerce,'' as those terms
are defined in CPSA sections 3(a)(3), (5), (8), (11), and (13), 15
U.S.C. 2052(a)(3), (5), (8), (11), and (13).
8. The Tumblers, Toy Cars and Sunglasses are articles intended
to be entrusted to or for use by children, and, therefore, are
subject to the requirements of the Commission's Ban of Lead-
Containing Paint and Certain Consumer Products Bearing Lead-
Containing Paint, 16 CFR Part 1303 (the ``Ban''). Under the Ban,
toys and other children's articles must not bear ``lead-containing
paint,'' defined as paint or other surface coating materials whose
lead content is more than 0.06 percent of the weight of the total
nonvolatile content of the paint or the weight of the dried paint
film. 16 CFR 1303.2(b)(1)
9. On September 28, 2007, the Staff obtained from the University
of Ashland's Department of Chemistry laboratory results relating to,
in pertinent part, testing for the presence of lead in surface
paints on samples of the Tumblers collected from a DGC retail store
in Ashland, Ohio. The University's test results demonstrated that
paint from the center of the eye on certain Tumbler samples
contained a total lead content in excess of the permissible 0.06
percent limit set forth in the Ban.
10. On October 12, 2007, Dollar General reported to CPSC that it
had commissioned an independent laboratory to conduct validation
testing for the presence of lead in surface coatings on a sample of
the Sunglasses. As expressed in a test report of the same date, the
test results demonstrated that the yellow surface coating and gold
surface coating (printing on sample) contained a total lead content
in excess of the permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in the
Ban.
11. On November 6, 2007, Dollar General reported to CPSC that it
had commissioned an independent laboratory to conduct testing for
the presence of lead in surface coatings on multiple samples of the
Toy Cars. As expressed in two test reports dated November 5, 2007,
the test results demonstrated that samples of the ``4-pack'' and
``2-pack'' Toy Cars contained a total lead content in excess of the
permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in the Ban.
12. On October 4, 2007, the Commission and DGMI announced a
consumer-level recall of about 63,000 units of the Tumblers because
``Surface paint on the center of the eyes of some of the cups can
contain high levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint
standard.'' On November 7, 2007, the Commission and DGMI announced a
recall of about 380,000 units of the Toy Cars because ``Surface
paint on the cars contains excessive levels of lead, violating the
federal lead paint standard.'' On the next day, November 8, 2007,
the Commission and Dolgencorp likewise announced a recall of about
51,000 units of the Sunglasses because ``The yellow surface paint on
the sunglasses may contain excessive levels of lead, violating the
federal lead paint standard.''
13. Although Dollar General reported no incidents or injuries
associated with the Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars, it failed to
take adequate action to ensure that none would bear or contain lead-
containing paint, thereby creating a risk of lead poisoning and
adverse health effects to children.
14. The Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars constitute ``banned
hazardous products'' under CPSA section 8 and the Ban, 15 U.S.C.
2057 and 16 CFR 1303.1(a)(1), 1303.4(b), in that they bear or
contain paint or other surface coating materials whose lead content
exceeds the permissible limit of 0.06 percent of the weight of the
total nonvolatile content of the paint or the weight of the dried
paint film.
15. Between March 2005 and October 2007, Dollar General sold,
manufactured for sale, offered for sale, distributed in commerce, or
imported into the United States, or caused one or more of such acts,
with respect to the aforesaid banned hazardous Tumblers, Sunglasses
and Toy Cars, in violation of section 19(a)(1) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2068(a)(1). Dollar General committed these prohibited acts
``knowingly,'' as that term is defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA,
15 U.S.C. 2069(d).
16. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Dollar
General is subject to civil penalties for the aforementioned
violations.
Dollar General's Responsive Allegations
17. Dollar General denies that it knowingly violated the CPSA.
18. Dollar General states that the vendors of the Tumblers,
Sunglasses and Toy Cars each represented and warranted to Dollar
General that the products furnished by the applicable vendor
complied with all applicable laws, regulations and standards.
Additionally, prior to importing the Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy
Cars, Dollar General had the products tested by a qualified
independent third party laboratory for all applicable safety
standards, including, without limitation, lead paint standards. The
tests indicated that the products were fully compliant.
19. Thus, Dollar General neither knew, nor should have known, of
any potential problems with these products. However, as a result of
industry changes and in an abundance of caution, Dollar General
voluntarily commenced validation re-testing of toys to confirm
initial test results. Dollar General tested hundreds of samples and,
of those, discovered that two, the Sunglasses and Toy Cars, did not
meet applicable standards. Dollar General notified the CPSC of the
results and promptly initiated a voluntary recall of the items.
Agreement of the Parties
20. Under the CPSA, the Commission has jurisdiction over this
matter and over Dollar General.
21. The parties enter into the Agreement for settlement purposes
only. The Agreement does not constitute an admission by Dollar
General, or a determination by the Commission, that Dollar General
has knowingly violated the CPSA.
22. In settlement of the Staff's allegations, DGC shall pay, on
behalf of Dollar General, a civil penalty in the amount of one
hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) within twenty (20) calendar
days of service of the Commission's final Order accepting the
Agreement. This payment shall be made by check payable to the order
of the United States Treasury.
23. Upon the Commission's provisional acceptance of the
Agreement, the Agreement shall be placed on the public record and
published in the Federal Register in accordance with the procedures
set forth in 16 CFR 1118.20(e). In accordance with 16
[[Page 38417]]
CFR 1118.20(f), if the Commission does not receive any written
request not to accept the Agreement within fifteen (15) days, the
Agreement shall be deemed finally accepted on the sixteenth (16th)
day after the date it is published in the Federal Register.
24. Upon the Commission's final acceptance of the Agreement and
issuance of the final Order, Dollar General knowingly, voluntarily,
and completely waives any rights it may have in this matter to the
following: (1) An administrative or judicial hearing; (2) judicial
review or other challenge or contest of the validity of the
Commission's Order or actions; (3) a determination by the Commission
of whether Dollar General failed to comply with the CPSA and its
underlying regulations; (4) a statement of findings of fact and
conclusions of law; and (5) any claims under the Equal Access to
Justice Act.
25. The Commission may publicize the terms of the Agreement and
Order.
26. The Agreement and Order shall apply to, and be binding upon,
Dollar General and each of its successors and assigns.
27. The Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the
CPSA, and violation of the Order may subject those referenced in
paragraph 26 above to appropriate legal action.
28. The Agreement may be used in interpreting the Order.
Understandings, agreements, representations, or interpretations
apart from those contained in the Agreement and Order may not be
used to vary or contradict its terms. The Agreement shall not be
waived, amended, modified, or otherwise altered, without written
agreement thereto executed by the party against whom such waiver,
amendment, modification, or alteration is sought to be enforced.
29. If any provision of the Agreement and Order is held to be
illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws
effective during the terms of the Agreement and Order, such
provision shall be fully severable. The balance of the Agreement and
Order shall remain in full force and effect, unless the Commission
and Dollar General agree that severing the provision materially
affects the purpose of the Agreement and Order.
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION
Dated: June 24, 2009.
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Susan S. Lanigan,
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Dollar General
Corporation, 100 Mission Ridge, Goodlettsville, TN 37072.
Dated: June 24, 2009.--------------------------------------------------
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert R. Stephenson,
Deputy General Counsel,
Dollar General Corporation.
U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION STAFF
Cheryl A. Falvey,
General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel.
Ronald G. Yelenik,
Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel.
Dated: June 25, 2009.--------------------------------------------------
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Neal S. Cohen,
Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance, Office of the General
Counsel.
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
M. Reza Malihi,
Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance, Office of the General
Counsel.
In the Matter of Dollar General Corporation; Order
Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into
between Dollar General Corporation (``DGC''), for itself and on
behalf of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Dollar General
Merchandising, Inc., DG Retail, LLC, Dolgencorp, Inc., Dolgencorp of
Texas, Inc., Dolgencorp of New York, Inc., and Dollar General
Partners (collectively referred to as ``Dollar General''), and the
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (``Commission'') staff, and
the Commission having jurisdiction over the subject matter and over
Dollar General, and it appearing that the Settlement Agreement and
Order are in the public interest, it is
Ordered, that the Settlement Agreement be, and hereby is,
accepted; and it is
Further ordered, that DGC shall pay, on behalf of Dollar
General, a civil penalty in the amount of one hundred thousand
dollars ($100,000.00) within twenty (20) calendar days of service of
the Commission's final Order accepting the Agreement. The payment
shall be made by check payable to the order of the United States
Treasury.
Upon the failure of DGC to make any of the foregoing payments
when due, interest on the unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid by
DGC at the federal legal rate of interest set forth at 28 U.S.C.
1961(a) and (b).
Provisionally accepted and provisional Order issued on the 8th
day of July 2009.
BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-18508 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P