Dollar General Corporation, Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order, 38415-38417 [E9-18508]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 147 / Monday, August 3, 2009 / Notices for sale, distributed in commerce, or imported into the United States, or caused one or more of such acts, with respect to the aforesaid banned hazardous Baskets, Eggs and Tops, in violation of section 19(a)(1) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(1). Hobby Lobby committed these prohibited acts ‘‘knowingly,’’ as that term is defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069(d). 15. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Hobby Lobby is subject to civil penalties for the aforementioned violations. sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES Hobby Lobby’s Responsive Allegations 16. Hobby Lobby denies the Staff’s allegations set forth above that Hobby Lobby knowingly violated the CPSA or that it failed to take adequate action to ensure that none of the products contained lead containing paint. Agreement of the Parties 17. Under the CPSA, the Commission has jurisdiction over this matter and over Hobby Lobby. 18. The parties enter into the Agreement for settlement purposes only. The Agreement does not constitute an admission by Hobby Lobby, or a determination by the Commission, that Hobby Lobby has knowingly violated the CPSA. 19. In settlement of the Staff’s allegations, Hobby Lobby shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) within twenty (20) calendar days of service of the Commission’s final Order accepting the Agreement. This payment shall be made by check payable to the order of the United States Treasury. 20. Upon the Commission’s provisional acceptance of the Agreement, the Agreement shall be placed in the public record and published in the Federal Register in accordance with the procedures set forth in 16 CFR 1118.20(e). In accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20(f), if the Commission does not receive any written request not to accept the Agreement within fifteen (15) days, the Agreement shall be deemed finally accepted on the sixteenth (16th) day after the date it is published in the Federal Register. 21. Upon the Commission’s final acceptance of the Agreement and issuance of the final Order, Hobby Lobby knowingly, voluntarily, and completely waives any rights it may have in this matter to the following: (1) An administrative or judicial hearing; (2) judicial review or other challenge or contest of the validity of the Commission’s Order or actions; (3) a determination by the Commission of whether Hobby Lobby failed to comply with the CPSA and its underlying regulations; (4) a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (5) any claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act. 22. The Commission may publicize the terms of the Agreement and Order. 23. The Agreement and Order shall apply to, and be binding upon, Hobby Lobby and each of its successors and assigns. 24. The Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the CPSA, and violation of the Order may subject Hobby Lobby and those designated in paragraph 23 above to appropriate legal action. 25. The Agreement may be used in interpreting the Order. Understandings, VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:05 Jul 31, 2009 Jkt 217001 agreements, representations, or interpretations apart from those contained in the Agreement and Order may not be used to vary or contradict its terms. The Agreement shall not be waived, amended, modified, or otherwise altered, except in a writing that is executed by the party against whom such waiver, amendment, modification, or alteration is sought to be enforced. 26. If any provision of the Agreement and Order is held to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws effective during the terms of the Agreement and Order, such provision shall be fully severable. The balance of the Agreement and Order shall remain in full force and effect, unless the Commission and Hobby Lobby agree that severing the provision materially affects the purpose of the Agreement and Order. Dated: March 3, 2009. Steve Green, President, Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 7707 SW. 44th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73179. Dated: March 3, 2009. Peter M. Dobelbower, Vice President & General Counsel, Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Staff. Cheryl A. Falvey, General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel. Ronald G. Yelenik, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel. Dated: March 6, 2009. M. Reza Malihi, Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance, Office of the General Counsel. Order Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into between Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (‘‘Hobby Lobby’’) and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘Commission’’) staff, and the Commission having jurisdiction over the subject matter and over Hobby Lobby, and it appearing that the Settlement Agreement and Order are in the public interest, it is ORDERED, that the Settlement Agreement be, and hereby is, accepted; and it is FURTHER ORDERED, that Hobby Lobby shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) within twenty (20) calendar days of service of the Commission’s final Order accepting the Agreement. The payment shall be made by check payable to the order of the United States Treasury. Upon the failure of Hobby Lobby to make any of the foregoing payments when due, interest on the unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid by Hobby Lobby at the Federal legal rate of interest set forth at 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b). Provisionally accepted and provisional Order issued on the 8th day of July, 2009. By Order of the Commission. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. [FR Doc. E9–18516 Filed 7–31–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6355–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38415 CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION [CPSC Docket No. 09–C0029] Dollar General Corporation, Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published below is a provisionally-accepted Settlement Agreement with Dollar General Corporation, containing a civil penalty of $100,000.00. DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written request with the Office of the Secretary by August 18, 2009. ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement should send written comments to the Comment 09–C0029, Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Room 502, Bethesda, Maryland 20814– 4408. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neal S. Cohen, Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance, Office of the General Counsel, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408; telephone (301) 504–7504 or M. Reza Malihi, Trial Attorney, (same address); telephone (301) 504–7733. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Agreement and Order appears below. Dated: July 28, 2009. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary. In the Matter of Dollar General Corporation; Settlement Agreement 1. In accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20, Dollar General Corporation (‘‘DGC’’), for itself and on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiaries referenced in paragraph three (collectively referred to as ‘‘Dollar General’’), and the staff (‘‘Staff’’) of the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or the ‘‘Commission’’) enter into this Settlement Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’). The Agreement and the incorporated attached Order (‘‘Order’’) settle the Staff’s allegations set forth below. Parties 2. The Commission is an independent federal regulatory agency established E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1 38416 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 147 / Monday, August 3, 2009 / Notices sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES pursuant to, and responsible for the enforcement of, the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2051–2089 (‘‘CPSA’’). 3. DGC is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Tennessee, with its principal offices located in Goodlettsville, Tennessee. At all times relevant hereto, the following wholly owned subsidiaries of DGC had principal offices located in Goodlettsville, Tennessee. Dollar General Merchandising, Inc. (‘‘DGMI’’), a corporation, and DG Retail, LLC, a limited liability company, were entities organized and existing under the laws of Tennessee. Dolgencorp, Inc. (‘‘Dolgencorp,’’) Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc., and Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. were corporations, and Dollar General Partners was a partnership, organized and existing under the laws of Kentucky. (DG Retail LLC, Dolgencorp, Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc., Dolgencorp of New York, Inc., and Dollar General Partners, are collectively referred to as the ‘‘Retail Subsidiaries.’’) At all times relevant hereto, Dollar General imported and/or sold toys and other children’s products, among other general merchandise. Staff Allegations 4. During September 2007, DGMI imported into the United States about 63,000 units of green, plastic Frankenstein head-shaped Tumblers (‘‘Tumbler(s)’’). The Tumblers were, in turn, offered for sale or sold to consumers at retail stores nationwide owned or operated by DGC or one of its Retail Subsidiaries in September 2007 for about $1 per unit. 5. Between April 2007 and July 2007, DGMI imported about 380,000 Pull-Back Action Toy Cars, comprising two styles that included a four pack of ‘‘Super Wheels’’ (UPC #400016576344) and a two pack of ‘‘Super Racer’’ cars (UPC #883788965002) (‘‘Toy Car(s)’’). The Toy Cars were, in turn, offered for sale or sold to consumers at retail stores nationwide owned or operated by DGC or one of its Retail Subsidiaries from April 2007 through October 2007 for about $1 per pack. 6. Between March 2005 and October 2007, Dolgencorp imported about 51,000 Children’s Sunglasses, yellow in color, with the word ‘‘CHINA’’ printed on the left side of the frame, and the UPC #400007860896 and words ‘‘Fashion Sunglasses’’ and ‘‘Time to Play Every Day’’ printed on the product’s red hangtag (‘‘Sunglasses’’). The Sunglasses were, in turn, offered for sale or sold to consumers at retail stores nationwide owned or operated by DGC or one of its Retail Subsidiaries from March 2005 through October 2007 for about $1 per unit. 7. The Tumblers, Toy Cars and Sunglasses are ‘‘consumer product(s),’’ and, at all times relevant hereto, Dollar General was a ‘‘manufacturer’’ and/or a ‘‘retailer’’ of those consumer product(s), which were ‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as those terms are defined in CPSA sections 3(a)(3), (5), (8), (11), and (13), 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(3), (5), (8), (11), and (13). 8. The Tumblers, Toy Cars and Sunglasses are articles intended to be entrusted to or for use by children, and, therefore, are subject to the requirements of the Commission’s Ban of VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:05 Jul 31, 2009 Jkt 217001 Lead-Containing Paint and Certain Consumer Products Bearing Lead-Containing Paint, 16 CFR Part 1303 (the ‘‘Ban’’). Under the Ban, toys and other children’s articles must not bear ‘‘lead-containing paint,’’ defined as paint or other surface coating materials whose lead content is more than 0.06 percent of the weight of the total nonvolatile content of the paint or the weight of the dried paint film. 16 CFR 1303.2(b)(1) 9. On September 28, 2007, the Staff obtained from the University of Ashland’s Department of Chemistry laboratory results relating to, in pertinent part, testing for the presence of lead in surface paints on samples of the Tumblers collected from a DGC retail store in Ashland, Ohio. The University’s test results demonstrated that paint from the center of the eye on certain Tumbler samples contained a total lead content in excess of the permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in the Ban. 10. On October 12, 2007, Dollar General reported to CPSC that it had commissioned an independent laboratory to conduct validation testing for the presence of lead in surface coatings on a sample of the Sunglasses. As expressed in a test report of the same date, the test results demonstrated that the yellow surface coating and gold surface coating (printing on sample) contained a total lead content in excess of the permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in the Ban. 11. On November 6, 2007, Dollar General reported to CPSC that it had commissioned an independent laboratory to conduct testing for the presence of lead in surface coatings on multiple samples of the Toy Cars. As expressed in two test reports dated November 5, 2007, the test results demonstrated that samples of the ‘‘4-pack’’ and ‘‘2-pack’’ Toy Cars contained a total lead content in excess of the permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in the Ban. 12. On October 4, 2007, the Commission and DGMI announced a consumer-level recall of about 63,000 units of the Tumblers because ‘‘Surface paint on the center of the eyes of some of the cups can contain high levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint standard.’’ On November 7, 2007, the Commission and DGMI announced a recall of about 380,000 units of the Toy Cars because ‘‘Surface paint on the cars contains excessive levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint standard.’’ On the next day, November 8, 2007, the Commission and Dolgencorp likewise announced a recall of about 51,000 units of the Sunglasses because ‘‘The yellow surface paint on the sunglasses may contain excessive levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint standard.’’ 13. Although Dollar General reported no incidents or injuries associated with the Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars, it failed to take adequate action to ensure that none would bear or contain lead-containing paint, thereby creating a risk of lead poisoning and adverse health effects to children. 14. The Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars constitute ‘‘banned hazardous products’’ under CPSA section 8 and the Ban, 15 U.S.C. 2057 and 16 CFR 1303.1(a)(1), 1303.4(b), in that they bear or contain paint or other surface coating materials whose lead content PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 exceeds the permissible limit of 0.06 percent of the weight of the total nonvolatile content of the paint or the weight of the dried paint film. 15. Between March 2005 and October 2007, Dollar General sold, manufactured for sale, offered for sale, distributed in commerce, or imported into the United States, or caused one or more of such acts, with respect to the aforesaid banned hazardous Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars, in violation of section 19(a)(1) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(1). Dollar General committed these prohibited acts ‘‘knowingly,’’ as that term is defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069(d). 16. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Dollar General is subject to civil penalties for the aforementioned violations. Dollar General’s Responsive Allegations 17. Dollar General denies that it knowingly violated the CPSA. 18. Dollar General states that the vendors of the Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars each represented and warranted to Dollar General that the products furnished by the applicable vendor complied with all applicable laws, regulations and standards. Additionally, prior to importing the Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars, Dollar General had the products tested by a qualified independent third party laboratory for all applicable safety standards, including, without limitation, lead paint standards. The tests indicated that the products were fully compliant. 19. Thus, Dollar General neither knew, nor should have known, of any potential problems with these products. However, as a result of industry changes and in an abundance of caution, Dollar General voluntarily commenced validation re-testing of toys to confirm initial test results. Dollar General tested hundreds of samples and, of those, discovered that two, the Sunglasses and Toy Cars, did not meet applicable standards. Dollar General notified the CPSC of the results and promptly initiated a voluntary recall of the items. Agreement of the Parties 20. Under the CPSA, the Commission has jurisdiction over this matter and over Dollar General. 21. The parties enter into the Agreement for settlement purposes only. The Agreement does not constitute an admission by Dollar General, or a determination by the Commission, that Dollar General has knowingly violated the CPSA. 22. In settlement of the Staff’s allegations, DGC shall pay, on behalf of Dollar General, a civil penalty in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) within twenty (20) calendar days of service of the Commission’s final Order accepting the Agreement. This payment shall be made by check payable to the order of the United States Treasury. 23. Upon the Commission’s provisional acceptance of the Agreement, the Agreement shall be placed on the public record and published in the Federal Register in accordance with the procedures set forth in 16 CFR 1118.20(e). In accordance with 16 E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 147 / Monday, August 3, 2009 / Notices CFR 1118.20(f), if the Commission does not receive any written request not to accept the Agreement within fifteen (15) days, the Agreement shall be deemed finally accepted on the sixteenth (16th) day after the date it is published in the Federal Register. 24. Upon the Commission’s final acceptance of the Agreement and issuance of the final Order, Dollar General knowingly, voluntarily, and completely waives any rights it may have in this matter to the following: (1) An administrative or judicial hearing; (2) judicial review or other challenge or contest of the validity of the Commission’s Order or actions; (3) a determination by the Commission of whether Dollar General failed to comply with the CPSA and its underlying regulations; (4) a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (5) any claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act. 25. The Commission may publicize the terms of the Agreement and Order. 26. The Agreement and Order shall apply to, and be binding upon, Dollar General and each of its successors and assigns. 27. The Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the CPSA, and violation of the Order may subject those referenced in paragraph 26 above to appropriate legal action. 28. The Agreement may be used in interpreting the Order. Understandings, agreements, representations, or interpretations apart from those contained in the Agreement and Order may not be used to vary or contradict its terms. The Agreement shall not be waived, amended, modified, or otherwise altered, without written agreement thereto executed by the party against whom such waiver, amendment, modification, or alteration is sought to be enforced. 29. If any provision of the Agreement and Order is held to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws effective during the terms of the Agreement and Order, such provision shall be fully severable. The balance of the Agreement and Order shall remain in full force and effect, unless the Commission and Dollar General agree that severing the provision materially affects the purpose of the Agreement and Order. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION Dated: June 24, 2009. By: lllllllllllllllllll Susan S. Lanigan, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Dollar General Corporation, 100 Mission Ridge, Goodlettsville, TN 37072. Dated: June 24, 2009. lllllllllll By: lllllllllllllllllll Robert R. Stephenson, Deputy General Counsel, Dollar General Corporation. U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION STAFF Cheryl A. Falvey, General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel. Ronald G. Yelenik, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel. Dated: June 25, 2009. lllllllllll By: lllllllllllllllllll VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:05 Jul 31, 2009 Jkt 217001 Neal S. Cohen, Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance, Office of the General Counsel. By: lllllllllllllllllll M. Reza Malihi, Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance, Office of the General Counsel. In the Matter of Dollar General Corporation; Order Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into between Dollar General Corporation (‘‘DGC’’), for itself and on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Dollar General Merchandising, Inc., DG Retail, LLC, Dolgencorp, Inc., Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc., Dolgencorp of New York, Inc., and Dollar General Partners (collectively referred to as ‘‘Dollar General’’), and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘Commission’’) staff, and the Commission having jurisdiction over the subject matter and over Dollar General, and it appearing that the Settlement Agreement and Order are in the public interest, it is Ordered, that the Settlement Agreement be, and hereby is, accepted; and it is Further ordered, that DGC shall pay, on behalf of Dollar General, a civil penalty in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) within twenty (20) calendar days of service of the Commission’s final Order accepting the Agreement. The payment shall be made by check payable to the order of the United States Treasury. Upon the failure of DGC to make any of the foregoing payments when due, interest on the unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid by DGC at the federal legal rate of interest set forth at 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b). Provisionally accepted and provisional Order issued on the 8th day of July 2009. BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION: lllllllllllllllllllll Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. [FR Doc. E9–18508 Filed 7–31–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6355–01–P CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION [CPSC Docket No. 09–C0030] Haier America Trading, LLC, Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published below is a provisionally accepted Settlement Agreement with Haier America Trading, LLC, containing a civil penalty of $587,500.00. PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38417 DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written request with the Office of the Secretary by August 18, 2009. ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement should send written comments to the Comment 09–C0030, Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Room 502, Bethesda, Maryland 20814– 4408. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seth B. Popkin, Lead Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance, Office of the General Counsel, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408; telephone (301) 504–7612. The text of the Agreement and Order appears below. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: July 29, 2009. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary. United States of America—Consumer Product Safety Commission In the Matter of Haier America Trading, LLC, CPSC Docket No. 09–C0030. Settlement Agreement 1. In accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20, Haier America Trading, LLC (‘‘Haier America’’) and the staff (‘‘Staff’’) of the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘Commission’’) enter into this Settlement Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’). The Agreement and the incorporated attached Order (‘‘Order’’) settle the Staff’s allegations set forth below. Parties 2. The Commission is an independent Federal regulatory agency established pursuant to, and responsible for the enforcement of, the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2051–2089 (‘‘CPSA’’). 3. Haier America is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of New York, with its principal offices located in New York, New York. At all times relevant hereto, Haier America sold appliances. Staff Allegations 4. From on or about January to July 2004, Haier America distributed in commerce, including through importation and sale to retailers, multiple units of the Haier America Oscillating Tower Fan model FTM140GG (‘‘Fan’’). 5. The Fans are ‘‘consumer product[s],’’ and, at all times relevant hereto, Haier America was a ‘‘manufacturer’’ of those consumer products, which were ‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as those terms are defined in CPSA sections 3(a)(5), (8), and (11), 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5), (8), and (11). E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 147 (Monday, August 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38415-38417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

[CPSC Docket No. 09-C0029]


Dollar General Corporation, Provisional Acceptance of a 
Settlement Agreement and Order

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements 
which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in 
the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). 
Published below is a provisionally-accepted Settlement Agreement with 
Dollar General Corporation, containing a civil penalty of $100,000.00.

DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this 
agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written 
request with the Office of the Secretary by August 18, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement 
should send written comments to the Comment 09-C0029, Office of the 
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, 
Room 502, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4408.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neal S. Cohen, Trial Attorney, 
Division of Compliance, Office of the General Counsel, Consumer Product 
Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-
4408; telephone (301) 504-7504 or M. Reza Malihi, Trial Attorney, (same 
address); telephone (301) 504-7733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Agreement and Order appears 
below.

    Dated: July 28, 2009.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.

In the Matter of Dollar General Corporation; Settlement Agreement

    1. In accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20, Dollar General Corporation 
(``DGC''), for itself and on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiaries 
referenced in paragraph three (collectively referred to as ``Dollar 
General''), and the staff (``Staff'') of the United States Consumer 
Product Safety Commission (``CPSC'' or the ``Commission'') enter 
into this Settlement Agreement (``Agreement''). The Agreement and 
the incorporated attached Order (``Order'') settle the Staff's 
allegations set forth below.

Parties

    2. The Commission is an independent federal regulatory agency 
established

[[Page 38416]]

pursuant to, and responsible for the enforcement of, the Consumer 
Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2051-2089 (``CPSA'').
    3. DGC is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of 
Tennessee, with its principal offices located in Goodlettsville, 
Tennessee. At all times relevant hereto, the following wholly owned 
subsidiaries of DGC had principal offices located in Goodlettsville, 
Tennessee. Dollar General Merchandising, Inc. (``DGMI''), a 
corporation, and DG Retail, LLC, a limited liability company, were 
entities organized and existing under the laws of Tennessee. 
Dolgencorp, Inc. (``Dolgencorp,'') Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc., and 
Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. were corporations, and Dollar General 
Partners was a partnership, organized and existing under the laws of 
Kentucky. (DG Retail LLC, Dolgencorp, Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc., 
Dolgencorp of New York, Inc., and Dollar General Partners, are 
collectively referred to as the ``Retail Subsidiaries.'') At all 
times relevant hereto, Dollar General imported and/or sold toys and 
other children's products, among other general merchandise.

Staff Allegations

    4. During September 2007, DGMI imported into the United States 
about 63,000 units of green, plastic Frankenstein head-shaped 
Tumblers (``Tumbler(s)''). The Tumblers were, in turn, offered for 
sale or sold to consumers at retail stores nationwide owned or 
operated by DGC or one of its Retail Subsidiaries in September 2007 
for about $1 per unit.
    5. Between April 2007 and July 2007, DGMI imported about 380,000 
Pull-Back Action Toy Cars, comprising two styles that included a 
four pack of ``Super Wheels'' (UPC 400016576344) and a two 
pack of ``Super Racer'' cars (UPC 883788965002) (``Toy 
Car(s)''). The Toy Cars were, in turn, offered for sale or sold to 
consumers at retail stores nationwide owned or operated by DGC or 
one of its Retail Subsidiaries from April 2007 through October 2007 
for about $1 per pack.
    6. Between March 2005 and October 2007, Dolgencorp imported 
about 51,000 Children's Sunglasses, yellow in color, with the word 
``CHINA'' printed on the left side of the frame, and the UPC 
400007860896 and words ``Fashion Sunglasses'' and ``Time to 
Play Every Day'' printed on the product's red hangtag 
(``Sunglasses''). The Sunglasses were, in turn, offered for sale or 
sold to consumers at retail stores nationwide owned or operated by 
DGC or one of its Retail Subsidiaries from March 2005 through 
October 2007 for about $1 per unit.
    7. The Tumblers, Toy Cars and Sunglasses are ``consumer 
product(s),'' and, at all times relevant hereto, Dollar General was 
a ``manufacturer'' and/or a ``retailer'' of those consumer 
product(s), which were ``distributed in commerce,'' as those terms 
are defined in CPSA sections 3(a)(3), (5), (8), (11), and (13), 15 
U.S.C. 2052(a)(3), (5), (8), (11), and (13).
    8. The Tumblers, Toy Cars and Sunglasses are articles intended 
to be entrusted to or for use by children, and, therefore, are 
subject to the requirements of the Commission's Ban of Lead-
Containing Paint and Certain Consumer Products Bearing Lead-
Containing Paint, 16 CFR Part 1303 (the ``Ban''). Under the Ban, 
toys and other children's articles must not bear ``lead-containing 
paint,'' defined as paint or other surface coating materials whose 
lead content is more than 0.06 percent of the weight of the total 
nonvolatile content of the paint or the weight of the dried paint 
film. 16 CFR 1303.2(b)(1)
    9. On September 28, 2007, the Staff obtained from the University 
of Ashland's Department of Chemistry laboratory results relating to, 
in pertinent part, testing for the presence of lead in surface 
paints on samples of the Tumblers collected from a DGC retail store 
in Ashland, Ohio. The University's test results demonstrated that 
paint from the center of the eye on certain Tumbler samples 
contained a total lead content in excess of the permissible 0.06 
percent limit set forth in the Ban.
    10. On October 12, 2007, Dollar General reported to CPSC that it 
had commissioned an independent laboratory to conduct validation 
testing for the presence of lead in surface coatings on a sample of 
the Sunglasses. As expressed in a test report of the same date, the 
test results demonstrated that the yellow surface coating and gold 
surface coating (printing on sample) contained a total lead content 
in excess of the permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in the 
Ban.
    11. On November 6, 2007, Dollar General reported to CPSC that it 
had commissioned an independent laboratory to conduct testing for 
the presence of lead in surface coatings on multiple samples of the 
Toy Cars. As expressed in two test reports dated November 5, 2007, 
the test results demonstrated that samples of the ``4-pack'' and 
``2-pack'' Toy Cars contained a total lead content in excess of the 
permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in the Ban.
    12. On October 4, 2007, the Commission and DGMI announced a 
consumer-level recall of about 63,000 units of the Tumblers because 
``Surface paint on the center of the eyes of some of the cups can 
contain high levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint 
standard.'' On November 7, 2007, the Commission and DGMI announced a 
recall of about 380,000 units of the Toy Cars because ``Surface 
paint on the cars contains excessive levels of lead, violating the 
federal lead paint standard.'' On the next day, November 8, 2007, 
the Commission and Dolgencorp likewise announced a recall of about 
51,000 units of the Sunglasses because ``The yellow surface paint on 
the sunglasses may contain excessive levels of lead, violating the 
federal lead paint standard.''
    13. Although Dollar General reported no incidents or injuries 
associated with the Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars, it failed to 
take adequate action to ensure that none would bear or contain lead-
containing paint, thereby creating a risk of lead poisoning and 
adverse health effects to children.
    14. The Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy Cars constitute ``banned 
hazardous products'' under CPSA section 8 and the Ban, 15 U.S.C. 
2057 and 16 CFR 1303.1(a)(1), 1303.4(b), in that they bear or 
contain paint or other surface coating materials whose lead content 
exceeds the permissible limit of 0.06 percent of the weight of the 
total nonvolatile content of the paint or the weight of the dried 
paint film.
    15. Between March 2005 and October 2007, Dollar General sold, 
manufactured for sale, offered for sale, distributed in commerce, or 
imported into the United States, or caused one or more of such acts, 
with respect to the aforesaid banned hazardous Tumblers, Sunglasses 
and Toy Cars, in violation of section 19(a)(1) of the CPSA, 15 
U.S.C. 2068(a)(1). Dollar General committed these prohibited acts 
``knowingly,'' as that term is defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 
15 U.S.C. 2069(d).
    16. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Dollar 
General is subject to civil penalties for the aforementioned 
violations.

Dollar General's Responsive Allegations

    17. Dollar General denies that it knowingly violated the CPSA.
    18. Dollar General states that the vendors of the Tumblers, 
Sunglasses and Toy Cars each represented and warranted to Dollar 
General that the products furnished by the applicable vendor 
complied with all applicable laws, regulations and standards. 
Additionally, prior to importing the Tumblers, Sunglasses and Toy 
Cars, Dollar General had the products tested by a qualified 
independent third party laboratory for all applicable safety 
standards, including, without limitation, lead paint standards. The 
tests indicated that the products were fully compliant.
    19. Thus, Dollar General neither knew, nor should have known, of 
any potential problems with these products. However, as a result of 
industry changes and in an abundance of caution, Dollar General 
voluntarily commenced validation re-testing of toys to confirm 
initial test results. Dollar General tested hundreds of samples and, 
of those, discovered that two, the Sunglasses and Toy Cars, did not 
meet applicable standards. Dollar General notified the CPSC of the 
results and promptly initiated a voluntary recall of the items.

Agreement of the Parties

    20. Under the CPSA, the Commission has jurisdiction over this 
matter and over Dollar General.
    21. The parties enter into the Agreement for settlement purposes 
only. The Agreement does not constitute an admission by Dollar 
General, or a determination by the Commission, that Dollar General 
has knowingly violated the CPSA.
    22. In settlement of the Staff's allegations, DGC shall pay, on 
behalf of Dollar General, a civil penalty in the amount of one 
hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) within twenty (20) calendar 
days of service of the Commission's final Order accepting the 
Agreement. This payment shall be made by check payable to the order 
of the United States Treasury.
    23. Upon the Commission's provisional acceptance of the 
Agreement, the Agreement shall be placed on the public record and 
published in the Federal Register in accordance with the procedures 
set forth in 16 CFR 1118.20(e). In accordance with 16

[[Page 38417]]

CFR 1118.20(f), if the Commission does not receive any written 
request not to accept the Agreement within fifteen (15) days, the 
Agreement shall be deemed finally accepted on the sixteenth (16th) 
day after the date it is published in the Federal Register.
    24. Upon the Commission's final acceptance of the Agreement and 
issuance of the final Order, Dollar General knowingly, voluntarily, 
and completely waives any rights it may have in this matter to the 
following: (1) An administrative or judicial hearing; (2) judicial 
review or other challenge or contest of the validity of the 
Commission's Order or actions; (3) a determination by the Commission 
of whether Dollar General failed to comply with the CPSA and its 
underlying regulations; (4) a statement of findings of fact and 
conclusions of law; and (5) any claims under the Equal Access to 
Justice Act.
    25. The Commission may publicize the terms of the Agreement and 
Order.
    26. The Agreement and Order shall apply to, and be binding upon, 
Dollar General and each of its successors and assigns.
    27. The Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the 
CPSA, and violation of the Order may subject those referenced in 
paragraph 26 above to appropriate legal action.
    28. The Agreement may be used in interpreting the Order. 
Understandings, agreements, representations, or interpretations 
apart from those contained in the Agreement and Order may not be 
used to vary or contradict its terms. The Agreement shall not be 
waived, amended, modified, or otherwise altered, without written 
agreement thereto executed by the party against whom such waiver, 
amendment, modification, or alteration is sought to be enforced.
    29. If any provision of the Agreement and Order is held to be 
illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws 
effective during the terms of the Agreement and Order, such 
provision shall be fully severable. The balance of the Agreement and 
Order shall remain in full force and effect, unless the Commission 
and Dollar General agree that severing the provision materially 
affects the purpose of the Agreement and Order.

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION

    Dated: June 24, 2009.

By:--------------------------------------------------------------------

Susan S. Lanigan,
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Dollar General 
Corporation, 100 Mission Ridge, Goodlettsville, TN 37072.

Dated: June 24, 2009.--------------------------------------------------

By:--------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert R. Stephenson,
Deputy General Counsel,
Dollar General Corporation.

U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION STAFF

Cheryl A. Falvey,
General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel.

Ronald G. Yelenik,
Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel.

Dated: June 25, 2009.--------------------------------------------------
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------

Neal S. Cohen,
Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance, Office of the General 
Counsel.

By:--------------------------------------------------------------------

M. Reza Malihi,
Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance, Office of the General 
Counsel.

In the Matter of Dollar General Corporation; Order

    Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into 
between Dollar General Corporation (``DGC''), for itself and on 
behalf of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Dollar General 
Merchandising, Inc., DG Retail, LLC, Dolgencorp, Inc., Dolgencorp of 
Texas, Inc., Dolgencorp of New York, Inc., and Dollar General 
Partners (collectively referred to as ``Dollar General''), and the 
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (``Commission'') staff, and 
the Commission having jurisdiction over the subject matter and over 
Dollar General, and it appearing that the Settlement Agreement and 
Order are in the public interest, it is
    Ordered, that the Settlement Agreement be, and hereby is, 
accepted; and it is
    Further ordered, that DGC shall pay, on behalf of Dollar 
General, a civil penalty in the amount of one hundred thousand 
dollars ($100,000.00) within twenty (20) calendar days of service of 
the Commission's final Order accepting the Agreement. The payment 
shall be made by check payable to the order of the United States 
Treasury.

    Upon the failure of DGC to make any of the foregoing payments 
when due, interest on the unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid by 
DGC at the federal legal rate of interest set forth at 28 U.S.C. 
1961(a) and (b).

    Provisionally accepted and provisional Order issued on the 8th 
day of July 2009.

BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-18508 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.