Action Affecting Export Privileges; Micei International; In the Matter of: Micei International, Respondent; Order Staying Enforcement of Final Decision and Order Pending Appeal, 38394 [E9-18428]

Download as PDF 38394 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 147 / Monday, August 3, 2009 / Notices species, as well as the interactions between them; (3) determine the quantity and distribution of net benefits derived from living marine resources; (4) predict the biological, ecological, and economic impacts of existing management action and proposed management options; and (5) ensure that the observer programs can safely and efficiently collect the information required for the previous four uses. In particular, these biological and economic data collection programs contribute to analyses required under the MSA, the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the MMPA, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), Executive Order 12866 (EO 12866), as well as a variety of state statutes. The confidentiality of the data will be protected as required by law. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Some mandatory (e.g., vessel safety checks), most voluntary. OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395–3897. Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at dHynek@doc.gov). Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395–7285, or David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov. Dated: July 28, 2009. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. E9–18376 Filed 7–31–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P Final Decision and Order (the ‘‘Order’’) in this administrative enforcement proceeding against Respondent Micei International (‘‘Micei’’) on May 14, 2009, which was effective upon publication in the Federal Register on May 26, 2009. 74 FR 24788 (May 26, 2009). The Order affirmed the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Decision and Order finding, in accordance with Section 766.7 (Default Order) of the Export Administration Regulations (the ‘‘Regulations’’),1 that Micei had waived its right to contest the allegations contained in the (amended) charging letter issued by the Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’), and that Micei had, as alleged, committed 14 violations of the Regulations. The allegations involved Micei’s knowing participation in seven export transactions using an individual subject to a Denial Order as an employee or agent to negotiate for and purchase items in the United States for export from the United States to Micei in Macedonia. The Order also affirmed the recommended sanctions of a civil penalty of $126,000, and a denial of Micei’s export privileges for a period of five years. On May 19, 2009, Micei filed a Petition for Immediate Stay of Publication and Enforcement of Final Decision and Order Pending Outcome of Respondent’s Petition To Set Aside Default and Vacate Final Decision and Order or Alternatively Pending Appeal (‘‘Stay Petition’’).2 On June 30, 2009, Micei filed a Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (‘‘Stay Motion’’) with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (‘‘D.C. Circuit’’), seeking a stay of the Order pending appeal.3 In its June 30 filing with the DC Circuit, Micei made a number of assertions and presented documentary materials that were not part of the Stay Petition it had filed with BIS. BIS is continuing to evaluate and investigate questions surrounding the accuracy and foundation of those assertions, but nonetheless does not wish further delay in addressing and resolving the merits DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES [08–BIS–0005] Action Affecting Export Privileges; Micei International; In the Matter of: Micei International, Respondent; Order Staying Enforcement of Final Decision and Order Pending Appeal The Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security (‘‘Acting Under Secretary’’) issued a VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:05 Jul 31, 2009 Jkt 217001 1 The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 774 (2009). The violations at issue, which occurred in 2003, are governed by the 2003 version of the Code of Federal Regulations. 15 CFR parts 730–774 (2003). The 2009 Regulations govern the procedural aspects of this case. 2 On May 19, 2009, Micei also filed with BIS a Petition To Set Aside Default and Vacate Final Decision and Order. On June 26, 2009, Micei filed a notice with BIS to withdraw that petition, but did not address the Stay Petition it had filed with BIS. 3 Micei had previously filed a Notice of Appeal to the DC Circuit on May 29, 2009. Micei subsequently filed a second Notice of Appeal on June 29, 2009, petitioning for review of the Order. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 of Micei’s petition for review. In addition, Micei has recently hired new U.S-based counsel and there are some indications that Micei may be prepared to more meaningfully engage on the issues. Based on the circumstances here, I have decided, in performing duties delegated to me by the Acting Under Secretary, to stay enforcement of the Order pending resolution of the DC Circuit appeal.4 Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that enforcement of the Final Decision and Order against Micei International, dated May 14, 2009, and effective on May 26, 2009, is henceforth stayed pending resolution of the petition for review currently before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. This Order is effective immediately and shall be published in the Federal Register. Dated: July 24, 2009. Gay Shrum, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security. [FR Doc. E9–18428 Filed 7–31–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Patent and Trademark Office Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Title: Trademark Petitions. Form Number(s): None. Agency Approval Number: 0651– 00xx. Type of Request: New collection. Burden: 862 hours. Number of Respondents: 953 responses. Avg. Hours per Response: 30 minutes (0.50 hours) to one hour. This includes time to gather the necessary information, create the documents, and submit the completed request to the USPTO. Needs and Uses: The information described in this collection is used by the public for a variety of private 4 This determination does not constitute a finding or conclusion that BIS agrees with the assertions or evidentiary materials included in Micei’s Stay Motion (or Stay Petition). E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 147 (Monday, August 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18428]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

[08-BIS-0005]


Action Affecting Export Privileges; Micei International; In the 
Matter of: Micei International, Respondent; Order Staying Enforcement 
of Final Decision and Order Pending Appeal

    The Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security 
(``Acting Under Secretary'') issued a Final Decision and Order (the 
``Order'') in this administrative enforcement proceeding against 
Respondent Micei International (``Micei'') on May 14, 2009, which was 
effective upon publication in the Federal Register on May 26, 2009. 74 
FR 24788 (May 26, 2009). The Order affirmed the Administrative Law 
Judge's Recommended Decision and Order finding, in accordance with 
Section 766.7 (Default Order) of the Export Administration Regulations 
(the ``Regulations''),\1\ that Micei had waived its right to contest 
the allegations contained in the (amended) charging letter issued by 
the Bureau of Industry and Security (``BIS''), and that Micei had, as 
alleged, committed 14 violations of the Regulations. The allegations 
involved Micei's knowing participation in seven export transactions 
using an individual subject to a Denial Order as an employee or agent 
to negotiate for and purchase items in the United States for export 
from the United States to Micei in Macedonia. The Order also affirmed 
the recommended sanctions of a civil penalty of $126,000, and a denial 
of Micei's export privileges for a period of five years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of 
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2009). The violations 
at issue, which occurred in 2003, are governed by the 2003 version 
of the Code of Federal Regulations. 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2003). The 
2009 Regulations govern the procedural aspects of this case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 19, 2009, Micei filed a Petition for Immediate Stay of 
Publication and Enforcement of Final Decision and Order Pending Outcome 
of Respondent's Petition To Set Aside Default and Vacate Final Decision 
and Order or Alternatively Pending Appeal (``Stay Petition'').\2\ On 
June 30, 2009, Micei filed a Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (``Stay 
Motion'') with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of 
Columbia Circuit (``D.C. Circuit''), seeking a stay of the Order 
pending appeal.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ On May 19, 2009, Micei also filed with BIS a Petition To Set 
Aside Default and Vacate Final Decision and Order. On June 26, 2009, 
Micei filed a notice with BIS to withdraw that petition, but did not 
address the Stay Petition it had filed with BIS.
    \3\ Micei had previously filed a Notice of Appeal to the DC 
Circuit on May 29, 2009. Micei subsequently filed a second Notice of 
Appeal on June 29, 2009, petitioning for review of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its June 30 filing with the DC Circuit, Micei made a number of 
assertions and presented documentary materials that were not part of 
the Stay Petition it had filed with BIS. BIS is continuing to evaluate 
and investigate questions surrounding the accuracy and foundation of 
those assertions, but nonetheless does not wish further delay in 
addressing and resolving the merits of Micei's petition for review. In 
addition, Micei has recently hired new U.S-based counsel and there are 
some indications that Micei may be prepared to more meaningfully engage 
on the issues.
    Based on the circumstances here, I have decided, in performing 
duties delegated to me by the Acting Under Secretary, to stay 
enforcement of the Order pending resolution of the DC Circuit 
appeal.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ This determination does not constitute a finding or 
conclusion that BIS agrees with the assertions or evidentiary 
materials included in Micei's Stay Motion (or Stay Petition).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that enforcement of the Final 
Decision and Order against Micei International, dated May 14, 2009, and 
effective on May 26, 2009, is henceforth stayed pending resolution of 
the petition for review currently before the United States Court of 
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
    This Order is effective immediately and shall be published in the 
Federal Register.

    Dated: July 24, 2009.
Gay Shrum,
Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security.
[FR Doc. E9-18428 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.