Notice of Inventory Completion: St. Lawrence University, Department of Anthropology, Canton, NY; Correction, 38467-38468 [E9-17666]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 147 / Monday, August 3, 2009 / Notices
project mailing list, contact Lauren
McKeever, Project Leader, Telephone
307–367–5300; e-mail
lauren_mckeever@blm.gov.
The
LaBarge Platform Project is generally
located between Townships 26 and 31
North, Ranges 111 through 114 West,
6th Principal Meridian, Sublette, and
Lincoln Counties, Wyoming. The project
area is located within 3 miles of Big
Piney, Wyoming, within 1 mile of La
Barge, Wyoming and 60 miles northwest
of Rock Springs, Wyoming. The project
area covers approximately 218,000 acres
of mixed Federal, State, and private
lands. The BLM Pinedale Field Office
and Rock Springs Field Office manage
the Federal lands in the project area.
The Pinedale Field Office will serve as
the lead office.
The proposed action is in
conformance with the Pinedale
Resource Management/Final
Environmental Impact Statement and
Record of Decision (ROD), 2008, and the
Green River Resource Management Plan
and its ROD, 1997.
The LaBarge Platform Project is
located in an area of existing oil and gas
development, some of which dates back
to the 1920s. The project area is
comprised of 70 percent public lands
administered by the BLM, 5 percent
lands managed by the State of Wyoming
and 24 percent private lands.
Approximately 74 percent of the
subsurface resources are Federal
mineral estate. In April 2008, EOG
submitted to the BLM a proposal to
expand oil and natural gas exploration
and development operations that would
result in further development and
additional wells in the existing LaBarge
Platform and East LaBarge fields which
have been in production since the
1920s.
The purpose of the proposed project
is to explore, extract, and recover oil
and natural gas. EOG proposes to
develop up to approximately 605 new
oil and gas wells from an estimated 455
well pads as infill, exploratory, or stepout wells to all productive formations
including but not limited to: Baxter,
Frontier, and Mesa Verde. Associated
facilities in the proposal include roads,
well pads, and gathering pipelines. No
additional ancillary facilities are
included as part of the proposal nor
considered as part of this analysis.
The estimated life-of-project would be
about 40–50 years. Depending on the
geological characteristics of the target
formation, wells would be drilled using
a combination of vertical, directional,
and horizontal drilling techniques. The
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jul 31, 2009
Jkt 217001
proposal calls for a 10-year construction
and drilling period.
A number of other operators within or
near the EOG project area expect to drill
and develop approximately 175 natural
gas wells within the reasonably
foreseeable future. These possible wells
would be analyzed in a separate
alternative and addressed in the
cumulative effects portion of this EIS
document.
During the preparation of the EIS,
interim exploration and development
will be subject to development
guidelines and decisions made in
applicable NEPA documents, including
but not limited to: Coordinated Activity
Plan for the Big Piney/LaBarge Area,
and ROD, 1991; Enron Oil & Gas
Company East LaBarge Infill Drilling
Project Environmental Assessment (EA),
Finding of No Significant Impact and
Decision Record 1992; the Green River
Resource Management Plan and Final
EIS and ROD, 1997; and the Pinedale
Resource Management Plan/Final EIS
and ROD, 2008.
The LaBarge Platform Project area is
adjacent to the project area considered
in the South Piney Natural Gas Project
Draft EIS (2005). The proponent of the
South Piney Project has not submitted
any revised proposals nor has the BLM
been contacted about continuing any
further NEPA process. Therefore, the
BLM has concluded its NEPA process
and no further environmental
documents will be prepared for the
South Piney Project proposal.
The EIS for the LaBarge Platform
Project will analyze the environmental
consequences of implementing the
proposed action and alternatives to the
proposed action, including a No Action
alternative. Other alternatives that may
be considered in detail include drilling
surface densities and pace of
development different from those of the
proposed action.
Your input is important and will be
considered in the environmental
analysis process. All comment
submittals must include the
commenter’s name and street address.
Comments including the names and
addresses of the respondent will be
available for public inspection at the
above offices during normal business
hours, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or any other personal identifying
information in your comment, be
advised that your entire comment,
including your personal identifying
information may be publicly available at
any time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold from public
review your personal identifying
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38467
information, we cannot guarantee that
we will be able to do so.
All submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public inspection in
their entirety.
Dated: May 22, 2009.
Donald A. Simpson,
State Director.
[FR Doc. E9–18309 Filed 7–31–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Inventory Completion: St.
Lawrence University, Department of
Anthropology, Canton, NY; Correction
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the
completion of an inventory of human
remains in the possession of St.
Lawrence University, Department of
Anthropology, Canton, NY. The human
remains were removed from St.
Lawrence County, NY.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations
in this notice are the sole responsibility
of the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American human remains. The National
Park Service is not responsible for the
determinations in this notice.
This notice corrects the number of
tribes that were determined to be
culturally affiliated in a Notice of
Inventory Completion previously
published in the Federal Register (73
FR 50996–50997, August 29, 2008) by
adding the Oneida, Cayuga, and
Onondaga Indian Nations, in addition to
the Mohawk Nation. After publication,
St. Lawrence University determined that
the Oneida, Mohawk, Cayuga, and
Onondaga Nations are all culturally
affiliated with the Native American
human remains, which are currently in
the possession of the Department of
Anthropology, St. Lawrence University.
In the Federal Register of August 29,
2008, paragraph numbers 6–10 are
corrected by substituting the following:
The region of Gouverneur has been
occupied by Native Americans from
10,000 BP up to the historic period and
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
38468
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 147 / Monday, August 3, 2009 / Notices
beyond. The St. Lawrence River and its
tributaries were continually used as part
of Native American hunting and fishing
grounds. During the French and Indian
War, Native Americans who occupied
the Oswegatchie River region
(Oswegatchie is a tributary of the St.
Lawrence River), which included the
Oneida, Mohawk, Cayuga, and
Onondaga, were dislocated as a result of
the war. Many Native Americans were
forced to abandon their settlements,
which included the abandonment of La
Presentation in 1759. Many Iroquoian
families were forced to migrate to
present-day St. Regis where they were
adopted by the Mohawk. Consultation
with tribal representatives of the
Mohawks of Akwesasne (which is
composed of the Saint Regis Mohawk
Tribe, New York; Mohawk Council of
Akwesasne; and Mohawk Nation
Council of Chiefs) provided additional
lines of evidence.
Through ongoing consultation with
Native American groups and Lauren
French, examination of the human
remains, and review of the available
literature, officials of St. Lawrence
University have determined that the
human remains are Native American
and most likely share common
Iroquoian identity with the Cayuga
Nation of New York; Oneida Nation of
New York; Oneida Tribe of Indians of
Wisconsin; Onondaga Nation of New
York; and the Mohawks of Akwesasne
(which is composed of the Saint Regis
Mohawk Tribe, New York; Mohawk
Council of Akwesasne; and Mohawk
Nation Council of Chiefs).
Officials of the St. Lawrence
University, Department of Anthropology
have determined that, pursuant to 25
U.S.C. 3001 (9–10), the human remains
described above represents the physical
remains of one individual of Native
American ancestry. Officials of the St.
Lawrence University, Department of
Anthropology have determined that,
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is
a relationship of shared group identity
that can be reasonably traced between
the Native American human remains
and the Cayuga Nation of New York;
Oneida Nation of New York; Oneida
Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin;
Onondaga Nation of New York; and
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York.
Lastly, officials of the St. Lawrence
University, Department of Anthropology
have determined that there is a cultural
relationship between the human
remains and the Mohawk Council of
Akwesasne and Mohawk Nation
Council of Chiefs.
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jul 31, 2009
Jkt 217001
should contact Dr. Richard A. Gonzalez,
Department of Anthropology, St.
Lawrence University, Canton, NY
13617, telephone (315) 229–5745, before
September 2, 2009. Repatriation of the
human remains to the Cayuga Nation of
New York; Oneida Nation of New York;
Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin;
Onondaga Nation of New York; and
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York
(which also represents the Mohawk
Council of Akwesasne and the Mohawk
Nation Council of Chiefs), may proceed
after that date if no additional claimants
come forward.
St. Lawrence University is responsible
for notifying the Cayuga Nation of New
York; Oneida Nation of New York;
Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin;
Onondaga Nation of New York; Saint
Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York;
Mohawk Council of Akwesasne; and
Mohawk Nation Council of Chiefs that
this notice has been published.
Dated: July 14, 2009.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. E9–17666 Filed 7–31–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–M
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–208 (Third
Review)]
Barbed Wire and Barbless Wire Strand
From Argentina
AGENCY: United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of a five-year review
concerning the antidumping duty order
on barbed wire and barbless wire strand
from Argentina.
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted a review
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act)
to determine whether revocation of the
antidumping duty order on barbed wire
and barbless wire strand from Argentina
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury.
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act,
interested parties are requested to
respond to this notice by submitting the
information specified below to the
Commission; 1 to be assured of
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 09–5–202,
expiration date June 30, 2011. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 15
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
consideration, the deadline for
responses is September 2, 2009.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission by
October 19, 2009. For further
information concerning the conduct of
this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207), as most recently
amended at 74 FR 2847 (January 16,
2009).
DATES:
Effective Date: August 3, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On November 13, 1985,
the Department of Commerce issued an
antidumping duty order on imports of
barbed wire and barbless wire strand
from Argentina (50 FR 46808).
Following five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission,
effective May 12, 1999, Commerce
issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
barbed wire and barbless fencing wire
from Argentina (64 FR 42653).
Following second five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission,
effective September 20, 2004, Commerce
issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
barbed wire and barbless fencing wire
from Argentina (69 FR 56190). The
Commission is now conducting a third
review to determine whether revocation
of the order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to the domestic industry within
a reasonably foreseeable time. It will
assess the adequacy of interested party
responses to this notice of institution to
determine whether to conduct a full
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436.
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 147 (Monday, August 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38467-38468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17666]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Inventory Completion: St. Lawrence University,
Department of Anthropology, Canton, NY; Correction
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the
completion of an inventory of human remains in the possession of St.
Lawrence University, Department of Anthropology, Canton, NY. The human
remains were removed from St. Lawrence County, NY.
This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's
administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3).
The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the
museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the Native
American human remains. The National Park Service is not responsible
for the determinations in this notice.
This notice corrects the number of tribes that were determined to
be culturally affiliated in a Notice of Inventory Completion previously
published in the Federal Register (73 FR 50996-50997, August 29, 2008)
by adding the Oneida, Cayuga, and Onondaga Indian Nations, in addition
to the Mohawk Nation. After publication, St. Lawrence University
determined that the Oneida, Mohawk, Cayuga, and Onondaga Nations are
all culturally affiliated with the Native American human remains, which
are currently in the possession of the Department of Anthropology, St.
Lawrence University.
In the Federal Register of August 29, 2008, paragraph numbers 6-10
are corrected by substituting the following:
The region of Gouverneur has been occupied by Native Americans from
10,000 BP up to the historic period and
[[Page 38468]]
beyond. The St. Lawrence River and its tributaries were continually
used as part of Native American hunting and fishing grounds. During the
French and Indian War, Native Americans who occupied the Oswegatchie
River region (Oswegatchie is a tributary of the St. Lawrence River),
which included the Oneida, Mohawk, Cayuga, and Onondaga, were
dislocated as a result of the war. Many Native Americans were forced to
abandon their settlements, which included the abandonment of La
Presentation in 1759. Many Iroquoian families were forced to migrate to
present-day St. Regis where they were adopted by the Mohawk.
Consultation with tribal representatives of the Mohawks of Akwesasne
(which is composed of the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York; Mohawk
Council of Akwesasne; and Mohawk Nation Council of Chiefs) provided
additional lines of evidence.
Through ongoing consultation with Native American groups and Lauren
French, examination of the human remains, and review of the available
literature, officials of St. Lawrence University have determined that
the human remains are Native American and most likely share common
Iroquoian identity with the Cayuga Nation of New York; Oneida Nation of
New York; Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin; Onondaga Nation of New
York; and the Mohawks of Akwesasne (which is composed of the Saint
Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York; Mohawk Council of Akwesasne; and Mohawk
Nation Council of Chiefs).
Officials of the St. Lawrence University, Department of
Anthropology have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9-10),
the human remains described above represents the physical remains of
one individual of Native American ancestry. Officials of the St.
Lawrence University, Department of Anthropology have determined that,
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a relationship of shared group
identity that can be reasonably traced between the Native American
human remains and the Cayuga Nation of New York; Oneida Nation of New
York; Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin; Onondaga Nation of New
York; and Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York. Lastly, officials of the
St. Lawrence University, Department of Anthropology have determined
that there is a cultural relationship between the human remains and the
Mohawk Council of Akwesasne and Mohawk Nation Council of Chiefs.
Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to
be culturally affiliated with the human remains should contact Dr.
Richard A. Gonzalez, Department of Anthropology, St. Lawrence
University, Canton, NY 13617, telephone (315) 229-5745, before
September 2, 2009. Repatriation of the human remains to the Cayuga
Nation of New York; Oneida Nation of New York; Oneida Tribe of Indians
of Wisconsin; Onondaga Nation of New York; and Saint Regis Mohawk
Tribe, New York (which also represents the Mohawk Council of Akwesasne
and the Mohawk Nation Council of Chiefs), may proceed after that date
if no additional claimants come forward.
St. Lawrence University is responsible for notifying the Cayuga
Nation of New York; Oneida Nation of New York; Oneida Tribe of Indians
of Wisconsin; Onondaga Nation of New York; Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe,
New York; Mohawk Council of Akwesasne; and Mohawk Nation Council of
Chiefs that this notice has been published.
Dated: July 14, 2009.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. E9-17666 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-50-M