Suspension of Running of Period of Limitations During a Proceeding To Enforce or Quash a Designated or Related Summons, 38095-38098 [E9-18380]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 146 / Friday, July 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
landing any marine life species, or part
thereof, within the Sanctuary, except in
accordance with rules 68B–42 of the
Florida Administrative Code, and such
rules shall apply mutatis mutandis
(with necessary editorial changes) to all
Federal and State waters within the
Sanctuary.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Notwithstanding the prohibitions
in this section and in § 922.164, and any
access and use restrictions imposed
pursuant thereto, a person may conduct
an activity specifically authorized by
any valid Federal, State, or local lease,
permit, license, approval, or other
authorization issued after the effective
date of these regulations, provided that
the applicant complies with § 922.49,
the Director notifies the applicant and
authorizing agency that he or she does
not object to issuance of the
authorization, and the applicant
complies with any terms and conditions
the Director deems reasonably necessary
to protect Sanctuary resources and
qualities. Amendments, renewals and
extensions of authorizations in
existence on the effective date of these
regulations constitute authorizations
issued after the effective date of these
regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 922.164 in paragraph (d)
by revising the heading and paragraph
(d)(1) introductory text; and in
paragraph (e) by adding paragraph (e)(5)
to read as follows:
§ 922.164 Additional activity regulations
by Sanctuary area.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Ecological Reserves, Sanctuary
Preservation Areas, and Special Use
(Research only) Areas. (1) The following
activities are prohibited within the
Ecological Reserves described in
Appendix IV to this subpart, within the
Sanctuary Preservation Areas described
in Appendix V to this subpart, and
within the Special Use (Research only
Areas) described in Appendix VI to this
subpart:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(5) In addition to paragraph (e)(3) of
this section no person shall conduct
activities listed in paragraph (d) of this
section in ‘‘Research-only Areas.’’
■ 5. Remove and reserve § 922.168.
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
§ 922.168
[Removed and reserved]
6. Remove Appendix VIII to Subpart
P of Part 922—Marine Life Rule [As
Excerpted from Chapter 46–42 of the
Florida Administrative Code].
■
[FR Doc. E9–17825 Filed 7–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:21 Jul 30, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9455]
RIN 1545–BC55
Suspension of Running of Period of
Limitations During a Proceeding To
Enforce or Quash a Designated or
Related Summons
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains final
regulations regarding the use of
designated summonses and related
summonses and the effect on the period
of limitations on assessment when a
case is brought with respect to a
designated or related summons. These
final regulations reflect changes to
section 6503 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 made by the Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 and
the Small Business Job Protection Act of
1996. These final regulations affect
corporate taxpayers that are examined
under the coordinated industry case
(CIC) program and are served with
designated or related summonses. These
final regulations also affect third parties
that are served with designated or
related summonses for information
pertaining to the corporate examination.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on July 31, 2009.
Applicability Date: For the date of
applicability, see § 301.6503(j)–1(e).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Rawlins, (202) 622–3620 (not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains final
regulations amending the Procedure and
Administration regulations (26 CFR part
301) under section 6503. Section 11311
of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation
Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101–508, 104 Stat.
1388) amended section 6503(k) to
suspend the period of limitations on
assessment when a case is brought with
respect to a designated or related
summons. Section 6503(k) was
redesignated as section 6503(j) by
section 1702(h)(17)(A) of the Small
Business Job Protection Act of 1996
(Pub. L. 104–188, 110 Stat. 1874).
On April 28, 2008, the IRS published
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–208199–91;
73 FR 22879), interpreting section
6503(j) and withdrawing a prior notice
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38095
of proposed rulemaking, hereinafter
referred to as the 2003 proposed
regulations, published in the Federal
Register on July 31, 2003 (68 FR 44905).
Written comments from one
commentator were received. No request
for a public hearing was received, nor
was one held. The proposed regulations
are adopted as final regulations with
one minor clarifying change.
As described more fully in the
preamble to the proposed regulations,
these regulations generally provide that
the period of limitations on assessment
provided for in section 6501 is
suspended with respect to any return of
tax by a corporation that is the subject
of a designated or related summons if a
court proceeding to enforce or quash is
instituted with respect to that summons.
These final regulations define a
designated summons, a related
summons, and the period of suspension.
The final regulations also provide
guidance regarding the component
concepts of judicial enforcement period,
court proceeding, the date when the
proceeding is no longer pending, final
resolution, compliance, and the date
when compliance occurs. These
regulations also provide special rules on
the number of designated and related
summonses that may be issued, the time
within which court proceedings must be
brought to suspend the period of
limitations on assessment, the
computation of the suspension period if
multiple court proceedings are
instituted, the effect on the suspension
provisions under section 7609(e), and
the application of section 7503 when
the last day of an assessment period
falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal
holiday.
Comments on the Proposed Regulations
§ 301.6503(j)–1(c)(5)(ii)—Date
Compliance Occurs
Proposed § 301.6503(j)–1(c)(5)(ii)
provides, in pertinent part, that
‘‘[c]ompliance with a court order that
grants enforcement, in whole or in part,
of a designated or related summons,
occurs on the date it is determined that
the testimony given, or the books,
papers, records, or other data produced,
or both, by the summoned party fully
satisfy the court order concerning the
summons. The determination of
whether there has been full compliance
will be made within a reasonable time,
given the volume and complexity of the
records produced, after the later of the
giving of all testimony or the production
of all records requested by the summons
or required by any order enforcing any
part of the summons.’’ The commentator
suggested that this provision be changed
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
38096
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 146 / Friday, July 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
to conform to the language appearing in
the 2003 proposed regulation, which in
pertinent part provides ‘‘[c]ompliance
with a court order that grants
enforcement * * * occurs on the date
the Commissioner or his delegate
(Commissioner) determines that * * *
the summoned party fully satisf[ied] the
court order * * *. The determination
whether there has been compliance will
be made as soon as practicable after the
testimony is given or the materials are
produced.’’ In particular, the
commentator recommended that the
phrase ‘‘as soon as practicable,’’ used in
the 2003 proposed regulations, be
substituted for the phrase ‘‘within a
reasonable time,’’ used in the 2008
proposed regulations. The commentator
indicated this suggestion was intended
to protect cooperative taxpayers from
uncertainty about the suspension of
their period of limitations.
This suggestion has not been adopted.
The 2008 proposed regulations identify
the facts and circumstances to which
the phrase ‘‘within a reasonable time’’ is
intended to relate, including whether a
determination is ‘‘practicable,’’ by
adding the phrase ‘‘given the volume
and complexity of the records
produced.’’ Moreover, the term
‘‘reasonable’’ is a term that is routinely
interpreted by the courts.
The commentator also expressed
concern over the 2008 proposed
regulatory phrase ‘‘it is determined,’’
appearing in the phrase ‘‘occurs on the
date it is determined that the testimony
given * * * or other data produced
* * * by the summoned party fully
satisfy the court order.’’ Although the
commentator did not expressly suggest
other language, the commentator did
note that the 2003 proposed regulations
had provided ‘‘the Commissioner or his
delegate determines’’ and expressed the
view that the 2008 phrase ‘‘it is
determined’’ is ambiguous and will
leave the taxpayer without guidance as
to who will actually make the
determination.
CIC corporate taxpayers and their tax
advisors are aware that the first point of
inquiry for any matter involving the
examination is the examination team
conducting the audit and the team’s
management and supervisory chain of
command. These are the persons who
will examine the summoned
information and, under Internal
Revenue Manual (IRM) procedures that
will be issued based on these
regulations, will decide whether the
summoned person’s production satisfies
the court’s order. The final regulations
amend the proposed regulations to
clarify this understanding and practice.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:21 Jul 30, 2009
Jkt 217001
Section 301.6503(j)–1(d)—Special Rules
Proposed § 301.6503(j)–1(d)(1)
through (5) provides several special
rules that apply to designated and
related summonses, such as the rule
limiting the number of designated
summonses that may be issued.
Proposed § 301.6503(j)–1(d) does not
include provisions appearing in the
2003 proposed regulations as
§ 301.6503(j)–1(d)(6) and (7), containing
a procedure whereby a summoned
person could request from the IRS a
determination that the summoned
person had fully complied with a
designated or related summons to the
extent required by court order.
According to this 2003 proposed
regulatory procedure, unless the
taxpayer’s request was responded to
timely, the summons would be treated
as having been fully complied with as
of the 180th day. This proposed
procedure was not included in the 2008
proposed regulations.
The commentator suggested that this
provision be revised to include 2003
proposed § 301.6503(j)–1(d)(6) and (7),
with one modification. The
commentator suggested that the ‘‘fully
complied with’’ procedure be reinstated
and that a new provision be added to
permit the taxpayer to request a ‘‘fully
complied with’’ determination in cases
where the summons was served on a
third party. The commentator suggested
that reinserting the procedure would
protect cooperative CIC taxpayers from
receiving unnecessary designated
summonses, assist CIC taxpayers in
knowing the date on which the
suspension terminates, and avoid
unnecessary litigation.
This commentator’s suggestion has
not been adopted. The final regulations
and existing extensive safeguard protect
cooperative CIC taxpayers from
receiving unnecessary designated
summonses. For example, pursuant to
section 1003 of the Taxpayer Bill of
Rights 2 of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–168, 110
Stat. 1468), Congress requires the
Treasury Department to report on an
annual basis the number of designated
summonses issued in the preceding
year. Also, pursuant to section
6503(j)(2)(A)(i), Congress requires
preissuance review by a high ranking
executive of the Office of Chief Counsel.
The IRS and these regulations require
preissuance review by both the Division
Counsel of the Office of Chief Counsel
and the Division Commissioner for the
organizations that have jurisdiction over
the corporate taxpayer. Additionally,
the Office of Chief Counsel requires that
the National Office provide preissuance
review of all designated summonses.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IRM 34.6.3.1(6)c. The public may access
the IRM at https://www.irs.gov/irm/
index.html. To obtain approval for the
issuance of a designated summons, the
issuing office must explain why the
corporate taxpayer refused to extend the
period of limitations on assessment, and
if the summons is to be issued near the
end of the period permitted by section
6503(j), the issuing office must explain
why the summons was not issued at an
earlier date. IRM 25.5.3.3(3)b. The
effectiveness of these safeguards is
evidenced by the IRS’s circumspect use
of the designated summons authority.
The IRS also will issue IRM
provisions that will include procedures
whereby the CIC taxpayer will be
promptly informed of whether the
production of summoned information
fully complies with the summons. The
IRM procedures depend on the issuance
of the interpretative rules in these
regulations, particularly the definition
of final resolution and compliance, and
cannot be published until these final
regulations are effective. Once these
regulations are effective, the IRM
procedures will be published. Moreover,
even without such IRM procedures, a
CIC taxpayer may ascertain when the
IRS determined full compliance and
when the suspension terminated by
contacting the examining agent.
The final regulations also effectively
prevent unnecessary litigation. In
addition to the extensive safeguards
discussed above, the IRS is committed
to examining the summoned
information and determining whether
the production satisfies the enforcement
order within a reasonable time given the
volume and complexity of the
information produced. The CIC taxpayer
may contact the IRS at any time to
inquire about the status of the
suspension.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this
Treasury decision is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
has been determined that section 553(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to this
regulation, and because the regulation
does not impose a collection of
information requirement on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f), the notice of
proposed rulemaking preceding this
final regulation was submitted to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 146 / Friday, July 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Elizabeth Rawlins of the
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel,
Procedure and Administration, Internal
Revenue Service.
Lists of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes,
Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
■ Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is
amended as follows:
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 301 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *.
Par. 2. Section 301.6503(j)–1 is added
to read as follows:
■
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
§ 301.6503(j)–1 Suspension of running of
period of limitations; extension in case of
designated and related summonses.
(a) General rule. The running of the
applicable period of limitations on
assessment provided for in section 6501
is suspended with respect to any return
of tax by a corporation that is the subject
of a designated or related summons if a
court proceeding is instituted with
respect to that summons.
(b) Period of suspension. The period
of suspension is the time during which
the running of the applicable period of
limitations on assessment provided for
in section 6501 is suspended under
section 6503(j). If a court requires any
compliance with a designated or related
summons by ordering that any record,
document, paper, object, or items be
produced, or the testimony of any
person be given, the period of
suspension consists of the judicial
enforcement period plus 120 days. If a
court does not require any compliance
with a designated or related summons,
the period of suspension consists of the
judicial enforcement period, and the
period of limitations on assessment
provided in section 6501 shall not
expire before the 60th day after the close
of the judicial enforcement period.
(c) Definitions—(1) A designated
summons is a summons issued to a
corporation (or to any other person to
whom the corporation has transferred
records) with respect to any return of
tax by such corporation for a taxable
period for which such corporation is
being examined under the coordinated
industry case program or any other
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:21 Jul 30, 2009
Jkt 217001
successor to the coordinated
examination program if—
(i) The Division Commissioner and
the Division Counsel of the Office of
Chief Counsel (or their successors) for
the organizations that have jurisdiction
over the corporation whose tax liability
is the subject of the summons have
reviewed the summons before it is
issued;
(ii) The Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) issues the summons at least 60
days before the day the period
prescribed in section 6501 for the
assessment of tax expires (determined
with regard to extensions); and
(iii) The summons states that it is a
designated summons for purposes of
section 6503(j).
(2) A related summons is any
summons issued that—
(i) Relates to the same return of the
corporation under examination as the
designated summons; and
(ii) Is issued to any person, including
the person to whom the designated
summons was issued, during the 30-day
period that begins on the day the
designated summons is issued.
(3) The judicial enforcement period is
the period that begins on the day on
which a court proceeding is instituted
with respect to a designated or related
summons and ends on the day on which
there is a final resolution as to the
summoned person’s response to that
summons.
(4) Court proceeding—(i) In general.
For purposes of this section, a court
proceeding is a proceeding filed in a
United States district court either to
quash a designated or related summons
under section 7609(b)(2) or to enforce a
designated or related summons under
section 7604. A court proceeding
includes any collateral proceeding, such
as a civil contempt proceeding.
(ii) Date when proceeding is no longer
pending. A proceeding to quash or to
enforce a designated or related
summons is no longer pending when all
appeals (including review by the
Supreme Court) are disposed of or after
the expiration of the period in which an
appeal may be taken or a request for
further review (including review by the
Supreme Court) may be made. If,
however, following an enforcement
order, a collateral proceeding is brought
challenging whether the testimony
given or production made by the
summoned party fully satisfied the
court order and whether sanctions
should be imposed against the
summoned party for a failure to so
testify or produce, the proceeding to
quash or to enforce the summons shall
include the time from which the
proceeding to quash or to enforce the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38097
summons was brought until the
decision in the collateral proceeding
becomes final. The decision becomes
final on the date when all appeals
(including review by the Supreme
Court) are disposed of or when all
appeal periods or all periods for further
review (including review by the
Supreme Court) expire. A decision in a
collateral proceeding becomes final
when all appeals (including review by
the Supreme Court) are disposed of or
when all appeal periods or all periods
for further review (including review by
the Supreme Court) expire.
(5) Compliance—(i) In general.
Compliance is the giving of testimony or
the performance of an act or acts of
production, or both, in response to a
court order concerning the designated or
related summons and the determination
that the terms of the court order have
been satisfied.
(ii) Date compliance occurs.
Compliance with a court order that
wholly denies enforcement of a
designated or related summons is
deemed to occur on the date when all
appeals (including review by the
Supreme Court) are disposed of or when
the period in which an appeal may be
taken or a request for further review
(including review by the Supreme
Court) may be made expires.
Compliance with a court order that
grants enforcement, in whole or in part,
of a designated or related summons,
occurs on the date the IRS determines
that the testimony given, or the books,
papers, records, or other data produced,
or both, by the summoned party fully
satisfy the court order concerning the
summons. The IRS will determine
whether there has been full compliance
within a reasonable time, given the
volume and complexity of the records
produced, after the later of the giving of
all testimony or the production of all
records requested by the summons or
required by any order enforcing any part
of the summons. If, following an
enforcement order, collateral
proceedings are brought challenging
whether the production made by the
summoned party fully satisfied the
court order and whether sanctions
should be imposed against the
summoned party for a failing to do so,
the suspension of the periods of
limitations shall continue until the
order enforcing any part of the
summons is fully complied with and the
decision in the collateral proceeding
becomes final. A decision in a collateral
proceeding becomes final when all
appeals are disposed of, the period in
which an appeal may be taken has
expired or the period in which a request
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
38098
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 146 / Friday, July 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
for further review may be made has
expired.
(6) Final resolution occurs when the
designated or related summons or any
order enforcing any part of the
designated or related summons is fully
complied with and all appeals or
requests for further review are disposed
of, the period in which an appeal may
be taken has expired or the period in
which a request for further review may
be made has expired.
(d) Special rules—(1) Number of
summonses that may be issued—(i)
Designated summons. Only one
designated summons may be issued in
connection with the examination of a
specific taxable year or other period of
a corporation. A designated summons
may cover more than one year or other
period of a corporation. The designated
summons may require production of
information that was previously sought
in a summons (other than a designated
summons) issued in the course of the
examination of that particular
corporation if that information was not
previously produced.
(ii) Related summonses. There is no
restriction on the number of related
summonses that may be issued in
connection with the examination of a
corporation. As provided in paragraph
(c)(2) of this section, however, a related
summons must be issued within the 30day period that begins on the date on
which the designated summons to
which it relates is issued and must
relate to the same return as the
designated summons. A related
summons may request the same
information as the designated summons.
(2) Time within which court
proceedings must be brought. In order
for the period of limitations on
assessment to be suspended under
section 6503(j), a court proceeding to
enforce or to quash a designated or
related summons must be instituted
within the period of limitations on
assessment provided in section 6501
that is otherwise applicable to the tax
return.
(3) Computation of suspension period
if multiple court proceedings are
instituted. If multiple court proceedings
are instituted to enforce or to quash a
designated or one or more related
summonses concerning the same tax
return, the period of limitations on
assessment is suspended beginning on
the date the first court proceeding is
brought. The suspension shall end on
the date that is the latest date on which
the judicial enforcement period, plus
the 120 day or 60 day period (depending
on whether the court requires any
compliance) as provided in paragraph
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:21 Jul 30, 2009
Jkt 217001
(b) of this section, expires with respect
to each summons.
(4) Effect on other suspension
periods—(i) In general. Suspensions of
the period of limitations under section
6501 provided for under subsections
7609(e)(1) and (e)(2) do not apply to any
summons that is issued pursuant to
section 6503(j). The suspension under
section 6503(j) of the running of the
period of limitations on assessment
under section 6501 is independent of,
and may run concurrent with, any other
suspension of the period of limitations
on assessment that applies to the tax
return to which the designated or
related summons relates.
(ii) Examples. The rules of paragraph
(d)(4)(i) of this section are illustrated by
the following examples:
Example 1. The period of limitations on
assessment against Corporation P, a calendar
year taxpayer, for its 2007 return is
scheduled to end on March 17, 2011.
(Ordinarily, Corporation P’s returns are filed
on March 15th of the following year, but
March 15, 2008, was a Saturday, and
Corporation P timely filed its return on the
subsequent Monday, March 17, 2008, making
March 17, 2011 the last day of the period of
limitations on assessment for Corporation P’s
2007 tax year.) On January 4, 2011, a
designated summons is issued to Corporation
P concerning its 2007 return. On March 3,
2011 (14 days before the period of limitations
on assessment would otherwise expire with
respect to Corporation P’s 2007 return), a
court proceeding is brought to enforce the
designated summons issued to Corporation P.
On June 6, 2011, the court orders Corporation
P to comply with the designated summons.
Corporation P does not appeal the court’s
order. On September 6, 2011, agents for
Corporation P deliver material that they state
are the records requested by the designated
summons. On October 13, 2011, a final
resolution to Corporation P’s response to the
designated summons occurs when it is
determined that Corporation P has fully
complied with the court’s order. The
suspension period applicable with respect to
the designated summons issued to
Corporation P consists of the judicial
enforcement period (March 3, 2011, through
October 13, 2011) and an additional 120-day
period under section 6503(j)(1)(B), because
the court required Corporation P to comply
with the designated summons. Thus, the
suspension period applicable with respect to
the designated summons issued to
Corporation P begins on March 3, 2011, and
ends on February 10, 2012. Under the facts
of this Example 1, the period of limitations
on assessment against Corporation P further
extends to February 24, 2012, to account for
the additional 14 days that remained on the
period of limitations on assessment under
section 6501 when the suspension period
under section 6503(j) began.
Example 2. Assume the same facts set forth
in Example 1, except that in addition to the
issuance of the designated summons and
related enforcement proceedings, on April 5,
2011, a summons concerning Corporation P’s
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2007 return is issued and served on
individual A, a third party. This summons is
not a related summons because it was not
issued during the 30-day period that began
on the date the designated summons was
issued. The third-party summons served on
individual A is subject to the notice
requirements of section 7609(a). Final
resolution of individual A’s response to this
summons does not occur until February 15,
2012. Because there is no final resolution of
individual A’s response to this summons by
October 5, 2011, which is six months from
the date of service of the summons, the
period of limitations on assessment against
Corporation P is suspended under section
7609(e)(2) to the date on which there is a
final resolution to that response for the
purposes of section 7609(e)(2). Moreover,
because final resolution to the summons
served on individual A does not occur until
after February 10, 2012, the end of the
suspension period for the designated
summons, the period of limitations on
assessment against Corporation P expires 14
days after the date that the final resolution
as provided for in section 7609(e)(2) occurs
with respect to the summons served on
individual A.
(5) Computation of 60-day period
when last day of assessment period falls
on a weekend or holiday. For purposes
of paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, in
determining whether a designated
summons has been issued at least 60
days before the date on which the
period of limitations on assessment
prescribed in section 6501 expires, the
provisions of section 7503 apply when
the last day of the assessment period
falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal
holiday.
(e) Effective/applicability date. This
section is applicable on July 31, 2009.
Approved: July 15, 2009.
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Michael Mundaca,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
(Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. E9–18380 Filed 7–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3020
[Docket Nos. MC2009–30 and CP2009–40;
Order No. 247]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document informs the
public that the Commission has
reviewed and approved the Postal
Service’s recent request to add a new
Priority Mail product to the Competitive
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 146 (Friday, July 31, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38095-38098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18380]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9455]
RIN 1545-BC55
Suspension of Running of Period of Limitations During a
Proceeding To Enforce or Quash a Designated or Related Summons
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations regarding the use of
designated summonses and related summonses and the effect on the period
of limitations on assessment when a case is brought with respect to a
designated or related summons. These final regulations reflect changes
to section 6503 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 made by the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 and the Small Business Job
Protection Act of 1996. These final regulations affect corporate
taxpayers that are examined under the coordinated industry case (CIC)
program and are served with designated or related summonses. These
final regulations also affect third parties that are served with
designated or related summonses for information pertaining to the
corporate examination.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on July 31,
2009.
Applicability Date: For the date of applicability, see Sec.
301.6503(j)-1(e).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Rawlins, (202) 622-3620 (not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains final regulations amending the Procedure and
Administration regulations (26 CFR part 301) under section 6503.
Section 11311 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Pub. L.
101-508, 104 Stat. 1388) amended section 6503(k) to suspend the period
of limitations on assessment when a case is brought with respect to a
designated or related summons. Section 6503(k) was redesignated as
section 6503(j) by section 1702(h)(17)(A) of the Small Business Job
Protection Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-188, 110 Stat. 1874).
On April 28, 2008, the IRS published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-208199-91; 73 FR 22879),
interpreting section 6503(j) and withdrawing a prior notice of proposed
rulemaking, hereinafter referred to as the 2003 proposed regulations,
published in the Federal Register on July 31, 2003 (68 FR 44905).
Written comments from one commentator were received. No request for a
public hearing was received, nor was one held. The proposed regulations
are adopted as final regulations with one minor clarifying change.
As described more fully in the preamble to the proposed
regulations, these regulations generally provide that the period of
limitations on assessment provided for in section 6501 is suspended
with respect to any return of tax by a corporation that is the subject
of a designated or related summons if a court proceeding to enforce or
quash is instituted with respect to that summons. These final
regulations define a designated summons, a related summons, and the
period of suspension. The final regulations also provide guidance
regarding the component concepts of judicial enforcement period, court
proceeding, the date when the proceeding is no longer pending, final
resolution, compliance, and the date when compliance occurs. These
regulations also provide special rules on the number of designated and
related summonses that may be issued, the time within which court
proceedings must be brought to suspend the period of limitations on
assessment, the computation of the suspension period if multiple court
proceedings are instituted, the effect on the suspension provisions
under section 7609(e), and the application of section 7503 when the
last day of an assessment period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal
holiday.
Comments on the Proposed Regulations
Sec. 301.6503(j)-1(c)(5)(ii)--Date Compliance Occurs
Proposed Sec. 301.6503(j)-1(c)(5)(ii) provides, in pertinent part,
that ``[c]ompliance with a court order that grants enforcement, in
whole or in part, of a designated or related summons, occurs on the
date it is determined that the testimony given, or the books, papers,
records, or other data produced, or both, by the summoned party fully
satisfy the court order concerning the summons. The determination of
whether there has been full compliance will be made within a reasonable
time, given the volume and complexity of the records produced, after
the later of the giving of all testimony or the production of all
records requested by the summons or required by any order enforcing any
part of the summons.'' The commentator suggested that this provision be
changed
[[Page 38096]]
to conform to the language appearing in the 2003 proposed regulation,
which in pertinent part provides ``[c]ompliance with a court order that
grants enforcement * * * occurs on the date the Commissioner or his
delegate (Commissioner) determines that * * * the summoned party fully
satisf[ied] the court order * * *. The determination whether there has
been compliance will be made as soon as practicable after the testimony
is given or the materials are produced.'' In particular, the
commentator recommended that the phrase ``as soon as practicable,''
used in the 2003 proposed regulations, be substituted for the phrase
``within a reasonable time,'' used in the 2008 proposed regulations.
The commentator indicated this suggestion was intended to protect
cooperative taxpayers from uncertainty about the suspension of their
period of limitations.
This suggestion has not been adopted. The 2008 proposed regulations
identify the facts and circumstances to which the phrase ``within a
reasonable time'' is intended to relate, including whether a
determination is ``practicable,'' by adding the phrase ``given the
volume and complexity of the records produced.'' Moreover, the term
``reasonable'' is a term that is routinely interpreted by the courts.
The commentator also expressed concern over the 2008 proposed
regulatory phrase ``it is determined,'' appearing in the phrase
``occurs on the date it is determined that the testimony given * * * or
other data produced * * * by the summoned party fully satisfy the court
order.'' Although the commentator did not expressly suggest other
language, the commentator did note that the 2003 proposed regulations
had provided ``the Commissioner or his delegate determines'' and
expressed the view that the 2008 phrase ``it is determined'' is
ambiguous and will leave the taxpayer without guidance as to who will
actually make the determination.
CIC corporate taxpayers and their tax advisors are aware that the
first point of inquiry for any matter involving the examination is the
examination team conducting the audit and the team's management and
supervisory chain of command. These are the persons who will examine
the summoned information and, under Internal Revenue Manual (IRM)
procedures that will be issued based on these regulations, will decide
whether the summoned person's production satisfies the court's order.
The final regulations amend the proposed regulations to clarify this
understanding and practice.
Section 301.6503(j)-1(d)--Special Rules
Proposed Sec. 301.6503(j)-1(d)(1) through (5) provides several
special rules that apply to designated and related summonses, such as
the rule limiting the number of designated summonses that may be
issued. Proposed Sec. 301.6503(j)-1(d) does not include provisions
appearing in the 2003 proposed regulations as Sec. 301.6503(j)-1(d)(6)
and (7), containing a procedure whereby a summoned person could request
from the IRS a determination that the summoned person had fully
complied with a designated or related summons to the extent required by
court order. According to this 2003 proposed regulatory procedure,
unless the taxpayer's request was responded to timely, the summons
would be treated as having been fully complied with as of the 180th
day. This proposed procedure was not included in the 2008 proposed
regulations.
The commentator suggested that this provision be revised to include
2003 proposed Sec. 301.6503(j)-1(d)(6) and (7), with one modification.
The commentator suggested that the ``fully complied with'' procedure be
reinstated and that a new provision be added to permit the taxpayer to
request a ``fully complied with'' determination in cases where the
summons was served on a third party. The commentator suggested that
reinserting the procedure would protect cooperative CIC taxpayers from
receiving unnecessary designated summonses, assist CIC taxpayers in
knowing the date on which the suspension terminates, and avoid
unnecessary litigation.
This commentator's suggestion has not been adopted. The final
regulations and existing extensive safeguard protect cooperative CIC
taxpayers from receiving unnecessary designated summonses. For example,
pursuant to section 1003 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2 of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104-168, 110 Stat. 1468), Congress requires the Treasury Department
to report on an annual basis the number of designated summonses issued
in the preceding year. Also, pursuant to section 6503(j)(2)(A)(i),
Congress requires preissuance review by a high ranking executive of the
Office of Chief Counsel. The IRS and these regulations require
preissuance review by both the Division Counsel of the Office of Chief
Counsel and the Division Commissioner for the organizations that have
jurisdiction over the corporate taxpayer. Additionally, the Office of
Chief Counsel requires that the National Office provide preissuance
review of all designated summonses. IRM 34.6.3.1(6)c. The public may
access the IRM at https://www.irs.gov/irm/. To obtain approval
for the issuance of a designated summons, the issuing office must
explain why the corporate taxpayer refused to extend the period of
limitations on assessment, and if the summons is to be issued near the
end of the period permitted by section 6503(j), the issuing office must
explain why the summons was not issued at an earlier date. IRM
25.5.3.3(3)b. The effectiveness of these safeguards is evidenced by the
IRS's circumspect use of the designated summons authority.
The IRS also will issue IRM provisions that will include procedures
whereby the CIC taxpayer will be promptly informed of whether the
production of summoned information fully complies with the summons. The
IRM procedures depend on the issuance of the interpretative rules in
these regulations, particularly the definition of final resolution and
compliance, and cannot be published until these final regulations are
effective. Once these regulations are effective, the IRM procedures
will be published. Moreover, even without such IRM procedures, a CIC
taxpayer may ascertain when the IRS determined full compliance and when
the suspension terminated by contacting the examining agent.
The final regulations also effectively prevent unnecessary
litigation. In addition to the extensive safeguards discussed above,
the IRS is committed to examining the summoned information and
determining whether the production satisfies the enforcement order
within a reasonable time given the volume and complexity of the
information produced. The CIC taxpayer may contact the IRS at any time
to inquire about the status of the suspension.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866.
Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has been
determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to this regulation, and because the
regulation does not impose a collection of information requirement on
small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6)
does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f), the notice of proposed
rulemaking preceding this final regulation was submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
[[Page 38097]]
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Elizabeth Rawlins of
the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel, Procedure and
Administration, Internal Revenue Service.
Lists of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
0
Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is amended as follows:
PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *.
0
Par. 2. Section 301.6503(j)-1 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 301.6503(j)-1 Suspension of running of period of limitations;
extension in case of designated and related summonses.
(a) General rule. The running of the applicable period of
limitations on assessment provided for in section 6501 is suspended
with respect to any return of tax by a corporation that is the subject
of a designated or related summons if a court proceeding is instituted
with respect to that summons.
(b) Period of suspension. The period of suspension is the time
during which the running of the applicable period of limitations on
assessment provided for in section 6501 is suspended under section
6503(j). If a court requires any compliance with a designated or
related summons by ordering that any record, document, paper, object,
or items be produced, or the testimony of any person be given, the
period of suspension consists of the judicial enforcement period plus
120 days. If a court does not require any compliance with a designated
or related summons, the period of suspension consists of the judicial
enforcement period, and the period of limitations on assessment
provided in section 6501 shall not expire before the 60th day after the
close of the judicial enforcement period.
(c) Definitions--(1) A designated summons is a summons issued to a
corporation (or to any other person to whom the corporation has
transferred records) with respect to any return of tax by such
corporation for a taxable period for which such corporation is being
examined under the coordinated industry case program or any other
successor to the coordinated examination program if--
(i) The Division Commissioner and the Division Counsel of the
Office of Chief Counsel (or their successors) for the organizations
that have jurisdiction over the corporation whose tax liability is the
subject of the summons have reviewed the summons before it is issued;
(ii) The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issues the summons at least
60 days before the day the period prescribed in section 6501 for the
assessment of tax expires (determined with regard to extensions); and
(iii) The summons states that it is a designated summons for
purposes of section 6503(j).
(2) A related summons is any summons issued that--
(i) Relates to the same return of the corporation under examination
as the designated summons; and
(ii) Is issued to any person, including the person to whom the
designated summons was issued, during the 30-day period that begins on
the day the designated summons is issued.
(3) The judicial enforcement period is the period that begins on
the day on which a court proceeding is instituted with respect to a
designated or related summons and ends on the day on which there is a
final resolution as to the summoned person's response to that summons.
(4) Court proceeding--(i) In general. For purposes of this section,
a court proceeding is a proceeding filed in a United States district
court either to quash a designated or related summons under section
7609(b)(2) or to enforce a designated or related summons under section
7604. A court proceeding includes any collateral proceeding, such as a
civil contempt proceeding.
(ii) Date when proceeding is no longer pending. A proceeding to
quash or to enforce a designated or related summons is no longer
pending when all appeals (including review by the Supreme Court) are
disposed of or after the expiration of the period in which an appeal
may be taken or a request for further review (including review by the
Supreme Court) may be made. If, however, following an enforcement
order, a collateral proceeding is brought challenging whether the
testimony given or production made by the summoned party fully
satisfied the court order and whether sanctions should be imposed
against the summoned party for a failure to so testify or produce, the
proceeding to quash or to enforce the summons shall include the time
from which the proceeding to quash or to enforce the summons was
brought until the decision in the collateral proceeding becomes final.
The decision becomes final on the date when all appeals (including
review by the Supreme Court) are disposed of or when all appeal periods
or all periods for further review (including review by the Supreme
Court) expire. A decision in a collateral proceeding becomes final when
all appeals (including review by the Supreme Court) are disposed of or
when all appeal periods or all periods for further review (including
review by the Supreme Court) expire.
(5) Compliance--(i) In general. Compliance is the giving of
testimony or the performance of an act or acts of production, or both,
in response to a court order concerning the designated or related
summons and the determination that the terms of the court order have
been satisfied.
(ii) Date compliance occurs. Compliance with a court order that
wholly denies enforcement of a designated or related summons is deemed
to occur on the date when all appeals (including review by the Supreme
Court) are disposed of or when the period in which an appeal may be
taken or a request for further review (including review by the Supreme
Court) may be made expires. Compliance with a court order that grants
enforcement, in whole or in part, of a designated or related summons,
occurs on the date the IRS determines that the testimony given, or the
books, papers, records, or other data produced, or both, by the
summoned party fully satisfy the court order concerning the summons.
The IRS will determine whether there has been full compliance within a
reasonable time, given the volume and complexity of the records
produced, after the later of the giving of all testimony or the
production of all records requested by the summons or required by any
order enforcing any part of the summons. If, following an enforcement
order, collateral proceedings are brought challenging whether the
production made by the summoned party fully satisfied the court order
and whether sanctions should be imposed against the summoned party for
a failing to do so, the suspension of the periods of limitations shall
continue until the order enforcing any part of the summons is fully
complied with and the decision in the collateral proceeding becomes
final. A decision in a collateral proceeding becomes final when all
appeals are disposed of, the period in which an appeal may be taken has
expired or the period in which a request
[[Page 38098]]
for further review may be made has expired.
(6) Final resolution occurs when the designated or related summons
or any order enforcing any part of the designated or related summons is
fully complied with and all appeals or requests for further review are
disposed of, the period in which an appeal may be taken has expired or
the period in which a request for further review may be made has
expired.
(d) Special rules--(1) Number of summonses that may be issued--(i)
Designated summons. Only one designated summons may be issued in
connection with the examination of a specific taxable year or other
period of a corporation. A designated summons may cover more than one
year or other period of a corporation. The designated summons may
require production of information that was previously sought in a
summons (other than a designated summons) issued in the course of the
examination of that particular corporation if that information was not
previously produced.
(ii) Related summonses. There is no restriction on the number of
related summonses that may be issued in connection with the examination
of a corporation. As provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section,
however, a related summons must be issued within the 30-day period that
begins on the date on which the designated summons to which it relates
is issued and must relate to the same return as the designated summons.
A related summons may request the same information as the designated
summons.
(2) Time within which court proceedings must be brought. In order
for the period of limitations on assessment to be suspended under
section 6503(j), a court proceeding to enforce or to quash a designated
or related summons must be instituted within the period of limitations
on assessment provided in section 6501 that is otherwise applicable to
the tax return.
(3) Computation of suspension period if multiple court proceedings
are instituted. If multiple court proceedings are instituted to enforce
or to quash a designated or one or more related summonses concerning
the same tax return, the period of limitations on assessment is
suspended beginning on the date the first court proceeding is brought.
The suspension shall end on the date that is the latest date on which
the judicial enforcement period, plus the 120 day or 60 day period
(depending on whether the court requires any compliance) as provided in
paragraph (b) of this section, expires with respect to each summons.
(4) Effect on other suspension periods--(i) In general. Suspensions
of the period of limitations under section 6501 provided for under
subsections 7609(e)(1) and (e)(2) do not apply to any summons that is
issued pursuant to section 6503(j). The suspension under section
6503(j) of the running of the period of limitations on assessment under
section 6501 is independent of, and may run concurrent with, any other
suspension of the period of limitations on assessment that applies to
the tax return to which the designated or related summons relates.
(ii) Examples. The rules of paragraph (d)(4)(i) of this section are
illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. The period of limitations on assessment against
Corporation P, a calendar year taxpayer, for its 2007 return is
scheduled to end on March 17, 2011. (Ordinarily, Corporation P's
returns are filed on March 15th of the following year, but March 15,
2008, was a Saturday, and Corporation P timely filed its return on
the subsequent Monday, March 17, 2008, making March 17, 2011 the
last day of the period of limitations on assessment for Corporation
P's 2007 tax year.) On January 4, 2011, a designated summons is
issued to Corporation P concerning its 2007 return. On March 3, 2011
(14 days before the period of limitations on assessment would
otherwise expire with respect to Corporation P's 2007 return), a
court proceeding is brought to enforce the designated summons issued
to Corporation P. On June 6, 2011, the court orders Corporation P to
comply with the designated summons. Corporation P does not appeal
the court's order. On September 6, 2011, agents for Corporation P
deliver material that they state are the records requested by the
designated summons. On October 13, 2011, a final resolution to
Corporation P's response to the designated summons occurs when it is
determined that Corporation P has fully complied with the court's
order. The suspension period applicable with respect to the
designated summons issued to Corporation P consists of the judicial
enforcement period (March 3, 2011, through October 13, 2011) and an
additional 120-day period under section 6503(j)(1)(B), because the
court required Corporation P to comply with the designated summons.
Thus, the suspension period applicable with respect to the
designated summons issued to Corporation P begins on March 3, 2011,
and ends on February 10, 2012. Under the facts of this Example 1,
the period of limitations on assessment against Corporation P
further extends to February 24, 2012, to account for the additional
14 days that remained on the period of limitations on assessment
under section 6501 when the suspension period under section 6503(j)
began.
Example 2. Assume the same facts set forth in Example 1, except
that in addition to the issuance of the designated summons and
related enforcement proceedings, on April 5, 2011, a summons
concerning Corporation P's 2007 return is issued and served on
individual A, a third party. This summons is not a related summons
because it was not issued during the 30-day period that began on the
date the designated summons was issued. The third-party summons
served on individual A is subject to the notice requirements of
section 7609(a). Final resolution of individual A's response to this
summons does not occur until February 15, 2012. Because there is no
final resolution of individual A's response to this summons by
October 5, 2011, which is six months from the date of service of the
summons, the period of limitations on assessment against Corporation
P is suspended under section 7609(e)(2) to the date on which there
is a final resolution to that response for the purposes of section
7609(e)(2). Moreover, because final resolution to the summons served
on individual A does not occur until after February 10, 2012, the
end of the suspension period for the designated summons, the period
of limitations on assessment against Corporation P expires 14 days
after the date that the final resolution as provided for in section
7609(e)(2) occurs with respect to the summons served on individual
A.
(5) Computation of 60-day period when last day of assessment period
falls on a weekend or holiday. For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of
this section, in determining whether a designated summons has been
issued at least 60 days before the date on which the period of
limitations on assessment prescribed in section 6501 expires, the
provisions of section 7503 apply when the last day of the assessment
period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.
(e) Effective/applicability date. This section is applicable on
July 31, 2009.
Approved: July 15, 2009.
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Michael Mundaca,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. E9-18380 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P