Superior National Forest, Laurentian Ranger District; Minnesota; Tracks Project Environmental Impact Statement, 38165-38166 [E9-17996]

Download as PDF 38165 Notices Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 146 Friday, July 31, 2009 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES July 27, 2009. The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. Comments regarding (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of burden including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology should be addressed to: Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250– 7602. Comments regarding these information collections are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days of this notification. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 720–8958. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:38 Jul 30, 2009 Jkt 217001 persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Food and Nutrition Service Title: School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study–IV. OMB Control Number: 0584–0527. Summary of Collection: The School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study–IV (SNDA–IV) will collect a broad range of data from a nationally representative sample of public School Food Authorities (SFAs) and schools. The study will focuses on assessing the nutrient content of school meals offered and served to students in elementary, middle and high schools. The study will also assess issues related to the operation of school meals program, particularly aspects that may influence the nutrient content of meals offered to children, children’s decisions to participate in the meal programs and the experience of children who do participate in the programs. Need and Use of the Information: The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) will collect data from the study to address three broad set of research questions of interest to USDA, the states, SFAs and other program stakeholders: (1) What are the characteristics of schools and SFAs participating in the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and the School Breakfast Program (SBP), particularly as they relate to meal service operations and the food environment? (2) What are the characteristics of meals and snacks offered and served to students? (3) How have school food service and school environment characteristics and meals offered and served to students changed over time? Without this information, FNS will not be able to assess progress toward key strategic goals for the NSLP and SBP or identify related training and technical assistance needs of SFAs and schools. Description of Respondents: State, Local, or Tribal Government. Number of Respondents: 3,725. Frequency of Responses: Report: Other (One time). Total Burden Hours: 7,111. Ruth Brown, Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E9–18245 Filed 7–30–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–P PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Superior National Forest, Laurentian Ranger District; Minnesota; Tracks Project Environmental Impact Statement Forest Service, USDA. Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Tracks Project. The proposed activities would manage forest vegetation composition, age class, and spatial patterns. Proposed activities also address the transportation system associated with vegetation activities and long-term Federal and non-federal access needs. The project area encompasses nearly 78,000 acres of National Forest System land. The proposed action would create young forest through timber harvest; improve stand structure and withinstand diversity with harvests such as thinning; and restore stand conditions without harvest. Managing the minimum road system needed for longterm vegetation management would involve adding and decommissioning miles of road. The proposed project is located on the Laurentian Ranger District, Aurora, Minnesota. DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received by August 31, 2009. The draft environmental impact statement is expected in late 2009 and the final environmental impact statement is expected in spring 2010. ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Stephen J. Kuennen, Laurentian District Ranger, Tracks Project, 318 Forestry Road, Aurora, MN 55705. Send electronic comments to commentseastern-superior-laurentian@fs.fed.us. Comments may also be sent via facsimile to (218) 229–8821. It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in such a way that they are useful to the Agency’s preparation of the EIS. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer’s concerns and contentions. The submission of timely E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1 38166 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 146 / Friday, July 31, 2009 / Notices and specific comments can affect a reviewer’s ability to participate in subsequent administrative review or judicial review. Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not provide the respondent with standing to participate in subsequent administrative review or judicial review. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Duffy, Tracks Project Coordinator at 1393 Hy 169, Ely, MN 55731, telephone (218) 365–2097. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose and Need for Action The primary purpose of the Tracks Project is to maintain and promote native vegetation communities that are diverse, productive, healthy, and resilient by moving the vegetation towards the desired vegetation and landscape ecosystem conditions described in the Superior National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). Forest Plan direction for the transportation system is also part of the project’s purpose. Proposed Action The proposed action would manage forest vegetation composition, age class, and spatial patterns and the transportation system associated with these activities. Proposed activities include: creating young forest on approximately 5,166 acres, improving stand structure and within-stand diversity on approximately 1,345 acres, and restoring stand conditions through a variety of non-harvest activities such as planting, biomass removal, and conducting prescribed burns to reduce risk of wildfire on approximately 352 acres. Managing the minimum road system needed for long-term vegetation management would involve adding 5.2 miles of system road and decommissioning 11.4 miles of road. PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Nature of Decision To Be Made An environmental analysis for the Tracks Project will evaluate site-specific issues, consider management alternatives, and analyze the potential effects of the proposed action and alternatives. The scope of the project is limited to decisions concerning 16:38 Jul 30, 2009 Jkt 217001 Permits or Licenses Required Easement or permission to cross nonfederal property may be needed to access some treatment units to implement Forest Service activities. Scoping Process This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides the development of the environmental impact statement. Written comments will be solicited through a notice that will be sent to the landowners within the Tracks Project area and other interested individuals and organizations. It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in such manner that they are useful to the agency’s preparation of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer’s concerns and contentions. The submission of timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer’s ability to participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review. Dated: July 20, 2009. Stephen J. Kuennen, Laurentian District Ranger. [FR Doc. E9–17996 Filed 7–30–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rural Utilities Service Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.: Notice of Finding of No Significant Impact Rural Utilities Service, USDA. Notice of Finding of No Significant Impact. AGENCY: ACTION: Responsible Official Stephen J. Kuennen, Laurentian District Ranger, 318 Forestry Road, Aurora, MN 55705. VerDate Nov<24>2008 activities within the Tracks Project Area that meet the purpose and need, as well as desired conditions. An environmental impact statement will provide the Responsible Official, Stephen J. Kuennen, with the information needed to decide which actions, if any, to approve. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) has made a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) with respect to a request from Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. (AECI) for assistance to finance the construction, operation, and maintenance of a new 540-MW gas-fired combustion combined-cycle generation unit, a new 161/345-kV substation, a new 161-kV transmission line, and a PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 new 345-kV transmission line in Mayes County, Oklahoma. ADDRESSES: The FONSI is available for public review at the USDA Rural Utilities Service’s Web site—https:// www.usda.gov/rus/water/ees/ea.htm or at 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 2244, Stop 1571, Washington, DC 20250–1571; and at AECI’s headquarters office located at 211 South Golden, Springfield, Missouri 65801–4775 or the Pryor Public Library at 505 E. Graham, Pryor, OK 74361. To obtain copies of the FONSI or for further information, contact Stephanie Strength, Environmental Protection Specialist, USDA, Rural Utilities Service, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 1571, Washington, DC 20250–1571, Telephone: (202) 720–0468 or e-mail: stephanie.strength@wdc.usda.gov. or AECI’s headquarters office located at 211 South Golden, Springfield, Missouri 65801–4775. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AECI proposes to construct a 540-megawatt (MW) combined-cycle, gas-fired generation unit at the Mid America Industrial Park Chouteau Power Plant in Mayes County, Oklahoma. A new substation will also be constructed, to be located approximately two miles east of the existing plant, to be connected by a single circuit 161-kV line. A single circuit 345-kV line will further connect the substation to the Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA) Coal-Fired Power Plant, located in Mayes County, Oklahoma. Burns and McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc., an environmental consulting firm, prepared an Environmental Report for RUS. RUS conducted an independent evaluation of the Environmental Report and agreed that it accurately assessed the impacts of the proposal. RUS accepted the document as its Environmental Assessment and published the document for a 30-day public comment period. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all permits required to construct the proposal. Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1) of the regulations (36 CFR part 800) implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 16 U.S.C. 470f, RUS made a finding that this project will not affect historic properties. RUS received no objection to this finding of effect from the Oklahoma State Historic Preservation Office or other consulting parties. RUS has determined this finding of no historic properties affected made pursuant to Section 106 of NHPA to be consistent with its FONSI. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act, as amended E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 146 (Friday, July 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38165-38166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Superior National Forest, Laurentian Ranger District; Minnesota; 
Tracks Project Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, will prepare an 
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Tracks Project. The 
proposed activities would manage forest vegetation composition, age 
class, and spatial patterns. Proposed activities also address the 
transportation system associated with vegetation activities and long-
term Federal and non-federal access needs.
    The project area encompasses nearly 78,000 acres of National Forest 
System land.
    The proposed action would create young forest through timber 
harvest; improve stand structure and within-stand diversity with 
harvests such as thinning; and restore stand conditions without 
harvest. Managing the minimum road system needed for long-term 
vegetation management would involve adding and decommissioning miles of 
road. The proposed project is located on the Laurentian Ranger 
District, Aurora, Minnesota.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
by August 31, 2009. The draft environmental impact statement is 
expected in late 2009 and the final environmental impact statement is 
expected in spring 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Stephen J. Kuennen, Laurentian 
District Ranger, Tracks Project, 318 Forestry Road, Aurora, MN 55705. 
Send electronic comments to comments-eastern-superior-laurentian@fs.fed.us. Comments may also be sent via facsimile to (218) 
229-8821.
    It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times 
and in such a way that they are useful to the Agency's preparation of 
the EIS. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of 
the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer's 
concerns and contentions. The submission of timely

[[Page 38166]]

and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to participate in 
subsequent administrative review or judicial review.
    Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names 
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record 
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be 
accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not provide 
the respondent with standing to participate in subsequent 
administrative review or judicial review.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Duffy, Tracks Project 
Coordinator at 1393 Hy 169, Ely, MN 55731, telephone (218) 365-2097.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose and Need for Action

    The primary purpose of the Tracks Project is to maintain and 
promote native vegetation communities that are diverse, productive, 
healthy, and resilient by moving the vegetation towards the desired 
vegetation and landscape ecosystem conditions described in the Superior 
National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). Forest 
Plan direction for the transportation system is also part of the 
project's purpose.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action would manage forest vegetation composition, age 
class, and spatial patterns and the transportation system associated 
with these activities. Proposed activities include: creating young 
forest on approximately 5,166 acres, improving stand structure and 
within-stand diversity on approximately 1,345 acres, and restoring 
stand conditions through a variety of non-harvest activities such as 
planting, biomass removal, and conducting prescribed burns to reduce 
risk of wildfire on approximately 352 acres. Managing the minimum road 
system needed for long-term vegetation management would involve adding 
5.2 miles of system road and decommissioning 11.4 miles of road.

Responsible Official

    Stephen J. Kuennen, Laurentian District Ranger, 318 Forestry Road, 
Aurora, MN 55705.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    An environmental analysis for the Tracks Project will evaluate 
site-specific issues, consider management alternatives, and analyze the 
potential effects of the proposed action and alternatives. The scope of 
the project is limited to decisions concerning activities within the 
Tracks Project Area that meet the purpose and need, as well as desired 
conditions. An environmental impact statement will provide the 
Responsible Official, Stephen J. Kuennen, with the information needed 
to decide which actions, if any, to approve.

Permits or Licenses Required

    Easement or permission to cross non-federal property may be needed 
to access some treatment units to implement Forest Service activities.

Scoping Process

    This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides 
the development of the environmental impact statement. Written comments 
will be solicited through a notice that will be sent to the landowners 
within the Tracks Project area and other interested individuals and 
organizations.
    It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times 
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of 
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be 
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly 
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions. The submission of 
timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to 
participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review.

    Dated: July 20, 2009.
Stephen J. Kuennen,
Laurentian District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9-17996 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.