Superior National Forest, Laurentian Ranger District; Minnesota; Tracks Project Environmental Impact Statement, 38165-38166 [E9-17996]
Download as PDF
38165
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 146
Friday, July 31, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
July 27, 2009.
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments
regarding (a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology should be addressed to: Desk
Officer for Agriculture, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB),
OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or
fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail
Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250–
7602. Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received
within 30 days of this notification.
Copies of the submission(s) may be
obtained by calling (202) 720–8958.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:38 Jul 30, 2009
Jkt 217001
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Food and Nutrition Service
Title: School Nutrition Dietary
Assessment Study–IV.
OMB Control Number: 0584–0527.
Summary of Collection: The School
Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study–IV
(SNDA–IV) will collect a broad range of
data from a nationally representative
sample of public School Food
Authorities (SFAs) and schools. The
study will focuses on assessing the
nutrient content of school meals offered
and served to students in elementary,
middle and high schools. The study will
also assess issues related to the
operation of school meals program,
particularly aspects that may influence
the nutrient content of meals offered to
children, children’s decisions to
participate in the meal programs and the
experience of children who do
participate in the programs.
Need and Use of the Information: The
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) will
collect data from the study to address
three broad set of research questions of
interest to USDA, the states, SFAs and
other program stakeholders: (1) What
are the characteristics of schools and
SFAs participating in the National
School Lunch Program (NSLP) and the
School Breakfast Program (SBP),
particularly as they relate to meal
service operations and the food
environment? (2) What are the
characteristics of meals and snacks
offered and served to students? (3) How
have school food service and school
environment characteristics and meals
offered and served to students changed
over time? Without this information,
FNS will not be able to assess progress
toward key strategic goals for the NSLP
and SBP or identify related training and
technical assistance needs of SFAs and
schools.
Description of Respondents: State,
Local, or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 3,725.
Frequency of Responses: Report:
Other (One time).
Total Burden Hours: 7,111.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–18245 Filed 7–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Superior National Forest, Laurentian
Ranger District; Minnesota; Tracks
Project Environmental Impact
Statement
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, will prepare
an environmental impact statement
(EIS) for the Tracks Project. The
proposed activities would manage forest
vegetation composition, age class, and
spatial patterns. Proposed activities also
address the transportation system
associated with vegetation activities and
long-term Federal and non-federal
access needs.
The project area encompasses nearly
78,000 acres of National Forest System
land.
The proposed action would create
young forest through timber harvest;
improve stand structure and withinstand diversity with harvests such as
thinning; and restore stand conditions
without harvest. Managing the
minimum road system needed for longterm vegetation management would
involve adding and decommissioning
miles of road. The proposed project is
located on the Laurentian Ranger
District, Aurora, Minnesota.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
August 31, 2009. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected in late 2009 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected in spring 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Stephen J. Kuennen, Laurentian District
Ranger, Tracks Project, 318 Forestry
Road, Aurora, MN 55705. Send
electronic comments to commentseastern-superior-laurentian@fs.fed.us.
Comments may also be sent via
facsimile to (218) 229–8821.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such a way that they are useful to the
Agency’s preparation of the EIS.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. The submission of timely
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
38166
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 146 / Friday, July 31, 2009 / Notices
and specific comments can affect a
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative review or
judicial review.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, anonymous
comments will not provide the
respondent with standing to participate
in subsequent administrative review or
judicial review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Duffy, Tracks Project Coordinator
at 1393 Hy 169, Ely, MN 55731,
telephone (218) 365–2097.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The primary purpose of the Tracks
Project is to maintain and promote
native vegetation communities that are
diverse, productive, healthy, and
resilient by moving the vegetation
towards the desired vegetation and
landscape ecosystem conditions
described in the Superior National
Forest Land and Resource Management
Plan (Forest Plan). Forest Plan direction
for the transportation system is also part
of the project’s purpose.
Proposed Action
The proposed action would manage
forest vegetation composition, age class,
and spatial patterns and the
transportation system associated with
these activities. Proposed activities
include: creating young forest on
approximately 5,166 acres, improving
stand structure and within-stand
diversity on approximately 1,345 acres,
and restoring stand conditions through
a variety of non-harvest activities such
as planting, biomass removal, and
conducting prescribed burns to reduce
risk of wildfire on approximately 352
acres. Managing the minimum road
system needed for long-term vegetation
management would involve adding 5.2
miles of system road and
decommissioning 11.4 miles of road.
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Nature of Decision To Be Made
An environmental analysis for the
Tracks Project will evaluate site-specific
issues, consider management
alternatives, and analyze the potential
effects of the proposed action and
alternatives. The scope of the project is
limited to decisions concerning
16:38 Jul 30, 2009
Jkt 217001
Permits or Licenses Required
Easement or permission to cross nonfederal property may be needed to
access some treatment units to
implement Forest Service activities.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. Written comments
will be solicited through a notice that
will be sent to the landowners within
the Tracks Project area and other
interested individuals and
organizations.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. The submission of timely
and specific comments can affect a
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative appeal or
judicial review.
Dated: July 20, 2009.
Stephen J. Kuennen,
Laurentian District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9–17996 Filed 7–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.:
Notice of Finding of No Significant
Impact
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
Notice of Finding of No
Significant Impact.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Responsible Official
Stephen J. Kuennen, Laurentian
District Ranger, 318 Forestry Road,
Aurora, MN 55705.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
activities within the Tracks Project Area
that meet the purpose and need, as well
as desired conditions. An
environmental impact statement will
provide the Responsible Official,
Stephen J. Kuennen, with the
information needed to decide which
actions, if any, to approve.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) has
made a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) with respect to a request from
Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.
(AECI) for assistance to finance the
construction, operation, and
maintenance of a new 540-MW gas-fired
combustion combined-cycle generation
unit, a new 161/345-kV substation, a
new 161-kV transmission line, and a
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
new 345-kV transmission line in Mayes
County, Oklahoma.
ADDRESSES: The FONSI is available for
public review at the USDA Rural
Utilities Service’s Web site—https://
www.usda.gov/rus/water/ees/ea.htm or
at 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Room 2244, Stop 1571, Washington, DC
20250–1571; and at AECI’s headquarters
office located at 211 South Golden,
Springfield, Missouri 65801–4775 or the
Pryor Public Library at 505 E. Graham,
Pryor, OK 74361. To obtain copies of the
FONSI or for further information,
contact Stephanie Strength,
Environmental Protection Specialist,
USDA, Rural Utilities Service, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 1571,
Washington, DC 20250–1571,
Telephone: (202) 720–0468 or e-mail:
stephanie.strength@wdc.usda.gov. or
AECI’s headquarters office located at
211 South Golden, Springfield, Missouri
65801–4775.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AECI
proposes to construct a 540-megawatt
(MW) combined-cycle, gas-fired
generation unit at the Mid America
Industrial Park Chouteau Power Plant in
Mayes County, Oklahoma. A new
substation will also be constructed, to
be located approximately two miles east
of the existing plant, to be connected by
a single circuit 161-kV line. A single
circuit 345-kV line will further connect
the substation to the Grand River Dam
Authority (GRDA) Coal-Fired Power
Plant, located in Mayes County,
Oklahoma. Burns and McDonnell
Engineering Company, Inc., an
environmental consulting firm,
prepared an Environmental Report for
RUS. RUS conducted an independent
evaluation of the Environmental Report
and agreed that it accurately assessed
the impacts of the proposal. RUS
accepted the document as its
Environmental Assessment and
published the document for a 30-day
public comment period. The applicant
is responsible for obtaining all permits
required to construct the proposal.
Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1) of the
regulations (36 CFR part 800)
implementing Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA), 16 U.S.C. 470f, RUS made a
finding that this project will not affect
historic properties. RUS received no
objection to this finding of effect from
the Oklahoma State Historic
Preservation Office or other consulting
parties. RUS has determined this
finding of no historic properties affected
made pursuant to Section 106 of NHPA
to be consistent with its FONSI.
In accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act, as amended
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 146 (Friday, July 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38165-38166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17996]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Superior National Forest, Laurentian Ranger District; Minnesota;
Tracks Project Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Tracks Project. The
proposed activities would manage forest vegetation composition, age
class, and spatial patterns. Proposed activities also address the
transportation system associated with vegetation activities and long-
term Federal and non-federal access needs.
The project area encompasses nearly 78,000 acres of National Forest
System land.
The proposed action would create young forest through timber
harvest; improve stand structure and within-stand diversity with
harvests such as thinning; and restore stand conditions without
harvest. Managing the minimum road system needed for long-term
vegetation management would involve adding and decommissioning miles of
road. The proposed project is located on the Laurentian Ranger
District, Aurora, Minnesota.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by August 31, 2009. The draft environmental impact statement is
expected in late 2009 and the final environmental impact statement is
expected in spring 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Stephen J. Kuennen, Laurentian
District Ranger, Tracks Project, 318 Forestry Road, Aurora, MN 55705.
Send electronic comments to comments-eastern-superior-laurentian@fs.fed.us. Comments may also be sent via facsimile to (218)
229-8821.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such a way that they are useful to the Agency's preparation of
the EIS. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of
the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer's
concerns and contentions. The submission of timely
[[Page 38166]]
and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to participate in
subsequent administrative review or judicial review.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not provide
the respondent with standing to participate in subsequent
administrative review or judicial review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Duffy, Tracks Project
Coordinator at 1393 Hy 169, Ely, MN 55731, telephone (218) 365-2097.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The primary purpose of the Tracks Project is to maintain and
promote native vegetation communities that are diverse, productive,
healthy, and resilient by moving the vegetation towards the desired
vegetation and landscape ecosystem conditions described in the Superior
National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). Forest
Plan direction for the transportation system is also part of the
project's purpose.
Proposed Action
The proposed action would manage forest vegetation composition, age
class, and spatial patterns and the transportation system associated
with these activities. Proposed activities include: creating young
forest on approximately 5,166 acres, improving stand structure and
within-stand diversity on approximately 1,345 acres, and restoring
stand conditions through a variety of non-harvest activities such as
planting, biomass removal, and conducting prescribed burns to reduce
risk of wildfire on approximately 352 acres. Managing the minimum road
system needed for long-term vegetation management would involve adding
5.2 miles of system road and decommissioning 11.4 miles of road.
Responsible Official
Stephen J. Kuennen, Laurentian District Ranger, 318 Forestry Road,
Aurora, MN 55705.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
An environmental analysis for the Tracks Project will evaluate
site-specific issues, consider management alternatives, and analyze the
potential effects of the proposed action and alternatives. The scope of
the project is limited to decisions concerning activities within the
Tracks Project Area that meet the purpose and need, as well as desired
conditions. An environmental impact statement will provide the
Responsible Official, Stephen J. Kuennen, with the information needed
to decide which actions, if any, to approve.
Permits or Licenses Required
Easement or permission to cross non-federal property may be needed
to access some treatment units to implement Forest Service activities.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. Written comments
will be solicited through a notice that will be sent to the landowners
within the Tracks Project area and other interested individuals and
organizations.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions. The submission of
timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to
participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review.
Dated: July 20, 2009.
Stephen J. Kuennen,
Laurentian District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9-17996 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M