Applications for Food and Drug Administration Approval To Market a New Drug; Postmarketing Reports; Reporting Information About Authorized Generic Drugs, 37163-37168 [E9-17963]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
37163
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by
amending Class E airspace at Ankeny,
IA, reconfiguring controlled airspace at
Ankeny Regional Airport, Ankeny, IA,
for the safety and management of IFR
operations. This action also updates the
geographic coordinates of the airport to
coincide with the FAA’s National
Aeronautical Charting Office. This rule
also cites the correct paragraph in which
the Class E2 airspace is found in FAA
Order 7400.9S.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it amends
controlled airspace at Ankeny Regional
Airport, Ankeny, IA.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
FAA found that the cite for the Class E2
airspace was omitted. With the
exception of editorial changes, and the
changes described above, this rule is the
same as that proposed in the NPRM.
■
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
Part 71 continues to read as follows:
21 CFR Part 314
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E. O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
RIN 0910–AG19
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR Part 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
signed October 3, 2008, and effective
October 31, 2008, is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated
as surface areas.
*
*
ACE IA E2
*
*
*
Ankeny, IA [Amended]
Ankeny Regional Airport, IA
(Lat. 41°41′29″ N., long. 93°33′59″ W.)
Within a 4-mile radius of Ankeny Regional
Airport, excluding that portion within the
Des Moines Class C airspace area.
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface.
*
*
ACE IA E5
*
*
*
Ankeny, IA [Amended]
Ankeny Regional Airport, IA
(Lat. 41°41′29″ N., long. 93°33′59″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7.1-mile
radius of Ankeny Regional Airport, and
within 2 miles each side of the 045° bearing
from the airport extending from the 7.1-mile
radius to 9.3 miles northeast of the airport,
and within 2 miles each side of the 012°
bearing from the airport extending from the
7.1-mile radius to 11.1 miles north of the
airport, excluding that portion within the Des
Moines Class C airspace area.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 16,
2009.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E9–17863 Filed 7–27–09; 8:45 am]
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:
■
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0341]
Applications for Food and Drug
Administration Approval To Market a
New Drug; Postmarketing Reports;
Reporting Information About
Authorized Generic Drugs
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending its
regulations to require that the holder of
a new drug application (NDA) submit
certain information regarding
authorized generic drugs in an annual
report. We are taking this action as part
of our implementation of the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act
of 2007 (FDAAA). FDAAA requires that
FDA publish a list of all authorized
generic drugs included in an annual
report since 1999, and that the agency
update the list quarterly.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 25, 2010.
ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle D.D. Bernstein, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6362,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–3601.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of September
29, 2008 (73 FR 56487), FDA published
a direct final rule to amend § 314.3 (21
CFR 314.3) to add a definition of
‘‘authorized generic drug’’ and § 314.81
(21 CFR 314.81) to require that an NDA
holder specifically report that it has
marketed an authorized generic drug
during the applicable time period. We
explained that we issued this rule as a
direct final rule because we believed it
was noncontroversial and that there was
little likelihood of receiving significant
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
37164
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
adverse comments. We concurrently
published in the Federal Register of
September 29, 2008 (73 FR 56529) a
companion proposed rule, identical in
substance to the direct final rule, that
provided a procedural framework from
which to proceed with standard noticeand-comment rulemaking in the event
we were required to withdraw the direct
final rule because of significant adverse
comments. A significant adverse
comment is defined as a comment that
explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. Any
comments received under the
companion proposed rule were treated
as comments regarding the direct final
rule and vice versa. A full description
of FDA’s policy on direct final rule
procedures may be found in a guidance
document published in the Federal
Register of November 21, 1997 (62 FR
62466).
We received four comments on the
proposed rule, which included several
comments that were arguably significant
adverse comments. Therefore, in the
Federal Register of February 10, 2009
(74 FR 6541), we withdrew the direct
final rule. This final rule summarizes
and responds to the comments received
on the direct final rule and proposed
rule. See section III of this document for
a discussion of the comments and FDA’s
responses.
On September 27, 2007, the President
signed into law FDAAA (Public Law
110–85, 121 Stat. 823). Section 920 of
FDAAA adds new section 505(t) to the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(t)). Section
505(t) of the act requires that FDA take
the following actions:
• Publish on its Internet site a
complete list of all authorized generic
drugs included in an annual report
submitted to the agency after January 1,
1999, consisting of the drug trade name,
the brand company manufacturer, and
the date the authorized generic drug
entered the market;
• Update the list quarterly; and
• Notify relevant Federal agencies,
including the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services and the Federal
Trade Commission, that the list has
been published and will be updated
quarterly.
For purposes of publishing the list,
section 505(t)(3) of the act defines the
term ‘‘authorized generic drug’’ as a
‘‘listed drug (as that term is used in
[section 505(j) of the act]) that has been
approved under [section 505(c) of the
act] and is marketed, sold, or distributed
directly or indirectly to retail class of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
trade under a different labeling,
packaging (other than repackaging as the
listed drug in blister packs, unit doses,
or similar packaging for use in
institutions), product code, labeler code,
trade name, or trade mark than the
listed drug.’’ On June 27, 2008, based on
information available to FDA at that
time, the agency initially published the
list of authorized generic drugs on
FDA’s Web site at https://www.fda.gov/
cder/ogd/AG_Listing.htm.
A. The Proposed Rule
Currently, there is no requirement
that an NDA holder specifically report
that it is marketing an ‘‘authorized
generic drug.’’ NDA holders are required
to include information about
distribution or certain changes to
manufacturing or labeling in annual
reports, which may indicate that an
authorized generic is being marketed.
However, annual reports may not
include all the information necessary for
FDA to publish the list required by
FDAAA. For example, sponsors rarely
include the date the authorized generic
entered the market.
As stated in the proposed rule, to
allow FDA to accurately report a
complete list of all authorized generic
drugs included in annual reports and to
update the list in a timely fashion, we
proposed to add a requirement that
annual reports specifically and clearly
include the information we are required
to report. In addition, we proposed that
the NDA holder report the date the
authorized generic drug ceased being
distributed to ensure that the list is as
accurate and up-to-date as possible. The
first annual report submitted after
implementation of this regulation must
provide information regarding any
authorized generic drug that was
marketed during the time period
covered by an annual report submitted
after January 1, 1999.
B. Changes to the Proposed Rule
We received a number of comments
on the proposed rule regarding
submission of the required information.
Some of the comments requested
clarification about electronic
submission of the information and
urged speedy adoption of an electronic
means for submission of the
information. One comment opposed the
provision requiring separate submission
of the information by mail in either hard
copy or electronic format in addition to
submission as part of the annual report.
We address all of the comments in
section III of this document.
After considering the comments, we
have concluded that it is appropriate to
make a revision to the proposed rule to
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
permit e-mail submission of the
required information in addition to
regular mail, including courier delivery.
The final rule revises proposed
§ 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) to allow NDA
holders to send the required information
to the Authorized Generics electronic
mailbox at
AuthorizedGenerics@fda.hhs.gov with
‘‘Authorized Generic Submission’’
indicated in the subject line.
We also revised the last line of that
section to clarify when separate
submission of the authorized generics
information is required by this rule.
When information is included in an
annual report about an authorized
generic drug, the final rule requires that
a copy of that portion of the annual
report be sent to a central office in the
agency that will compile the list of
authorized generic drugs and update it
quarterly. At such time as FDA requires
electronic submission of annual reports
through a system that allows for the
extraction of relevant information from
annual reports, separate submission of
the information will no longer be
required.
Finally, on our own initiative, we
have also revised § 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) to
provide a new mailing address (street
address) for submissions made by
regular mail.
II. Description of the Final Rule
We are amending our regulations in
§ 314.3 (21 CFR 314.3) to add a
definition for the term ‘‘authorized
generic drug.’’ The definition provides
that an authorized generic drug is a
listed drug (as defined in § 314.3 (21
CFR 314.3)) that has been approved
under section 505(c) of the act and is
marketed, sold, or distributed directly or
indirectly to retail class of trade with
either labeling, packaging (other than
repackaging as the listed drug in blister
packs, unit doses, or similar packaging
for use in institutions), product code,
labeler code, trade name, or trade mark
that differs from that of the listed drug.
We are also amending our regulations
in § 314.81 (21 CFR 314.81) to require
that an NDA holder specifically report
that it has marketed an authorized
generic drug during the applicable time
period. Section 314.81(b)(2) requires
that an NDA holder submit an annual
report within 60 days of the anniversary
date of approval of an NDA for every
NDA it holds. We are amending § 314.81
by redesignating paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
regarding distribution data as paragraph
(b)(2)(ii)(a), and adding a new paragraph
(b)(2)(ii)(b) regarding marketing of
authorized generic drugs. Under this
new paragraph, if an authorized generic
drug was marketed under an NDA, or
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
ceased to be marketed, during the
reporting year, the annual report must
list the date the authorized generic drug
entered the market, or the date the
authorized generic drug ceased being
distributed, and the corresponding trade
or brand name. Each dosage form and/
or strength is a different authorized
generic drug and should be listed
separately. The first annual report
submitted after implementation of this
regulation must include the required
marketing information for any
authorized generic drug that was
marketed during the time period
covered by an annual report submitted
after January 1, 1999.
If information is included in the
annual report with respect to any
authorized generic drug, a copy of the
portion of the annual report with that
information must be sent to the Food
and Drug Administration, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of
New Drug Quality Assessment, Bldg. 21,
rm. 2562, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, and
marked ‘‘Authorized Generic
Submission’’; or to the Authorized
Generics electronic mailbox at
AuthorizedGenerics@fda.hhs.gov with
‘‘Authorized Generic Submission’’
indicated in the subject line. This final
rule assumes that the copy of the
relevant portion of the annual report
may currently be submitted in one of
several different formats (e.g., a paper
copy, a PDF document on a computer
disc, or an e-mail containing the
required information). Although annual
reports may currently be submitted in
electronic format to the relevant
division responsible for reviewing a
particular NDA, current capabilities do
not permit us to create a centralized
authorized generics database by
extracting information from the relevant
portion of the annual reports submitted
in that format. However, FDA is
committed to adapting its business
practices to evolving technology,
including using the significant
advancements in Web-based, electronic
systems. In anticipation of the future
changes, this final rule provides that
once an electronic submission format is
mandated for annual reports and new
requirements for electronic submission
to the agency of annual reporting
information are established, the
authorized generics information will
then be required to be submitted as part
of the annual report submission in
accordance with the new requirements.
Separate submission of the information
will no longer be required when FDA
has a method of extracting the relevant
information from annual reports.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
37165
III. Comments on the Proposed Rule
and FDA’s Responses
under this rule for inclusion on the
authorized generic drug list.
We received four comments in
response to the proposed rule.
Comments were received from
individual consumers and industry
organizations. A summary of the
comments received and our responses
follow.
B. Comments on Electronic Submission
A. General Comments
(Comment 1) Two comments
generally supported the proposed rule.
One of these comments urged FDA to
require submission of additional
information, such as the brand name
associated with the authorized generic
drug and whether a prescription is
required, for inclusion on the list of
authorized generic drugs.
(Response) FDA appreciates the
supportive comments. Regarding the
submission of additional information
suggested by the commenter, note that
this final rule requires, as we proposed,
that annual reports list the date each
authorized generic drug entered the
market, the date each authorized generic
drug ceased being distributed, and the
corresponding trade or brand name. We
do not believe it is necessary to also
require prescription status to be
reported to FDA and included on the
list because such information is easily
obtained from product labeling or other
publicly available sources if the trade
name is known. The information
required to be reported under new
§ 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) of the regulations
tracks the requirements of section 505(t)
of the act and adequately informs the
public of the marketing of an authorized
generic drug. Thus, we decline to adopt
the suggestion to require submission of
prescription status information.
(Comment 2) One comment requested
that we clarify the contents of the
required submission, particularly with
regard to distribution data that is
required to be submitted under current
§ 314.81(b)(2)(ii) with the annual report.
(Response) As stated in section II of
this document, the information we are
requiring be submitted separately for
authorized generic drugs is the date
each authorized generic drug entered
the market, the date each authorized
generic drug ceased being distributed,
and the corresponding trade or brand
name. Current § 314.81(b)(2)(ii) requires
that distribution data about a drug
product marketed under an approved
NDA be submitted with the annual
report. In the codified of this final rule,
§ 314.81(b)(2)(ii) is renumbered as
§ 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(a), but otherwise
remains unchanged. Distribution data is
not required to be separately submitted
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(Comment 3) One comment requested
clarification about electronic
submission of the required information.
Another comment urged speedy
adoption of an electronic means for
submission of the required information.
(Comment 4) One comment opposed
the provision requiring separate
submission of the required information
by mail in either hard copy or electronic
format. The comment stated that this
provision is contrary to FDA’s longstanding record of encouraging and
facilitating electronic regulatory
submissions and to its goal to use
information technology to facilitate the
application and review processes. The
commenter believes that for annual
reports currently submitted in electronic
format, FDA should not require separate
submission of the authorized generic
information to the Office of
Pharmaceutical Science.
(Response) The purpose of this rule is
to facilitate FDA’s obligation to
accurately report a complete list of all
authorized generic drugs included in
annual reports and to update the list in
a timely fashion. To fulfill our
obligation, we need ready access to the
required information. Therefore, in this
final rule, we are requiring that the
section 505(t) of the act information be
separately sent to us, as proposed.
However, in response to the comments,
we have modified the language in
§ 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) to provide that the
authorized generics information may
also be submitted to FDA using e-mail,
in lieu of sending the information by
regular mail or courier. FDA believes
this will provide an alternative method
of submission that may be more
convenient for some sponsors. We
encourage sponsors that currently elect
to submit their annual reports in
electronic format to continue to do so.
At such time that electronic submission
of annual reports is mandated by FDA
and FDA develops the capability to
readily retrieve information it needs to
comply with section 505(t) of the act,
separate submission of the authorized
generic information will no longer be
necessary, and the language in
§ 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) of the codified has
been clarified to reflect this. Until
electronic submission of annual reports
is required and FDA can readily retrieve
the authorized generics information
from the annual reports database,
sponsors must submit the authorized
generics information separately by
regular mail or e-mail (regardless of
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
37166
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
what format the sponsor currently uses
to submit its annual report).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
C. Comment on Effective Date
(Comment 5) One comment opposed
the proposed rule because it does not
‘‘prioritize collection of information on
currently distributed authorized generic
drugs.’’ The commenter suggested that
FDA first require sponsors to report
information about currently distributed
authorized generic drugs and, at a later
stage, require reporting of information
on authorized generic drugs marketed
after 1999 but subsequently
discontinued. The same commenter
requested that FDA provide for an
effective date that would allow sponsors
time for advance planning, revision of
operating procedures governing
preparation of annual reports, and
review of historical records.
(Response) We have adopted an
effective date of 6 months after
publication of this final rule. We believe
that 6 months will allow time for
advance planning, revision of operating
procedures, and any review of historical
records that would be necessary to
collect the required information on
marketing of authorized generic drugs
since 1999 that must be reported under
new § 314.81(b)(ii)(b) of the regulations.
Because we have adopted an effective
date that permits adequate time for
manufacturers/sponsors to collect and
report information on both currently
marketed authorized generic drugs and
authorized generic drugs marketed since
1999, it is not necessary to adopt the
two-stage reporting process
recommended by the commenter.
Accordingly, we decline to revise the
final rule to adopt such a process.
D. Comment on Definition
(Comment 6) One comment stated
that the definition of authorized generic
drugs adopted in this rule has the effect
of requiring the reporting of certain
products (and capturing these products
on the published list) that Congress did
not intend to be reported as authorized
generic drugs or included on a list of
authorized generic drugs. The comment
further stated that capturing and listing
products that Congress does not
consider authorized generic drugs
complicates and slows the efficient and
timely use of the information. The
commenter urged FDA to exercise its
enforcement discretion to collect
information only for products that
Congress considers authorized generic
drugs.
(Response) The definition of
authorized generic drugs we proposed is
substantially identical to the definition
Congress provided in section 505(t) of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
the act. Absent some clear indication
that Congress did not intend to include
in the scope of section 505(t) certain
products which clearly fall within the
plain language of the definition, it
would be inappropriate for FDA to
narrow or otherwise alter the statutory
definition of authorized generic drug.
FDA’s mandate is to publish a complete
list of authorized generic drugs as
defined in section 505(t) of the act, and
to update the list quarterly.
Accordingly, we decline to adopt the
commenter’s suggestion to revise the
definition of authorized generic drugs to
collect information about a narrower
range of products than Congress
specified in the act.
IV. Legal Authority
The act, as amended by FDAAA,
provides authority for FDA to issue this
final rule. Section 505(t) of the act
requires that FDA publish a complete
list of all authorized generic drugs
included in an annual report submitted
to the agency after January 1, 1999, and
to update that list quarterly. In addition,
section 701(a) of the act (21 U.S.C.
371(a)) provides general authority for
FDA to issue regulations for the efficient
enforcement of the act. This final rule
amends FDA’s existing regulations
regarding annual reports to ensure that
the information necessary for the agency
to fulfill its obligation under section
505(t) is clearly reported.
V. Environmental Impact
The agency has determined under 21
CFR part 25 that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
VI. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the
final rule under Executive Order 12866
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public
Law 104–4). Executive Order 12866
directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). The agency
believes that this final rule is not a
significant regulatory action under the
Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because this final rule imposes
only minimal regulatory obligations, the
agency certifies that the final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $130
million, using the most current (2007)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this final rule to result in any 1–year
expenditure that would meet or exceed
this amount.
The only costs of this final rule are
associated with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA)
burden, described in section VII of this
document. If we assume an average
hourly wage plus benefits of $56 for the
reporting personnel, the annual cost is
about $29,000 ($56 per hour × 520
hours).
VII. The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995
This final rule contains information
collection provisions that are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3501–3520). The title, description, and
respondent description of the
information collection provisions are
shown with an estimate of the annual
reporting and recordkeeping burden in
table 1 of this document. Included in
the estimate is the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing each collection of
information.
Title: Applications for FDA Approval
to Market a New Drug; Postmarketing
Reports; Reporting Information About
Authorized Generic Drugs
Description: This rulemaking requires
the holder of an NDA to notify the
agency if an authorized generic drug is
marketed by clearly including this
information in annual reports in an
easily accessible place and by sending a
copy of the relevant portion of the
annual reports to a central contact point.
We are taking this action as part of our
implementation of FDAAA, which
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
requires that FDA publish a list of all
authorized generic drugs included in an
annual report after January 1, 1999, and
that the agency update the list quarterly.
We initially published this list on June
27, 2008, on the Internet and notified
relevant Federal agencies that the list
was published, and we will continue to
update it.
Description of Respondents: Current
holders of an NDA under which an
authorized generic drug was marketed
37167
during the time period covered by an
annual report submitted after January 1,
1999.
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
Number of
respondents
21 CFR 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b)
Annual frequency
per response
Total annual
responses
Hours per
response
Total hours
Authorized generic drug information
in the first annual report submitted after the implementation of
§ 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b)
60
6.7
400
1 hour
400
Authorized generic drug information
submitted in each subsequent
annual report
60
6.7
400
15 minutes
100
The submission of a copy of that
portion of each annual report
containing authorized generic
drug information
60
6.7
400
3 minutes
20
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
During the past several years, FDA
has been reviewing annual reports it has
received under § 314.81(b)(2) to discern
whether an authorized generic drug is
being marketed by the NDA holder.
Based on information learned from this
review and based on the number of
annual reports the agency currently
receives under § 314.81(b)(2), we
estimate that, after the implementation
of § 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b), we will receive
approximately 400 annual reports
containing the information required
under § 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for authorized
generic drugs that were marketed during
the time period covered by an annual
report submitted after January 1, 1999.
Based on the number of sponsors that
currently submit all annual reports, we
estimate that approximately 60 sponsors
will submit these 400 annual reports
with authorized generics. As indicated
in table 1 of this document, we are
estimating that the same number of
annual reports will be submitted each
subsequent year from the same number
of sponsors containing the information
required under § 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b), and
that the same number of copies of that
portion of each annual report containing
the authorized generic drug information
will be submitted from the same number
of sponsors. Concerning the hours per
response, based on our estimate of 40
hours to prepare each annual report
currently submitted under
§ 314.81(b)(2), we estimate that sponsors
will need approximately 1 hour to
prepare the information required under
§ 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for each authorized
generic drug that was marketed during
the time period covered by an annual
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
report submitted after January 1, 1999;
approximately 15 minutes to prepare
the information required under
§ 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for each subsequent
annual report; and approximately 3
minutes to submit to FDA a copy of that
portion of each annual report containing
the authorized generic drug information.
The information collection provisions
of this final rule have been submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review, as required by section
3507(d) of the PRA. Prior to the effective
date of this final rule, FDA will publish
a notice in the Federal Register
announcing OMB’s decision to approve,
modify, or disapprove the information
collection provisions in this final rule.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 314
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Drugs, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
■ Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 314 is
amended as follows:
VIII. Federalism
§ 314.3
FDA has analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the principles set forth
in Executive Order 13132. FDA has
determined that the rule does not
contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, the
agency has concluded that the rule does
not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
*
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 314—APPLICATIONS FOR FDA
APPROVAL TO MARKET A NEW DRUG
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 314 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352,
353, 355, 356, 356a, 356b, 356c, 371, 374,
379e.
2. Section 314.3 is amended in
paragraph (b) by alphabetically adding
the definition for ‘‘authorized generic
drug’’ to read as follows:
■
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Authorized generic drug means a
listed drug, as defined in this section,
that has been approved under section
505(c) of the act and is marketed, sold,
or distributed directly or indirectly to
retail class of trade with labeling,
packaging (other than repackaging as the
listed drug in blister packs, unit doses,
or similar packaging for use in
institutions), product code, labeler code,
trade name, or trademark that differs
from that of the listed drug.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 314.81 is amended by
redesignating paragraph (b)(2)(ii) as
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
37168
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(a) and by adding
new paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(b) as follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
§ 314.81
40 CFR Part 52
Other postmarketing reports.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(b) Authorized generic drugs. If
applicable, the date each authorized
generic drug (as defined in § 314.3)
entered the market, the date each
authorized generic drug ceased being
distributed, and the corresponding trade
or brand name. Each dosage form and/
or strength is a different authorized
generic drug and should be listed
separately. The first annual report
submitted on or after January 25, 2010
must include the information listed in
this paragraph for any authorized
generic drug that was marketed during
the time period covered by an annual
report submitted after January 1, 1999.
If information is included in the annual
report with respect to any authorized
generic drug, a copy of that portion of
the annual report must be sent to the
Food and Drug Administration, Center
for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Office of New Drug Quality Assessment,
Bldg. 21, rm. 2562, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD
20993–0002, and marked ‘‘Authorized
Generic Submission’’ or, by e-mail, to
the Authorized Generics electronic
mailbox at
AuthorizedGenerics@fda.hhs.gov with
‘‘Authorized Generic Submission’’
indicated in the subject line. However,
at such time that FDA has required that
annual reports be submitted in an
electronic format, the information
required by this paragraph must be
submitted as part of the annual report,
in the electronic format specified for
submission of annual reports at that
time, and not as a separate submission
under the preceding sentence in this
paragraph.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: April 7, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–17963 Filed 7–27–09; 8:45 am]
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
[EPA–R04–OAR–2009–0303(a); FRL–8936–
2]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; South Carolina;
Transportation Conformity
Memorandum of Agreement Update
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve a revision to the South
Carolina State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted on November 28, 2008,
through the South Carolina Department
of Health and Environmental Control
(SC DHEC). This revision consists of
transportation conformity criteria and
procedures related to interagency
consultation and enforceability of
certain transportation-related control
measures and mitigation measures. The
intended effect of this approval is to
update the transportation conformity
criteria and procedures in the South
Carolina SIP.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
September 28, 2009 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by August 27, 2009. If EPA
receives such comments, it will publish
a timely withdrawal of the direct final
rule in the Federal Register and inform
the public that the rule will not take
effect.
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2009–0303, by one of the
following methods:
a. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
b. E-mail: Wood.amanetta@epa.gov.
c. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
d. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2009–0303,
Air Quality Modeling and
Transportation Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
e. Hand Delivery or Courier: Amanetta
Wood, Air Quality Modeling and
Transportation Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2009–
0303. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Quality Modeling and
Transportation Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 28, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37163-37168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17963]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 314
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0341]
RIN 0910-AG19
Applications for Food and Drug Administration Approval To Market
a New Drug; Postmarketing Reports; Reporting Information About
Authorized Generic Drugs
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending its
regulations to require that the holder of a new drug application (NDA)
submit certain information regarding authorized generic drugs in an
annual report. We are taking this action as part of our implementation
of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA).
FDAAA requires that FDA publish a list of all authorized generic drugs
included in an annual report since 1999, and that the agency update the
list quarterly.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 25, 2010.
ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle D.D. Bernstein, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6362, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3601.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of September 29, 2008 (73 FR 56487), FDA
published a direct final rule to amend Sec. 314.3 (21 CFR 314.3) to
add a definition of ``authorized generic drug'' and Sec. 314.81 (21
CFR 314.81) to require that an NDA holder specifically report that it
has marketed an authorized generic drug during the applicable time
period. We explained that we issued this rule as a direct final rule
because we believed it was noncontroversial and that there was little
likelihood of receiving significant
[[Page 37164]]
adverse comments. We concurrently published in the Federal Register of
September 29, 2008 (73 FR 56529) a companion proposed rule, identical
in substance to the direct final rule, that provided a procedural
framework from which to proceed with standard notice-and-comment
rulemaking in the event we were required to withdraw the direct final
rule because of significant adverse comments. A significant adverse
comment is defined as a comment that explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. Any
comments received under the companion proposed rule were treated as
comments regarding the direct final rule and vice versa. A full
description of FDA's policy on direct final rule procedures may be
found in a guidance document published in the Federal Register of
November 21, 1997 (62 FR 62466).
We received four comments on the proposed rule, which included
several comments that were arguably significant adverse comments.
Therefore, in the Federal Register of February 10, 2009 (74 FR 6541),
we withdrew the direct final rule. This final rule summarizes and
responds to the comments received on the direct final rule and proposed
rule. See section III of this document for a discussion of the comments
and FDA's responses.
On September 27, 2007, the President signed into law FDAAA (Public
Law 110-85, 121 Stat. 823). Section 920 of FDAAA adds new section
505(t) to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(t)). Section 505(t) of the act requires that FDA take the following
actions:
Publish on its Internet site a complete list of all
authorized generic drugs included in an annual report submitted to the
agency after January 1, 1999, consisting of the drug trade name, the
brand company manufacturer, and the date the authorized generic drug
entered the market;
Update the list quarterly; and
Notify relevant Federal agencies, including the Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Federal Trade Commission,
that the list has been published and will be updated quarterly.
For purposes of publishing the list, section 505(t)(3) of the act
defines the term ``authorized generic drug'' as a ``listed drug (as
that term is used in [section 505(j) of the act]) that has been
approved under [section 505(c) of the act] and is marketed, sold, or
distributed directly or indirectly to retail class of trade under a
different labeling, packaging (other than repackaging as the listed
drug in blister packs, unit doses, or similar packaging for use in
institutions), product code, labeler code, trade name, or trade mark
than the listed drug.'' On June 27, 2008, based on information
available to FDA at that time, the agency initially published the list
of authorized generic drugs on FDA's Web site at https://www.fda.gov/cder/ogd/AG_Listing.htm.
A. The Proposed Rule
Currently, there is no requirement that an NDA holder specifically
report that it is marketing an ``authorized generic drug.'' NDA holders
are required to include information about distribution or certain
changes to manufacturing or labeling in annual reports, which may
indicate that an authorized generic is being marketed. However, annual
reports may not include all the information necessary for FDA to
publish the list required by FDAAA. For example, sponsors rarely
include the date the authorized generic entered the market.
As stated in the proposed rule, to allow FDA to accurately report a
complete list of all authorized generic drugs included in annual
reports and to update the list in a timely fashion, we proposed to add
a requirement that annual reports specifically and clearly include the
information we are required to report. In addition, we proposed that
the NDA holder report the date the authorized generic drug ceased being
distributed to ensure that the list is as accurate and up-to-date as
possible. The first annual report submitted after implementation of
this regulation must provide information regarding any authorized
generic drug that was marketed during the time period covered by an
annual report submitted after January 1, 1999.
B. Changes to the Proposed Rule
We received a number of comments on the proposed rule regarding
submission of the required information. Some of the comments requested
clarification about electronic submission of the information and urged
speedy adoption of an electronic means for submission of the
information. One comment opposed the provision requiring separate
submission of the information by mail in either hard copy or electronic
format in addition to submission as part of the annual report. We
address all of the comments in section III of this document.
After considering the comments, we have concluded that it is
appropriate to make a revision to the proposed rule to permit e-mail
submission of the required information in addition to regular mail,
including courier delivery. The final rule revises proposed Sec.
314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) to allow NDA holders to send the required
information to the Authorized Generics electronic mailbox at
AuthorizedGenerics@fda.hhs.gov with ``Authorized Generic Submission''
indicated in the subject line.
We also revised the last line of that section to clarify when
separate submission of the authorized generics information is required
by this rule. When information is included in an annual report about an
authorized generic drug, the final rule requires that a copy of that
portion of the annual report be sent to a central office in the agency
that will compile the list of authorized generic drugs and update it
quarterly. At such time as FDA requires electronic submission of annual
reports through a system that allows for the extraction of relevant
information from annual reports, separate submission of the information
will no longer be required.
Finally, on our own initiative, we have also revised Sec.
314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) to provide a new mailing address (street address)
for submissions made by regular mail.
II. Description of the Final Rule
We are amending our regulations in Sec. 314.3 (21 CFR 314.3) to
add a definition for the term ``authorized generic drug.'' The
definition provides that an authorized generic drug is a listed drug
(as defined in Sec. 314.3 (21 CFR 314.3)) that has been approved under
section 505(c) of the act and is marketed, sold, or distributed
directly or indirectly to retail class of trade with either labeling,
packaging (other than repackaging as the listed drug in blister packs,
unit doses, or similar packaging for use in institutions), product
code, labeler code, trade name, or trade mark that differs from that of
the listed drug.
We are also amending our regulations in Sec. 314.81 (21 CFR
314.81) to require that an NDA holder specifically report that it has
marketed an authorized generic drug during the applicable time period.
Section 314.81(b)(2) requires that an NDA holder submit an annual
report within 60 days of the anniversary date of approval of an NDA for
every NDA it holds. We are amending Sec. 314.81 by redesignating
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) regarding distribution data as paragraph
(b)(2)(ii)(a), and adding a new paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(b) regarding
marketing of authorized generic drugs. Under this new paragraph, if an
authorized generic drug was marketed under an NDA, or
[[Page 37165]]
ceased to be marketed, during the reporting year, the annual report
must list the date the authorized generic drug entered the market, or
the date the authorized generic drug ceased being distributed, and the
corresponding trade or brand name. Each dosage form and/or strength is
a different authorized generic drug and should be listed separately.
The first annual report submitted after implementation of this
regulation must include the required marketing information for any
authorized generic drug that was marketed during the time period
covered by an annual report submitted after January 1, 1999.
If information is included in the annual report with respect to any
authorized generic drug, a copy of the portion of the annual report
with that information must be sent to the Food and Drug Administration,
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of New Drug Quality
Assessment, Bldg. 21, rm. 2562, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, and marked ``Authorized Generic Submission''; or
to the Authorized Generics electronic mailbox at
AuthorizedGenerics@fda.hhs.gov with ``Authorized Generic Submission''
indicated in the subject line. This final rule assumes that the copy of
the relevant portion of the annual report may currently be submitted in
one of several different formats (e.g., a paper copy, a PDF document on
a computer disc, or an e-mail containing the required information).
Although annual reports may currently be submitted in electronic format
to the relevant division responsible for reviewing a particular NDA,
current capabilities do not permit us to create a centralized
authorized generics database by extracting information from the
relevant portion of the annual reports submitted in that format.
However, FDA is committed to adapting its business practices to
evolving technology, including using the significant advancements in
Web-based, electronic systems. In anticipation of the future changes,
this final rule provides that once an electronic submission format is
mandated for annual reports and new requirements for electronic
submission to the agency of annual reporting information are
established, the authorized generics information will then be required
to be submitted as part of the annual report submission in accordance
with the new requirements. Separate submission of the information will
no longer be required when FDA has a method of extracting the relevant
information from annual reports.
III. Comments on the Proposed Rule and FDA's Responses
We received four comments in response to the proposed rule.
Comments were received from individual consumers and industry
organizations. A summary of the comments received and our responses
follow.
A. General Comments
(Comment 1) Two comments generally supported the proposed rule. One
of these comments urged FDA to require submission of additional
information, such as the brand name associated with the authorized
generic drug and whether a prescription is required, for inclusion on
the list of authorized generic drugs.
(Response) FDA appreciates the supportive comments. Regarding the
submission of additional information suggested by the commenter, note
that this final rule requires, as we proposed, that annual reports list
the date each authorized generic drug entered the market, the date each
authorized generic drug ceased being distributed, and the corresponding
trade or brand name. We do not believe it is necessary to also require
prescription status to be reported to FDA and included on the list
because such information is easily obtained from product labeling or
other publicly available sources if the trade name is known. The
information required to be reported under new Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b)
of the regulations tracks the requirements of section 505(t) of the act
and adequately informs the public of the marketing of an authorized
generic drug. Thus, we decline to adopt the suggestion to require
submission of prescription status information.
(Comment 2) One comment requested that we clarify the contents of
the required submission, particularly with regard to distribution data
that is required to be submitted under current Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)
with the annual report.
(Response) As stated in section II of this document, the
information we are requiring be submitted separately for authorized
generic drugs is the date each authorized generic drug entered the
market, the date each authorized generic drug ceased being distributed,
and the corresponding trade or brand name. Current Sec.
314.81(b)(2)(ii) requires that distribution data about a drug product
marketed under an approved NDA be submitted with the annual report. In
the codified of this final rule, Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii) is renumbered
as Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(a), but otherwise remains unchanged.
Distribution data is not required to be separately submitted under this
rule for inclusion on the authorized generic drug list.
B. Comments on Electronic Submission
(Comment 3) One comment requested clarification about electronic
submission of the required information. Another comment urged speedy
adoption of an electronic means for submission of the required
information.
(Comment 4) One comment opposed the provision requiring separate
submission of the required information by mail in either hard copy or
electronic format. The comment stated that this provision is contrary
to FDA's long-standing record of encouraging and facilitating
electronic regulatory submissions and to its goal to use information
technology to facilitate the application and review processes. The
commenter believes that for annual reports currently submitted in
electronic format, FDA should not require separate submission of the
authorized generic information to the Office of Pharmaceutical Science.
(Response) The purpose of this rule is to facilitate FDA's
obligation to accurately report a complete list of all authorized
generic drugs included in annual reports and to update the list in a
timely fashion. To fulfill our obligation, we need ready access to the
required information. Therefore, in this final rule, we are requiring
that the section 505(t) of the act information be separately sent to
us, as proposed. However, in response to the comments, we have modified
the language in Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) to provide that the
authorized generics information may also be submitted to FDA using e-
mail, in lieu of sending the information by regular mail or courier.
FDA believes this will provide an alternative method of submission that
may be more convenient for some sponsors. We encourage sponsors that
currently elect to submit their annual reports in electronic format to
continue to do so. At such time that electronic submission of annual
reports is mandated by FDA and FDA develops the capability to readily
retrieve information it needs to comply with section 505(t) of the act,
separate submission of the authorized generic information will no
longer be necessary, and the language in Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) of
the codified has been clarified to reflect this. Until electronic
submission of annual reports is required and FDA can readily retrieve
the authorized generics information from the annual reports database,
sponsors must submit the authorized generics information separately by
regular mail or e-mail (regardless of
[[Page 37166]]
what format the sponsor currently uses to submit its annual report).
C. Comment on Effective Date
(Comment 5) One comment opposed the proposed rule because it does
not ``prioritize collection of information on currently distributed
authorized generic drugs.'' The commenter suggested that FDA first
require sponsors to report information about currently distributed
authorized generic drugs and, at a later stage, require reporting of
information on authorized generic drugs marketed after 1999 but
subsequently discontinued. The same commenter requested that FDA
provide for an effective date that would allow sponsors time for
advance planning, revision of operating procedures governing
preparation of annual reports, and review of historical records.
(Response) We have adopted an effective date of 6 months after
publication of this final rule. We believe that 6 months will allow
time for advance planning, revision of operating procedures, and any
review of historical records that would be necessary to collect the
required information on marketing of authorized generic drugs since
1999 that must be reported under new Sec. 314.81(b)(ii)(b) of the
regulations. Because we have adopted an effective date that permits
adequate time for manufacturers/sponsors to collect and report
information on both currently marketed authorized generic drugs and
authorized generic drugs marketed since 1999, it is not necessary to
adopt the two-stage reporting process recommended by the commenter.
Accordingly, we decline to revise the final rule to adopt such a
process.
D. Comment on Definition
(Comment 6) One comment stated that the definition of authorized
generic drugs adopted in this rule has the effect of requiring the
reporting of certain products (and capturing these products on the
published list) that Congress did not intend to be reported as
authorized generic drugs or included on a list of authorized generic
drugs. The comment further stated that capturing and listing products
that Congress does not consider authorized generic drugs complicates
and slows the efficient and timely use of the information. The
commenter urged FDA to exercise its enforcement discretion to collect
information only for products that Congress considers authorized
generic drugs.
(Response) The definition of authorized generic drugs we proposed
is substantially identical to the definition Congress provided in
section 505(t) of the act. Absent some clear indication that Congress
did not intend to include in the scope of section 505(t) certain
products which clearly fall within the plain language of the
definition, it would be inappropriate for FDA to narrow or otherwise
alter the statutory definition of authorized generic drug. FDA's
mandate is to publish a complete list of authorized generic drugs as
defined in section 505(t) of the act, and to update the list quarterly.
Accordingly, we decline to adopt the commenter's suggestion to revise
the definition of authorized generic drugs to collect information about
a narrower range of products than Congress specified in the act.
IV. Legal Authority
The act, as amended by FDAAA, provides authority for FDA to issue
this final rule. Section 505(t) of the act requires that FDA publish a
complete list of all authorized generic drugs included in an annual
report submitted to the agency after January 1, 1999, and to update
that list quarterly. In addition, section 701(a) of the act (21 U.S.C.
371(a)) provides general authority for FDA to issue regulations for the
efficient enforcement of the act. This final rule amends FDA's existing
regulations regarding annual reports to ensure that the information
necessary for the agency to fulfill its obligation under section 505(t)
is clearly reported.
V. Environmental Impact
The agency has determined under 21 CFR part 25 that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
VI. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive
Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). Executive
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that
this final rule is not a significant regulatory action under the
Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because this final rule imposes only minimal
regulatory obligations, the agency certifies that the final rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $130 million, using the most current (2007) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
final rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
The only costs of this final rule are associated with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) burden, described in section VII of
this document. If we assume an average hourly wage plus benefits of $56
for the reporting personnel, the annual cost is about $29,000 ($56 per
hour x 520 hours).
VII. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains information collection provisions that are
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The title, description, and respondent
description of the information collection provisions are shown with an
estimate of the annual reporting and recordkeeping burden in table 1 of
this document. Included in the estimate is the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing each
collection of information.
Title: Applications for FDA Approval to Market a New Drug;
Postmarketing Reports; Reporting Information About Authorized Generic
Drugs
Description: This rulemaking requires the holder of an NDA to
notify the agency if an authorized generic drug is marketed by clearly
including this information in annual reports in an easily accessible
place and by sending a copy of the relevant portion of the annual
reports to a central contact point. We are taking this action as part
of our implementation of FDAAA, which
[[Page 37167]]
requires that FDA publish a list of all authorized generic drugs
included in an annual report after January 1, 1999, and that the agency
update the list quarterly. We initially published this list on June 27,
2008, on the Internet and notified relevant Federal agencies that the
list was published, and we will continue to update it.
Description of Respondents: Current holders of an NDA under which
an authorized generic drug was marketed during the time period covered
by an annual report submitted after January 1, 1999.
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21 CFR Number of Annual frequency Total annual Hours per
314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) respondents per response responses response Total hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authorized generic 60 6.7 400 1 hour 400
drug information in
the first annual
report submitted
after the
implementation of
Sec.
314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authorized generic 60 6.7 400 15 minutes 100
drug information
submitted in each
subsequent annual
report
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The submission of a 60 6.7 400 3 minutes 20
copy of that
portion of each
annual report
containing
authorized generic
drug information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
During the past several years, FDA has been reviewing annual
reports it has received under Sec. 314.81(b)(2) to discern whether an
authorized generic drug is being marketed by the NDA holder. Based on
information learned from this review and based on the number of annual
reports the agency currently receives under Sec. 314.81(b)(2), we
estimate that, after the implementation of Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b),
we will receive approximately 400 annual reports containing the
information required under Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for authorized
generic drugs that were marketed during the time period covered by an
annual report submitted after January 1, 1999. Based on the number of
sponsors that currently submit all annual reports, we estimate that
approximately 60 sponsors will submit these 400 annual reports with
authorized generics. As indicated in table 1 of this document, we are
estimating that the same number of annual reports will be submitted
each subsequent year from the same number of sponsors containing the
information required under Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b), and that the same
number of copies of that portion of each annual report containing the
authorized generic drug information will be submitted from the same
number of sponsors. Concerning the hours per response, based on our
estimate of 40 hours to prepare each annual report currently submitted
under Sec. 314.81(b)(2), we estimate that sponsors will need
approximately 1 hour to prepare the information required under Sec.
314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for each authorized generic drug that was marketed
during the time period covered by an annual report submitted after
January 1, 1999; approximately 15 minutes to prepare the information
required under Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for each subsequent annual
report; and approximately 3 minutes to submit to FDA a copy of that
portion of each annual report containing the authorized generic drug
information.
The information collection provisions of this final rule have been
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as
required by section 3507(d) of the PRA. Prior to the effective date of
this final rule, FDA will publish a notice in the Federal Register
announcing OMB's decision to approve, modify, or disapprove the
information collection provisions in this final rule. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
VIII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule
does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Accordingly, the agency has concluded
that the rule does not contain policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 314
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Drugs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
314 is amended as follows:
PART 314--APPLICATIONS FOR FDA APPROVAL TO MARKET A NEW DRUG
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 314 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 355, 356, 356a,
356b, 356c, 371, 374, 379e.
0
2. Section 314.3 is amended in paragraph (b) by alphabetically adding
the definition for ``authorized generic drug'' to read as follows:
Sec. 314.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Authorized generic drug means a listed drug, as defined in this
section, that has been approved under section 505(c) of the act and is
marketed, sold, or distributed directly or indirectly to retail class
of trade with labeling, packaging (other than repackaging as the listed
drug in blister packs, unit doses, or similar packaging for use in
institutions), product code, labeler code, trade name, or trademark
that differs from that of the listed drug.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 314.81 is amended by redesignating paragraph (b)(2)(ii) as
[[Page 37168]]
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(a) and by adding new paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(b) as
follows:
Sec. 314.81 Other postmarketing reports.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(b) Authorized generic drugs. If applicable, the date each
authorized generic drug (as defined in Sec. 314.3) entered the market,
the date each authorized generic drug ceased being distributed, and the
corresponding trade or brand name. Each dosage form and/or strength is
a different authorized generic drug and should be listed separately.
The first annual report submitted on or after January 25, 2010 must
include the information listed in this paragraph for any authorized
generic drug that was marketed during the time period covered by an
annual report submitted after January 1, 1999. If information is
included in the annual report with respect to any authorized generic
drug, a copy of that portion of the annual report must be sent to the
Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Office of New Drug Quality Assessment, Bldg. 21, rm. 2562, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, and marked ``Authorized
Generic Submission'' or, by e-mail, to the Authorized Generics
electronic mailbox at AuthorizedGenerics@fda.hhs.gov with ``Authorized
Generic Submission'' indicated in the subject line. However, at such
time that FDA has required that annual reports be submitted in an
electronic format, the information required by this paragraph must be
submitted as part of the annual report, in the electronic format
specified for submission of annual reports at that time, and not as a
separate submission under the preceding sentence in this paragraph.
* * * * *
Dated: April 7, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-17963 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S