Contingent Fees Under Circular 230, 37183-37185 [E9-17743]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
General exemptions. [Reserved]
§ 515.12
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 515.11
Specific exemptions.
(a) The following systems of records
are exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d),
(e)(1) and (f):
(1) Indian Gaming Individuals
Records System.
(2) Management Contract Individuals
Record System.
(b) The exemptions under paragraph
(a) of this section apply only to the
extent that information in these systems
is subject to exemption under 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2). When compliance would not
appear to interfere with or adversely
affect the overall responsibilities of the
Commission, with respect to licensing
of key employees and primary
management officials for employment in
an Indian gaming operation, the
applicable exemption may be waived by
the Commission.
(c) Exemptions from the particular
sections are justified for the following
reasons:
(1) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), because
making available the accounting of
disclosures to an individual who is the
subject of a record could reveal
investigative interest. This would
permit the individual to take measures
to destroy evidence, intimidate potential
witnesses, or flee the area to avoid the
investigation.
(2) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(d), (e)(1), and
(f) concerning individual access to
records, when such access could
compromise classified information
related to national security, interfere
with a pending investigation or internal
inquiry, constitute an unwarranted
invasion of privacy, reveal a sensitive
investigative technique, or pose a
potential threat to the Commission or its
employees or to law enforcement
personnel. Additionally, access could
reveal the identity of a source who
provided information under an express
promise of confidentiality.
(3) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(2), because
to require the Commission to amend
information thought to be incorrect,
irrelevant, or untimely, because of the
nature of the information collected and
the length of time it is maintained,
would create an impossible
administrative and investigative burden
by continually forcing the Commission
to resolve questions of accuracy,
relevance, timeliness, and
completeness.
(4) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) because:
(i) It is not always possible to
determine relevance or necessity of
specific information in the early stages
of an investigation.
(ii) Relevance and necessity are
matters of judgment and timing in that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:15 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
what appears relevant and necessary
when collected may be deemed
unnecessary later. Only after
information is assessed can its relevance
and necessity be established.
(iii) In any investigation the
Commission may receive information
concerning violations of law under the
jurisdiction of another agency. In the
interest of effective law enforcement
and under 25 U.S.C. 2716(b), the
information could be relevant to an
investigation by the Commission.
(iv) In the interviewing of individuals
or obtaining evidence in other ways
during an investigation, the Commission
could obtain information that may or
may not appear relevant at any given
time; however, the information could be
relevant to another investigation by the
Commission.
Dated: June 21, 2009.
Philip N. Hogen,
Chairman.
Norman DesRosiers,
Vice Chairman.
[FR Doc. E9–17745 Filed 7–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Secretary
31 CFR Part 10
[REG–113289–08]
RIN 1545–BH81
Contingent Fees Under Circular 230
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary,
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
SUMMARY: This document proposes
modifications of the regulations
governing practice before the Internal
Revenue Service (Circular 230). These
proposed regulations affect individuals
who practice before the IRS. The
proposed amendments modify the rules
relating to contingent fees under
Circular 230. This document also
provides notice of a public hearing on
the proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronically
generated comments must be received
by September 10, 2009. Outlines of
topics to be discussed at the public
hearing scheduled for November 20,
2009 at 10 a.m. must be received by
September 10, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–113289–08), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37183
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–113289–
08), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC, or sent
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (IRS and REG–
113289–08). The public hearing will be
held in Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Amy L. Mielke at (202) 622–4940;
concerning submissions of comments
and the public hearing, Regina Johnson
at (202) 622–7180; (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 330 of title 31 of the United
States Code authorizes the Secretary of
the Treasury to regulate practice before
the Treasury Department. The Secretary
has published the regulations in
Circular 230 (31 CFR part 10). On
September 26, 2007, the Treasury
Department and the IRS published final
regulations in the Federal Register (72
FR 54540) modifying rules governing
the general standards of practice before
the IRS, including the rules relating to
contingent fees in § 10.27 of Circular
230. Section 10.27 of the final
regulations generally precludes a
practitioner from charging a contingent
fee for services rendered in connection
with any matter before the Internal
Revenue Service, including the
preparation or filing of a tax return,
amended tax return or claim for refund
or credit. The final regulations,
however, permit a practitioner to charge
a contingent fee for services rendered in
connection with the IRS examination of,
or challenge to: (i) An original tax
return, or (ii) an amended return or
claim for refund or credit when the
amended return or claim for refund or
credit was filed within 120 days of the
taxpayer receiving a written notice of
the examination of, or a written
challenge to, the original tax return. The
final regulations also permit a
practitioner to charge a contingent fee
for services rendered in connection with
a claim for refund or credit of interest
and penalties assessed by the IRS, and
for services rendered in connection with
a judicial proceeding arising under the
Internal Revenue Code. The final
amendments to § 10.27 made by the
final regulations apply to fee
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
37184
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
arrangements entered into after March
26, 2008.
Section 406 of the Tax Relief and
Health Care Act of 2006, Public Law
109–432 (120 Stat. 2958) (December 20,
2006) (the Act) amended section 7623 of
the Internal Revenue Code concerning
the payment of awards to certain
persons who detect underpayments of
tax. Prior statutory authority to pay
awards at the discretion of the Secretary
was re-designated as section 7623(a),
and a new section 7623(b) was added to
the Code. Additional off-Code
provisions in section 406 of the Act
established a Whistleblower Office
within the IRS and addressed reward
program administration issues. See
Notice 2008–4, 2008–2 IRB 253, for
interim guidance applicable to award
claims submitted under the authority of
section 7623.
After consideration of comments
received following the publication of
the final regulations on contingent fees
and the Act, on March 26, 2008, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
published Notice 2008–43, 2008–15 IRB
748, providing interim guidance and
information concerning contingent fees
under Circular 230. The interim
guidance in Notice 2008–43 clarified
that § 10.27(b)(2)(ii) of Circular 230 does
not require the IRS to furnish a written
notice of examination to a taxpayer as
a prerequisite to a practitioner charging
a contingent fee for services rendered in
connection with an IRS examination of,
or challenge to, an amended return. The
interim guidance also clarified that
§ 10.27 permits practitioners to charge a
contingent fee with respect to
whistleblower claims under section
7623. The interim rules in Notice 2008–
43 are applicable to fee arrangements
entered into after March 26, 2008, and
will remain in effect until these
proposed regulations are finalized.
Explanation of Provisions
This document proposes
modifications to the standards for
contingent fees consistent with the
interim guidance provided in Notice
2008–43. Section 10.27 generally
prohibits a practitioner from charging a
contingent fee for services rendered in
connection with any matter before the
IRS. The primary rationales behind the
prohibition on contingent fees is to
preclude any fee arrangement that is
related to or requires a favorable ruling
by the IRS and that has the potential to
exploit the audit selection process or
compromise a practitioner’s duty of
independent judgment. Consistent with
the interim guidance provided in Notice
2008–43, proposed revisions to § 10.27
provide that a practitioner may charge a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:15 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
contingent fee in three limited
exceptions. Under proposed
§ 10.27(b)(2)(i) and (ii), a practitioner
may charge a contingent fee for services
rendered in connection with the IRS’s
examination of, or challenge to: (i) An
original tax return; or (ii) an amended
return or claim for refund or credit filed
before the taxpayer received a written
notice of examination of, or a written
challenge to, the original tax return (or
filed no later than 120 days after the
receipt of such written notice or written
challenge). The intent of this exception
is to discourage the tactical preparation
of a refund claim or amended return
filed late in the examination process.
The exception for contingent fee
arrangements with respect to an
amended return or claim for refund or
credit may be used if the amended
return or claim for refund or credit is
filed before the taxpayer receives
written notice of the examination or
written challenge to the original return
(or if the taxpayer never receives such
notice or writing) or within 120 days of
the taxpayer receiving the notice or
writing. For purposes of proposed
§ 10.27(b)(2)(ii), the 120 days is
computed from the earlier of a written
notice of the examination, if any, or a
written challenge to the original return.
Further, under proposed § 10.27(b)(3)
and (4), practitioners also may charge a
contingent fee for services rendered in
connection with a claim for refund or
credit of interest and penalties assessed
by the IRS, and for services rendered in
connection with a claim under section
7623.
In response to comments received
following the publication of the final
regulations on contingent fees, this
document also clarifies the definition of
a contingent fee in § 10.27(c)(1) to
provide that a contingent fee includes a
fee that is based on a percentage of the
refund reported on a return, that is
based on a percentage of the taxes
saved, or that otherwise depends on the
specific tax result attained. The
definition in § 10.27(c)(1) states that a
contingent fee depends on the specific
result attained without directly
providing that it is the specific tax result
that is relevant to the definition of a
contingent fee. Contingent fees based on
the closing of a transaction or other nontax contingencies do not present the
same concerns posed by tax-related
contingent fees. Accordingly, this
document clarifies the existing
definition to provide that a contingent
fee includes, but is not limited to, any
fee that depends on the specific tax
result obtained in any given transaction.
The scope of these regulations is
limited to the rules relating to
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
contingent fees under the general
standards of practice before the IRS.
These regulations do not alter or
supplant other ethical standards
applicable to practitioners.
Effect on Other Documents
Notice 2008–43, 2008–15 IRB 257,
will be obsolete when regulations
finalizing these proposed regulations are
published in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this
proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
is hereby certified that these regulations
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Persons authorized to practice
before the IRS have long been required
to comply with certain standards of
conduct. These regulations do not alter
the basic nature of the obligations and
responsibilities of these practitioners.
These regulations clarify when a
practitioner may charge a contingent fee
under § 10.27(b)(2) in response to public
comments. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is
not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f)
of the Internal Revenue Code, this
notice of proposed rulemaking will be
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small businesses.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before the regulations are adopted as
final regulations, consideration will be
given to any written comments (a signed
original and eight (8) copies) and
electronic comments that are submitted
timely to the IRS. The Treasury
Department and the IRS specifically
request comments on the clarity of the
proposed regulations and how they can
be made easier to understand. All
comments will be available for public
inspection and copying.
The public hearing is scheduled for
November 20, 2009, at 10 a.m., and will
be held in the Auditorium, Internal
Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Due to
building security procedures, visitors
must enter at the Constitution Avenue
entrance. All visitors must present
photo identification to enter the
building. Because of access restrictions,
visitors will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit written or electronic
comments by September 10, 2009 and
an outline of the topics to be discussed
and the time to be devoted to each topic
by September 10, 2009. A period of 10
minutes will be allocated to each person
for making comments.
An agenda showing the scheduling of
the speakers will be prepared after the
deadline for receiving outlines has
passed. Copies of the agenda will be
available free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of the
regulations is Amy L. Mielke of the
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration).
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 10
Accountants, Administrative practice
and procedure, Lawyers, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Taxes.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 31 CFR part 10 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for 31 CFR part 10 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Sec. 3, 23 Stat. 258, secs. 2–12,
60 Stat. 237 et seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301, 500, 551–
559; 31 U.S.C. 321; 31 U.S.C. 330; Reorg. Plan
No. 26 of 1950, 15 FR 4935, 64 Stat. 1280,
3 CFR, 1949–1953 Comp., p. 1017.
Paragraph. 2. Section 10.27 is
amended by revising paragraphs (b),
(c)(1), and (d), and by adding paragraph
(e) to read as follows:
§ 10.27
Fees.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Contingent fees—(1) Except as
provided in paragraphs (b)(2), (3), (4),
and (5) of this section, a practitioner
may not charge a contingent fee for
services rendered in connection with
any matter before the Internal Revenue
Service.
(2) A practitioner may charge a
contingent fee for services rendered in
connection with the Internal Revenue
Service’s examination of, or challenge
to—
(i) An original tax return; or
(ii) An amended return or claim for
refund or credit filed before the taxpayer
received a written notice of examination
of, or a written challenge to, the original
tax return; or filed no later than 120
days after the receipt of such written
notice or written challenge. The 120
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:15 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
days is computed from the earlier of a
written notice of the examination, if
any, or a written challenge to the
original return.
(3) A practitioner may charge a
contingent fee for services rendered in
connection with a claim for credit or
refund filed solely in connection with
the determination of statutory interest or
penalties assessed by the Internal
Revenue Service.
(4) A practitioner may charge a
contingent fee for services rendered in
connection with a claim under section
7623 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(5) A practitioner may charge a
contingent fee for services rendered in
connection with any judicial proceeding
arising under the Internal Revenue
Code.
(c) * * *
(1) Contingent fee is any fee that is
based, in whole or in part, on whether
or not a position taken on a tax return
or other filing avoids challenge by the
Internal Revenue Service or is sustained
either by the Internal Revenue Service
or in litigation. A contingent fee
includes a fee that is based on a
percentage of the refund reported on a
return, that is based on a percentage of
the taxes saved, or that otherwise
depends on the specific tax result
attained. A contingent fee also includes
any fee arrangement in which the
practitioner will reimburse the client for
all or a portion of the client’s fee in the
event that a position taken on a tax
return or other filing is challenged by
the Internal Revenue Service or is not
sustained, whether pursuant to an
indemnity agreement, a guarantee,
rescission rights, or any other
arrangement with a similar effect.
(2) * * *
(d) Applicability date. This section is
applicable to fee arrangements entered
into after March 26, 2008.
(e) Effective date. This section is
effective on the date that the final
regulations are published in the Federal
Register.
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E9–17743 Filed 7–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37185
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2009–0303(b); FRL–8936–
1]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; South Carolina;
Transportation Conformity
Memorandum of Agreement Update
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a revision to the South Carolina State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on
November 28, 2008, through the South
Carolina Department of Health and
Environmental Control. This revision
consists of transportation conformity
criteria and procedures related to
interagency consultation and
enforceability of certain transportationrelated control measures and mitigation
measures. The intended effect is to
update the transportation conformity
criteria and procedures in the South
Carolina SIP.
In the Final Rules Section of this
Federal Register, EPA is approving the
State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period
on this document. Any parties
interested in commenting on this
document should do so at this time.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2009–0303, by one of the
following methods:
a. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
b. E-mail: Wood.amanetta@epa.gov.
c. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
d. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2009–0303,
Air Quality Modeling and
Transportation Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 28, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37183-37185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17743]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Secretary
31 CFR Part 10
[REG-113289-08]
RIN 1545-BH81
Contingent Fees Under Circular 230
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes modifications of the regulations
governing practice before the Internal Revenue Service (Circular 230).
These proposed regulations affect individuals who practice before the
IRS. The proposed amendments modify the rules relating to contingent
fees under Circular 230. This document also provides notice of a public
hearing on the proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronically generated comments must be received by
September 10, 2009. Outlines of topics to be discussed at the public
hearing scheduled for November 20, 2009 at 10 a.m. must be received by
September 10, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-113289-08), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
113289-08), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, or sent electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (IRS and REG-113289-
08). The public hearing will be held in Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Amy L. Mielke at (202) 622-4940; concerning submissions of comments and
the public hearing, Regina Johnson at (202) 622-7180; (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 330 of title 31 of the United States Code authorizes the
Secretary of the Treasury to regulate practice before the Treasury
Department. The Secretary has published the regulations in Circular 230
(31 CFR part 10). On September 26, 2007, the Treasury Department and
the IRS published final regulations in the Federal Register (72 FR
54540) modifying rules governing the general standards of practice
before the IRS, including the rules relating to contingent fees in
Sec. 10.27 of Circular 230. Section 10.27 of the final regulations
generally precludes a practitioner from charging a contingent fee for
services rendered in connection with any matter before the Internal
Revenue Service, including the preparation or filing of a tax return,
amended tax return or claim for refund or credit. The final
regulations, however, permit a practitioner to charge a contingent fee
for services rendered in connection with the IRS examination of, or
challenge to: (i) An original tax return, or (ii) an amended return or
claim for refund or credit when the amended return or claim for refund
or credit was filed within 120 days of the taxpayer receiving a written
notice of the examination of, or a written challenge to, the original
tax return. The final regulations also permit a practitioner to charge
a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with a claim for
refund or credit of interest and penalties assessed by the IRS, and for
services rendered in connection with a judicial proceeding arising
under the Internal Revenue Code. The final amendments to Sec. 10.27
made by the final regulations apply to fee
[[Page 37184]]
arrangements entered into after March 26, 2008.
Section 406 of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, Public
Law 109-432 (120 Stat. 2958) (December 20, 2006) (the Act) amended
section 7623 of the Internal Revenue Code concerning the payment of
awards to certain persons who detect underpayments of tax. Prior
statutory authority to pay awards at the discretion of the Secretary
was re-designated as section 7623(a), and a new section 7623(b) was
added to the Code. Additional off-Code provisions in section 406 of the
Act established a Whistleblower Office within the IRS and addressed
reward program administration issues. See Notice 2008-4, 2008-2 IRB
253, for interim guidance applicable to award claims submitted under
the authority of section 7623.
After consideration of comments received following the publication
of the final regulations on contingent fees and the Act, on March 26,
2008, the Treasury Department and the IRS published Notice 2008-43,
2008-15 IRB 748, providing interim guidance and information concerning
contingent fees under Circular 230. The interim guidance in Notice
2008-43 clarified that Sec. 10.27(b)(2)(ii) of Circular 230 does not
require the IRS to furnish a written notice of examination to a
taxpayer as a prerequisite to a practitioner charging a contingent fee
for services rendered in connection with an IRS examination of, or
challenge to, an amended return. The interim guidance also clarified
that Sec. 10.27 permits practitioners to charge a contingent fee with
respect to whistleblower claims under section 7623. The interim rules
in Notice 2008-43 are applicable to fee arrangements entered into after
March 26, 2008, and will remain in effect until these proposed
regulations are finalized.
Explanation of Provisions
This document proposes modifications to the standards for
contingent fees consistent with the interim guidance provided in Notice
2008-43. Section 10.27 generally prohibits a practitioner from charging
a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with any matter
before the IRS. The primary rationales behind the prohibition on
contingent fees is to preclude any fee arrangement that is related to
or requires a favorable ruling by the IRS and that has the potential to
exploit the audit selection process or compromise a practitioner's duty
of independent judgment. Consistent with the interim guidance provided
in Notice 2008-43, proposed revisions to Sec. 10.27 provide that a
practitioner may charge a contingent fee in three limited exceptions.
Under proposed Sec. 10.27(b)(2)(i) and (ii), a practitioner may charge
a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with the IRS's
examination of, or challenge to: (i) An original tax return; or (ii) an
amended return or claim for refund or credit filed before the taxpayer
received a written notice of examination of, or a written challenge to,
the original tax return (or filed no later than 120 days after the
receipt of such written notice or written challenge). The intent of
this exception is to discourage the tactical preparation of a refund
claim or amended return filed late in the examination process. The
exception for contingent fee arrangements with respect to an amended
return or claim for refund or credit may be used if the amended return
or claim for refund or credit is filed before the taxpayer receives
written notice of the examination or written challenge to the original
return (or if the taxpayer never receives such notice or writing) or
within 120 days of the taxpayer receiving the notice or writing. For
purposes of proposed Sec. 10.27(b)(2)(ii), the 120 days is computed
from the earlier of a written notice of the examination, if any, or a
written challenge to the original return. Further, under proposed Sec.
10.27(b)(3) and (4), practitioners also may charge a contingent fee for
services rendered in connection with a claim for refund or credit of
interest and penalties assessed by the IRS, and for services rendered
in connection with a claim under section 7623.
In response to comments received following the publication of the
final regulations on contingent fees, this document also clarifies the
definition of a contingent fee in Sec. 10.27(c)(1) to provide that a
contingent fee includes a fee that is based on a percentage of the
refund reported on a return, that is based on a percentage of the taxes
saved, or that otherwise depends on the specific tax result attained.
The definition in Sec. 10.27(c)(1) states that a contingent fee
depends on the specific result attained without directly providing that
it is the specific tax result that is relevant to the definition of a
contingent fee. Contingent fees based on the closing of a transaction
or other non-tax contingencies do not present the same concerns posed
by tax-related contingent fees. Accordingly, this document clarifies
the existing definition to provide that a contingent fee includes, but
is not limited to, any fee that depends on the specific tax result
obtained in any given transaction.
The scope of these regulations is limited to the rules relating to
contingent fees under the general standards of practice before the IRS.
These regulations do not alter or supplant other ethical standards
applicable to practitioners.
Effect on Other Documents
Notice 2008-43, 2008-15 IRB 257, will be obsolete when regulations
finalizing these proposed regulations are published in the Federal
Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It is hereby certified that
these regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Persons authorized to practice
before the IRS have long been required to comply with certain standards
of conduct. These regulations do not alter the basic nature of the
obligations and responsibilities of these practitioners. These
regulations clarify when a practitioner may charge a contingent fee
under Sec. 10.27(b)(2) in response to public comments. Therefore, a
regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, this notice of proposed rulemaking will be
submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its impact on small businesses.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before the regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written comments (a signed original
and eight (8) copies) and electronic comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS. The Treasury Department and the IRS specifically request
comments on the clarity of the proposed regulations and how they can be
made easier to understand. All comments will be available for public
inspection and copying.
The public hearing is scheduled for November 20, 2009, at 10 a.m.,
and will be held in the Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must enter at the Constitution Avenue entrance.
All visitors must present photo identification to enter the building.
Because of access restrictions, visitors will not be admitted beyond
the immediate entrance area more than 30 minutes before the hearing
starts. For information about having your name placed on the building
access list to
[[Page 37185]]
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing. Persons who
wish to present oral comments at the hearing must submit written or
electronic comments by September 10, 2009 and an outline of the topics
to be discussed and the time to be devoted to each topic by September
10, 2009. A period of 10 minutes will be allocated to each person for
making comments.
An agenda showing the scheduling of the speakers will be prepared
after the deadline for receiving outlines has passed. Copies of the
agenda will be available free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of the regulations is Amy L. Mielke of the
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 10
Accountants, Administrative practice and procedure, Lawyers,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Taxes.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 31 CFR part 10 is proposed to be amended as follows:
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for 31 CFR part 10 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 3, 23 Stat. 258, secs. 2-12, 60 Stat. 237 et
seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301, 500, 551-559; 31 U.S.C. 321; 31 U.S.C. 330;
Reorg. Plan No. 26 of 1950, 15 FR 4935, 64 Stat. 1280, 3 CFR, 1949-
1953 Comp., p. 1017.
Paragraph. 2. Section 10.27 is amended by revising paragraphs (b),
(c)(1), and (d), and by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 10.27 Fees.
* * * * *
(b) Contingent fees--(1) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2),
(3), (4), and (5) of this section, a practitioner may not charge a
contingent fee for services rendered in connection with any matter
before the Internal Revenue Service.
(2) A practitioner may charge a contingent fee for services
rendered in connection with the Internal Revenue Service's examination
of, or challenge to--
(i) An original tax return; or
(ii) An amended return or claim for refund or credit filed before
the taxpayer received a written notice of examination of, or a written
challenge to, the original tax return; or filed no later than 120 days
after the receipt of such written notice or written challenge. The 120
days is computed from the earlier of a written notice of the
examination, if any, or a written challenge to the original return.
(3) A practitioner may charge a contingent fee for services
rendered in connection with a claim for credit or refund filed solely
in connection with the determination of statutory interest or penalties
assessed by the Internal Revenue Service.
(4) A practitioner may charge a contingent fee for services
rendered in connection with a claim under section 7623 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
(5) A practitioner may charge a contingent fee for services
rendered in connection with any judicial proceeding arising under the
Internal Revenue Code.
(c) * * *
(1) Contingent fee is any fee that is based, in whole or in part,
on whether or not a position taken on a tax return or other filing
avoids challenge by the Internal Revenue Service or is sustained either
by the Internal Revenue Service or in litigation. A contingent fee
includes a fee that is based on a percentage of the refund reported on
a return, that is based on a percentage of the taxes saved, or that
otherwise depends on the specific tax result attained. A contingent fee
also includes any fee arrangement in which the practitioner will
reimburse the client for all or a portion of the client's fee in the
event that a position taken on a tax return or other filing is
challenged by the Internal Revenue Service or is not sustained, whether
pursuant to an indemnity agreement, a guarantee, rescission rights, or
any other arrangement with a similar effect.
(2) * * *
(d) Applicability date. This section is applicable to fee
arrangements entered into after March 26, 2008.
(e) Effective date. This section is effective on the date that the
final regulations are published in the Federal Register.
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E9-17743 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P