Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for Limnanthes floccosa, 37314-37392 [E9-17522]
Download as PDF
37314
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018–AW21
[Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2009–0046]
[92210 1117–0000–B4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Proposed Designation of
Critical Habitat for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora (LargeFlowered Woolly Meadowfoam) and
Lomatium cookii (Cook’s Lomatium)
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
designate critical habitat for two plants,
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
(large-flowered woolly meadowfoam)
and Lomatium cookii (Cook’s lomatium)
under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (Act). We are
proposing to designate 2,561 hectares
(ha) (6,327 acres (ac)) as critical habitat
for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
in Jackson County, Oregon, and 2,875 ha
(7,104 ac) as critical habitat for
Lomatium cookii in Jackson and
Josephine Counties, Oregon. The total
critical habitat area proposed in this
rule, including critical habitat units that
overlap for the two species, is 4,467 ha
(11,038 ac).
DATES: To provide us with adequate
time to consider your comments, please
ensure that we receive them on or before
September 28, 2009. We must receive
requests for public hearings, in writing,
at the address shown in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
September 11, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
and materials concerning this proposal
by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments to
Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2009–0046.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No.
FWS–R1–ES–2009–0046; Division of
Policy and Directives Management; U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N.
Fairfax Drive, Suite 222; Arlington, VA
22203.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Comments section below for
more information).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Henson, State Supervisor, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and
Wildlife Office, 2600 SE 98th Avenue,
Suite 100, Portland, OR 97266
(telephone 503–231–6179; facsimile
503–231–6195). If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
We intend that any final action
resulting from this proposal will be as
accurate and as effective as possible.
Therefore, comments or suggestions
from the public, other concerned
governmental agencies, the scientific
community, industry, or any other
interested party concerning this
proposed rule are hereby solicited. We
particularly seek comments concerning:
(1) The reasons why we should or
should not designate areas as ‘‘critical
habitat’’ under section 4 of the Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including whether
there are threats to Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii
from human activity, the degree of
which can be expected to increase due
to the designation, and whether the
benefit of designation would outweigh
threats to the species caused by the
designation, such that the designation of
critical habitat is prudent.
(2) Specific information on:
• The amount and distribution of
habitat for the species included in this
proposed rule;
• What areas occupied at the time of
listing, and that contain physical and
biological features essential for the
conservation of the species, we should
include and why;
• What areas not occupied at the time
of listing that are essential to the
conservation of the species we should
include and why; and
• Special management considerations
or protection that the proposed critical
habitat may require.
(3) Specific information on
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii and the habitat
components (physical and biological
features) essential to the conservation of
these species, such as soil moisture
gradient, microsite preferences, and
light requirements.
(4) Any information on the biological
or ecological requirements of these
species.
(5) Land-use designations and current
or planned activities in areas occupied
by the species, and their possible
impacts on the species and the proposed
critical habitat.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(6) Any foreseeable economic,
national security, or other potential
impacts resulting from the proposed
designation and, in particular, any
impacts on small entities and the
benefits of including or excluding areas
that are subject to these impacts.
(7) Whether the benefits of excluding
any particular area from critical habitat
outweigh the benefits of including that
area as critical habitat under section
4(b)(2) of the Act, after considering the
potential impacts and benefits of the
proposed critical habitat designation.
(8) Whether our approach to
designating critical habitat could be
improved or modified in any way to
provide for greater public participation
and understanding, or to assist us in
accommodating public concerns and
comments.
You may submit your comments and
materials concerning this proposed rule
by one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section. If you submit a
comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment—including any personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the website. If you submit a
hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
We will post all hardcopy comments on
https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
used in preparing this proposed rule,
will be available for public inspection at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by
appointment, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
You may obtain copies of the
proposed rule by mail from the Oregon
Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) or by
visiting the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov.
Background
Species Information
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii were listed as
endangered species under the Act in
2002 (67 FR 68004; November 7, 2002).
In this proposed rule, we intend to
discuss only those topics directly
relevant to the designation of critical
habitat for these two species. For
detailed information on the taxonomy
and biology of L. f. ssp. grandiflora and
L. cookii, please refer to the final listing
rule published in the Federal Register
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
on November 7, 2002 (67 FR 68004) and
the Draft Recovery Plan for Listed
Species of the Rogue Valley Vernal Pool
and Illinois Valley Wet Meadow
Ecosystems (USFWS 2006, pp. II-1 to II17).
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii are endemic to
seasonal wetland habitats of
southwestern Oregon. L. F. ssp.
grandiflora is restricted to Jackson
County in the Rogue River Valley,
where it co-occurs with Lomatium
cookii in several areas near White City
in an area known as the Agate Desert
(ONHP 1997, p. 3; Huddleston 2001, p.
11). Lomatium cookii occurs in two
disjunct locations: (1) in the Rogue
River Valley, near the towns of Medford,
White City, and Eagle Point; and (2) in
the Illinois River Valley of Josephine
County near the towns of Selma, Cave
Junction, and O’Brien (ONHDB 1994, p.
5). The two locations are separated by
approximately 48 kilometers (km) (30
miles (mi)).
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora,
commonly known as large-flowered
woolly meadowfoam, is a small, annual
forb (broad-leaved herb) in the false
mermaid family (Limnanthaceae). The
subspecies produces yellowish-white
flowers that bloom in April and May
and reaches a height of 15 centimeters
(cm) (6 inches (in)) (Meinke 1982, p.
202). L. f. ssp. grandiflora is
distinguished from the more common L.
f. ssp. floccosa (common woolly
meadowfoam) by its larger, sparserhaired calyxes (outer flower bracts),
which typically produce a single flower
per pedicel (flower stalk) (Kalin-Arroyo
1973, p. 188; USFWS 2006, pp. II-1–II3). In contrast, L. f. ssp. floccosa
typically produces smaller flowers with
densely whitish and woolly haired
calyxes; the flowers are formed in
clusters. L. f. ssp. grandiflora occurs on
the floor of the Middle Rogue River
Basin in Jackson County in vernal pool–
mounded prairie habitat (rain-fed
seasonal wetlands in prairie
characterized by gentle mound-swale
topography) (Kalin-Arroyo 1973, p. 188;
ONHP 1997, p. 4; USFWS 2006, pp. II1–II-3).
Lomatium cookii, commonly known
as Cook’s lomatium or Cook’s desert
parsley, is a perennial, tap-rooted forb
in the parsley family (Apiaceae) that
produces light-yellow flowers from late
March to May and reaches a height of
50 cm (20 in). This species is
distinguished from the more common
Lomatium utriculatum (foothill desert
parsley) by having narrow bracts under
the flower umbels (flower clusters),
producing paler yellow flowers, and by
typically lacking leaves on the flowering
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
stems (Kagan 1986, pp. 73-74; USFWS
2006, pp. II-15–II-17). Lomatium cookii
is associated with vernal pool–mounded
prairie habitat, but also occurs in
seasonally wet meadow habitat in forest
openings (ONHDB 1994, pp. 9–10).
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii are both
associated with the remaining relatively
undisturbed vernal pool–mounded
prairie habitat in the Middle Rogue
River Basin’s Agate Desert
(Environmental Science Associates
(ESA) 2007, p. 2-1; ONHP 1997, p. 3).
Relative to the pools, the plants often
occur in pool margins, or less often on
both mound tops and depression
bottoms of less intact vernal pools.
The substrate underlying the vernal
pool topography in the Middle Rogue
River Valley is primarily basalt within
a matrix of thick clay soil, which creates
a hardpan or duripan layer (mineral soil
horizons relatively impervious to
water). During fall and winter rains,
water collects in shallow depressions of
the vernal pool–mounded prairie
habitat. Downward percolation of water
is prevented by the presence of the
duripan layer located from 0.18 to 0.75
meters (m) (0.6 to 2.5 feet (ft)) below the
soil surface (Keeley and Zedler 1998, p.
2; Huddleston 2001, pp. 14–15). In areas
north and northwest of Medford, the
vicinity of White City, and north along
low-elevation plains, L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii occur
on alluvial soils, primarily mapped as
Agate-Winlo complex soils, but also
occasionally on mapped Coker clay and
Provig-Agate complex soils with 0 to 3
percent slopes. L. f. ssp. grandiflora also
occasionally occurs on soils mapped as
Carney clay and Winlo very gravelly
loam in vernal pool habitat north of
White City (USDA 2006b).
In the Agate Desert, the two plants are
associated with microhabitats occupied
by mostly annual native forbs and
graminoids (grass-like plants), including
Alopecurus geniculatus (water foxtail),
Deschampsia danthonioides (slender
hairgrass), Eryngium petiolatum
(Oregon coyote thistle), Trifolium
depauperatum (poverty clover),
Myosurus minimus (tiny mouse-tail),
Navarretia leucocephala ssp.
leucocephala (white-head navarretia),
Lasthenia californica (California
goldfields), Phlox gracilis (slender
phlox), Plagiobothrys bracteatus
(bracted popcornflower), and Triteleia
hyacinthina (white brodiaea) (OSU
2007); USFWS 2006, p. II-6). The vernal
pool habitat occupied by Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora in the Agate
Desert ranges from 372 to 469 m (1,220
to 1540 ft) in elevation (Huddleston
2001, p. 11; USGS 2002). The vernal
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37315
pool habitat occupied by Lomatium
cookii in the same basin area ranges
from 372 to 411 m (1,220 to 1,350 ft) in
elevation (Huddleston 2001, p. 11;
USGS 2009).
The habitats occupied by Lomatium
cookii in the Illinois River Valley are
more complex than the Rogue River
Valley in both soil composition and soil
depth. Lomatium cookii occurs on 17
mapped soil types in the Illinois River
Valley. The majority of Lomatium cookii
occurrences in the Illinois River Valley
are found on Brockman clay loam,
Josephine gravelly loam, and Pollard
loam (USDA 2008). Unlike the Middle
Rogue River Basin soils, many of the
Lomatium cookii-occupied soil types
originate from stream-fed alluvium
covering sedimentary or ultramafic
rocks (ONHDB 1994, pp. 9–10).
Ultramafic rock is a class of rock that is
low in calcium and high in iron and
magnesium and is often toxic to plants
(Brady et al. 2005, p. 246). Pollard loam
and Speaker-Josephine gravelly loam
soils originate from non-ultramafic
sources, while Brockman soil and most
others types originate from ultramafic
parent material (Silvernail and Meinke
2008, pp. 9–10).
Lomatium cookii plants exhibit a
slightly different morphology in the
Illinois River Valley than in the Rogue
River Basin. Compared with Agate
Desert plants, Illinois River Valley
Lomatium cookii plants are less robust,
have smaller plant dimensions, and
have fewer numbers of floral units.
Plants in the two areas also exhibit
differences in floral and fruit
morphology, seed length, the number of
umbels (flower groups), length of
peduncle (flower stalk), number of
central umbellets (sub-flower groups)
per umbel, and number of staminate
flowers (male flowers) per peripheral
and central umbellet (Silvernail and
Meinke 2008, pp. 30–31).
In the Illinois River Valley, Lomatium
cookii is known from six general areas
along a 29-km (18-mi) stretch of the
Illinois River within the large serpentine
sheet composed of ultramafic rock that
covers the central and southwestern
portion of Josephine County. Within
this landform, Lomatium cookii occurs
only in areas with alluvial silts or clays
that have been deposited over the
ultramafic bedrock (ONHDB 1994, p. 9).
In the Illinois River Valley, Lomatium
cookii occurs in elevations that range
from 383 to 488 m (1,256 to 1,600 ft)
(USGS 2009).
Habitat occupied by Lomatium cookii
in the Illinois Valley is primarily
seasonally wet grassland meadows, on
flats and slopes in mixed oak-conifer
forested meadows, streambanks, or
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37316
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
forest openings, dominated by native
grasses, including: Danthonia
californica (California oatgrass), Poa
secunda (rough bluegrass),
Deschampsia cespitosa (tufted
hairgrass), Festuca roemeri var.
klamathensis (Klamath Roemer’s
fescue), Achnatherum lemmonii
(Lemmon’s needlegrass) and
Deschampsia danthonioides. Native
forbs include Camassia spp. (camas),
Ranunculus occidentalis (western
buttercup), and Limnanthes gracilis var.
gracilis (slender meadowfoam) (ONHDB
1994, p. 9). The seasonally wet
meadows occupied by Lomatium cookii
in the Illinois River Valley usually occur
as part of bottomland Quercus
garryana–Quercus kelloggii–Pinus
ponderosa (Oregon white oak–California
black oak–ponderosa pine) savannas.
Widely spaced, large pine trees are
characteristic of the open meadow
habitat with mixed pine and oak
woodlands occurring along seasonal
creeks.
At the time of listing in 2002,
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
was known from 15 distinct occurrences
and Lomatium cookii was known from
36 occurrences throughout their ranges
(67 FR 68004; November 7, 2002).
Currently L. f. ssp. grandiflora has 22
documented occurrences and Lomatium
cookii has 37 documented occurrences.
L. f. ssp. grandiflora is found only in
Jackson County, and is known from
Shady Cove, Hammel Road, two areas
northeast of Upper Table Rock, several
areas north of Eagle Point, the Agate
Reservoir, and at several vicinities in
and around White City including: the
Jackson County Sports Park (Hoover
Ponds), the Hall and Military Slough
tracks of the Denman Wildlife Area, on
City of Medford property, several areas
west of Whetstone Creek, and on several
private properties (OHNIC 2008; Service
database 2008). The four largest
population centers of L. f. ssp.
grandiflora include two areas in White
City, Whetstone Creek, and an area
northeast of Upper Table Rock. The
smallest L. f. ssp. grandiflora population
is known from an area just outside the
Rogue Valley International–Medford
Airport (Meyers 2008, p. 48).
Lomatium cookii occurs in both
Jackson County and Josephine County.
In Josephine County, where it is found
in seasonal wet meadow habitats,
Lomatium cookii has been reported from
six general areas: (1) the vicinity of
Selma; (2) the east base of Woodcock
Mountain; (3) Rough and Ready Creek;
(4) Illinois River Forks State Park; (5)
French Flat; and (6) Laurel Road
(ONHIC 2008; USFWS 2008). The six
largest population centers of Lomatium
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
cookii include two areas in French Flat,
Laurel Road, and near the east base of
Woodcock Mountain in Josephine
County; and at the Rogue Valley
International–Medford Airport and an
area in east White City in Jackson
County.
The two species co-occur in three
general areas in Jackson County: (1) the
vicinity of the Rogue International–
Medford Airport in Medford; (2) in and
around White City; and (3) areas west of
Whetstone Creek. Specific locations
where Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii are
found together have been reported in
the Rogue River Valley at the Rogue
Valley International–Medford Airport
and various locations in and around
White City including: the Jackson
County Sports Park, the Hall Track of
the Denman Wildlife Area, on City of
Medford property, several areas west of
Whetstone Creek, and on several private
properties in and around White City
(ONHIC 2008; USFWS 2008).
Lomatium cookii populations are
generally found in habitats not subject
to mining, agricultural development,
residential or commercial development,
and grazing (Oregon Natural Heritage
Information Center (ONHIC) database
2008). Although, historically, many of
these activities were thought to have
negative impacts on the species, there
are some notable exceptions, such as
grazing, which can be beneficial if
properly managed. At a few sites in
Jackson County, for example, annual
mowing, periodic burning, and grazing
are practiced and appear to be
compatible with survival and even
proliferation of Lomatium cookii
(Borgias 2004, p. 34). In fact, the largest
and most prolific Lomatium cookii
populations occur where compatible
grazing or mowing practices occur
repeatedly (Borgias 2004, p. 34).
Although intensive cattle grazing has a
significant negative impact, especially
combined with the effects of
competition with nonnative annual
grasses, evidence suggests that
Lomatium cookii is capable of persisting
under moderate grazing pressure (Brock
1987, pp. 23, 30). Timing of grazing is
also important, as grazing in the fall and
winter growing season would reduce
seed production by the plants (Brock
1987, p. 23). Sites occupied by
Lomatium cookii that receive no
management continue to support plant
populations, but monitoring suggests
that some of those populations are
declining (Kaye and Thorpe 2008, pp.
16–25). Borgias (2004, p. 34) observed
that, after several years without grazing
or a fire at The Nature Conservancy’s
Agate Desert Preserve, thatch
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
accumulated and recruitment of young
Lomatium cookii declined due to the
increases of nonnative annual grasses.
Other reports indicate that vegetative
succession, herbivory by voles (Microtus
spp.), or both, may be the cause of
declining populations (Kaye and Thorpe
2008, pp. 16–25).
Land uses associated with the largest,
more intact populations of Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii are vernal pool habitats managed
using compatible agricultural practices.
Actions conducive to large population
sizes of either of the two species may
include prescribed burns, controlled
grazing practices, or regular mowing.
The Rogue Valley International–
Medford Airport is an example of an
area that is mowed regularly to meet
Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) safety
requirements and that supports a large
and prolific Lomatium cookii
population that extends over 28 ha (70
ac) (R. Russell, pers. comm. 2004; S.
Friedman, pers. obs. 2009). Within
grazed properties, small isolated patches
of L. f. ssp. grandiflora often continue to
persist, perhaps due to suppression of
invasive nonnative grasses (Meyers
2008, pp. 1–48; Wildlands, Inc. 2008, p.
1; Borgias 2004, p. 42).
Threats
Threats to Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii in the
Rogue River Valley include: residential,
urban, and commercial development;
agricultural development (including
leveling, ditching, tilling, and stock
pond construction or water
impoundments); road construction and
maintenance; aggregate mining;
incompatible grazing practices; off-road
vehicle (ORV) use that affects surface
hydrology; vandalism (related to ORV
use); encroachment by nonnative plants;
and herbivory by gophers (family
Geomyidae) and voles (67 FR 68004;
Kaye and Thorpe, pp. 11–12).
• Residential, urban, agricultural,
mining, and commercial development
has resulted in an approximately 60
percent loss of the vernal pool
landscape in the Rogue River Valley due
to building construction, removal of
habitat, altered hydrology, or altered
topography (ONHP 1997, pp. 14–15;
Wille and Petersen 2006, p. 1993).
• Ground-disturbing activities, such as
road construction and maintenance or
ORV use, can damage the clay pan layer
and allow soil moisture to drain from
the vernal pools or wet meadow habitats
that the plants depend upon for
reproduction and survival. Incompatible
agricultural practices, including some
timber management and crop
management, can alter hydrology,
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
directly affect plants with equipment, or
indirectly affect plants as a result of
road construction. Road construction
can result in population fragmentation,
alteration of hydrology, or the covering
of plants by fill material, resulting in
degradation of habitat and direct loss of
plants.
• Vandalism refers to the intentional
disregard or dismantling of signing or
fencing intended to protect certain
wetland areas from unauthorized ORV
use, which may then result in negative
effects on the hydrology of the habitat.
• The removal of surface material in
conjunction with mining activities
results in the direct loss of habitats.
• Heavy grazing, especially from
October through April, would be an
example of incompatible grazing. The
majority of seasonal growth for these
two plants occurs during the winter,
and if plants are grazed during the fall
and winter months, they are less likely
to produce seed in the spring or early
summer (Brock 1987, p. 23). Vernal pool
hydrology may also be altered by the
compression and compaction
disturbance caused by grazing livestock.
Nonnative plants can outcompete and
displace native plant species and may
also inhibit successful germination of
seeds. Herbivory by gophers and voles
results in direct mortality of individual
plants, as well as an indirect decrease in
reproduction.
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii are also
threatened by encroachment of
nonnative annual herbs, including
Centaurea solstitialis (yellow starthistle)
and Cardaria draba (hoary cress), which
may competitively exclude the two
native species, as well as nonnative
annual grasses, namely Hordeum
marinum ssp. gussoneanum
(Mediterranean barley) and
Taeniantherum caput-medusae
(medusahead). Hordeum marinum ssp.
gussoneanum encroaches on
microhabitats occupied by both species,
but T. caput-medusae occurs on
adjacent upland mound habitats,
occasionally interfering with Lomatium
cookii germination and growth, or
stifling native plant growth in general.
Reproduction of both Lomatium cookii
and L. f. spp. grandiflora is impaired by
the presence of introduced annual
grasses, as seeds of both native species
are not able to germinate under the
dense thatch produced by nonnative
annual grasses. Recently introduced
nonnative invasive plants that are
particularly threatening to Lomatium
cookii in the Illinois Valley are Alyssum
murale (yellowtuft) and A. corsicum
(alisso di Corsica). These two plants
were recently introduced to serpentine
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
meadow habitat as part of an
experiment to test their ability to
accumulate nickel. Unfortunately the
plants have now begun to spread
rapidly across wide areas of serpentine
meadow in particularly dense
concentrations and threaten to encroach
upon and displace Lomatium cookii
populations in the Illinois Valley (ODA
and USFS 2008, pp. 1–3).
Threats to Lomatium cookii in the
Illinois Valley include aggregate and
mineral mining, residential and urban
development, impacts associated with
timber harvesting practices, road
construction and maintenance, ground
disturbance by ORV use that affects
surface hydrology, garbage dumping,
succession of native woody vegetation
due to fire suppression, incompatible
grazing practices, and herbivory by
gophers and voles; the effects of most of
these threats are described above. The
dumping of garbage, especially such
large items as old appliances, can
directly affect populations by crushing
or smothering them. Succession of
native woody vegetation, although a
natural process, is normally held in
check by fire. In the Illinois Valley, the
longer fire return intervals due to fire
suppression has led to the
encroachment of native woody
vegetation (trees and shrubs) into the
wet meadow habitats occupied by
Lomatium cookii. Such native woody
plants include: Ceanothus cuneatus
(buckbrush), Pinus ponderosa
(Ponderosa pine), Pinus jeffreyi (Jeffrey
pine), Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglasfir), and Toxicodendron diversiloba
(poison oak). The succession of these
species in Lomatium cookii habitat can
isolate the species into small refuge
pockets or cause widespread reduction
of habitat suitability by reducing light
availability (over-shading), limiting
water and nutrient availability,
fragmenting populations, and limiting
space to grow. Individuals of Lomatium
cookii growing in more shaded
conditions, as when surrounded by
shrubs, tend to be smaller and less
robust than plants growing in more
open areas in association with lower
growing grasses and forbs (ONHIC
2008).
Several long-term monitoring efforts
indicate that, at four protected locations
in the Rogue and Illinois River Valleys,
Lomatium cookii populations have
experienced declines (D. Borgias, pers.
comm. 2006; Kaye and Thorpe 2008, pp.
16–25). The causes are not specifically
known but appear to be due to
encroachment and over-shading from
the succession of natural vegetation or
increases in gopher and vole activity. At
two of the declining Lomatium cookii
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37317
populations, located at the French Flat
Area of Critical Environmental Concern
(ACEC), the Medford District of the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is
currently planning to arrest this decline
by reducing shrub and tree
encroachment (S. Fritts, pers. comm.
2009). At two Lomatium cookii
populations located on The Nature
Conservancy’s Agate Desert Preserve
and Whetstone Savanna Preserve,
planting of native bunchgrass, mowing,
and grazing are being considered to
address declining plant numbers (D.
Borgias, pers. comm. 2009).
Previous Federal Actions
For more information on Federal
actions concerning Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii
prior to their listing, please refer to the
final listing rule for the two plants
published in the Federal Register on
November 7, 2002 (67 FR 68004). At the
time of listing, critical habitat was not
designated for the two species due to
higher priorities at that time.
On December 19, 2007, the Center for
Biological Diversity filed a complaint
against the Service (Center for Biological
Diversity v. Kempthorne, et al., 07-CV2378 IEG, (S.D. CA)) for failure to
designate critical habitat for four plant
species, including Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii
(the other two species occur in different
regions). In a settlement agreement
reached on April 11, 2008, we agreed to
complete a critical habitat
determination for L. f. ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii in a single
rulemaking because they share similar
habitats. We agreed to submit a
proposed critical habitat rule for both L.
f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii
to the Federal Register by July 15, 2009,
and a final rule by July 15, 2010.
In 2003, critical habitat was
designated for the threatened vernal
pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi)
in California and the Rogue River Valley
of Oregon (68 FR 46683; August 6,
2003). The designated vernal pool fairy
shrimp critical habitat in Oregon
overlaps with approximately 2,101 ha
(5,192 ac) of suitable habitat for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and 799 ha (1,974 ac) of suitable habitat
for Lomatium cookii (68 FR 46683). The
vernal pool fairy shrimp critical habitat
designation resulted in additional
regulatory review for habitats occupied
by both L. f. ssp. grandiflora and
Lomatium cookii in most of Jackson
County due to the similarity and
location of the vernal pool–mounded
prairie habitat shared by these species.
In this proposed rule, we will note
where designated critical habitat for the
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37318
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
vernal pool fairy shrimp overlaps with
that proposed for L. f. ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii.
Prudency Determination
Section 4(a)(3) of the Act, as
amended, and implementing regulations
(50 CFR 424.12) require that, to the
maximum extent prudent and
determinable, we designate critical
habitat at the time the species is
determined to be endangered or
threatened. Our regulations (50 CFR
424.12(a)) further state that the
designation of critical habitat is not
prudent when one or both of the
following situations exist—(1) The
species is threatened by taking or other
human activity, and identification of
critical habitat can be expected to
increase the degree of threat to the
species, or (2) such designation of
critical habitat would not be beneficial
to the species.
There is no documentation that
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora or
Lomatium cookii are threatened by
taking or targeted human activities such
as collection. Since the publication of
the Draft Recovery Plan for Listed
Species of the Rogue Valley Vernal Pool
and Illinois Valley Wet Meadow
Ecosystems (draft recovery plan)
(USFWS 2006, pp. IV-13–IV-14) in 2006,
maps identifying core recovery areas for
L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii have been available to the public.
The core recovery areas included focal
areas where we anticipated conservation
and protection could result in recovery
of the two species. Most landowners
and collectors have been aware of the
location of general L. f. ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii occurrence
locations since publication of the draft
recovery plan in 2006. We do not have
any documentation that threats have
increased since these species were listed
and since the draft recovery plan was
published.
In the absence of evidence that the
designation of critical habitat would
increase threats to a species, if there are
any benefits to a critical habitat
designation, then a prudent finding is
warranted. The potential benefits of a
critical habitat designation include: (1)
Federal agency compliance with the
consultation requirements to avoid
destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat; (2) focusing
conservation activities on the most
essential features and areas; (3)
providing educational benefits to State
or county governments or private
entities; and (4) preventing people from
causing inadvertent harm to the species.
The primary regulatory effect of critical
habitat is the requirement under section
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
7(a)(2) of the Act that Federal agencies
refrain from taking any action that
destroys or adversely affects critical
habitat. The proposed critical habitat for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii is composed of
lands under Federal, State, county,
municipal, and private ownership.
Some of the lands designated as critical
habitat may be subject to Federal actions
that trigger the section 7 consultation
requirement, such as the granting of
Federal monies for conservation projects
or the need for Federal permits for
projects (for example, the filling of
wetlands subject to section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344, et
seq.)). There may also be some
educational or informational benefits to
the designation of critical habitat.
Educational benefits include the
notification of landowners, land
managers, and the general public of the
importance of protecting the habitat of
these species. In the case of L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii, these
aspects of critical habitat designation
would potentially benefit the
conservation of these species.
Although these species are limited in
their ecological and geographical ranges,
we have no information indicating that
a critical habitat designation would not
be prudent due to the threat of
overcollection or vandalism. Therefore,
since we have determined that the
designation of critical habitat will not
likely increase the degree of threat to
these species and may provide some
measure of benefit, we find that
designation of critical habitat is prudent
for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii: thus, we are
proposing to designate critical habitat in
accordance with section 4(b)(2) of the
Act.
Critical Habitat
Critical habitat is defined in section 3
of the Act as:
1. The specific areas within the
geographical area occupied by a species,
at the time it is listed in accordance
with the Act, on which are found those
physical or biological features
(a) Essential to the conservation of the
species, and
(b) Which may require special
management considerations or
protection; and
2. Specific areas outside the
geographical area occupied by a species
at the time it is listed, upon a
determination that such areas are
essential for the conservation of the
species.
Conservation, as defined under
section 3 of the Act, means to use and
the use of all methods and procedures
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
that are necessary to bring any
endangered species or threatened
species to the point at which the
measures provided pursuant to the Act
are no longer necessary.
Critical habitat receives protection
under section 7 of the Act through the
prohibition against destruction or
adverse modification of critical habitat
with regard to discretionary actions
carried out, funded, or authorized by a
Federal agency. Section 7 requires
consultation on discretionary Federal
actions that may affect critical habitat.
The designation of critical habitat does
not affect land ownership or establish a
refuge, wilderness, reserve, preserve, or
other conservation area. Such
designation does not allow government
or public access to private lands.
To be included in a critical habitat
designation, the habitat within the
geographic area occupied by the species
at the time it was listed must first have
the physical and biological features that
are essential to the conservation of the
species. Critical habitat designations
identify, to the extent known using the
best scientific data available, habitat
areas that provide essential life-cycle
needs of the species (i.e., areas on which
are found the primary constituent
elements, as defined at 50 CFR
424.12(b)). Occupied habitat that
contains features essential to the
conservation of the species meets the
definition of critical habitat only if those
features may require special
management considerations or
protection. Under the Act, we can
designate areas that were unoccupied at
the time of listing only when we
determine that the best available
scientific data demonstrate that the
designation of the area is essential to the
conservation of the species. When the
best available scientific data do not
demonstrate that the conservation needs
of the species require such additional
areas, we will not designate critical
habitat in areas outside the geographical
area occupied by the species at the time
of listing. An area currently occupied by
the species but not occupied at the time
of listing may, however, be determined
to be essential to the conservation of the
species and may be included in the
critical habitat designation.
Section 4 of the Act requires that we
designate critical habitat on the basis of
the best scientific and commercial data
available. Further, our ‘‘Policy on
Information Standards Under the
Endangered Species Act,’’ published in
the Federal Register on July 1, 1994 (59
FR 34271), and Section 515 of the
Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001
(P.L. 106-554; H.R. 5658) and the
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
associated Information Quality
Guidelines issued by the Service,
provide criteria, establish procedures,
and provide guidance to ensure that
decisions made by the Service make use
of the best scientific and commercial
data available.
When we are determining which areas
should be proposed as critical habitat, a
primary source of information is
generally the information developed
during the listing process for the
species. Additional information sources
may include the recovery plan for the
species, articles in peer-reviewed
journals, conservation plans developed
by States and counties, scientific status
surveys and studies, biological
assessments, or other unpublished
materials and expert opinion or
personal knowledge.
We recognize that designation of
critical habitat may not include all of
the habitat areas that may eventually be
determined to be necessary for the
recovery of the species, based on the
scientific data currently before the
Service, as new information may
become available that indicates
otherwise. In addition, habitat is often
dynamic, and species may shift from
one area to another over time. For these
reasons, a critical habitat designation
should not be interpreted as meaning
that habitat outside the designation is
unimportant or may not be required for
the recovery of the species in question.
Areas that support populations, but
are outside the critical habitat
designation, will continue to be subject
to conservation actions implemented
under section 7(a)(1) of the Act and to
the regulatory protections afforded by
the section 7(a)(2) jeopardy prohibition,
as determined on the basis of the best
available information at the time of the
action. Federally funded or permitted
projects affecting listed species outside
their designated critical habitat areas
may still result in jeopardy findings
under certain circumstances.
Methods
As required by section 4(b)(2)of the
Act, we used the best scientific data
available in determining areas occupied
at the time of listing that contain the
features essential to the conservation of
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii, considered
individually. We also determined
whether those features may require
special management considerations or
protection. We reviewed available
information that pertains to the habitat
requirements of these species; these
sources of information included, but
were not limited to, the proposed (65 FR
30941; May 15, 2000) and final (67 FR
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
68004; November 7, 2002) rules to list
these species; the draft recovery plan
(USFWS 2006); data contained in
reports prepared for or by the U.S.
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
(1999 through 2008), the Oregon
Department of Agriculture’s (ODA)
Native Plant Conservation Program
(2007-2008), and The Nature
Conservancy (TNC) (1998 through
2008); discussions with species experts
including ODA, BLM, ONHIC, and TNC
staff; data and information presented in
academic research theses; data provided
by ONHIC; Oregon State University
herbarium records; and data submitted
during section 7 consultations.
Additionally, we utilized regional
Geographic Information System (GIS)
shape files for area calculations and
mapping, such as United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA)
National Agriculture Imagery Program
aerial imagery, USDA soil maps, and
United States Geological Survey (USGS)
contour maps (USDA 2006a, 2006b,
2008; USGS 2002, 2009). We are not
currently proposing as critical habitat
any areas outside the geographical area
presently occupied by either L. f. ssp.
grandiflora or Lomatium cookii, because
the draft recovery plan indicates that
recovery can be attained within the
present range of each species (USFWS
2006). Our regulations stipulate that
critical habitat shall be designated
outside the areas presently occupied by
a species only when a designation
limited to its present range would be
inadequate to ensure the conservation of
the species (50 CFR 424.12(e)).
Primary Constituent Elements
In accordance with section 3(5)(A)(i)
of the Act and regulations at 50 CFR
424.12(b), in determining which areas
occupied at the time of listing to
propose as critical habitat, we consider
the physical and biological features
essential to the conservation of the
species and whether those features may
require special management
considerations or protection. These
features may include, but are not
limited to, the following:
(1) Space for individual and
population growth, and for normal
behavior;
(2) Food, water, air, light, minerals, or
other nutritional or physiological
requirements;
(3) Cover or shelter;
(4) Sites for breeding, reproduction,
rearing (or development) of offspring,
germination, or seed dispersal; and
generally
(5) Habitats that are protected from
disturbance or are representative of the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37319
historical geographical and ecological
distributions of a species.
The appropriate quantity and spatial
arrangement of the principal biological
or physical features within the defined
area essential to the conservation of the
species comprise the ‘‘primary
constituent elements’’ (PCEs) of critical
habitat. As defined by our implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 424.12(b)), these
primary constituent elements may
include, but are not limited to, features
such as roost sites, nesting grounds,
spawning sites, feeding sites, seasonal
wetlands or drylands, water quality and
quantity, host species or plant
pollinators, geological formations,
vegetation types, tides, and specific soil
types.
The specific PCEs required for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii are derived from
the biological needs of the species as
described in the Background section of
this proposed rule and the information
presented below.
Space for Individual and Population
Growth, Germination, and Seed
Dispersal
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii both occur on
vernal pool–mounded prairie and other
ephemeral wetland habitats underlain
by relatively undisturbed subsoils
subject to periodic inundation (Borgias
2004, pp. 17–20; ONHDB 1994, pp. 9–
10). In the Agate Desert, both species
occur in low-gradient mounded habitat
that supports a mosaic of low-growing
native grasses and forbs and an absence
of dense canopy vegetation. The pools
typically fill during the winter rains and
retain a wetted perimeter until late
April. In years with higher than average
winter rainfall, more depressions fill,
and individual pools that are separate in
dry years may merge together (Borgias
2004, p. 32). The dominant native
grasses and forbs associated with vernal
pool–mounded prairie habitat occupied
by L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii include: Alopecurus geniculatus,
Deschampsia danthonioides, Eryngium
petiolatum, Lasthenia californica,
Myosurus minimus, Navarretia
leucocephala ssp. leucocephala, Phlox
gracilis, Plagiobothrys bracteatus,
Trifolium depauperatum, and Triteleia
hyacinthina. In the Agate Desert, vernal
pool–mounded prairie habitats
occupied by Lomatium cookii, range
from 372 to 411 m (1,220 to 1,350 ft) in
elevation. In the same habitat, L. f. ssp.
grandiflora occurrences range from 372
to 469 m (1,220 to 1,540 ft) in elevation
(USGS 2002).
In the Illinois River Valley, Lomatium
cookii occurs primarily in alluvial
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37320
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
meadows underlain by relatively
undisturbed ultramafic soils subject to
winter inundation from rainfall,
seasonal flooding, and overland
drainage (ONHDB 1994, pp. 9–10).
These seasonally wet meadows,
occurring within Quercus garryanaQuercus kelloggii-Pinus ponderosa
forest openings, are dominated by native
grasses and forbs including:
Achnatherum lemmonii, Camassia spp.,
Danthonia californica, Deschampsia
cespitosa, Festuca roemeri, Poa
secunda, Ranunculus occidentalis, and
Limnanthes gracilis var. gracilis
(ONHDB 1994, p. 9). Widely spaced,
large pine trees are characteristic of the
open meadow habitat with some mixed
pine and oak woodlands occurring
along seasonal creeks. In the Illinois
River Valley area, Lomatium cookii
ranges from 383 to 488 m (1,256 to 1,600
ft) in elevation (USGS 2009).
These specific habitats and
hydrological regimes provide the
conditions essential for the growth and
survival of Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii and
for the successful production,
germination, and dispersal of seeds.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Slope
In the Agate Desert, Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii occur almost exclusively on lowgradient and flat terrains, not typically
exceeding 3 percent slope (USDA
2006b). In the Agate Desert, L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii occur
predominately in Agate-Winlo complex
soils mapped at 0 to 3 percent slope.
Most Illinois River Valley Lomatium
cookii occurrences are found on a
variety of soils that range from 0 to 8
percent slope (ONHIC 2008; USDA
2008). However, a few of the Lomatium
cookii sites in the Illinois River Valley
are on terrains with soils mapped up to
30 percent slope (ONHIC 2008).
Water and Nutritional or Physiological
Requirements
Vernal pools typically become
inundated or saturated during winter
rains and hold water for sufficient
lengths of time for Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii to
germinate, grow, and reproduce.
Periodically, this geographic area may
experience drought, and rainfall may be
insufficient to fill pools. The
composition of the plant community
can vary from year to year depending on
the timing and amount of annual
rainfall and the type of land
management on the site (Borgias 2004,
p. 16). The vernal pools and wet
meadow soils where the two plants
occur are dry during the summer but
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
become saturated with water nearly
every year. The water regime is
important for the sustenance of the two
plants and for their ability to germinate,
persist, and grow in wet conditions
during the winter months.
Vernal pool habitats, ephemeral
swales, seasonally wet meadows, and
streamside habitats occupied by
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii in the Rogue River
and Illinois River valleys can be
characterized as seasonal wetlands. The
habitats are dominated by mostly
obligate or facultative wetland
vegetation. The Lomatium cookii
occurrences at Rough and Ready Creek,
the Rogue Valley International–Medford
Airport, and a potentially introduced
population at Woodcock Creek are
clearly not wetlands but appear to have
high clay content in the soil (Kagan
1994, p. 10; Silvernail and Meinke 2008,
p. 31). The meadows at these sites may
have enough of a clay component so
that they would be seasonally wet
(ONHDB 1994, p. 10).
The moisture and other nutritional or
physiological requirements afforded by
these sites provide the essential
requirements for the growth,
germination, reproduction, and
successful seed dispersal of Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii.
Soil
For Lomatium cookii, which occurs in
both the Agate Desert and the Illinois
River Valley, the habitat soil types
between the two plant population
centers are vastly different in a variety
of chemical and physical characteristics.
In particular, the soil types in the Agate
Desert typically occupied by both
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii are Agate–Winlo
or Provig–Agate soils. Soils in the
Illinois River Valley occupied by
Lomatium cookii may be Abegg gravelly
loam, Brockman clay loam, Copsey clay,
Cornutt–Dubakel complex, Dumps,
Eightlar extremely stony clay, Evans
loam, Foehlin gravelly loam, Josephine
gravelly loam, Kerby loam, Newberg
fine sandy loam, Pearsoll–Rock outcrop
complex, Pollard loam, Riverwash,
Speaker–Josephine gravelly loam,
Takilma cobbly loam, or Takilma
Variant extremely cobbly loam. The
majority of Lomatium cookii
occurrences in the Illinois River Valley
are found on Brockman clay loam,
Josephine gravelly loam and Pollard
loam (USDA 2008). In a soil analysis
conduced by Silvernail and Meinke
(2008, p. 30), samples from ultramafic
Lomatium cookii habitat in the Illinois
River Valley had higher concentrations
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
of magnesium, nickel, chromium,
cobalt, zinc, and copper and higher
percent magnesium saturation. Soils
from Lomatium cookii habitat in the
Rogue River Valley had higher
concentrations of calcium, nitrogen,
phosphorus, potassium, manganese,
iron, and boron. Soils from the two
population centers had similar pH,
cation exchange capacity, and percent
sand, silt, or clay content (Silvernail and
Meinke 2008, p. 30).
Habitats Protected from Disturbance
Development
Disturbance in the form of
development is a major factor in the loss
or degradation of habitat for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii. Residential or commercial
development can directly eliminate or
fragment essential habitat for both of the
two species, causing declines in
distribution and numbers. Agricultural
development, such as ripping (a form of
deep tilling that potentially undermines
the hardpan layer of the soil), water
diversion, and water impoundment can
also eliminate habitat for the two plant
species. Development can indirectly
cause increases in nonnative plants in
the habitat, in turn decreasing
pollinators, habitat for pollinator
species, and seed production of many
native vernal pool plants (Thorp and
Leong 1998, pp. 169–179). L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii face
immediate threats from urban and
commercial development in the rapidly
expanding Medford and White City
metropolitan areas in the Rogue River
Valley. Protected habitat is therefore of
crucial importance for the growth and
dispersal of these two species.
Based on aerial imagery, habitat areas
that appear to provide sufficient buffer
protection and continuous nonfragmented Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora habitat were typically
greater than 8 ha (20 ac). Habitat areas
of this size provide protection from
adjacent development and weed sources
and contained intact hydrology (USDA
2006a). This is the size of the smallest
vernal pool–mounded prairie area that
is known to support L. f. ssp. grandiflora
(ONHIC 2008). Based on aerial imagery
and ONHIC information, habitat areas
that appeared to provide a sufficient
buffer protection and continuous nonfragmented Lomatium cookii habitat
covered at least 12 ha (30 ac). Habitat
areas of this minimum size provide
protection from adjacent development
and weed sources and contained intact
hydrology. The 12-ha (30-ac) habitat
area is equivalent to the smallest wet
meadow area in the Illinois River Valley
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
that supports Lomatium cookii (USDA
2006a, ONHIC 2008).
Invasive Nonnative Plants
Invasive nonnative species may
outcompete Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii for
open, bare ground and reduce space
available for the listed plants’ growth
(Borgias 2004, p. 45); therefore, the
listed plants require microhabitats free
of exotic or native invasive competitors.
In the Agate Desert, invasive nonnative
plants that compete with the two listed
species include: Centaurea solstitialis,
Cardaria draba, Hordeum marinum ssp.
gussoneanum, and Taeniantherum
caput-medusae (medusahead).
In the Illinois Valley, common
introduced grasses in the grazed
pastures in and around Lomatium cookii
habitat include: Festuca arundinacea
(tall fescue), Dactylis glomerata (orchard
grass), and Poa pratensis (Kentucky
bluegrass). In addition, the recently
introduced nonnative invasive species
Alyssum murale and A. corsicum
threaten Lomatium cookii in this area.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Primary Constituent Elements for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii
Under our regulations, we are
required to identify the known physical
and biological features or PCEs essential
to the conservation of Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii, which may require special
management considerations or
protection. All areas proposed as critical
habitat for L. f. ssp. grandiflora and
Lomatium cookii were occupied at the
time of listing, are within the species’
historical geographic range, and provide
sufficient PCEs to support at least one
life-history function.
Based on our current knowledge of
the life history, biology, and ecology of
the species and the characteristics of the
habitat necessary to sustain the essential
life history functions of the species, we
have determined that the PCEs for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
critical habitat are:
(1) Vernal pools or ephemeral
wetlands and the adjacent upland
margins of these depressions that hold
water for a sufficient length of time to
sustain Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora germination, growth, and
reproduction, occurring in the Agate
Desert vernal pool landscape (ONHP
1997, p. 3). These vernal pools or
ephemeral wetlands are seasonally
inundated during wet years but do not
necessarily fill with water every year
due to natural variability in rainfall, and
support native plant populations. Areas
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
of sufficient size and quality are likely
to have the following characteristics:
• Elevations from 372 to 469 m (1,220
to 1,540 ft);
• Associated dominant native plants
including, not limited to: Alopecurus
geniculatus, Deschampsia
danthonioides, Eryngium petiolatum,
Lasthenia californica, Myosurus
minimus, Navarretia leucocephala ssp.
leucocephala, Phlox gracilis,
Plagiobothrys bracteatus, Trifolium
depauperatum, and Triteleia
hyacinthina.
• A minimum area of 8 ha (20 ac) to
provide intact hydrology and protection
from development and weed sources.
(2) The hydrologically and
ecologically functional system of
interconnected pools, ephemeral
wetlands, or depressions within a
matrix of surrounding uplands that
together form vernal pool complexes
within the greater watershed. The
associated features may include the pool
basin or depressions; an intact hardpan
subsoil underlying the surface soils up
to 0.75 m (2.5 ft) in depth; and
surrounding uplands, including mound
topography and other geographic and
edaphic features, that support these
systems of hydrologically
interconnected pools and other
ephemeral wetlands (which may vary in
extent depending on site-specific
characteristics of pool size and depth,
soil type, and hardpan depth).
(3) Silt, loam, and clay soils that are
of alluvial origin, with a 0 to 3 percent
slope, primarily classified as Agate–
Winlo complex soils, but also including
Coker clay, Carney clay, Provig–Agate
complex soils, and Winlo very gravelly
loam soils.
(4) No or negligible presence of
competitive nonnative invasive plant
species. Negligible is defined for the
purpose of this rulemaking as a minimal
level of nonnative plant species that
will still allow Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora to continue to survive and
recover.
The need for space for individual and
population growth, germination, seed
dispersal, and reproduction is provided
by PCEs 1 and 4; the need for soil
moisture for growth, germination,
reproduction, and seed dispersal is
provided by PCE 2 (but not necessarily
every year); the need for other
nutritional or physiological
requirements for the species is met by
PCE 3; habitat free from disturbance that
allows for sufficient reproduction and
survival opportunities is provided by
PCEs 1 and 4. All of the above described
PCEs do not have to occur
simultaneously within a unit for the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37321
unit to constitute critical habitat for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora.
Based on our current knowledge of
the life history, biology, and ecology of
Lomatium cookii and the characteristics
of the habitat necessary to sustain the
essential life history functions of the
species, we have determined that the
PCEs for the species’ critical habitat are:
(1) (A) In the Agate Desert, vernal
pools and ephemeral wetlands and the
adjacent upland margins of these
depressions that hold water for a
sufficient length of time to sustain
Lomatium cookii germination, growth,
and reproduction. These vernal pools or
ephemeral wetlands support native
plant populations and are seasonally
inundated during wet years but do not
necessarily fill with water every year
due to natural variability in rainfall.
Areas of sufficient size and quality are
likely to have the following
characteristics:
• Elevations from 372 to 411 m (1,220
to 1,350 ft);
• Associated dominant native plants
including, not limited to: Alopecurus
geniculatus, Deschampsia
danthonioides, Eryngium petiolatum,
Lasthenia californica, Myosurus
minimus, Navarretia leucocephala ssp.
leucocephala, Phlox gracilis,
Plagiobothrys bracteatus, Trifolium
depauperatum, and Triteleia
hyacinthina; and
• A minimum area of 8 ha (20 ac) to
provide intact hydrology and protection
from development and weed sources.
(1) (B) In the Illinois River Valley, wet
meadows in oak and pine forests that
are seasonally inundated and support
native plant populations. Areas of
sufficient size and quality are likely to
have the following characteristics:
• Elevations from 383 to 488 m (1,256
to 1,600 ft);
• Associated dominant native plants
including, not limited to Achnatherum
lemmonii, Camassia spp., Danthonia
californica, Deschampsia cespitosa,
Festuca roemeri, Poa secunda,
Ranunculus occidentalis, and
Limnanthes gracilis var. gracilis;
• Occur primarily in bottomland
Quercus garryana–Quercus kelloggii–
Pinus ponderosa (Oregon white oak–
California black oak–ponderosa pine)
forest openings along seasonal creeks;
and
• A minimum area of 12 ha (30 ac) to
provide intact hydrology and protection
from development and weed sources.
(2) (A) In the Agate Desert, the
hydrologically and ecologically
functional system of interconnected
pools or ephemeral wetlands or
depressions within a matrix of
surrounding uplands that together form
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37322
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
vernal pool complexes within the
greater watershed. The associated
features may include the pool basin and
ephemeral wetlands; an intact hardpan
subsoil underlying the surface soils up
to 0.75 m (2.5 ft) in depth; and
surrounding uplands, including mound
topography and other geographic and
edaphic features that support systems of
hydrologically interconnected pools and
other ephemeral wetlands (which may
vary in extent depending on sitespecific characteristics of pool size and
depth, soil type, and hardpan depth).
(2) (B) In the Illinois Valley, the
hydrologically and ecologically
functional system of streams, slopes and
wooded systems that surround and
maintain seasonally wet alluvial
meadows underlain by relatively
undisturbed ultramafic soils within the
greater watershed.
(3) (A) In the Agate Desert, silt, loam,
and clay soils that are of ultramafic and
nonultramafic alluvial origin, with a 0
to 3 percent slope, classified as Agate–
Winlo or Provig–Agate soils.
(3) (B) In the Illinois Valley, silt, loam,
and clay soils that are of ultramafic and
nonultramafic alluvial origin, with a 0
to 30 percent slope, classified as Abegg
gravelly loam, Brockman clay loam,
Copsey clay, Cornutt–Dubakel complex,
Dumps, Eightlar extremely stony clay,
Evans loam, Foehlin gravelly loam,
Josephine gravelly loam, Kerby loam,
Newberg fine sandy loam, Pearsoll–
Rock outcrop complex, Pollard loam,
Riverwash, Speaker–Josephine gravelly
loam, Takilma cobbly loam, or Takilma
Variant extremely cobbly loam.
(4) No or negligible presence of
competitive nonnative invasive plant
species. Negligible is defined for the
purpose of this rulemaking as a minimal
level of nonnative plant species that
will still allow Lomatium cookii to
continue to survive and recover.
The need for space for individual and
population growth, germination, seed
dispersal, and reproduction is provided
by PCEs 1 and 4; the need for soil
moisture for growth, germination,
reproduction, and seed dispersal is
provided by PCE 2 (but not necessarily
every year); the need for other
nutritional or physiological
requirements for the species is met by
PCE 3; habitat free from disturbance that
allows for sufficient reproduction and
survival opportunities is provided by
PCEs 1 and 4. All of the above described
PCEs do not have to occur
simultaneously within a unit for the
unit to constitute critical habitat for
Lomatium cookii.
This proposed designation includes
the PCEs in the appropriate quantity
and spatial arrangement necessary to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
support the life history functions of
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii and are essential
to the conservation of these species.
Each of the areas proposed in this rule
has been determined to contain
sufficient PCEs to provide for one or
more of the life history functions of L.
f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii.
All of the above described PCEs do not
have to occur simultaneously within a
unit for the unit to constitute critical
habitat.
Criteria Used To Identify Critical
Habitat Boundaries
As required by section 4(b)(1)(A) of
the Act, we used the best scientific data
available in determining areas that
contain the features that are essential to
the conservation of Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii.
The steps we used in identifying critical
habitat are as follows:
(1) Our initial step was to determine,
in accordance with section 3(5)(A)(i) of
the Act and regulations in 50 CFR
424.12, the physical and biological
habitat features (the, PCEs) essential to
the conservation of the species as
explained in the previous section.
(2) We identified areas occupied by
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii at the time of
listing. Occupancy status was
determined using occurrence data from
the ONHIC database (ONHIC 2008),
Medford BLM records (BLM 2005), a
recent L. f. ssp. grandiflora status report
(Meyers 2008, pp. 1–65), Service staff
reports, data in reports submitted during
section 7 consultations and by biologists
holding section 10(a)(1)(A) recovery
permits, research published in peerreviewed articles, research presented in
academic theses and agency reports,
regional GIS coverages, and the OSU
herbarium record database (OSU 2007).
We determined occupancy at the time of
listing by comparing survey and
collection information and descriptions
of occupied areas in the final listing rule
published in the Federal Register on
November 7, 2002 (67 FR 68004). At the
time of the 2002 listing, 15 occurrences
(sites) were known for L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and 36 occurrences (sites)
were known for Lomatium cookii (67 FR
68004).
Since the final listing rule was
published, we have become aware of
additional areas that we have
determined were occupied at the time of
listing. Two such areas were known at
the time of listing, but at that time the
species were thought to have been
extirpated from those sites. First
identified in 1937, the two areas had no
exact location information (OSU 2007).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Attempts were made to relocate the
occurrences, but these attempts were
unsuccessful. However, in 2005, the two
areas were again found and each was
occupied by a large number of
Lomatium cookii plants. In addition,
one other site occupied by Lomatium
cookii was first identified in 2005, 3
years after the listing. Although we were
not aware of this occupied area at the
time of listing, it contained a large
number of individual Lomatium cookii
plants, relative to other occupied
locations.
We conclude that for all such areas
observed within 3 years of listing, it is
highly unlikely that such large
populations would have only just
become established subsequent to the
listing of the species. Based on longterm monitoring data, populations of
such large size are generally reflective of
robust populations that have persisted
over the long term. Therefore, if a site
was recorded within 3 years after the
listing of the species (between 2002 and
2005), and the population at that site
was so large that it must have been wellestablished and occupied for many
years, we considered that area to have
been occupied at the time of listing,
because the evidence supports the site
having been occupied but simply not
yet recorded at the time of listing, or we
had not been successful in relocating
those sites that had been documented
earlier.
Although various new occurrences
have been identified since the time of
listing in 2002, only three occurrences
of Lomatium cookii correspond to new
areas identified between the time of
listing in 2002 and the year 2005 that
we consider to have been occupied at
the time of listing. Currently, we know
of 22 documented occurrences of
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and 37 documented occurrences of
Lomatium cookii that correspond to a
total of 25 areas we consider to have
been occupied at the time of listing.
Note that multiple occurrences may
comprise a single occupied area; hence,
there will be a greater number of
occurrences than of occupied areas.
(3) We then considered areas
identified as priority 1 and 2 recovery
core areas in the draft recovery plan for
the two species (USFWS 2006) to
determine which areas contain the PCEs
in the amount and spatial configuration
essential to the conservation of the
species. Most areas identified as priority
1 and 2 recovery areas in the draft
recovery plan were incorporated into
the proposed designation. The one
exception is a site at the Medford
Airport that was identified as a recovery
area for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
grandiflora in the draft recovery plan,
but that site did not meet the size and
quality criteria for critical habitat, as
described below, and thus was not
included in the proposed designation.
(4) We removed any nonfunctional
vernal pool–mounded prairie or
meadow habitat that was developed or
degraded (not likely to contain PCEs) to
ensure proposed critical habitat
contains features essential to the
conservation of each of the species
(USDA 2006; ESA 2007, pp. 3-2 to 3-11).
We also did not consider any areas of
vernal pool–mounded prairie or
meadows containing 10 or fewer
reported individuals, as populations of
this size could by chance, become
extirpated due to:
(i) random natural events,
(ii) year-to-year variability in climate
patterns, and
(iii) accidental human-influenced
causes.
Furthermore, populations with 10
individuals or fewer could harbor
detrimental genes caused by inbreeding
depression. We considered populations
of such small size as not likely to occur
in habitats that provide the physical or
biological features necessary to support
populations capable of persisting for the
long term, thus such areas would not be
essential to the conservation of the two
species.
(5) As a final step, we considered
whether each of the areas identified may
need special management
considerations or protections. Our
consideration of this factor is presented
below.
Based on this analysis, we are
proposing to designate 25 units as
critical habitat for the two species: 8 for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and 17 for Lomatium cookii. Two of the
25 units are shared by both species.
After applying the above criteria, we
mapped the critical habitat unit
boundaries at each of these 25 areas. We
created maps using aerial imagery, 7.5
minute topographic maps, and GIS
contour data. We used publicly
available satellite imagery, for example,
from the National Agriculture Imagery
Program (USDA 2006) to assist in
identifying areas that would provide the
essential physical and biological
features for the species, using digital
habitat signatures.
In addition, based on aerial imagery,
we made every effort to avoid including
such developed areas as buildings,
paved areas, and other structures that
lack the PCEs for Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii
within the mapped boundaries of the
proposed critical habitat. We combined
the polygon data with information from
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
aerial photos to determine the proposed
critical habitat unit boundaries of each
site. The scale of the maps prepared
under the parameters for publication
within the Code of Federal Regulations
may not reflect the exclusion of such
developed areas. Any such structures
and the land under them inadvertently
left inside critical habitat boundaries
shown on the maps of this proposed
rule have been excluded by text in the
proposed rule and are not proposed for
designation as critical habitat.
Therefore, Federal actions limited to
these areas would not trigger section 7
consultation, unless they affect the
species, or primary constituent
elements, or both, in adjacent critical
habitat.
Special Management Considerations or
Protections
The term critical habitat is defined in
section 3(5)(A) of the Act, in part, as
geographic areas on which are found
those physical or biological features
essential to the conservation of the
species and ‘‘which may require special
management considerations or
protection.’’ Accordingly, in identifying
critical habitat in occupied areas, we
assess whether the PCEs within the
areas determined to be occupied at the
time of listing may require any special
management considerations or
protection. All areas being proposed as
critical habitat require some level of
management to address current and
future threats to Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii, to
maintain or enhance the physical and
biological features essential to their
conservation, and to ensure the recovery
and survival of these species.
The major threats to the PCEs in the
areas identified as proposed critical
habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii
include: development on private lands;
incompatible agricultural and grazing
practices; ground disturbance that
affects surface hydrology, including
ORV use and road construction or
maintenance activities; mining
activities; garbage dumping; the
succession of meadow habitat to
forested habitat due to fire suppression;
and encroachment and displacement by
nonnative plants. Herbivory by voles
and gophers may also affect these
species. In all of the proposed units in
Jackson County, special management is
needed to reduce or eradicate the threats
posed by development, habitat
fragmentation, ground disturbance that
affects surface hydrology, and
incompatible grazing practices. In all of
the proposed units in Josephine County,
special management is needed to reduce
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37323
or eradicate the threats posed by
development, ORV, mining activities,
garbage dumping, and woody vegetative
succession. Please refer to the unit
descriptions in the Proposed Critical
Habitat Designation section for further
discussion of special management
considerations or protection of the PCEs
related to geographically specific threats
to L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii.
In addition, for all units, special
management is needed to control and
monitor the encroachment of nonnative,
invasive plant species to maintain intact
vernal pool–mounded prairies and wet
meadow ecosystems such that they can
continue to support populations of
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii.
Special management considerations
or protection of the vernal pool–
mounded prairies and wet meadow
habitats that may be needed to support
reproduction and growth of Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii include: controlled burning and
vegetation clearing to maintain early
seral stages; nonnative invasive plant
species control; grazing management;
the re-establishment of hydrology; reseeding with native plants; monitoring;
and protection from development
(Borgias 2004, pp. 47–53; ONHDB 1994,
pp. 13–20).
Proposed Critical Habitat Designation
The areas we are proposing as critical
habitat currently provide the habitat
components necessary to meet the
primary biological needs of Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii, as defined by the PCEs. The
areas proposed for designation are those
areas that we have determined are most
likely to substantially contribute to
conservation of L. f. ssp. grandiflora and
Lomatium cookii and to contribute to
the long-term survival and recovery of
the species.
We have determined that 25 units
totaling approximately 4,467 ha (11,038
ac) meet our definition of critical habitat
for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii, including land
under Federal, State, county, municipal,
and private ownership. We are
proposing 8 units of critical habitat for
L. f. ssp. grandiflora and 17 units for
Lomatium cookii; two of these units,
White City and Whetstone Creek in
Jackson County, contain habitat for both
species (see Tables 1, 2, 3, and unit
descriptions below). The critical habitat
areas described below constitute our
best current assessment of areas that
meet the definition of critical habitat for
L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii. We have determined that all
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37324
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
areas proposed as critical habitat for L.
f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii
were occupied at the time of listing and
most are, we believe, currently occupied
as well (recent survey information was
not available for all sites).
The areas proposed as critical habitat
for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
are: (1) Unit RV1—Shady Cove; (2) Unit
RV2—Hammel Road; (3) Unit RV3A, B,
C, and D—North Eagle Point; (4) Unit
RV4—Rogue Plains; (5) Unit RV5—
Table Rock Terrace; (6) Unit RV6A, B,
C, D, E, F, G, and H—White City; (7)
Unit RV7— Agate Lake; and (8) Unit
RV8—Whetstone Creek. Units coded
with ‘‘RV’’ are in the Rogue Valley
(Agate Desert), Jackson County.
The areas proposed as critical habitat
for Lomatium cookii are: (1) Unit RV6A,
F, G, and H—White City; (2) Unit RV8—
Whetstone Creek; (3) Unit RV9A and
B—Medford Airport; (4) Unit IV1—
Anderson Creek; (5) Unit IV2—Draper
Creek; (6) Unit IV3—Reeves Creek
North; (7) Unit IV4—Reeves Creek East;
(8); Unit IV5—Reeves Creek South; (9);
Unit IV6A and B—Laurel Road; (10)
Unit IV7—Illinois River Forks State
Park; (11) Unit IV8—Woodcock
Mountain; (12) Unit IV9—Riverwash;
(13) Unit IV10—French Flat North; (14)
Unit IV11—Rough and Ready Creek;
(15) Unit IV12—French Flat Middle;
(16) Unit IV13—Indian Hill; and (17)
Unit IV14—Waldo. Units coded with
‘‘IV’’ are in the Illinois River Valley,
Josephine County.
The approximate area and land
ownership of each proposed critical
habitat unit is shown in Tables 1, 2, and
3. Portions of units or entire units
roughly correspond to the recovery core
areas for each species as identified in
the 2006 draft recovery plan (USFWS
2006). The recovery core areas were
selected based on occurrence records
and habitat identified through ground
surveys, aerial imagery, topography
features, and soil layers. As described
above, we assessed all areas proposed as
critical habitat to ensure that they
provide the requisite PCEs for the
species as defined in this proposed rule.
We conducted a regional review
across the range of Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii to
evaluate and select vernal pool–
mounded prairie and seasonally wet
meadow habitats that provide the
physical and biological features
essential to the conservation of the
species and that may require special
management considerations or
protection. Important factors we
considered were the known presence of
L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii (populations greater than 10
individuals) and the presence of intact
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
vernal pools, vernal pool complexes,
open meadows, and meadow complexes
supporting the hydrological
characteristics necessary to provide the
PCEs essential to the conservation of the
two species. We identified vernal pool–
mounded prairie and wet meadow
complexes throughout the range of these
species, which support high numbers of
L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii occurrences from the ONHIC
database (2008) and reports (Meyers
2008, pp. 1–65; Kaye and Thorpe 2008,
pp.16–25; ONHIC 2008; Service
database 2008). However, as is the case
with all critical habitat designations,
areas outside of this designation may
still prove to be necessary to the
recovery of this species. A description
of each area is outlined below.
Area 1: Jackson County, Oregon
In Jackson County, we are proposing
eight critical habitat units for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and three critical habitat units for
Lomatium cookii. The Jackson County
units occur approximately 58 km (30
mi) east of the nearest unit proposed for
Lomatium cookii species in Josephine
County. All proposed critical habitat
units in Jackson County are located
within the Middle Rogue River Basin or
‘‘Agate Desert.’’ Two units, White City
and Whetstone Creek, are occupied by
both species.
Unit RV1: Shady Cove
We are proposing to designate Unit
RV1 as critical habitat for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora. Unit RV1
consists of approximately 8 ha (20 ac) of
intact vernal pool–mounded prairie and
was occupied by the species at the time
of listing (ONHIC 2008). We have no
current information regarding the status
of this population but consider the plant
to be extant within the unit, as we have
no information indicating any activities
have occurred that likely would have
resulted in extirpation. Unit RV1
contains all of the PCEs for L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and was identified in the
draft recovery plan as the Shady Cove
recovery core area (USFWS 2006, pp.
IV-12–IV-13). This unit was not
designated as vernal pool fairy shrimp
critical habitat. It parallels a 430 m (ft)
stretch of Highway 62 and is located 460
m (1,500 ft) west of Highway 62. The
unit is 0.8 km (0.5 mi) south of Shady
Cove, 1.3 km (0.8 mi) northeast of
Takelma Park, and is 122 m (400 ft) east
of the Rogue River. The unit is occurs
on privately owned land. Aerial imagery
indicates that the unit is composed of
intact vernal pool–mounded prairie
habitat (USDA 2006).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
ONHIC database records make no
mention of any ongoing threats to the
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
population within the unit; however,
the occurrence information mentions
that the adjacent habitat to the south
had been leveled, indicating that
agricultural development is occurring in
the area (ONHIC 2008). The unit occurs
in an area of predominant agricultural
and grazing use (Borgias 2004, p. 8).
Practices that could occur on the
property that might negatively affect L.
f. ssp. grandiflora habitat, if not
properly managed, include water
impoundment, tilling, and grazing. We
are not aware of any conservation
agreements or management plans to
conserve L. f. ssp. grandiflora habitat
within this unit. Special management
considerations or protection may be
required to restore, protect, and
maintain the PCEs supported by Unit
RV1 due to threats from agricultural
development, potential incompatible
grazing practices, and the encroachment
of invasive, nonnative, annual plant
species.
Unit RV2: Hammel Road
We are proposing to designate Unit
RV2 as critical habitat for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora. Unit RV2
consists of approximately 84 ha (207 ac)
of intact vernal pool–mounded prairie.
The unit is currently occupied by L. f.
ssp. grandiflora and was occupied at the
time of listing (ONHIC 2008). This
critical habitat unit contains all of the
PCEs for L. f. ssp. grandiflora and was
identified as the Staley Road recovery
core area in the draft recovery plan
(USFWS 2006, pp. IV-12–IV-13). This
unit is also designated as vernal pool
fairy shrimp critical habitat and
corresponds to vernal pool fairy shrimp
critical habitat subunit 1A (North Agate
Desert Unit) (71 FR 7117). It is located
on privately owned land, 1.2 km (0.75
mi) northeast of the confluence of Reese
Creek and the Rogue River, 1.3 km (0.8
mi) west of Highway 62, and 430 m
(1,400 ft) east of the Rogue River.
A recent observation indicates that
approximately 1,500 L. f. ssp.
grandiflora are present on the unit
(Meyers 2008, p. 6). Aerial imagery and
field observations indicate that the unit
is comprised of intact vernal pool–
mounded prairie habitat (USDA 2006a;
Meyers 2008, p. 6).
ONHIC database (2008) records
indicate that light grazing occurs within
this unit, and the grazing practices
appear to have been compatible with the
survival of Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora over the past 13 years. We
are not aware of any conservation
agreements or plans to protect L. f. ssp.
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
grandiflora habitat within this unit.
Practices that could occur on the
property that might negatively affect L.
f. ssp. grandiflora habitat if not properly
managed include water impoundment,
tilling, and grazing. Special
management considerations or
protection may be required to restore,
protect, and maintain the PCEs
supported by Unit RV2 due to threats
from agricultural development,
potential incompatible grazing
practices, and the encroachment of
invasive, nonnative, annual plant
species.
Unit RV3A, B, C, and D: North Eagle
Point
We are proposing to designate Unit
RV3 as critical habitat for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora. The unit
consists of four subunits totaling 539 ha
(1,331 ac) of intact vernal pool habitat
that is currently occupied by the species
and was occupied at the time of listing
(ONHIC 2008). This critical habitat unit
contains all of the PCEs for L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and was identified as the
North Eagle Point recovery core area in
the draft recovery plan (USFWS 2006,
pp. IV-12–IV-13). Unit RV3 is also
designated as vernal pool fairy shrimp
critical habitat and corresponds to
vernal pool fairy shrimp critical habitat
subunits 1B, D, and G (North Agate
Desert Unit) (71 FR 7117). The unit is
located on privately owned land
southwest of Mosser Mountain and
northeast of Long Mountain. The four
subunits loosely follow a 6.9 km (4.3
mi) stretch of Hog Creek beginning at its
origin. Originating 3.8 km (2.4 mi) east
of Highway 62 in subunit RV3D, Hog
Creek runs through RV3C, crosses
Highway 62, flows between RV3B
(located 100 m (328 ft) west of Highway
62) and RV3A (located 600 m (1,970 ft)
west of Highway 62), before emptying
into the Rogue River after 2.4 km (1.5
mi). Subunit RV3A is located 560 m
(1,837 ft) southeast of the confluence of
Reese Creek and the Rogue River.
Subunit RV3B is located 100 m (328 ft)
west of Highway 62 at the intersection
of Ball Road and extends along an 835
m (2,740 ft) stretch of Hog Creek.
Subunit RV3C is located 2 km (1.2 mi)
north of Eagle Point (see Index map) and
extends 2.6 km (1.6 mi) south of the
junction of Ball Road and Reese Creek
Road. Subunit RV3D is located 3.2 km
(2 mi) east of Long Mountain and is 2.4
km (1.5 mi) southeast of the junction of
Highway 62 and Ball Road. It extends
along a 1.8 km (1.1 mi) stretch of Hog
Creek.
ONHIC Element Occurrence data
accounts for two 1,000-plant
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
populations within this unit, one
growing in an area of intact vernal pool–
mounded prairie habitat and one in an
atypical swale habitat alongside a fence.
An additional 500 L. f. ssp. grandiflora
plants growing in intact vernal pool–
mounded prairie habitat on a separate
property within the unit was reported
by Wildlands, Inc. (Wildlands, Inc.
2008, p. 3). Aerial imagery indicates that
the unit contains a significant amount of
intact vernal pool–mounded prairie
habitat (USDA 2006a).
Some habitat in this unit has been
degraded by cattle grazing practices and
agricultural development (Wildlands,
Inc. 2008, p. 1). The entire unit occurs
in an area of predominant agricultural
and grazing use (Borgias 2004, p. 8).
Livestock have caused significant
damage to large vernal pools within the
unit by soil compaction and mound and
pool topography alteration (Oregon
Natural Heritage Program (ONHP) 1997,
p. 16). In addition, vernal pool
hydrology has been compromised in
some portions of the unit by water
impoundment, causing water to
permanently fill some vernal pools in
several areas (Southern Oregon Land
Conservancy 2008, p. 3). In addition,
nonnative invasive annual grasses have
colonized large portions of the unit and
threaten to encroach on Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora populations
(Southern Oregon Land Conservancy
2008, p. 4).
There are established protective
measures to conserve Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and the habitat
of the threatened vernal pool fairy
shrimp on two private properties within
this unit. Long-term management plans
are in development for both of the
properties to protect and restore vernal
pool–mounded prairie function; these
plans will cover approximately 20
percent of the land in the unit.
Monitoring and improved grazing
management are currently taking place
on the two properties to further
conserve L. f. ssp. grandiflora habitat
(M. Young, pers. comm. 2009; Southern
Oregon Land Conservancy 2008, p. 6).
Other special management
considerations or protection on other
properties within the unit may be
required to restore, protect, and
maintain the PCEs supported by Unit
RV3 due to threats from agricultural
development, potential incompatible
grazing practices, and the encroachment
of invasive, nonnative, annual grasses.
Unit RV4: Rogue Plains
We are proposing to designate Unit
RV4 as critical habitat for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora. This unit
consists of 245 ha (605 ac) of intact
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37325
vernal pool–mounded prairie habitat
that is currently occupied by the species
and was occupied at the time of listing
(ONHIC 2008; Meyers 2008, p. 10). This
critical habitat unit contains all of the
PCEs for L. f. ssp. grandiflora and was
identified as the Rogue Plains recovery
core area in the draft recovery plan
(USFWS 2006, pp. IV-12–IV-13). Unit
RV4 has been designated as critical
habitat for vernal pool fairy shrimp and
corresponds to vernal pool fairy shrimp
critical habitat subunits 1C, E, and F
(North Agate Desert Unit) (71 FR 7117).
The unit occurs on privately owned
land located 122 m (400 ft) southeast of
the junction of Highway 234 and Modoc
Road. It extends 2 km (1.2 mi) south
along Modoc Road from the
intersection, is located 1.4 km (0.87 mi)
southwest of Dodge Bridge, and 1.0 km
(0.6 mi) northwest of Rattlesnake Rapids
on the Rogue River.
A recent Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora survey report within Unit
RV4 describes a robust 5,000-plant
population occurring at the privately
owned ‘‘Rogue River Plains Preserve.’’
The report also describes a L. f. ssp.
grandiflora occurrence from which the
species appears to have been extirpated
(Meyers 2008, pp. 10, 55). For the most
part, aerial imagery and field
observations indicate that the unit is
composed of intact vernal pool–
mounded prairie habitat (USDA 2006a;
Meyers 2008, p. 6).
Some habitat within this unit appears
to have been degraded (Meyers 2008, p.
55), however, the winter and spring
grazing presently occurring at the Rogue
River Plains Preserve property appears
to be compatible with the survival of
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
(Borgias 2004, p. 42). A photograph
attached to a recent survey report
depicts weakly developed vernal-pool
mounded prairie topography at the
property. At the site of the extirpated L.
f. ssp. grandiflora location within the
unit, incompatible grazing practices
may have contributed to the local
extirpation of the species.
Threats facing vernal-pool mounded
prairie habitat in this unit are
agricultural development, incompatible
grazing practices, and the encroachment
of invasive, nonnative, annual grasses.
A conservation easement, held by TNC
and placed on the privately owned
Rogue River Plains Preserve property,
permits the landowners to continue
restricted grazing on their property,
while development and agricultural
development rights are withdrawn.
Other special management
considerations or protection on other
properties within the unit may be
needed to restore, protect, and maintain
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37326
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
the PCEs supported by Unit RV4 due to
threats from agricultural development,
potential incompatible grazing
practices, and the encroachment of
invasive, nonnative, annual grasses.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Unit RV5: Table Rock Terrace
We are proposing to designate Unit
RV5 as critical habitat for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora. The unit
includes 49 ha (122 ac) of intact vernal
pool–mounded prairie habitat that has
been occupied by the species since the
time of listing (ONHIC 2008, USDA
2006a). Although a survey conducted on
a portion of the unit in 2008 did not
confirm presence of L. f. ssp. grandiflora
plants (Meyers 2008, p. 59), a more
recent partial survey verified the
continued occupation of the unit by L.
f. ssp. grandiflora (S. Friedman 2009,
pers. obs.). This critical habitat unit
contains all of the PCEs for L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and was identified as the
Table Rock Terrace recovery core area in
the draft recovery plan (USFWS 2006,
pp. IV-12–IV-13). This unit is not
designated as vernal pool fairy shrimp
critical habitat. Unit RV5 is located on
privately owned land 670 m (2,200 ft)
north of the junction of Modoc and
Antioc Roads, is 1.4 km (0.9 mi) east of
Upper Table Rock, and 650 m (2,300 ft)
west of the Rogue River. This unit
follows along an 800 m (2,600 ft) stretch
of Modoc Road to the east of the unit
and a 700 m (2,300 ft) stretch of Antioc
Road west of the unit.
Threats facing vernal-pool mounded
prairie habitat in this unit may include
agricultural development, incompatible
grazing practices, and the encroachment
of invasive, nonnative, annual grasses.
Other special management
considerations or protection within the
unit may be needed to restore, protect,
and maintain the PCEs supported by
Unit RV5 due to these threats.
Unit RV6, Subunits A, B, C, D, E, F, G,
and H: White City
This unit consists of eight subunits
that generally encompass the perimeter
of White City. We are proposing to
designate all subunits in this unit as
critical habitat for Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora. In addition, we are
proposing to designate subunits RV6 A,
F, G, and H as critical habitat for
Lomatium cookii. This 848-ha (2,095-ac)
unit includes intact vernal pool–
mounded prairie and swale habitats that
were occupied by the two species at the
time of listing; both species presently
occur within some or all of the subunits.
This critical habitat unit contains all of
the PCEs for L. f. ssp. grandiflora and
Lomatium cookii and was identified as
the Agate Desert recovery core area in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
the draft recovery plan (USFWS 2006,
pp. IV-12–IV-13). Unit RV6 is also
designated as vernal pool fairy shrimp
critical habitat and corresponds to
vernal pool fairy shrimp critical habitat
subunits 2A, B, C, D, and E and 3A and
B (White City East and West Units) (71
FR 7117; February 10, 2006). The unit
occurs on State, county, municipal and
privately owned lands. It is located
around White City, is 1.6 km (1.0 mi)
southwest of Eagle Point, and is 440 m
(1,444 ft) southeast of the confluence of
the Rogue River and Little Butte Creek.
Subunit RV6A is located north of
Whetstone Creek and is 500 m (1,200 ft)
west of the junction of Highway 62 and
Antelope Road. Subunits RV6B, RV6C,
RV6D and RV6E are located north of
Avenue G in White City, south of Little
Butte Creek, and 670 m (2,200 ft)
southwest of Antelope Creek. Subunits
RV6F and RV6G are located
approximately 500 feet west of Dry
Creek and are east of Highway 62 in
White City. Subunit RV6H is located
north of Whetstone Creek and south of
Antelope Road. Subunit RV6H roughly
encircles the Hoover Ponds, east of
Highway 62, and is 850 m (2790 ft) east
of subunit RV6A. The land in this unit
is 29 percent State-owned, 6 percent
county-owned, 10 percent municipally
owned, and 55 percent privately owned.
This unit includes highly intact
vernal pool–mounded prairie habitat.
The Nature Conservancy manages a 22ha (54-ac) parcel within this unit to
conserve vernal pool–mounded prairie
habitat and has recently developed a
management plan to restore and
enhance vernal pool function across 86
ha (213 ac) of habitat owned by the
Oregon Department of Fish and
Wildlife’s (ODFW) Denman Wildlife
Area. A mitigation site owned by
Jackson County School District Number
9 protects 9.5 ha (24 ac) of intact vernal
pool–mounded prairie habitat with one
of the largest known populations of
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora.
The City of Medford also leases 88 ha
(217 ac) of vernal pool–mounded prairie
for cattle grazing on some less intact
vernal-pool mounded prairie habitat. In
addition, the Oregon Department of
Transportation (ODOT) manages two
locations as roadside special
management areas for the protection of
L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii.
Threats facing vernal pool–mounded
prairie habitat in this unit include urban
and commercial development,
agricultural development, incompatible
grazing practices, and the encroachment
of invasive, nonnative annual grasses.
The Nature Conservancy and Jackson
County School District Number 9 have
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
conducted prescribed burns, seeded
with native plants, and erected signs
and fences to control encroachment of
nonnative invasive plants, discourage
recreational ORV use, and restore native
plant communities (Borgias 2004, p. 22;
USFWS 2006, pp. I-18–I-21). ODFW has
plans to restore vernal pool–mounded
prairie habitat across the Denman
Management Area by removing
nonnative bunch grasses and restoring
hydrologic flow by eliminating old road
beds (Borgias et al. 2009, pp. 16-22).
Other special management
considerations or protection within the
unit may be needed to restore, protect,
and maintain the PCEs supported by
Unit RV6 due to the described threats
within the units.
Unit RV7: Agate Lake
We are proposing to designate Unit
RV7 as critical habitat for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora. This unit
consists of 426 ha (1,053 ac) of intact
vernal pool–mounded prairie and swale
habitat; the unit is currently occupied
by the species and was occupied at the
time of listing (Meyers 2008, p. 45). This
critical habitat unit contains all of the
PCEs for L. f. ssp. grandiflora and was
identified as the Agate Lake recovery
core area in the draft recovery plan
(USFWS 2006, pp. IV-12–IV-13). Unit
RV7 has been designated as critical
habitat for vernal pool fairy shrimp and
corresponds to vernal pool fairy shrimp
critical habitat subunit 2B (White City
East Unit) (71 FR 7117; February 10,
2006). The unit occurs on federally and
privately owned land located 500 m
(1,640 ft) east of the Agate Reservoir,
along a 5.4-km (3.4-mi) stretch roughly
parallel and between Dry Creek and
Antelope Creek, is 330 m (1,080 ft)
north of Tater Hill, and is 1.4 km (0.9
mi) southeast of the confluence of Dry
Creek and Antelope Creek. The land in
this unit is approximately 9 percent
federally owned and 89 percent
privately owned.
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
(BOR) has completed a management
plan for 38 ha (94 ac) of slightly
degraded vernal pool–mounded prairie
habitat within this unit. BOR has
established protective measures to
conserve vernal pool–mounded prairie
habitat. A long-term management plan
has been finalized to protect and restore
vernal pool–mounded prairie function
(BOR 2006, p. 1-1). Previous to 2008,
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
had not been reported in the unit since
1965. In 2008, a 300-plant population of
L. f. ssp. grandiflora was observed in
recently restored vernal pool–mounded
prairie habitat on Federal land within
the unit (p. Meyers 2008, p. 45).
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
The PCEs in this unit are threatened
by invasion of nonnative herbaceous
annuals, trash dumping, activities
associated with fire management (fireline construction), vandalism,
unauthorized ORV use, and
incompatible grazing practices (BOR
2006, p. 1-8; Borgias 2004, p. 12).
Therefore, special management
considerations or protection may be
required to restore, protect, and
maintain the PCEs supported by Unit
RV7 due to these threats.
Unit RV8: Whetstone Creek
We are proposing to designate Unit
RV8 as critical habitat for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii. Unit RV8 consists of 362 ha (896
ac) of intact vernal pool–mounded
prairie and swale habitat that was
occupied by both species at the time of
listing; both species continue to occur
within the unit (ONHIC 2008; Meyers
2008, p. 20). This critical habitat unit
contains all of the PCEs for L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii and
was identified as the Whetstone Creek
recovery core area in the draft recovery
plan (USFWS 2006, pp. IV-12–IV-13).
Unit RV8 has been designated as critical
habitat for vernal pool fairy shrimp and
corresponds to vernal pool fairy shrimp
critical habitat subunit 3C (White City
West Unit) (71 FR 7117; February 10,
2006). The unit occurs on State,
municipal, and privately owned land
located just west of White City. The unit
is located approximately 1.4 km (0.9 mi)
southeast of the confluence of the Rogue
River and Whetstone Creek, 2.2 km (1.4
mi) southwest of Tou Velle State Park,
and 2.9 km southeast of the confluence
of Bear Creek and the Rogue River. The
unit roughly parallels a 2.6 km (1.6 mi)
stretch of Whetstone Creek to the south.
The land in this unit is 9 percent Stateowned, 10 percent municipally owned,
and 81 percent privately owned.
This unit includes highly intact
vernal-pool mounded prairie habitat
with partial protection by city
regulation and private conservation
easements. This is the only unit that
includes a shrub and tree component
within vernal pool–mounded prairie
habitat. The Nature Conservancy
manages a 58-ha (144-ac) parcel within
this unit occupied by both Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii. One of the primary purposes of
the preserve is to conserve vernal pool–
mounded prairie habitat. The Nature
Conservancy has recently developed a
management plan to restore and
enhance vernal pool function across a
32-ha (80-ac), neighboring property
owned by ODOT that also occurs within
the unit. The City of Medford leases 36
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
ha (96 ac) of vernal pool–mounded
prairie habitat within the unit for
grazing.
The PCEs in this unit are threatened
by invasion of nonnative herbaceous
annuals, incompatible agricultural
development, aggregate mining,
unauthorized ORV use, and
incompatible grazing practices (BOR
2006, pp. 1-8; Borgias 2004, p. 12).
Therefore, special management
considerations or protection on other
properties within the unit may be
required to restore, protect, and
maintain the PCEs supported by Unit
RV8 due to the threats mentioned above.
Unit RV9A and B: Medford Airport
We are proposing to designate Unit
RV9 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of the subunits
RV9A and RV9B. Lomatium cookii has
been known from this unit since before
the time it was listed (ONHIC 2008).
Unit RV9 includes 76 ha (190 ac) of
slightly degraded vernal pool–mounded
prairie habitat. No areas within this unit
were designated as vernal pool fairy
shrimp critical habitat. A report on
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
within the unit indicates that the
population has fewer than 10
individuals (Meyers 2008, p 48);
therefore, we are not proposing to
designate this unit as critical habitat for
this species, as explained above in our
criteria to identify critical habitat
boundaries. This critical habitat unit
contains all of the PCEs for Lomatium
cookii and was identified as the Rogue
Airfield recovery core area in the draft
recovery plan (USFWS 2006, pp. IV-12–
IV-13). The two subunits are located
mostly within the Rogue Valley
International – Medford Airport,
approximately 2 km (1.2 mi) west of
Coker Butte and 1.5 km (0.9 mi)
northeast of Bear Creek. Subunit RV9A
is located 1.4 km (0.9 mi) north of the
Rogue Valley International – Medford
Airport and is 300 m (980 ft) east of the
junction of Vilas Road and Table Rock
Road. Subunit RV9B is between Upton
Slough and Bear Creek and 1.7 km
northeast of the junction of Interstate 5
and Highway 62. The land in this unit
is 93 percent county-owned and 7
percent privately owned.
This unit includes one of the most
extensive and densest populations of
Lomatium cookii within its range. The
Rogue Valley International – Medford
Airport is managed to meet FAA safety
requirements. The property is
completely fenced-in to exclude people
and large animals and is periodically
mowed to keep vegetation low and
reduce use by large birds and other
wildlife. The security fencing and
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37327
regular mowing is compatible with
Lomatium cookii growth, reproduction,
and germination and has enabled a
robust population to become
established. Other properties not
included in the airport security zone are
properties within the City of Medford
urban growth boundary likely to become
commercially developed.
Threats facing the vernal pool–
mounded prairie habitat in this unit are
potential airport and commercial
development. The development of a
new runway that could be placed across
the densest population of Lomatium
cookii has been suggested in the longterm plan for the airport (Rogue Valley
International–Medford Airport 2001, pp.
5-2–5-4; 6-4–6-6). Special management
considerations or protection within the
unit may be needed to conserve and
maintain the PCEs supported by Unit
RV9 due to this threat.
Area 2: Josephine County, Oregon
In Josephine County, we are
proposing 14 critical habitat units for
Lomatium cookii. The Josephine County
units occur approximately 58 km (30
mi) west of the nearest unit proposed for
this species in Jackson County. None of
the Josephine County units were
designated as critical habitat for the
vernal pool fairy shrimp in Oregon.
Unit IV1: Anderson Creek
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV1 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. Unit IV1 consists of 53 ha (132
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat that is
currently occupied and was occupied by
the species at the time of listing
(ONHDB 1994, pp. 9–10; OSU 2008).
Unit IV1 contains all the PCEs for
Lomatium cookii and was identified in
the draft recovery plan as the Anderson
Creek recovery core area (USFWS 2006,
pp. IV-11, IV-14). It is located on
privately owned land, 3.5 km (2.2 mi)
north of Selma, 14 km (8.8 mi) north of
Cave Junction, along a 1.0 km (0.6 mi)
stretch of Anderson Creek and Highway
199, 2.0 km (1.2 mi) southwest of Hays
Hill Summit, and is 1.7 km (1.0 mi)
northwest of the junction of Draper
Valley Road and Indian Creek Road.
The two occurrences in this unit are
the most northern known occurrences of
Lomatium cookii in the Illinois Valley.
Recent surveys located two populations
in this unit, one with 135 plants and
one with 1,000 plants. The two
populations were reported as growing in
open, grassy meadows (C. Shohet, pers.
comm. 2005). Aerial imagery suggests
the habitat in this unit is relatively
intact wet meadow (USDA 2006a).
Potential threats to the Lomatium
cookii habitat in this unit include
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37328
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
incompatible grazing practices,
agricultural development, alterations in
hydrology due to timber production,
native and noxious weed encroachment,
and woody vegetation succession as the
result of fire suppression (J. Kagan, pers.
comm. 2008; C. Shohet, pers. comm.
2005). Grazing is a common agricultural
practice in the area (J. Kagan, pers.
comm. 2008), but depending on
management within this unit, it may be
incompatible with growth,
reproduction, and germination of the
species. We are not aware of any
conservation agreements or management
plans to conserve critical habitat within
this unit. Special management
considerations or protection may be
required to restore, protect, and
maintain the PCEs supported by Unit
IV1 due to threats from agricultural
development, potential incompatible
grazing practices, and woody vegetative
succession due to decreased fire return
intervals.
Unit IV2: Draper Creek
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV2 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of 39 ha (97
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat, was
occupied by Lomatium cookii at the
time of listing (ONHDB 1994, p. 5; OSU
2008), and continues to be occupied by
the species. Unit IV2 contains all of the
PCEs for Lomatium cookii and was
identified in the draft recovery plan as
the Draper Creek recovery core area
(USFWS 2006, pp. IV-11, IV-14). It is
located on privately owned land 2.7 km
(1.7 mi) northeast of Selma, 13.5 km (8.4
mi) north of Cave Junction, along a 900
m (2,900 ft) stretch of Draper Creek,
located 800 m (2,600 ft) east of
Anderson Creek. The unit is 800 m
(2,600 ft) north-northwest of the
confluence of Draper Creek and Davis
Creek and is 200 m (650 ft) southeast of
the junction of Draper Valley Road and
Indian Creek Road.
According to a recent survey report,
this unit includes relatively intact wet
meadow habitat associated with Draper
Creek. A recent survey located a 400plant Lomatium cookii population here,
reported as growing in an open, grassy
meadow (C. Shohet, pers. comm. 2005).
The Lomatium cookii occurrence in this
unit is among the most northern known
occurrences for this species in the
Illinois Valley. Aerial imagery suggests
the habitat in this unit may be reverting
to oak and conifer succession in some
areas (USDA 2006a).
Potential threats to the Lomatium
cookii habitat in this unit include
incompatible grazing practices,
agricultural development, alterations in
hydrology due to timber production,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
native and noxious weed encroachment,
and woody vegetation succession (C.
Shohet, pers. comm. 2005). Grazing is a
common agricultural practice in the area
(J. Kagan, pers. comm. 2009), but
depending on management within the
unit, it may be incompatible with
growth, reproduction, and germination
of the species. No conservation
agreements or protections have been
established within this unit, and we are
not aware of any conservation plans to
conserve critical habitat within this
unit. Special management
considerations or protection may be
required to restore, protect, and
maintain the PCEs supported by Unit
IV2 due to threats from agricultural
development, incompatible grazing
practices, and woody vegetative
succession due to increased fire return
intervals.
Unit IV3: Reeves Creek North
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV3 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of 105 ha (260
ac) of wet meadow habitat. Lomatium
cookii occupied this unit at the time of
listing and continues to be found here
(ONHIC 2008). Unit IV3 contains all of
the PCEs for Lomatium cookii and was
identified in the draft recovery plan as
the Reeves Creek West recovery core
area (USFWS 2006, pp. IV-11, IV-14).
This unit is located on Federal and
privately owned land, 4.5 km (2.8 mi)
south of Selma, 6.0 km (3.75 mi) north
of Cave Junction, and 1.1 km (0.7 mi)
northeast of Sauers Flat. The unit is
located 1.4 km (0.9 mi) east of the
confluence between Reeves Creek and
the Illinois River and extends along a
2.0 km (1.2 mi) stretch of Reeves Creek,
beginning 800 m (2,600 ft) northeast of
the junction of Highway 199 and Reeves
Creek Road. The land in this unit is 58
percent federally owned and 42 percent
privately owned.
The wet meadow habitat in this unit
is primarily threatened by natural
vegetative succession, but there is
potential for road maintenance to
become a threat. Road maintenance
often fragments populations and can
directly affect plants. Woody vegetative
succession can impact Lomatium cookii
populations in this unit by overshading. Due to this threat, the plants
observed in this unit occur in smaller
numbers and grow in more limited areas
compared to other Illinois Valley
populations and appear to be more
fragmented (ONHIC 2008). Timber
harvesting occurs in this unit
periodically and could affect Lomatium
cookii populations in the next few years.
Special management considerations or
protection may be required to restore,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
protect, and maintain the PCEs
supported by Unit IV3 due to threats
from woody vegetation succession,
impacts associated with timber
harvesting activities, and road
maintenance.
Unit IV4: Reeves Creek East
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV4 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of 69 ha (170
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat and
has been occupied by Lomatium cookii
since the time of listing (ONHIC 2008).
Unit IV4 contains all of the PCEs for
Lomatium cookii and was identified in
the draft recovery plan as the Reeves
Creek East recovery core area (USFWS
2006, pp. IV-11, IV-14). This unit is
located on Federal and privately owned
land, 6.2 km (3.9 mi) south of Selma,
and 5.3 km (3.3 mi) northwest of Cave
Junction. It occurs along a 500 m (1,640
ft) stretch of Reeves Creek located 700
m (2,300 ft) southeast of Unit IV3. The
land in this unit is 52 percent federally
owned and 48 percent privately owned.
The wet meadow habitat in this unit
is primarily threatened by woody
vegetative succession, activities
associated with timber harvesting
practices, road maintenance, and ORV
use. The single Lomatium cookii
population known from this unit is
described as fragmented by a road cut.
Portions of the habitat in this unit are
also threatened by early seral forest
succession (ONHIC 2008). As with the
previous unit, plants observed in this
unit occur in smaller numbers and grow
in more limited areas compared to other
Illinois Valley populations, and the
populations appear to be more
fragmented. Special management
considerations or protection may be
required to restore, protect, and
maintain the PCEs supported by Unit
IV4 due to threats from road
construction, impacts associated with
timber harvesting, woody vegetative
succession, and ORV use.
Unit IV5: Reeves Creek South
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV5 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of 158 ha (391
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat. This
unit was occupied by Lomatium cookii
at the time of listing and the species
continues to be found there (ONHIC
2008). Unit IV5 contains all of the PCEs
for Lomatium cookii and was identified
in the draft recovery plan as the Reeves
Creek West recovery core area (USFWS
2006, pp. IV-11, IV-14). The unit is
located on both Federal and private land
roughly parallel to Highway 199 for 2.5
km (1.6 mi), which is 500 m (1,640 ft)
west of the unit. The unit is located 1.6
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
km (1.0 mi) north of Cave Junction, 1
km (0.6 mi) southeast of Sauers Flat, 800
m (2,600 ft) east of Kerby, and 1.2 km
(0.7 mi) east of the confluence between
Holton Creek and the Illinois River. The
land in this unit is 65 percent federally
owned and 35 percent privately owned.
The wet meadow habitat in this unit
is primarily threatened by vegetative
succession. Impacts associated with
timber harvesting, road maintenance,
and ORV use are threats that could
affect the habitat within this unit within
the next few years. The Lomatium
cookii described in this unit is described
as a fairly modest-sized population,
with numbers up to 300 plants. The
population in this unit is threatened by
fragmentation due to woody vegetation
succession. The population is somewhat
scattered around open wet meadow
patches dispersed within a young
woody overstory (ONHIC 2008). Special
management considerations or
protection may be required to restore,
protect, and maintain the PCEs
supported by Unit IV5 due to threats
from road construction, impacts
associated with timber harvesting,
woody vegetative succession, and ORV
use.
Unit IV6A and B: Laurel Road
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV6 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of two
subunits totaling 209 ha (516 ac) of
intact wet meadow habitat that was
occupied by Lomatium cookii at the
time of listing (ONHIC 2008); the
species continues to be found there.
Unit IV6 contains all of the PCEs for
Lomatium cookii and was identified in
the draft recovery plan as the Laurel
Road recovery core area (USFWS 2006,
pp. IV-11, IV-14). The unit is located
west and alongside of the base of Lime
Rock, 1.2 km (0.7 mi) east of the city of
Cave Junction, and follows along
Highway 46 for 1.5 km (0.9 mi). Subunit
IV6A is located 1.3 km (0.8 mi) west of
Lime Rock summit, 1.0 km east of the
junction of Laurel Road and Highway
199, and is roughly parallel to Highway
199 for 1.3 km (0.8 mi), which lies
approximately 1.0 km (0.6 mi) west of
the subunit. Subunit IV6B is 2.7 km (1.7
mi) east of the confluence of the east
and west forks of the Illinois River and
from the intersection of Holland Loop
Road and Highway 46; it extends
approximately 1.8 km (1.1 mi) to the
northeast and 2.7 km (1.7 mi) to the
north. The land in this unit is 6 percent
federally owned, less than 1 percent
State, and 93 percent privately owned.
Unit IV6 is open meadow and
roadside habitat at the base of Lime
Rock. Highway 46 crosses the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
population and gravel was spread on the
population at a pull-out. The population
continues to thrive and even grows up
through the gravel. J. Kagan described
the population as occurring at the
bottom of a small hill derived of
ultramafic alluvium (ONHDB 1994, p.
9). The two populations in the unit are
some of the most robust populations in
the Illinois Valley. However, the
Lomatium cookii population has been
monitored since April 2003, and after
several years of population size
increases, the population has recently
declined. The specific cause of the
decline is not known.
The primary threats to the habitat in
this unit are periodic roadside
maintenance, occasional roadside
disturbance, woody vegetative
succession, nonnative invasive plants,
and rural development. There are
relatively few nonnative invasive plants
that threaten Lomatium cookii at this
site, perhaps due to the ultramaficderived soils, but roadside maintenance
is expected to occur often along this
stretch of road and could increase the
presence of invasive plants. Several
inadvertent impacts have been caused to
the population by construction
equipment and vehicle traffic and
periodic maintenance to the road.
ODOT manages the population closely
and has been able to ensure that their
road repairs do not affect the
population.
Special management considerations
or protection may be required to restore,
protect, and maintain the PCEs
supported by Unit IV6 due to threats
from rural development, roadside
maintenance, woody vegetative
succession, and invasive, nonnative
plant species.
Unit IV7: Illinois River Forks State Park
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV7 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of 55 ha (136
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat.
Lomatium cookii has been known from
this unit since the time of listing
(ONHIC 2008). Unit IV7 contains all of
the PCEs for Lomatium cookii and was
identified in the draft recovery plan as
the River Forks State Park recovery core
area (USFWS 2006, pp. IV-11, IV-14).
The unit is located 500 m (1640 ft) west
of the city of Cave Junction, 600 m
(1,970 ft) southeast of Pomeroy Dam,
and is 230 m (750 ft) east of the
confluence of the east and west forks of
the Illinois River. The unit occurs along
a 2.8 km (1.7 mi) stretch of the West
Fork Illinois River. The unit occurs on
25 percent Federal, 44 percent State,
and 31 percent privately owned land.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37329
This unit is partially managed by the
Oregon Parks and Recreation
Department (OPRD). The OPRD
manages both the Federal and State
property and a management plan is
currently in development to protect and
conserve the habitat that support
Lomatium cookii. Recent monitoring by
Service staff (2008) observed a relatively
robust population spread out alongside
streamside meadow habitat (Service
database 2008).
The primary threats to the habitat in
this unit are natural woody vegetative
succession and rural development.
Agricultural development, incompatible
grazing practices, and invasive,
nonnative, annual plant species are also
potential threats. Special management
considerations or protection may be
required to restore, protect, and
maintain the PCEs supported by Unit
IV7 due to the threats described above.
Unit IV8: Woodcock Mountain
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV8 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of 348 ha (859
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat.
Lomatium cookii was known from this
unit at the time of listing and continues
to occur there (ONHIC 2008). Unit IV8
contains all of the PCEs for Lomatium
cookii and was identified in the draft
recovery plan as part of the Rough and
Ready Creek recovery core area (USFWS
2006, pp. IV-11, IV-14). The unit is
located on Federal and privately owned
land, 2.4 km (1.5 mi) southwest of the
city of Cave Junction, 5.3 km (3.3 mi)
north of O’Brien, is 140 m (ft) west of
the confluence of Woodcock Creek and
the West Fork Illinois River, and occurs
along a 3.3 km (2.0 mi) stretch of West
Side Road. Unit IV7 is 400 m (ft) west
of Highway 199 and roughly parallels
the highway for 5.0 km (3.1 mi). This
unit occurs on 3 percent Federal, 1
percent State, and 96 percent privately
owned land.
This unit contains abundant intact
wet meadow habitat and includes
several populations of Lomatium cookii,
one of which may include more than
5,000 plants. The habitat occupied by
the species is typical moist grassland
dominated by the native bunch grasses
Danthonia californica and Deschampsia
cespitosa. A 39-ha (97-ac) private
property that occurs within the unit is
under a conservation easement. Threats
that face the PCEs in this unit include
woody vegetative succession, rural
development, and incompatible
agricultural development. Special
management considerations or
protection may be required to restore,
protect, and maintain the PCEs
supported by Unit IV8 due to these
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37330
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
threats and potentially from
incompatible grazing practices and
invasive, nonnative, annual plant
species.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Unit IV9: Riverwash
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV9 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of 12 ha (30
ac) of intact wet meadow and
streambank habitat. Lomatium cookii
has been known from this unit since the
time of listing (ONHIC 2008). Unit IV9
contains all of the PCEs for Lomatium
cookii and was identified in the draft
recovery plan as part of the Rough and
Ready Creek recovery core area (USFWS
2006, pp. IV-11, IV-14). The unit is
located 4.2 km (2.6 mi) south of Cave
Junction, 6.1 km (3.8 mi) northnortheast of O’Brien, and is located
along the east bend of the West Fork
Illinois River, 700 m (2,300 ft) south
(upstream) of the confluence between
Woodcock Creek and the West Fork
Illinois River. The land in the unit is 34
percent federally owned, 5 percent
State-owned, and 61 percent privately
owned.
This unit includes the Danna Lytjen
Special Management Area, a property of
ODOT. It has been monitored by ODOT
periodically since the time it was
discovered (D. Sharp, pers. comm.
2009). The population within this unit
is smaller (fewer than 50 plants) and
occurs in wet meadow habitat alongside
a ditch. The primary threats to habitat
in this unit are periodic roadside
maintenance, vegetative succession,
occasional roadside disturbance, and
rural development. Special management
considerations or protection may be
required to restore, protect, and
maintain the PCEs supported by Unit
IV9 due to threats from agricultural
development, incompatible grazing
practices, occasional roadside activities,
vegetative succession, and rural
development.
Unit IV10: French Flat North
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV10 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of 45 ha (110
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat.
Lomatium cookii has been known from
this unit since the time of listing
(ONHIC 2008). Unit IV10 contains all of
the PCEs for Lomatium cookii and was
identified in the draft recovery plan as
part of the Rough and Ready Creek
recovery core area (USFWS 2006, pp.
IV-11, IV-14). The unit is located 3.7 km
(2.3 mi) south of Cave Junction, 900 m
(2,950 ft) north of the intersection of
Sherrier Drive and Raintree Drive, 1.7
km (1.1 mi) southwest of the confluence
of Althouse Creek and the East Fork
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
Illinois River, and parallels a 300 m (980
ft) stretch of Rockydale Road. The land
in this unit is under 22 percent Federal
ownership and 78 percent private
ownership. A portion of this unit occurs
on BLM-managed land (Kaye and
Thorpe 2008, p. 1).
The two Lomatium cookii populations
in this unit occur in open mixed oak–
conifer habitat. Aerial imagery suggests
that the wet meadow habitat is
fragmented, may be slowly degrading,
and may require some management to
maintain early seral stage vegetation
(USDA 2006a). The primary threats to
the PCEs in this unit are rural
development and vegetative succession.
Special management considerations
or protection may be required to restore,
protect, and maintain the PCEs
supported by Unit IV10 due to threats
from rural development and woody
vegetative succession.
Unit IV11: Rough and Ready Creek
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV11 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of 61 ha (152
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat.
Lomatium cookii has been known from
this unit since the time of listing
(ONHIC 2008). Unit IV11 contains all of
the PCEs for Lomatium cookii and was
identified in the draft recovery plan as
part of the Rough and Ready Creek
recovery core area (USFWS 2006, pp.
IV-11, IV-14). The unit roughly follows
along and is adjacent to a 1.9 km (1.2
mi) stretch of Airport Drive, is located
3 km (1.9 mi) north of O’Brien, 900 m
(2,950 ft) west of the Rough and Ready
Forest Wayside State Park, and is 122 m
(400 ft) east of the confluence with the
Illinois River and Rough and Ready
Creek. The land in this unit is 48
percent federally owned and 52 percent
privately owned.
A grouping of Lomatium cookii
patches has been monitored within this
unit for over 10 years (Kaye and Thorpe
2008, p. 26). Although the population is
stable and not considered a large
population, it appears to be resilient to
various ORV threats and alterations in
hydrology.
Threats present at this unit are in the
form of ORVs, nonnative invasive forbs,
alteration in hydrology caused by
roadside maintenance, and natural
succession. Special management
considerations or protection may be
required to restore, protect, and
maintain the PCEs supported by Unit
IV11 due to these threats.
Unit IV12: French Flat Middle
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV12 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of 617 ha
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(1,524 ac) of intact wet meadow habitat.
The unit has been occupied by
Lomatium cookii since the time of
listing. Unit IV12 contains all of the
PCEs for Lomatium cookii and was
identified in the draft recovery plan as
the French Flat recovery core area
(USFWS 2006, pp. IV-11, IV-14). The
unit is located 4.5 km (2.8 mi) east of
Cave Junction, 3.7 km (2.3 mi) northeast
of O’Brien, 140 m (460 ft) north of
Esterly Lakes, 1.4 km (0.9 mi) northeast
of Indian Hill, 300 m (960 ft) east of the
confluence of Rough and Ready Creek
and the West Fork Illinois River, and
follows along a 5.0 km (3.1 mi) stretch
of Rockydale Road. Land within the unit
is under 45 percent Federal ownership
and 55 percent private ownership.
This unit contains some of the largest
areas of intact wet meadow habitat
within the Illinois Valley. Several
Lomatium cookii populations occur
within this unit. Two of the Lomatium
cookii populations in the unit, each in
excess of 40,000 individuals, have been
closely monitored on BLM land for over
10 years (Kaye and Thorpe 2008, pp.
16–25). Although the populations are
robust and dense compared to other
locations, the rate of growth has been
declining and plants may be slowly
succumbing to various naturally caused
threats, including woody vegetative
succession and vole herbivory (Kaye
and Thorpe 2008, pp. 16–25).
Threats commonly observed within
this unit are: illegal ORV use; vandalism
(related to ORV use); garbage dumping;
mining; woody vegetative succession;
substantial rodent herbivory on
Lomatium cookii plants (voles); and
competition with invasive, nonnative
annual plant species. Several other
Lomatium cookii populations that occur
within this unit are not closely
monitored. Therefore, special
management considerations or
protection may be required to restore,
protect, and maintain the PCEs
supported by Unit IV12 due to the
threats described above.
Unit IV13: Indian Hill
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV13 as critical habitat for Lomatium
cookii. This unit consists of 18 ha (45
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat. It has
been occupied by Lomatium cookii
since the time of listing. Unit IV13
contains all of the PCEs for Lomatium
cookii, and was identified in the draft
recovery plan as the Indian Hill
recovery core area (USFWS 2006, pp.
IV-11, IV-14). The unit is adjacent to
and lies east of a 900 m (2,950 ft) stretch
of the West Fork Illinois River, located
approximately 300 m south (upstream)
of the confluence of Rough and Ready
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37331
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Creek and the West Fork Illinois River.
The unit is 1.8 km (1.1 mi) northeast of
O’Brien and is 350 m (1,150 ft)
northwest of Indian Hill. The land
within this unit is 83 percent federally
owned and 17 percent privately owned.
This unit contains a comma-shaped
wet meadow supporting one Lomatium
cookii population in excess of 9,000
plants. Lomatium cookii has been
closely monitored in this unit for over
10 years (Kaye and Thorpe 2008, p 28).
Although this population appears to be
threatened by succession of woody
vegetation and herbivory by voles,
population monitoring indicates the
population is stable.
Special management considerations
or protection may be required to restore,
protect, and maintain the PCEs
supported by Unit IV6 due to threats
from natural woody vegetative
succession and vole herbivory.
Unit IV14: Waldo
We are proposing to designate Unit
IV14 as critical habitat for Lomatium
suggests that the wet meadow habitat, as
of 2006, is slowly becoming degraded
and may require some management to
maintain early seral stage vegetation
(USDA 2006a). The primary threats to
the habitat in this unit are mining and
natural vegetation succession.
Special management considerations
or protection may be required to restore,
protect, and maintain the PCEs
supported by Unit IV14 due to threats
from woody vegetative succession and
mineral mining.
Tables 1 and 2 provide a summary of
the approximate area (ha and ac) of
units in Jackson County by Federal,
State, county, municipal, and private
ownership determined to meet the
definition of critical habitat for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii. Table 3 provides
a summary of the approximate area (ha/
ac) of units for Lomatium cookii in
Josephine County by Federal, State, and
private ownership determined to meet
the definition of critical habitat.
cookii. This unit consists of 40 ha (100
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat. This
unit is presently occupied by the
species and was occupied at the time of
listing. Unit IV14 contains all of the
PCEs for Lomatium cookii and was
identified in the draft recovery plan as
the French Flat recovery core area
(USFWS 2006, pp. IV-11, IV-14). The
unit is located 3.4 km (2.1 mi) eastsoutheast O’Brien, 230 m (750 ft) west
of Waldo, 2.4 km (1.5 mi) southeast of
Indian Hill, and is 1.5 km (0.9 mi)
southwest of Esterly Lakes. The land
within this unit is under 59 percent
Federal ownership and 41 percent
private ownership.
This unit includes a single Lomatium
cookii population on BLM-managed
land that has not been visited since
1998. Aerial imagery suggests that the
open mixed oak-conifer habitat in the
unit includes patchy wet meadows and
appears to be threatened by succession
of natural woody vegetation succession
and mineral mining. Aerial imagery
TABLE 1—CRITICAL HABITAT UNITS AND OWNERSHIP IN HECTARES (ACRES) FOR Limnanthes floccosa SSP. grandiflora IN
JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON (ALL TOTALS ARE ROUNDED).
Critical Habitat Unit
Private
Municipal
County
State
Federal
Total Area
Shady Cove (RV1)
8 (20)
8 (20)
Hammel Road (RV2)
84 (207)
.....
.....
.....
.....
84 (207)
North Eagle Point (RV3A-D)
539 (1,331)
.....
.....
.....
.....
539 (1,331)
Rogue Plains (RV4)
244.5 (604)
.....
0.5 (1)
.....
.....
245 (605)
Table Rock Terrace (RV5)
49 (121.5)
.....
.....
.....
.....
49 (122)
White City (RV6A-H)
447 (1,104)
87 (214)
68 (168)
246 (609)
.....
848 (2,095)
Agate Lake (RV7)
397 (981.5)
.....
.....
.....
29 (71)
426 (1,053)
Whetstone Creek (RV8)
290 (719.5)
37 (91.5)
0.2 (0.5)
34 (84)
.....
362 (896)
Total Area
2,059.5 (5,088)
124 (306)
69 (170)
279.5 (691)
29 (71)
2,561 (6,327)
TABLE 2—CRITICAL HABITAT UNITS AND OWNERSHIP IN HECTARES (ACRES) FOR Lomatium cookii IN JACKSON COUNTY,
OREGON (TOTALS ARE ROUNDED).
Critical Habitat Unit
Private
Municipal
County
State
Federal
Total Area
324 (802)
87 (214)
56 (138)
141 (349)
.....
608 (1,503)
Whetstone Creek (RV8)
291 (719.5)
37 (91.5)
0.2 (0.5)
34 (84)
.....
362 (895.5)
Medford Airport (RV9A-B)
3 (8)
0.4 (1)
73 (180)
.....
.....
76 (190)
Total Area
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
White City (RV6A, F, G, H)
620 (1,532)
124.4 (307)
129.2 (319)
174 (430)
.....
1,046 (2,589)
TABLE 3—CRITICAL HABITAT UNITS AND OWNERSHIP IN HECTARES (ACRES) FOR Lomatium cookii IN JOSEPHINE COUNTY,
OREGON (TOTALS ARE ROUNDED).
Critical Habitat Unit
Private
Anderson Creek (IV1)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
53.4 (131.9)
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
State
.....
Fmt 4701
Federal
.....
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
Total Area
53 (132)
28JYP2
37332
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 3—CRITICAL HABITAT UNITS AND OWNERSHIP IN HECTARES (ACRES) FOR Lomatium cookii IN JOSEPHINE COUNTY,
OREGON (TOTALS ARE ROUNDED).—Continued
Critical Habitat Unit
Private
State
Federal
Total Area
Draper Creek (IV2)
39.4 (97.3)
.....
.....
39 (97)
Reeves Creek North (IV3)
44 (109)
.....
61 (151)
105 (260)
Reeves Creek East (IV4)
33 (81.4)
.....
36 (88.5)
69 (170)
Reeves Creek South (IV5)
55 (137)
.....
103 (254)
158 (391)
Laurel Road (IV6A-B)
192.8 (476)
4 (10)
12 (29.5)
209 (516)
Illinois River Forks State Park (IV7)
17 (42)
24.8 (60)
13.8 (34)
55 (136)
Woodcock Mountain (IV8)
336.9 (832.5)
.....
10.7 (26.5)
348 (859)
Riverwash (IV9)
7.4 (18.3)
0.6 (1.5)
4.1 (10.2)
12 (30)
French Flat North (IV10)
34.8 (86)
.....
9.8 (24.3)
45 (110)
Rough and Ready Creek (IV11)
31.6 (78)
.....
29.7 (73.5)
61 (152)
French Flat Middle (IV12)
351.5 (868.6)
.....
277.2 (685)
617 (1,524)
Indian Hill (IV12)
3.1 (7.7)
.....
15.1 (37.3)
18 (45)
Waldo (IV14)
16.4 (40.6)
.....
28.9 (59)
40 (100)
Total Area
1,215.9 (3,006.3)
29.4 (71.5)
601.3 (1,472.8)
1829 (4,521)
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Effects of Critical Habitat Designation
Section 7 Consultation
Section 7(a)(2) of the Act requires
Federal agencies, including the Service,
to ensure that actions they fund,
authorize, or carry out are not likely to
destroy or adversely modify critical
habitat. However, decisions by the
courts of appeals for the Fifth and Ninth
Circuits have invalidated our regulatory
definition of ‘‘destruction or adverse
modification’’ (50 CFR 402.02) (see
Gifford Pinchot Task Force v. U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 378 F. 3d 1059
(9th Cir 2004) and Sierra Club v. U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service et al., 245 F.3d
434, 442F (5th Cir 2001)). Instead, we
rely upon the statutory provisions of the
Act to make that determination. Under
the statutory provisions of the Act, the
key factor in determining whether an
action will destroy or adversely modify
critical habitat is whether, with
implementation of the proposed Federal
action, the affected critical habitat
would remain functional (or retain those
PCEs that relate to the ability of the area
to support the species) to serve its
intended conservation role for the
species.
Section 7(a) of the Act requires
Federal agencies, including the Service,
to evaluate their actions with respect to
any species that is proposed or listed as
endangered or threatened and with
respect to its critical habitat, if any is
proposed or designated. Regulations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
implementing this interagency
cooperation provision of the Act are
codified at 50 CFR part 402.
Section 7(a)(4) of the Act requires
Federal agencies to confer with the
Service on any action that is likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of a
species proposed for listing or result in
destruction or adverse modification of
proposed critical habitat. This is a
procedural requirement only, as any
conservation recommendations in a
conference report or opinion are strictly
advisory. However, once proposed
species become listed, or proposed
critical habitat is designated as final, the
full prohibitions of section 7(a)(2) of the
Act apply to any Federal action. The
primary utility of the conference
procedures is to maximize the
opportunity for a Federal agency to
adequately consider proposed species
and critical habitat and avoid potential
delays in implementing their proposed
action as a result of the section 7(a)(2)
compliance process, should those
species be listed or the critical habitat
designated.
We may conduct conferences either
informally or formally. We typically use
informal conferences as a means of
providing advisory conservation
recommendations to assist the agency in
eliminating conflicts that the proposed
action may cause with respect to the
proposed critical habitat. We typically
use formal conferences when the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Federal agency or the Service believes
the proposed action is likely to
adversely affect a species proposed for
listing or degrade proposed critical
habitat in some manner.
We generally provide the results of an
informal conference in a conference
report, while we provide the results of
a formal conference in a conference
opinion. We typically prepare
conference opinions on proposed
critical habitat in accordance with
procedures contained at 50 CFR 402.14,
as if the proposed critical habitat was
already designated. If no substantial
new information or changes in the
action alter the content of the opinion,
we may adopt the conference opinion as
the biological opinion when the critical
habitat is designated (see 50 CFR
402.10(d)).
If a species is listed or critical habitat
is designated, section 7(a)(2) of the Act
requires Federal agencies to ensure that
activities they authorize, fund, or carry
out are not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of such a species or
to destroy or adversely modify its
critical habitat. Activities on State,
tribal, local, or private lands requiring a
Federal permit (such as a permit from
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under
section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or a permit from us
under section 10 of the Act) or involving
some other Federal action (such as
funding from the Federal Highway
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Administration, Federal Aviation
Administration, or the Federal
Emergency Management Agency) are
subject to the section 7(a)(2)
consultation process. Federal actions
not affecting listed species or critical
habitat, and actions on State, tribal,
local, or private lands that are not
federally funded, authorized, or
permitted, do not require section 7(a)(2)
consultations.
If a Federal action may affect a listed
species or its critical habitat, the
responsible Federal agency (action
agency) must enter into consultation
with us. At the conclusion of this
consultation, the Service will issue
either:
(1) a concurrence letter for Federal
actions that may affect, but are not
likely to adversely affect, listed species
or critical habitat; or
(2) a biological opinion for Federal
actions that may affect, but are likely to
adversely affect, listed species or critical
habitat.
If we issue a biological opinion
concluding that a project is likely to
result in jeopardy to a listed species or
the destruction or adverse modification
of critical habitat, we also provide
reasonable and prudent alternatives to
the project, if any are identifiable, to
avoid these outcomes. We define
‘‘reasonable and prudent alternatives’’ at
50 CFR 402.02 as alternative actions
identified during consultation that:
• Can be implemented in a manner
consistent with the intended purpose of
the action,
• Can be implemented consistent with
the scope of the Federal agency’s legal
authority and jurisdiction,
• Are economically and
technologically feasible, and
• Would, in the Director’s opinion,
avoid jeopardizing the continued
existence of the listed species or
destroying or adversely modifying
critical habitat.
Reasonable and prudent alternatives
can vary from slight project
modifications to extensive redesign or
relocation of the project. Costs
associated with implementing a
reasonable and prudent alternative are
similarly variable.
Regulations at 50 CFR 402.16 require
Federal agencies to reinitiate
consultation on previously reviewed
actions in instances where a new
species is listed or critical habitat is
subsequently designated that may be
affected and the Federal agency has
retained discretionary involvement or
control over the action. Consequently,
some Federal agencies may need to
request reinitiation of consultation with
us on actions for which formal
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
consultation has been completed, if
those actions with discretionary
involvement may affect subsequently
listed species or designated critical
habitat.
Application of the Jeopardy and
Adverse Modification Standards
Jeopardy Standard
Currently, the Service applies an
analytical framework for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii jeopardy analyses that relies
heavily on the importance of known
populations to the species’ survival and
recovery. The section 7(a)(2) of the Act
analysis is focused not only on these
populations but also on the habitat
conditions necessary to support them.
The jeopardy analysis usually
expresses the survival and recovery
needs of Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii in a
qualitative fashion without making
distinctions between what is necessary
for survival and what is necessary for
recovery. Generally, the jeopardy
analysis focuses on the range-wide
statuses of L. f. ssp. grandiflora and
Lomatium cookii, respectively, the
factors responsible for that condition,
and what is necessary for each species
to survive and recover. An emphasis is
also placed on characterizing the
conditions of L. f. ssp. grandiflora and
Lomatium cookii in the area affected by
the proposed Federal action and the role
of affected populations in the survival
and recovery of L. f. ssp. grandiflora and
Lomatium cookii. That context is then
used to determine the significance of
adverse and beneficial effects of the
proposed Federal action and any
cumulative effects for purposes of
making the jeopardy determination.
Adverse Modification Standard
The key factor related to the adverse
modification determination is whether,
with implementation of the proposed
Federal action, the affected critical
habitat would continue to serve its
intended conservation role for the
species. Generally, the conservation role
of Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii critical habitat
units is to support the various lifehistory needs and provide for the
conservation of the species. Activities
that may destroy or adversely modify
critical habitat are those that alter the
PCEs to an extent that appreciably
reduces the conservation value of
critical habitat for L. f. ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii.
Section 4(b)(8) of the Act requires us
to briefly evaluate and describe in any
proposed or final regulation that
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37333
designates critical habitat those
activities involving a Federal action that
may destroy or adversely modify such
habitat, or that may be affected by such
designation. Activities that may destroy
or adversely modify critical habitat may
also jeopardize the continued existence
of the species.
Activities that, when carried out,
funded, or authorized by a Federal
agency, may affect critical habitat and
therefore result in consultation for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii include, but are
not limited to:
(1) Actions that would result in
ground disturbance to vernal pool–
mounded prairie and seasonally wet
meadow habitat. Such activities could
include, but are not limited to:
residential or recreational development,
ORV activity, dispersed recreation, new
road construction or widening, existing
road maintenance, and incompatible
grazing practices (such as grazing during
the winter, when pools are wet and
most likely to be subjected to disruption
of the underlying clay layer). These
activities could cause direct loss of
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii-occupied areas,
and affect vernal pools and wet
meadows by damaging or eliminating
habitat, altering soil composition due to
increased erosion, and increasing
densities of nonnative plant species.
In addition, changes in soil
composition may lead to changes in the
vegetation composition, such as growth
of shrub cover resulting in decreased
density or vigor of individual
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii plants. These
activities may also lead to changes in
water flows and inundation periods that
would degrade, reduce, or eliminate the
habitat necessary for the growth and
reproduction of L. f. ssp. grandiflora and
Lomatium cookii.
(2) Actions that would significantly
alter the hydrological regime of the
vernal pool–mounded prairie and wet
meadow habitat. Such activities could
include residential or recreational
development adjacent to meadows, ORV
activity, dispersed recreation, new road
construction or widening, and existing
road maintenance. These activities
could alter surface soil layers and
hydrological regime in a manner that
promotes loss of soil matrix components
and moisture necessary to support the
growth and reproduction of Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii.
(3) Actions that would significantly
reduce pollination or seed set
(reproduction). Such activities could
include, but are not limited to,
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37334
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
residential or recreational development,
and grazing or mowing prior to seed set.
These activities could prevent
reproduction by removal or destruction
of reproductive plant parts.
We consider all of the units proposed
as critical habitat to contain the physical
and biological features essential to the
conservation of Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii.
All units are within the geographic
range of the species and, with the
possible exception of unit RV1, which
has not been surveyed recently, are
currently occupied by either L. f. ssp.
grandiflora or Lomatium cookii or both.
To ensure that their actions do not
jeopardize the continued existence of L.
f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii,
Federal agencies already consult with us
on activities in areas currently occupied
by the two plant species, or in
unoccupied areas if the species may be
affected by the action.
Exemptions
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Application of Section 4(a)(3) of the Act
The Sikes Act Improvement Act of
1997 (Sikes Act) (16 U.S.C. 670a)
required each military installation that
includes land and water suitable for the
conservation and management of
natural resources to complete an
integrated natural resources
management plan (INRMP) by
November 17, 2001. An INRMP
integrates implementation of the
military mission of the installation with
stewardship of the natural resources
found on the base. Each INRMP
includes:
• An assessment of the ecological
needs on the installation, including the
need to provide for the conservation of
listed species;
• A statement of goals and priorities;
• A detailed description of
management actions to be implemented
to provide for these ecological needs;
and
• A monitoring and adaptive
management plan.
Among other things, each INRMP
must, to the extent appropriate and
applicable, provide for fish and wildlife
management; fish and wildlife habitat
enhancement or modification; wetland
protection, enhancement, and
restoration where necessary to support
fish and wildlife; and enforcement of
applicable natural resource laws.
The National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law
No. 108-136) amended the Endangered
Species Act to limit areas eligible for
designation as critical habitat.
Specifically, section 4(a)(3)(B)(i) of the
Act (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)(3)(B)(i)) now
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
provides: ‘‘The Secretary shall not
designate as critical habitat any lands or
other geographical areas owned or
controlled by the Department of
Defense, or designated for its use, that
are subject to an integrated natural
resources management plan prepared
under section 101 of the Sikes Act (16
U.S.C. 670a), if the Secretary determines
in writing that such plan provides a
benefit to the species for which critical
habitat is proposed for designation.’’
There are no Department of Defense
lands with a completed INRMP within
the proposed critical habitat
designation. Therefore, there are no
specific lands that meet the criteria for
being exempted from the designation of
critical habitat pursuant to section
4(a)(3) of the Act.
Exclusions
Application of Section 4(b)(2) of the Act
Section 4(b)(2) of the Act states that
the Secretary must designate or make
revisions to critical habitat on the basis
of the best available scientific data after
taking into consideration the economic
impact, national security impact, and
any other relevant impacts of specifying
any particular area as critical habitat.
The Secretary may exclude an area from
critical habitat if he determines that the
benefits of such exclusion outweigh the
benefits of specifying such area as part
of the critical habitat, unless he
determines, based on the best scientific
data available, that the failure to
designate such area as critical habitat
will result in the extinction of the
species. In making that determination,
the legislative history is clear that the
Secretary has broad discretion regarding
which factor(s) to use and how much
weight to give to any factor.
Under section 4(b)(2) of the Act, in
considering whether to exclude a
particular area from the designation, we
must identify the benefits of including
the area in the designation, identify the
benefits of excluding the area from the
designation, and determine whether the
benefits of exclusion outweigh the
benefits of inclusion. If, based on this
analysis, we determine that the benefits
of exclusion outweigh the benefits of
inclusion, we can exclude the area only
if such exclusion would not result in the
extinction of the species.
Under section 4(b)(2) of the Act, we
must consider all relevant impacts,
including economic impacts. In
addition to economic impacts, we
consider a number of factors in a section
4(b)(2) analysis. For example, we
consider whether there are lands owned
by the Department of Defense (DOD)
where a national security impact might
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
exist. We also consider whether
landowners or other public agencies
have developed any Habitat
Conservation Plans (HCPs) for the area,
or whether there are conservation
partnerships that would be encouraged
or discouraged by designation of, or
exclusion from, critical habitat in an
area. In addition, we look at the
presence of tribal lands or Tribal Trust
resources that might be affected, and
consider the government-to-government
relationship of the United States with
the tribal entities. We also consider any
social impacts that might occur because
of the designation. To ensure our final
determination is based on the best
available information, we are inviting
comments on any foreseeable economic,
national security, or other potential
impacts resulting from this proposed
designation of critical habitat from
governmental, business, or private
interests, and in particular, any
potential impacts on small entities.
We are aware of several draft and one
final management plan on lands owned
by public agencies. We will consider for
exclusion under section 4(b)(2) of the
Act any existing management plans
located within proposed critical habitat
units, including the BOR Agate Lake
Management Plan, any State agency
management plans, management plans
on any Medford District BLM locations
occupied by Lomatium cookii, and other
privately or publicly managed lands
about which we receive more
information during the 60–day comment
period.
We are preparing an analysis of the
potential economic impacts of the
proposed designation of critical habitat
for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii. We will
announce the availability of the draft
economic analysis as soon as it is
completed, at which time we will seek
public review and comment. At that
time, copies of the draft economic
analysis will be available for
downloading from the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov, or from the
Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). We
may exclude areas from the final rule
based on the information in the
economic analysis.
At this time, we are not proposing any
specific exclusions of areas from critical
habitat under section 4(b)(2) of the Act
for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii. We will consider
any available information about areas
covered by conservation or management
plans that we should consider for
exclusion from the designation under
section 4(b)(2) of the Act including
whether the benefit of exclusion of
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
those lands would outweigh the benefits
of their inclusion. We specifically
request any information on any
operative or draft habitat conservation
plans for L. f. ssp. grandiflora and
Lomatium cookii that have been
prepared under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the
Act, or any other management or other
conservation plans or agreements that
benefits either plant or their PCEs.
Peer Review
In accordance with our joint policy
published in the Federal Register on
July 1, 1994 (59 FR 34270), we are
obtaining the expert opinions of at least
three appropriate and independent
specialists regarding this proposed rule.
The purpose of peer review is to ensure
that our critical habitat designation is
based on scientifically sound data,
assumptions, and analyses. We have
invited these peer reviewers to comment
during this public comment period on
our specific assumptions and
conclusions in this proposed
designation of critical habitat.
We will consider all comments and
information we receive during this
comment period on this proposed rule
during our preparation of a final
determination. Accordingly, our final
decision may differ from this proposal.
Public Hearings
The Act provides for one or more
public hearings on this proposal, if any
request for public hearings is received
within 45 days of publication of this
proposal. Send your request to the
address listed in FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will schedule
public hearings on this proposal, if any
are requested, and announce the dates,
times, and places of those hearings, as
well as how to obtain reasonable
accommodations, in the Federal
Register and local newspapers at least
15 days before the first hearing.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule is
not significant under Executive Order
(E.O.) 12866. OMB bases its
determination upon the following four
criteria:
1. Whether the rule will have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy or adversely affect an
economic sector, productivity, jobs, the
environment, or other units of the
government.
2. Whether the rule will create
inconsistencies with other Federal
agencies’ actions.
3. Whether the rule will materially
affect entitlements, grants, user fees,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of their recipients.
4. Whether the rule raises novel legal
or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA) of 1996),
whenever an agency is required to
publish a notice of rulemaking for any
proposed or final rule, it must prepare
and make available for public comment
a regulatory flexibility analysis that
describes the effects of the rule on small
entities (such as small businesses, small
organizations, and small government
jurisdictions). However, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required if the
head of the agency certifies the rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The SBREFA amended the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) to
require Federal agencies to provide a
statement of the factual basis for
certifying that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
At this time, the Service lacks the
available economic information
necessary to provide an adequate factual
basis for the required RFA finding.
Therefore, the RFA finding is deferred
until completion of the draft economic
analysis prepared pursuant to section
4(b)(2) of the Act and E.O. 12866. This
draft economic analysis will provide the
required factual basis for the RFA
finding. Upon completion of the draft
economic analysis, the Service will
publish a notice of availability of the
draft economic analysis of the proposed
designation and reopen the public
comment period for the proposed
designation. The Service will include
with the notice of availability, as
appropriate, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis or a certification that
the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities accompanied
by the factual basis for that
determination. The Service has
concluded that deferring the RFA
finding until completion of the draft
economic analysis is necessary to meet
the purposes and requirements of the
RFA. Deferring the RFA finding in this
manner will ensure that the Service
makes a sufficiently informed
determination based on adequate
economic information and provides the
necessary opportunity for public
comment.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37335
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501),
the Service makes the following
findings:
(a) This rule will not produce a
Federal mandate. In general, a Federal
mandate is a provision in legislation,
statute, or regulation that would impose
an enforceable duty upon State, local,
tribal governments, or the private sector
and includes both ‘‘Federal
intergovernmental mandates’’ and
‘‘Federal private sector mandates.’’
These terms are defined in 2 U.S.C.
658(5)-(7). ‘‘Federal intergovernmental
mandate’’ includes a regulation that
‘‘would impose an enforceable duty
upon State, local, or tribal governments’’
with two exceptions. It excludes ‘‘a
condition of Federal assistance.’’ It also
excludes ‘‘a duty arising from
participation in a voluntary Federal
program,’’ unless the regulation ‘‘relates
to a then-existing Federal program
under which $500,000,000 or more is
provided annually to State, local, and
tribal governments under entitlement
authority,’’ if the provision would
‘‘increase the stringency of conditions of
assistance’’ or ‘‘place caps upon, or
otherwise decrease, the Federal
Government’s responsibility to provide
funding,’’ and the State, local, or tribal
governments ‘‘lack authority’’ to adjust
accordingly. At the time of enactment,
these entitlement programs were:
Medicaid; AFDC work programs; Child
Nutrition; Food Stamps; Social Services
Block Grants; Vocational Rehabilitation
State Grants; Foster Care, Adoption
Assistance, and Independent Living;
Family Support Welfare Services; and
Child Support Enforcement. ‘‘Federal
private sector mandate’’ includes a
regulation that ‘‘would impose an
enforceable duty upon the private
sector, except (i) a condition of Federal
assistance or (ii) a duty arising from
participation in a voluntary Federal
program.’’
The designation of critical habitat
does not impose a legally binding duty
on non-Federal government entities or
private parties. Under the Act, the only
regulatory effect is that Federal agencies
must ensure that their actions do not
destroy or adversely modify critical
habitat under section 7. While nonFederal entities that receive Federal
funding, assistance, or permits, or that
otherwise require approval or
authorization from a Federal agency for
an action, may be indirectly affected by
the designation of critical habitat, the
legally binding duty to avoid
destruction or adverse modification of
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37336
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
critical habitat rests squarely on the
Federal agency. Furthermore, to the
extent that non-Federal entities are
indirectly affected because they receive
Federal assistance or participate in a
voluntary Federal aid program, the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act would
not apply; nor would critical habitat
shift the costs of the large entitlement
programs listed above on to State
governments.
(b) We do not believe that this rule
will significantly or uniquely affect
small governments because small
governments will be affected only to the
extent that any programs having Federal
funds, permits, or other authorized
activities must ensure that their actions
will not adversely affect the critical
habitat. Therefore, a Small Government
Agency Plan is not required. However,
as we conduct our economic analysis,
we will further evaluate this issue and
revise this assessment if appropriate.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Takings
In accordance with E.O. 12630
(Government Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Private
Property Rights), we have analyzed the
potential takings implications of
designating critical habitat for each of
the two species in a takings implications
assessment. The takings implications
assessment concludes that this
designation of critical habitat for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii does not pose
significant takings implications for
lands within or affected by the proposed
designation.
Federalism
In accordance with E.O. 13132
(Federalism), this proposed rule does
not have significant Federalism effects.
A Federalism assessment is not
required. In keeping with Department of
the Interior policy, we requested
information from, and coordinated
development of, this proposed critical
habitat designation with appropriate
State resource agencies in Oregon. The
designation of critical habitat for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii would impose no
additional restrictions to those currently
in place and, therefore, would have
little incremental impact on State and
local governments and their activities.
The designation may have some benefit
to these governments because the areas
that contain the features essential for the
conservation of the species would be
more clearly defined, and the primary
constituent elements of the habitat
necessary to the conservation of the
species would be specifically identified.
This information would not alter where
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
and what federally sponsored activities
may occur. However, it may assist local
governments in long-range planning
(rather than having them wait for caseby-case section 7 consultations to
occur).
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with E.O. 12988 (Civil
Justice Reform), the Office of the
Solicitor has determined that the rule
does not unduly burden the judicial
system and that it meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order. We have issued this
proposed critical habitat designation in
accordance with the provisions of the
Act. This proposed rule identifies the
primary constituent elements within the
designated areas to assist the public in
understanding the habitat needs of each
of the species being considered in this
proposed rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
This rule does not contain any new
collections of information that require
approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). This rule will not impose
recordkeeping or reporting requirements
on State or local governments,
individuals, businesses, or
organizations. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
It is our position that, outside the
jurisdiction of the United States Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, we do not
need to prepare environmental analyses
as defined by NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) in connection with designating
critical habitat under the Act. We
published a notice outlining our reasons
for this determination in the Federal
Register on October 25, 1983 (48 FR
49244). This position was upheld by the
United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit (Douglas County v.
Babbitt, 48 F.3d 1495 (9th Cir. 1995),
cert. denied 516 U.S. 1042 (1996)).
Clarity of the Rule
We are required by E.O. 12866 and
12988 and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that are unclearly
written, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Government-to-Government
Relationship with Tribes
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal of the
Interior’s manual at 512 DM 2, we
readily acknowledge our responsibility
to communicate meaningfully with
recognized Federal tribes on a
government-to-government basis. In
accordance with Secretarial Order 3206
of June 5, 1997 (American Indian Tribal
Rights, Federal-Tribal Trust
Responsibilities, and the Endangered
Species Act), we readily acknowledge
our responsibilities to work directly
with tribes in developing programs for
healthy ecosystems, to acknowledge that
tribal lands are not subject to the same
controls as Federal public lands, to
remain sensitive to Indian culture, and
to make information available to tribes.
We have determined that there are no
tribal lands that were occupied by
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii at the time of
listing that contain the features essential
for the conservation of the species, and
no tribal lands that are in unoccupied
areas that are essential for the
conservation of the species. Therefore,
this proposed designation of critical
habitat does not involve any tribal
lands.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
Executive Order 13211 (Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use) requires agencies
to prepare Statements of Energy Effects
when undertaking certain actions. This
proposed rule to designate critical
habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii is not
expected to significantly affect energy
supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore,
this action is not a significant energy
action, and no Statement of Energy
Effects is required. However, we will
further evaluate this issue as we
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37337
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
conduct our economic analysis, and
revise this assessment as warranted.
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited
in this rulemaking is available upon
request from the State Supervisor,
Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section) or from https://
www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
Accordingly, we propose to amend
part 17, subchapter B of chapter I, title
50 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
as set forth below:
Author(s)
The primary authors of this document
are the staff of the Roseburg Field Office
of the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 16 U.S.C.
1531–1544; 16 U.S.C. 4201–4245; Pub. L. 99–
625, 100 Stat. 3500; unless otherwise noted.
2. In § 17.12(h), revise the entries for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii under
‘‘FLOWERING PLANTS’’ in the List of
Endangered and Threatened Plants to
read as follows:
§ 17.12
plants.
*
PART 17—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
Endangered and threatened
*
*
(h) * * *
*
Status
When
listed
Species
Historic range
Scientific name
Family
Common name
*
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
Flowering Plants
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora
large-flowered woolly
meadowfoam
U.S.A. (OR)
Limnanthaceae
E
733
17.96(a)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Lomatium cookii
Cook’s lomatium (Cook’s
desert parsley)
U.S.A. (OR)
Apiaceae
E
733
17.96(a)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 17.96(a) by adding an
entry for ‘‘Lomatium cookii’’ in
alphabetical order under Family
Apiaceae and by adding an entry for
‘‘Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora’’
in alphabetical order under Family
Limnanthaceae to read as follows:
§ 17.96
Critical habitat—plants.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Flowering plants.
*
*
*
*
*
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Family Apiaceae: Lomatium cookii
(Cook’s lomatium)
(1) Critical habitat units for Lomatium
cookii are depicted for Jackson and
Josephine Counties, Oregon, on the
maps below.
(2) The primary constituent elements
for Lomatium cookii are:
(i) In the Agate Desert, vernal pools
and ephemeral wetlands and the
adjacent upland margins of these
depressions that hold water for a
sufficient length of time to sustain
Lomatium cookii germination, growth,
and reproduction. These vernal pools or
ephemeral wetlands support native
plant populations and are seasonally
inundated during wet years but do not
necessarily fill with water every year
due to natural variability in rainfall.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
Areas of sufficient size and quality are
likely to have the following
characteristics:
(A) Elevations from 372 to 411 m
(1,220 to 1,350 ft);
(B) Associated dominant native plants
including, not limited to: Alopecurus
geniculatus, Deschampsia
danthonioides, Eryngium petiolatum,
Lasthenia californica, Myosurus
minimus, Navarretia leucocephala ssp.
leucocephala, Phlox gracilis,
Plagiobothrys bracteatus, Trifolium
depauperatum, and Triteleia
hyacinthina; and
(C) A minimum area of 8 ha (20 ac)
to provide intact hydrology and
protection from development and weed
sources.
(ii) In the Illinois River Valley, wet
meadows in Oregon Oak and pine
forests that are seasonally inundated
and support native plant populations.
Areas of sufficient size and quality are
likely to have the following
characteristics:
(A) Elevations between from 383 to
488 m (1,256 to 1,600 ft);
(B) Associated dominant native plants
including, not limited to Achnatherum
lemmonii, Camassia spp., Danthonia
californica, Deschampsia cespitosa,
Festuca roemeri, Poa secunda,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
NA
NA
Ranunculus occidentalis, and
Limnanthes gracilis var. gracilis;
(C) Occur primarily in bottomland
Quercus garryana–Quercus kelloggii–
Pinus ponderosa (Oregon white oak–
California black oak–ponderosa pine)
forest openings along seasonal creeks;
and
(D) A minimum area of 12 ha (30 ac)
to provide intact hydrology and
protection from development and weed
sources.
(iii) In the Agate Desert, the
hydrologically and ecologically
functional system of interconnected
pools or ephemeral wetlands or
depressions within a matrix of
surrounding uplands that together form
vernal pool complexes within the
greater watershed. The associated
features may include the pool basin and
ephemeral wetlands; an intact hardpan
subsoil underlying the surface soils up
to 0.75 m (2.5 ft); and surrounding
uplands, including mound topography
and other geographic and edaphic
features that support systems of
hydrologically interconnected pools and
other ephemeral wetlands (which may
vary in extent depending on sitespecific characteristics of pool size and
depth, soil type, and hardpan depth).
(iv) In the Illinois Valley, the
hydrologically and ecologically
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37338
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
functional system of streams, slopes and
wooded systems that surround and
maintain seasonally wet alluvial
meadows underlain by relatively
undisturbed ultramafic soils within the
greater watershed.
(v) In the Agate Desert, silt, loam, and
clay soils that are of ultramafic and
nonultramafic alluvial origin, with a 0
to 3 percent slope, classified as Agate–
Winlo or Provig–Agate soils.
(vi) In the Illinois Valley, silt, loam,
and clay soils that are of ultramafic and
nonultramafic alluvial origin, with a 0
to 30 percent slope, classified as Abegg
gravelly loam, Brockman clay loam,
Copsey clay, Cornut–Dubakel complex,
Dumps, Eightlar extremely stony clay,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
Evans loam, Foehlin gravelly loam,
Josephine gravelly loam, Kerby loam,
Newberg fine sandy loam, Pearsoll–
Rock outcrop complex, Pollard loam,
Riverwash, Speaker–Josephine gravelly
loam, Takilma cobbly loam, or Takilma
Variant extremely cobbly loam.
(vii) No or negligible presence of
competitive nonnative invasive plant
species. (In this usage, ‘‘negligible’’
means a minimal level of nonnative
plant species that will still allow
Lomatium cookii to continue to survive
and recover.)
(3) Critical habitat does not include
manmade structures (including, but not
limited to, buildings, aqueducts,
runways, roads, and other paved areas)
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
and the land on which they are located
existing within the legal boundaries on
the effective date of this rule and not
containing one or more of the primary
constituent elements.
(4) Critical habitat map units. These
critical habitat units were mapped using
Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 10,
North American Datum 1983 (UTM
NAD 83) coordinates. These coordinates
establish the vertices and endpoints of
the boundaries of the units.
(5) Note: Jackson County Index Map
for critical habitat for Lomatium cookii
follows:
BILLING CODE 4310–55–S
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37339
EP28jy09.000
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
37340
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(6) Unit RV6, subunits A, F, G, and H
for Lomatium cookii: White City,
Jackson County, Oregon.
(i) Unit RV6 for Lomatium cookii
consists of 608 ha (1,503 ac) of intact
vernal pool–mounded prairie and swale
habitats. RV6 is located around White
City, is 1.6 km (1.0 mi) southwest of
Eagle Point, and is 440 m (1,444 ft)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
southeast of the confluence of the Rogue
River and Little Butte Creek. Subunit
RV6A is located north of Whetstone
Creek and is 500 m (1,200 ft) west of the
junction of Highway 62 and Antelope
Road. Subunits RV6F and RV6G are
located approximately 500 feet west of
Dry Creek and are east of Highway 62
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
in White City. Subunit RV6H is located
north of Whetstone Creek and south of
Antelope Road. Subunit RV6H roughly
encircles the Hoover Ponds, east of
Highway 62, and is 850 m (2790 ft) east
of subunit RV6A.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit RV6 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37341
EP28jy09.001
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
37342
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(7) Unit RV8 for Lomatium cookii:
Whetstone Creek, Jackson County,
Oregon.
(i) Unit RV8 for Lomatium cookii
consists of 362 ha (896 ac) of intact
vernal pool–mounded prairie and swale
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
habitat. Unit RV8 is located
approximately 1.4 km (0.9 mi) southeast
of the confluence of the Rogue River and
Whetstone Creek, 2.2 km (1.4 mi)
southwest of Tou Velle State Park, and
2.9 km southeast of the confluence of
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Bear Creek and the Rogue River. The
unit roughly parallels a 2.6 km (1.6 mi)
stretch of Whetstone Creek to the south.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit RV8 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37343
EP28jy09.002
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
37344
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(8) Unit RV9 for Lomatium cookii:
Medford Airport, Jackson County,
Oregon.
(i) Unit RV9 consists of 77 ha (190 ac)
of slightly degraded vernal pool–
mounded prairie habitat. The two
subunits of RV9 are located mostly
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
within the Rogue Valley International –
Medford Airport, approximately 2 km
(1.2 mi) west of Coker Butte and 1.5 km
(0.9 mi) northeast of Bear Creek.
Subunit RV9A is located 1.4 km (0.9 mi)
north of the Rogue Valley International
– Medford Airport and is 300 m (980 ft)
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
east of the junction of Vilas Road and
Table Rock Road. Subunit RV9B is
between Upton Slough and Bear Creek
and 1.7 km northeast of the junction of
Interstate 5 and Highway 62.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit RV9 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
37345
EP28jy09.003
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
37346
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.004
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(9) Note: Josephine County Index Map
for critical habitat for Lomatium cookii
follows:
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(10) Unit IV1 for Lomatium cookii:
Anderson Creek, Josephine County,
Oregon.
(i) Unit IV1 consists of 53 ha (132 ac)
of intact wet meadow habitat. It is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
located 3.5 km (2.2 mi) north of Selma,
14 km (8.8 mi) north of Cave Junction,
along a 1.0 km (0.6 mi) stretch of
Anderson Creek and Highway 199, 2.0
km (1.2 mi) southwest of Hays Hill
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37347
Summit, and is 1.7 km (1.0 mi)
northwest of the junction of Draper
Valley Road and Indian Creek Road.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV1 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.005
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37348
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(11) Unit IV2 for Lomatium cookii:
Draper Creek, Josephine County,
Oregon.
(i) Unit IV2 is composed of 39 ha (97
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat. It is
located 2.7 km (1.7 mi) northeast of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
Selma, 13.5 km (8.4 mi) north of Cave
Junction, along a 900 m (2,900 ft) stretch
of Draper Creek, located 800 m (2,600 ft)
east of Anderson Creek. The unit is 800
m (2,600 ft) north-northwest of the
confluence of Draper Creek and Davis
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37349
Creek and is 200 m (650 ft) southeast of
the junction of Draper Valley Road and
Indian Creek Road.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV2 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.006
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37350
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(12) Unit IV3 for Lomatium cookii:
Reeves Creek North, Josephine County,
Oregon.
(i) Unit IV3 consists of 105 ha (260 ac)
of wet meadow habitat. The unit is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
located 1.4 km (0.9 mi) east of the
confluence between Reeves Creek and
the Illinois River and extends along a
2.0 km (1.2 mi) stretch of Reeves Creek,
beginning 800 m (2,600 ft) northeast of
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37351
the junction of Highway 199 and Reeves
Creek Road.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV3 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.007
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37352
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(13) Unit IV4 for Lomatium cookii:
Reeves Creek East, Josephine County,
Oregon.
(i) Unit IV4 consists of 69 ha (170 ac)
of intact wet meadow habitat. It is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
located 6.2 km (3.9 mi) south of Selma
and 5.3 km (3.3 mi) northwest of Cave
Junction. It occurs along a 500 m (1,640
ft) stretch of Reeves Creek located 700
m (2,300 ft) southeast of Unit IV3.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37353
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV4 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.008
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37354
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(14) Unit IV5 for Lomatium cookii:
Reeves Creek South, Josephine County,
Oregon.
(i) Unit IV5 consists of 158 ha (391 ac)
of intact wet meadow habitat. The unit
is roughly parallel to Highway 199 for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
2.5 km (1.6 mi), which is 500 m (1,640
ft) west of the unit. The unit is located
1.6 km (1.0 mi) north of Cave Junction,
1 km (0.6 mi) southeast of Sauers Flat,
800 m (2,600 ft) east of Kerby, and 1.2
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37355
km (0.7 mi) east of the confluence
between Holton Creek and the Illinois
River.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV5 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.009
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37356
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(15) Unit IV6 for Lomatium cookii:
Laurel Road, Josephine County, Oregon.
(i) Unit IV6 totals 209 ha (516 ac) of
intact wet meadow habitat. It is located
west and alongside of the base of Lime
Rock, 1.2 km (0.7 mi) east of the city of
Cave Junction, and follows along
Highway 46 for 1.5 km (0.9 mi). Subunit
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
IV6A is located 1.3 km (0.8 mi) west of
Lime Rock summit, 1.0 km east of the
junction of Laurel Road and Highway
199, and is roughly parallel to Highway
199 for 1.3 km (0.8 mi), which lies
approximately 1.0 km (0.6 mi) west of
the subunit. Subunit IV6B is 2.7 km (1.7
mi) east of the confluence of the east
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37357
and west forks of the Illinois River and
from the intersection of Holland Loop
Road and Highway 46; it extends
approximately 1.8 km (1.1 mi) to the
northeast and 2.7 km (1.7 mi) to the
north.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV6 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.010
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37358
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(16) Unit IV7 for Lomatium cookii:
Illinois River Forks State Park,
Josephine County, Oregon.
(i) Unit IV7 consists of 55 ha (136 ac)
of intact wet meadow habitat. The unit
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
is located 500 m (1640 ft) west of the
city of Cave Junction, 600 m (1,970 ft)
southeast of Pomeroy Dam, and is 230
m (750 ft) east of the confluence of the
east and west forks of the Illinois River.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37359
The unit occurs along a 2.8 km (1.7 mi)
stretch of the West Fork Illinois River.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV7 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.011
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37360
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(17) Unit IV8 for Lomatium cookii:
Woodcock Mountain, Josephine County,
Oregon.
(i) Unit IV8 consists of 347.5 ha (859
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat. The
unit is located 2.4 km (1.5 mi)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
southwest of the city of Cave Junction,
5.3 km (3.3 mi) north of O’Brien, is 140
m (ft) west of the confluence of
Woodcock Creek and the West Fork
Illinois River, and occurs along a 3.3 km
(2.0 mi) stretch of West Side Road. Unit
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37361
IV7 is 400 m (ft) west of Highway 199
and roughly parallels the highway for
5.0 km (3.1 mi).
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV8 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.012
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37362
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(18) Unit IV9 for Lomatium cookii:
Riverwash, Josephine County, Oregon.
(i) Unit IV9 consists of 12 ha (30 ac)
of intact wet meadow and streambank
habitat. It is located 4.2 km (2.6 mi)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
south of Cave Junction, 6.1 km (3.8 mi)
north-northeast of O’Brien, and is
located along the east bend of the West
Fork Illinois River, 700 m (2,300 ft)
south (upstream) of the confluence
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37363
between Woodcock Creek and the West
Fork Illinois River.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV9 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.013
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37364
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(19) Unit IV10 for Lomatium cookii:
French Flat North, Josephine County,
Oregon.
(i) Unit IV10 consists of 44.5 ha (110
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat. The
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
unit is located 3.7 km (2.3 mi) south of
Cave Junction, 900 m (2,950 ft) north of
the intersection of Sherrier Drive and
Raintree Drive, 1.7 km (1.1 mi)
southwest of the confluence of Althouse
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37365
Creek and the East Fork Illinois River,
and parallels a 300 m (980 ft) stretch of
Rockydale Road.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV10 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.014
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37366
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(20) Unit IV11 for Lomatium cookii:
Rough and Ready Creek, Josephine
County, Oregon.
(i) Unit IV11 consists of 61.5 ha (152
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat. The
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
unit roughly follows along and is
adjacent to a 1.9 km (1.2 mi) stretch of
Airport Drive, is located 3 km (1.9 mi)
north of O’Brien, 900 m (2,950 ft) west
of the Rough and Ready Forest Wayside
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37367
State Park, and is 122 m (400 ft) east of
the confluence with the Illinois River
and Rough and Ready Creek.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV11 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.015
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37368
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(21) Unit IV12 for Lomatium cookii:
French Flat Middle, Josephine County,
Oregon.
(i) Unit IV12 consists of 617 ha (1,524
ac) of intact wet meadow habitat. The
unit is located 4.5 km (2.8 mi) east of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
Cave Junction, 3.7 km (2.3 mi) northeast
of O’Brien, 140 m (460 ft) north of
Esterly Lakes, 1.4 km (0.9 mi) northeast
of Indian Hill, 300 m (960 ft) east of the
confluence of Rough and Ready Creek
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37369
and the West Fork Illinois River, and
follows along a 5.0 km (3.1 mi) stretch
of Rockydale Road.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV12 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.016
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37370
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(22) Unit IV13 for Lomatium cookii:
Indian Hill, Josephine County, Oregon.
(i) Unit IV13 consists of 18 ha (45 ac)
of intact wet meadow habitat. The unit
is located adjacent to and lies east of a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
900 m (2,950 ft) stretch of the West Fork
Illinois River, located approximately
300 m south (upstream) of the
confluence of Rough and Ready Creek
and the West Fork Illinois River. The
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37371
unit is 1.8 km (1.1 mi) northeast of
O’Brien and is 350 m (1,150 ft)
northwest of Indian Hill.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV13 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.017
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37372
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(23) Unit IV14 for Lomatium cookii:
Waldo, Josephine County, Oregon.
(i) Unit IV14 consists of 40 ha (100 ac)
of intact wet meadow habitat. The unit
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
is located 3.4 km (2.1 mi) east-southeast
O’Brien, 230 m (750 ft) west of Waldo,
2.4 km (1.5 mi) southeast of Indian Hill,
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37373
and is 1.5 km (0.9 mi) southwest of
Esterly Lakes.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit IV14 Critical
Habitat for Lomatium cookii follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.018
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37374
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Family Limnanthaceae: Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora (large-flowered
woolly meadowfoam)
(1) Critical habitat units for
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora are
depicted for Jackson County, Oregon, on
the maps below.
(2) The primary constituent elements
for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
are:
(i) Vernal pools or ephemeral
wetlands and the adjacent upland
margins of these depressions that hold
water for a sufficient length of time to
sustain Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora germination, growth, and
reproduction, occurring in the Agate
Desert vernal pool landscape. These
vernal pools or ephemeral wetlands are
seasonally inundated during wet years
but do not necessarily fill with water
every year due to natural variability in
rainfall, and support native plant
populations. Areas of sufficient size and
quality are likely to have the following
characteristics:
(A)Elevations from 372 to 469 m
(1,220 to 1,540 ft);
(B)Associated dominant native plants
including, not limited to: Alopecurus
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
geniculatus, Deschampsia
danthonioides, Eryngium petiolatum,
Lasthenia californica, Myosurus
minimus, Navarretia leucocephala ssp.
leucocephala, Phlox gracilis,
Plagiobothrys bracteatus, Trifolium
depauperatum, and Triteleia
hyacinthine; and
(C)A minimum area of 8 ha (20 ac) to
provide intact hydrology and protection
from development and weed sources.
(ii) The hydrologically and
ecologically functional system of
interconnected pools or ephemeral
wetlands or depressions within a matrix
of surrounding uplands that together
form vernal pool complexes within the
greater watershed. The associated
features may include the pool basin or
depressions; an intact hardpan subsoil
underlying the surface soils up to 0.75
m (2.5 ft); and surrounding uplands,
including mound topography and other
geographic and edaphic features, that
support these systems of hydrologically
interconnected pools and other
ephemeral wetlands (which may vary in
extent depending on site-specific
characteristics of pool size and depth,
soil type and hardpan depth).
(iii) Silt, loam, and clay soils that are
of alluvial origin, with a 0 to 3 percent
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37375
slope, primarily classified as AgateWinlo complex soils, but also including
Coker clay, Carney clay, Provig-Agate
complex soils, and Winlo very gravelly
loam soils.
(iv) No or negligible presence of
competitive nonnative invasive plant
species. (In this usage, ‘‘negligible’’
means a minimal level of nonnative
plant species that will still allow
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora to
continue to survive and recover.)
(3) Critical habitat does not include
manmade structures (including, but not
limited to, buildings, aqueducts,
runways, roads, and other paved areas)
and the land on which they are located
existing within the legal boundaries on
the effective date of this rule and not
containing one or more of the primary
constituent elements.
(4) Critical habitat unit maps. These
critical habitat units were mapped using
Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 10,
North American Datum 1983 (UTM
NAD 83) coordinates. These coordinates
establish the vertices and endpoints of
the boundaries of the units.
(5) Note: Index Map for critical habitat
for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
in Jackson County, Oregon, follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.019
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37376
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(6) Unit RV1 for Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora: Shady Cove, Jackson
County, Oregon.
(i) Unit RV1 consists of approximately
8 ha (20 ha) of intact vernal pool–
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
mounded prairie habitat. The unit is
located 460 m (1,500 ft) west of
Highway 62 and parallels a 430 m (ft)
stretch of the highway. The unit is 0.8
km (0.5 mi) south of Shady Cove, 1.3 km
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37377
(0.8 mi) northeast of Takelma Park, and
is 122 m (400 ft) east of the Rogue River.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit RV1 Critical
Habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.020
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37378
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(7) Unit RV2 for Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora: Hammel Road, Jackson
County, Oregon.
(i) Unit RV 2 consists of
approximately 84 ha (207 ac) of intact
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
vernal pool–mounded prairie. The unit
located 1.2 km (0.75 mi) northeast of the
confluence of Reese Creek and the
Rogue River, 1.3 km (0.8 mi) west of
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37379
Highway 62, and 430 m (1,400 ft) east
of the Rogue River.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit RV2 Critical
Habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.021
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37380
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(8) Unit RV3 for Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora: North Eagle Point,
Jackson County, Oregon.
(i) Unit RV3 is composed of four
subunits and totals 538.5 ha (1,331 ac)
of intact vernal pool habitat. The unit is
located southwest of Mosser Mountain
and northeast of Long Mountain. The
four subunits loosely follow a 6.9 km
(4.3 mi) stretch of Hog Creek beginning
at its origin. Originating 3.8 km (2.4 mi)
east of Highway 62 in subunit RV3D,
Hog Creek runs through RV3C, crosses
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
Highway 62, flows between RV3B
(located 100 m (328 ft) west of Highway
62) and RV3A (located 600 m (1,970 ft)
west of Highway 62), before emptying
into the Rogue River after 2.4 km (1.5
mi). Subunit RV3A is located 560 m
(1,837 ft) southeast of the confluence of
Reese Creek and the Rogue River.
Subunit RV3B is located 100 m (328 ft)
west of Highway 62 at the intersection
of Ball Road and extends along an 835
m (2,740 ft) stretch of Hog Creek.
Subunit RV3C is located 2 km (1.2 mi)
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37381
north of Eagle Point (see Index map) and
extends 2.6 km (1.6 mi) south of the
junction of Ball Road and Reese Creek
Road. Subunit RV3D is located 3.2 km
(2 mi) east of Long Mountain and is 2.4
km (1.5 mi) southeast of the junction of
Highway 62 and Ball Road. It extends
along a 1.8 km (1.1 mi) stretch of Hog
Creek.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit RV3 Critical
Habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.022
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37382
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(9) Unit RV4 for Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora: Rogue Plains, Jackson
County, Oregon.
(i) Unit RV4 consists of 245 ha (605
ac) of intact vernal pool–mounded
prairie habitat. The unit is located 122
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
m (400 ft) southeast of the junction of
Highway 234 and Modoc Road. It
extends 2 km (1.2 mi) south along
Modoc Road from the intersection, is
located 1.4 km (0.87 mi) southwest of
Dodge Bridge, and 1.0 km (0.6 mi)
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37383
northwest of Rattlesnake Rapids on the
Rogue River.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit RV4 Critical
Habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.023
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37384
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(10) Unit RV5 for Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora: Table Rock Terrace,
Jackson County, Oregon.
(i) Unit RV5 includes 49.5 ha (122 ac)
of intact vernal pool–mounded prairie
habitat. The unit is located on privately
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
owned land 670 m (2,200 ft) north of the
junction of Modoc and Antioc Roads, is
1.4 km (0.9 mi) east of Upper Table
Rock, and 650 m (2,300 ft) west of the
Rogue River. This unit follows along an
800 m (2,600 ft) stretch of Modoc Road
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37385
to the east of the unit and a 700 m (2,300
ft) stretch of Antioc Road to the west of
the unit.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit RV5 Critical
Habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.024
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37386
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(11) Unit RV6 for Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora: White City, Jackson
County, Oregon.
(i) Unit RV6 for Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora is 848 ha (2,095 ac) in
size and includes intact vernal pool–
mounded prairie and swale habitats.
The unit is located around White City,
is 1.6 km (1.0 mi) southwest of Eagle
Point, and is 440 m (1,444 ft) southeast
of the confluence of the Rogue River and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
Little Butte Creek. Subunit RV6A is
located north of Whetstone Creek and is
500 m (1,200 ft) west of the junction of
Highway 62 and Antelope Road.
Subunits RV6B, RV6C, RV6D, and RV6E
are located north of Avenue G in White
City, south of Little Butte Creek, and
670 m (2,200 ft) southwest of Antelope
Creek. Subunits RV6F and RV6G are
located approximately 500 feet west of
Dry Creek and are east of Highway 62
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37387
in White City. Subunit RV6H is located
north of Whetstone Creek and south of
Antelope Road. Subunit RV6H roughly
encircles the Hoover Ponds, east of
Highway 62, and is 850 m (2790 ft) east
of subunit RV6A.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit RV6 Critical
Habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.025
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37388
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(12) Unit RV7: for Limnanthes
floccosa spp. grandiflora: Agate Lake,
Jackson County, Oregon.
(i) Unit RV7 consists of 426 ha (1,053
ac) of intact vernal pool–mounded
prairie and swale habitat. The unit is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
located 500 m (1,640 ft) east of the Agate
Reservoir, along a 5.4-km (3.4-mi)
stretch roughly parallel and between
Dry Creek and Antelope Creek, is 330 m
(1,080 ft) north of Tater Hill, and is 1.4
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37389
km (0.9 mi) southeast of the confluence
of Dry Creek and Antelope Creek.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit RV7 Critical
Habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.026
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37390
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(13) Unit RV8 for Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora: Whetstone Creek,
Jackson County, Oregon.
(i) Unit RV8 consists of 362.5 ha (896
ac) of intact vernal pool–mounded
prairie and swale habitat. The unit is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
located approximately 1.4 km (0.9 mi)
southeast of the confluence of the Rogue
River and Whetstone Creek, 2.2 km (1.4
mi) southwest of Tou Velle State Park,
and 2.9 km southeast of the confluence
of Bear Creek and the Rogue River. The
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37391
unit roughly parallels a 2.6 km (1.6 mi)
stretch of Whetstone Creek to the south.
(ii) Note: Map of Unit RV8 Critical
Habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
*
*
Dated: July 13, 2009
Jane Lyder
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks
[FR Doc. E9–17522 Filed 7–27–09; 8:45 am]
*
BILLING CODE 4310–55–C
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:24 Jul 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28JYP2.SGM
28JYP2
EP28jy09.027
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
37392
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 28, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37314-37392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17522]
[[Page 37313]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of the Interior
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fish and Wildlife Service
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Designation of
Critical Habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora (Large-
Flowered Woolly Meadowfoam) and Lomatium cookii (Cook's Lomatium);
Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 37314]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018-AW21
[Docket No. FWS-R1-ES-2009-0046] [92210 1117-0000-B4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed
Designation of Critical Habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora (Large-Flowered Woolly Meadowfoam) and Lomatium cookii
(Cook's Lomatium)
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
designate critical habitat for two plants, Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora (large-flowered woolly meadowfoam) and Lomatium cookii
(Cook's lomatium) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(Act). We are proposing to designate 2,561 hectares (ha) (6,327 acres
(ac)) as critical habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora in
Jackson County, Oregon, and 2,875 ha (7,104 ac) as critical habitat for
Lomatium cookii in Jackson and Josephine Counties, Oregon. The total
critical habitat area proposed in this rule, including critical habitat
units that overlap for the two species, is 4,467 ha (11,038 ac).
DATES: To provide us with adequate time to consider your comments,
please ensure that we receive them on or before September 28, 2009. We
must receive requests for public hearings, in writing, at the address
shown in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by September 11,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments and materials concerning this
proposal by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments to
Docket No. FWS-R1-ES-2009-0046.
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing,
Attn: Docket No. FWS-R1-ES-2009-0046; Division of Policy and Directives
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any personal information you provide
us (see the Public Comments section below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Henson, State Supervisor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, 2600 SE
98th Avenue, Suite 100, Portland, OR 97266 (telephone 503-231-6179;
facsimile 503-231-6195). If you use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-
877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
We intend that any final action resulting from this proposal will
be as accurate and as effective as possible. Therefore, comments or
suggestions from the public, other concerned governmental agencies, the
scientific community, industry, or any other interested party
concerning this proposed rule are hereby solicited. We particularly
seek comments concerning:
(1) The reasons why we should or should not designate areas as
``critical habitat'' under section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), including whether there are threats to Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii from human activity, the degree of
which can be expected to increase due to the designation, and whether
the benefit of designation would outweigh threats to the species caused
by the designation, such that the designation of critical habitat is
prudent.
(2) Specific information on:
The amount and distribution of habitat for the species
included in this proposed rule;
What areas occupied at the time of listing, and that
contain physical and biological features essential for the conservation
of the species, we should include and why;
What areas not occupied at the time of listing that are
essential to the conservation of the species we should include and why;
and
Special management considerations or protection that the
proposed critical habitat may require.
(3) Specific information on Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii and the habitat components (physical and biological
features) essential to the conservation of these species, such as soil
moisture gradient, microsite preferences, and light requirements.
(4) Any information on the biological or ecological requirements of
these species.
(5) Land-use designations and current or planned activities in
areas occupied by the species, and their possible impacts on the
species and the proposed critical habitat.
(6) Any foreseeable economic, national security, or other potential
impacts resulting from the proposed designation and, in particular, any
impacts on small entities and the benefits of including or excluding
areas that are subject to these impacts.
(7) Whether the benefits of excluding any particular area from
critical habitat outweigh the benefits of including that area as
critical habitat under section 4(b)(2) of the Act, after considering
the potential impacts and benefits of the proposed critical habitat
designation.
(8) Whether our approach to designating critical habitat could be
improved or modified in any way to provide for greater public
participation and understanding, or to assist us in accommodating
public concerns and comments.
You may submit your comments and materials concerning this proposed
rule by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. If you
submit a comment via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire comment--
including any personal identifying information--will be posted on the
website. If you submit a hardcopy comment that includes personal
identifying information, you may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from public review. However, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will post all
hardcopy comments on https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we used in preparing this proposed rule, will be
available for public inspection at https://www.regulations.gov, or by
appointment, during normal business hours, at the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
You may obtain copies of the proposed rule by mail from the Oregon
Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) or by
visiting the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Background
Species Information
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii were
listed as endangered species under the Act in 2002 (67 FR 68004;
November 7, 2002). In this proposed rule, we intend to discuss only
those topics directly relevant to the designation of critical habitat
for these two species. For detailed information on the taxonomy and
biology of L. f. ssp. grandiflora and L. cookii, please refer to the
final listing rule published in the Federal Register
[[Page 37315]]
on November 7, 2002 (67 FR 68004) and the Draft Recovery Plan for
Listed Species of the Rogue Valley Vernal Pool and Illinois Valley Wet
Meadow Ecosystems (USFWS 2006, pp. II-1 to II-17).
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii are
endemic to seasonal wetland habitats of southwestern Oregon. L. F. ssp.
grandiflora is restricted to Jackson County in the Rogue River Valley,
where it co-occurs with Lomatium cookii in several areas near White
City in an area known as the Agate Desert (ONHP 1997, p. 3; Huddleston
2001, p. 11). Lomatium cookii occurs in two disjunct locations: (1) in
the Rogue River Valley, near the towns of Medford, White City, and
Eagle Point; and (2) in the Illinois River Valley of Josephine County
near the towns of Selma, Cave Junction, and O'Brien (ONHDB 1994, p. 5).
The two locations are separated by approximately 48 kilometers (km) (30
miles (mi)).
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora, commonly known as large-
flowered woolly meadowfoam, is a small, annual forb (broad-leaved herb)
in the false mermaid family (Limnanthaceae). The subspecies produces
yellowish-white flowers that bloom in April and May and reaches a
height of 15 centimeters (cm) (6 inches (in)) (Meinke 1982, p. 202). L.
f. ssp. grandiflora is distinguished from the more common L. f. ssp.
floccosa (common woolly meadowfoam) by its larger, sparser-haired
calyxes (outer flower bracts), which typically produce a single flower
per pedicel (flower stalk) (Kalin-Arroyo 1973, p. 188; USFWS 2006, pp.
II-1-II-3). In contrast, L. f. ssp. floccosa typically produces smaller
flowers with densely whitish and woolly haired calyxes; the flowers are
formed in clusters. L. f. ssp. grandiflora occurs on the floor of the
Middle Rogue River Basin in Jackson County in vernal pool-mounded
prairie habitat (rain-fed seasonal wetlands in prairie characterized by
gentle mound-swale topography) (Kalin-Arroyo 1973, p. 188; ONHP 1997,
p. 4; USFWS 2006, pp. II-1-II-3).
Lomatium cookii, commonly known as Cook's lomatium or Cook's desert
parsley, is a perennial, tap-rooted forb in the parsley family
(Apiaceae) that produces light-yellow flowers from late March to May
and reaches a height of 50 cm (20 in). This species is distinguished
from the more common Lomatium utriculatum (foothill desert parsley) by
having narrow bracts under the flower umbels (flower clusters),
producing paler yellow flowers, and by typically lacking leaves on the
flowering stems (Kagan 1986, pp. 73-74; USFWS 2006, pp. II-15-II-17).
Lomatium cookii is associated with vernal pool-mounded prairie habitat,
but also occurs in seasonally wet meadow habitat in forest openings
(ONHDB 1994, pp. 9-10).
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii are both
associated with the remaining relatively undisturbed vernal pool-
mounded prairie habitat in the Middle Rogue River Basin's Agate Desert
(Environmental Science Associates (ESA) 2007, p. 2-1; ONHP 1997, p. 3).
Relative to the pools, the plants often occur in pool margins, or less
often on both mound tops and depression bottoms of less intact vernal
pools.
The substrate underlying the vernal pool topography in the Middle
Rogue River Valley is primarily basalt within a matrix of thick clay
soil, which creates a hardpan or duripan layer (mineral soil horizons
relatively impervious to water). During fall and winter rains, water
collects in shallow depressions of the vernal pool-mounded prairie
habitat. Downward percolation of water is prevented by the presence of
the duripan layer located from 0.18 to 0.75 meters (m) (0.6 to 2.5 feet
(ft)) below the soil surface (Keeley and Zedler 1998, p. 2; Huddleston
2001, pp. 14-15). In areas north and northwest of Medford, the vicinity
of White City, and north along low-elevation plains, L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii occur on alluvial soils, primarily
mapped as Agate-Winlo complex soils, but also occasionally on mapped
Coker clay and Provig-Agate complex soils with 0 to 3 percent slopes.
L. f. ssp. grandiflora also occasionally occurs on soils mapped as
Carney clay and Winlo very gravelly loam in vernal pool habitat north
of White City (USDA 2006b).
In the Agate Desert, the two plants are associated with
microhabitats occupied by mostly annual native forbs and graminoids
(grass-like plants), including Alopecurus geniculatus (water foxtail),
Deschampsia danthonioides (slender hairgrass), Eryngium petiolatum
(Oregon coyote thistle), Trifolium depauperatum (poverty clover),
Myosurus minimus (tiny mouse-tail), Navarretia leucocephala ssp.
leucocephala (white-head navarretia), Lasthenia californica (California
goldfields), Phlox gracilis (slender phlox), Plagiobothrys bracteatus
(bracted popcornflower), and Triteleia hyacinthina (white brodiaea)
(OSU 2007); USFWS 2006, p. II-6). The vernal pool habitat occupied by
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora in the Agate Desert ranges from
372 to 469 m (1,220 to 1540 ft) in elevation (Huddleston 2001, p. 11;
USGS 2002). The vernal pool habitat occupied by Lomatium cookii in the
same basin area ranges from 372 to 411 m (1,220 to 1,350 ft) in
elevation (Huddleston 2001, p. 11; USGS 2009).
The habitats occupied by Lomatium cookii in the Illinois River
Valley are more complex than the Rogue River Valley in both soil
composition and soil depth. Lomatium cookii occurs on 17 mapped soil
types in the Illinois River Valley. The majority of Lomatium cookii
occurrences in the Illinois River Valley are found on Brockman clay
loam, Josephine gravelly loam, and Pollard loam (USDA 2008). Unlike the
Middle Rogue River Basin soils, many of the Lomatium cookii-occupied
soil types originate from stream-fed alluvium covering sedimentary or
ultramafic rocks (ONHDB 1994, pp. 9-10). Ultramafic rock is a class of
rock that is low in calcium and high in iron and magnesium and is often
toxic to plants (Brady et al. 2005, p. 246). Pollard loam and Speaker-
Josephine gravelly loam soils originate from non-ultramafic sources,
while Brockman soil and most others types originate from ultramafic
parent material (Silvernail and Meinke 2008, pp. 9-10).
Lomatium cookii plants exhibit a slightly different morphology in
the Illinois River Valley than in the Rogue River Basin. Compared with
Agate Desert plants, Illinois River Valley Lomatium cookii plants are
less robust, have smaller plant dimensions, and have fewer numbers of
floral units. Plants in the two areas also exhibit differences in
floral and fruit morphology, seed length, the number of umbels (flower
groups), length of peduncle (flower stalk), number of central umbellets
(sub-flower groups) per umbel, and number of staminate flowers (male
flowers) per peripheral and central umbellet (Silvernail and Meinke
2008, pp. 30-31).
In the Illinois River Valley, Lomatium cookii is known from six
general areas along a 29-km (18-mi) stretch of the Illinois River
within the large serpentine sheet composed of ultramafic rock that
covers the central and southwestern portion of Josephine County. Within
this landform, Lomatium cookii occurs only in areas with alluvial silts
or clays that have been deposited over the ultramafic bedrock (ONHDB
1994, p. 9). In the Illinois River Valley, Lomatium cookii occurs in
elevations that range from 383 to 488 m (1,256 to 1,600 ft) (USGS
2009).
Habitat occupied by Lomatium cookii in the Illinois Valley is
primarily seasonally wet grassland meadows, on flats and slopes in
mixed oak-conifer forested meadows, streambanks, or
[[Page 37316]]
forest openings, dominated by native grasses, including: Danthonia
californica (California oatgrass), Poa secunda (rough bluegrass),
Deschampsia cespitosa (tufted hairgrass), Festuca roemeri var.
klamathensis (Klamath Roemer's fescue), Achnatherum lemmonii (Lemmon's
needlegrass) and Deschampsia danthonioides. Native forbs include
Camassia spp. (camas), Ranunculus occidentalis (western buttercup), and
Limnanthes gracilis var. gracilis (slender meadowfoam) (ONHDB 1994, p.
9). The seasonally wet meadows occupied by Lomatium cookii in the
Illinois River Valley usually occur as part of bottomland Quercus
garryana-Quercus kelloggii-Pinus ponderosa (Oregon white oak-California
black oak-ponderosa pine) savannas. Widely spaced, large pine trees are
characteristic of the open meadow habitat with mixed pine and oak
woodlands occurring along seasonal creeks.
At the time of listing in 2002, Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora was known from 15 distinct occurrences and Lomatium cookii
was known from 36 occurrences throughout their ranges (67 FR 68004;
November 7, 2002). Currently L. f. ssp. grandiflora has 22 documented
occurrences and Lomatium cookii has 37 documented occurrences. L. f.
ssp. grandiflora is found only in Jackson County, and is known from
Shady Cove, Hammel Road, two areas northeast of Upper Table Rock,
several areas north of Eagle Point, the Agate Reservoir, and at several
vicinities in and around White City including: the Jackson County
Sports Park (Hoover Ponds), the Hall and Military Slough tracks of the
Denman Wildlife Area, on City of Medford property, several areas west
of Whetstone Creek, and on several private properties (OHNIC 2008;
Service database 2008). The four largest population centers of L. f.
ssp. grandiflora include two areas in White City, Whetstone Creek, and
an area northeast of Upper Table Rock. The smallest L. f. ssp.
grandiflora population is known from an area just outside the Rogue
Valley International-Medford Airport (Meyers 2008, p. 48).
Lomatium cookii occurs in both Jackson County and Josephine County.
In Josephine County, where it is found in seasonal wet meadow habitats,
Lomatium cookii has been reported from six general areas: (1) the
vicinity of Selma; (2) the east base of Woodcock Mountain; (3) Rough
and Ready Creek; (4) Illinois River Forks State Park; (5) French Flat;
and (6) Laurel Road (ONHIC 2008; USFWS 2008). The six largest
population centers of Lomatium cookii include two areas in French Flat,
Laurel Road, and near the east base of Woodcock Mountain in Josephine
County; and at the Rogue Valley International-Medford Airport and an
area in east White City in Jackson County.
The two species co-occur in three general areas in Jackson County:
(1) the vicinity of the Rogue International-Medford Airport in Medford;
(2) in and around White City; and (3) areas west of Whetstone Creek.
Specific locations where Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and
Lomatium cookii are found together have been reported in the Rogue
River Valley at the Rogue Valley International-Medford Airport and
various locations in and around White City including: the Jackson
County Sports Park, the Hall Track of the Denman Wildlife Area, on City
of Medford property, several areas west of Whetstone Creek, and on
several private properties in and around White City (ONHIC 2008; USFWS
2008).
Lomatium cookii populations are generally found in habitats not
subject to mining, agricultural development, residential or commercial
development, and grazing (Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center
(ONHIC) database 2008). Although, historically, many of these
activities were thought to have negative impacts on the species, there
are some notable exceptions, such as grazing, which can be beneficial
if properly managed. At a few sites in Jackson County, for example,
annual mowing, periodic burning, and grazing are practiced and appear
to be compatible with survival and even proliferation of Lomatium
cookii (Borgias 2004, p. 34). In fact, the largest and most prolific
Lomatium cookii populations occur where compatible grazing or mowing
practices occur repeatedly (Borgias 2004, p. 34). Although intensive
cattle grazing has a significant negative impact, especially combined
with the effects of competition with nonnative annual grasses, evidence
suggests that Lomatium cookii is capable of persisting under moderate
grazing pressure (Brock 1987, pp. 23, 30). Timing of grazing is also
important, as grazing in the fall and winter growing season would
reduce seed production by the plants (Brock 1987, p. 23). Sites
occupied by Lomatium cookii that receive no management continue to
support plant populations, but monitoring suggests that some of those
populations are declining (Kaye and Thorpe 2008, pp. 16-25). Borgias
(2004, p. 34) observed that, after several years without grazing or a
fire at The Nature Conservancy's Agate Desert Preserve, thatch
accumulated and recruitment of young Lomatium cookii declined due to
the increases of nonnative annual grasses. Other reports indicate that
vegetative succession, herbivory by voles (Microtus spp.), or both, may
be the cause of declining populations (Kaye and Thorpe 2008, pp. 16-
25).
Land uses associated with the largest, more intact populations of
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii are vernal
pool habitats managed using compatible agricultural practices. Actions
conducive to large population sizes of either of the two species may
include prescribed burns, controlled grazing practices, or regular
mowing. The Rogue Valley International-Medford Airport is an example of
an area that is mowed regularly to meet Federal Aviation Authority
(FAA) safety requirements and that supports a large and prolific
Lomatium cookii population that extends over 28 ha (70 ac) (R. Russell,
pers. comm. 2004; S. Friedman, pers. obs. 2009). Within grazed
properties, small isolated patches of L. f. ssp. grandiflora often
continue to persist, perhaps due to suppression of invasive nonnative
grasses (Meyers 2008, pp. 1-48; Wildlands, Inc. 2008, p. 1; Borgias
2004, p. 42).
Threats
Threats to Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii
in the Rogue River Valley include: residential, urban, and commercial
development; agricultural development (including leveling, ditching,
tilling, and stock pond construction or water impoundments); road
construction and maintenance; aggregate mining; incompatible grazing
practices; off-road vehicle (ORV) use that affects surface hydrology;
vandalism (related to ORV use); encroachment by nonnative plants; and
herbivory by gophers (family Geomyidae) and voles (67 FR 68004; Kaye
and Thorpe, pp. 11-12).
Residential, urban, agricultural, mining, and commercial
development has resulted in an approximately 60 percent loss of the
vernal pool landscape in the Rogue River Valley due to building
construction, removal of habitat, altered hydrology, or altered
topography (ONHP 1997, pp. 14-15; Wille and Petersen 2006, p. 1993).
Ground-disturbing activities, such as road construction
and maintenance or ORV use, can damage the clay pan layer and allow
soil moisture to drain from the vernal pools or wet meadow habitats
that the plants depend upon for reproduction and survival. Incompatible
agricultural practices, including some timber management and crop
management, can alter hydrology,
[[Page 37317]]
directly affect plants with equipment, or indirectly affect plants as a
result of road construction. Road construction can result in population
fragmentation, alteration of hydrology, or the covering of plants by
fill material, resulting in degradation of habitat and direct loss of
plants.
Vandalism refers to the intentional disregard or
dismantling of signing or fencing intended to protect certain wetland
areas from unauthorized ORV use, which may then result in negative
effects on the hydrology of the habitat.
The removal of surface material in conjunction with mining
activities results in the direct loss of habitats.
Heavy grazing, especially from October through April,
would be an example of incompatible grazing. The majority of seasonal
growth for these two plants occurs during the winter, and if plants are
grazed during the fall and winter months, they are less likely to
produce seed in the spring or early summer (Brock 1987, p. 23). Vernal
pool hydrology may also be altered by the compression and compaction
disturbance caused by grazing livestock. Nonnative plants can
outcompete and displace native plant species and may also inhibit
successful germination of seeds. Herbivory by gophers and voles results
in direct mortality of individual plants, as well as an indirect
decrease in reproduction.
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii are also
threatened by encroachment of nonnative annual herbs, including
Centaurea solstitialis (yellow starthistle) and Cardaria draba (hoary
cress), which may competitively exclude the two native species, as well
as nonnative annual grasses, namely Hordeum marinum ssp. gussoneanum
(Mediterranean barley) and Taeniantherum caput-medusae (medusahead).
Hordeum marinum ssp. gussoneanum encroaches on microhabitats occupied
by both species, but T. caput-medusae occurs on adjacent upland mound
habitats, occasionally interfering with Lomatium cookii germination and
growth, or stifling native plant growth in general. Reproduction of
both Lomatium cookii and L. f. spp. grandiflora is impaired by the
presence of introduced annual grasses, as seeds of both native species
are not able to germinate under the dense thatch produced by nonnative
annual grasses. Recently introduced nonnative invasive plants that are
particularly threatening to Lomatium cookii in the Illinois Valley are
Alyssum murale (yellowtuft) and A. corsicum (alisso di Corsica). These
two plants were recently introduced to serpentine meadow habitat as
part of an experiment to test their ability to accumulate nickel.
Unfortunately the plants have now begun to spread rapidly across wide
areas of serpentine meadow in particularly dense concentrations and
threaten to encroach upon and displace Lomatium cookii populations in
the Illinois Valley (ODA and USFS 2008, pp. 1-3).
Threats to Lomatium cookii in the Illinois Valley include aggregate
and mineral mining, residential and urban development, impacts
associated with timber harvesting practices, road construction and
maintenance, ground disturbance by ORV use that affects surface
hydrology, garbage dumping, succession of native woody vegetation due
to fire suppression, incompatible grazing practices, and herbivory by
gophers and voles; the effects of most of these threats are described
above. The dumping of garbage, especially such large items as old
appliances, can directly affect populations by crushing or smothering
them. Succession of native woody vegetation, although a natural
process, is normally held in check by fire. In the Illinois Valley, the
longer fire return intervals due to fire suppression has led to the
encroachment of native woody vegetation (trees and shrubs) into the wet
meadow habitats occupied by Lomatium cookii. Such native woody plants
include: Ceanothus cuneatus (buckbrush), Pinus ponderosa (Ponderosa
pine), Pinus jeffreyi (Jeffrey pine), Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-
fir), and Toxicodendron diversiloba (poison oak). The succession of
these species in Lomatium cookii habitat can isolate the species into
small refuge pockets or cause widespread reduction of habitat
suitability by reducing light availability (over-shading), limiting
water and nutrient availability, fragmenting populations, and limiting
space to grow. Individuals of Lomatium cookii growing in more shaded
conditions, as when surrounded by shrubs, tend to be smaller and less
robust than plants growing in more open areas in association with lower
growing grasses and forbs (ONHIC 2008).
Several long-term monitoring efforts indicate that, at four
protected locations in the Rogue and Illinois River Valleys, Lomatium
cookii populations have experienced declines (D. Borgias, pers. comm.
2006; Kaye and Thorpe 2008, pp. 16-25). The causes are not specifically
known but appear to be due to encroachment and over-shading from the
succession of natural vegetation or increases in gopher and vole
activity. At two of the declining Lomatium cookii populations, located
at the French Flat Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC), the
Medford District of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is currently
planning to arrest this decline by reducing shrub and tree encroachment
(S. Fritts, pers. comm. 2009). At two Lomatium cookii populations
located on The Nature Conservancy's Agate Desert Preserve and Whetstone
Savanna Preserve, planting of native bunchgrass, mowing, and grazing
are being considered to address declining plant numbers (D. Borgias,
pers. comm. 2009).
Previous Federal Actions
For more information on Federal actions concerning Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii prior to their listing,
please refer to the final listing rule for the two plants published in
the Federal Register on November 7, 2002 (67 FR 68004). At the time of
listing, critical habitat was not designated for the two species due to
higher priorities at that time.
On December 19, 2007, the Center for Biological Diversity filed a
complaint against the Service (Center for Biological Diversity v.
Kempthorne, et al., 07-CV-2378 IEG, (S.D. CA)) for failure to designate
critical habitat for four plant species, including Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii (the other two species occur in
different regions). In a settlement agreement reached on April 11,
2008, we agreed to complete a critical habitat determination for L. f.
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii in a single rulemaking because
they share similar habitats. We agreed to submit a proposed critical
habitat rule for both L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii to the
Federal Register by July 15, 2009, and a final rule by July 15, 2010.
In 2003, critical habitat was designated for the threatened vernal
pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) in California and the Rogue
River Valley of Oregon (68 FR 46683; August 6, 2003). The designated
vernal pool fairy shrimp critical habitat in Oregon overlaps with
approximately 2,101 ha (5,192 ac) of suitable habitat for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and 799 ha (1,974 ac) of suitable habitat for
Lomatium cookii (68 FR 46683). The vernal pool fairy shrimp critical
habitat designation resulted in additional regulatory review for
habitats occupied by both L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii in
most of Jackson County due to the similarity and location of the vernal
pool-mounded prairie habitat shared by these species. In this proposed
rule, we will note where designated critical habitat for the
[[Page 37318]]
vernal pool fairy shrimp overlaps with that proposed for L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii.
Prudency Determination
Section 4(a)(3) of the Act, as amended, and implementing
regulations (50 CFR 424.12) require that, to the maximum extent prudent
and determinable, we designate critical habitat at the time the species
is determined to be endangered or threatened. Our regulations (50 CFR
424.12(a)) further state that the designation of critical habitat is
not prudent when one or both of the following situations exist--(1) The
species is threatened by taking or other human activity, and
identification of critical habitat can be expected to increase the
degree of threat to the species, or (2) such designation of critical
habitat would not be beneficial to the species.
There is no documentation that Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
or Lomatium cookii are threatened by taking or targeted human
activities such as collection. Since the publication of the Draft
Recovery Plan for Listed Species of the Rogue Valley Vernal Pool and
Illinois Valley Wet Meadow Ecosystems (draft recovery plan) (USFWS
2006, pp. IV-13-IV-14) in 2006, maps identifying core recovery areas
for L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii have been available to
the public. The core recovery areas included focal areas where we
anticipated conservation and protection could result in recovery of the
two species. Most landowners and collectors have been aware of the
location of general L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii
occurrence locations since publication of the draft recovery plan in
2006. We do not have any documentation that threats have increased
since these species were listed and since the draft recovery plan was
published.
In the absence of evidence that the designation of critical habitat
would increase threats to a species, if there are any benefits to a
critical habitat designation, then a prudent finding is warranted. The
potential benefits of a critical habitat designation include: (1)
Federal agency compliance with the consultation requirements to avoid
destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat; (2) focusing
conservation activities on the most essential features and areas; (3)
providing educational benefits to State or county governments or
private entities; and (4) preventing people from causing inadvertent
harm to the species. The primary regulatory effect of critical habitat
is the requirement under section 7(a)(2) of the Act that Federal
agencies refrain from taking any action that destroys or adversely
affects critical habitat. The proposed critical habitat for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii is composed of lands
under Federal, State, county, municipal, and private ownership. Some of
the lands designated as critical habitat may be subject to Federal
actions that trigger the section 7 consultation requirement, such as
the granting of Federal monies for conservation projects or the need
for Federal permits for projects (for example, the filling of wetlands
subject to section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344, et
seq.)). There may also be some educational or informational benefits to
the designation of critical habitat. Educational benefits include the
notification of landowners, land managers, and the general public of
the importance of protecting the habitat of these species. In the case
of L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii, these aspects of
critical habitat designation would potentially benefit the conservation
of these species.
Although these species are limited in their ecological and
geographical ranges, we have no information indicating that a critical
habitat designation would not be prudent due to the threat of
overcollection or vandalism. Therefore, since we have determined that
the designation of critical habitat will not likely increase the degree
of threat to these species and may provide some measure of benefit, we
find that designation of critical habitat is prudent for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii: thus, we are proposing
to designate critical habitat in accordance with section 4(b)(2) of the
Act.
Critical Habitat
Critical habitat is defined in section 3 of the Act as:
1. The specific areas within the geographical area occupied by a
species, at the time it is listed in accordance with the Act, on which
are found those physical or biological features
(a) Essential to the conservation of the species, and
(b) Which may require special management considerations or
protection; and
2. Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by a
species at the time it is listed, upon a determination that such areas
are essential for the conservation of the species.
Conservation, as defined under section 3 of the Act, means to use
and the use of all methods and procedures that are necessary to bring
any endangered species or threatened species to the point at which the
measures provided pursuant to the Act are no longer necessary.
Critical habitat receives protection under section 7 of the Act
through the prohibition against destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat with regard to discretionary actions carried out,
funded, or authorized by a Federal agency. Section 7 requires
consultation on discretionary Federal actions that may affect critical
habitat. The designation of critical habitat does not affect land
ownership or establish a refuge, wilderness, reserve, preserve, or
other conservation area. Such designation does not allow government or
public access to private lands.
To be included in a critical habitat designation, the habitat
within the geographic area occupied by the species at the time it was
listed must first have the physical and biological features that are
essential to the conservation of the species. Critical habitat
designations identify, to the extent known using the best scientific
data available, habitat areas that provide essential life-cycle needs
of the species (i.e., areas on which are found the primary constituent
elements, as defined at 50 CFR 424.12(b)). Occupied habitat that
contains features essential to the conservation of the species meets
the definition of critical habitat only if those features may require
special management considerations or protection. Under the Act, we can
designate areas that were unoccupied at the time of listing only when
we determine that the best available scientific data demonstrate that
the designation of the area is essential to the conservation of the
species. When the best available scientific data do not demonstrate
that the conservation needs of the species require such additional
areas, we will not designate critical habitat in areas outside the
geographical area occupied by the species at the time of listing. An
area currently occupied by the species but not occupied at the time of
listing may, however, be determined to be essential to the conservation
of the species and may be included in the critical habitat designation.
Section 4 of the Act requires that we designate critical habitat on
the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available.
Further, our ``Policy on Information Standards Under the Endangered
Species Act,'' published in the Federal Register on July 1, 1994 (59 FR
34271), and Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (P.L. 106-554; H.R. 5658) and
the
[[Page 37319]]
associated Information Quality Guidelines issued by the Service,
provide criteria, establish procedures, and provide guidance to ensure
that decisions made by the Service make use of the best scientific and
commercial data available.
When we are determining which areas should be proposed as critical
habitat, a primary source of information is generally the information
developed during the listing process for the species. Additional
information sources may include the recovery plan for the species,
articles in peer-reviewed journals, conservation plans developed by
States and counties, scientific status surveys and studies, biological
assessments, or other unpublished materials and expert opinion or
personal knowledge.
We recognize that designation of critical habitat may not include
all of the habitat areas that may eventually be determined to be
necessary for the recovery of the species, based on the scientific data
currently before the Service, as new information may become available
that indicates otherwise. In addition, habitat is often dynamic, and
species may shift from one area to another over time. For these
reasons, a critical habitat designation should not be interpreted as
meaning that habitat outside the designation is unimportant or may not
be required for the recovery of the species in question.
Areas that support populations, but are outside the critical
habitat designation, will continue to be subject to conservation
actions implemented under section 7(a)(1) of the Act and to the
regulatory protections afforded by the section 7(a)(2) jeopardy
prohibition, as determined on the basis of the best available
information at the time of the action. Federally funded or permitted
projects affecting listed species outside their designated critical
habitat areas may still result in jeopardy findings under certain
circumstances.
Methods
As required by section 4(b)(2)of the Act, we used the best
scientific data available in determining areas occupied at the time of
listing that contain the features essential to the conservation of
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii, considered
individually. We also determined whether those features may require
special management considerations or protection. We reviewed available
information that pertains to the habitat requirements of these species;
these sources of information included, but were not limited to, the
proposed (65 FR 30941; May 15, 2000) and final (67 FR 68004; November
7, 2002) rules to list these species; the draft recovery plan (USFWS
2006); data contained in reports prepared for or by the U.S. Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) (1999 through 2008), the Oregon Department of
Agriculture's (ODA) Native Plant Conservation Program (2007-2008), and
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) (1998 through 2008); discussions with
species experts including ODA, BLM, ONHIC, and TNC staff; data and
information presented in academic research theses; data provided by
ONHIC; Oregon State University herbarium records; and data submitted
during section 7 consultations. Additionally, we utilized regional
Geographic Information System (GIS) shape files for area calculations
and mapping, such as United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
National Agriculture Imagery Program aerial imagery, USDA soil maps,
and United States Geological Survey (USGS) contour maps (USDA 2006a,
2006b, 2008; USGS 2002, 2009). We are not currently proposing as
critical habitat any areas outside the geographical area presently
occupied by either L. f. ssp. grandiflora or Lomatium cookii, because
the draft recovery plan indicates that recovery can be attained within
the present range of each species (USFWS 2006). Our regulations
stipulate that critical habitat shall be designated outside the areas
presently occupied by a species only when a designation limited to its
present range would be inadequate to ensure the conservation of the
species (50 CFR 424.12(e)).
Primary Constituent Elements
In accordance with section 3(5)(A)(i) of the Act and regulations at
50 CFR 424.12(b), in determining which areas occupied at the time of
listing to propose as critical habitat, we consider the physical and
biological features essential to the conservation of the species and
whether those features may require special management considerations or
protection. These features may include, but are not limited to, the
following:
(1) Space for individual and population growth, and for normal
behavior;
(2) Food, water, air, light, minerals, or other nutritional or
physiological requirements;
(3) Cover or shelter;
(4) Sites for breeding, reproduction, rearing (or development) of
offspring, germination, or seed dispersal; and generally
(5) Habitats that are protected from disturbance or are
representative of the historical geographical and ecological
distributions of a species.
The appropriate quantity and spatial arrangement of the principal
biological or physical features within the defined area essential to
the conservation of the species comprise the ``primary constituent
elements'' (PCEs) of critical habitat. As defined by our implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 424.12(b)), these primary constituent elements
may include, but are not limited to, features such as roost sites,
nesting grounds, spawning sites, feeding sites, seasonal wetlands or
drylands, water quality and quantity, host species or plant
pollinators, geological formations, vegetation types, tides, and
specific soil types.
The specific PCEs required for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii are derived from the biological needs of the
species as described in the Background section of this proposed rule
and the information presented below.
Space for Individual and Population Growth, Germination, and Seed
Dispersal
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii both occur
on vernal pool-mounded prairie and other ephemeral wetland habitats
underlain by relatively undisturbed subsoils subject to periodic
inundation (Borgias 2004, pp. 17-20; ONHDB 1994, pp. 9-10). In the
Agate Desert, both species occur in low-gradient mounded habitat that
supports a mosaic of low-growing native grasses and forbs and an
absence of dense canopy vegetation. The pools typically fill during the
winter rains and retain a wetted perimeter until late April. In years
with higher than average winter rainfall, more depressions fill, and
individual pools that are separate in dry years may merge together
(Borgias 2004, p. 32). The dominant native grasses and forbs associated
with vernal pool-mounded prairie habitat occupied by L. f. ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii include: Alopecurus geniculatus,
Deschampsia danthonioides, Eryngium petiolatum, Lasthenia californica,
Myosurus minimus, Navarretia leucocephala ssp. leucocephala, Phlox
gracilis, Plagiobothrys bracteatus, Trifolium depauperatum, and
Triteleia hyacinthina. In the Agate Desert, vernal pool-mounded prairie
habitats occupied by Lomatium cookii, range from 372 to 411 m (1,220 to
1,350 ft) in elevation. In the same habitat, L. f. ssp. grandiflora
occurrences range from 372 to 469 m (1,220 to 1,540 ft) in elevation
(USGS 2002).
In the Illinois River Valley, Lomatium cookii occurs primarily in
alluvial
[[Page 37320]]
meadows underlain by relatively undisturbed ultramafic soils subject to
winter inundation from rainfall, seasonal flooding, and overland
drainage (ONHDB 1994, pp. 9-10). These seasonally wet meadows,
occurring within Quercus garryana-Quercus kelloggii-Pinus ponderosa
forest openings, are dominated by native grasses and forbs including:
Achnatherum lemmonii, Camassia spp., Danthonia californica, Deschampsia
cespitosa, Festuca roemeri, Poa secunda, Ranunculus occidentalis, and
Limnanthes gracilis var. gracilis (ONHDB 1994, p. 9). Widely spaced,
large pine trees are characteristic of the open meadow habitat with
some mixed pine and oak woodlands occurring along seasonal creeks. In
the Illinois River Valley area, Lomatium cookii ranges from 383 to 488
m (1,256 to 1,600 ft) in elevation (USGS 2009).
These specific habitats and hydrological regimes provide the
conditions essential for the growth and survival of Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii and for the successful production,
germination, and dispersal of seeds.
Slope
In the Agate Desert, Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and
Lomatium cookii occur almost exclusively on low-gradient and flat
terrains, not typically exceeding 3 percent slope (USDA 2006b). In the
Agate Desert, L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii occur
predominately in Agate-Winlo complex soils mapped at 0 to 3 percent
slope.
Most Illinois River Valley Lomatium cookii occurrences are found on
a variety of soils that range from 0 to 8 percent slope (ONHIC 2008;
USDA 2008). However, a few of the Lomatium cookii sites in the Illinois
River Valley are on terrains with soils mapped up to 30 percent slope
(ONHIC 2008).
Water and Nutritional or Physiological Requirements
Vernal pools typically become inundated or saturated during winter
rains and hold water for sufficient lengths of time for Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii to germinate, grow, and
reproduce. Periodically, this geographic area may experience drought,
and rainfall may be insufficient to fill pools. The composition of the
plant community can vary from year to year depending on the timing and
amount of annual rainfall and the type of land management on the site
(Borgias 2004, p. 16). The vernal pools and wet meadow soils where the
two plants occur are dry during the summer but become saturated with
water nearly every year. The water regime is important for the
sustenance of the two plants and for their ability to germinate,
persist, and grow in wet conditions during the winter months.
Vernal pool habitats, ephemeral swales, seasonally wet meadows, and
streamside habitats occupied by Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii in the Rogue River and Illinois River valleys can
be characterized as seasonal wetlands. The habitats are dominated by
mostly obligate or facultative wetland vegetation. The Lomatium cookii
occurrences at Rough and Ready Creek, the Rogue Valley International-
Medford Airport, and a potentially introduced population at Woodcock
Creek are clearly not wetlands but appear to have high clay content in
the soil (Kagan 1994, p. 10; Silvernail and Meinke 2008, p. 31). The
meadows at these sites may have enough of a clay component so that they
would be seasonally wet (ONHDB 1994, p. 10).
The moisture and other nutritional or physiological requirements
afforded by these sites provide the essential requirements for the
growth, germination, reproduction, and successful seed dispersal of
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii.
Soil
For Lomatium cookii, which occurs in both the Agate Desert and the
Illinois River Valley, the habitat soil types between the two plant
population centers are vastly different in a variety of chemical and
physical characteristics. In particular, the soil types in the Agate
Desert typically occupied by both Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii are Agate-Winlo or Provig-Agate soils. Soils in the
Illinois River Valley occupied by Lomatium cookii may be Abegg gravelly
loam, Brockman clay loam, Copsey clay, Cornutt-Dubakel complex, Dumps,
Eightlar extremely stony clay, Evans loam, Foehlin gravelly loam,
Josephine gravelly loam, Kerby loam, Newberg fine sandy loam, Pearsoll-
Rock outcrop complex, Pollard loam, Riverwash, Speaker-Josephine
gravelly loam, Takilma cobbly loam, or Takilma Variant extremely cobbly
loam. The majority of Lomatium cookii occurrences in the Illinois River
Valley are found on Brockman clay loam, Josephine gravelly loam and
Pollard loam (USDA 2008). In a soil analysis conduced by Silvernail and
Meinke (2008, p. 30), samples from ultramafic Lomatium cookii habitat
in the Illinois River Valley had higher concentrations of magnesium,
nickel, chromium, cobalt, zinc, and copper and higher percent magnesium
saturation. Soils from Lomatium cookii habitat in the Rogue River
Valley had higher concentrations of calcium, nitrogen, phosphorus,
potassium, manganese, iron, and boron. Soils from the two population
centers had similar pH, cation exchange capacity, and percent sand,
silt, or clay content (Silvernail and Meinke 2008, p. 30).
Habitats Protected from Disturbance
Development
Disturbance in the form of development is a major factor in the
loss or degradation of habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii. Residential or commercial development can directly
eliminate or fragment essential habitat for both of the two species,
causing declines in distribution and numbers. Agricultural development,
such as ripping (a form of deep tilling that potentially undermines the
hardpan layer of the soil), water diversion, and water impoundment can
also eliminate habitat for the two plant species. Development can
indirectly cause increases in nonnative plants in the habitat, in turn
decreasing pollinators, habitat for pollinator species, and seed
production of many native vernal pool plants (Thorp and Leong 1998, pp.
169-179). L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii face immediate
threats from urban and commercial development in the rapidly expanding
Medford and White City metropolitan areas in the Rogue River Valley.
Protected habitat is therefore of crucial importance for the growth and
dispersal of these two species.
Based on aerial imagery, habitat areas that appear to provide
sufficient buffer protection and continuous non-fragmented Limnanthes
floccosa ssp. grandiflora habitat were typically greater than 8 ha (20
ac). Habitat areas of this size provide protection from adjacent
development and weed sources and contained intact hydrology (USDA
2006a). This is the size of the smallest vernal pool-mounded prairie
area that is known to support L. f. ssp. grandiflora (ONHIC 2008).
Based on aerial imagery and ONHIC information, habitat areas that
appeared to provide a sufficient buffer protection and continuous non-
fragmented Lomatium cookii habitat covered at least 12 ha (30 ac).
Habitat areas of this minimum size provide protection from adjacent
development and weed sources and contained intact hydrology. The 12-ha
(30-ac) habitat area is equivalent to the smallest wet meadow area in
the Illinois River Valley
[[Page 37321]]
that supports Lomatium cookii (USDA 2006a, ONHIC 2008).
Invasive Nonnative Plants
Invasive nonnative species may outcompete Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii for open, bare ground and reduce space
available for the listed plants' growth (Borgias 2004, p. 45);
therefore, the listed plants require microhabitats free of exotic or
native invasive competitors. In the Agate Desert, invasive nonnative
plants that compete with the two listed species include: Centaurea
solstitialis, Cardaria draba, Hordeum marinum ssp. gussoneanum, and
Taeniantherum caput-medusae (medusahead).
In the Illinois Valley, common introduced grasses in the grazed
pastures in and around Lomatium cookii habitat include: Festuca
arundinacea (tall fescue), Dactylis glomerata (orchard grass), and Poa
pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass). In addition, the recently introduced
nonnative invasive species Alyssum murale and A. corsicum threaten
Lomatium cookii in this area.
Primary Constituent Elements for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
and Lomatium cookii
Under our regulations, we are required to identify the known
physical and biological features or PCEs essential to the conservation
of Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii, which may
require special management considerations or protection. All areas
proposed as critical habitat for L. f. ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium
cookii were occupied at the time of listing, are within the species'
historical geographic range, and provide sufficient PCEs to support at
least one life-history function.
Based on our current knowledge of the life history, biology, and
ecology of the species and the characteristics of the habitat necessary
to sustain the essential life history functions of the species, we have
determined that the PCEs for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora
critical habitat are:
(1) Vernal pools or ephemeral wetlands and the adjacent upland
margins of these depressions that hold water for a sufficient length of
time to sustain Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora germination,
growth, and reproduction, occurring in the Agate Desert vernal pool
landscape (ONHP 1997, p. 3). These vernal pools or ephemeral wetlands
are seasonally inundated during wet years but do not necessarily fill
with water every year due to natural variability in rainfall, and
support native plant populations. Areas of sufficient size and quality
are likely to have the following characteristics:
Elevations from 372 to 469 m (1,220 to 1,540 ft);
Associated dominant native plants including, not limited
to: Alopecurus geniculatus, Deschampsia danthonioides, Eryngium
petiolatum, Lasthenia californica, Myosurus minimus, Navarretia
leucocephala ssp. leucocephala, Phlox gracilis, Plagiobothrys
bracteatus, Trifolium depauperatum, and Triteleia hyacinthina.
A minimum area of 8 ha (20 ac) to provide intact hydrology
and protection from development and weed sources.
(2) The hydrologically and ecologically functional system of
interconnected pools, ephemeral wetlands, or depressions within a
matrix of surrounding uplands that together form vernal pool complexes
within the greater watershed. The associated features may include the
pool basin or depressions; an intact hardpan subsoil underlying the
surface soils up to 0.75 m (2.5 ft) in depth; and surrounding uplands,
including mound topography and other geographic and edaphic features,
that support these systems of hydrologically interconnected pools and
other ephemeral wetlands (which may vary in extent depending on site-
specific characteristics of pool size and depth, soil type, and hardpan
depth).
(3) Silt, loam, and clay soils that are of alluvial origin, with a
0 to 3 percent slope, primarily classified as Agate-Winlo complex
soils, but also including Coker clay, Carney clay, Provig-Agate complex
soils, and Winlo very gravelly loam soils.
(4) No or negligible presence of competitive nonnative invasive
plant species. Negligible is defined for the purpose of this rulemaking
as a minimal level of nonnative plant species that will still allow
Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora to continue to survive and
recover.
The need for space for individual and population growth,
germination, seed dispersal, and reproduction is provided by PCEs 1 and
4; the need for soil moisture for growth, germination, reproduction,
and seed dispersal is provided by PCE 2 (but not necessarily every
year); the need for other nutritional or physiological requirements for
the species is met by PCE 3; habitat free from disturbance that allows
for sufficient reproduction and survival opportunities is provided by
PCEs 1 and 4. All of the above described PCEs do not have to occur
simultaneously within a unit for the unit to constitute critical
habitat for Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora.
Based on our current knowledge of the life history, biology, and
ecology of Lomatium cookii and the characteristics of the habitat
necessary to sustain the essential life history functions of the
species, we have determined that the PCEs for the species' critical
habitat are:
(1) (A) In the Agate Desert, vernal pools and ephemeral wetlands
and the adjacent upland margins of these depressions that hold water
for a sufficient length of time to sustain Lomatium cookii germination,
growth, and reproduction. These vernal pools or ephemeral wetlands
support native plant populations and are seasonally inundated during
wet years but do not necessarily fill with water every year due to
natural variability in rainfall. Areas of sufficient size and quality
are likely to have the following characteristics:
Elevations from 372 to 411 m (1,220 to 1,350 ft);
Associated dominant native plants including, not limited
to: Alopecurus geniculatus, Deschampsia danthonioides, Eryngium
petiolatum, Lasthenia californica, Myosurus minimus, Navarretia
leucocephala ssp. leucocephala, Phlox gracilis, Plagiobothrys
bracteatus, Trifolium depauperatum, and Triteleia hyacinthina; and
A minimum area of 8 ha (20 ac) to provide intact hydrology
and protection from development and weed sources.
(1) (B) In the Illinois River Valley, wet meadows in oak and pine
forests that are seasonally inundated and support native plant
populations. Areas of sufficient size and quality are likely to have
the following characteristics:
Elevations from 383 to 488 m (1,256 to 1,600 ft);
Associated dominant native plants including, not limited
to Achnatherum lemmonii, Camassia spp., Danthonia californica,
Deschampsia cespitosa, Festuca roemeri, Poa secunda, Ranunculus
occidentalis, and Limnanthes gracilis var. gracilis;
Occur primarily in bottomland Quercus garryana-Quercus
kelloggii-Pinus ponderosa (Oregon white oak-California black oak-
ponderosa pine) forest openings along seasonal creeks; and
A minimum area of 12 ha (30 ac) to provide intact
hydrology and protection from development and weed sources.
(2) (A) In the Agate Desert, the hydrologically and ecologically
functional system of interconnected pools or ephemeral wetlands or
depressions within a matrix of surrounding uplands that together form
[[Page 37322]]
vernal pool complexes within the greater watershed. The associated
features may include the pool basin and ephemeral wetlands; an intact
hardpan subsoil underlying the surface soils up to 0.75 m (2.5 ft) in
depth; and surrounding uplands, including mound topography and other
geographic and edaphic features that support systems of hydrologically
interconnected pools and other ephemeral wetlands (which may vary in
extent depending on site-specific characteristics of pool size and
depth, soil type, and hardpan depth).
(2) (B) In the Illinois Valley, the hydrologically and ecologically
functional system of streams, slopes and wooded systems that surround
and maintain seasonally wet alluvial meadows underlain by relatively
undisturbed ultramafic soils within the greater watershed.
(3) (A) In the Agate Desert, silt, loam, and clay soils that are of
ultramafic and nonultramafic alluvial origin, with a 0 to 3 percent
slope, classified as Agate-Winlo or Provig-Agate soils.
(3) (B) In the Illinois Valley, silt, loam, and clay soils that are
of ultramafic and nonultramafic alluvial origin, with a 0 to 30 percent
slope, classified as Abegg gravelly loam, Brockman clay loam, Copsey
clay, Cornutt-Dubakel complex, Dumps, Eightlar extremely stony clay,
Evans loam, Foehlin gravelly loam, Josephine gravelly loam, Kerby loam,
Newberg fine sandy loam, Pearsoll-Rock outcrop complex, Pollard loam,
Riverwash, Speaker-Josephine gravelly loam, Takilma cobbly loam, or
Takilma Variant extremely cobbly loam.
(4) No or negligible presence of competitive nonnative invasive
plant species. Negligible is defined for the purpose of this rulemaking
as a minimal level of nonnative plant species that will still allow
Lomatium cookii to continue to survive and recover.
The need for space for individual and population growth,
germination, seed dispersal, and reproduction is provided by PCEs 1 and
4; the need for soil moisture for growth, germination, reproduction,
and seed dispersal is provided by PCE 2 (but not necessarily every
year); the need for other nutritional or physiological requirements for
the species is met by PCE 3; habitat free from disturbance that allows
for sufficient reproduction and survival opportunities is provided by
PCEs 1 and 4. All of the above described PCEs do not have to occur
simultaneously within a unit for the unit to constitute critical
habitat for Lomatium cookii.
This proposed designation includes the PCEs in the appropriate
quantity and spatial arrangement necessary to support the life history
functions of Limnanthes floccosa ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii
and are essential to the conservation of these species. Each of the
areas proposed in this rule has been determined to contain sufficient
PCEs to provide for one or more of the life history functions of L. f.
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii. All of the above described PCEs
do not have to occur simultaneously within a unit for the unit to
constitute critical habitat.
Criteria Used To Identify Critical Habitat Boundaries
As required by section 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act, we used the best
scientific data available in determining areas that contain the
features that are essential to the conservation of Limnanthes floccosa
ssp. grandiflora and Lomatium cookii. The steps we used in identifying
critical habitat are as follows:
(1) Our initial step was to determine, in accordance with section
3(5)(A)(i) of the Act and regulations in 50 CFR 424.12, the physical
and biological habitat features (the, PCEs) essential to the
conservation of the species as explained in the previous section.
(2) We identified areas occupied by Limnanthes floccosa ssp.
grandiflora and Lomatium cookii at the time of listing. Occupancy
status was determined using occurrence data from the ONHIC database
(ONHIC 2008), Medford BLM records (BLM 2005), a recent L. f. ssp.
grandiflora status report (Meyers 2008, pp. 1-65), Service staff
reports, data in reports submitted during section 7 consultations and
by biologists holding section 10(a)(1)(A) recovery permits, research
published in peer-reviewed articles, research presented in academic
theses and agency reports, regional GIS coverages, and the OSU
herbarium record database (OSU 2007). We determined occupancy at the
time of listing by comparing survey and collection information and
descriptions of occupied areas in the final listing rule published in
the Federal Register on November 7, 2002 (67 FR 68004). At