Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act, 36746 [E9-17696]
Download as PDF
36746
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices
page reproduction cost) payable to the
U.S. Treasury.
Maureen M. Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E9–17622 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
forward a check in that amount to the
Consent Decree Library at the stated
address.
Maureen M. Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E9–17696 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Clean Air Act
Notice is hereby given that on June
16, 2009, a proposed Consent Decree
(Decree) in the case of United States v.
American Laboratories, Inc., Civil
Action No. 8:09–CV–00194, was lodged
with the United States District Court for
the District of Nebraska. Under this
Consent Decree, the Settling Defendant
is required to pay a total of $440,000 in
civil penalty for alleged violations of the
Clean Air Act, and recover and reuse at
93% of total isopropyl alcohol and
implement best available control
technology at its pharmaceutical
manufacturing plant in Omaha,
Nebraska.
For thirty (30) days after the date of
this publication, the Department of
Justice will receive comments relating to
the Consent Decree. Comments should
be addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and either e-mailed
to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611. In either case, the
comments should refer to United States
v. American Laboratories, Inc., D.J. Ref.
No. 90–5–2–1–08313.
The Decree may be examined at the
Office of the United States Attorney,
1620 Dodge Street, Suite 1400, Omaha,
Nebraska 68102. During the comment
period, the Consent Decree may be
examined on the following Department
of Justice Web site: https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Consent Decree may also be obtained by
mail from the Consent Decree Library,
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, or
by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
requesting a copy from the Consent
Decree Library, please enclose a check
in the amount of $9.25 (with
attachments) or $8.00 (without
attachments) (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:55 Jul 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 07–14]
CBS Wholesale Distributors; Grant of
Renewal Application and Dismissal of
Proceeding
On January 5, 2007, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to CBS Wholesale
Distributors (Respondent), of
Hephzibah, Georgia. The Show Cause
Order proposed the revocation of
Respondent’s DEA Certificate of
Registration which authorizes it to
distribute List I chemicals, and the
denial of any pending applications to
renew or modify the registration, on the
ground that his ‘‘registration is
inconsistent with the public interest.’’
Show Cause Order at 1.
More specifically, the Show Cause
Order alleged that Respondent is
‘‘currently registered to distribute the
List I chemicals pseudoephedrine and
ephedrine,’’ id. at 2, and that both
chemicals are ‘‘commonly used to
illegally manufacture
methamphetamine, a schedule II
controlled substance.’’ Id. at 1. The
Show Cause Order alleged that ‘‘there
exists a ‘gray market’ in which certain
pseudoephedrine and ephedrine
products are distributed only to
convenience stores and gas stations,
from where they have a high incidence
of diversion,’’ and that these
establishments ‘‘continue to be the
primary source for precursors to be
diverted to illicit methamphetamine
laboratory operations in many states.’’
Id. at 1–2.
Next, the Show Cause Order alleged
that DEA had retained ‘‘an expert in the
field of retail marketing and statistics to
analyze national sales data for over-thecounter non-prescription drugs.’’ Id. at
2. The Order alleged that the expert had
determined that ‘‘the average small store
could expect to sell monthly only about
$10.00 to $30.00 worth of
pseudoephedrine products,’’ and ‘‘that
the potential for sales of combination
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ephedrine products [was] only about
one-fourth of those sales levels.’’ Id.
The Show Cause Order further alleged
that Respondent’s list I customers ‘‘are
almost exclusively convenience stores
and gas stations, which are part of the
gray market for diversion’’ of these
products, id. at 2, and that Respondent’s
‘‘sales of combination ephedrine
products are inconsistent with the
known legitimate market and known
end-user demand for products of this
type.’’ Id. at 3. The Order further alleged
that Respondent is ‘‘serving an
illegitimate market and [that its]
continued registration would likely lead
to increased diversion of List I
chemicals.’’ Id.1
Respondent timely requested a
hearing on the allegations. The matter
was placed on the docket of the
Agency’s Administrative Law Judges
(ALJ), and an ALJ conducted a hearing
in Savannah, Georgia on December 4–5,
2007. At the hearing, both the
Government and Respondent elicited
the testimony of witnesses and
submitted documentary evidence.
Following the hearing, both parties filed
briefs containing their proposed
findings of fact, conclusions of law, and
arguments.
On June 10, 2008, the ALJ issued her
recommended decision (ALJ). In her
decision, the ALJ found persuasive the
expert testimony of the Agency’s expert
witness that the average monthly sale of
ephedrine products to meet legitimate
demand is $14.39 and that Respondent’s
customers were purchasing between five
to eighty times this amount. ALJ at 33.
The ALJ thus concluded that
Respondent’s sales of ephedrine
products ‘‘to gray market entities are so
grossly excessive that there is a high
probability that these products are being
diverted for illicit purposes, and that
this fact alone outweighs’’ the evidence
that Respondent provided adequate
physical security for the products,
maintained adequate records, and was
selling only to customers who had
obtained the required certification
under the Combat Methamphetamine
Epidemic Act. Id. at 34. The ALJ thus
also concluded that ‘‘Respondent’s
continued registration would be
inconsistent with the public interest,’’
id. at 36, and recommended that its
registration be revoked and that any
pending applications to renew or
1 The Show Cause Order also alleged that
Respondent had ‘‘assisted * * * a former DEA
registrant, in maintaining his customer base [of
convenience stores and gas stations] for
combination ephedrine products, after he
surrendered his * * * registration for cause.’’ Show
Cause Order at 2. The Government, however,
offered no evidence in support of this allegation.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 141 (Friday, July 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17696]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act
Notice is hereby given that on June 16, 2009, a proposed Consent
Decree (Decree) in the case of United States v. American Laboratories,
Inc., Civil Action No. 8:09-CV-00194, was lodged with the United States
District Court for the District of Nebraska. Under this Consent Decree,
the Settling Defendant is required to pay a total of $440,000 in civil
penalty for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act, and recover and
reuse at 93% of total isopropyl alcohol and implement best available
control technology at its pharmaceutical manufacturing plant in Omaha,
Nebraska.
For thirty (30) days after the date of this publication, the
Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the Consent
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In either case, the
comments should refer to United States v. American Laboratories, Inc.,
D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-2-1-08313.
The Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States
Attorney, 1620 Dodge Street, Suite 1400, Omaha, Nebraska 68102. During
the comment period, the Consent Decree may be examined on the following
Department of Justice Web site: https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, or by faxing or e-mailing a request
to Tonia Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. (202) 514-0097,
phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy from the
Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $9.25
(with attachments) or $8.00 (without attachments) (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury or, if by e-
mail or fax, forward a check in that amount to the Consent Decree
Library at the stated address.
Maureen M. Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E9-17696 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P