Notice of FCIC's Proposed Pricing Methodology for Grain Sorghum, 36655-36656 [E9-17616]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices
Activities included in this proposal
would result in:
(a) Approximately 1,650 acres would
be thinned by removing understory and
midstory trees to improve stand health,
growth and resistance to insect and
disease;
(b) Approximately 400 acres of
overstocked stands within the Harris
Mountain Late Successional Reserve
would be thinned by removing
primarily understory and midstory trees
to promote the growth of large diameter
trees, improve stand health and reduce
ladder fuels. Thinning treatments would
retain 10 percent or more of the stand
in unthinned patches and up to 15
percent of the stand would be in heavily
thinned patches or openings up to 1⁄4
acre in size for stand diversity;
(c) Approximately 260 acres of
overstocked and diseased lodgepole
pine stands would be regenerated by
harvesting most overstory trees. A
minimum of 15 percent of the overstory
would remain. A new stand would be
established through natural regeneration
and targeted planting;
(d) Oak trees within harvest units and
one aspen stand of approximately 20
acres would be released by removing
conifers;
(e) Forest fuels would be reduced by
thinning to decrease understory and
mid-story stocking on a total of
approximately 2,050 acres. Following
harvest, approximately 320 acres of
heavy surface fuels would be machinepiled and burned. Underburning some
areas with a relatively cool surface fire
would reduce surface fuel loading.
Following thinning, 660 acres would be
underburned and prescribed fire would
reduce fuels on 620 acres outside
harvest units;
(f) Salvage harvest within the Harris
Mountain Late-Successional Reserve
would reduce fuel loading on 30 acres;
(g) Road management would decrease
the open-road density by
decommissioning approximately 1⁄2
mile of Forest System road and 11⁄2
miles of unclassified roads. Erosion of
existing roads would be decreased
through improved road drainage, culvert
replacement and surfacing roads with
rock.
Forest thinning and fuels reduction
would be accomplished primarily
through commercial harvest. Harvest
operations would yield sawtimber and
chip products. Trees would be felled,
removed and processed with
mechanized equipment. Harvested trees
would be transported from the stump to
central landing areas adjacent to roads
where they would be limbed and
processed into sawtimber logs or chips.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:55 Jul 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
Responsible Official
J. Sharon Heywood, Forest
Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National
Forest.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide
whether to implement the proposed
action, take an alternative action that
meets the purpose and need or take no
action.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. The project is
included in the Shasta-Trinity National
Forest’s quarterly schedule of proposed
actions (SOPA). Information on the
proposed action will also be posted on
the forest Web site (https://
www.fs.fed.us/r5/shastatrinity/projects)
and advertised in both the Redding
Record Searchlight and the Mount
Shasta Herald.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. The submission of timely
and specific comments can affect a
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative appeal or
judicial review.
Dated: July 16, 2009.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National
Forest.
[FR Doc. E9–17515 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Notice of FCIC’s Proposed Pricing
Methodology for Grain Sorghum
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Section 12009 of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Farm Bill) requires the Federal
Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) to
obtain the services of five expert
reviewers to ‘‘develop and recommend
a methodology for determining an
expected market price for grain sorghum
for both the production and revenuebased plans of insurance to more
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36655
accurately reflect the actual market
price at harvest’’ and for FCIC to publish
the selected methodology for notice and
comment on the methodology.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
will be accepted until September 22,
2009. A public meeting will be held on
August 20, 2009, at 9 a.m., at 6501
Beacon Drive, Kansas City, MO 64133 to
discuss the proposed methodology.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments to
Quintrell Hollis, United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA),
Product Design Branch, Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation, Risk
Management Agency, 6501 Beacon
Drive, Mail Stop 813, Kansas City, MO
64133. Written comments may also be
submitted electronically to:
grainpricecomments@rma.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Quintrell Hollis at the Kansas City, MO
address listed above, telephone (816)
926–3421.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The Risk Management
Agency (RMA), on behalf of FCIC, uses
the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) estimates to
establish grain sorghum price elections.
The Actual Production History (APH)
plan of insurance relies heavily on
projections from USDA’s World
Agricultural Supply and Demand
Estimates. The revenue-based plans of
insurance use USDA grain sorghum-tocorn ratio multiplied by a futures price.
The USDA’s grain sorghum estimate
reflects season average price, but the
National Sorghum Producers did not
feel that this process offers grain
sorghum producers a price that
adequately reflects harvest time price.
As a result, section 12009 of the 2008
Farm Bill requires FCIC to contract for
the services of five expert reviewers to
‘‘develop and recommend a
methodology for determining an
expected market price for grain sorghum
for both the production and revenuebased plans of insurance to more
accurately reflect the actual price at
harvest.’’ The legislation further
requires FCIC to review the
recommendations, consider the
recommendations when determining an
appropriate methodology, publish its
proposed methodology for public
comment, and implement a
methodology that is transparent and
replicable for 2010 crop year. The expert
reviewers, all agricultural economists
with experience in the grain sorghum
and corn markets, are from within
USDA, the grain sorghum industry and
institutions of higher learning. They are:
• Dr. Holly Wang, Purdue University.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
36656
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices
• Dr. James Richardson, Texas A&M
University.
• Chris Cogburn, National Sorghum
Producers.
• Robert Dismukes, Economic
Research Service.
• Greg Pompelli, Economic Research
Service.
Summary of Expert Reviews
The Economic Research Service (ERS)
reviews were similar and recommended
no changes to current pricing
methodology. ERS reviews revealed that
grain sorghum and corn prices across all
States and all years are highly
correlated.
Purdue University provided a
methodology that proposed regression
equations by State using National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
cash price data at State level or if no
State level NASS data were available,
national level NASS price data. The
model used data from 2004–2008.
The National Sorghum Producers
proposed a regression model based on
published monthly NASS prices,
exports and total use of grain sorghum
to calculate a grain sorghum-corn ratio.
The grain sorghum-corn ratio was then
multiplied by the USDA corn price
estimate for APH policies and for
revenue policies the ratio was
multiplied by the corn futures price.
The model used data from 1990–2008.
Texas A&M University proposed a
regression model based on regional
grain sorghum cash price data and corn
futures price at the Chicago Board of
Trade. Price elections were developed at
the national level and the model uses
data from 1979–2008.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Methododogy Selected
FCIC intends to implement the
methodology submitted by Texas A&M
University. This methodology met the
requirements of the 2008 Farm Bill of
being transparent and replicable. RMA
determined that this methodology was
the most accurate predictor of grain
sorghum prices at harvest time.
Details about this methodology as
well as the other methodologies
proposed by the expert reviewers can be
found at https://www.rma.usda.gov.
Signed in Washington, DC on July 20,
2009.
William J. Murphy,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9–17616 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:38 Jul 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Alpine County Resource Advisory
Committee (RAC)
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Alpine County Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold its
third meeting.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
September 2, 2009, and will begin at 6
p.m. The meeting will be held in Alpine
County at the Alpine Early Learning
Center, 100 Foothill Road, Markleeville,
CA 96120.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marnie Bonesteel, RAC Coordinator,
USDA, Humboldt-Toiyabe National
Forest, Carson Ranger District, 1536 S.
Carson Street, Carson City, NV 89701
(775) 884–8140; e-mail:
mbonesteel@fs.fed.us.
Agenda
items to be covered include: (1) Vote on
committee bylaws and elect a
chairperson, (2) Vote on Title II projects,
(3) Public Comment. The meeting is
open to the public. Public input
opportunity will be provided and
individuals will have the opportunity to
address the Committee at that time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: July 16, 2009.
Genny Wilson,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–17361 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Tuolumne County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Tuolumne County
Resource Advisory Committee will meet
on August 10, 2009 at the City of Sonora
Fire Department, in Sonora, California.
The purpose of the meeting is to vote on
projects, determine the need for an
August 17th meeting, and schedule
meetings and topics for 2010.
DATES: The meeting will be held August
10, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the City of Sonora Fire Department
located at 201 South Shepherd Street, in
Sonora, California (CA 95370).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beth
Martinez, Committee Coordinator,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
USDA, Stanislaus National Forest, MiWuk Ranger District, P.O. Box 100, MiWuk Village, CA 95346, (209) 586–3234;
E-mail: bethmartinez@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Tuolumne County RAC plans to expand
its geographic area to include Mariposa
County and will be reviewing and
recommending projects in both
counties. Agenda items to be covered
include: (1) Discussion and voting on
projects; (2) determine need for an
August 17 meeting; (3) schedule
meetings/topics for 2010; (4) public
comment on meeting proceedings. This
meeting is open to the public.
Dated: July 16, 2009.
Timothy A. Dabney,
Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9–17516 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–ED–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–941]
Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving
and Racks From the People’s Republic
of China: Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: July 24, 2009.
SUMMARY: On March 5, 2009, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published its
preliminary determination of sales at
less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’) in the
antidumping duty investigation of
certain kitchen appliance shelving and
racks (‘‘kitchen racks’’) from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). We
invited interested parties to comment on
our preliminary determination of sales
at LTFV. Based on our analysis of the
comments we received, we have made
changes from the Certain Kitchen
Appliance Shelving and Racks from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Postponement of Final
Determination, 74 FR 9591 (March 5,
2009) (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’).
The final dumping margins for this
investigation are listed in the ‘‘Final
Determination Margins’’ section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia
Hancock or Katie Marksberry, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 141 (Friday, July 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36655-36656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17616]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Notice of FCIC's Proposed Pricing Methodology for Grain Sorghum
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Section 12009 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of
2008 (2008 Farm Bill) requires the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
(FCIC) to obtain the services of five expert reviewers to ``develop and
recommend a methodology for determining an expected market price for
grain sorghum for both the production and revenue-based plans of
insurance to more accurately reflect the actual market price at
harvest'' and for FCIC to publish the selected methodology for notice
and comment on the methodology.
DATES: Written comments on this notice will be accepted until September
22, 2009. A public meeting will be held on August 20, 2009, at 9 a.m.,
at 6501 Beacon Drive, Kansas City, MO 64133 to discuss the proposed
methodology.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments to
Quintrell Hollis, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA),
Product Design Branch, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, Risk
Management Agency, 6501 Beacon Drive, Mail Stop 813, Kansas City, MO
64133. Written comments may also be submitted electronically to:
grainpricecomments@rma.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Quintrell Hollis at the Kansas City,
MO address listed above, telephone (816) 926-3421.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The Risk Management Agency (RMA), on behalf of FCIC,
uses the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimates to
establish grain sorghum price elections. The Actual Production History
(APH) plan of insurance relies heavily on projections from USDA's World
Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates. The revenue-based plans of
insurance use USDA grain sorghum-to-corn ratio multiplied by a futures
price. The USDA's grain sorghum estimate reflects season average price,
but the National Sorghum Producers did not feel that this process
offers grain sorghum producers a price that adequately reflects harvest
time price. As a result, section 12009 of the 2008 Farm Bill requires
FCIC to contract for the services of five expert reviewers to ``develop
and recommend a methodology for determining an expected market price
for grain sorghum for both the production and revenue-based plans of
insurance to more accurately reflect the actual price at harvest.'' The
legislation further requires FCIC to review the recommendations,
consider the recommendations when determining an appropriate
methodology, publish its proposed methodology for public comment, and
implement a methodology that is transparent and replicable for 2010
crop year. The expert reviewers, all agricultural economists with
experience in the grain sorghum and corn markets, are from within USDA,
the grain sorghum industry and institutions of higher learning. They
are:
Dr. Holly Wang, Purdue University.
[[Page 36656]]
Dr. James Richardson, Texas A&M University.
Chris Cogburn, National Sorghum Producers.
Robert Dismukes, Economic Research Service.
Greg Pompelli, Economic Research Service.
Summary of Expert Reviews
The Economic Research Service (ERS) reviews were similar and
recommended no changes to current pricing methodology. ERS reviews
revealed that grain sorghum and corn prices across all States and all
years are highly correlated.
Purdue University provided a methodology that proposed regression
equations by State using National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS) cash price data at State level or if no State level NASS data
were available, national level NASS price data. The model used data
from 2004-2008.
The National Sorghum Producers proposed a regression model based on
published monthly NASS prices, exports and total use of grain sorghum
to calculate a grain sorghum-corn ratio. The grain sorghum-corn ratio
was then multiplied by the USDA corn price estimate for APH policies
and for revenue policies the ratio was multiplied by the corn futures
price. The model used data from 1990-2008.
Texas A&M University proposed a regression model based on regional
grain sorghum cash price data and corn futures price at the Chicago
Board of Trade. Price elections were developed at the national level
and the model uses data from 1979-2008.
Proposed Methododogy Selected
FCIC intends to implement the methodology submitted by Texas A&M
University. This methodology met the requirements of the 2008 Farm Bill
of being transparent and replicable. RMA determined that this
methodology was the most accurate predictor of grain sorghum prices at
harvest time.
Details about this methodology as well as the other methodologies
proposed by the expert reviewers can be found at https://www.rma.usda.gov.
Signed in Washington, DC on July 20, 2009.
William J. Murphy,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9-17616 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P