Shasta-Trinity National Forest, California; Harris Vegetation Management Project, 36654-36655 [E9-17515]
Download as PDF
36654
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices
grant, or loan guarantee recipient to use
foreign iron, steel, or manufactured
goods in a given project. Project specific
exceptions may not be used unless
requested by the applicant, approved by
the Agency, and published in the
Federal Register as noted below.
Justifications: Any exception must be
based on one of the following three
justifications:
• Non-availability. Iron, steel, or
relevant manufactured goods are not
produced or manufactured in sufficient
and reasonably available commercial
quantities of a satisfactory quality.
• Unreasonable cost. The cost of
domestic iron, steel, or relevant
manufactured goods will increase the
cost of the overall project by more than
25%.
• Public interest. The application of
these restrictions would be inconsistent
with the public interest.
(4) International Agreements. Section
1605(d) does not apply to
implementation of the Buy American
provisions in Recovery Act for USDA,
Rural Development programs.
to be removed would generally be
smaller in size than trees retained;
renewable by-products including
commercial sawtimber and energy from
biomass are expected. Dying and
diseased mature lodgepole stands
within the project area would be
regenerated through the removal of most
overstory trees. Aspen and oak
hardwood trees species will be retained.
Removal of conifers competing with
existing aspen and oak hardwood trees
will enhance the overall diversity of
forest stands. Surface and ladder fuel
loads will be reduced through removal
of brush and small-diameter trees in the
forest understory and by underburning.
Proposed road reconstruction, closure
and decommissioning will aid in
restoration of drainage patterns and
sediment regimes supporting aquatic
systems. The project is located in
Siskiyou County within portions of
T41N, R1E, section 1; T42N R1E section
36; T42N R2E sections 17–21 and 28–
36; and T41N R2E sections 1–6 and 9
Mt. Diablo Meridian.
Dated: July 17, 2009.
Judith A. Canales,
Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–17600 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am]
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received no later
than 30 days after the publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected in April 2010 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected in September 2010.
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Shasta-Trinity National Forest,
California; Harris Vegetation
Management Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Shasta-Trinity National
Forest proposes to improve forest health
and restore fire-adapted ecosystem
characteristics on approximately 3,000
acres of National Forest System Lands
in and adjacent to the Harris Mountain
Late-Successional Reserve. Ground and
ladder fuels would be reduced. In
addition, forested stands would be
thinned to yield a fire-resilient forest
where periodic low-intensity surface
fires can be safely reintroduced.
Selective removal of trees is proposed to
produce forested areas dominated by
fire-resilient tree species with
sustainable densities and to exhibit
stand structure that provides habitat for
late-seral dependent species. Reducing
overcrowded conditions will enhance
tree survival from insects, drought and
disease, and natural disturbance. Trees
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:55 Jul 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
Send written comments to
District Ranger Priscila S. Franco,
Shasta-McCloud Management Unit, 204
W. Alma St., Mt. Shasta, California
96067. Electronic comments can be sent
via e-mail to: commentspacificsouthwest-shasta-trinitymtshasta-mccloud@fs.fed.us.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, anonymous
comments will not provide the
respondent with standing to participate
in subsequent administrative review or
judicial review.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Natvig, P.O. Box 688, Hot Springs, SD
57747, telephone (605) 745–3253, e-mail
jnatvig@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the proposed action is
to improve forest health and growth,
protect and enhance conditions of latesuccessional forest ecosystems and
reduce fuel loading. The 9,100 acre
project area falls within lands identified
by the Shasta-Trinity Land and
Resource Management Plan (Forest
Plan) as Matrix (76 percent) and LateSuccessional Reserve (24 percent).
Forest stands are overcrowded resulting
in competition for water, nutrients and
sunlight—conditions which increase the
risk of insect infestation. Lodgepole
pine stands in the project area are
overmature and infected with disease.
The overstory trees are dying and new
trees are becoming established;
however, disease is spreading from the
overstory to the new stand. Natural
disturbances, such as wildfire that
released aspen and oak hardwoods,
have been suppressed over the last 60
years; hardwoods are in decline as a
result. Conifer species dominate the
overstory canopy and out-compete
aspen and oak hardwoods for available
sunlight and other site resources. LateSuccessional Reserves are allocated by
the Forest Plan to provide latesuccessional and old-growth forest;
however, less than one percent of this
reserve is currently providing such
habitat (Shasta-Trinity National Forest
Wide Late-Successional Reserve
Assessment, 1999). Dense forest
conditions delay the development of
early seral to mid-successional
conditions and mid-successional to latesuccessional stands. Dense understory
trees coupled with an accumulation of
surface fuels increases the chances of a
wildfire reaching the overstory canopy,
yielding the potential for stand
replacement. The proposed action is
also designed to provide for proper
drainage of system roads to minimize
surface erosion. It will also ensure that
culverts in the area are fully functional
and of proper size to facilitate area
drainage and prevent erosion-causing
water flow over the surface of the road.
There are approximately two miles of
unclassified and Forest System roads in
the project area that are unnecessary for
long term management; the proposed
action would decommission these road
segments.
Proposed Action
The proposed action includes: (1)
Thinning in mixed conifer stands; (2)
lodgepole pine regeneration harvest; (3)
enhancement and retention of
hardwood species; (4) fuel treatments;
(5) road reconstruction; and (6) road
decommissioning.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices
Activities included in this proposal
would result in:
(a) Approximately 1,650 acres would
be thinned by removing understory and
midstory trees to improve stand health,
growth and resistance to insect and
disease;
(b) Approximately 400 acres of
overstocked stands within the Harris
Mountain Late Successional Reserve
would be thinned by removing
primarily understory and midstory trees
to promote the growth of large diameter
trees, improve stand health and reduce
ladder fuels. Thinning treatments would
retain 10 percent or more of the stand
in unthinned patches and up to 15
percent of the stand would be in heavily
thinned patches or openings up to 1⁄4
acre in size for stand diversity;
(c) Approximately 260 acres of
overstocked and diseased lodgepole
pine stands would be regenerated by
harvesting most overstory trees. A
minimum of 15 percent of the overstory
would remain. A new stand would be
established through natural regeneration
and targeted planting;
(d) Oak trees within harvest units and
one aspen stand of approximately 20
acres would be released by removing
conifers;
(e) Forest fuels would be reduced by
thinning to decrease understory and
mid-story stocking on a total of
approximately 2,050 acres. Following
harvest, approximately 320 acres of
heavy surface fuels would be machinepiled and burned. Underburning some
areas with a relatively cool surface fire
would reduce surface fuel loading.
Following thinning, 660 acres would be
underburned and prescribed fire would
reduce fuels on 620 acres outside
harvest units;
(f) Salvage harvest within the Harris
Mountain Late-Successional Reserve
would reduce fuel loading on 30 acres;
(g) Road management would decrease
the open-road density by
decommissioning approximately 1⁄2
mile of Forest System road and 11⁄2
miles of unclassified roads. Erosion of
existing roads would be decreased
through improved road drainage, culvert
replacement and surfacing roads with
rock.
Forest thinning and fuels reduction
would be accomplished primarily
through commercial harvest. Harvest
operations would yield sawtimber and
chip products. Trees would be felled,
removed and processed with
mechanized equipment. Harvested trees
would be transported from the stump to
central landing areas adjacent to roads
where they would be limbed and
processed into sawtimber logs or chips.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:55 Jul 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
Responsible Official
J. Sharon Heywood, Forest
Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National
Forest.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide
whether to implement the proposed
action, take an alternative action that
meets the purpose and need or take no
action.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. The project is
included in the Shasta-Trinity National
Forest’s quarterly schedule of proposed
actions (SOPA). Information on the
proposed action will also be posted on
the forest Web site (https://
www.fs.fed.us/r5/shastatrinity/projects)
and advertised in both the Redding
Record Searchlight and the Mount
Shasta Herald.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. The submission of timely
and specific comments can affect a
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative appeal or
judicial review.
Dated: July 16, 2009.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National
Forest.
[FR Doc. E9–17515 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Notice of FCIC’s Proposed Pricing
Methodology for Grain Sorghum
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Section 12009 of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Farm Bill) requires the Federal
Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) to
obtain the services of five expert
reviewers to ‘‘develop and recommend
a methodology for determining an
expected market price for grain sorghum
for both the production and revenuebased plans of insurance to more
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36655
accurately reflect the actual market
price at harvest’’ and for FCIC to publish
the selected methodology for notice and
comment on the methodology.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
will be accepted until September 22,
2009. A public meeting will be held on
August 20, 2009, at 9 a.m., at 6501
Beacon Drive, Kansas City, MO 64133 to
discuss the proposed methodology.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments to
Quintrell Hollis, United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA),
Product Design Branch, Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation, Risk
Management Agency, 6501 Beacon
Drive, Mail Stop 813, Kansas City, MO
64133. Written comments may also be
submitted electronically to:
grainpricecomments@rma.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Quintrell Hollis at the Kansas City, MO
address listed above, telephone (816)
926–3421.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The Risk Management
Agency (RMA), on behalf of FCIC, uses
the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) estimates to
establish grain sorghum price elections.
The Actual Production History (APH)
plan of insurance relies heavily on
projections from USDA’s World
Agricultural Supply and Demand
Estimates. The revenue-based plans of
insurance use USDA grain sorghum-tocorn ratio multiplied by a futures price.
The USDA’s grain sorghum estimate
reflects season average price, but the
National Sorghum Producers did not
feel that this process offers grain
sorghum producers a price that
adequately reflects harvest time price.
As a result, section 12009 of the 2008
Farm Bill requires FCIC to contract for
the services of five expert reviewers to
‘‘develop and recommend a
methodology for determining an
expected market price for grain sorghum
for both the production and revenuebased plans of insurance to more
accurately reflect the actual price at
harvest.’’ The legislation further
requires FCIC to review the
recommendations, consider the
recommendations when determining an
appropriate methodology, publish its
proposed methodology for public
comment, and implement a
methodology that is transparent and
replicable for 2010 crop year. The expert
reviewers, all agricultural economists
with experience in the grain sorghum
and corn markets, are from within
USDA, the grain sorghum industry and
institutions of higher learning. They are:
• Dr. Holly Wang, Purdue University.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 141 (Friday, July 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36654-36655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17515]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Shasta-Trinity National Forest, California; Harris Vegetation
Management Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Shasta-Trinity National Forest proposes to improve forest
health and restore fire-adapted ecosystem characteristics on
approximately 3,000 acres of National Forest System Lands in and
adjacent to the Harris Mountain Late-Successional Reserve. Ground and
ladder fuels would be reduced. In addition, forested stands would be
thinned to yield a fire-resilient forest where periodic low-intensity
surface fires can be safely reintroduced. Selective removal of trees is
proposed to produce forested areas dominated by fire-resilient tree
species with sustainable densities and to exhibit stand structure that
provides habitat for late-seral dependent species. Reducing overcrowded
conditions will enhance tree survival from insects, drought and
disease, and natural disturbance. Trees to be removed would generally
be smaller in size than trees retained; renewable by-products including
commercial sawtimber and energy from biomass are expected. Dying and
diseased mature lodgepole stands within the project area would be
regenerated through the removal of most overstory trees. Aspen and oak
hardwood trees species will be retained. Removal of conifers competing
with existing aspen and oak hardwood trees will enhance the overall
diversity of forest stands. Surface and ladder fuel loads will be
reduced through removal of brush and small-diameter trees in the forest
understory and by underburning. Proposed road reconstruction, closure
and decommissioning will aid in restoration of drainage patterns and
sediment regimes supporting aquatic systems. The project is located in
Siskiyou County within portions of T41N, R1E, section 1; T42N R1E
section 36; T42N R2E sections 17-21 and 28-36; and T41N R2E sections 1-
6 and 9 Mt. Diablo Meridian.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
no later than 30 days after the publication of this notice in the
Federal Register. The draft environmental impact statement is expected
in April 2010 and the final environmental impact statement is expected
in September 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to District Ranger Priscila S. Franco,
Shasta-McCloud Management Unit, 204 W. Alma St., Mt. Shasta, California
96067. Electronic comments can be sent via e-mail to: comments-pacificsouthwest-shasta-trinity-mtshasta-mccloud@fs.fed.us.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not provide
the respondent with standing to participate in subsequent
administrative review or judicial review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Natvig, P.O. Box 688, Hot
Springs, SD 57747, telephone (605) 745-3253, e-mail jnatvig@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the proposed action is to improve forest health and
growth, protect and enhance conditions of late-successional forest
ecosystems and reduce fuel loading. The 9,100 acre project area falls
within lands identified by the Shasta-Trinity Land and Resource
Management Plan (Forest Plan) as Matrix (76 percent) and Late-
Successional Reserve (24 percent). Forest stands are overcrowded
resulting in competition for water, nutrients and sunlight--conditions
which increase the risk of insect infestation. Lodgepole pine stands in
the project area are overmature and infected with disease. The
overstory trees are dying and new trees are becoming established;
however, disease is spreading from the overstory to the new stand.
Natural disturbances, such as wildfire that released aspen and oak
hardwoods, have been suppressed over the last 60 years; hardwoods are
in decline as a result. Conifer species dominate the overstory canopy
and out-compete aspen and oak hardwoods for available sunlight and
other site resources. Late-Successional Reserves are allocated by the
Forest Plan to provide late-successional and old-growth forest;
however, less than one percent of this reserve is currently providing
such habitat (Shasta-Trinity National Forest Wide Late-Successional
Reserve Assessment, 1999). Dense forest conditions delay the
development of early seral to mid-successional conditions and mid-
successional to late-successional stands. Dense understory trees
coupled with an accumulation of surface fuels increases the chances of
a wildfire reaching the overstory canopy, yielding the potential for
stand replacement. The proposed action is also designed to provide for
proper drainage of system roads to minimize surface erosion. It will
also ensure that culverts in the area are fully functional and of
proper size to facilitate area drainage and prevent erosion-causing
water flow over the surface of the road. There are approximately two
miles of unclassified and Forest System roads in the project area that
are unnecessary for long term management; the proposed action would
decommission these road segments.
Proposed Action
The proposed action includes: (1) Thinning in mixed conifer stands;
(2) lodgepole pine regeneration harvest; (3) enhancement and retention
of hardwood species; (4) fuel treatments; (5) road reconstruction; and
(6) road decommissioning.
[[Page 36655]]
Activities included in this proposal would result in:
(a) Approximately 1,650 acres would be thinned by removing
understory and midstory trees to improve stand health, growth and
resistance to insect and disease;
(b) Approximately 400 acres of overstocked stands within the Harris
Mountain Late Successional Reserve would be thinned by removing
primarily understory and midstory trees to promote the growth of large
diameter trees, improve stand health and reduce ladder fuels. Thinning
treatments would retain 10 percent or more of the stand in unthinned
patches and up to 15 percent of the stand would be in heavily thinned
patches or openings up to \1/4\ acre in size for stand diversity;
(c) Approximately 260 acres of overstocked and diseased lodgepole
pine stands would be regenerated by harvesting most overstory trees. A
minimum of 15 percent of the overstory would remain. A new stand would
be established through natural regeneration and targeted planting;
(d) Oak trees within harvest units and one aspen stand of
approximately 20 acres would be released by removing conifers;
(e) Forest fuels would be reduced by thinning to decrease
understory and mid-story stocking on a total of approximately 2,050
acres. Following harvest, approximately 320 acres of heavy surface
fuels would be machine-piled and burned. Underburning some areas with a
relatively cool surface fire would reduce surface fuel loading.
Following thinning, 660 acres would be underburned and prescribed fire
would reduce fuels on 620 acres outside harvest units;
(f) Salvage harvest within the Harris Mountain Late-Successional
Reserve would reduce fuel loading on 30 acres;
(g) Road management would decrease the open-road density by
decommissioning approximately \1/2\ mile of Forest System road and 1\1/
2\ miles of unclassified roads. Erosion of existing roads would be
decreased through improved road drainage, culvert replacement and
surfacing roads with rock.
Forest thinning and fuels reduction would be accomplished primarily
through commercial harvest. Harvest operations would yield sawtimber
and chip products. Trees would be felled, removed and processed with
mechanized equipment. Harvested trees would be transported from the
stump to central landing areas adjacent to roads where they would be
limbed and processed into sawtimber logs or chips.
Responsible Official
J. Sharon Heywood, Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National
Forest.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide whether to implement the proposed
action, take an alternative action that meets the purpose and need or
take no action.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. The project is
included in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest's quarterly schedule of
proposed actions (SOPA). Information on the proposed action will also
be posted on the forest Web site (https://www.fs.fed.us/r5/shastatrinity/projects) and advertised in both the Redding Record
Searchlight and the Mount Shasta Herald.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions. The submission of
timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to
participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review.
Dated: July 16, 2009.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9-17515 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M