Airworthiness Directives; BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ Airplanes, 35772-35774 [E9-16932]
Download as PDF
35772
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
document specifies the issue date of the
document; no other page of this document
contains this information.)
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact ATR–GIE Avions de
´
´
Transport Regional, 1, Allee Pierre Nadot,
31712 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
(0) 5 62 21 62 21; fax +33 (0) 5 62 21 67 18;
e-mail continued.airworthiness@atr.fr;
Internet https://www.aerochain.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 2,
2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–16929 Filed 7–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0398; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–193–AD; Amendment
39–15971; AD 2009–15–08
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Model
BAe 146 and Avro 146–RJ Airplanes
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
There have been a number of incidents
where wing-to-fuselage or MLG [main
landing gear] door fairing panels have
detached from the aircraft during flight.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Jul 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
Subsequent inspection revealed the loss of
the fairing panels to be due to failure of
certain steel grommets * * *. A detaching
panel could strike the aircraft during flight,
causing damage. In addition, a detaching
panel could become attached to the structure
or control surfaces, resulting in reduced
control of the aircraft.
*
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 25, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of August 25, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on April 30, 2009 (74 FR
19905). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
There have been a number of incidents
where wing-to-fuselage or MLG [main
landing gear] door fairing panels have
detached from the aircraft during flight.
Subsequent inspection revealed the loss of
the fairing panels to be due to failure of
certain steel grommets, (P/N) [part number]
SL5183 and HC535H0312, through which the
attachment bolts are inserted. These failures
may have been caused by improper
installation of the grommets or damage
resulting from maintenance procedures
relating to paint stripping and repainting,
allowing air loads to pull the panel through
the grommet. A detaching panel could strike
the aircraft during flight, causing damage. In
addition, a detaching panel could become
attached to the structure or control surfaces,
resulting in reduced control of the aircraft.
Following the application of BAE Systems
(Operations) Ltd ISB 53–202 at Revision 1 to
the first few, it has been discovered that
removal of existing grommets P/N SL5183
and HC535H0312 may result in localised
damage to the aluminum foil membrane
attached to the inner surface of some fairing
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
panels. BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has
therefore issued additional instructions in
All Operators Message (AOM) 08–015V,
including bonding checks and detailed
procedures for applying an electroconductive paste at each SL5185 grommet
location in order to bridge any gap between
grommet and the inner aluminum foil. The
next revision of BAE Systems (Operations)
Ltd ISB 53–202 will include the technical
content of AOM 08–015V.
For the reasons described above, this EASA
AD requires repetitive inspections of the
wing-to-fuselage & MLG door fairing panel
grommets and, when damage is detected, the
accomplishment of corrective actions.
Corrective actions include replacing
damaged grommets with new P/N
SL5185 grommets; or doing a temporary
repair, which defers the replacement.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Clarification for Unsatisfactory
Bonding
Unsatisfactory bonding, as used in
this AD, is defined as: Intermittent loss
of, or failure of the bond/electrical
connection.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 1
product of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 14 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $1,120.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Jul 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2009–15–08 BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited (Formerly British Aerospace
Regional Aircraft): Amendment 39–
15971. Docket No. FAA–2009–0398;
Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–193–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective August 25, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Model BAe 146–100A,
–200A, and –300A series airplanes; and
Model Avro 146–RJ70A, 146–RJ85A, and
146–RJ100A airplanes, certificated in any
category; all models, all serial numbers, that
have embodied modification HCM00633E or
HCM00934A.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53: Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
There have been a number of incidents
where wing-to-fuselage or MLG [main
landing gear] door fairing panels have
detached from the aircraft during flight.
Subsequent inspection revealed the loss of
the fairing panels to be due to failure of
certain steel grommets, (P/N) [part number]
SL5183 and HC535H0312, through which the
attachment bolts are inserted. These failures
may have been caused by improper
installation of the grommets or damage
resulting from maintenance procedures
relating to paint stripping and repainting,
allowing air loads to pull the panel through
the grommet. A detaching panel could strike
the aircraft during flight, causing damage. In
addition, a detaching panel could become
attached to the structure or control surfaces,
resulting in reduced control of the aircraft.
Following the application of BAE Systems
(Operations) Ltd ISB 53–202 at Revision 1 to
the first few, it has been discovered that
removal of existing grommets P/N SL5183
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35773
and HC535H0312 may result in localised
damage to the aluminum foil membrane
attached to the inner surface of some fairing
panels. BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has
therefore issued additional instructions in
All Operators Message (AOM) 08–015V,
including bonding checks and detailed
procedures for applying an electroconductive paste at each SL5185 grommet
location in order to bridge any gap between
grommet and the inner aluminum foil. The
next revision of BAE Systems (Operations)
Ltd ISB 53–202 will include the technical
content of AOM 08–015V.
For the reasons described above, this EASA
AD requires repetitive inspections of the
wing-to-fuselage & MLG door fairing panel
grommets and, when damage is detected, the
accomplishment of corrective actions.
Corrective actions include replacing damaged
grommets with new P/N SL5185 grommets;
or doing a temporary repair, which defers the
replacement.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) Within 4,000 flight cycles or 24 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 8,000 flight cycles, conduct a visual
inspection of the steel grommets on the
fairing panels in accordance with paragraph
2.C. of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–202,
Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008.
(2) If damage is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this
AD, before further flight, do the actions
specified in paragraph (f)(2)(i) or (f)(2)(ii) of
this AD.
(i) Replace the grommets with new P/N
SL5185 grommets in accordance with
paragraph 2.C. of BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–
202, Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008,
and concurrently conduct a bonding
inspection at each grommet location in
accordance with paragraph 2.C. of BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53–202, Revision 3,
dated December 10, 2008. If unsatisfactory
bonding is detected, before further flight,
apply electro-conductive paste in accordance
with Appendix 4 of BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.53–202, Revision 3, dated
December 10, 2008.
Note 1: Unsatisfactory bonding, as used in
this AD, is defined as: intermittent, loss of,
or failure of the bond/electrical connection.
(ii) Do a temporary repair in accordance
with Appendix 3 of the BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.53–202, Revision 3, dated
December 10, 2008, or an approved BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited temporary
repair scheme.
(3) For airplanes on which a temporary
repair specified in paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this
AD has been done: Within 8,000 flight cycles
after doing the temporary repair, replace any
temporary repair grommets with new P/N
SL5185 grommets in accordance with
paragraph 2.C. of BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
35774
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
202, Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008,
and concurrently conduct a bonding
inspection at each grommet location in
accordance with paragraph 2.C. of BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53–202, Revision 3,
dated December 10, 2008. If unsatisfactory
bonding is detected, before further flight,
apply electro-conductive paste in accordance
with Appendix 4 of BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.53–202, Revision 3, dated
December 10, 2008.
(4) For airplanes on which any new P/N
SL5185 grommets have been installed
without having a bonding inspection prior to
the effective date of this AD: Before or during
the next scheduled repetitive inspection in
accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of this AD,
conduct a bonding inspection in accordance
with paragraph 2.C. of BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.53–202, Revision 3, dated
December 10, 2008. If unsatisfactory bonding
is detected, before further flight, apply
electro-conductive paste in accordance with
Appendix 4 of BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–
202, Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008.
(5) Replacing all existing grommets with
new P/N SL5185 grommets on all panels,
including the corresponding bonding
inspections and the application of the
electro-conductive paste as applicable, in
accordance with BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–
202, Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008,
terminates the repetitive inspections required
by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
(6) Visual inspections, temporary repairs,
and replacements of the grommets are also
acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding requirements of paragraphs
(f)(1), (f)(2)(i), (f)(2)(ii), (f)(3), and (f)(5) of this
AD if done before the effective date of this
AD in accordance with BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.53–202, Revision 1, dated June
4, 2008.
(7) Visual inspections, temporary repairs,
replacements of the grommets, bonding
inspections, and applications of conductive
paste are also acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding requirements of
paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2)(i), (f)(2)(ii), (f)(3),
(f)(4), and (f)(5) of this AD if done before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–202,
Revision 2, dated October 24, 2008.
(8) Bonding inspections and applications
of conductive paste are also acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding
requirement of paragraphs (f)(2)(i), (f)(3),
(f)(4), and (f)(5) of this AD if done before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
BAE Systems (Operations) Limited All
Operator Message 08–015V, Issue 1, dated
August 22, 2008.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Jul 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Todd Thompson,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to ensure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2008–
0180, dated September 30, 2008; and BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53–202, Revision 3,
dated December 10, 2008; for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–
202, Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008, to
do the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact BAE Systems Regional
Aircraft, 13850 McLearen Road, Herndon,
Virginia 20171; telephone 703–736–1080;
e-mail raebusiness@baesystems.com; Internet
https://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/
RegionalAircraft/index.htm.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 2,
2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–16932 Filed 7–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–1365; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–076–AD; Amendment
39–15970; AD 2009–15–07]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A319, A320, and A321 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
In 2005 a lateral runway excursion
occurred on an A320 aircraft. Such
excursions are classified as hazardous, with
a large reduction in safety margins.
Investigation has shown that the aircraft
landed with the nose wheels rotated nearly
20 degrees from center. During subsequent
tests on the removed BSCU [Braking and
Steering Control Unit], a BSCU hardware
failure was found, affecting the monitoring
function, including the system
reconfiguration management, and leading to
a runaway of [the] Nose Wheel Steering
[uncommanded steering].
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is an
uncommanded steering condition
during takeoff or landing, which could
result in departure of the airplane from
the runway. We are issuing this AD to
require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 25, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of August 25, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 21, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35772-35774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16932]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0398; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-193-AD;
Amendment 39-15971; AD 2009-15-08
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model
BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
There have been a number of incidents where wing-to-fuselage or
MLG [main landing gear] door fairing panels have detached from the
aircraft during flight. Subsequent inspection revealed the loss of
the fairing panels to be due to failure of certain steel grommets *
* *. A detaching panel could strike the aircraft during flight,
causing damage. In addition, a detaching panel could become attached
to the structure or control surfaces, resulting in reduced control
of the aircraft.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective August 25, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 25,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on April 30, 2009 (74
FR 19905). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
There have been a number of incidents where wing-to-fuselage or
MLG [main landing gear] door fairing panels have detached from the
aircraft during flight. Subsequent inspection revealed the loss of
the fairing panels to be due to failure of certain steel grommets,
(P/N) [part number] SL5183 and HC535H0312, through which the
attachment bolts are inserted. These failures may have been caused
by improper installation of the grommets or damage resulting from
maintenance procedures relating to paint stripping and repainting,
allowing air loads to pull the panel through the grommet. A
detaching panel could strike the aircraft during flight, causing
damage. In addition, a detaching panel could become attached to the
structure or control surfaces, resulting in reduced control of the
aircraft.
Following the application of BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd ISB
53-202 at Revision 1 to the first few, it has been discovered that
removal of existing grommets P/N SL5183 and HC535H0312 may result in
localised damage to the aluminum foil membrane attached to the inner
surface of some fairing panels. BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has
therefore issued additional instructions in All Operators Message
(AOM) 08-015V, including bonding checks and detailed procedures for
applying an electro-conductive paste at each SL5185 grommet location
in order to bridge any gap between grommet and the inner aluminum
foil. The next revision of BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd ISB 53-202
will include the technical content of AOM 08-015V.
For the reasons described above, this EASA AD requires
repetitive inspections of the wing-to-fuselage & MLG door fairing
panel grommets and, when damage is detected, the accomplishment of
corrective actions.
Corrective actions include replacing damaged grommets with new P/N
SL5185 grommets; or doing a temporary repair, which defers the
replacement. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI
in the AD docket.
Clarification for Unsatisfactory Bonding
Unsatisfactory bonding, as used in this AD, is defined as:
Intermittent loss of, or failure of the bond/electrical connection.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 1 product of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it will take about 14 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the
[[Page 35773]]
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to be $1,120.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2009-15-08 BAE Systems (Operations) Limited (Formerly British
Aerospace Regional Aircraft): Amendment 39-15971. Docket No. FAA-
2009-0398; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-193-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
25, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model
BAe 146-100A, -200A, and -300A series airplanes; and Model Avro 146-
RJ70A, 146-RJ85A, and 146-RJ100A airplanes, certificated in any
category; all models, all serial numbers, that have embodied
modification HCM00633E or HCM00934A.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
There have been a number of incidents where wing-to-fuselage or
MLG [main landing gear] door fairing panels have detached from the
aircraft during flight. Subsequent inspection revealed the loss of
the fairing panels to be due to failure of certain steel grommets,
(P/N) [part number] SL5183 and HC535H0312, through which the
attachment bolts are inserted. These failures may have been caused
by improper installation of the grommets or damage resulting from
maintenance procedures relating to paint stripping and repainting,
allowing air loads to pull the panel through the grommet. A
detaching panel could strike the aircraft during flight, causing
damage. In addition, a detaching panel could become attached to the
structure or control surfaces, resulting in reduced control of the
aircraft.
Following the application of BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd ISB
53-202 at Revision 1 to the first few, it has been discovered that
removal of existing grommets P/N SL5183 and HC535H0312 may result in
localised damage to the aluminum foil membrane attached to the inner
surface of some fairing panels. BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has
therefore issued additional instructions in All Operators Message
(AOM) 08-015V, including bonding checks and detailed procedures for
applying an electro-conductive paste at each SL5185 grommet location
in order to bridge any gap between grommet and the inner aluminum
foil. The next revision of BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd ISB 53-202
will include the technical content of AOM 08-015V.
For the reasons described above, this EASA AD requires
repetitive inspections of the wing-to-fuselage & MLG door fairing
panel grommets and, when damage is detected, the accomplishment of
corrective actions.
Corrective actions include replacing damaged grommets with new P/N
SL5185 grommets; or doing a temporary repair, which defers the
replacement.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 4,000 flight cycles or 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later, and thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 8,000 flight cycles, conduct a visual inspection of
the steel grommets on the fairing panels in accordance with
paragraph 2.C. of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53-202, Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008.
(2) If damage is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further flight, do the actions
specified in paragraph (f)(2)(i) or (f)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Replace the grommets with new P/N SL5185 grommets in
accordance with paragraph 2.C. of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-202, Revision 3, dated December
10, 2008, and concurrently conduct a bonding inspection at each
grommet location in accordance with paragraph 2.C. of BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-202,
Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008. If unsatisfactory bonding is
detected, before further flight, apply electro-conductive paste in
accordance with Appendix 4 of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-202, Revision 3, dated December
10, 2008.
Note 1: Unsatisfactory bonding, as used in this AD, is defined
as: intermittent, loss of, or failure of the bond/electrical
connection.
(ii) Do a temporary repair in accordance with Appendix 3 of the
BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-
202, Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008, or an approved BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited temporary repair scheme.
(3) For airplanes on which a temporary repair specified in
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this AD has been done: Within 8,000 flight
cycles after doing the temporary repair, replace any temporary
repair grommets with new P/N SL5185 grommets in accordance with
paragraph 2.C. of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53-
[[Page 35774]]
202, Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008, and concurrently conduct a
bonding inspection at each grommet location in accordance with
paragraph 2.C. of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53-202, Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008. If
unsatisfactory bonding is detected, before further flight, apply
electro-conductive paste in accordance with Appendix 4 of BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-202,
Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008.
(4) For airplanes on which any new P/N SL5185 grommets have been
installed without having a bonding inspection prior to the effective
date of this AD: Before or during the next scheduled repetitive
inspection in accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, conduct a
bonding inspection in accordance with paragraph 2.C. of BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-202,
Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008. If unsatisfactory bonding is
detected, before further flight, apply electro-conductive paste in
accordance with Appendix 4 of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-202, Revision 3, dated December
10, 2008.
(5) Replacing all existing grommets with new P/N SL5185 grommets
on all panels, including the corresponding bonding inspections and
the application of the electro-conductive paste as applicable, in
accordance with BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.53-202, Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008, terminates
the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
(6) Visual inspections, temporary repairs, and replacements of
the grommets are also acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding requirements of paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2)(i),
(f)(2)(ii), (f)(3), and (f)(5) of this AD if done before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-202,
Revision 1, dated June 4, 2008.
(7) Visual inspections, temporary repairs, replacements of the
grommets, bonding inspections, and applications of conductive paste
are also acceptable for compliance with the corresponding
requirements of paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2)(i), (f)(2)(ii), (f)(3),
(f)(4), and (f)(5) of this AD if done before the effective date of
this AD in accordance with BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-202, Revision 2, dated October
24, 2008.
(8) Bonding inspections and applications of conductive paste are
also acceptable for compliance with the corresponding requirement of
paragraphs (f)(2)(i), (f)(3), (f)(4), and (f)(5) of this AD if done
before the effective date of this AD in accordance with BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited All Operator Message 08-015V, Issue 1, dated
August 22, 2008.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Todd
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to ensure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2008-0180, dated September 30, 2008; and BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-202,
Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53-202, Revision 3, dated December 10, 2008, to
do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact BAE
Systems Regional Aircraft, 13850 McLearen Road, Herndon, Virginia
20171; telephone 703-736-1080; e-mail raebusiness@baesystems.com;
Internet https://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 2, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-16932 Filed 7-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P