Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 Airplanes, 34276-34279 [E9-16779]
Download as PDF
34276
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2009–0649;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM–218–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by August
14, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A319–
111, –112, –113, –114, –115, –131, –132, and
–133 airplanes; Model A320–111, –211, –212,
–214, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes; and
Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212,
–213, –231, and –232 airplanes; certificated
in any category; all manufacturer serial
numbers (MSN); equipped with Electronic
Instrument System 1 (EIS1) standard V32
(Display Management Computer (DMC) Part
Number (P/N) 9615325032), EIS1 standard
V40 (DMC P/N 9615325040), or EIS1
standard V50 (DMC P/N 9615325050).
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 31: Instruments.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
Two incidents [of near mid-air collision]
have occurred on Airbus A320 Family
aircraft during [a] Resolution Advisory [from
the] Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance
System (TCAS). One of the Human-Machine
Interface (HMI) factors was the lack of
visibility of relevant information on the
Primary Flight Display (PFD).
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in erroneous interpretation of TCAS
Resolution Advisories, leading to an
increased risk of mid-air collision.
EIS1 software standard V60 introduces
modifications to the vertical speed indication
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Jul 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
to further improve the legibility in the case
of TCAS Resolution Advisory. This
modification consists of a change in the
needle colour and thickness and an increase
in width of the TCAS green band.
For the reasons described above, this AD
requires the introduction of the new software
standard V60 and prohibits reinstallation of
earlier software versions V32, V40 and V50.
dated January 22, 2008, for related
information.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions:
(1) Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD, modify the airplane by
installing EIS1 software standard V60 (DMC
P/N 9615325060) in accordance with the
instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A320–31–1286, dated January 22,
2008.
(2) After modifying an airplane as required
by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, no person
shall install EIS1 software standard V32
(DMC P/N 9615325032), EIS1 software
standard V40 (DMC P/N 9615325040), or
EIS1 software standard V50 (DMC P/N
9615325050) on that airplane.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tim Dulin,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2141; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2008–
0198, dated November 4, 2008; and Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A320–31–1286,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 9,
2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–16778 Filed 7–14–09; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0610; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–021–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
The result of re-assessment of rotor burst
analysis has shown the possibility of loss of
electrical power supply to the following
aircraft systems: Air Data System (ADS),
Ailerons, Multifunctional spoilers and
rudder, which result in loss of the aircraft
pitch and yaw control.
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER), Technical Publications
Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria
˜
Lima, 2170—Putim—12227–901 Sao
Jose dos Campos—SP—BRASIL;
telephone: +55 12 3927–5852 or +55 12
3309–0732; fax: +55 12 3927–7546; email: distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet:
https://www.flyembraer.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221
or 425–227–1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2848; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2009–0610; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–021–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
34277
Discussion
ˆ
The Agencia Nacional de Aviacao
¸˜
Civil (ANAC), which is the aviation
authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directive 2008–09–01,
dated September 30, 2008 (referred to
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
The result of re-assessment of rotor burst
analysis has shown the possibility of loss of
electrical power supply to the following
aircraft systems: Air Data System (ADS),
Ailerons, Multifunctional spoilers and
rudder, which result in loss of the aircraft
pitch and yaw control.
*
*
*
*
*
Required actions include modifying the
electrical wiring in the overhead panel
of the cockpit, modifying the air data
smart probe 3B power supply bus, and
modifying the Aeronautical Radio
Incorporated (ARINC) 429 data bus, as
applicable. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Embraer has issued the service
bulletins listed in the ‘‘Service
Information’’ table.
SERVICE INFORMATION
Embraer Service Bulletin—
Revision—
Dated—
170–24–0019 .....................................................................
170–24–0020 .....................................................................
170–31–0020 .....................................................................
Original .............................................................................
Original .............................................................................
01 ......................................................................................
December 6, 2006.
November 30, 2006.
May 21, 2008.
The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
MCAI.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Jul 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 77 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
about 62 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $668 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these costs. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$433,356, or $5,628 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
34278
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Jul 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Empresa Brasileira De Aeronautica S.A.
(Embraer): Docket No. FAA–2009–0610;
Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–021–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by August
14, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to EMBRAER Model
ERJ 170–100 LR, –100 STD, –100 SE, –100
SU, –200 LR, –200 STD, and –200 SU
airplanes; certificated in any category; as
identified in Embraer Service Bulletins 170–
24–0019, dated December 6, 2006; 170–24–
0020, dated November 30, 2006; and 170–31–
0020, Revision 01, dated May 21, 2008.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Codes 24 and 31: Electrical power
and Instruments, respectively.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
The result of re-assessment of rotor burst
analysis has shown the possibility of loss of
electrical power supply to the following
aircraft systems: Air Data System (ADS),
Ailerons, Multifunctional spoilers and
rudder, which result in loss of the aircraft
pitch and yaw control.
*
*
*
*
*
Required actions include modifying the
electrical wiring in the overhead panel of the
cockpit, modifying the air data smart probe
3B power supply bus, and modifying the
Aeronautical Radio Incorporated (ARINC)
429 data bus, as applicable.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions as applicable.
(1) For airplanes identified in Embraer
Service Bulletin 170–24–0019, dated
December 6, 2006: Within 6,000 flight hours
after the effective date of this AD, modify the
electrical wiring in the overhead panel of the
cockpit in accordance with Embraer Service
Bulletin 170–24–0019, dated December 6,
2006.
(2) For airplanes identified in Embraer
Service Bulletin 170–24–0020, dated
November 30, 2006: Within 6,000 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD,
change the Air Data Smart Probe 3 channel
B power supply bus from ESS2 to ESS3 in
accordance with Embraer Service Bulletin
170–24–0020, dated November 30, 2006.
(3) For airplanes identified in Embraer
Service Bulletin 170–31–0020, Revision 01,
dated May 21, 2008: Within 6,000 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
duplicate the Aeronautical Radio
Incorporated (ARINC) 429 airspeed signal for
an extension longer than the rotor burst
impact area; change the primary power
source for the modular avionics unit (MAU)
2 from DC BUS 2 to DC ESS BUS 2 to include
an additional ground and to provide dual
electrical power to MAU 2; and change the
wiring of the slat/flap actuators control
electronics (SF–ACE) 1 and 2 to primary
actuator control electronics (P–ACE) 1, 2, and
3; in accordance with Embraer Service
Bulletin 170–31–0020, Revision 01, dated
May 21, 2008.
(4) Actions accomplished before the
effective date of this AD according to
Embraer Service Bulletin 170–31–0020, dated
July 20, 2007, are considered acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding actions
specified in this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Kenny Kaulia,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2848; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
ˆ
(h) Refer to MCAI Agencia Nacional de
Aviacao Civil (ANAC) Airworthiness
¸˜
Directive 2008–09–01, dated September 30,
2008, and the service information identified
in Table 1 of this AD, for related information.
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
34279
TABLE 1—SERVICE INFORMATION
Embraer Service Bulletin—
Revision—
Dated—
170–24–0019 .....................................................................
170–24–0020 .....................................................................
170–31–0020 .....................................................................
Original .............................................................................
Original .............................................................................
01 ......................................................................................
December 6, 2006.
November 30, 2006.
May 21, 2008.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 8,
2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–16779 Filed 7–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr
Algie Walker Jr. at (240) 857–5380,
al.walker@afncr.af.mil
Department of the Air Force
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
32 CFR Part 865
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
[Docket No. USAF–2008–0002]
RIN 0701–AA74
Personnel Review Boards
AGENCY: Department of the Air Force,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
The Department of the Air
Force is proposing to amend part 865 of
Chapter VII, Title 32, Code of Federal
Regulations, by revising Subpart A, Air
Force Board for Correction of Military
Records. Subpart A establishes
procedures for the consideration of
applications for the correction of
military records and provides guidance
to applicants and others interested in
the process. This revision incorporates
format changes and clarifies various
minor provisions of the subpart. The
public is invited to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting comments to
the point of contact listed below.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments on or before
September 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or RIN
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
OSD Mailroom 3C843, Washington, DC
20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Jul 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
It has been determined that 32 CFR
part 865 is not a significant regulatory
action. This rule does not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of the recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Sec.
202, Pub. L. 104–4)
It has been certified that 32 CFR Part
865 does not contain a Federal Mandate
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local and Tribal governments, in
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
It has been determined that this rule
is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it
would not, if promulgated, have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Public Law 95–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
865 does not impose any additional
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Existing
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements approved under OMB
Control Number 0704–0003,
Application for Correction of Military
Record Under the Provisions of Title 10,
U.S. Code, Section 1552, will be used.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
It has been certified that 32 CFR Part
865 does not have federalism
implications, as set forth in Executive
Order 13132. This rule does not have
substantial direct effects on:
(1) The States;
(2) The relationship between the
National Government and the States; or
(3) The distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 865
Administrative practices and
procedures, Military personnel,
Records.
Accordingly, 32 CFR Part 865,
Subpart A, is proposed to be revised to
read as follows:
PART 865—PERSONNEL REVIEW
BOARDS
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 865 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 1034, 1552.2.
2. Revise Subpart A to read as follows:
Subpart A—Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
Sec.
865.0 Purpose.
865.1 Setup of the Board.
865.2 Board responsibilities.
865.3 Application procedures.
865.4 Board actions.
865.5 Decision of the Secretary of the Air
Force.
865.6 Reconsideration of applications.
865.7 Action after final decision.
865.8 Miscellaneous provisions.
Subpart A—Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records
§ 865.0
Purpose.
This subpart sets up procedures for
correction of military records to remedy
error or injustice. It tells how to apply
for correction of military records and
how the Air Force Board for Correction
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34276-34279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16779]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0610; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-021-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
The result of re-assessment of rotor burst analysis has shown
the possibility of loss of electrical power supply to the following
aircraft systems: Air Data System (ADS), Ailerons, Multifunctional
spoilers and rudder, which result in loss of the aircraft pitch and
yaw control.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
[[Page 34277]]
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--Putim--
12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--BRASIL; telephone: +55 12
3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax: +55 12 3927-7546; e-mail:
distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet: https://www.flyembraer.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2848; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0610;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-021-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC),
which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directive 2008-09-01, dated September 30, 2008 (referred
to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
The result of re-assessment of rotor burst analysis has shown
the possibility of loss of electrical power supply to the following
aircraft systems: Air Data System (ADS), Ailerons, Multifunctional
spoilers and rudder, which result in loss of the aircraft pitch and
yaw control.
* * * * *
Required actions include modifying the electrical wiring in the
overhead panel of the cockpit, modifying the air data smart probe 3B
power supply bus, and modifying the Aeronautical Radio Incorporated
(ARINC) 429 data bus, as applicable. You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Embraer has issued the service bulletins listed in the ``Service
Information'' table.
Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Embraer Service Bulletin-- Revision-- Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
170-24-0019............................ Original.................. December 6, 2006.
170-24-0020............................ Original.................. November 30, 2006.
170-31-0020............................ 01........................ May 21, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 77 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 62 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $668 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $433,356, or $5,628 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more
[[Page 34278]]
detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Empresa Brasileira De Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer): Docket No. FAA-
2009-0610; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-021-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by August 14, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to EMBRAER Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD, -
100 SE, -100 SU, -200 LR, -200 STD, and -200 SU airplanes;
certificated in any category; as identified in Embraer Service
Bulletins 170-24-0019, dated December 6, 2006; 170-24-0020, dated
November 30, 2006; and 170-31-0020, Revision 01, dated May 21, 2008.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Codes 24 and 31:
Electrical power and Instruments, respectively.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
The result of re-assessment of rotor burst analysis has shown
the possibility of loss of electrical power supply to the following
aircraft systems: Air Data System (ADS), Ailerons, Multifunctional
spoilers and rudder, which result in loss of the aircraft pitch and
yaw control.
* * * * *
Required actions include modifying the electrical wiring in the
overhead panel of the cockpit, modifying the air data smart probe 3B
power supply bus, and modifying the Aeronautical Radio Incorporated
(ARINC) 429 data bus, as applicable.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions as applicable.
(1) For airplanes identified in Embraer Service Bulletin 170-24-
0019, dated December 6, 2006: Within 6,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, modify the electrical wiring in the
overhead panel of the cockpit in accordance with Embraer Service
Bulletin 170-24-0019, dated December 6, 2006.
(2) For airplanes identified in Embraer Service Bulletin 170-24-
0020, dated November 30, 2006: Within 6,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, change the Air Data Smart Probe 3 channel
B power supply bus from ESS2 to ESS3 in accordance with Embraer
Service Bulletin 170-24-0020, dated November 30, 2006.
(3) For airplanes identified in Embraer Service Bulletin 170-31-
0020, Revision 01, dated May 21, 2008: Within 6,000 flight hours
after the effective date of this AD, duplicate the Aeronautical
Radio Incorporated (ARINC) 429 airspeed signal for an extension
longer than the rotor burst impact area; change the primary power
source for the modular avionics unit (MAU) 2 from DC BUS 2 to DC ESS
BUS 2 to include an additional ground and to provide dual electrical
power to MAU 2; and change the wiring of the slat/flap actuators
control electronics (SF-ACE) 1 and 2 to primary actuator control
electronics (P-ACE) 1, 2, and 3; in accordance with Embraer Service
Bulletin 170-31-0020, Revision 01, dated May 21, 2008.
(4) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD
according to Embraer Service Bulletin 170-31-0020, dated July 20,
2007, are considered acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding actions specified in this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2848; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de
Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC) Airworthiness Directive 2008-09-
01, dated September 30, 2008, and the service information identified
in Table 1 of this AD, for related information.
[[Page 34279]]
Table 1--Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Embraer Service Bulletin-- Revision-- Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
170-24-0019............................ Original.................. December 6, 2006.
170-24-0020............................ Original.................. November 30, 2006.
170-31-0020............................ 01........................ May 21, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 8, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-16779 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P