Personnel Review Boards, 34279-34283 [E9-16338]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
34279
TABLE 1—SERVICE INFORMATION
Embraer Service Bulletin—
Revision—
Dated—
170–24–0019 .....................................................................
170–24–0020 .....................................................................
170–31–0020 .....................................................................
Original .............................................................................
Original .............................................................................
01 ......................................................................................
December 6, 2006.
November 30, 2006.
May 21, 2008.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 8,
2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–16779 Filed 7–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr
Algie Walker Jr. at (240) 857–5380,
al.walker@afncr.af.mil
Department of the Air Force
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
32 CFR Part 865
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
[Docket No. USAF–2008–0002]
RIN 0701–AA74
Personnel Review Boards
AGENCY: Department of the Air Force,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
The Department of the Air
Force is proposing to amend part 865 of
Chapter VII, Title 32, Code of Federal
Regulations, by revising Subpart A, Air
Force Board for Correction of Military
Records. Subpart A establishes
procedures for the consideration of
applications for the correction of
military records and provides guidance
to applicants and others interested in
the process. This revision incorporates
format changes and clarifies various
minor provisions of the subpart. The
public is invited to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting comments to
the point of contact listed below.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments on or before
September 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or RIN
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
OSD Mailroom 3C843, Washington, DC
20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Jul 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
It has been determined that 32 CFR
part 865 is not a significant regulatory
action. This rule does not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of the recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Sec.
202, Pub. L. 104–4)
It has been certified that 32 CFR Part
865 does not contain a Federal Mandate
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local and Tribal governments, in
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
It has been determined that this rule
is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it
would not, if promulgated, have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Public Law 95–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
865 does not impose any additional
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Existing
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements approved under OMB
Control Number 0704–0003,
Application for Correction of Military
Record Under the Provisions of Title 10,
U.S. Code, Section 1552, will be used.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
It has been certified that 32 CFR Part
865 does not have federalism
implications, as set forth in Executive
Order 13132. This rule does not have
substantial direct effects on:
(1) The States;
(2) The relationship between the
National Government and the States; or
(3) The distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 865
Administrative practices and
procedures, Military personnel,
Records.
Accordingly, 32 CFR Part 865,
Subpart A, is proposed to be revised to
read as follows:
PART 865—PERSONNEL REVIEW
BOARDS
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 865 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 1034, 1552.2.
2. Revise Subpart A to read as follows:
Subpart A—Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
Sec.
865.0 Purpose.
865.1 Setup of the Board.
865.2 Board responsibilities.
865.3 Application procedures.
865.4 Board actions.
865.5 Decision of the Secretary of the Air
Force.
865.6 Reconsideration of applications.
865.7 Action after final decision.
865.8 Miscellaneous provisions.
Subpart A—Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records
§ 865.0
Purpose.
This subpart sets up procedures for
correction of military records to remedy
error or injustice. It tells how to apply
for correction of military records and
how the Air Force Board for Correction
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
34280
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
of Military Records (AFBCMR, or the
Board) considers applications. It defines
the Board’s authority to act on
applications. It directs collecting and
maintaining information subject to the
Privacy Act of 1974 authorized by 10
U.S.C. 1034 and 1552. System of
Records notice F035 SAFCB A, Military
Records Processed by the Air Force
Correction Board, applies.
§ 865.1
Setup of the Board.
The AFBCMR operates within the
Office of the Secretary of the Air Force
according to 10 U.S.C. 1552. The Board
consists of civilians in the executive
part of the Department of the Air Force
who are appointed and serve at the
pleasure of the Secretary of the Air
Force. Three members constitute a
quorum of the Board.
§ 865.2
Board responsibilities.
(a) Considering Applications. The
Board considers all individual
applications properly brought before it.
In appropriate cases, it directs
correction of military records to remove
an error or injustice, or recommends
such correction.
(b) Recommending Action. When an
applicant alleges reprisal under the
Military Whistleblowers Protection Act,
10 U.S.C. 1034, the Board may
recommend to the Secretary of the Air
Force that disciplinary or administrative
action be taken against those
responsible for the reprisal.
(c) Deciding Cases. The Board
normally decides cases on the evidence
of the record. It is not an investigative
body. However, the Board may, in its
discretion, hold a hearing or call for
additional evidence or opinions in any
case.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 865. 3
Application procedures.
(a) Who May Apply:
(1) In most cases, the applicant is a
member or former member of the Air
Force, since the request is personal to
the applicant and relates to his or her
military records.
(2) An applicant with a proper
interest may request correction of
another person’s military records when
that person is incapable of acting on his
or her own behalf, is missing, or is
deceased. Depending on the
circumstances, a child, spouse, civilian
employee or former civilian employee,
former spouse, parent or other close
relative, an heir, or a legal
representative (such as a guardian or
executor) of the member or former
member may be able to show a proper
interest. Applicants will send proof of
proper interest with the application
when requesting correction of another
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Jul 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
person’s military records. An
application may be returned when
proper interest has not been shown.
(3) A member, former member,
employee or former employee,
dependent, and current or former
spouse may apply to correct a document
or other record of any other military
matter that affects them (This does not
include records pertaining to civilian
employment matters). Applicants will
send proof of the effect of the document
or record upon them with the
application when requesting a
correction under this provision.
(b) Getting Forms. Applicants may get
a DD Form 149, ‘‘Application for
Correction of Military Record Under the
Provisions of Title 10, U.S.C., 1552,’’
and Air Force Pamphlet 36–2607,
Applicants’ Guide to the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records
(AFBCMR), from:
(1) Any Air Force Military Personnel
Flight (MPF) or publications
distribution office.
(2) Most veterans’ service
organizations.
(3) The Air Force Review Boards
Office, SAF/MRBR, 550 C Street West,
Suite 40, Randolph AFB TX 78150–
4742.
(4) The AFBCMR, 1535 Command
Drive, EE Wing 3rd Floor, Andrews AFB
MD 20762–7002.
(5) Thru the Internet at https://www.
dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/
eforms/dd0149.pdf (DD Form 149) and
https://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/
media/epubs/AFPAM36–2607.pdf (Air
Force Pamphlet 36–2607).
(c) Preparation. Before applying,
applicants should:
(1) Review Air Force Pamphlet 36–
2607.
(2) Discuss their concerns with MPF,
finance office, or other appropriate
officials. Errors can often be corrected
administratively without resort to the
Board.
(3) Exhaust other available
administrative remedies (otherwise the
Board may return the request without
considering it).
(d) Submitting the Application.
Applicants should complete all
applicable sections of the DD Form 149,
including at least:
(1) The name under which the
member served.
(2) The member’s social security
number or Air Force service number.
(3) The applicant’s current mailing
address.
(4) The specific records correction
being requested.
(5) Proof of proper interest if
requesting correction of another
person’s records.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(6) The applicant’s original signature.
(e) Applicants should mail the
original signed DD Form 149 and any
supporting documents to the Air Force
address on the back of the form.
(f) Meeting Time Limits. Ordinarily,
applicants must file an application
within 3 years after the error or injustice
was discovered, or, with due diligence,
should have been discovered. In
accordance with Federal law, time on
active duty is not included in the 3 year
period. An application filed later is
untimely and may be denied by the
Board on that basis.
(1) The Board may excuse untimely
filing in the interest of justice.
(2) If the application is filed late,
applicants should explain why it would
be in the interest of justice for the Board
to waive the time limits.
(g) Stay of Other Proceedings.
Applying to the AFBCMR does not stay
other proceedings.
(h) Counsel Representation.
Applicants may be represented by
counsel, at their own expense.
(1) The term ‘‘counsel’’ includes
members in good standing of the bar of
any State, accredited representatives of
veterans’ organizations recognized
under by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 5902(a)(1),
and other persons determined by the
Executive Director of the Board to be
competent to represent the interests of
the applicant.
(2) See DoDD 7050.06, Military
Whistleblower Protection 1 and AFI 90–
301, Inspector General Complaints
Resolution, for special provisions for
counsel in cases processed under 10
U.S.C. 1034.
(i) Page Limitations on Briefs. Briefs
in support of applications:
(1) May not exceed 25 double-spaced
typewritten pages.
(2) Must be typed on one side of a
page only with not more than 12
characters per inch.
(3) Must be assembled in a manner
that permits easy reproduction.
(4) Responses to advisory opinions
must not exceed 10 double-spaced
typewritten pages and meet the other
requirements for briefs.
(5) These limitations do not apply to
supporting documentary evidence.
(6) In complex cases and upon
request, the Executive Director of the
Board may waive these limitations.
(j) Withdrawing Applications.
Applicants may withdraw an
application at any time before the
Board’s decision. Withdrawal does not
stay the 3-year time limit.
1 Available via the Internet at https://
www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/
705006p.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(k) Authority to Reject Applications.
The Executive Director may return an
application without action, if, after
consultation with legal counsel, he or
she determines that the application is
clearly frivolous, or the remedy that is
requested is beyond the authority of the
Board. This authority may not be
delegated.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 865.4
Board actions.
(a) Board Information Sources. The
applicant has the burden of providing
sufficient evidence of material error or
injustice. However, the Board:
(1) May get additional information
and advisory opinions on an application
from any Air Force organization or
official.
(2) May ask the applicant to furnish
additional information regarding
matters before the Board.
(b) Applicants will be given an
opportunity to review and comment on
advisory opinions and additional
information obtained by the Board.
They will also be provided with a copy
of correspondence to or from the Air
Force Review Boards Agency with an
entity outside the Air Force Review
Boards Agency in accordance with the
provisions of 10 U.S.C. 1556.
(c) Consideration by the Board. A
panel consisting of at least three board
members considers each application.
One panel member serves as its chair.
The panel’s actions and decisions
constitute the actions and decisions of
the Board.
(d) The panel may decide the case in
executive session or authorize a hearing.
When a hearing is authorized, the
procedures in § 865.4(f), of this part,
apply.
(e) Board Deliberations. Normally
only members of the Board and Board
staff will be present during
deliberations. The panel chair may
permit observers for training purposes
or otherwise in furtherance of the
functions of the Board.
(f) Board Hearings. The Board in its
sole discretion determines whether to
grant a hearing. Applicants do not have
a right to a hearing before the Board.
(1) The Executive Director will notify
the applicant or counsel, if any, of the
time and place of the hearing. Written
notice will be mailed 30 days in
advance of the hearing unless the notice
period is waived by the applicant. The
applicant will respond not later than 15
days before the hearing date, accepting
or declining the offer of a hearing and,
if accepting, provide information
pertaining to counsel and witnesses.
The Board will decide the case in
executive session if the applicant
declines the hearing or fails to appear.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Jul 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
(2) When granted a hearing, the
applicant may appear before the Board
with or without counsel and may
present witnesses. It is the applicant’s
responsibility to notify witnesses,
arrange for their attendance at the
hearing, and pay any associated costs.
(3) The panel chair conducts the
hearing, maintains order, and ensures
the applicant receives a full and fair
opportunity to be heard. Formal rules of
evidence do not apply, but the panel
observes reasonable bounds of
competency, relevancy, and materiality.
Witnesses other than the applicant will
not be present except when testifying.
Witnesses will testify under oath or
affirmation. A recorder will record the
proceedings verbatim. The chair will
normally limit hearings to 2 hours but
may allow more time if necessary to
ensure a full and fair hearing.
(4) Additional provisions apply to
cases processed under 10 U.S.C. 1034.
See DoDD 7050.06, Military
Whistleblower Protection 2, and AFI 90–
301, Inspector General Complaints
Resolution.
(g) The Board will not deny or
recommend denial of an application on
the sole ground that the issue already
has been decided by the Secretary of the
Air Force or the President of the United
States in another proceeding.
(h) Board Decisions. The panel’s
majority vote constitutes the action of
the Board. The Board will make
determinations on the following issues
in writing:
(1) Whether the provisions of the
Military Whistleblowers Protection Act
apply to the application. This
determination is needed only when the
applicant invokes the protection of the
Act, or when the question of its
applicability is otherwise raised by the
evidence.
(2) Whether the application was
timely filed and, if not, whether the
applicant has demonstrated that it
would be in the interest of justice to
excuse the untimely filing. When the
Board determines that an application is
not timely, and does not excuse its
untimeliness, the application will be
denied on that basis.
(3) Whether the applicant has
exhausted all available and effective
administrative remedies. If the applicant
has not, the application will be denied
on that basis.
(4) Whether the applicant has
demonstrated the existence of a material
error or injustice that can be remedied
effectively through correction of the
2 Copies may be obtained via the Internet at
https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/
705006p.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34281
applicant’s military record and, if so,
what corrections are needed to provide
full and effective relief.
(5) In Military Whistleblowers
Protection Act cases only, whether to
recommend to the Secretary of the Air
Force that disciplinary or administrative
action be taken against any Air Force
official whom the Board finds to have
committed an act of reprisal against the
applicant. Any determination on this
issue will not be made a part of the
Board’s record of proceedings and will
not be given to the applicant, but will
be provided directly to the Secretary of
the Air Force under separate cover (Sec
865.2b, of this part).
(i) Record of Proceedings. The Board
staff will prepare a record of
proceedings following deliberations
which will include:
(1) The name and vote of each Board
member.
(2) The application.
(3) Briefs and written arguments.
(4) Documentary evidence.
(5) A hearing transcript if a hearing
was held.
(6) Advisory opinions and the
applicant’s related comments.
(7) The findings, conclusions, and
recommendations of the Board.
(8) Minority reports, if any.
(9) Other information necessary to
show a true and complete history of the
proceedings.
(j) Minority Reports. A dissenting
panel member may prepare a minority
report which may address any aspect of
the case.
(k) Separate Communications. The
Board may send comments or
recommendations to the Secretary of the
Air Force as to administrative or
disciplinary action against individuals
found to have committed acts of reprisal
prohibited by the Military
Whistleblowers Protection Act and on
other matters arising from an
application not directly related to the
requested correction of military records.
Such comments and recommendations
will be separately communicated and
will not be included in the record of
proceedings or given to the applicant or
counsel.
(l) Final Action by the Board. The
Board acts for the Secretary of the Air
Force and its decision is final when it:
(1) Denies any application (except
under 10 U.S.C. 1034).
(2) Grants any application in whole or
part when the relief was recommended
by the official preparing the advisory
opinion, was unanimously agreed to by
the panel, and does not affect an
appointment or promotion requiring
confirmation by the Senate., and does
not affect a matter for which the
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
34282
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Secretary of the Air Force or his or her
delegee has withheld decision authority
or required notification before final
decision.
(3) The Board sends the record of
proceedings on all other applications to
the Secretary of the Air Force or his or
her designee for final decision.
(m) The Board may identify DoD or
Air Force policies, instructions,
guidance or practices that are leading to,
or likely to lead to unsound business
decisions, unfair results, waste of
government funds or public criticism.
The Board will forward such
observations directly to the appropriate
offices of the Secretariat and/or Air Staff
for review and evaluation. Such
observations will not be included in the
record of proceedings.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 865.5
Force.
Decision of the Secretary of the Air
(a) The Secretary may direct such
action as he or she deems appropriate
on each case, including returning the
case to the Board for further
consideration. Cases returned to the
Board for further reconsideration will be
accompanied by a brief statement of the
reasons for such action. If the Secretary
does not accept the Board’s
recommendation, the Secretary’s
decision will be in writing and will
include a brief statement of the grounds
for his/her final decision.
(b) Decisions in Cases Under the
Military Whistleblowers Protection Act.
The Secretary will issue decisions on
such cases within 180 days after receipt
of the case and will, unless the full
relief requested is granted, inform
applicants of their right to request
review of the decision by the Secretary
of Defense (SecDef). Applicants will
also be informed:
(1) Of the name and address of the
official to whom the request for review
must be submitted.
(2) That the request for review must
be submitted within 90 days after
receipt of the decision by the Secretary
of the Air Force.
(3) That the request for review must
be in writing and include the
applicant’s name, address, and
telephone number; a copy of the
application to the AFBCMR and the
final decision of the Secretary of the Air
Force; and a statement of the specific
reasons the applicant is not satisfied
with the decision of the Secretary of the
Air Force.
(4) That the request must be based on
the Board record; requests for review
based on factual allegations or evidence
not previously presented to the Board
will not be considered under this
paragraph but may be the basis for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Jul 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
reconsideration by the Board under
§ 865.6.
(c) In cases under § 865.5(b) of this
part which involve additional issues not
cognizable under that paragraph, the
additional issues may be considered
separately by the Board under § 865.3
and § 865.4 of this part. The special time
limit in § 865.5 (b) does not apply to the
decision concerning these additional
issues.
(d) Decisions in High Profile or
Sensitive Cases. Prior to taking final
action on a BCMR application that has
generated, or is likely to generate,
significant public or Congressional
interest, the Secretarial designee will
provide the case record of proceedings
through Secretarial channels to OSAF so
that the Secretary can determine
whether to decide the case personally or
take other action the Secretary deems
appropriate.
§ 865.6
Reconsideration of applications.
(a) The Board may reconsider an
application if the applicant submits
newly discovered relevant evidence that
was not reasonably available when the
application was previously considered.
The Executive Director or Team Chiefs
will screen each request for
reconsideration to determine whether it
contains new evidence. New arguments
about, or analysis of, evidence already
considered, and additional statements
which are cumulative to those already
in the record of proceedings will not be
considered new evidence.
(b) If the request contains new
evidence, the Executive Director or his/
her designee will refer it to a panel of
the Board for a decision. The Board will
decide the relevance and weight of any
new evidence, whether it was
reasonably available to the applicant
when the application was previously
considered, and whether it was
submitted in a timely manner. The
Board may deny reconsideration if the
request does not meet the criteria for
reconsideration. Otherwise the Board
will reconsider the application and
decide the case either on timeliness or
merit as appropriate.
(c) If the request does not contain new
evidence, the Executive Director or his/
her designee will return it to the
applicant without referral to the Board.
§ 856.7
Action after final decision.
(a) Action by the Executive Director.
The Executive Director or his/her
designee will inform the applicant or
counsel, if any, of the final decision on
the application. If any requested relief
was denied, the Executive Director will
advise the applicant of reconsideration
procedures and, for cases processed
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
under the Military Whistleblowers
Protection Act, review by the SecDef.
The Executive Director will send
decisions requiring corrective action to
the Chief of Staff, U.S. Air Force, for
necessary action.
(b) Settlement of Claims. The Air
Force is authorized, under 10 U.S.C.
1552, to pay claims for amounts due to
applicants as a result of correction of
military records.
(1) The Executive Director will
furnish the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service (DFAS) with
AFBCMR decisions potentially affecting
monetary entitlement or benefits. DFAS
will treat such decisions as claims for
payment by or on behalf of the
applicant.
(2) DFAS settles claims on the basis
of the corrected military record.
Computation of the amount due, if any,
is a function of DFAS. Applicants may
be required to furnish additional
information to DFAS to establish their
status as proper parties to the claim and
to aid in deciding amounts due.
(3) Earnings received from civilian
employment during any period for
which active duty pay and allowances
are payable will be deducted from the
settlement. Amounts found due will be
offset by the amount of any existing
indebtedness to the government in
compliance with the Debt Collection
Act of 1982 or successor statutes.
(c) Public Access to Decisions. After
deletion of personal information,
AFBCMR decisions will be made
available for review and copying at an
electronic public reading room.
§ 865.8
Miscellaneous provisions.
(a) At the request of the Board, all Air
Force activities and officials will furnish
the Board with:
(1) All available military records
pertinent to an application.
(2) An advisory opinion concerning
an application. The advisory opinion
will include an analysis of the facts of
the case and of the applicant’s
contentions, a statement of whether or
not the requested relief can be done
administratively, and a recommendation
on the timeliness and merit of the
request. Regardless of the
recommendation, the advisory opinion
will include instructions on specific
corrective action to be taken if the Board
grants the application.
(b) Access to Records. Applicants will
have access to all records considered by
the Board, except those classified or
privileged. To the extent practicable,
applicants will be provided unclassified
or nonprivileged summaries or extracts
of such records considered by the
Board.
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(c) Payment of Expenses. The Air
Force has no authority to pay expenses
of any kind incurred by or on behalf of
an applicant in connection with a
correction of military records under 10
U.S.C. 1034 or 1552.
(d) Form Adopted: DD Form 149.
Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–16338 Filed 7–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–05–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call LCDR Christopher Friese,
Prevention Dept. Chief, Sector Sault
Sainte Marie, 337 Water St, Sault Sainte
Marie, MI 49783; 906–635–3220. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[USCG–2009–0118]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Annual Events
Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain
of the Port Sault Sainte Marie Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishment of safety zones for annual
events in the Captain of the Port Sault
Sainte Marie Zone. This proposed rule
adds events not previously published in
Coast Guard regulations. These safety
zones are necessary to protect
spectators, participants, and vessels
from the hazards associated with
fireworks displays or other events.
DATES: Comments and related materials
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
August 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2009–0118 using one of
the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Jul 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2009–0118),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand delivery or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail address
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG–
2009–0118’’ in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the balloon
shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or handdelivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail
and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material receiving during
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34283
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert USCG–
2009–0118 in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the item in the
Docket ID column. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
C. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of all comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Sault Sainte Marie at
the address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
We propose these safety zones to
control vessel traffic within the
immediate location of the fireworks
launching area during annual fireworks
displays.
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
7 permanent Safety Zones in the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie
zone. These safety zones are necessary
to protect vessels and people from the
hazards associated with fireworks
displays or other events. Such hazards
include obstructions to the waterway
that may cause marine casualties and
the explosive danger of fireworks and
debris falling into the water that may
cause death or serious bodily harm.
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34279-34283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16338]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
32 CFR Part 865
[Docket No. USAF-2008-0002]
RIN 0701-AA74
Personnel Review Boards
AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Air Force is proposing to amend part 865
of Chapter VII, Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, by revising
Subpart A, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records. Subpart
A establishes procedures for the consideration of applications for the
correction of military records and provides guidance to applicants and
others interested in the process. This revision incorporates format
changes and clarifies various minor provisions of the subpart. The
public is invited to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments to the point of contact listed below.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments on or before
September 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or
RIN number and title, by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, OSD Mailroom 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr Algie Walker Jr. at (240) 857-5380,
al.walker@afncr.af.mil
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been determined that 32 CFR part 865 is not a significant
regulatory action. This rule does not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of the
recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
this Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Sec. 202, Pub. L. 104-4)
It has been certified that 32 CFR Part 865 does not contain a
Federal Mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and
Tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
It has been determined that this rule is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it would not, if
promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities.
Public Law 95-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 865 does not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Existing reporting and
recordkeeping requirements approved under OMB Control Number 0704-0003,
Application for Correction of Military Record Under the Provisions of
Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552, will be used.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
It has been certified that 32 CFR Part 865 does not have federalism
implications, as set forth in Executive Order 13132. This rule does not
have substantial direct effects on:
(1) The States;
(2) The relationship between the National Government and the
States; or
(3) The distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 865
Administrative practices and procedures, Military personnel,
Records.
Accordingly, 32 CFR Part 865, Subpart A, is proposed to be revised
to read as follows:
PART 865--PERSONNEL REVIEW BOARDS
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 865 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 1034, 1552.2.
2. Revise Subpart A to read as follows:
Subpart A--Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records
Sec.
865.0 Purpose.
865.1 Setup of the Board.
865.2 Board responsibilities.
865.3 Application procedures.
865.4 Board actions.
865.5 Decision of the Secretary of the Air Force.
865.6 Reconsideration of applications.
865.7 Action after final decision.
865.8 Miscellaneous provisions.
Subpart A--Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records
Sec. 865.0 Purpose.
This subpart sets up procedures for correction of military records
to remedy error or injustice. It tells how to apply for correction of
military records and how the Air Force Board for Correction
[[Page 34280]]
of Military Records (AFBCMR, or the Board) considers applications. It
defines the Board's authority to act on applications. It directs
collecting and maintaining information subject to the Privacy Act of
1974 authorized by 10 U.S.C. 1034 and 1552. System of Records notice
F035 SAFCB A, Military Records Processed by the Air Force Correction
Board, applies.
Sec. 865.1 Setup of the Board.
The AFBCMR operates within the Office of the Secretary of the Air
Force according to 10 U.S.C. 1552. The Board consists of civilians in
the executive part of the Department of the Air Force who are appointed
and serve at the pleasure of the Secretary of the Air Force. Three
members constitute a quorum of the Board.
Sec. 865.2 Board responsibilities.
(a) Considering Applications. The Board considers all individual
applications properly brought before it. In appropriate cases, it
directs correction of military records to remove an error or injustice,
or recommends such correction.
(b) Recommending Action. When an applicant alleges reprisal under
the Military Whistleblowers Protection Act, 10 U.S.C. 1034, the Board
may recommend to the Secretary of the Air Force that disciplinary or
administrative action be taken against those responsible for the
reprisal.
(c) Deciding Cases. The Board normally decides cases on the
evidence of the record. It is not an investigative body. However, the
Board may, in its discretion, hold a hearing or call for additional
evidence or opinions in any case.
Sec. 865. 3 Application procedures.
(a) Who May Apply:
(1) In most cases, the applicant is a member or former member of
the Air Force, since the request is personal to the applicant and
relates to his or her military records.
(2) An applicant with a proper interest may request correction of
another person's military records when that person is incapable of
acting on his or her own behalf, is missing, or is deceased. Depending
on the circumstances, a child, spouse, civilian employee or former
civilian employee, former spouse, parent or other close relative, an
heir, or a legal representative (such as a guardian or executor) of the
member or former member may be able to show a proper interest.
Applicants will send proof of proper interest with the application when
requesting correction of another person's military records. An
application may be returned when proper interest has not been shown.
(3) A member, former member, employee or former employee,
dependent, and current or former spouse may apply to correct a document
or other record of any other military matter that affects them (This
does not include records pertaining to civilian employment matters).
Applicants will send proof of the effect of the document or record upon
them with the application when requesting a correction under this
provision.
(b) Getting Forms. Applicants may get a DD Form 149, ``Application
for Correction of Military Record Under the Provisions of Title 10,
U.S.C., 1552,'' and Air Force Pamphlet 36-2607, Applicants' Guide to
the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR), from:
(1) Any Air Force Military Personnel Flight (MPF) or publications
distribution office.
(2) Most veterans' service organizations.
(3) The Air Force Review Boards Office, SAF/MRBR, 550 C Street
West, Suite 40, Randolph AFB TX 78150-4742.
(4) The AFBCMR, 1535 Command Drive, EE Wing 3rd Floor, Andrews AFB
MD 20762-7002.
(5) Thru the Internet at https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/eforms/dd0149.pdf (DD Form 149) and https://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFPAM36-2607.pdf (Air Force
Pamphlet 36-2607).
(c) Preparation. Before applying, applicants should:
(1) Review Air Force Pamphlet 36-2607.
(2) Discuss their concerns with MPF, finance office, or other
appropriate officials. Errors can often be corrected administratively
without resort to the Board.
(3) Exhaust other available administrative remedies (otherwise the
Board may return the request without considering it).
(d) Submitting the Application. Applicants should complete all
applicable sections of the DD Form 149, including at least:
(1) The name under which the member served.
(2) The member's social security number or Air Force service
number.
(3) The applicant's current mailing address.
(4) The specific records correction being requested.
(5) Proof of proper interest if requesting correction of another
person's records.
(6) The applicant's original signature.
(e) Applicants should mail the original signed DD Form 149 and any
supporting documents to the Air Force address on the back of the form.
(f) Meeting Time Limits. Ordinarily, applicants must file an
application within 3 years after the error or injustice was discovered,
or, with due diligence, should have been discovered. In accordance with
Federal law, time on active duty is not included in the 3 year period.
An application filed later is untimely and may be denied by the Board
on that basis.
(1) The Board may excuse untimely filing in the interest of
justice.
(2) If the application is filed late, applicants should explain why
it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to waive the time
limits.
(g) Stay of Other Proceedings. Applying to the AFBCMR does not stay
other proceedings.
(h) Counsel Representation. Applicants may be represented by
counsel, at their own expense.
(1) The term ``counsel'' includes members in good standing of the
bar of any State, accredited representatives of veterans' organizations
recognized under by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs pursuant to 38
U.S.C. 5902(a)(1), and other persons determined by the Executive
Director of the Board to be competent to represent the interests of the
applicant.
(2) See DoDD 7050.06, Military Whistleblower Protection \1\ and AFI
90-301, Inspector General Complaints Resolution, for special provisions
for counsel in cases processed under 10 U.S.C. 1034.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Available via the Internet at https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/705006p.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Page Limitations on Briefs. Briefs in support of applications:
(1) May not exceed 25 double-spaced typewritten pages.
(2) Must be typed on one side of a page only with not more than 12
characters per inch.
(3) Must be assembled in a manner that permits easy reproduction.
(4) Responses to advisory opinions must not exceed 10 double-spaced
typewritten pages and meet the other requirements for briefs.
(5) These limitations do not apply to supporting documentary
evidence.
(6) In complex cases and upon request, the Executive Director of
the Board may waive these limitations.
(j) Withdrawing Applications. Applicants may withdraw an
application at any time before the Board's decision. Withdrawal does
not stay the 3-year time limit.
[[Page 34281]]
(k) Authority to Reject Applications. The Executive Director may
return an application without action, if, after consultation with legal
counsel, he or she determines that the application is clearly
frivolous, or the remedy that is requested is beyond the authority of
the Board. This authority may not be delegated.
Sec. 865.4 Board actions.
(a) Board Information Sources. The applicant has the burden of
providing sufficient evidence of material error or injustice. However,
the Board:
(1) May get additional information and advisory opinions on an
application from any Air Force organization or official.
(2) May ask the applicant to furnish additional information
regarding matters before the Board.
(b) Applicants will be given an opportunity to review and comment
on advisory opinions and additional information obtained by the Board.
They will also be provided with a copy of correspondence to or from the
Air Force Review Boards Agency with an entity outside the Air Force
Review Boards Agency in accordance with the provisions of 10 U.S.C.
1556.
(c) Consideration by the Board. A panel consisting of at least
three board members considers each application. One panel member serves
as its chair. The panel's actions and decisions constitute the actions
and decisions of the Board.
(d) The panel may decide the case in executive session or authorize
a hearing. When a hearing is authorized, the procedures in Sec.
865.4(f), of this part, apply.
(e) Board Deliberations. Normally only members of the Board and
Board staff will be present during deliberations. The panel chair may
permit observers for training purposes or otherwise in furtherance of
the functions of the Board.
(f) Board Hearings. The Board in its sole discretion determines
whether to grant a hearing. Applicants do not have a right to a hearing
before the Board.
(1) The Executive Director will notify the applicant or counsel, if
any, of the time and place of the hearing. Written notice will be
mailed 30 days in advance of the hearing unless the notice period is
waived by the applicant. The applicant will respond not later than 15
days before the hearing date, accepting or declining the offer of a
hearing and, if accepting, provide information pertaining to counsel
and witnesses. The Board will decide the case in executive session if
the applicant declines the hearing or fails to appear.
(2) When granted a hearing, the applicant may appear before the
Board with or without counsel and may present witnesses. It is the
applicant's responsibility to notify witnesses, arrange for their
attendance at the hearing, and pay any associated costs.
(3) The panel chair conducts the hearing, maintains order, and
ensures the applicant receives a full and fair opportunity to be heard.
Formal rules of evidence do not apply, but the panel observes
reasonable bounds of competency, relevancy, and materiality. Witnesses
other than the applicant will not be present except when testifying.
Witnesses will testify under oath or affirmation. A recorder will
record the proceedings verbatim. The chair will normally limit hearings
to 2 hours but may allow more time if necessary to ensure a full and
fair hearing.
(4) Additional provisions apply to cases processed under 10 U.S.C.
1034. See DoDD 7050.06, Military Whistleblower Protection \2\, and AFI
90-301, Inspector General Complaints Resolution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Copies may be obtained via the Internet at https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/705006p.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(g) The Board will not deny or recommend denial of an application
on the sole ground that the issue already has been decided by the
Secretary of the Air Force or the President of the United States in
another proceeding.
(h) Board Decisions. The panel's majority vote constitutes the
action of the Board. The Board will make determinations on the
following issues in writing:
(1) Whether the provisions of the Military Whistleblowers
Protection Act apply to the application. This determination is needed
only when the applicant invokes the protection of the Act, or when the
question of its applicability is otherwise raised by the evidence.
(2) Whether the application was timely filed and, if not, whether
the applicant has demonstrated that it would be in the interest of
justice to excuse the untimely filing. When the Board determines that
an application is not timely, and does not excuse its untimeliness, the
application will be denied on that basis.
(3) Whether the applicant has exhausted all available and effective
administrative remedies. If the applicant has not, the application will
be denied on that basis.
(4) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the existence of a
material error or injustice that can be remedied effectively through
correction of the applicant's military record and, if so, what
corrections are needed to provide full and effective relief.
(5) In Military Whistleblowers Protection Act cases only, whether
to recommend to the Secretary of the Air Force that disciplinary or
administrative action be taken against any Air Force official whom the
Board finds to have committed an act of reprisal against the applicant.
Any determination on this issue will not be made a part of the Board's
record of proceedings and will not be given to the applicant, but will
be provided directly to the Secretary of the Air Force under separate
cover (Sec 865.2b, of this part).
(i) Record of Proceedings. The Board staff will prepare a record of
proceedings following deliberations which will include:
(1) The name and vote of each Board member.
(2) The application.
(3) Briefs and written arguments.
(4) Documentary evidence.
(5) A hearing transcript if a hearing was held.
(6) Advisory opinions and the applicant's related comments.
(7) The findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Board.
(8) Minority reports, if any.
(9) Other information necessary to show a true and complete history
of the proceedings.
(j) Minority Reports. A dissenting panel member may prepare a
minority report which may address any aspect of the case.
(k) Separate Communications. The Board may send comments or
recommendations to the Secretary of the Air Force as to administrative
or disciplinary action against individuals found to have committed acts
of reprisal prohibited by the Military Whistleblowers Protection Act
and on other matters arising from an application not directly related
to the requested correction of military records. Such comments and
recommendations will be separately communicated and will not be
included in the record of proceedings or given to the applicant or
counsel.
(l) Final Action by the Board. The Board acts for the Secretary of
the Air Force and its decision is final when it:
(1) Denies any application (except under 10 U.S.C. 1034).
(2) Grants any application in whole or part when the relief was
recommended by the official preparing the advisory opinion, was
unanimously agreed to by the panel, and does not affect an appointment
or promotion requiring confirmation by the Senate., and does not affect
a matter for which the
[[Page 34282]]
Secretary of the Air Force or his or her delegee has withheld decision
authority or required notification before final decision.
(3) The Board sends the record of proceedings on all other
applications to the Secretary of the Air Force or his or her designee
for final decision.
(m) The Board may identify DoD or Air Force policies, instructions,
guidance or practices that are leading to, or likely to lead to unsound
business decisions, unfair results, waste of government funds or public
criticism. The Board will forward such observations directly to the
appropriate offices of the Secretariat and/or Air Staff for review and
evaluation. Such observations will not be included in the record of
proceedings.
Sec. 865.5 Decision of the Secretary of the Air Force.
(a) The Secretary may direct such action as he or she deems
appropriate on each case, including returning the case to the Board for
further consideration. Cases returned to the Board for further
reconsideration will be accompanied by a brief statement of the reasons
for such action. If the Secretary does not accept the Board's
recommendation, the Secretary's decision will be in writing and will
include a brief statement of the grounds for his/her final decision.
(b) Decisions in Cases Under the Military Whistleblowers Protection
Act. The Secretary will issue decisions on such cases within 180 days
after receipt of the case and will, unless the full relief requested is
granted, inform applicants of their right to request review of the
decision by the Secretary of Defense (SecDef). Applicants will also be
informed:
(1) Of the name and address of the official to whom the request for
review must be submitted.
(2) That the request for review must be submitted within 90 days
after receipt of the decision by the Secretary of the Air Force.
(3) That the request for review must be in writing and include the
applicant's name, address, and telephone number; a copy of the
application to the AFBCMR and the final decision of the Secretary of
the Air Force; and a statement of the specific reasons the applicant is
not satisfied with the decision of the Secretary of the Air Force.
(4) That the request must be based on the Board record; requests
for review based on factual allegations or evidence not previously
presented to the Board will not be considered under this paragraph but
may be the basis for reconsideration by the Board under Sec. 865.6.
(c) In cases under Sec. 865.5(b) of this part which involve
additional issues not cognizable under that paragraph, the additional
issues may be considered separately by the Board under Sec. 865.3 and
Sec. 865.4 of this part. The special time limit in Sec. 865.5 (b)
does not apply to the decision concerning these additional issues.
(d) Decisions in High Profile or Sensitive Cases. Prior to taking
final action on a BCMR application that has generated, or is likely to
generate, significant public or Congressional interest, the Secretarial
designee will provide the case record of proceedings through
Secretarial channels to OSAF so that the Secretary can determine
whether to decide the case personally or take other action the
Secretary deems appropriate.
Sec. 865.6 Reconsideration of applications.
(a) The Board may reconsider an application if the applicant
submits newly discovered relevant evidence that was not reasonably
available when the application was previously considered. The Executive
Director or Team Chiefs will screen each request for reconsideration to
determine whether it contains new evidence. New arguments about, or
analysis of, evidence already considered, and additional statements
which are cumulative to those already in the record of proceedings will
not be considered new evidence.
(b) If the request contains new evidence, the Executive Director or
his/her designee will refer it to a panel of the Board for a decision.
The Board will decide the relevance and weight of any new evidence,
whether it was reasonably available to the applicant when the
application was previously considered, and whether it was submitted in
a timely manner. The Board may deny reconsideration if the request does
not meet the criteria for reconsideration. Otherwise the Board will
reconsider the application and decide the case either on timeliness or
merit as appropriate.
(c) If the request does not contain new evidence, the Executive
Director or his/her designee will return it to the applicant without
referral to the Board.
Sec. 856.7 Action after final decision.
(a) Action by the Executive Director. The Executive Director or
his/her designee will inform the applicant or counsel, if any, of the
final decision on the application. If any requested relief was denied,
the Executive Director will advise the applicant of reconsideration
procedures and, for cases processed under the Military Whistleblowers
Protection Act, review by the SecDef. The Executive Director will send
decisions requiring corrective action to the Chief of Staff, U.S. Air
Force, for necessary action.
(b) Settlement of Claims. The Air Force is authorized, under 10
U.S.C. 1552, to pay claims for amounts due to applicants as a result of
correction of military records.
(1) The Executive Director will furnish the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service (DFAS) with AFBCMR decisions potentially affecting
monetary entitlement or benefits. DFAS will treat such decisions as
claims for payment by or on behalf of the applicant.
(2) DFAS settles claims on the basis of the corrected military
record. Computation of the amount due, if any, is a function of DFAS.
Applicants may be required to furnish additional information to DFAS to
establish their status as proper parties to the claim and to aid in
deciding amounts due.
(3) Earnings received from civilian employment during any period
for which active duty pay and allowances are payable will be deducted
from the settlement. Amounts found due will be offset by the amount of
any existing indebtedness to the government in compliance with the Debt
Collection Act of 1982 or successor statutes.
(c) Public Access to Decisions. After deletion of personal
information, AFBCMR decisions will be made available for review and
copying at an electronic public reading room.
Sec. 865.8 Miscellaneous provisions.
(a) At the request of the Board, all Air Force activities and
officials will furnish the Board with:
(1) All available military records pertinent to an application.
(2) An advisory opinion concerning an application. The advisory
opinion will include an analysis of the facts of the case and of the
applicant's contentions, a statement of whether or not the requested
relief can be done administratively, and a recommendation on the
timeliness and merit of the request. Regardless of the recommendation,
the advisory opinion will include instructions on specific corrective
action to be taken if the Board grants the application.
(b) Access to Records. Applicants will have access to all records
considered by the Board, except those classified or privileged. To the
extent practicable, applicants will be provided unclassified or
nonprivileged summaries or extracts of such records considered by the
Board.
[[Page 34283]]
(c) Payment of Expenses. The Air Force has no authority to pay
expenses of any kind incurred by or on behalf of an applicant in
connection with a correction of military records under 10 U.S.C. 1034
or 1552.
(d) Form Adopted: DD Form 149.
Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-16338 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P