General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/Off-Road Vehicle Management Plan, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Big Cypress National Preserve Addition, Florida, 34030-34031 [E9-16661]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
34030
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 14, 2009 / Notices
governmental agencies and bona fide
educational and research institutions
may request confidential information
regarding significant caves.
DATES: The OMB is required to respond
to this information collection request
within 60 days but may respond after 30
days. Therefore, written comments
should be received on or before August
13, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
directly to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior (OMB #1004–
0165), Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, fax 202–395–5806,
or by electronic mail at
oira_docket@omb.eop.gov.
Please mail a copy of your comments
to: BLM Information Collection
Clearance Officer (WO–630),
Department of the Interior, 1849 C
Street, NW., Mail Stop 401 LS,
Washington, DC 20240.
You may also send a copy of your
comments by electronic mail to
jean_sonneman@blm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Goodbar, Senior Cave and Karst
Resources Specialist, at 505–234–5929
(Commercial or FTS). You may also
contact Mr. Goodbar to obtain, at no
cost, a copy of the information
collection request.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Cave Management: Cave
Nominations and Confidential
Information (43 CFR part 37).
OMB Number: 1004–0165.
Form Numbers: None.
Abstract: The information covered in
this Information Collection Request
applies to caves on Federal lands
administered by the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), National Park
Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
and Bureau of Reclamation. The BLM
collects information from appropriate
private sector interests, including
‘‘cavers,’’ in order to update a list of
significant caves that are under the
jurisdiction of the agencies listed above.
The BLM also processes requests for
confidential information regarding
significant caves. The information
collected enables the BLM to comply
with the Federal Cave Resources
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 4301–4310).
60-Day Notice: On November 20,
2008, the BLM published a 60-day
notice (73 FR 70364) requesting
comments on the proposed information
collection. The comment period ended
January 20, 2009. No comments were
received.
Current Action: This proposal is being
submitted to extend the expiration date
of July 31, 2009.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:50 Jul 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
Type of Review: 3-year extension.
Affected Public: Individuals and
households.
Obligation to Respond: Voluntary.
Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 90 cave nominations; 10
requests for confidential information.
Estimated Time per Response: 12
hours for cave nominations; 1 hour for
requests for confidential information.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,090 hours.
The BLM may not conduct or sponsor
an information collection, and
respondents are not required to respond
to an information collection, unless the
information collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number. As
part of the approval process, we invite
comments on the following information
collection. Comments should address
one or more of the following points:
(1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
functioning of the BLM, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the BLM’s
estimate of the burden of the
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
(4) How to minimize the information
collection burden on those who are to
respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other forms of
information technology.
Please send comments to the
addresses listed under ADDRESSES.
Please refer to OMB control number
1004–0165 in your correspondence.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Jean Sonneman,
Bureau of Land Management, Acting
Information Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–16550 Filed 7–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
General Management Plan/Wilderness
Study/Off-Road Vehicle Management
Plan, Draft Environmental Impact
Statement, Big Cypress National
Preserve Addition, Florida
AGENCY: National Park Service,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the
General Management Plan/Wilderness
Study/Off-Road Vehicle Management
Plan (DEIS/GMP/WS/ORV Plan), Big
Cypress National Preserve (Preserve)
Addition.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and
National Park Service (NPS) policy in
Director’s Order Number 2 (Park
Planning) and Director’s Order Number
12 (Conservation Planning,
Environmental Impact Analysis, and
Decision-making), the NPS announces
the availability of a DEIS/GMP/WS/ORV
Plan for the Big Cypress National
Preserve Addition, Florida.
The 1991 GMP for the original
Preserve contains no guidance for the
approximately 147,000 acres added to
the Preserve in 1988 by Public Law 100–
301 (the Addition). A GMP is needed to
clearly define resource conditions and
visitor experiences to be achieved in the
Addition.
DATES: There will be a 60-day comment
period beginning with the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
publication of its Notice of Availability
in the Federal Register. Public meetings
will be held during the review period.
The date, time, and location of public
meetings will be announced through the
NPS Planning, Environment, and Public
Comment (PEPC) Web site https://
parkplanning.nps.gov and in a mailed
announcement to be released in the
summer of 2009.
ADDRESSES: The document will be
available for public review and
comment online at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov. A limited
number of CDs and hard copies will be
made available at Preserve headquarters.
You may also request a hard copy or CD
by contacting Big Cypress National
Preserve, 33100 Tamiami Trail East,
Ochopee, Florida 34141–1000;
telephone 239–695–1103.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public
scoping was initiated in the summer of
2001. Public meetings and six
newsletters were used to keep the
public informed and involved
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 14, 2009 / Notices
throughout the planning process for the
Addition. The resulting document
provides a framework for management,
use, and development options for the
Addition by the NPS for the next 15 to
20 years. It describes four management
alternatives for consideration, including
a no-action alternative that continues
current management policies, and the
NPS’s preferred alternative. The three
action alternatives present a range of
ORV opportunities, proposed
wilderness, and visitor facilities. The
document analyzes the environmental
impacts of the alternatives.
The four alternatives (with names as
they appear in the document) are as
follows:
Alternative A: No-Action
Alternative—the continuation of current
management practices and trends. The
enabling legislation would be the longterm document to guide management
and development of the Preserve.
Alternative B: The general theme is to
enable visitor participation in a wide
variety of challenging outdoor
recreational experiences. This
alternative would provide access to up
to 140 miles of sustainable primary ORV
trails, while proposing a relatively small
amount of wilderness. Secondary ORV
trails, as defined in the plan, could be
designated in any of the backcountry
recreation areas, approximately 94,817
acres or 65 percent of the Addition.
Preferred Alternative: The general
theme is to provide a diversity of
frontcountry and backcountry
recreational opportunities, enhance day
use opportunities along road corridors,
and preserve opportunities for selfreliant recreation. This alternative
would provide access to up to 140 miles
of sustainable primary ORV trails, while
proposing a modest amount of
wilderness. Secondary ORV trails, as
defined in the plan, could be designated
only in the ORV trail corridors and
other backcountry recreation areas,
approximately 52,431 acres or 36
percent of the Addition.
Alternative F: The general theme is to
emphasize resource preservation,
restoration, and research while
providing recreational opportunities
with limited facilities and services. This
alternative would provide no ORV
trails. It would propose for wilderness
designation all lands found eligible for
designation in the Wilderness Eligibility
Assessment.
If you wish to comment on the DEIS/
GMP/WS/ORV Plan, you may submit
your comments by any one of several
methods. The preferred method for
submitting comments is via the Internet
at https://parkplanning.nps.gov. If you
do not receive a confirmation from the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:50 Jul 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
system that we have received your
internet message, please contact us
directly at the address above. You may
also mail comments to the Preserve at
the address shown above. Finally, you
may present your comments in person
at the public meetings to be held during
the public review period or at the
address listed above.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will always make
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives of or officials or
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Authority: The authority for publishing
this notice is 40 CFR § 1506.6.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Big
Cypress National Preserve at the address
and telephone number shown above.
The responsible official for this Draft
EIS is the Regional Director, Southeast
Region, NPS, 100 Alabama Street, SW.,
1924 Building, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
Dated: June 30, 2009.
David Vela,
Regional Director, Southeast Region, National
Park Service.
[FR Doc. E9–16661 Filed 7–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–70–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Delta-Mendota Canal/California
Aqueduct Intertie, Alameda County, CA
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(Draft EIS) and notice of public
hearings.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation,
as the National Environmental Policy
Act Federal lead agency, has made
available for public review and
comment the Delta-Mendota Canal/
California Aqueduct Intertie (Intertie)
Draft EIS. The Intertie is a proposed
action in the August 2000 CALFED BayDelta Program Programmatic Record of
Decision. The Intertie Draft EIS
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34031
evaluates constructing and operating a
pipeline connecting the Delta-Mendota
Canal (DMC) and the California
Aqueduct. The purpose of the Proposed
Action is to improve the DMC
conveyance conditions that restrict the
CVP Jones Pumping Plant to less than
its authorized pumping capacity of
4,600 cubic feet per second. The Draft
EIS describes and presents the
environmental effects of the No-Action
Alternative and three action
alternatives. Two public hearings will
be held to receive comments from
agencies, individuals, and organizations
on the Draft EIS.
DATES: Two public hearings have been
scheduled to receive oral or written
comments regarding environmental
effects:
• Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 1 p.m.–3
p.m., Sacramento, CA.
• Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 6
p.m.–8 p.m., Stockton, CA.
The Draft EIS will be available for a
45-day public review and comment
period.
Comments are due by Monday,
August 31, 2009.
ADDRESSES: The public hearings will be
held at the following locations:
• Sacramento, CA—Bureau of
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, Bureau
of Indian Affairs Conference Room W–
2620.
• Stockton, CA—Arnold Rue
Community Center, 5758 Lorraine
Avenue (in Panella Park at Amaretto
Street).
Send written comments on the Draft
EIS to Mr. Louis Moore, Bureau of
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, MP–
700, Sacramento, CA 95825.
Copies of the Draft EIS may be
requested from Mr. Louis Moore, by
writing to Bureau of Reclamation, 2800
Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA 95825; by
calling 916–978–5189 (TDD 916–978–
5608); or by e-mailing
wmoore@usbr.gov. The Draft EIS is also
accessible from the following Web site:
https://www.usbr.gov/mp/nepa/
nepa_projdetails.cfm?Project_ID=1014.
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for locations where copies of the Draft
EIS are available for public review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Louis Moore, Bureau of Reclamation, at
916–978–5189 (TDD 916–978–5608) or
wmoore@usbr.gov.
The Draft
EIS documents the direct, indirect, and
cumulative effects to the physical,
biological, and socioeconomic
environment that may result from the
construction and operation of the
Intertie facilities.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34030-34031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16661]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/Off-Road Vehicle
Management Plan, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Big Cypress
National Preserve Addition, Florida
AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/Off-Road
Vehicle Management Plan (DEIS/GMP/WS/ORV Plan), Big Cypress National
Preserve (Preserve) Addition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 and National Park Service (NPS) policy in Director's
Order Number 2 (Park Planning) and Director's Order Number 12
(Conservation Planning, Environmental Impact Analysis, and Decision-
making), the NPS announces the availability of a DEIS/GMP/WS/ORV Plan
for the Big Cypress National Preserve Addition, Florida.
The 1991 GMP for the original Preserve contains no guidance for the
approximately 147,000 acres added to the Preserve in 1988 by Public Law
100-301 (the Addition). A GMP is needed to clearly define resource
conditions and visitor experiences to be achieved in the Addition.
DATES: There will be a 60-day comment period beginning with the
Environmental Protection Agency's publication of its Notice of
Availability in the Federal Register. Public meetings will be held
during the review period. The date, time, and location of public
meetings will be announced through the NPS Planning, Environment, and
Public Comment (PEPC) Web site https://parkplanning.nps.gov and in a
mailed announcement to be released in the summer of 2009.
ADDRESSES: The document will be available for public review and comment
online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov. A limited number of CDs and hard
copies will be made available at Preserve headquarters. You may also
request a hard copy or CD by contacting Big Cypress National Preserve,
33100 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, Florida 34141-1000; telephone 239-
695-1103.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public scoping was initiated in the summer
of 2001. Public meetings and six newsletters were used to keep the
public informed and involved
[[Page 34031]]
throughout the planning process for the Addition. The resulting
document provides a framework for management, use, and development
options for the Addition by the NPS for the next 15 to 20 years. It
describes four management alternatives for consideration, including a
no-action alternative that continues current management policies, and
the NPS's preferred alternative. The three action alternatives present
a range of ORV opportunities, proposed wilderness, and visitor
facilities. The document analyzes the environmental impacts of the
alternatives.
The four alternatives (with names as they appear in the document)
are as follows:
Alternative A: No-Action Alternative--the continuation of current
management practices and trends. The enabling legislation would be the
long-term document to guide management and development of the Preserve.
Alternative B: The general theme is to enable visitor participation
in a wide variety of challenging outdoor recreational experiences. This
alternative would provide access to up to 140 miles of sustainable
primary ORV trails, while proposing a relatively small amount of
wilderness. Secondary ORV trails, as defined in the plan, could be
designated in any of the backcountry recreation areas, approximately
94,817 acres or 65 percent of the Addition.
Preferred Alternative: The general theme is to provide a diversity
of frontcountry and backcountry recreational opportunities, enhance day
use opportunities along road corridors, and preserve opportunities for
self-reliant recreation. This alternative would provide access to up to
140 miles of sustainable primary ORV trails, while proposing a modest
amount of wilderness. Secondary ORV trails, as defined in the plan,
could be designated only in the ORV trail corridors and other
backcountry recreation areas, approximately 52,431 acres or 36 percent
of the Addition.
Alternative F: The general theme is to emphasize resource
preservation, restoration, and research while providing recreational
opportunities with limited facilities and services. This alternative
would provide no ORV trails. It would propose for wilderness
designation all lands found eligible for designation in the Wilderness
Eligibility Assessment.
If you wish to comment on the DEIS/GMP/WS/ORV Plan, you may submit
your comments by any one of several methods. The preferred method for
submitting comments is via the Internet at https://parkplanning.nps.gov.
If you do not receive a confirmation from the system that we have
received your internet message, please contact us directly at the
address above. You may also mail comments to the Preserve at the
address shown above. Finally, you may present your comments in person
at the public meetings to be held during the public review period or at
the address listed above.
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. We will always make submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as
representatives of or officials or organizations or businesses,
available for public inspection in their entirety.
Authority: The authority for publishing this notice is 40 CFR
Sec. 1506.6.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Big Cypress National Preserve at the
address and telephone number shown above.
The responsible official for this Draft EIS is the Regional
Director, Southeast Region, NPS, 100 Alabama Street, SW., 1924
Building, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
Dated: June 30, 2009.
David Vela,
Regional Director, Southeast Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. E9-16661 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P