Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, 33384-33388 [E9-16482]
Download as PDF
33384
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 132 / Monday, July 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
35°07′00″ N.; long. 116°34′03″ W.; to
point of beginning. Excluding the
airspace below 3,000 feet AGL within a
3NM radius of the town of Baker, CA
(lat. 35°16′00″ N. long. 116°04′33″ W.;)
and R2502A.
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment
to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 73 to establish Restricted
Areas R–2502A at Fort Irwin, CA. The
U.S. Army has requested this restricted
area because the existing special use
airspace does not include the airspace
above the expanded land maneuver area
created to support the NTC. This
proposed action is required to ensure a
safe training environment, isolated from
the public, for military air and ground
maneuvers from the surface to the upper
limits of restricted airspace.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1)
Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it proposes to establish restricted area
airspace at Fort Irwin, CA.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subjected to the
appropriate environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:35 Jul 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures, prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73
Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted
areas.
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 73 as
follows:
PART 73—SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 73.25
[Amended]
2. § 73.25 is amended as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
R–2502A Fort Irwin, CA [New]
Boundaries. Beginning at lat.
35°25′48″ N., long. 116°18′48″ W.; to lat.
35°25′30″ N., long. 116°09′46″ W.; to lat.
35°23′15″ N., long. 116°09′47″ W.; to lat.
35°06′54″ N., long. 116°30′17″ W.; to lat.
35°07′00″ N., long. 116°34′03″ W.; to lat.
35°18′45″ N., long. 116°18′48″ W. to
point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. Surface to
16,000 feet MSL.
Time of designation. Continuous.
Controlling agency. FAA, Hi-Desert
TRACON, Edwards, CA.
Using agency. Commander, Fort
Irwin, CA.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 6, 2009.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. E9–16480 Filed 7–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
RIN 1024–AD50
Special Regulations; Areas of the
National Park System
National Park Service, Interior.
Proposed Rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Park Service is
proposing this rule to update its
regulations for managing use of the
Colorado River and adjoining federally
owned lands administered by the
National Park Service within Grand
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Canyon National Park. Changes to the
current rule are necessary to implement
portions of the park’s recently revised
Colorado River Management Plan.
Current regulations govern boat trips on
the Colorado River within the park
upstream from Diamond Creek
(approximately River Mile 226). In
accordance with the new Colorado River
Management Plan, the proposed rule
will apply to the entire Colorado River
within the park, including the reach of
the river downstream from Diamond
Creek to the boundary between the park
and Lake Mead National Recreation
Area (approximately River Mile 277).
DATES: Comments must be received by
September 11, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by Regulatory
Information Number 1024–AD50 (RIN),
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: National Park Service, WASO,
Mike Archer, Chief Ranger, Grand
Canyon National Park, P.O. Box 129,
Grand Canyon, Arizona.
All submissions received must
include the agency name and RIN. For
additional information see ‘‘Public
Participation’’ under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Palma Wilson, Deputy
Superintendent—Operations, Grand
Canyon National Park, P.O. Box 129,
Grand Canyon, Arizona 86023,
Palma_Wilson@nps.gov, (fax) (928) 638–
7815.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description of the Park
Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona,
contains and protects what many people
consider to be the most scenic and
scientifically significant arid-land
canyon in the world. Congress
established the park in the Act of
February 26, 1919, and enlarged its
boundaries in subsequent legislation
enacted in 1926, 1928, and 1975. As
described in the latest such enactment,
the Grand Canyon National Park
Enlargement Act, the park consists of
approximately one million, two
hundred thousand acres of lands,
waters, and interests therein, all as
depicted on a boundary map referenced
in the legislation.
The reach of the Colorado River in the
park provides a unique combination of
thrilling whitewater adventure and
magnificent vistas of a remarkable
geologic landscape, including remote
and intimate side canyons. The 277mile-long river corridor is home to
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 132 / Monday, July 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
unique and abundant natural and
cultural resources, including diverse
wildlife, threatened and endangered
species, archeological sites, caves, and
natural soundscapes. For these reasons,
a river trip through the Grand Canyon
is one of the most sought-after
backcountry experiences in the country,
and nearly 30,000 visitors per year run
the river. In addition, more than 50,000
visitors per year take flat-water
excursions lasting several hours in the
lower gorge on pontoon boats operated
by or for the Hualapai Tribe.
Purposes of the Park
In the Act of February 26, 1919,
Congress dedicated and set apart certain
described lands under the name of the
Grand Canyon National Park ‘‘as a
public park for the benefit and
enjoyment of the people.’’ In the Grand
Canyon National Park Enlargement Act,
Congress recognized ‘‘that the entire
Grand Canyon, from the mouth of the
Paria River to the Grand Wash Cliffs,
including tributary side canyons and
surrounding plateaus, is a natural
feature of national and international
significance.’’ In that act Congress also
recognized the need for ‘‘further
protection and interpretation of the
Grand Canyon in accordance with its
true significance.’’
The park’s General Management Plan,
finalized in 1995, states that as a place
of national and global importance Grand
Canyon National Park is to be managed
to ‘‘preserve and protect its natural and
cultural resources and ecological
processes, as well as its scenic,
aesthetic, and scientific values’’ and to
‘‘provide opportunities for visitors to
experience and understand the
environmental interrelationships,
resources, and values of Grand Canyon
without impairing the resource.’’
The park’s Colorado River
Management Plan was revised (Record
of Decision published in the Federal
Register on March 23, 2006) to address
both long-standing and recent issues
concerning resource protection, visitor
experience, and public services along
the Colorado River corridor; to consider
the impact of National Park Service
river management on federally
recognized American Indian tribes
whose reservations adjoin Grand
Canyon National Park; and to fulfill the
requirements of a 2002 agreement that
settled litigation over the previous river
management plan.
Resource Issues
Nearly 30,000 visitors per year
participate in commercial or
noncommercial river trips on the
Colorado River within Grand Canyon
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:35 Jul 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
National Park. In addition, more than
50,000 visitors per year take flat-water
excursions lasting several hours in the
lower gorge on pontoon boats operated
by or for the Hualapai Tribe.
Recreational activities along the river
corridor in the park may impact the
park’s natural and cultural resources
(including resources possessing
wilderness values), the experiences of
park visitors, park operations, and
adjoining lands owned or administered
by other federal agencies or neighboring
American Indian tribes. Those impacts
are analyzed in depth in Chapter 4 of
the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the recently revised
Colorado River Management Plan.
As currently written, 36 CFR 7.4(b)
governs the use of the Colorado River
within the park upstream from Diamond
Creek (approximately River Mile 226).
This proposed rule would apply to the
entire Colorado River and adjoining
federally owned lands within the park,
including the reach of the river
downstream from Diamond Creek (River
Mile 226) to the boundary between the
park and Lake Mead National
Recreation Area (approximately River
Mile 277). This proposed rule (1) would
clarify that commercial river trips below
Diamond Creek, including those
operated by or for the Hualapai Tribe,
must obtain National Park Service
approval in the form of a permit,
contract, or other written agreement, as
required by 36 CFR 5.3 and other
applicable laws, and (2) would require
that noncommercial river trips using
any part of the Colorado River within
Grand Canyon National Park, including
the river downstream from Diamond
Creek, obtain a permit issued by the
Superintendent. The proposed rule also
would update visitor-use restrictions
and camping closures and delete
unnecessary provisions in the current
regulation.
The Colorado River Management Plan
planning process involved extensive
public scoping beginning in 1997 and
included numerous public meetings and
stakeholder workshops; opportunity for
the public to comment in person or via
email or regular mail; and consultation
with other agencies and culturally
affiliated American Indian tribes.
During the planning process,
approximately 2,000 people attended
public meetings, and the National Park
Service received approximately 24,000
written responses from the public
containing over 90,000 individual
comments. For additional information
see the Purpose of and Need for the
Action, Background Information and
Appendix B: Public Scoping Summary
sections of the Final Environmental
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33385
Impact Statement, which detail the
public scoping process and the issues
and concerns raised in scoping; Volume
II, Chapter 5 of the Final Environmental
Impact Statement, which includes a list
of organizations and agencies consulted
during the planning process; and
Volume III of the Final Environmental
Impact Statement, which includes
responses to all substantive comments
received during the process. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement can be
found on the park’s Web site at https://
www.nps.gov/archive/grca/crmp/ or at
Grand Canyon National Park, 823 N.
San Francisco, Ste A, Flagstaff, AZ
86001.
The National Park Service’s
management of the Colorado River
within Grand Canyon National Park
may affect resources of the Navajo
Nation, the Havasupai Tribe, or the
Hualapai Tribe, each of which shares a
boundary with the park. Furthermore,
the National Park Service’s management
of the Colorado River within the park
will affect businesses operating on the
river under agreements with the
Hualapai Tribe. Potential impacts for
culturally affiliated American Indian
tribes were addressed in the park’s
recently revised Colorado River
Management Plan.
At its request, the Hualapai Tribe
served as a cooperating agency in the
preparation of the Environmental
Impact Statement for the new Colorado
River Management Plan. The final plan
represents agreement between the
National Park Service and the Tribe on
most issues relating to river use in the
park. However, the Tribe’s preferred
alternative for the lower gorge
envisioned even greater pontoon boat
use than the increase authorized by the
final plan. The National Park Service
intends to offer the Tribe a noncompetitive concession contract for its
lower gorge operations in accordance
with the final plan and with the
National Park Service Concessions
Management Improvement Act of 1998
and implementing regulations found in
36 CFR Part 51.
For more information on consultation
and coordination with American Indian
tribes see Chapter 5 of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for the
Colorado River Management Plan. The
Final Environmental Impact Statement
can be found on the park’s Web site at
https://www.nps.gov/archive/grca/crmp/
or at Grand Canyon National Park, 823
N. San Francisco, Ste A, Flagstaff, AZ
86001.
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
33386
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 132 / Monday, July 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
The Draft and Final Environmental
Impact Statements
This rule would implement portions
of Grand Canyon National Park’s
recently revised Colorado River
Management Plan. The National Park
Service prepared a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement and a Final
Environmental Impact Statement. A
Record of Decision was published in the
Federal Register on March 23, 2006.
The planning process began in 1997
with public scoping and stakeholder
workshops. During the process,
approximately 2,000 people attended a
total of 14 public meetings and the NPS
received approximately 24,000 written
responses from the public containing
over 90,000 individual comments.
Impacts associated with this rule are
analyzed in the Final Environmental
Impact Statement for the Colorado River
Management Plan. The Record of
Decision and the Final Environmental
Impact Statement are available on the
park’s Web site at https://www.nps.gov/
archive/grca/crmp/ or at Grand Canyon
National Park, 823 N. San Francisco, Ste
A, Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
Section-by-Section Analysis
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 7.4(b) Colorado River Boat Trips
Section 7.4(b), ‘‘Colorado River boat
trips’’ would amend the existing
regulation, which applies to boat trips
on the Colorado River only between
Lee’s Ferry (River Mile 0) and Diamond
Creek (approximately River Mile 226).
The amended section would apply to all
boat trips on the entire length of the
Colorado River in Grand Canyon
National Park.
Section 7.4(b)(1) would clarify that all
commercial boat trips on the Colorado
River in Grand Canyon National Park
must be authorized by the National Park
Service through a permit, contract, or
other written agreement, as required by
36 CFR 5.3 and other applicable laws.
Section 7.4(b)(2) would require all
noncommercial river trips on the entire
length of the Colorado River in Grand
Canyon National Park to be authorized
under a permit issued by the
Superintendent. Currently section 7.4
only requires permits for
noncommercial river trips from Lee’s
Ferry (River Mile 0) to Diamond Creek
(approximately River Mile 226). This
section would extend the permit
requirement to the entire river within
the park.
Section 7.4(b)(3) would renumber and
clarify the definition of ‘‘commercial’’
river trips and ‘‘noncommercial’’ river
trips. This section is currently found at
7.4(b)(3)(iii).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:35 Jul 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
Section 7.4(b)(4) would create a new
standalone section with language that is
currently found in section 7.4(b)(3) and
that authorizes the Superintendent to
limit the number of permits, contracts
and other written agreements, or amend
the terms and conditions of those
permits, contracts and other written
agreements, to ensure public safety or to
protect park resources.
Section 7.4(b)(5)(i),(ii),(iii), and (iv)
would set out operational conditions
required for all river trips. These
conditions are not new except that they
would apply to the entire length of the
Colorado River within the park. These
four conditions are currently found in
sections 7.4(b)(1) and (2).
Section 7.4(b)(6) would renumber the
section that requires human waste to be
removed from the park in a manner
prescribed by the Superintendent. This
section is currently found at 7.4(b)(4).
Section 7.4(b)(7) would renumber and
update the section that contains
requirements for camp fires currently
found at 7.4(b)(4). This section would
continue to require that fires be kindled
only on beaches and that fires be
completely extinguished with water. It
would add the requirements that fires
must be kindled in elevated metal pans
and that ash and charcoal must be
removed from the park. These
restrictions are currently included in
permit conditions for both commercial
and noncommercial river trips.
Section 7.4(b)(8)(i) through (vii)
would list camping closures that are
currently found at 7.4(b)(9) and would
add camping closures in the following
areas: the Phantom Ranch area, on the
banks of the Colorado River between the
Black Bridge and 0.25 miles below the
mouth of Pipe Creek; the Elves Chasm
drainage from Royal Arch to the
Colorado River; and the Deer Creek
drainage from Deer Creek Falls to the
Colorado River. Section 7.4(b)(8)(vi)
would clarify that the camping closure
at the mouth of Havasu Creek includes
the Havasu Creek drainage from the
boundary between the park and the
Havasupai Indian reservation to the
Colorado River. These areas are heavily
visited by river trips and the closures
would protect resources in the areas by
limiting river trip participants to dayuse only.
The revision of section 7.4(b) would
remove sections 7.4(b)(5), (b)(7), and
(b)(8). Current section 7.4(b)(5) prohibits
pets on river trips. Pets are prohibited
in all areas below the rim of the Grand
Canyon, including the Colorado River
corridor, by the Superintendent under
the authority granted in 36 CFR
2.15(a)(1), making the current section
7.4(b)(5) unnecessary.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Current section 7.4(b)(7) allows
picnicking on beach areas along the
Colorado River. This use is currently
authorized by 36 CFR 2.11, making the
current section 7.4(b)(7) unnecessary.
Current section 7.4(b)(8) allows
swimming and bathing in the waters of
the Colorado River except in locations
immediately above rapids, eddies and
riffles or near rough water. Removing
this section would allow swimming and
bathing in all areas of the Colorado
River, as authorized by 36 CFR 3.16.
The National Park Service expects
swimmers and bathers to take
responsibility for their own safety and
exercise good judgment while using the
waters of the Colorado River.
Compliance With Other Laws
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
This document is a significant rule
and has been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866. We have made
the assessments required by E.O. 12866
and the results are available by writing
to the address in the addresses section
or as supporting material to this
rulemaking found at https://
www.regulations.gov.
(1) This rule would not have an effect
of $100 million or more on the
economy. It would not adversely affect
in a material way the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
local, governments or communities.
However, it may affect the Hualapai
Tribal economy in the future by capping
the number of people who may take flat
water excursions in the lower gorge
operated by or for the Hualapai Tribe.
(2) This rule would not create a
serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency.
(3) This rule does not alter the
budgetary effects of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights
or obligations of their recipients.
(4) OMB has determined that this rule
raises novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this document would not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–12 (2000)).
A qualitative regulatory flexibility
analysis was published on January 11,
2008, using data from a cost-benefit
analysis prepared for the river
management plan. The analysis showed
a net benefit of $2.9 million to the
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 132 / Monday, July 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
regional economy and an increase of 47
jobs for the area above Diamond Creek.
For the area on the Colorado River
below Diamond Creek the result was a
predicted major beneficial economic
impact on Hualapai tribal revenue, and
a negligible impact on the regional
economy.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. subsection 804(2) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year.
Except as described elsewhere with
respect to the Hualapai Tribe, the rule
does not have a significant or unique
effect on State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, this rule does not have
significant takings implications.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This rule meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of the executive order.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulation does not require
information collection from 10 or more
parties and a submission under the
Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required. An OMB form 83–I is not
required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule would implement portions
of the recently revised Colorado River
Management Plan. All impacts
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:35 Jul 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
associated with this rule are fully
analyzed in the Final Environmental
Impact Statement for the Colorado River
Management Plan. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement is
available on the park’s Web site at
https://www.nps.gov/archive/grca/crmp/
or at Grand Canyon National Park, 823
N. San Francisco, Ste A, Flagstaff, AZ
86001.
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
The National Park Service’s
management of the Colorado River
within Grand Canyon National Park
may affect the resources of the Navajo
Nation, the Havasupai Tribe, and the
Hualapai Tribe, each of which shares a
boundary with the park, and historic
properties in the park to which those
and other tribes might attach religious
and cultural significance. Therefore, in
accordance with the provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act; the
National Historic Preservation Act; the
April 29, 1994, Presidential
Memorandum on Government-toGovernment Relations with Native
American Tribal Governments;
Executive Order 13007, 3 CFR 196
(1997); Executive Order 13175, 3 CFR
part 304 (2001); 512 Department of
Interior Manual 2; National Park Service
Management Policies 2001 and 2006;
and National Park Service Director’s
Order #71: Relationship with Indian
Tribes, the National Park Service
established regular consultation with
culturally affiliated, federally
recognized American Indian tribes
during the revision of the Colorado
River Management Plan to try to
understand and address tribal issues
and concerns. For a list of American
Indian tribes consulted and a
description of the process and issues
identified during the process, see
Chapter 5 of the Final Environmental
Impact Statement for the Colorado River
Management Plan. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement can be
found on the park’s Web site at https://
www.nps.gov/archive/grca/crmp/ or at
Grand Canyon National Park, 823 N.
San Francisco, Ste A, Flagstaff, AZ
86001.
Clarity of Rule
Executive Order 12866 requires each
agency to write regulations that are easy
to understand. We invite your
comments on how to make this rule
easier to understand, including answers
to questions such as the following: (1)
Are the requirements in the rule clearly
stated? (2) Does the rule contain
technical language or jargon that
interferes with its clarity? (3) Does the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33387
format of the rule (grouping and order
of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its
clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to
read if it were divided into more (but
shorter) sections? (A ‘‘section’’ appears
in bold type and is preceded by the
symbol ‘‘§’’ and a numbered heading;
for example § 7.XX * * *) (5) Is the
description of the rule in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
the preamble helpful in understanding
the proposed rule? What else could we
do to make the rule easier to
understand?
Send a copy of any comments that
concern how we could make this rule
easier to understand to: Office of
Regulatory Affairs, Department of the
Interior, Room 7229, 1849 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20240. You may
also email the comments to this address:
Exsec@ios.doi.gov.
Drafting Information: The principal
contributors to this proposed rule are:
Chris Pergiel, Alaska Regional Chief
Ranger; Robin Martin, Program Analyst,
Grand Canyon National Park; and Jerry
Case, Superintendent, Bighorn Canyon
National Recreation Area.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National Parks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
National Park Service proposes to
amend 36 CFR part 7 as follows:
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
SYSTEM
1. The authority for part 7 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 460(q),
462(k); Sec. 7.96 also issued under DC Code
8–137(1981) and DC Code 40–721 (1981).
2. In § 7.4, paragraph (b) is revised as
follows:
§ 7.4
Grand Canyon National Park.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Colorado River boat trips. The
following applies to all persons using
the waters of the Colorado River, or
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
33388
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 132 / Monday, July 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
federally owned lands administered by
the National Park Service along the
river, within Grand Canyon National
Park:
(1) Commercial use of the Colorado
River within Grand Canyon National
Park must be authorized by the National
Park Service through a permit, contract,
or other written agreement. Each
commercial river trip must designate a
trip leader who is responsible for
ensuring that all trip participants
comply with the terms and conditions
of the authorizing instrument.
(2) Noncommercial use of the
Colorado River within Grand Canyon
National Park, including research by
any agency, entity, or person except the
National Park Service, must be
authorized by a permit issued by the
Superintendent. The permit holder is
deemed to be the trip leader and is
responsible for ensuring that all trip
participants comply with the terms and
conditions of the permit.
(3) A river trip is commercial if any
participant receives money or other
compensation for organizing, outfitting,
or guiding the trip. A river trip is
noncommercial if:
(i) There is a bona fide sharing of
expenses among trip participants; and
(ii) No participant receives any money
or other compensation for organizing,
outfitting, or guiding the trip.
(4) At any time the Superintendent
may limit the number of permits,
contracts, and other written agreements
issued or may amend the terms and
conditions of those permits, contracts,
and other written agreements to ensure
public safety or to protect park
resources.
(5) From Lees Ferry (River Mile 0) to
Separation Canyon (approximately
River Mile 239.5):
(i) No one may operate a vessel
engaging in predominately upstream
travel;
(ii) No one may operate a vessel
powered by a motor or motors whose
total horsepower exceeds 55;
(iii) Every person aboard a vessel
must wear a personal floatation device
approved by the United States Coast
Guard for the specific activity in which
the person is engaged; and
(iv) One additional personal floatation
device must be carried on each vessel
for every ten persons on board.
(6) All solid human waste must be
removed from the park and disposed of
in the manner prescribed by the
Superintendent.
(7) Fire may be kindled only on
beaches in an elevated metal fire pan
that contains the fire. All fires must be
completely extinguished with water
before the river trip participants leave
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:35 Jul 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
the area. All ash and charcoal must be
removed from the park.
(8) The following areas are closed to
camping:
(i) The banks of the Colorado River
from the mouth of the Paria River to
Navajo Bridge;
(ii) Red Wall Cavern;
(iii) The banks of the Colorado River
from the Black Bridge to 0.25 miles
below the mouth of Pipe Creek;
(iv) The Elves Chasm drainage from
Royal Arch to the Colorado River;
(v) The Deer Creek drainage from Deer
Creek Falls to the Colorado River;
(vi) The Havasu Creek drainage from
the boundary between the park and the
Havasupai Indian reservation to the
Colorado River; and
(vii) Any other areas closed to
camping by the Superintendent.
(9) The Superintendent may
temporarily limit, restrict, or terminate
access to or use of areas after taking into
consideration public health and safety,
natural and cultural resource protection,
and other management activities and
objectives.
*
*
*
*
*
Will Shafroth,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Fish and Wildlife
and Parks.
[FR Doc. E9–16482 Filed 7–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–ED–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Parts 3001 and 3004
[Docket No. RM2009–6; Order No. 230]
Freedom of Information Act
Regulations
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commission is proposing
to revise rules related to the Freedom of
Information Act. The proposed revisions
implement recent amendments, clarify
the relationship of these rules to others,
and make minor editorial and
conforming changes.
DATES: Initial comments due: August 12,
2009; reply comments due August 27,
2009.
Submit comment
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
II. Discussion of the Proposed Rules
III. Section-by-Section Analysis of Changes
IV. Public Representative
V. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
The Postal Regulatory Commission
(Commission) proposes to update its
rules governing Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, requests. The
Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our
National Government Act of 2007,
Public Law 110–175, 121 Stat. 2524
(OPEN Government Act) was signed
into law on December 31, 2007 and
amends 5 U.S.C. 552. The amendments
require an update to the Commission’s
FOIA rules published in 39 CFR part
3004.
On January 21, 2009, President
Obama issued a memorandum for the
heads of all Federal agencies and
departments directing a presumption of
disclosure for all decisions involving
FOIA.1 At the direction of the President,
the Attorney General issued a
memorandum for the heads of all
Federal agencies and departments
which instructs agencies to use ‘‘a
presumption of openness’’ and take
proactive steps to publicly post
information online in advance of any
request.2
As a result of amendments to 5 U.S.C.
552, policy memoranda from the
President and Attorney General, and
changes to the regulatory framework
and organization under the Postal
Accountability and Enhancement Act
(PAEA), Public Law 109–435, 120 Stat.
3198 (2006), the Commission proposes
to amend its FOIA rules in 39 CFR part
3004.
II. Discussion of the Proposed Rules
The Commission proposes to
implement the OPEN Government Act
with modifications to its FOIA rules in
39 CFR part 3004. First, the Commission
adds proposed rule 3004.42, which
provides each person making a FOIA
request with a unique tracking number,
and a mechanism to track the status of
a FOIA request. Second, the
Commission adds a paragraph to the
section governing fees charged for
requests. Proposed rule 3004.52(e) is
added to reflect a change in the statute
that does not allow an agency to collect
fees if it fails to meet applicable time
limits imposed by the statute. Third, the
Commission adds proposed rule
3004.60, which designates the Director
1 Memorandum for the Heads of Executive
Departments and Agencies, January 21, 2009 (74 FR
4683 (January 26, 2009)).
2 Office of the Attorney General, Memorandum
for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies,
March 19, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33384-33388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16482]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
RIN 1024-AD50
Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service is proposing this rule to update its
regulations for managing use of the Colorado River and adjoining
federally owned lands administered by the National Park Service within
Grand Canyon National Park. Changes to the current rule are necessary
to implement portions of the park's recently revised Colorado River
Management Plan. Current regulations govern boat trips on the Colorado
River within the park upstream from Diamond Creek (approximately River
Mile 226). In accordance with the new Colorado River Management Plan,
the proposed rule will apply to the entire Colorado River within the
park, including the reach of the river downstream from Diamond Creek to
the boundary between the park and Lake Mead National Recreation Area
(approximately River Mile 277).
DATES: Comments must be received by September 11, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by Regulatory
Information Number 1024-AD50 (RIN), by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: National Park Service, WASO, Mike Archer, Chief
Ranger, Grand Canyon National Park, P.O. Box 129, Grand Canyon,
Arizona.
All submissions received must include the agency name and RIN. For
additional information see ``Public Participation'' under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Palma Wilson, Deputy Superintendent--
Operations, Grand Canyon National Park, P.O. Box 129, Grand Canyon,
Arizona 86023, Palma_Wilson@nps.gov, (fax) (928) 638-7815.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description of the Park
Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, contains and protects what
many people consider to be the most scenic and scientifically
significant arid-land canyon in the world. Congress established the
park in the Act of February 26, 1919, and enlarged its boundaries in
subsequent legislation enacted in 1926, 1928, and 1975. As described in
the latest such enactment, the Grand Canyon National Park Enlargement
Act, the park consists of approximately one million, two hundred
thousand acres of lands, waters, and interests therein, all as depicted
on a boundary map referenced in the legislation.
The reach of the Colorado River in the park provides a unique
combination of thrilling whitewater adventure and magnificent vistas of
a remarkable geologic landscape, including remote and intimate side
canyons. The 277-mile-long river corridor is home to
[[Page 33385]]
unique and abundant natural and cultural resources, including diverse
wildlife, threatened and endangered species, archeological sites,
caves, and natural soundscapes. For these reasons, a river trip through
the Grand Canyon is one of the most sought-after backcountry
experiences in the country, and nearly 30,000 visitors per year run the
river. In addition, more than 50,000 visitors per year take flat-water
excursions lasting several hours in the lower gorge on pontoon boats
operated by or for the Hualapai Tribe.
Purposes of the Park
In the Act of February 26, 1919, Congress dedicated and set apart
certain described lands under the name of the Grand Canyon National
Park ``as a public park for the benefit and enjoyment of the people.''
In the Grand Canyon National Park Enlargement Act, Congress recognized
``that the entire Grand Canyon, from the mouth of the Paria River to
the Grand Wash Cliffs, including tributary side canyons and surrounding
plateaus, is a natural feature of national and international
significance.'' In that act Congress also recognized the need for
``further protection and interpretation of the Grand Canyon in
accordance with its true significance.''
The park's General Management Plan, finalized in 1995, states that
as a place of national and global importance Grand Canyon National Park
is to be managed to ``preserve and protect its natural and cultural
resources and ecological processes, as well as its scenic, aesthetic,
and scientific values'' and to ``provide opportunities for visitors to
experience and understand the environmental interrelationships,
resources, and values of Grand Canyon without impairing the resource.''
The park's Colorado River Management Plan was revised (Record of
Decision published in the Federal Register on March 23, 2006) to
address both long-standing and recent issues concerning resource
protection, visitor experience, and public services along the Colorado
River corridor; to consider the impact of National Park Service river
management on federally recognized American Indian tribes whose
reservations adjoin Grand Canyon National Park; and to fulfill the
requirements of a 2002 agreement that settled litigation over the
previous river management plan.
Resource Issues
Nearly 30,000 visitors per year participate in commercial or
noncommercial river trips on the Colorado River within Grand Canyon
National Park. In addition, more than 50,000 visitors per year take
flat-water excursions lasting several hours in the lower gorge on
pontoon boats operated by or for the Hualapai Tribe. Recreational
activities along the river corridor in the park may impact the park's
natural and cultural resources (including resources possessing
wilderness values), the experiences of park visitors, park operations,
and adjoining lands owned or administered by other federal agencies or
neighboring American Indian tribes. Those impacts are analyzed in depth
in Chapter 4 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the
recently revised Colorado River Management Plan.
As currently written, 36 CFR 7.4(b) governs the use of the Colorado
River within the park upstream from Diamond Creek (approximately River
Mile 226). This proposed rule would apply to the entire Colorado River
and adjoining federally owned lands within the park, including the
reach of the river downstream from Diamond Creek (River Mile 226) to
the boundary between the park and Lake Mead National Recreation Area
(approximately River Mile 277). This proposed rule (1) would clarify
that commercial river trips below Diamond Creek, including those
operated by or for the Hualapai Tribe, must obtain National Park
Service approval in the form of a permit, contract, or other written
agreement, as required by 36 CFR 5.3 and other applicable laws, and (2)
would require that noncommercial river trips using any part of the
Colorado River within Grand Canyon National Park, including the river
downstream from Diamond Creek, obtain a permit issued by the
Superintendent. The proposed rule also would update visitor-use
restrictions and camping closures and delete unnecessary provisions in
the current regulation.
The Colorado River Management Plan planning process involved
extensive public scoping beginning in 1997 and included numerous public
meetings and stakeholder workshops; opportunity for the public to
comment in person or via email or regular mail; and consultation with
other agencies and culturally affiliated American Indian tribes. During
the planning process, approximately 2,000 people attended public
meetings, and the National Park Service received approximately 24,000
written responses from the public containing over 90,000 individual
comments. For additional information see the Purpose of and Need for
the Action, Background Information and Appendix B: Public Scoping
Summary sections of the Final Environmental Impact Statement, which
detail the public scoping process and the issues and concerns raised in
scoping; Volume II, Chapter 5 of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement, which includes a list of organizations and agencies
consulted during the planning process; and Volume III of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement, which includes responses to all
substantive comments received during the process. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement can be found on the park's Web site at
https://www.nps.gov/archive/grca/crmp/ or at Grand Canyon National Park,
823 N. San Francisco, Ste A, Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
The National Park Service's management of the Colorado River within
Grand Canyon National Park may affect resources of the Navajo Nation,
the Havasupai Tribe, or the Hualapai Tribe, each of which shares a
boundary with the park. Furthermore, the National Park Service's
management of the Colorado River within the park will affect businesses
operating on the river under agreements with the Hualapai Tribe.
Potential impacts for culturally affiliated American Indian tribes were
addressed in the park's recently revised Colorado River Management
Plan.
At its request, the Hualapai Tribe served as a cooperating agency
in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement for the new
Colorado River Management Plan. The final plan represents agreement
between the National Park Service and the Tribe on most issues relating
to river use in the park. However, the Tribe's preferred alternative
for the lower gorge envisioned even greater pontoon boat use than the
increase authorized by the final plan. The National Park Service
intends to offer the Tribe a non-competitive concession contract for
its lower gorge operations in accordance with the final plan and with
the National Park Service Concessions Management Improvement Act of
1998 and implementing regulations found in 36 CFR Part 51.
For more information on consultation and coordination with American
Indian tribes see Chapter 5 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement
for the Colorado River Management Plan. The Final Environmental Impact
Statement can be found on the park's Web site at https://www.nps.gov/archive/grca/crmp/ or at Grand Canyon National Park, 823 N. San
Francisco, Ste A, Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
[[Page 33386]]
The Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements
This rule would implement portions of Grand Canyon National Park's
recently revised Colorado River Management Plan. The National Park
Service prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and a Final
Environmental Impact Statement. A Record of Decision was published in
the Federal Register on March 23, 2006. The planning process began in
1997 with public scoping and stakeholder workshops. During the process,
approximately 2,000 people attended a total of 14 public meetings and
the NPS received approximately 24,000 written responses from the public
containing over 90,000 individual comments. Impacts associated with
this rule are analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for
the Colorado River Management Plan. The Record of Decision and the
Final Environmental Impact Statement are available on the park's Web
site at https://www.nps.gov/archive/grca/crmp/ or at Grand Canyon
National Park, 823 N. San Francisco, Ste A, Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 7.4(b) Colorado River Boat Trips
Section 7.4(b), ``Colorado River boat trips'' would amend the
existing regulation, which applies to boat trips on the Colorado River
only between Lee's Ferry (River Mile 0) and Diamond Creek
(approximately River Mile 226). The amended section would apply to all
boat trips on the entire length of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon
National Park.
Section 7.4(b)(1) would clarify that all commercial boat trips on
the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park must be authorized by
the National Park Service through a permit, contract, or other written
agreement, as required by 36 CFR 5.3 and other applicable laws.
Section 7.4(b)(2) would require all noncommercial river trips on
the entire length of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park
to be authorized under a permit issued by the Superintendent. Currently
section 7.4 only requires permits for noncommercial river trips from
Lee's Ferry (River Mile 0) to Diamond Creek (approximately River Mile
226). This section would extend the permit requirement to the entire
river within the park.
Section 7.4(b)(3) would renumber and clarify the definition of
``commercial'' river trips and ``noncommercial'' river trips. This
section is currently found at 7.4(b)(3)(iii).
Section 7.4(b)(4) would create a new standalone section with
language that is currently found in section 7.4(b)(3) and that
authorizes the Superintendent to limit the number of permits, contracts
and other written agreements, or amend the terms and conditions of
those permits, contracts and other written agreements, to ensure public
safety or to protect park resources.
Section 7.4(b)(5)(i),(ii),(iii), and (iv) would set out operational
conditions required for all river trips. These conditions are not new
except that they would apply to the entire length of the Colorado River
within the park. These four conditions are currently found in sections
7.4(b)(1) and (2).
Section 7.4(b)(6) would renumber the section that requires human
waste to be removed from the park in a manner prescribed by the
Superintendent. This section is currently found at 7.4(b)(4).
Section 7.4(b)(7) would renumber and update the section that
contains requirements for camp fires currently found at 7.4(b)(4). This
section would continue to require that fires be kindled only on beaches
and that fires be completely extinguished with water. It would add the
requirements that fires must be kindled in elevated metal pans and that
ash and charcoal must be removed from the park. These restrictions are
currently included in permit conditions for both commercial and
noncommercial river trips.
Section 7.4(b)(8)(i) through (vii) would list camping closures that
are currently found at 7.4(b)(9) and would add camping closures in the
following areas: the Phantom Ranch area, on the banks of the Colorado
River between the Black Bridge and 0.25 miles below the mouth of Pipe
Creek; the Elves Chasm drainage from Royal Arch to the Colorado River;
and the Deer Creek drainage from Deer Creek Falls to the Colorado
River. Section 7.4(b)(8)(vi) would clarify that the camping closure at
the mouth of Havasu Creek includes the Havasu Creek drainage from the
boundary between the park and the Havasupai Indian reservation to the
Colorado River. These areas are heavily visited by river trips and the
closures would protect resources in the areas by limiting river trip
participants to day-use only.
The revision of section 7.4(b) would remove sections 7.4(b)(5),
(b)(7), and (b)(8). Current section 7.4(b)(5) prohibits pets on river
trips. Pets are prohibited in all areas below the rim of the Grand
Canyon, including the Colorado River corridor, by the Superintendent
under the authority granted in 36 CFR 2.15(a)(1), making the current
section 7.4(b)(5) unnecessary.
Current section 7.4(b)(7) allows picnicking on beach areas along
the Colorado River. This use is currently authorized by 36 CFR 2.11,
making the current section 7.4(b)(7) unnecessary.
Current section 7.4(b)(8) allows swimming and bathing in the waters
of the Colorado River except in locations immediately above rapids,
eddies and riffles or near rough water. Removing this section would
allow swimming and bathing in all areas of the Colorado River, as
authorized by 36 CFR 3.16. The National Park Service expects swimmers
and bathers to take responsibility for their own safety and exercise
good judgment while using the waters of the Colorado River.
Compliance With Other Laws
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
This document is a significant rule and has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866. We have
made the assessments required by E.O. 12866 and the results are
available by writing to the address in the addresses section or as
supporting material to this rulemaking found at https://www.regulations.gov.
(1) This rule would not have an effect of $100 million or more on
the economy. It would not adversely affect in a material way the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or local, governments or communities. However, it may
affect the Hualapai Tribal economy in the future by capping the number
of people who may take flat water excursions in the lower gorge
operated by or for the Hualapai Tribe.
(2) This rule would not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency.
(3) This rule does not alter the budgetary effects of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or obligations of
their recipients.
(4) OMB has determined that this rule raises novel legal or policy
issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this document would
not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-12 (2000)).
A qualitative regulatory flexibility analysis was published on
January 11, 2008, using data from a cost-benefit analysis prepared for
the river management plan. The analysis showed a net benefit of $2.9
million to the
[[Page 33387]]
regional economy and an increase of 47 jobs for the area above Diamond
Creek. For the area on the Colorado River below Diamond Creek the
result was a predicted major beneficial economic impact on Hualapai
tribal revenue, and a negligible impact on the regional economy.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. subsection 804(2) of
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. Except as described elsewhere with respect to the Hualapai Tribe,
the rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State, local
or tribal governments or the private sector.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, this rule does not have
significant takings implications.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of the executive order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulation does not require information collection from 10 or
more parties and a submission under the Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required. An OMB form 83-I is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule would implement portions of the recently revised Colorado
River Management Plan. All impacts associated with this rule are fully
analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Colorado
River Management Plan. The Final Environmental Impact Statement is
available on the park's Web site at https://www.nps.gov/archive/grca/crmp/ or at Grand Canyon National Park, 823 N. San Francisco, Ste A,
Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
The National Park Service's management of the Colorado River within
Grand Canyon National Park may affect the resources of the Navajo
Nation, the Havasupai Tribe, and the Hualapai Tribe, each of which
shares a boundary with the park, and historic properties in the park to
which those and other tribes might attach religious and cultural
significance. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act; the National Historic Preservation
Act; the April 29, 1994, Presidential Memorandum on Government-to-
Government Relations with Native American Tribal Governments; Executive
Order 13007, 3 CFR 196 (1997); Executive Order 13175, 3 CFR part 304
(2001); 512 Department of Interior Manual 2; National Park Service
Management Policies 2001 and 2006; and National Park Service Director's
Order 71: Relationship with Indian Tribes, the National Park
Service established regular consultation with culturally affiliated,
federally recognized American Indian tribes during the revision of the
Colorado River Management Plan to try to understand and address tribal
issues and concerns. For a list of American Indian tribes consulted and
a description of the process and issues identified during the process,
see Chapter 5 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the
Colorado River Management Plan. The Final Environmental Impact
Statement can be found on the park's Web site at https://www.nps.gov/archive/grca/crmp/ or at Grand Canyon National Park, 823 N. San
Francisco, Ste A, Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
Clarity of Rule
Executive Order 12866 requires each agency to write regulations
that are easy to understand. We invite your comments on how to make
this rule easier to understand, including answers to questions such as
the following: (1) Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated? (2)
Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that interferes with
its clarity? (3) Does the format of the rule (grouping and order of
sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its
clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to read if it were divided into
more (but shorter) sections? (A ``section'' appears in bold type and is
preceded by the symbol ``Sec. '' and a numbered heading; for example
Sec. 7.XX * * *) (5) Is the description of the rule in the
Supplementary Information section of the preamble helpful in
understanding the proposed rule? What else could we do to make the rule
easier to understand?
Send a copy of any comments that concern how we could make this
rule easier to understand to: Office of Regulatory Affairs, Department
of the Interior, Room 7229, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240.
You may also email the comments to this address: Exsec@ios.doi.gov.
Drafting Information: The principal contributors to this proposed
rule are: Chris Pergiel, Alaska Regional Chief Ranger; Robin Martin,
Program Analyst, Grand Canyon National Park; and Jerry Case,
Superintendent, Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service
proposes to amend 36 CFR part 7 as follows:
PART 7--SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
1. The authority for part 7 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 460(q), 462(k); Sec. 7.96 also
issued under DC Code 8-137(1981) and DC Code 40-721 (1981).
2. In Sec. 7.4, paragraph (b) is revised as follows:
Sec. 7.4 Grand Canyon National Park.
* * * * *
(b) Colorado River boat trips. The following applies to all persons
using the waters of the Colorado River, or
[[Page 33388]]
federally owned lands administered by the National Park Service along
the river, within Grand Canyon National Park:
(1) Commercial use of the Colorado River within Grand Canyon
National Park must be authorized by the National Park Service through a
permit, contract, or other written agreement. Each commercial river
trip must designate a trip leader who is responsible for ensuring that
all trip participants comply with the terms and conditions of the
authorizing instrument.
(2) Noncommercial use of the Colorado River within Grand Canyon
National Park, including research by any agency, entity, or person
except the National Park Service, must be authorized by a permit issued
by the Superintendent. The permit holder is deemed to be the trip
leader and is responsible for ensuring that all trip participants
comply with the terms and conditions of the permit.
(3) A river trip is commercial if any participant receives money or
other compensation for organizing, outfitting, or guiding the trip. A
river trip is noncommercial if:
(i) There is a bona fide sharing of expenses among trip
participants; and
(ii) No participant receives any money or other compensation for
organizing, outfitting, or guiding the trip.
(4) At any time the Superintendent may limit the number of permits,
contracts, and other written agreements issued or may amend the terms
and conditions of those permits, contracts, and other written
agreements to ensure public safety or to protect park resources.
(5) From Lees Ferry (River Mile 0) to Separation Canyon
(approximately River Mile 239.5):
(i) No one may operate a vessel engaging in predominately upstream
travel;
(ii) No one may operate a vessel powered by a motor or motors whose
total horsepower exceeds 55;
(iii) Every person aboard a vessel must wear a personal floatation
device approved by the United States Coast Guard for the specific
activity in which the person is engaged; and
(iv) One additional personal floatation device must be carried on
each vessel for every ten persons on board.
(6) All solid human waste must be removed from the park and
disposed of in the manner prescribed by the Superintendent.
(7) Fire may be kindled only on beaches in an elevated metal fire
pan that contains the fire. All fires must be completely extinguished
with water before the river trip participants leave the area. All ash
and charcoal must be removed from the park.
(8) The following areas are closed to camping:
(i) The banks of the Colorado River from the mouth of the Paria
River to Navajo Bridge;
(ii) Red Wall Cavern;
(iii) The banks of the Colorado River from the Black Bridge to 0.25
miles below the mouth of Pipe Creek;
(iv) The Elves Chasm drainage from Royal Arch to the Colorado
River;
(v) The Deer Creek drainage from Deer Creek Falls to the Colorado
River;
(vi) The Havasu Creek drainage from the boundary between the park
and the Havasupai Indian reservation to the Colorado River; and
(vii) Any other areas closed to camping by the Superintendent.
(9) The Superintendent may temporarily limit, restrict, or
terminate access to or use of areas after taking into consideration
public health and safety, natural and cultural resource protection, and
other management activities and objectives.
* * * * *
Will Shafroth,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E9-16482 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-ED-P