Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; Revisions to the 1-Hour Ozone Plan for the Beaumont/Port Arthur Area: Control of Air Pollution From Volatile Organic Compounds, Nitrogen Compounds, and Reasonably Available Control Technology, 33146-33152 [E9-16270]
Download as PDF
33146
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 131 / Friday, July 10, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
2. Add temporary § 100.120 to read as
follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ 100.120 Fran Schnarr Open Water
Championships, Huntington Bay, New York.
Coast Guard
(a) Regulated area. All navigable
waters of Huntington Bay, NY within
100 yards of the swim race course
consisting of the following points: Start/
Finish at approximate position
40°54′25.8″ N 073°24′28.8″ N, East Turn
at approximate position 40°54′45″ N
073°23′36.6″ N and a West Turn at
approximate position 40°54′31.2″ N
073°25′21″ N.
(b) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
Designated on-scene patrol personnel
means any commissioned, warrant or
petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard
operating Coast Guard vessels who has
been authorized to act on the behalf of
the Captain of the Port Long Island
Sound.
(c) Special local regulations. (1) The
general regulations contained in 33 CFR
§ 100.35 and § 100.40 apply.
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 100.35 of this part, no
person or vessel may enter, transit, or
remain within the regulated area during
the effective period of the regulation
unless they are officially participating in
the Fran Schnarr Open Water Swim
event or are otherwise authorized by the
Captain of the Port Long Island Sound
or the designated on-scene patrol
personnel.
(3) All persons and vessels must
comply with the instructions from the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port Long
Island Sound or the designated on-scene
patrol personnel. The designated onscene patrol personnel may delay,
modify, or cancel the swim event as
conditions or circumstances require.
(4) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast
Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing
light or other means, the operator of the
vessel must proceed as directed.
(5) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter the regulated area may request
permission to enter from the designated
on-scene patrol personnel on VHF–16 or
from the Captain of the Port Long Island
Sound via phone at (203) 468–4401.
(d) Effective Period. This rule is in
effect from 7:15 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on
July 12th, 2009. Notification of the swim
event and enforcement of the special
local regulation will be made via
separate marine broadcasts and
broadcast notice to mariners.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
■
33 CFR Part 117
Dated: June 19, 2009.
Daniel A. Ronan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Long Island Sound.
[FR Doc. E9–16307 Filed 7–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:18 Jul 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0546]
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Annisquam River and Blynman Canal,
Gloucester, MA, Public Event
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast
Guard District, has issued a temporary
deviation from the regulation governing
the operation of the Blynman (SR127)
Bridge across the Blynman Canal at mile
0.0, at Gloucester, Massachusetts. This
deviation is necessary to facilitate the
2009 Gloucester Triathlon. The
deviation allows the bridge to remain in
the closed position during this public
event in the interest of public safety.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
9 a.m. through 11 a.m. on August 9,
2009.
Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2009–
0546 and are available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, selecting the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, inserting USCG–
2009–0546 in the docket ID box,
pressing enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Mr. John McDonald, Project
Officer, First Coast Guard District,
telephone (617) 223–8364,
john.w.mcdonald@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Blynman (SR127) Bridge, across the
Blynman Canal at mile 0.0, at
Gloucester, has a vertical clearance in
the closed position of 7 feet at mean
high water and 16 feet at mean low
water. The existing drawbridge
operation regulations are listed at 33
CFR 117.586.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The waterway supports both
commercial and seasonal recreational
vessel traffic.
Under this deviation the Blynman
(SR127) Bridge may remain in the
closed position from 9 a.m. through 11
a.m. on August 9, 2009, to facilitate a
public event, the 2009 Gloucester
Triathlon. Vessels that can pass under
the closed draws may do so at any time.
This deviation is necessary for public
safety, to facilitate vehicular traffic
management during the 2009 Gloucester
Triathlon.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the bridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: June 23, 2009.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E9–16395 Filed 7–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2005–TX–0005; FRL–8928–
6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Texas;
Revisions to the 1-Hour Ozone Plan for
the Beaumont/Port Arthur Area:
Control of Air Pollution From Volatile
Organic Compounds, Nitrogen
Compounds, and Reasonably
Available Control Technology
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is approving part of two
Beaumont-Port Arthur (BPA) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions that
were submitted separately by the State
of Texas on October 15, 2005. The
revisions being approved pertain to
volatile organic compound (VOC)
control requirements for batch
processing and ship building and ship
repair, and also to Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT)
requirements, for the Beaumont/Port
Arthur (BPA) 1-hour ozone serious
nonattainment area. In today’s action,
EPA is approving: The State’s changes
to the batch process rules and the
shipbuilding and ship repair rules that
lower the threshold for affected sources
of VOC emissions to the serious area
requirements of 50 tons per year (tpy),
E:\FR\FM\10JYR1.SGM
10JYR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 131 / Friday, July 10, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
and the State’s demonstration that the
BPA area meets RACT requirements for
sources of VOC and NOX emissions for
the 1-hour ozone standard. These
revisions meet statutory and regulatory
requirements, and are consistent with
EPA’s guidance. The EPA is approving
these revisions pursuant to section 110
and part D of the Federal Clean Air Act
(the Act).
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective September 8, 2009 without
further notice, unless EPA receives
relevant adverse comments by August
10, 2009. If EPA receives such comment,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that this
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2005–TX–0005, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• EPA Region 6 ‘‘Contact Us’’ Web
site: https://epa.gov/region6/
r6coment.htm. Please click on ‘‘6PD’’
(Multimedia) and select ‘‘Air’’ before
submitting comments.
• E-mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson at
donaldson.guy@epa.gov. Please also
send a copy by e-mail to the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section below.
• Fax: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD–L), at fax
number 214–665–7263.
• Mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief,
Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733.
• Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Guy
Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Such
deliveries are accepted only between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays
except for legal holidays. Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R06–OAR–2005–
TX–0005. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:18 Jul 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733. The file will be made
available by appointment for public
inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review
Room between the hours of 8:30 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal
holidays. Contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
214–665–7253 to make an appointment.
If possible, please make the
appointment at least two working days
in advance of your visit. There will be
a 15 cent per page fee for making
photocopies of documents. On the day
of the visit, please check in at the EPA
Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
The State submittal is also available
for public inspection at the State Air
Agency listed below during official
business hours by appointment: Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality
(TCEQ), Office of Air Quality, 12124
Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas 78753.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33147
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Belk, Air Planning Section (6PD–
L), Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, telephone
(214) 665–2164; fax number 214–665–
7263; e-mail address
belk.ellen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
II. Control of VOC Emissions for Batch
Processes and Shipbuilding and Ship
Repair
1. What Has the State Submitted?
2. What Are the Requirements of Texas’
Regulation for Control of VOCs?
3. Why Is EPA Approving Texas’
Regulation for Control of VOCs?
III. Reasonably Available Control Technology
(RACT) for the 1-hr Ozone BPA Area
1. VOC RACT
2. NOX RACT
IV. What Is the Process for EPA To Approve
This SIP Revision?
V. Final Action
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
We are approving parts of two State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
containing VOC controls submitted by
the State of Texas pertaining to the BPA
1-hour ozone serious nonattainment
area, as well as the State’s
demonstration that the BPA area meets
RACT requirements for sources of VOC
and NOX emissions for the 1-hour ozone
standard. Specifically, the revisions to
the batch process rules and shipbuilding
and ship repair rules lower VOC
emission exemption levels for batch
process operations and shipbuilding
and ship repair operations in the BPA
area from 100 tpy to 50 tpy to reflect the
classification status of the BPA area as
serious under the 1-hour standard,
revising sections 115.167, 115.169,
115.427, and 115.429 of Title 30 of the
Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 115
(30 TAC 115). The SIP revisions being
approved today also include a
demonstration that the BPA area meets
the RACT requirements for VOC and
NOX for a serious 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area. RACT is the lowest
emission limit that a particular source is
capable of meeting by the application of
the control technology that is reasonably
available considering technological and
economic feasibility. RACT
requirements for ozone nonattainment
areas can be found in section 182 of the
Act. For its RACT demonstration, the
State relies upon previously approved
VOC and NOX SIP rules (e.g., 65 FR
E:\FR\FM\10JYR1.SGM
10JYR1
33148
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 131 / Friday, July 10, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
64148, October 26, 2000), as well as the
VOC rule changes for batch process and
shipbuilding and ship repair being
approved in this action. EPA is finding
that the BPA 1-hour ozone serious
nonattainment area meets the RACT
requirements for VOCs and NOX.
II. Control of VOC Emissions in Batch
Processes and Shipbuilding and Ship
Repair
1. What Has the State Submitted?
This action addresses part of two
Texas submittals for Control of VOCs.
The first submittal, entitled
‘‘Concerning Revisions to 30 TAC
Chapter 115 Control of Air Pollution
from Volatile Organic Compounds’’ was
adopted September 9, 2005, by the State
of Texas and submitted to EPA for
approval as a SIP revision on October
15, 2005. This submittal included the
following: (1) Revising VOC control
requirements for the following source
categories in the BPA area to meet the
serious area VOC RACT requirements:
Shipbuilding and Ship Repair, and
Batch Processes, and (2) removing a
contingency measure requirement for
controls for loading and unloading of
VOC from marine vessels. In this action,
EPA is addressing only the first of these
components: changes to the rules for
Shipbuilding and Ship Repair, and
Batch Processes, in the BPA area. We
will take action on the second
component in a separate Federal
Register later. We note that the BPA
area currently meets RACT
requirements to limit air emissions of
VOC and hazardous air pollutants
(HAP) from new and existing marine
tank vessel loading operations (30 TAC
115.549). Today, we are approving the
revised VOC rules as part of the Texas
SIP. We also are finding that these
revised VOC rules meet RACT for the
BPA serious 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area.
The second submittal, ‘‘Concerning
Revisions to the Attainment
Demonstration for the Beaumont/Port
Arthur Ozone Nonattainment Area’’ was
also adopted September 9, 2005, by the
State and submitted October 15, 2005, to
EPA for approval as a SIP revision. This
second submittal addressed four of the
BPA area’s outstanding 1-hour ozone
obligations: (1) Major source
applicability for RACT, (2) Clean-Fuel
Vehicle Programs, (3) Reasonably
Available Control Measures (RACM),
and (4) a contingency measure for
marine vessel loading, and also
provided a demonstration of attainment
for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard and
an associated motor vehicle emissions
budget (MVEB). In this action, EPA is
addressing only the first of these
components, the State’s VOC and NOX
RACT demonstration. We will take
action upon the other components later
in Federal Register notices. Today, we
are finding that the NOX rules approved
on October 26, 2000 (65 FR 64148) meet
RACT and that the BPA area meets the
1-hour ozone serious area RACT
requirements for VOC and NOX.
2. What Are the Requirements of Texas’
Regulation for Control of VOCs?
VOC control regulations for two
source categories are being revised to
increase the level of control required:
batch process operations, and
shipbuilding and repair operations.
Today’s action will change the
exemption levels in these two categories
from 100 tpy to 50 tpy of VOC, so that
all of the source categories in the BPA
area have a threshold consistent with
the threshold of 50 tpy or greater for
serious 1-hour ozone nonattainment
areas.
In 2004, the BPA area was reclassified
from a moderate to a serious
nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone
standard, which resulted in a change in
the major source applicability definition
from 100 tpy to 50 tpy. TCEQ staff
reviewed the VOC point source
inventory to determine whether all
major sources were covered by VOC
RACT rules and found that, with the
exception of the batch process rules and
the shipbuilding and ship repair rules,
all other source categories were covered
by a RACT SIP rule in the BPA area
with a threshold consistent with the
threshold of 50 tpy for serious 1-hour
ozone nonattainment areas.
This rule will affect VOC-emitting
facilities in the three counties in the
BPA 1-hour ozone serious
nonattainment area. Table 1 lists the
affected Texas Counties:
TABLE 1—COUNTIES AFFECTED BY
THIS RULEMAKING
Counties in BPA 1-hour ozone nonattainment
area affected by this rulemaking
Hardin
Jefferson
Orange
Texas’ Chapter 115 regulations
control VOC emissions for many
categories of sources. In particular, this
rulemaking affects VOC control
requirements for the following source
categories in the BPA area to meet the
serious area VOC RACT requirements:
Shipbuilding and Ship Repair [30 TAC
115.427(a)(3)(H) and 30 TAC
115.429(c)], and Batch Processes [30
TAC 115.167(1)(A) and 30 TAC
115.169(a) & (c)], which are shown in
Table 2:
TABLE 2—TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (TAC) CHAPTER 115 SUBCHAPTERS AFFECTED BY THIS RULEMAKING
Chapter 115 subchapter
B
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
E
Section
General VOC Sources:
Division 6 Batch Processes:
Exemptions ................................................................................................................................................................
Counties and Compliance Schedules .......................................................................................................................
Solvent-Using Processes:
Division 2 Surface Coating Processes:
Exemptions ................................................................................................................................................................
Counties and Compliance Schedules .......................................................................................................................
To determine whether a specific
facility in one of the above counties will
be affected by one or more of the above
revisions, see Texas’ associated rule
revisions included in the docket.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:18 Jul 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
3. Why Is EPA Approving Texas’
Regulation for Control of VOCs?
Section 182 of the Act requires that
ozone nonattainment areas classified as
moderate and above implement RACT
on certain sources of VOCs and NOX. In
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
115.167(1)(A).
115.169(a) and (c).
115.427(a)(3)(H).
115.429(c).
particular, States must adopt rules that
implement RACT on sources covered by
control techniques guidelines (CTGs)
issued prior to the 1990 amendments to
the Act, sources covered by CTGs issued
after the 1990 amendments and major
E:\FR\FM\10JYR1.SGM
10JYR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 131 / Friday, July 10, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
sources of emissions not covered by a
CTG.
On March 7, 1995, as part of our
action approving VOC RACT
requirements, we found that Texas had
implemented VOC RACT in the BPA
area for both (1) sources covered by a
CTG issued prior to the 1990
amendments to the Act, and (2) major
sources not covered by a CTG (44 FR
12438, March 7, 1995). Since that time,
EPA has issued CTGs, and alternative
control techniques (ACT) for additional
source categories. As a result, EPA has
approved further revisions as meeting
VOC RACT for the BPA area, including
the following: Aerospace Coatings are
addressed in 66 FR 54688 (October 30,
2001); Batch Processes and Industrial
Wastewater in 65 FR 79745 (December
20, 2000); Wood Furniture Coating
Operations and Ship Building and
Repair Operations in 64 FR 12759
(March 15, 1999); Plastic Parts Coatings,
Reactor Processes and Distillation
Operations Process in the SOCMI, and
Volatile Organic Liquid Storage in 64 FR
3841 (January 26, 1999). While CTGs
and ACTs were issued for a few other
categories, there are no major sources in
those categories in the BPA area. Texas
submitted, and EPA approved, negative
declarations on these CTG source
categories in 61 FR 55894 (October 30,
1996). On May 15, 2001, EPA found that
the BPA area had met the VOC RACT
requirements for moderate 1-hour ozone
nonattainment areas (66 FR 26914).
In 2004, BPA was reclassified from
moderate to serious. As a serious area,
the major source threshold dropped
from 100 tpy to 50 tpy. On September
9, 2005, the TCEQ adopted revisions to
the SIP for the BPA 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area. The SIP revisions
were submitted to EPA on October 15,
2005; two parts of these revisions are
being approved in today’s action. One
part of these revisions that is being
approved in this action are the State’s
revised rules that lower the exemption
level for control of VOC emissions from
100 tpy to 50 tpy for shipbuilding and
ship repair and batch processes, thus
making the rules more stringent. This is
consistent with VOC RACT
requirements for serious 1-hour
nonattainment areas. Our approval of
the revised Texas regulations will make
them Federally enforceable and the
revised SIP will meet the serious area
VOC RACT requirements for these
source categories in the BPA area.
EPA has reviewed the revisions for
consistency with the requirements of
the Act and Federal regulations, and
evaluated the analysis provided by
Texas for determining whether the BPA
area meets VOC RACT requirements for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:18 Jul 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
an area with a serious classification for
the 1-hour ozone standard. The specific
requirements and EPA’s evaluation of
these requirements are detailed in the
TSD found in the electronic docket.
Revisions to the Texas regulations for
control of VOC (30 TAC Chapter 115,
sections 115.167, 115.169, 115.427, and
115.429) are also included in the docket.
III. Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for the 1-hr Ozone
BPA Area
On March 30, 2004, EPA reclassified
the BPA area as a serious nonattainment
area for the 1-hour ozone standard and
required the State to submit a revised
SIP meeting the serious area 1-hour
ozone requirements including RACT for
VOC and NOX emissions from major
sources (69 FR 16483); this action
became effective April 29, 2004.
Sections 172(c)(1) and 182 of the Act
require areas that are classified as
moderate or above for ozone
nonattainment to adopt RACT
requirements for sources that are subject
to CTGs for VOC source categories
issued by EPA and for ‘‘major sources’’
of VOCs and NOX, which are ozone
precursors. Specifically, section
182(b)(2) of the Act requires States to
adopt RACT for all major sources of
VOC in ozone nonattainment areas; and,
section 182(f) requires the RACT
provisions for major stationary sources
of NOX. Section 182(c) of the Act
defines ‘‘major source’’ for serious areas
as a source that has the potential to emit
50 tpy or more of NOX. RACT is defined
as the lowest emissions limitation that
a particular source is capable of meeting
by the application of control technology
that is reasonably available considering
technological and economic feasibility
(44 FR 53762; September 17, 1979).
EPA published the 8-hour ozone
designations and the Phase 1 Rule for
implementing the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard and the designations for the 8hour ozone standard in the Federal
Register (FR) on April 30, 2004 (69 FR
23858 and 69 FR 23951). The BPA area
was designated nonattainment for this
standard and classified as marginal, and
included the following three counties:
Hardin, Jefferson, and Orange (these
three also constituted the 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area). At the time of
designation for the 1997 8-hour
standard, BPA was a nonattainment area
for the 1-hour ozone standard and had
several outstanding 1-hour ozone
obligations, including the area did not
have approved serious area RACT
requirements for VOC and NOX
emissions.
The Phase 1 Rule provided that 1hour ozone nonattainment areas were
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33149
required to adopt and implement
‘‘applicable requirements’’ according to
the area’s classification under the 1hour ozone standard (see 40 CFR
51.905(a)(i)). The BPA area was
classified as a serious nonattainment
area at the time of the 8-hour
designation and an outstanding
‘‘applicable requirement’’ for the BPA
area is serious area RACT for VOC and
NOX. In the three counties which
comprise the 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area (Hardin, Jefferson
and Orange), Texas previously adopted
rules to address VOC and NOX RACT
requirements for all major sources at the
moderate area major source emissions
threshold of 100 tons per year (tpy) or
greater. The reclassification of the BPA
area from moderate to serious for the 1hour ozone standard, on March 30, 2004
(69 FR 16483), required Texas to ensure
that RACT was in place on all major
sources of 50 tpy or greater of VOC and
NOX emissions.
EPA reviewed the SIP rules, the
revised VOC rules being approved
today, and the State’s RACT
demonstration to determine whether
RACT for VOCs and NOX has been
adopted in the BPA area as required to
meet 1-hour ozone standard
requirements. EPA is finding that the
RACT requirements for VOCs and NOX
in the BPA area meet the 1-hour ozone
standard serious area requirements.
RACT for VOCs and RACT for NOX are
discussed successively below.
1. VOC RACT
In the three counties which comprise
the 1-hour ozone nonattainment area
(Hardin, Jefferson and Orange), Texas
previously adopted rules to address
RACT requirements for all VOC source
categories covered by EPA CTGs, and to
address VOC major sources not covered
by CTGs at the moderate area major
source emissions threshold of 100 tons
per year (tpy). A CTG provides
information on the available controls for
a VOC source category and provides a
‘‘presumptive norm’’ for VOC RACT.
EPA approved these rules as meeting
VOC RACT for a moderate 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area in a series of
actions.
On March 7, 1995, as part of our
action approving VOC requirements,
EPA found that Texas had implemented
RACT in the BPA area for both (1)
sources covered by a CTG issued prior
to the 1990 amendments to the Act, and
(2) major sources not covered by a CTG
(60 FR 12438). On October 30, 1996,
EPA approved SIP Revisions Regarding
Negative Declarations for Source
Categories Subject to RACT for
Louisiana and Texas (61 FR 55984). For
E:\FR\FM\10JYR1.SGM
10JYR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
33150
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 131 / Friday, July 10, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the Beaumont/Port Arthur region,
negative declarations were approved for
the following categories: clean-up
solvents, aerospace coatings,
shipbuilding and repair, wood furniture,
plastic part coatings—business
machines, plastic part coatings—others,
autobody refinishing, and offset
lithography. On May 22, 1997, EPA
granted limited approval of VOC control
measures for Texas (62 FR 27964). This
action finalized the proposed limited
approval of control measures that were
included as part of an earlier proposal
related to a 15 Percent Rate of Progress
Plan (61 FR 2751, Jan. 29, 1996). We
converted this limited approval into a
full approval on January 26, 1999 (64 FR
3841).
Since that time, EPA has approved
further revisions as meeting RACT for
the BPA area, including the following:
Aerospace Coatings are addressed in 66
FR 54688 (October 30, 2001); Batch
Processes and Industrial Wastewater in
65 FR 79745 (December 20, 2000); Wood
Furniture Coating Operations and Ship
Building and Repair Operations in 64
FR 12759 (March 15, 1999); Plastic Parts
Coatings, Reactor Processes and
Distillation Operations Process in the
SOCMI, and Volatile Organic Liquid
Storage in 64 FR 3841 (January 26,
1999). While CTGs and ACTs were
issued for a few other categories, there
are no major sources in those categories
in the BPA area. Texas submitted, and
EPA approved, negative declarations on
these categories in 61 FR 55894 (October
30, 1996). On May 15, 2001, EPA found
that the BPA area had met VOC RACT
requirements for moderate 1-hour ozone
nonattainment areas (66 FR 26914). EPA
approved additional control measures
which enhanced the Texas VOC RACT
SIP in an action on February 27, 2008
(73 FR 10383); among other things, this
action included requirements to control
VOC emissions from industrial
wastewater systems in BPA.
Texas submitted two SIP revisions
addressing the serious area RACT
requirements (one lowering the limit of
two VOC rules from 100 to 50 tpy, and
another addressing serious VOC and
NOX RACT overall), and we reviewed
both SIP submissions with respect to the
1-hour ozone serious area RACT
requirements for the BPA 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area.
EPA has evaluated the analysis
provided by Texas for determining
whether the BPA area meets VOC RACT
requirements for an area with a serious
classification. The specific requirements
to meet RACT and EPA’s evaluation of
these requirements are detailed in the
TSD, which is available in the docket
supporting this action: Docket No. EPA–
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:18 Jul 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
R06–OAR–2005–TX–0005. Texas’ 30
TAC Chapter 115 revisions are included
in the docket. Based upon the TCEQ’s
review and our evaluation, we are
finding that the BPA area meets the
serious area RACT requirements for
VOCs under the 1-hour ozone standard.
2. NOX RACT
The Act’s NOX RACT requirements
are described by EPA in the ‘‘NOX
Supplement’’ document titled, ‘‘State
Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides
Supplement to the General Preamble;
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Implementation of Title I; Proposed
Rule,’’ published November 25, 1992
(57 FR 55620). EPA also discussed what
it viewed as presumptive NOX RACT,
concerning emission limits for certain
categories of utility boilers, using a 30day rolling average basis. For those
source categories which EPA addressed
in the NOX Supplement and their
presumptive RACT, States were
required to adopt rules that either met
EPA’s presumptions or were at least as
stringent, to meet the NOX RACT
requirements.
In setting the NOX RACT standards,
the States may consider the total cost,
total emission reductions, and cost
effectiveness of controls needed to
achieve the emission limits or
equipment standards. Generally, the
total NOX reductions achieved and the
cost effectiveness of NOX controls fall
within the ranges articulated in EPA’s
Office of Air Quality Planning policy
memoranda, such as the March 16, 1994
memorandum entitled, ‘‘Cost-Effective
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) Reasonably
Available Control Technology (RACT)’’,
and the January 10, 1995 memorandum
entitled, ‘‘De Minimis Values For NOX
RACT.’’ For example, the March 16,
1994 memorandum recommends that a
NOX reduction of 30% to 50%,
corresponding to a cost-effectiveness
range of $160 to $1300, be considered in
the setting of NOX RACT standards.
For the Texas SIP, EPA initially
approved revisions to the SIP’s NOX
rules, found at 30 TAC Chapter 117, into
the Texas SIP as adopted by the State on
May 11, 1993, at 65 FR 11468 (March 3,
2000). Among other things, EPA
approved the revised NOX rules for the
BPA area as meeting NOX RACT, in that
rulemaking action. See Table II of the 65
FR 11468 for a detailed summary of
NOX emissions limits. By approving the
revised NOX rules as RACT in that
rulemaking action we also made the
finding that the BPA area met the
moderate area NOX RACT requirements.
On September 1, 2000 at 65 FR 53172,
EPA approved revisions to the Texas
SIP NOX rules at 30 TAC Chapter 117,
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
into the Texas SIP. EPA approved the
rules as meeting RACT for the BPA area,
among other things, in that rulemaking
action. We evaluated the NOX emission
limitations for the BPA area and found
them to be reasonably available, and
technologically and economically
feasible. For more information, see
Tables I and II of 65 FR 53172 for a
detailed summary of those NOX
emissions limits, as well as pages 15–18
of the TSD prepared in conjunction with
this rulemaking.
On October 26, 2000, at 65 FR 64148,
the EPA approved further revisions to
the Texas SIP NOX rules at 30 TAC
Chapter 117, into the Texas SIP. In that
SIP revision action by EPA, the NOX
revised rules entitled, ‘‘Emissions
Specifications for Attainment
Demonstration (ESAD)’’ were
considered at that time to be more
stringent than moderate area NOX
RACT. Tables III and IV of 65 FR 64148
contain summaries of those NOX
emissions limits. We did not make a
NOX RACT determination at that time.
The State’s NOX RACT demonstration
submitted by the State on October 15,
2005, to show that serious NOX RACT
is in place in the BPA area, relies upon
all of the above SIP-approved NOX
rules. Today, we are finding that the
revised NOX rules approved into the
Texas SIP on October 26, 2000, meet
NOX RACT.
We are finding that the Texas SIP
rules in 30 TAC Chapter 117, Control of
Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds
for major sources, located in the three
Texas Counties of Jefferson, Hardin, and
Orange, apply to all sources having a
potential to emit of 50 tpy or more of
NOX, and meet the NOX RACT
requirements for a serious ozone
nonattainment area under the 1-hour
ozone standard. We have examined the
NOX control requirements of the Texas
SIP rules at 30 TAC Chapter 117 for the
affected sources within these three
Texas Counties, as approved into the
Texas SIP, and have determined that the
rules apply to serious area major source
thresholds and that the level of control
for these affected sources in the BPA
area meets the NOX RACT requirements
of the Act and is consistent with our
guidance documents. For more
information, see the TSD document
prepared in conjunction with today’s
rulemaking action, as well as 65 FR
11468, 65 FR 53172, and 65 FR 64148.
The TSD is made available in docket
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2005–TX–0005.
You can find the NOX RACT-related
documents at https://www.epa.gov/ttn/
naaqs/ozone/ctg_act/index.htm (URL
dating October 9, 2008).
E:\FR\FM\10JYR1.SGM
10JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 131 / Friday, July 10, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
The existing NOX rules in the Texas
SIP already apply to a serious area’s
source threshold and we either have
found or are today finding that they
meet NOX RACT. Based upon the
TCEQ’s review and our evaluation, we
are finding that the BPA area meets
serious area RACT requirements for
NOX under the 1-hour ozone standard.
IV. What Is the Process for EPA To
Approve This SIP Revision?
The EPA is publishing this rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register
publication, EPA is publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision
should adverse comments be filed. This
action will be effective September 8,
2009 without further notice, unless EPA
receives relevant adverse comments by
August 10, 2009.
If EPA receives such comment, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that this rule will
not take effect. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period.
Parties interested in commenting should
do so at this time. If no such comments
are received, the public is advised that
this rule will be effective on September
8, 2009 and no further action will be
taken on the proposed rule. Please note
that if EPA receives adverse comment
on an amendment, paragraph, or section
of this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
V. Final Action
EPA is approving Texas’ Chapter 115
Control of Air Pollution from Volatile
Organic Compounds amendments to
sections 115.167, 115.169, 115.427, and
115.429 which extend requirements for
control of VOC emissions to sources
with the potential to emit 50 tpy or
more, and incorporating this regulation
into the Texas SIP. In conjunction with
approving these VOC amendments into
the Texas SIP, EPA finds they meet
serious area VOC RACT. EPA also finds
that the NOX rules approved into the
Texas SIP on October 26, 2000, at 65 FR
64148, are RACT. Further, EPA is also
finding, based upon our review and
evaluation of the State’s demonstration,
that the BPA area meets the serious area
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:18 Jul 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
VOC and NOX RACT requirements for
the 1-hour ozone standard.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); and
• Does not have Tribal implications
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply
in Indian country located in the State,
and EPA notes that it will not impose
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33151
substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C.
801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 8,
2009. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Nitrogen dioxides, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 29, 2009.
Miguel I. Flores,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS—Texas
2. Section 52.2270 is amended as
follows:
■ a. The table in paragraph (c) entitled
‘‘EPA Approved Regulations in the
Texas SIP’’ is amended under ‘‘Chapter
115 (Reg 5)—Control of Air Pollution
From Volatile Organic Compounds’’ by
revising the entries for Sections 115.167,
115.169, 115.427, and 115.429.
■
E:\FR\FM\10JYR1.SGM
10JYR1
33152
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 131 / Friday, July 10, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
b. The second table in paragraph (e)
entitled ‘‘EPA-Approved Nonregulatory
Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory
Measures in the Texas SIP’’ is amended
by adding at the end a new entry for
■
‘‘VOC and NOX RACT demonstration for
the 1-hour ozone NAAQS’’ for the
Beaumont/Port Arthur Area.
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 52.2270
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP
State citation
State
approval/
submittal
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
EPA approval date
*
*
Explanation
*
*
Chapter 115 (Reg 5)—Control of Air Pollution from Volatile Organic Compounds
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Subchapter B—General Volatile Organic Compound Sources
*
*
*
*
*
Division 6: Batch Processes
*
Section 115.167 .......
*
*
Exemptions ..........................................
*
9/28/2005
Section 115.169 .......
Counties and Compliance Schedules
9/28/2005
*
*
*
*
7/10/2009 [Insert
where document
7/10/2009 [Insert
where document
*
*
FR page number
begins].
FR page number
begins].
*
*
*
*
*
*
Subchapter E—Solvent-Using Processes
*
*
*
*
*
Division 2: Surface Coating Processes
*
Section 115.427 .......
*
*
Exemptions ..........................................
*
9/28/2005
Section 115.429 .......
Counties and Compliance Schedules
9/28/2005
*
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
7/10/2009 [Insert
where document
7/10/2009 [Insert
where document
*
*
FR page number
begins].
FR page number
begins].
*
*
*
*
*
EPA-APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE TEXAS SIP
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
*
VOC and NOX RACT demonstration for the 1-hour
ozone NAAQS.
*
State submittal/effective
date
*
Beaumont/Port Arthur Area: Hardin, Jefferson, and Orange
Counties.
*
9/28/2005
EPA approval date
*
*
7/10/2009 [Insert FR page number where document begins].
[FR Doc. E9–16270 Filed 7–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:18 Jul 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\10JYR1.SGM
10JYR1
Comments
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 131 (Friday, July 10, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33146-33152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16270]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2005-TX-0005; FRL-8928-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Texas; Revisions to the 1-Hour Ozone Plan for the Beaumont/Port Arthur
Area: Control of Air Pollution From Volatile Organic Compounds,
Nitrogen Compounds, and Reasonably Available Control Technology
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving part of two Beaumont-Port Arthur (BPA) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions that were submitted separately by
the State of Texas on October 15, 2005. The revisions being approved
pertain to volatile organic compound (VOC) control requirements for
batch processing and ship building and ship repair, and also to
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements, for the
Beaumont/Port Arthur (BPA) 1-hour ozone serious nonattainment area. In
today's action, EPA is approving: The State's changes to the batch
process rules and the shipbuilding and ship repair rules that lower the
threshold for affected sources of VOC emissions to the serious area
requirements of 50 tons per year (tpy),
[[Page 33147]]
and the State's demonstration that the BPA area meets RACT requirements
for sources of VOC and NOX emissions for the 1-hour ozone
standard. These revisions meet statutory and regulatory requirements,
and are consistent with EPA's guidance. The EPA is approving these
revisions pursuant to section 110 and part D of the Federal Clean Air
Act (the Act).
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective September 8, 2009
without further notice, unless EPA receives relevant adverse comments
by August 10, 2009. If EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that this rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2005-TX-0005, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
EPA Region 6 ``Contact Us'' Web site: https://epa.gov/region6/r6coment.htm. Please click on ``6PD'' (Multimedia) and select
``Air'' before submitting comments.
E-mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson at donaldson.guy@epa.gov. Please
also send a copy by e-mail to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
Fax: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), at fax number 214-665-7263.
Mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Such deliveries are
accepted only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays except
for legal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries
of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2005-TX-0005. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Planning
Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. The file will be made available by
appointment for public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review Room
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal
holidays. Contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at 214-665-7253 to make an
appointment. If possible, please make the appointment at least two
working days in advance of your visit. There will be a 15 cent per page
fee for making photocopies of documents. On the day of the visit,
please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
The State submittal is also available for public inspection at the
State Air Agency listed below during official business hours by
appointment: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), Office
of Air Quality, 12124 Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas 78753.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Belk, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite
700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-2164; fax number
214-665-7263; e-mail address belk.ellen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we''
``us'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
II. Control of VOC Emissions for Batch Processes and Shipbuilding
and Ship Repair
1. What Has the State Submitted?
2. What Are the Requirements of Texas' Regulation for Control of
VOCs?
3. Why Is EPA Approving Texas' Regulation for Control of VOCs?
III. Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for the 1-hr
Ozone BPA Area
1. VOC RACT
2. NOX RACT
IV. What Is the Process for EPA To Approve This SIP Revision?
V. Final Action
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
We are approving parts of two State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions containing VOC controls submitted by the State of Texas
pertaining to the BPA 1-hour ozone serious nonattainment area, as well
as the State's demonstration that the BPA area meets RACT requirements
for sources of VOC and NOX emissions for the 1-hour ozone
standard. Specifically, the revisions to the batch process rules and
shipbuilding and ship repair rules lower VOC emission exemption levels
for batch process operations and shipbuilding and ship repair
operations in the BPA area from 100 tpy to 50 tpy to reflect the
classification status of the BPA area as serious under the 1-hour
standard, revising sections 115.167, 115.169, 115.427, and 115.429 of
Title 30 of the Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 115 (30 TAC 115).
The SIP revisions being approved today also include a demonstration
that the BPA area meets the RACT requirements for VOC and
NOX for a serious 1-hour ozone nonattainment area. RACT is
the lowest emission limit that a particular source is capable of
meeting by the application of the control technology that is reasonably
available considering technological and economic feasibility. RACT
requirements for ozone nonattainment areas can be found in section 182
of the Act. For its RACT demonstration, the State relies upon
previously approved VOC and NOX SIP rules (e.g., 65 FR
[[Page 33148]]
64148, October 26, 2000), as well as the VOC rule changes for batch
process and shipbuilding and ship repair being approved in this action.
EPA is finding that the BPA 1-hour ozone serious nonattainment area
meets the RACT requirements for VOCs and NOX.
II. Control of VOC Emissions in Batch Processes and Shipbuilding and
Ship Repair
1. What Has the State Submitted?
This action addresses part of two Texas submittals for Control of
VOCs. The first submittal, entitled ``Concerning Revisions to 30 TAC
Chapter 115 Control of Air Pollution from Volatile Organic Compounds''
was adopted September 9, 2005, by the State of Texas and submitted to
EPA for approval as a SIP revision on October 15, 2005. This submittal
included the following: (1) Revising VOC control requirements for the
following source categories in the BPA area to meet the serious area
VOC RACT requirements: Shipbuilding and Ship Repair, and Batch
Processes, and (2) removing a contingency measure requirement for
controls for loading and unloading of VOC from marine vessels. In this
action, EPA is addressing only the first of these components: changes
to the rules for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair, and Batch Processes, in
the BPA area. We will take action on the second component in a separate
Federal Register later. We note that the BPA area currently meets RACT
requirements to limit air emissions of VOC and hazardous air pollutants
(HAP) from new and existing marine tank vessel loading operations (30
TAC 115.549). Today, we are approving the revised VOC rules as part of
the Texas SIP. We also are finding that these revised VOC rules meet
RACT for the BPA serious 1-hour ozone nonattainment area.
The second submittal, ``Concerning Revisions to the Attainment
Demonstration for the Beaumont/Port Arthur Ozone Nonattainment Area''
was also adopted September 9, 2005, by the State and submitted October
15, 2005, to EPA for approval as a SIP revision. This second submittal
addressed four of the BPA area's outstanding 1-hour ozone obligations:
(1) Major source applicability for RACT, (2) Clean-Fuel Vehicle
Programs, (3) Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM), and (4) a
contingency measure for marine vessel loading, and also provided a
demonstration of attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard and an
associated motor vehicle emissions budget (MVEB). In this action, EPA
is addressing only the first of these components, the State's VOC and
NOX RACT demonstration. We will take action upon the other
components later in Federal Register notices. Today, we are finding
that the NOX rules approved on October 26, 2000 (65 FR
64148) meet RACT and that the BPA area meets the 1-hour ozone serious
area RACT requirements for VOC and NOX.
2. What Are the Requirements of Texas' Regulation for Control of VOCs?
VOC control regulations for two source categories are being revised
to increase the level of control required: batch process operations,
and shipbuilding and repair operations. Today's action will change the
exemption levels in these two categories from 100 tpy to 50 tpy of VOC,
so that all of the source categories in the BPA area have a threshold
consistent with the threshold of 50 tpy or greater for serious 1-hour
ozone nonattainment areas.
In 2004, the BPA area was reclassified from a moderate to a serious
nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone standard, which resulted in a
change in the major source applicability definition from 100 tpy to 50
tpy. TCEQ staff reviewed the VOC point source inventory to determine
whether all major sources were covered by VOC RACT rules and found
that, with the exception of the batch process rules and the
shipbuilding and ship repair rules, all other source categories were
covered by a RACT SIP rule in the BPA area with a threshold consistent
with the threshold of 50 tpy for serious 1-hour ozone nonattainment
areas.
This rule will affect VOC-emitting facilities in the three counties
in the BPA 1-hour ozone serious nonattainment area. Table 1 lists the
affected Texas Counties:
Table 1--Counties Affected by This Rulemaking
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Counties in BPA 1-hour ozone nonattainment area affected by this
rulemaking
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardin
Jefferson
Orange
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Texas' Chapter 115 regulations control VOC emissions for many
categories of sources. In particular, this rulemaking affects VOC
control requirements for the following source categories in the BPA
area to meet the serious area VOC RACT requirements: Shipbuilding and
Ship Repair [30 TAC 115.427(a)(3)(H) and 30 TAC 115.429(c)], and Batch
Processes [30 TAC 115.167(1)(A) and 30 TAC 115.169(a) & (c)], which are
shown in Table 2:
Table 2--Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 115 Subchapters
Affected by This Rulemaking
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 115 subchapter Section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
B General VOC Sources:
Division 6 Batch Processes:
Exemptions................... 115.167(1)(A).
Counties and Compliance 115.169(a) and (c).
Schedules.
E Solvent-Using Processes:
Division 2 Surface Coating
Processes:
Exemptions................... 115.427(a)(3)(H).
Counties and Compliance 115.429(c).
Schedules.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To determine whether a specific facility in one of the above
counties will be affected by one or more of the above revisions, see
Texas' associated rule revisions included in the docket.
3. Why Is EPA Approving Texas' Regulation for Control of VOCs?
Section 182 of the Act requires that ozone nonattainment areas
classified as moderate and above implement RACT on certain sources of
VOCs and NOX. In particular, States must adopt rules that
implement RACT on sources covered by control techniques guidelines
(CTGs) issued prior to the 1990 amendments to the Act, sources covered
by CTGs issued after the 1990 amendments and major
[[Page 33149]]
sources of emissions not covered by a CTG.
On March 7, 1995, as part of our action approving VOC RACT
requirements, we found that Texas had implemented VOC RACT in the BPA
area for both (1) sources covered by a CTG issued prior to the 1990
amendments to the Act, and (2) major sources not covered by a CTG (44
FR 12438, March 7, 1995). Since that time, EPA has issued CTGs, and
alternative control techniques (ACT) for additional source categories.
As a result, EPA has approved further revisions as meeting VOC RACT for
the BPA area, including the following: Aerospace Coatings are addressed
in 66 FR 54688 (October 30, 2001); Batch Processes and Industrial
Wastewater in 65 FR 79745 (December 20, 2000); Wood Furniture Coating
Operations and Ship Building and Repair Operations in 64 FR 12759
(March 15, 1999); Plastic Parts Coatings, Reactor Processes and
Distillation Operations Process in the SOCMI, and Volatile Organic
Liquid Storage in 64 FR 3841 (January 26, 1999). While CTGs and ACTs
were issued for a few other categories, there are no major sources in
those categories in the BPA area. Texas submitted, and EPA approved,
negative declarations on these CTG source categories in 61 FR 55894
(October 30, 1996). On May 15, 2001, EPA found that the BPA area had
met the VOC RACT requirements for moderate 1-hour ozone nonattainment
areas (66 FR 26914).
In 2004, BPA was reclassified from moderate to serious. As a
serious area, the major source threshold dropped from 100 tpy to 50
tpy. On September 9, 2005, the TCEQ adopted revisions to the SIP for
the BPA 1-hour ozone nonattainment area. The SIP revisions were
submitted to EPA on October 15, 2005; two parts of these revisions are
being approved in today's action. One part of these revisions that is
being approved in this action are the State's revised rules that lower
the exemption level for control of VOC emissions from 100 tpy to 50 tpy
for shipbuilding and ship repair and batch processes, thus making the
rules more stringent. This is consistent with VOC RACT requirements for
serious 1-hour nonattainment areas. Our approval of the revised Texas
regulations will make them Federally enforceable and the revised SIP
will meet the serious area VOC RACT requirements for these source
categories in the BPA area.
EPA has reviewed the revisions for consistency with the
requirements of the Act and Federal regulations, and evaluated the
analysis provided by Texas for determining whether the BPA area meets
VOC RACT requirements for an area with a serious classification for the
1-hour ozone standard. The specific requirements and EPA's evaluation
of these requirements are detailed in the TSD found in the electronic
docket. Revisions to the Texas regulations for control of VOC (30 TAC
Chapter 115, sections 115.167, 115.169, 115.427, and 115.429) are also
included in the docket.
III. Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for the 1-hr Ozone
BPA Area
On March 30, 2004, EPA reclassified the BPA area as a serious
nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone standard and required the State
to submit a revised SIP meeting the serious area 1-hour ozone
requirements including RACT for VOC and NOX emissions from
major sources (69 FR 16483); this action became effective April 29,
2004.
Sections 172(c)(1) and 182 of the Act require areas that are
classified as moderate or above for ozone nonattainment to adopt RACT
requirements for sources that are subject to CTGs for VOC source
categories issued by EPA and for ``major sources'' of VOCs and
NOX, which are ozone precursors. Specifically, section
182(b)(2) of the Act requires States to adopt RACT for all major
sources of VOC in ozone nonattainment areas; and, section 182(f)
requires the RACT provisions for major stationary sources of
NOX. Section 182(c) of the Act defines ``major source'' for
serious areas as a source that has the potential to emit 50 tpy or more
of NOX. RACT is defined as the lowest emissions limitation
that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of
control technology that is reasonably available considering
technological and economic feasibility (44 FR 53762; September 17,
1979).
EPA published the 8-hour ozone designations and the Phase 1 Rule
for implementing the 1997 8-hour ozone standard and the designations
for the 8-hour ozone standard in the Federal Register (FR) on April 30,
2004 (69 FR 23858 and 69 FR 23951). The BPA area was designated
nonattainment for this standard and classified as marginal, and
included the following three counties: Hardin, Jefferson, and Orange
(these three also constituted the 1-hour ozone nonattainment area). At
the time of designation for the 1997 8-hour standard, BPA was a
nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone standard and had several
outstanding 1-hour ozone obligations, including the area did not have
approved serious area RACT requirements for VOC and NOX
emissions.
The Phase 1 Rule provided that 1-hour ozone nonattainment areas
were required to adopt and implement ``applicable requirements''
according to the area's classification under the 1-hour ozone standard
(see 40 CFR 51.905(a)(i)). The BPA area was classified as a serious
nonattainment area at the time of the 8-hour designation and an
outstanding ``applicable requirement'' for the BPA area is serious area
RACT for VOC and NOX. In the three counties which comprise
the 1-hour ozone nonattainment area (Hardin, Jefferson and Orange),
Texas previously adopted rules to address VOC and NOX RACT
requirements for all major sources at the moderate area major source
emissions threshold of 100 tons per year (tpy) or greater. The
reclassification of the BPA area from moderate to serious for the 1-
hour ozone standard, on March 30, 2004 (69 FR 16483), required Texas to
ensure that RACT was in place on all major sources of 50 tpy or greater
of VOC and NOX emissions.
EPA reviewed the SIP rules, the revised VOC rules being approved
today, and the State's RACT demonstration to determine whether RACT for
VOCs and NOX has been adopted in the BPA area as required to
meet 1-hour ozone standard requirements. EPA is finding that the RACT
requirements for VOCs and NOX in the BPA area meet the 1-
hour ozone standard serious area requirements. RACT for VOCs and RACT
for NOX are discussed successively below.
1. VOC RACT
In the three counties which comprise the 1-hour ozone nonattainment
area (Hardin, Jefferson and Orange), Texas previously adopted rules to
address RACT requirements for all VOC source categories covered by EPA
CTGs, and to address VOC major sources not covered by CTGs at the
moderate area major source emissions threshold of 100 tons per year
(tpy). A CTG provides information on the available controls for a VOC
source category and provides a ``presumptive norm'' for VOC RACT. EPA
approved these rules as meeting VOC RACT for a moderate 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area in a series of actions.
On March 7, 1995, as part of our action approving VOC requirements,
EPA found that Texas had implemented RACT in the BPA area for both (1)
sources covered by a CTG issued prior to the 1990 amendments to the
Act, and (2) major sources not covered by a CTG (60 FR 12438). On
October 30, 1996, EPA approved SIP Revisions Regarding Negative
Declarations for Source Categories Subject to RACT for Louisiana and
Texas (61 FR 55984). For
[[Page 33150]]
the Beaumont/Port Arthur region, negative declarations were approved
for the following categories: clean-up solvents, aerospace coatings,
shipbuilding and repair, wood furniture, plastic part coatings--
business machines, plastic part coatings--others, autobody refinishing,
and offset lithography. On May 22, 1997, EPA granted limited approval
of VOC control measures for Texas (62 FR 27964). This action finalized
the proposed limited approval of control measures that were included as
part of an earlier proposal related to a 15 Percent Rate of Progress
Plan (61 FR 2751, Jan. 29, 1996). We converted this limited approval
into a full approval on January 26, 1999 (64 FR 3841).
Since that time, EPA has approved further revisions as meeting RACT
for the BPA area, including the following: Aerospace Coatings are
addressed in 66 FR 54688 (October 30, 2001); Batch Processes and
Industrial Wastewater in 65 FR 79745 (December 20, 2000); Wood
Furniture Coating Operations and Ship Building and Repair Operations in
64 FR 12759 (March 15, 1999); Plastic Parts Coatings, Reactor Processes
and Distillation Operations Process in the SOCMI, and Volatile Organic
Liquid Storage in 64 FR 3841 (January 26, 1999). While CTGs and ACTs
were issued for a few other categories, there are no major sources in
those categories in the BPA area. Texas submitted, and EPA approved,
negative declarations on these categories in 61 FR 55894 (October 30,
1996). On May 15, 2001, EPA found that the BPA area had met VOC RACT
requirements for moderate 1-hour ozone nonattainment areas (66 FR
26914). EPA approved additional control measures which enhanced the
Texas VOC RACT SIP in an action on February 27, 2008 (73 FR 10383);
among other things, this action included requirements to control VOC
emissions from industrial wastewater systems in BPA.
Texas submitted two SIP revisions addressing the serious area RACT
requirements (one lowering the limit of two VOC rules from 100 to 50
tpy, and another addressing serious VOC and NOX RACT
overall), and we reviewed both SIP submissions with respect to the 1-
hour ozone serious area RACT requirements for the BPA 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area.
EPA has evaluated the analysis provided by Texas for determining
whether the BPA area meets VOC RACT requirements for an area with a
serious classification. The specific requirements to meet RACT and
EPA's evaluation of these requirements are detailed in the TSD, which
is available in the docket supporting this action: Docket No. EPA-R06-
OAR-2005-TX-0005. Texas' 30 TAC Chapter 115 revisions are included in
the docket. Based upon the TCEQ's review and our evaluation, we are
finding that the BPA area meets the serious area RACT requirements for
VOCs under the 1-hour ozone standard.
2. NOX RACT
The Act's NOX RACT requirements are described by EPA in
the ``NOX Supplement'' document titled, ``State
Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the General
Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of Title I;
Proposed Rule,'' published November 25, 1992 (57 FR 55620). EPA also
discussed what it viewed as presumptive NOX RACT, concerning
emission limits for certain categories of utility boilers, using a 30-
day rolling average basis. For those source categories which EPA
addressed in the NOX Supplement and their presumptive RACT,
States were required to adopt rules that either met EPA's presumptions
or were at least as stringent, to meet the NOX RACT
requirements.
In setting the NOX RACT standards, the States may
consider the total cost, total emission reductions, and cost
effectiveness of controls needed to achieve the emission limits or
equipment standards. Generally, the total NOX reductions
achieved and the cost effectiveness of NOX controls fall
within the ranges articulated in EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning
policy memoranda, such as the March 16, 1994 memorandum entitled,
``Cost-Effective Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT)'', and the January 10, 1995 memorandum
entitled, ``De Minimis Values For NOX RACT.'' For example,
the March 16, 1994 memorandum recommends that a NOX
reduction of 30% to 50%, corresponding to a cost-effectiveness range of
$160 to $1300, be considered in the setting of NOX RACT
standards.
For the Texas SIP, EPA initially approved revisions to the SIP's
NOX rules, found at 30 TAC Chapter 117, into the Texas SIP
as adopted by the State on May 11, 1993, at 65 FR 11468 (March 3,
2000). Among other things, EPA approved the revised NOX
rules for the BPA area as meeting NOX RACT, in that
rulemaking action. See Table II of the 65 FR 11468 for a detailed
summary of NOX emissions limits. By approving the revised
NOX rules as RACT in that rulemaking action we also made the
finding that the BPA area met the moderate area NOX RACT
requirements.
On September 1, 2000 at 65 FR 53172, EPA approved revisions to the
Texas SIP NOX rules at 30 TAC Chapter 117, into the Texas
SIP. EPA approved the rules as meeting RACT for the BPA area, among
other things, in that rulemaking action. We evaluated the
NOX emission limitations for the BPA area and found them to
be reasonably available, and technologically and economically feasible.
For more information, see Tables I and II of 65 FR 53172 for a detailed
summary of those NOX emissions limits, as well as pages 15-
18 of the TSD prepared in conjunction with this rulemaking.
On October 26, 2000, at 65 FR 64148, the EPA approved further
revisions to the Texas SIP NOX rules at 30 TAC Chapter 117,
into the Texas SIP. In that SIP revision action by EPA, the
NOX revised rules entitled, ``Emissions Specifications for
Attainment Demonstration (ESAD)'' were considered at that time to be
more stringent than moderate area NOX RACT. Tables III and
IV of 65 FR 64148 contain summaries of those NOX emissions
limits. We did not make a NOX RACT determination at that
time.
The State's NOX RACT demonstration submitted by the
State on October 15, 2005, to show that serious NOX RACT is
in place in the BPA area, relies upon all of the above SIP-approved
NOX rules. Today, we are finding that the revised
NOX rules approved into the Texas SIP on October 26, 2000,
meet NOX RACT.
We are finding that the Texas SIP rules in 30 TAC Chapter 117,
Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds for major sources,
located in the three Texas Counties of Jefferson, Hardin, and Orange,
apply to all sources having a potential to emit of 50 tpy or more of
NOX, and meet the NOX RACT requirements for a
serious ozone nonattainment area under the 1-hour ozone standard. We
have examined the NOX control requirements of the Texas SIP
rules at 30 TAC Chapter 117 for the affected sources within these three
Texas Counties, as approved into the Texas SIP, and have determined
that the rules apply to serious area major source thresholds and that
the level of control for these affected sources in the BPA area meets
the NOX RACT requirements of the Act and is consistent with
our guidance documents. For more information, see the TSD document
prepared in conjunction with today's rulemaking action, as well as 65
FR 11468, 65 FR 53172, and 65 FR 64148. The TSD is made available in
docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2005-TX-0005. You can find the NOX
RACT-related documents at https://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/ozone/ctg_act/index.htm (URL dating October 9, 2008).
[[Page 33151]]
The existing NOX rules in the Texas SIP already apply to
a serious area's source threshold and we either have found or are today
finding that they meet NOX RACT. Based upon the TCEQ's
review and our evaluation, we are finding that the BPA area meets
serious area RACT requirements for NOX under the 1-hour
ozone standard.
IV. What Is the Process for EPA To Approve This SIP Revision?
The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
adverse comments be filed. This action will be effective September 8,
2009 without further notice, unless EPA receives relevant adverse
comments by August 10, 2009.
If EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal
of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public
that this rule will not take effect. All public comments received will
then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed
rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Parties
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments
are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on
September 8, 2009 and no further action will be taken on the proposed
rule. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
V. Final Action
EPA is approving Texas' Chapter 115 Control of Air Pollution from
Volatile Organic Compounds amendments to sections 115.167, 115.169,
115.427, and 115.429 which extend requirements for control of VOC
emissions to sources with the potential to emit 50 tpy or more, and
incorporating this regulation into the Texas SIP. In conjunction with
approving these VOC amendments into the Texas SIP, EPA finds they meet
serious area VOC RACT. EPA also finds that the NOX rules
approved into the Texas SIP on October 26, 2000, at 65 FR 64148, are
RACT. Further, EPA is also finding, based upon our review and
evaluation of the State's demonstration, that the BPA area meets the
serious area VOC and NOX RACT requirements for the 1-hour
ozone standard.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act;
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); and
Does not have Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP
is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and
EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 8, 2009. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Nitrogen dioxides,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 29, 2009.
Miguel I. Flores,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS--Texas
0
2. Section 52.2270 is amended as follows:
0
a. The table in paragraph (c) entitled ``EPA Approved Regulations in
the Texas SIP'' is amended under ``Chapter 115 (Reg 5)--Control of Air
Pollution From Volatile Organic Compounds'' by revising the entries for
Sections 115.167, 115.169, 115.427, and 115.429.
[[Page 33152]]
0
b. The second table in paragraph (e) entitled ``EPA-Approved
Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Texas
SIP'' is amended by adding at the end a new entry for ``VOC and
NOX RACT demonstration for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS'' for the
Beaumont/Port Arthur Area.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 52.2270 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Regulations in the Texas SIP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State approval/
State citation Title/subject submittal EPA approval date Explanation
date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 115 (Reg 5)--Control of Air Pollution from Volatile Organic Compounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter B--General Volatile Organic Compound Sources
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Division 6: Batch Processes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Section 115.167..................... Exemptions.................... 9/28/2005 7/10/2009 [Insert FR page
number where document
begins].
Section 115.169..................... Counties and Compliance 9/28/2005 7/10/2009 [Insert FR page
Schedules. number where document
begins].
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter E--Solvent-Using Processes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Division 2: Surface Coating Processes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Section 115.427..................... Exemptions.................... 9/28/2005 7/10/2009 [Insert FR page
number where document
begins].
Section 115.429..................... Counties and Compliance 9/28/2005 7/10/2009 [Insert FR page
Schedules. number where document
begins].
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) * * *
* * * * *
EPA-Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Texas SIP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of SIP provision Applicable geographic or submittal/ EPA approval date Comments
nonattainment area effective date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
VOC and NOX RACT demonstration for Beaumont/Port Arthur Area: 9/28/2005 7/10/2009 [Insert FR page
the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. Hardin, Jefferson, and number where document
Orange Counties. begins].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E9-16270 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P