Taking and Importing Marine Mammals: Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Harbor Activities Related to the Delta IV/Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle at Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA, 32565-32570 [E9-16070]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 8, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Based on its review of the comments,
examination of mapping methodologies
currently employed at the State level,
and consultation with the FCC, NTIA
finds that data at the address level, or
as close to the address level as
practicable considering the technology
type being employed, as set out in the
Technical Appendix, should be
collected by each awardee under this
Program and that such data must be
provided to NTIA pursuant to the terms
of the Notice. State broadband maps
developed pursuant to awards under
this Program should display data at the
address level, or as close to the address
level as practicable considering the
technology type being employed and as
provided more fully in the Technical
Appendix.
State Models. NTIA has gathered
information from a variety of sources,
including mapping experts from many
States. Additionally, commenters
provided suggestions on what maps
NTIA should use as models for the
national broadband map.44 After careful
consideration and consultation with the
FCC and other agencies, determined that
none of the suggested State map models
contain all of the data sets necessary for
the national broadband map, but may
prove to be instructive and the source of
valuable ideas. The information
required under the Notice and
Technical Appendix, however, is the
principal source of information for the
national map and guidance for
applicants under this Program.
State Collection of Mapping
Information. State participation is
critical to the national broadband
mapping effort. Commenters expressed
a range of opinions on the information
that States should be required to collect
as a condition of receiving statewide
inventory grants.45 In order to promote
Valley Cooperative Telephone Association at 6
(Apr. 13, 2009) (census tract level per FCC form 477
data collection); Traverse Technologies, Inc. at 2
(Mar. 25, 2009) (providers’ customer service areas).
44 See, e.g., CostQuest/LinkAmerica Alliance at
17 (Alabama map); State of Arizona Government
Information Technology Agency at 9 (Arizona Map);
City and County of San Francisco at 25 (Apr. 13,
2009) (California Map); State of Iowa at 7 (Hawaii
map); Oakland County, Michigan at 7 (Illinois
Map); ConnectKentucky at 3 (Kentucky Map); Joint
Comments at 8, 13 (Massachusetts Map); Diane
Wells at 1, 2 (Apr. 13, 2009) (Minnesota Map); State
of Iowa at 7 (Missouri Map); Joint Response of the
New York State CIO et al. at 4 (New York Map);
Pennsylvania Governor’s Office of Administration
at 8 (North Carolina Map); Pennsylvania Governor’s
Office of Administration at 8 (Pennsylvania Map);
Scott County Mayor Ricky A. Keeton at 1 (Apr. 13,
2009) (Tennessee Map); Stratrum Broadband at 19
(Mar. 31, 2009) (Vermont Map); City of Boston at
9 (Virginia Tech Map); ViaStat, Inc. at 14, 15 (Apr.
13, 2009) (Australia Map); City of Boston at 9 (New
Zealand Map).
45 The RFI included a question regarding the
specific information the States should collect as
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Jul 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
the efficient creation of the State and
national broadband maps, NTIA and
RUS will require that broadband
internet service providers that apply for
infrastructure grants under BTOP and
RUS’ Broadband Initiatives Program
(BIP) agree to provide the data that
awardees under this Program are
required to collect pursuant to the
Technical Appendix. NTIA and RUS
find that the BIP/BTOP program’s
incentive structure should complement
the goals of the State and national
mapping efforts and this requirement
will further facilitate data collection.
Technical Specifications of State
Maps. The BDIA is silent on the
technical specifications that should be
included in each State map. NTIA
sought comment in the RFI on the
specifications that should be required of
State Broadband Data Program grantees
to ensure that the data collected at the
State level can be efficiently
incorporated into the national
broadband map.46 As stated above,
NTIA also consulted with the FCC and
examined mapping methodologies
currently employed at the State level,
regarding the technical specifications
with which awardees should comply in
composing their maps with program
funds.
In response to the RFI, commenters
provided varying insights on the data
sets that should be displayed,47 and the
technical format of the information
conditions of receiving statewide inventory grants
(74 FR 10718). Most commenters agreed that States
should collect information. See, e.g., WISPA at 13.
There was disagreement over whether State data
collection should be a condition to qualify for
grants. See, e.g., Windstream Communications, Inc.
at 27. Some commenters did not think providers
should be required to provide mapping data. See,
e.g., Independent Telephone and
Telecommunications Alliance at 35. Some
commenters recommended that providers be
required to submit data. See, e.g., State of Missouri/
Missouri Public Services Commission at 12.
46 74 FR at 10718.
47 NTIA received comments on the technical
specifications of the map including the following:
Triangle J Council of Governments Cable Broadband
Consortium at 15 (Apr. 13, 2009) (NTIA should
establish a standard template, such as a database
directory, by which information is submitted);
CostQuest/LinkAmerica Alliance at 18 (NTIA
should clearly define certain data sets such as:
Coverage areas, speed and service attributes, quality
of service data, technologies, infrastructure
elements, demand and demographic data price,
deployment costs); The People of the State of
California and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger at
46 (NTIA should establish definitions for address);
National Tribal Telecommunications Association at
3, 4 (NTIA should show customer class (residential,
business, etc.); Joint Response of the New York
State CIO et al. at 11 (data should allow for multiple
demographic overlays); Apex CoVantage at 4 (link
the customer database to the provider database and
link the political data to census data); SEDA—
Council of Governments at 6 (searchable by address
and display in graphical rather than tabular format).
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32565
provided.48 NTIA has determined to
require that data be collected as
specified in the Technical Appendix
attached hereto.
[FR Doc. E9–16103 Filed 7–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XQ00
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals: Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Harbor Activities Related
to the Delta IV/Evolved Expendable
Launch Vehicle at Vandenberg Air
Force Base, CA
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental
harassment authorization; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS has received an
application from United Launch
Alliance (ULA) for an Incidental
Harassment Authorization (IHA) to take
small numbers of marine mammals, by
harassment, incidental to conducting
Delta Mariner operations, cargo
unloading activities, harbor
maintenance dredging, and kelp habitat
mitigation activities related to the Delta
IV/Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle
(Delta IV/EELV) at south Vandenberg
Air Force Base, CA (VAFB). Pursuant to
the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS requests comments on
its proposal to authorize ULA to take, by
Level B harassment only, small numbers
of two species of pinnipeds at south
VAFB beginning August, 2009.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than August 7,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
application should be addressed to
48 Link America Alliance at 17 (NTIA should
follow Federal Geospatial Data Content standards
that included geographic and topographic
information); University of Nebraska at 4 (NTIA
should require GIS software compatibility); The
People of the State of California and Governor
Arnold Schwarzenegger at 47 (NTIA should create
Metadata (data about the data) according to Federal
Geospatial Data Content (FGDC) standards to be
generated after geo-coding); State of Arizona
Government Information Technology Agency at 9
(NTIA should create Metadata (data about the data)
according to ESRI mapping standards); CostQuest/
Link America Alliance at 18, 19 (maps and features
(data layers) should be collected in accordance with
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) standards for
geospatial data).
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
32566
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 8, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225. The mailbox address for
providing email comments is PR1.0648–
XQ00@noaa.gov. Comments sent via email, including all attachments, must
not exceed a 10–megabyte file size.
All comments received are a part of
the public record and will generally be
posted to https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/incidental.htm#applications
without change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential
business information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
A copy of the application containing
a list of the references used in this
document may be obtained by writing to
the address specified above, telephoning
the contact listed below (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT),
or visiting the internet at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular
business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeannine Cody or Candace Nachman,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
(301) 713–2289, or Monica DeAngelis,
NMFS Southwest Region, (562) 980–
3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary)
to allow, upon request, the incidental,
but not intentional, taking of marine
mammals by United States citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Authorization for incidental taking
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses, and if the permissible
methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such takings are set
forth. NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Jul 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ’’...an
impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
with respect to certain activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[ALevel A harassment@]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[‘‘Level B harassment’’].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
establishes a 45–day time limit for
NMFS= review of an application
followed by a 30–day public notice and
comment period on any proposed
authorizations for the incidental
harassment of small numbers of marine
mammals. Not later than 45 days after
the close of the public comment period,
if the Secretary makes the findings set
forth in Section 101(a)(5)(D)(i), the
Secretary shall issue or deny issuance of
the authorization with appropriate
conditions to meet the requirements of
clause 101(a)(5)(D)(ii).
Summary of Request
On June 5, 2009, NMFS received an
application from ULA requesting an
authorization for the harassment of
small numbers of Pacific harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina), California sea lions
(Zalophus californianus), and northern
elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris)
incidental to harbor activities related to
the Delta IV/EELV, including: transport
vessel operations, cargo movement
activities, harbor maintenance dredging,
and kelp habitat mitigation operations.
These activities will support Delta IV/
EELV launch activities from the Space
Launch Complex at VAFB.
NMFS has issued Incidental
Harassment Authorizations (IHAs) to
The Boeing Company, now ULA, on
May 15, 2002 (67 FR 36151, May 23,
2002), May 20, 2003 (68 FR 36540, June
18, 2003), May 20, 2004 (69 FR 29696,
May 25, 2004), May 23, 2005 (70 FR
30697, May 27, 2005), June 20, 2006 (71
FR 36321, June 26, 2006), June 21, 2007
(72 FR 34444, June 22, 2007), and
August 19, 2008 (73 FR 49649, August
22, 2008) each for a one-year period.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ULA did not conduct any dredging
activities between 2003 and 2008, and
accordingly, was not required to
conduct any monitoring activities. For
the 2008 IHA, which expires on August
18, 2009, ULA expects to commence
dredging operations in July, 2009. ULA
will submit a monitoring report 120
days after the expiration of the 2008
IHA.
Description of the Specified Activity
Delta Mariner off-loading operations
and associated cargo movements will
occur a maximum of three times per
year. The activities will take place
within the harbor located within the
VAFB, approximately 2.5 miles (mi)
(4.02 kilometers (km) south of Point
Arguello, CA and approximately 1 mi
(1.61 km) south of the nearest marine
mammal pupping site (i.e., Rocky
Point).
Delta Mariner Operations
The Delta Mariner is a 312–feet (ft)
(95.1–meter (m)) long, 84–ft (25.6–m)
wide steel hull ocean-going vessel
capable of operating at an 8–ft (2.4–m)
draft. The vessel will enter the harbor
stern first, during daylight hours at high
tide, approaching the wharf at less than
0.75 knot. At least one tugboat will
always accompany the Delta Mariner
during visits to the VAFB harbor.
Departure will occur under the same
conditions.
Sources of noise from the Delta
Mariner include ventilating propellers
used for maneuvering the vessel into
position and a brief sound from the
cargo bay door when it becomes
disengaged.
Harbor Maintenance Dredging
To accommodate the Delta Mariner,
the harbor will need to be dredged,
removing up to 5,000 cubic yards of
sediment per dredging. Dredging will
involve the use of heavy equipment,
including a clamshell dredge, dredging
crane, a small tug, dredging barge, dump
trucks, and a skip loader. ULA estimates
that the noise levels emanating from
within 50 ft of the dredging and
construction equipment would range
from 56 to 93 decibels (dB) (A-weighted)
(re 20 FPascals at 1–m). Thus, there is
the potential that an animal hauled out
on the beach or breakwater could hear
the dredging activities. Dredge
operations, from set-up to tear-down,
would continue 24–hours a day for
three to five weeks. Sedimentation
surveys have shown that initial
dredging indicates that maintenance
dredging should be required annually or
twice per year, depending on the
hardware delivery schedule.
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 8, 2009 / Notices
A more detailed description of the
work proposed for 2009–2010 is
contained in the application, which is
available upon request (see ADDRESSES),
and in the Final U.S. Air Force
Environmental Assessment for Harbor
Activities Associated with the Delta IV
Program at Vandenberg Air Force Base
(ENSR International, 2001).
Cargo Movement Activities
The Delta IV/EELV launch vehicle is
comprised of a common booster core
(CBC) and other mechanical elements.
Removal of the CBC from the vessel
requires the use of an elevating platform
transporter (EPT). ULA measured the
EPT’s sound levels within 20 ft of the
exhaust pipe with the engine running at
mid-speed and observed sound levels of
85 dB (re 20 FPascals at 1–m)
(Acentech, 1998). The removal
procedure requires two short
(approximately 1/3 second) beeps of the
horn prior to starting the ignition. The
sound level of the EPT horn ranged from
62 to 70 dB A-weighted at 200 ft (60.9
m) away, and 84 to 112 dB A-weighted
at 25 ft (7.6 m) away.
For cargo other than the CBC, ULA
will use a standard diesel truck tractor
to offload containers containing flight
hardware items from the Delta Mariner.
The tractor would generate a sound
level of approximately 87 dB Aweighted at 50 ft (15.2 m) while in
operational mode. Total docking and
cargo movement activities is estimated
to last approximately no more than 18
hours in good weather.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Marine Mammals Affected by the
Activity
The marine mammal species likely to
be harassed incidental to harbor
activities at south VAFB are the Pacific
harbor seal and the California sea lion.
Pacific Harbor Seals
The marine mammal species likely to
be harassed incidental to harbor
activities at south VAFB are the Pacific
harbor seal and the California sea lion.
The most recent minimum population
estimate of Pacific harbor seals in
California is 31,600 seals (Carretta et al.,
2008). Carretta et al., (2008) report that
net production rates appeared to
decrease from 1982 to 1994 and
hypothesized that the decrease occurred
at the same time as a decrease in
human-caused mortality and may
indicate that the population has reached
its environmental carrying capacity.
The total population of harbor seals
on VAFB is now estimated to be 1,118
(maximum of 500 seals hauled out at
one time on south VAFB) based on
sighting surveys and telemetry data
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Jul 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
(Thorson, 2001). The daily haul-out
behavior of harbor seals along the south
VAFB coastline is primarily dependent
on time of day. The highest number of
seals haul-out at south VAFB between
1100 through 1600 hours. In addition,
haul-out behavior at all sites seems to be
influenced by environmental factors
such as high swell, tide height, and
wind. The combination of all three may
prevent seals from hauling out at most
sites. The number of seals hauled out at
a site can vary greatly from day to day
based on environmental conditions.
Harbor seals occasionally haul out at a
beach 250 ft (76.2 m) west of the south
VAFB harbor and on rocks outside the
harbor breakwater where ULA will be
conducting Delta Mariner operations,
cargo loading, dredging activities, and
reef enhancement.
The maximum number of seals
present during the 2001 dredging of the
harbor was 23 (averaging 7 per
observation period), and the maximum
number hauled out during the 2002
wharf modification activities was 43,
averaging 21 per day when tidal
conditions were favorable for hauling
out. Dredging and reef enhancement did
not occur from 2003–2008.
Several factors affect the seasonal
haul-out behavior of harbor seals
including environmental conditions,
reproduction, and molting. Harbor seal
numbers at VAFB begin to increase in
March during the pupping season
(March to June) as females spend more
time on shore nursing pups. The
number of hauled-out seals is at its
highest during the molt, which occurs
from May through July. During the
molting season, tagged harbor seals at
VAFB increased their time spent on
shore by 22.4 percent; however, all seals
continued to make daily trips to sea to
forage. Molting harbor seals entering the
water because of a disturbance are not
adversely affected in their ability to
molt and do not endure
thermoregulatory stress. During pupping
and molting season, harbor seals at the
south VAFB sites expand into haul-out
areas that are not used the rest of the
year. The number of seals hauled out
begins to decrease in August after the
molt is complete and reaches the lowest
number in late fall and early winter.
California Sea Lions
During the wharf modification
activity in June-July 2002, California sea
lions were observed hauling out on the
breakwater in small numbers (up to 6
individuals). Although this is
considered to be an unusual occurrence
and is possibly related to fish schooling
in the area, ULA included sea lions in
the request.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32567
California sea lions range from British
Columbia to Mexico. The most recent
population estimate for the California
sea lions range is 238,000 (Caretta et al.,
2008). Between 1975 and 2001, the
population growth rate was 5.4–6.1
percent. A 1985–1987 population
survey indicated that most individuals
on the Northern Channel Islands were
on San Miguel Island (SMI), with the
population ranging from 2,235 to over
17,000.
The largest numbers of California sea
lions in the VAFB vicinity occur at Lion
Rock, 0.4 mi (0.64 km) southeast of
Point Sal. This area is approximately 1.5
mi (2.41 km) north of the VAFB
boundary. ULA notes that they have
observed at least 100 sea lions during
any season at this site. The Point
Arguello beaches and the rocky ledges
of South Rocky Point on south VAFB
are haulout areas that may be used by
California sea lions. In 2003, at least 145
sea lions were observed at Rocky Point,
including five pups that did not survive
due to abandonment shortly after birth.
This was thought to be an El Nino effect,
as there had never been any previously
reported sea lion births at VAFB
(Thorson, 2003). Each year, small
groups of sea lions have been observed
heading south along the VAFB coastline
in April and May (Tetra Tech, 1997).
Starting in August, large groups of sea
lions can be seen moving north, in
groups varying in size from 25 to more
than 300 (Roest, 1995). This concurs
with established migration patterns
(Reeves et al., 1992; Roest, 1995).
Juvenile sea lions can be observed
hauled-out with harbor seals along the
South Base sites from July through
September (Tetra Tech, 1997). Starving
and exhausted sub-adult sea lions are
fairly common on central California
beaches during the months of July and
August (Roest, 1995).
During the breeding season, most
California sea lions inhabit southern
California and Mexico. Rookery sites in
southern California are limited to SMI
and the southerly Channel Islands of
San Nicolas, Santa Barbara, and San
Clemente. Breeding season begins in
mid-May, occurring within 10 days of
arrival at the rookeries. Molting occurs
gradually over several months in the
late summer and fall. Because the molt
is not catastrophic, the sea lions can
enter the water to feed.
Male California sea lions migrate
annually. In the spring they migrate
southward to breeding rookeries in the
Channel Islands and Mexico, then
migrate northward in the late summer
following breeding season. Females
appear to remain near the breeding
rookeries. The greatest population on
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
32568
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 8, 2009 / Notices
land occurs in September and October
during the post-breeding dispersal,
although many of the sea lions,
particularly juveniles and sub-adult and
adult males, may move north away from
the Channel Islands.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Other Marine Mammals
Other marine mammal species are
rare to infrequent along the south VAFB
coast during certain times of the year
and are unlikely to be harassed by
ULA’s activities. These four species are:
the northern elephant seal, the northern
fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus),
Guadalupe fur seal (Arctocephalus
townsendi), and Steller sea lion
(Eumetopias jubatus). Northern
elephant seals may occur on VAFB but
do not haul out in the harbor area.
Northern fur seals, Guadalupe fur seals,
and Steller sea lions occur along the
California coast and Northern Channel
Islands but are not likely to be found on
VAFB. Descriptions of the biology and
distribution of these species can be
found in the NMFS Stock Assessment
Reports at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/sars/.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine
Mammals
Acoustic and visual stimuli generated
by the use of heavy equipment during
the Delta Mariner off-loading
operations, dredging, and kelp habitat
mitigation and the increased presence of
personnel, may cause short-term
disturbance to harbor seals and
California sea lions hauled out on the
beach and rocks near south VAFB
harbor. This disturbance from acoustic
and visual stimuli is the principal
means of marine mammal taking
associated with these activities. Based
on the measured sounds of construction
equipment, such as might be used
during ULA’s activities, sound level
intensity decreases proportional to the
square root of the distance from the
source. A dredging crane at the end of
the dock producing 88 dB A-weighted of
noise would be approximately 72 dB Aweighted at the nearest beach or the end
of the breakwater, roughly 250 ft (76.2
m) away. The EPT produces
approximately 85 dB A-weighted,
measured less than 20 ft (6 m) from the
engine exhaust, when the engine is
running at mid speed. The EPT
operation procedure requires two short
beeps of the horn (approximately 1/3 of
a second each) prior to starting the
ignition. Sound level measurements for
the horn ranged from 84–112 dB Aweighted at 25 ft (7.6 m) away and 62–
70 dB A-weighted at 200 ft (61 m) away.
The highest measurement was taken
from the side of the vehicle where the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Jul 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
horn is mounted. Ambient background
noise measured approximately 250 ft
(76.2 m) from the beach was estimated
to be 35–48 dBA (Acentech, 1998; EPA,
1971).
Pinnipeds sometimes show startle
reactions when exposed to sudden brief
sounds. An acoustic stimulus with
sudden onset (such as a sonic boom)
may be analogous to a ‘‘looming’’ visual
stimulus (Hayes and Saif, 1967), which
may elicit flight away from the source
(Berrens et al., 1988). The onset of
operations by a loud sound source, such
as the EPT during CBC off-loading
procedures, may elicit such a reaction.
In addition, the movements of cranes
and dredges may represent a ‘‘looming’’
visual stimulus to seals hauled out in
close proximity. Seals and sea lions
exposed to such acoustic and visual
stimuli may either exhibit a startle
response and/or leave the haul-out site.
According to the MMPA and NMFS’
implementing regulations, if harbor
activities disrupt the behavioral patterns
of harbor seals or sea lions, these
activities would take marine mammals
by Level B harassment. In general, if the
received level of the noise stimulus
exceeds both the background (ambient)
noise level and the auditory threshold of
the animals, and especially if the
stimulus is novel to them, there may be
a behavioral response. The probability
and degree of response will also depend
on the season, the group composition of
the pinnipeds, and the type of activity
in which they are engaged. Minor and
brief responses, such as short-duration
startle or alert reactions, are not likely
to constitute disruption of behavioral
patterns, such as migration, nursing,
breeding, feeding, or sheltering (i.e.,
Level B harassment) and would not
cause injury or mortality to marine
mammals. On the other hand, startle
and alert reactions accompanied by
large-scale movements, such as
stampedes into the water of hundreds of
animals, may rise to the degree of Level
A harassment and could result in injury
of individuals. In addition, such largescale movements by dense aggregations
of marine mammals or at pupping sites
could potentially lead to takes by injury
or death. However, there is no potential
for large-scale movements leading to
serious injury or mortality near the
south VAFB harbor because, on average,
the number of harbor seals hauled out
near the site is less than 30 individuals,
and there is no pupping at nearby sites.
The effects of the harbor activities are
expected to be limited to short-term
startle responses and localized
behavioral changes.
According to the June 2002 dock
modification construction report
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(ENSRI, 2002), the maximum number of
harbor seals hauled out each day ranged
from 23 to 25 animals. There were 15
occasions in which construction noise,
vehicle noise, or noise from a fishing
boat caused the seals to lift their heads.
Flushing only occurred due to fishing
activities, which were unrelated to the
construction activities. The sea lions
were less reactive to the construction
noise than the harbor seals. None of the
construction activities caused any of the
sea lions to leave the jetty rocks, and
there was only one incident of a head
alert reaction.
The report from the December 2002
dredging activities show that the
number of Pacific harbor seals ranged
from zero to 19, and that California sea
lions did not haul out during the
monitoring period. On 10 occasions,
harbor seals showed head alerts,
although two of the alerts were for
disturbances that were not related to the
project. No harbor seals flushed during
the activities on the dock.
For a further discussion of the
anticipated effects of the planned
activities on harbor seals in the area,
please refer to the application, NMFS’
2005 Environmental Assessment (EA),
and the United States Air Force’s
(USAF) 2001 Final EA.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected
to be Harassed
ULA estimates that a maximum of 43
harbor seals per day may be hauled out
near the south VAFB harbor, with a
daily average of 21 seals sighted when
tidal conditions were favorable during
previous dredging operations in the
harbor. Considering the maximum and
average number of seals hauled out per
day, assuming that the seals may be
seen twice a day, and using a maximum
total of 73 operating days in 2009–2010,
NMFS estimates that a maximum of 767
to 1,570 Pacific harbor seals may be
subject to Level B harassment out of a
total estimated population of 31,600.
These numbers are small relative to this
population size (2.4–5 percent).
During wharf modification activities,
a maximum of six California sea lions
were seen hauling out in a single day.
Based on the above-mentioned
calculation, NMFS believes that a
maximum of 219 California sea lions
may be subject to Level B harassment
out of a total estimated population of
238,000. These numbers are small
relative to this population size (less than
0.1 percent).
Up to 10 northern elephant seals
(because they may be in nearby waters)
may be subject to Level B harassment
out of a total estimated population of
124,000 in 2005 (Carretta et al., 2008).
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 8, 2009 / Notices
These numbers are small relative to this
population size (less than 0.01 percent).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Possible Effects of Activities on Marine
Mammal Habitat
ULA does not anticipate any loss or
modification to the habitat used by
Pacific harbor seals or California sea
lions that haul out near the south VAFB
harbor. The harbor seal and sea lion
haul-out sites near south VAFB harbor
are not used as breeding, molting, or
mating sites; therefore, it is not expected
that the activities in the harbor will
have any impact on the ability of Pacific
harbor seals or California sea lions in
the area to reproduce.
ULA anticipates unavoidable kelp
removal during dredging. This habitat
modification will not affect the marine
mammal habitat. However, ULA will
mitigate for the removal of kelp habitat
by placing 150 tons of rocky substrate in
a sandy area between the breakwater
and the mooring dolphins to enhance an
existing artificial reef. This type of
mitigation was implemented by the
Army Corps of Engineers following the
1984 and 1989 dredging. A lush kelp
bed adjacent to the sandy area has
developed from the efforts. The
substrate will consist of approximately
150 sharp-faced boulders, each with a
diameter of about 2 ft (0.61 m) and each
weighing about 1 ton (907 kg). The
boulders will be brought in by truck
from an off-site quarry and loaded by
crane onto a small barge at the wharf.
The barge is towed by a tugboat to a
location along the mooring dolphins
from which a small barge-mounted
crane can place them into the sandy
area. ULA plans to perform the reef
enhancement in conjunction with the
next maintenance dredging event in
order to minimize cost and disturbances
to animals. Noise will be generated by
the trucks delivering the boulders to the
harbor and during the operation of
unloading the boulders onto the barges
and into the water.
Proposed Mitigation Measures
To reduce the potential for
disturbance from visual and acoustic
stimuli associated with the activities,
ULA proposes to undertake the
following marine mammal mitigating
measures:
(1) If activities occur during nighttime
hours, lighting will be turned on before
dusk and left on the entire night to
avoid startling pinnipeds at night.
(2) Activities will be initiated before
dusk.
(3) Construction noises must be kept
constant (i.e., not interrupted by periods
of quiet in excess of 30 minutes) while
pinnipeds are present.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Jul 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
(4) If activities cease for longer than
30 minutes and pinnipeds are in the
area, start-up of activities will include a
gradual increase in noise levels.
(5) A NMFS-approved marine
mammal observer will visually monitor
the harbor seals on the beach adjacent
to the harbor and on rocks for any
flushing or other behaviors as a result of
ULA’s activities (see Monitoring).
(6) The Delta Mariner and
accompanying vessels will enter the
harbor only when the tide is too high for
harbor seals to haul-out on the rocks,
and the vessel will reduce speed to 1.5
to 2 knots (1.5–2.0 nm/hr; 2.8–3.7 km/
hr) once the vessel is within 3 mi (4.83
km) of the harbor. The vessel will enter
the harbor stern first, approaching the
wharf and mooring dolphins at less than
0.75 knot (1.4 km/hr).
(7) As alternate dredge methods are
explored, the dredge contractor may
introduce quieter techniques and
equipment.
Proposed Monitoring Measures
As part of its 2002 application,
Boeing, now ULA, provided a proposed
monitoring plan for assessing impacts to
harbor seals from the activities at south
VAFB harbor and for determining when
mitigation measures should be
employed. NMFS proposes the same
plan for the 2009 IHA.
A NMFS-approved and VAFBdesignated biologically trained observer
will monitor the area for pinnipeds
during all harbor activities. During
nighttime activities, the harbor area will
be illuminated, and the monitor will use
a night vision scope. Monitoring
activities will consist of:
(1) Conducting baseline observation of
pinnipeds in the project area prior to
initiating project activities.
(2) Conducting and recording
observations on pinnipeds in the
vicinity of the harbor for the duration of
the activity occurring when tides are
low enough for pinnipeds to haul out
(2 ft, 0.61 m, or less).
(3) Conducting post-construction
observations of pinniped haul-outs in
the project area to determine whether
animals disturbed by the project
activities return to the haul-out.
Monitoring results from previous
years of these activities have been
reviewed and incorporated into the
analysis of potential effects in this
document.
Proposed Reporting
ULA will notify NMFS two weeks
prior to initiation of each activity. After
each activity is completed, ULA will
provide a report to NMFS within 120
days. This report will provide dates,
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32569
times, durations, and locations of
specific activities, details of pinniped
behavioral observations, and estimates
of numbers of affected pinnipeds and
impacts (behavioral or other). In
addition, the report will include
information on the weather, tidal state,
horizontal visibility, and composition
(species, gender, and age class) and
locations of haul-out group(s). In the
unanticipated event that any cases of
pinniped injury or mortality are judged
to result from these activities, this will
be reported to NMFS immediately.
Negligible Impact Determination
NMFS has preliminarily determined,
provided that the aforementioned
mitigation and monitoring measures are
implemented, that the impact of
conducting a dredging program within
VAFB may result, at worst, in a
temporary modification in behavior
and/or low-level physiological effects
(Level B Harassment) of small numbers
of certain species of marine mammals.
While behavioral and avoidance
reactions may be made by these species
in response to the resultant noise from
the dredging operations, these
behavioral changes are expected to have
a negligible impact on the affected
species and stocks of marine mammals.
While the number of potential
incidental harassment takes will depend
on the distribution and abundance of
marine mammals in the area of dredging
operations, the number of potential
harassment takings is estimated to be
relatively small in light of the
population size.
In addition, no take by death and/or
serious injury is anticipated, and the
potential for temporary or permanent
hearing impairment will be avoided
through the incorporation of the
required mitigation measures described
in this document.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
This action will not affect species
listed under the ESA that are under
NMFS’ jurisdiction. VAFB formally
consulted with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service in 1998 on the possible
take of southern sea otters during
Boeing’s, now ULA, harbor activities at
south VAFB. A Biological Opinion was
issued in August 2001, which
concluded that the EELV Program is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the southern sea otter, and
no injury or mortality is expected. The
activities covered by this IHA are
analyzed in that Biological Opinion, and
this IHA does not modify the action in
a manner that was not previously
analyzed.
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
32570
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 8, 2009 / Notices
National Environmental Policy Act
In 2001, the USAF prepared an EA for
Harbor Activities Associated with the
Delta IV Program at VAFB. In 2005,
NMFS prepared an EA augmenting the
information contained in the USAF EA
and issued a Finding of No Significant
Impact on the issuance of an IHA for
Boeing’s, now ULA, harbor activities in
accordance with section 6.01 of the
NOAA Administrative Order 216–6
(Environmental Review Procedures for
Implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act, May 20,
1999). ULA’s proposed activities and
impacts for 2009–2010 are expected to
be within the scope of NMFS’ 2005 EA
and FONSI.
Preliminary Conclusions
Based on the preceding information,
and provided that the proposed
mitigation and monitoring are
incorporated, NMFS has preliminarily
concluded that the proposed activity
will incidentally take, by level B
behavioral harassment only, small
numbers of marine mammals. There is
no subsistence harvest of marine
mammals in the proposed research area;
therefore, the provision relating to
impacts on certain subsistence activities
is not implicated by this proposed
action. No take by Level A harassment
(injury) or death is anticipated and
harassment takes should be at the
lowest level practicable due to
incorporation of the mitigation
measures proposed in this document.
Northern fur seals, Guadalupe fur
seals, and Steller sea lions are unlikely
to be found in the area and, therefore,
will not be affected. No rookeries,
mating grounds, areas of concentrated
feeding, or other areas of special
significance for marine mammals occur
within or near south VAFB harbor.
Proposed Authorization
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA to
ULA for the Delta IV/EELV Program
during August 2009 to August 2010,
provided that the previously mentioned
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements are incorporated.
Dated: July 2, 2009.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9–16070 Filed 7–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Jul 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Proposed Extension of Approval of
Information Collection; Comment
Request—Safety Standard for
Automatic Residential Garage Door
Operators
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35),
the Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPSC or Commission)
requests comments on a proposed
request for extension of approval of a
collection of information from
manufacturers and importers of
residential garage door operators. The
collection of information consists of
testing and recordkeeping requirements
in certification regulations
implementing the Safety Standard for
Automatic Residential Garage Door
Operators (16 CFR Part 1211). The
Commission will consider all comments
received in response to this notice
before requesting approval of this
extension of a collection of information
from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
DATES: The Office of the Secretary must
receive written comments not later than
September 8, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be captioned ‘‘Residential Garage Door
Operators’’ and e-mailed to the Office of
the Secretary at cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.
Comments may also be sent by facsimile
to (301) 504–0127, or by mail to the
Office of the Secretary, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, 4330 EastWest Highway, Bethesda, Maryland
20814.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about the proposed
collection of information call or write
Linda Glatz, Division of Policy and
Planning, Office of Information
Technology and Technology Services,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814; telephone: (301) 504–7671 or by
e-mail to lglatz@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1990,
Congress enacted legislation requiring
residential garage door operators to
comply with the provisions of a
standard published by Underwriters
Laboratories to protect against
entrapment under provisions of the
Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA)
(15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq.). The entrapment
protection requirements of UL Standard
325 are codified into the Safety
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Standard for Automatic Residential
Garage Door Operators, 16 CFR Part
1211. Automatic residential garage door
operators must comply with the latest
edition of the Commission’s regulations
at 16 CFR Part 1211.
OMB approved the collection of
information concerning the Safety
Standard for Automatic Residential
Garage Door Operators under control
number 3041–0125. OMB’s most recent
approval will expire on October 31,
2009. The Commission now proposes to
request an extension of approval
without changes of this collection of
information.
A. Certification Requirements
Section 203 of Public Law 101–608
requires that UL Standard 325 shall be
considered to be a consumer product
safety standard under section 9 of the
CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2058). Section 14(a) of
the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2063(a)) requires
manufacturers, importers, and private
labelers of a consumer product subject
to a consumer product safety standard
under the CPSA or similar rule, ban,
standard, or regulation under any other
act enforced by the Commission to issue
a certificate stating that the product
complies with all applicable rules, bans,
standards or regulations. Section 14(a)
of the CPSA also requires that the
certificate of compliance must be based
on a test of each product or upon a
reasonable testing program and specify
each such rule, ban, standard or
regulation applicable to the product.
Section 14(b) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C.
2063(b)) authorizes the Commission to
issue regulations to prescribe a
reasonable testing program to support
certificates of compliance with a
consumer product safety standard under
the CPSA or similar rule, ban, standard,
or regulation under any other act
enforced by the Commission. Section
16(b) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2065(b))
authorizes the Commission to issue
rules to require that firms ‘‘establish and
maintain’’ records to permit the
Commission to determine compliance
with rules issued under the authority of
the CPSA.
On December 22, 1992, the
Commission issued rules prescribing
requirements for a reasonable testing
program to support certificates of
compliance with the Safety Standard for
Automatic Residential Garage Door
Operators (57 FR 60449). These
regulations also require manufacturers,
importers, and private labelers of
residential garage door operators to
establish and maintain records to
demonstrate compliance with the
requirements for testing to support
certification of compliance. 16 CFR Part
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32565-32570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16070]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XQ00
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals: Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Harbor Activities Related to the Delta IV/Evolved
Expendable Launch Vehicle at Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; request
for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has received an application from United Launch Alliance
(ULA) for an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to take small
numbers of marine mammals, by harassment, incidental to conducting
Delta Mariner operations, cargo unloading activities, harbor
maintenance dredging, and kelp habitat mitigation activities related to
the Delta IV/Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (Delta IV/EELV) at south
Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA (VAFB). Pursuant to the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS requests comments on its proposal to
authorize ULA to take, by Level B harassment only, small numbers of two
species of pinnipeds at south VAFB beginning August, 2009.
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than August
7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to
[[Page 32566]]
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225. The mailbox address
for providing email comments is PR1.0648-XQ00@noaa.gov. Comments sent
via e-mail, including all attachments, must not exceed a 10-megabyte
file size.
All comments received are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications without change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential
business information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
A copy of the application containing a list of the references used
in this document may be obtained by writing to the address specified
above, telephoning the contact listed below (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT), or visiting the internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be viewed, by appointment,
during regular business hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeannine Cody or Candace Nachman,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2289, or Monica
DeAngelis, NMFS Southwest Region, (562) 980-3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to allow, upon request,
the incidental, but not intentional, taking of marine mammals by United
States citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental taking shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses, and if
the permissible methods of taking and requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings are set forth.
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ''...an
impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on annual rates of recruitment or
survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the United States can apply for an authorization
to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment.
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [ALevel A harassment@]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[``Level B harassment''].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA establishes a 45-day time limit
for NMFS= review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice
and comment period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental
harassment of small numbers of marine mammals. Not later than 45 days
after the close of the public comment period, if the Secretary makes
the findings set forth in Section 101(a)(5)(D)(i), the Secretary shall
issue or deny issuance of the authorization with appropriate conditions
to meet the requirements of clause 101(a)(5)(D)(ii).
Summary of Request
On June 5, 2009, NMFS received an application from ULA requesting
an authorization for the harassment of small numbers of Pacific harbor
seals (Phoca vitulina), California sea lions (Zalophus californianus),
and northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris) incidental to
harbor activities related to the Delta IV/EELV, including: transport
vessel operations, cargo movement activities, harbor maintenance
dredging, and kelp habitat mitigation operations. These activities will
support Delta IV/EELV launch activities from the Space Launch Complex
at VAFB.
NMFS has issued Incidental Harassment Authorizations (IHAs) to The
Boeing Company, now ULA, on May 15, 2002 (67 FR 36151, May 23, 2002),
May 20, 2003 (68 FR 36540, June 18, 2003), May 20, 2004 (69 FR 29696,
May 25, 2004), May 23, 2005 (70 FR 30697, May 27, 2005), June 20, 2006
(71 FR 36321, June 26, 2006), June 21, 2007 (72 FR 34444, June 22,
2007), and August 19, 2008 (73 FR 49649, August 22, 2008) each for a
one-year period. ULA did not conduct any dredging activities between
2003 and 2008, and accordingly, was not required to conduct any
monitoring activities. For the 2008 IHA, which expires on August 18,
2009, ULA expects to commence dredging operations in July, 2009. ULA
will submit a monitoring report 120 days after the expiration of the
2008 IHA.
Description of the Specified Activity
Delta Mariner off-loading operations and associated cargo movements
will occur a maximum of three times per year. The activities will take
place within the harbor located within the VAFB, approximately 2.5
miles (mi) (4.02 kilometers (km) south of Point Arguello, CA and
approximately 1 mi (1.61 km) south of the nearest marine mammal pupping
site (i.e., Rocky Point).
Delta Mariner Operations
The Delta Mariner is a 312-feet (ft) (95.1-meter (m)) long, 84-ft
(25.6-m) wide steel hull ocean-going vessel capable of operating at an
8-ft (2.4-m) draft. The vessel will enter the harbor stern first,
during daylight hours at high tide, approaching the wharf at less than
0.75 knot. At least one tugboat will always accompany the Delta Mariner
during visits to the VAFB harbor. Departure will occur under the same
conditions.
Sources of noise from the Delta Mariner include ventilating
propellers used for maneuvering the vessel into position and a brief
sound from the cargo bay door when it becomes disengaged.
Harbor Maintenance Dredging
To accommodate the Delta Mariner, the harbor will need to be
dredged, removing up to 5,000 cubic yards of sediment per dredging.
Dredging will involve the use of heavy equipment, including a clamshell
dredge, dredging crane, a small tug, dredging barge, dump trucks, and a
skip loader. ULA estimates that the noise levels emanating from within
50 ft of the dredging and construction equipment would range from 56 to
93 decibels (dB) (A-weighted) (re 20 FPascals at 1-m). Thus, there is
the potential that an animal hauled out on the beach or breakwater
could hear the dredging activities. Dredge operations, from set-up to
tear-down, would continue 24-hours a day for three to five weeks.
Sedimentation surveys have shown that initial dredging indicates that
maintenance dredging should be required annually or twice per year,
depending on the hardware delivery schedule.
[[Page 32567]]
A more detailed description of the work proposed for 2009-2010 is
contained in the application, which is available upon request (see
ADDRESSES), and in the Final U.S. Air Force Environmental Assessment
for Harbor Activities Associated with the Delta IV Program at
Vandenberg Air Force Base (ENSR International, 2001).
Cargo Movement Activities
The Delta IV/EELV launch vehicle is comprised of a common booster
core (CBC) and other mechanical elements. Removal of the CBC from the
vessel requires the use of an elevating platform transporter (EPT). ULA
measured the EPT's sound levels within 20 ft of the exhaust pipe with
the engine running at mid-speed and observed sound levels of 85 dB (re
20 FPascals at 1-m) (Acentech, 1998). The removal procedure requires
two short (approximately 1/3 second) beeps of the horn prior to
starting the ignition. The sound level of the EPT horn ranged from 62
to 70 dB A-weighted at 200 ft (60.9 m) away, and 84 to 112 dB A-
weighted at 25 ft (7.6 m) away.
For cargo other than the CBC, ULA will use a standard diesel truck
tractor to offload containers containing flight hardware items from the
Delta Mariner. The tractor would generate a sound level of
approximately 87 dB A-weighted at 50 ft (15.2 m) while in operational
mode. Total docking and cargo movement activities is estimated to last
approximately no more than 18 hours in good weather.
Marine Mammals Affected by the Activity
The marine mammal species likely to be harassed incidental to
harbor activities at south VAFB are the Pacific harbor seal and the
California sea lion.
Pacific Harbor Seals
The marine mammal species likely to be harassed incidental to
harbor activities at south VAFB are the Pacific harbor seal and the
California sea lion. The most recent minimum population estimate of
Pacific harbor seals in California is 31,600 seals (Carretta et al.,
2008). Carretta et al., (2008) report that net production rates
appeared to decrease from 1982 to 1994 and hypothesized that the
decrease occurred at the same time as a decrease in human-caused
mortality and may indicate that the population has reached its
environmental carrying capacity.
The total population of harbor seals on VAFB is now estimated to be
1,118 (maximum of 500 seals hauled out at one time on south VAFB) based
on sighting surveys and telemetry data (Thorson, 2001). The daily haul-
out behavior of harbor seals along the south VAFB coastline is
primarily dependent on time of day. The highest number of seals haul-
out at south VAFB between 1100 through 1600 hours. In addition, haul-
out behavior at all sites seems to be influenced by environmental
factors such as high swell, tide height, and wind. The combination of
all three may prevent seals from hauling out at most sites. The number
of seals hauled out at a site can vary greatly from day to day based on
environmental conditions. Harbor seals occasionally haul out at a beach
250 ft (76.2 m) west of the south VAFB harbor and on rocks outside the
harbor breakwater where ULA will be conducting Delta Mariner
operations, cargo loading, dredging activities, and reef enhancement.
The maximum number of seals present during the 2001 dredging of the
harbor was 23 (averaging 7 per observation period), and the maximum
number hauled out during the 2002 wharf modification activities was 43,
averaging 21 per day when tidal conditions were favorable for hauling
out. Dredging and reef enhancement did not occur from 2003-2008.
Several factors affect the seasonal haul-out behavior of harbor
seals including environmental conditions, reproduction, and molting.
Harbor seal numbers at VAFB begin to increase in March during the
pupping season (March to June) as females spend more time on shore
nursing pups. The number of hauled-out seals is at its highest during
the molt, which occurs from May through July. During the molting
season, tagged harbor seals at VAFB increased their time spent on shore
by 22.4 percent; however, all seals continued to make daily trips to
sea to forage. Molting harbor seals entering the water because of a
disturbance are not adversely affected in their ability to molt and do
not endure thermoregulatory stress. During pupping and molting season,
harbor seals at the south VAFB sites expand into haul-out areas that
are not used the rest of the year. The number of seals hauled out
begins to decrease in August after the molt is complete and reaches the
lowest number in late fall and early winter.
California Sea Lions
During the wharf modification activity in June-July 2002,
California sea lions were observed hauling out on the breakwater in
small numbers (up to 6 individuals). Although this is considered to be
an unusual occurrence and is possibly related to fish schooling in the
area, ULA included sea lions in the request.
California sea lions range from British Columbia to Mexico. The
most recent population estimate for the California sea lions range is
238,000 (Caretta et al., 2008). Between 1975 and 2001, the population
growth rate was 5.4-6.1 percent. A 1985-1987 population survey
indicated that most individuals on the Northern Channel Islands were on
San Miguel Island (SMI), with the population ranging from 2,235 to over
17,000.
The largest numbers of California sea lions in the VAFB vicinity
occur at Lion Rock, 0.4 mi (0.64 km) southeast of Point Sal. This area
is approximately 1.5 mi (2.41 km) north of the VAFB boundary. ULA notes
that they have observed at least 100 sea lions during any season at
this site. The Point Arguello beaches and the rocky ledges of South
Rocky Point on south VAFB are haulout areas that may be used by
California sea lions. In 2003, at least 145 sea lions were observed at
Rocky Point, including five pups that did not survive due to
abandonment shortly after birth. This was thought to be an El Nino
effect, as there had never been any previously reported sea lion births
at VAFB (Thorson, 2003). Each year, small groups of sea lions have been
observed heading south along the VAFB coastline in April and May (Tetra
Tech, 1997). Starting in August, large groups of sea lions can be seen
moving north, in groups varying in size from 25 to more than 300
(Roest, 1995). This concurs with established migration patterns (Reeves
et al., 1992; Roest, 1995). Juvenile sea lions can be observed hauled-
out with harbor seals along the South Base sites from July through
September (Tetra Tech, 1997). Starving and exhausted sub-adult sea
lions are fairly common on central California beaches during the months
of July and August (Roest, 1995).
During the breeding season, most California sea lions inhabit
southern California and Mexico. Rookery sites in southern California
are limited to SMI and the southerly Channel Islands of San Nicolas,
Santa Barbara, and San Clemente. Breeding season begins in mid-May,
occurring within 10 days of arrival at the rookeries. Molting occurs
gradually over several months in the late summer and fall. Because the
molt is not catastrophic, the sea lions can enter the water to feed.
Male California sea lions migrate annually. In the spring they
migrate southward to breeding rookeries in the Channel Islands and
Mexico, then migrate northward in the late summer following breeding
season. Females appear to remain near the breeding rookeries. The
greatest population on
[[Page 32568]]
land occurs in September and October during the post-breeding
dispersal, although many of the sea lions, particularly juveniles and
sub-adult and adult males, may move north away from the Channel
Islands.
Other Marine Mammals
Other marine mammal species are rare to infrequent along the south
VAFB coast during certain times of the year and are unlikely to be
harassed by ULA's activities. These four species are: the northern
elephant seal, the northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus), Guadalupe
fur seal (Arctocephalus townsendi), and Steller sea lion (Eumetopias
jubatus). Northern elephant seals may occur on VAFB but do not haul out
in the harbor area. Northern fur seals, Guadalupe fur seals, and
Steller sea lions occur along the California coast and Northern Channel
Islands but are not likely to be found on VAFB. Descriptions of the
biology and distribution of these species can be found in the NMFS
Stock Assessment Reports at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine Mammals
Acoustic and visual stimuli generated by the use of heavy equipment
during the Delta Mariner off-loading operations, dredging, and kelp
habitat mitigation and the increased presence of personnel, may cause
short-term disturbance to harbor seals and California sea lions hauled
out on the beach and rocks near south VAFB harbor. This disturbance
from acoustic and visual stimuli is the principal means of marine
mammal taking associated with these activities. Based on the measured
sounds of construction equipment, such as might be used during ULA's
activities, sound level intensity decreases proportional to the square
root of the distance from the source. A dredging crane at the end of
the dock producing 88 dB A-weighted of noise would be approximately 72
dB A-weighted at the nearest beach or the end of the breakwater,
roughly 250 ft (76.2 m) away. The EPT produces approximately 85 dB A-
weighted, measured less than 20 ft (6 m) from the engine exhaust, when
the engine is running at mid speed. The EPT operation procedure
requires two short beeps of the horn (approximately 1/3 of a second
each) prior to starting the ignition. Sound level measurements for the
horn ranged from 84-112 dB A-weighted at 25 ft (7.6 m) away and 62-70
dB A-weighted at 200 ft (61 m) away. The highest measurement was taken
from the side of the vehicle where the horn is mounted. Ambient
background noise measured approximately 250 ft (76.2 m) from the beach
was estimated to be 35-48 dBA (Acentech, 1998; EPA, 1971).
Pinnipeds sometimes show startle reactions when exposed to sudden
brief sounds. An acoustic stimulus with sudden onset (such as a sonic
boom) may be analogous to a ``looming'' visual stimulus (Hayes and
Saif, 1967), which may elicit flight away from the source (Berrens et
al., 1988). The onset of operations by a loud sound source, such as the
EPT during CBC off-loading procedures, may elicit such a reaction. In
addition, the movements of cranes and dredges may represent a
``looming'' visual stimulus to seals hauled out in close proximity.
Seals and sea lions exposed to such acoustic and visual stimuli may
either exhibit a startle response and/or leave the haul-out site.
According to the MMPA and NMFS' implementing regulations, if
harbor activities disrupt the behavioral patterns of harbor seals or
sea lions, these activities would take marine mammals by Level B
harassment. In general, if the received level of the noise stimulus
exceeds both the background (ambient) noise level and the auditory
threshold of the animals, and especially if the stimulus is novel to
them, there may be a behavioral response. The probability and degree of
response will also depend on the season, the group composition of the
pinnipeds, and the type of activity in which they are engaged. Minor
and brief responses, such as short-duration startle or alert reactions,
are not likely to constitute disruption of behavioral patterns, such as
migration, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering (i.e., Level B
harassment) and would not cause injury or mortality to marine mammals.
On the other hand, startle and alert reactions accompanied by large-
scale movements, such as stampedes into the water of hundreds of
animals, may rise to the degree of Level A harassment and could result
in injury of individuals. In addition, such large-scale movements by
dense aggregations of marine mammals or at pupping sites could
potentially lead to takes by injury or death. However, there is no
potential for large-scale movements leading to serious injury or
mortality near the south VAFB harbor because, on average, the number of
harbor seals hauled out near the site is less than 30 individuals, and
there is no pupping at nearby sites. The effects of the harbor
activities are expected to be limited to short-term startle responses
and localized behavioral changes.
According to the June 2002 dock modification construction report
(ENSRI, 2002), the maximum number of harbor seals hauled out each day
ranged from 23 to 25 animals. There were 15 occasions in which
construction noise, vehicle noise, or noise from a fishing boat caused
the seals to lift their heads. Flushing only occurred due to fishing
activities, which were unrelated to the construction activities. The
sea lions were less reactive to the construction noise than the harbor
seals. None of the construction activities caused any of the sea lions
to leave the jetty rocks, and there was only one incident of a head
alert reaction.
The report from the December 2002 dredging activities show that the
number of Pacific harbor seals ranged from zero to 19, and that
California sea lions did not haul out during the monitoring period. On
10 occasions, harbor seals showed head alerts, although two of the
alerts were for disturbances that were not related to the project. No
harbor seals flushed during the activities on the dock.
For a further discussion of the anticipated effects of the planned
activities on harbor seals in the area, please refer to the
application, NMFS' 2005 Environmental Assessment (EA), and the United
States Air Force's (USAF) 2001 Final EA.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected to be Harassed
ULA estimates that a maximum of 43 harbor seals per day may be
hauled out near the south VAFB harbor, with a daily average of 21 seals
sighted when tidal conditions were favorable during previous dredging
operations in the harbor. Considering the maximum and average number of
seals hauled out per day, assuming that the seals may be seen twice a
day, and using a maximum total of 73 operating days in 2009-2010, NMFS
estimates that a maximum of 767 to 1,570 Pacific harbor seals may be
subject to Level B harassment out of a total estimated population of
31,600. These numbers are small relative to this population size (2.4-5
percent).
During wharf modification activities, a maximum of six California
sea lions were seen hauling out in a single day. Based on the above-
mentioned calculation, NMFS believes that a maximum of 219 California
sea lions may be subject to Level B harassment out of a total estimated
population of 238,000. These numbers are small relative to this
population size (less than 0.1 percent).
Up to 10 northern elephant seals (because they may be in nearby
waters) may be subject to Level B harassment out of a total estimated
population of 124,000 in 2005 (Carretta et al., 2008).
[[Page 32569]]
These numbers are small relative to this population size (less than
0.01 percent).
Possible Effects of Activities on Marine Mammal Habitat
ULA does not anticipate any loss or modification to the habitat
used by Pacific harbor seals or California sea lions that haul out near
the south VAFB harbor. The harbor seal and sea lion haul-out sites near
south VAFB harbor are not used as breeding, molting, or mating sites;
therefore, it is not expected that the activities in the harbor will
have any impact on the ability of Pacific harbor seals or California
sea lions in the area to reproduce.
ULA anticipates unavoidable kelp removal during dredging. This
habitat modification will not affect the marine mammal habitat.
However, ULA will mitigate for the removal of kelp habitat by placing
150 tons of rocky substrate in a sandy area between the breakwater and
the mooring dolphins to enhance an existing artificial reef. This type
of mitigation was implemented by the Army Corps of Engineers following
the 1984 and 1989 dredging. A lush kelp bed adjacent to the sandy area
has developed from the efforts. The substrate will consist of
approximately 150 sharp-faced boulders, each with a diameter of about 2
ft (0.61 m) and each weighing about 1 ton (907 kg). The boulders will
be brought in by truck from an off-site quarry and loaded by crane onto
a small barge at the wharf. The barge is towed by a tugboat to a
location along the mooring dolphins from which a small barge-mounted
crane can place them into the sandy area. ULA plans to perform the reef
enhancement in conjunction with the next maintenance dredging event in
order to minimize cost and disturbances to animals. Noise will be
generated by the trucks delivering the boulders to the harbor and
during the operation of unloading the boulders onto the barges and into
the water.
Proposed Mitigation Measures
To reduce the potential for disturbance from visual and acoustic
stimuli associated with the activities, ULA proposes to undertake the
following marine mammal mitigating measures:
(1) If activities occur during nighttime hours, lighting will be
turned on before dusk and left on the entire night to avoid startling
pinnipeds at night.
(2) Activities will be initiated before dusk.
(3) Construction noises must be kept constant (i.e., not
interrupted by periods of quiet in excess of 30 minutes) while
pinnipeds are present.
(4) If activities cease for longer than 30 minutes and pinnipeds
are in the area, start-up of activities will include a gradual increase
in noise levels.
(5) A NMFS-approved marine mammal observer will visually monitor
the harbor seals on the beach adjacent to the harbor and on rocks for
any flushing or other behaviors as a result of ULA's activities (see
Monitoring).
(6) The Delta Mariner and accompanying vessels will enter the
harbor only when the tide is too high for harbor seals to haul-out on
the rocks, and the vessel will reduce speed to 1.5 to 2 knots (1.5-2.0
nm/hr; 2.8-3.7 km/hr) once the vessel is within 3 mi (4.83 km) of the
harbor. The vessel will enter the harbor stern first, approaching the
wharf and mooring dolphins at less than 0.75 knot (1.4 km/hr).
(7) As alternate dredge methods are explored, the dredge contractor
may introduce quieter techniques and equipment.
Proposed Monitoring Measures
As part of its 2002 application, Boeing, now ULA, provided a
proposed monitoring plan for assessing impacts to harbor seals from the
activities at south VAFB harbor and for determining when mitigation
measures should be employed. NMFS proposes the same plan for the 2009
IHA.
A NMFS-approved and VAFB-designated biologically trained observer
will monitor the area for pinnipeds during all harbor activities.
During nighttime activities, the harbor area will be illuminated, and
the monitor will use a night vision scope. Monitoring activities will
consist of:
(1) Conducting baseline observation of pinnipeds in the project
area prior to initiating project activities.
(2) Conducting and recording observations on pinnipeds in the
vicinity of the harbor for the duration of the activity occurring when
tides are low enough for pinnipeds to haul out
(2 ft, 0.61 m, or less).
(3) Conducting post-construction observations of pinniped haul-outs
in the project area to determine whether animals disturbed by the
project activities return to the haul-out.
Monitoring results from previous years of these activities have
been reviewed and incorporated into the analysis of potential effects
in this document.
Proposed Reporting
ULA will notify NMFS two weeks prior to initiation of each
activity. After each activity is completed, ULA will provide a report
to NMFS within 120 days. This report will provide dates, times,
durations, and locations of specific activities, details of pinniped
behavioral observations, and estimates of numbers of affected pinnipeds
and impacts (behavioral or other). In addition, the report will include
information on the weather, tidal state, horizontal visibility, and
composition (species, gender, and age class) and locations of haul-out
group(s). In the unanticipated event that any cases of pinniped injury
or mortality are judged to result from these activities, this will be
reported to NMFS immediately.
Negligible Impact Determination
NMFS has preliminarily determined, provided that the aforementioned
mitigation and monitoring measures are implemented, that the impact of
conducting a dredging program within VAFB may result, at worst, in a
temporary modification in behavior and/or low-level physiological
effects (Level B Harassment) of small numbers of certain species of
marine mammals. While behavioral and avoidance reactions may be made by
these species in response to the resultant noise from the dredging
operations, these behavioral changes are expected to have a negligible
impact on the affected species and stocks of marine mammals.
While the number of potential incidental harassment takes will
depend on the distribution and abundance of marine mammals in the area
of dredging operations, the number of potential harassment takings is
estimated to be relatively small in light of the population size.
In addition, no take by death and/or serious injury is anticipated,
and the potential for temporary or permanent hearing impairment will be
avoided through the incorporation of the required mitigation measures
described in this document.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
This action will not affect species listed under the ESA that are
under NMFS' jurisdiction. VAFB formally consulted with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service in 1998 on the possible take of southern sea
otters during Boeing's, now ULA, harbor activities at south VAFB. A
Biological Opinion was issued in August 2001, which concluded that the
EELV Program is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the
southern sea otter, and no injury or mortality is expected. The
activities covered by this IHA are analyzed in that Biological Opinion,
and this IHA does not modify the action in a manner that was not
previously analyzed.
[[Page 32570]]
National Environmental Policy Act
In 2001, the USAF prepared an EA for Harbor Activities Associated
with the Delta IV Program at VAFB. In 2005, NMFS prepared an EA
augmenting the information contained in the USAF EA and issued a
Finding of No Significant Impact on the issuance of an IHA for
Boeing's, now ULA, harbor activities in accordance with section 6.01 of
the NOAA Administrative Order 216-6 (Environmental Review Procedures
for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act, May 20, 1999).
ULA's proposed activities and impacts for 2009-2010 are expected to be
within the scope of NMFS' 2005 EA and FONSI.
Preliminary Conclusions
Based on the preceding information, and provided that the proposed
mitigation and monitoring are incorporated, NMFS has preliminarily
concluded that the proposed activity will incidentally take, by level B
behavioral harassment only, small numbers of marine mammals. There is
no subsistence harvest of marine mammals in the proposed research area;
therefore, the provision relating to impacts on certain subsistence
activities is not implicated by this proposed action. No take by Level
A harassment (injury) or death is anticipated and harassment takes
should be at the lowest level practicable due to incorporation of the
mitigation measures proposed in this document.
Northern fur seals, Guadalupe fur seals, and Steller sea lions are
unlikely to be found in the area and, therefore, will not be affected.
No rookeries, mating grounds, areas of concentrated feeding, or other
areas of special significance for marine mammals occur within or near
south VAFB harbor.
Proposed Authorization
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA to ULA for the Delta IV/EELV Program
during August 2009 to August 2010, provided that the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements are
incorporated.
Dated: July 2, 2009.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-16070 Filed 7-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S