Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Falcon 2000EX Airplanes, 32417-32419 [E9-15855]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Bulletin 777–27A0059, Revision 1, dated
August 18, 2005; are considered acceptable
for compliance with the corresponding
actions specified in paragraphs (g), (h), and
(i) of this AD.
Credit for Hard-Time Replacement of HSTA
(k) Any HSTA overhauled within the
compliance times specified in paragraphs (g),
(h), and (i) of this AD or before the effective
date of this AD—as part of a ‘‘hard-time’’
replacement program that includes removal
of the HSTA from the airplane and overhaul
of the stabilizer ballscrew in accordance with
original equipment manufacturer component
maintenance manual instructions—meets the
intent of one detailed inspection, one
freeplay inspection, and one lubrication of
the HSTA. Therefore, any such HSTA is
considered acceptable for compliance with
the initial accomplishment of the actions
specified in paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of this
AD, and repetitions of those actions may be
determined from the performance date of that
overhaul.
Parts Installation
(l) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install, on any airplane, a
horizontal stabilizer trim actuator that is not
in a ‘‘known serviceable condition’’ as
defined in Note 6, section 3.A., of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 777–27A0059,
Revision 2, dated January 15, 2009; unless a
detailed inspection, freeplay measurement,
and lubrication of that actuator are performed
in accordance with paragraphs (g), (h), and (i)
of this AD, as applicable.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(m)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN:
Kelly McGuckin, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S,
FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6490; fax (425) 917–6590; has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(n) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin
777–27A0059, Revision 2, dated January 15,
2009, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1, fax 206–766–
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Jul 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_
register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, WA, on June 24, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–15639 Filed 7–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0380; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–153–AD; Amendment
39–15959; AD 2009–14–09]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Model Falcon 2000EX Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
An internal review of design data has
shown that the web of the left hand side (LH)
stringer 13 near frame 8 might have been
improperly trimmed on a few aircraft.
If not corrected, possible crack initiations
could occur in the upper stringer web, and
therefore could impair the structural strength
of the adjacent door stop. This latent failure
could ultimately lead to the loss of
redundancy of the door stops, thereby
affecting the structural integrity of the
fuselage.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 12, 2009.
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of August 12, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PO 00000
32417
Sfmt 4700
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on April 27, 2009 (74 FR
19027). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
An internal review of design data has
shown that the web of the left hand side (LH)
stringer 13 near frame 8 might have been
improperly trimmed on a few aircraft.
If not corrected, possible crack initiations
could occur in the upper stringer web, and
therefore could impair the structural strength
of the adjacent door stop. This latent failure
could ultimately lead to the loss of
redundancy of the door stops, thereby
affecting the structural integrity of the
fuselage.
Computational analysis has revealed a
substantial reduced fatigue life for the
stringer abutting onto the improperly
trimmed web and has determined the need
for an inspection and repair action no later
than the first ‘‘C’’ check.
To address this unsafe condition, the
present Airworthiness Directive (AD)
mandates an inspection and a conditional
rework or replacement of the web of the LH
stringer 13 between frames 7 and 8.
Required actions include measuring the
trimmed length of the web, inspecting
for any sharp and unprotected edges of
the web, and doing corrective actions if
necessary. Corrective actions include
reworking the web and applying
protection to the web, or replacing the
web, if improperly trimmed. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
32418
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
12 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 1 workhour per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $960, or $80 per product.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Jul 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2009–14–09 Dassault Aviation:
Amendment 39–15959. Docket No.
FAA–2009–0380; Directorate Identifier
2008–NM–153–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective August 12, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model
Falcon 2000EX airplanes, certificated in any
category, serial numbers 102 through 124
inclusive.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53: Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
An internal review of design data has
shown that the web of the left hand side (LH)
stringer 13 near frame 8 might have been
improperly trimmed on a few aircraft.
If not corrected, possible crack initiations
could occur in the upper stringer web, and
therefore could impair the structural strength
of the adjacent door stop. This latent failure
could ultimately lead to the loss of
redundancy of the door stops, thereby
affecting the structural integrity of the
fuselage.
Computational analysis has revealed a
substantial reduced fatigue life for the
stringer abutting onto the improperly
trimmed web and has determined the need
for an inspection and repair action no later
than the first ‘‘C’’ check.
To address this unsafe condition, the
present Airworthiness Directive (AD)
mandates an inspection and a conditional
rework or replacement of the web of the LH
stringer 13 between frames 7 and 8.
Required actions include measuring the
trimmed length of the web, inspecting for any
sharp and unprotected edges of the web, and
doing corrective actions if necessary.
Corrective actions include reworking the web
and applying protection to the web, or
replacing the web, if improperly trimmed.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) At the later of the times in paragraphs
(f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD: Perform a
detailed visual inspection to detect any sharp
and unprotected edges of the web of the LH
stringer 13 between frames 7 and 8, and
measure the trimmed length of the web, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Dassault Mandatory Service
Bulletin F2000EX–178, dated July 1, 2008.
(i) Before the accumulation of 3,750 total
flight cycles, or within 74 months since the
date of issuance of the original French
airworthiness certificate or the date of
issuance of the original French export
certificate of airworthiness, whichever occurs
first.
(ii) Within 6 months after the effective date
of this AD.
(2) If, during the inspection and
measurement required by paragraph (f)(1) of
this AD, any sharp or unprotected edge is
found, or if the trimmed length is 1.57 inches
(40 mm) or greater, before further flight, do
all applicable corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Dassault Mandatory Service
Bulletin F2000EX–178, dated July 1, 2008.
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2008–0143, dated July 31, 2008;
and Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin
F2000EX–178, dated July 1, 2008; for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Dassault Mandatory
Service Bulletin F2000EX–178, dated July 1,
2008, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box
2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey 07606;
telephone 201–440–6700; Internet https://
www.dassaultfalcon.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Jul 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, WA, on June 25, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–15855 Filed 7–7–09; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0263; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–137–AD; Amendment
39–15957; AD 2009–14–07]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Model Mystere-Falcon 20–C5, 20–D5,
20–E5, and 20–F5 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
issued following the discovery of hot air
leaks when operating the wing anti-icing
system. The seals Part Number (P/N)
MS29513–325, near the de-icing valves
(12H1) and (12H2) in frame 33 area, do not
have the proper temperature rating.
The consequences, in the area of the hot air
leak, are risks of ignition of potential
hydraulic leaks.
*
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 12, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of August 12, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
32419
Sfmt 4700
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on March 26, 2009 (74 FR
13147). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
issued following the discovery of hot air
leaks when operating the wing anti-icing
system. The seals Part Number (P/N)
MS29513–325, near the de-icing valves
(12H1) and (12H2) in frame 33 area, do not
have the proper temperature rating.
The consequences, in the area of the hot air
leak, are risks of ignition of potential
hydraulic leaks.
The purpose of this AD is to verify that
seals with correct temperature rating have
been installed on Mystere-Falcon 20-()5
airplanes.
The corrective action includes replacing
the left and right seals near de-icing
valves (12H1) and (12H2) in frame area
33. You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comment received.
Request To Refer to Current Revision of
the Service Bulletin
Dassault Falcon Jet Corporation
(Dassault) requests that we revise the
NPRM to refer to Revision 1 of Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin F20–766,
dated June 24, 2008, in this AD. We
referred to Dassault Service Bulletin
F20–766, dated October 31, 2005, in the
NPRM as the appropriate source of
service information for doing the
proposed requirements.
We agree. Dassault Mandatory Service
Bulletin F20–766, Revision 1, dated
June 24, 2008, does not specify any
additional action for airplanes on which
the required actions have been
accomplished in accordance with the
original issue of Dassault Service
Bulletin F20–766, dated October 31,
2005. Also, paragraph 1.D. of Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin F20–766,
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 8, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32417-32419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15855]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0380; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-153-AD;
Amendment 39-15959; AD 2009-14-09]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Falcon 2000EX Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
An internal review of design data has shown that the web of the
left hand side (LH) stringer 13 near frame 8 might have been
improperly trimmed on a few aircraft.
If not corrected, possible crack initiations could occur in the
upper stringer web, and therefore could impair the structural
strength of the adjacent door stop. This latent failure could
ultimately lead to the loss of redundancy of the door stops, thereby
affecting the structural integrity of the fuselage.
* * * * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective August 12, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 12,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on April 27, 2009 (74
FR 19027). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
An internal review of design data has shown that the web of the
left hand side (LH) stringer 13 near frame 8 might have been
improperly trimmed on a few aircraft.
If not corrected, possible crack initiations could occur in the
upper stringer web, and therefore could impair the structural
strength of the adjacent door stop. This latent failure could
ultimately lead to the loss of redundancy of the door stops, thereby
affecting the structural integrity of the fuselage.
Computational analysis has revealed a substantial reduced
fatigue life for the stringer abutting onto the improperly trimmed
web and has determined the need for an inspection and repair action
no later than the first ``C'' check.
To address this unsafe condition, the present Airworthiness
Directive (AD) mandates an inspection and a conditional rework or
replacement of the web of the LH stringer 13 between frames 7 and 8.
Required actions include measuring the trimmed length of the web,
inspecting for any sharp and unprotected edges of the web, and doing
corrective actions if necessary. Corrective actions include reworking
the web and applying protection to the web, or replacing the web, if
improperly trimmed. You may obtain further information by examining the
MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or
[[Page 32418]]
on the determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 12 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $960, or $80 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2009-14-09 Dassault Aviation: Amendment 39-15959. Docket No. FAA-
2009-0380; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-153-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
12, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model Falcon 2000EX airplanes,
certificated in any category, serial numbers 102 through 124
inclusive.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
An internal review of design data has shown that the web of the
left hand side (LH) stringer 13 near frame 8 might have been
improperly trimmed on a few aircraft.
If not corrected, possible crack initiations could occur in the
upper stringer web, and therefore could impair the structural
strength of the adjacent door stop. This latent failure could
ultimately lead to the loss of redundancy of the door stops, thereby
affecting the structural integrity of the fuselage.
Computational analysis has revealed a substantial reduced
fatigue life for the stringer abutting onto the improperly trimmed
web and has determined the need for an inspection and repair action
no later than the first ``C'' check.
To address this unsafe condition, the present Airworthiness
Directive (AD) mandates an inspection and a conditional rework or
replacement of the web of the LH stringer 13 between frames 7 and 8.
Required actions include measuring the trimmed length of the
web, inspecting for any sharp and unprotected edges of the web, and
doing corrective actions if necessary. Corrective actions include
reworking the web and applying protection to the web, or replacing
the web, if improperly trimmed.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) At the later of the times in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and
(f)(1)(ii) of this AD: Perform a detailed visual inspection to
detect any sharp and unprotected edges of the web of the LH stringer
13 between frames 7 and 8, and measure the trimmed length of the
web, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin F2000EX-178, dated July 1, 2008.
(i) Before the accumulation of 3,750 total flight cycles, or
within 74 months since the date of issuance of the original French
airworthiness certificate or the date of issuance of the original
French export certificate of airworthiness, whichever occurs first.
(ii) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD.
(2) If, during the inspection and measurement required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, any sharp or unprotected edge is found,
or if the trimmed length is 1.57 inches (40 mm) or greater, before
further flight, do all applicable corrective actions, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault Mandatory Service
Bulletin F2000EX-178, dated July 1, 2008.
[[Page 32419]]
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or
lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2008-0143, dated July 31, 2008; and Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin F2000EX-178, dated July 1, 2008; for
related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin F2000EX-
178, dated July 1, 2008, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey
07606; telephone 201-440-6700; Internet https://www.dassaultfalcon.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, WA, on June 25, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-15855 Filed 7-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P