Modification of Class E Airspace; Montrose, CO, 32073-32074 [E9-15876]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 7, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Ontario, L4W 5N6, Canada, 1–800–463–
6727, or go to https://www.shopcsa.ca/
onlinestore/welcome.asp.
(1) CAN/CSA–C747–94 (‘‘CAN/CSA–
C747’’) (Reaffirmed 2005), Energy
Efficiency Test Methods for Single- and
Three-Phase Small Motors, IBR
approved for § 431.444.
(2) [Reserved]
(c) IEEE. Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers, Inc., 445 Hoes
Lane, P.O. Box 1331, Piscataway, NJ
08855–1331, 1–800–678–IEEE (4333), or
go to https://www.ieee.org/web/
publications/home/.
(1) IEEE Std 112TM–2004 (Revision of
IEEE Std 112–1996) (‘‘IEEE Std 112’’),
IEEE Standard Test Procedure for
Polyphase Induction Motors and
Generators, approved February 9, 2004,
IBR approved for § 431.444.
(2) IEEE Std 114–2001TM (Revision of
IEEE Std 114–1982) (‘‘IEEE Std 114’’),
IEEE Standard Test Procedure for
Single-Phase Induction Motors,
approved December 6, 2001, IBR
approved for § 431.444.
§ 431.444 Test procedures for the
measurement of energy efficiency.
(a) Scope. Pursuant to section
346(b)(1) of EPCA, this section provides
the test procedures for measuring,
pursuant to EPCA, the efficiency of
small electric motors pursuant to EPCA.
(42 U.S.C. 6317(b)(1)) For purposes of
this Part 431 and EPCA, the test
procedures for measuring the efficiency
of small electric motors shall be the test
procedures specified in § 431.444(b).
(b) Testing and Calculations.
Determine the energy efficiency and
losses by using one of the following test
methods:
(1) Single-phase small electric motors:
either IEEE Std 114, (incorporated by
reference, see § 431.443), or CAN/CSA
C747, (incorporated by reference, see
§ 431.443);
(2) Polyphase small electric motors
less than or equal to 1 horsepower
(0.746 kW): IEEE Std 112 (incorporated
by reference, see § 431.443), Test
Method A; or
(3) Polyphase small electric motors
greater than 1 horsepower (0.746 kW):
IEEE Std 112 (incorporated by reference,
see § 431.443), Test Method B.
§ 431.445 Determination of small electric
motor efficiency.
(a) Scope. When a party determines
the energy efficiency of a small electric
motor to comply with an obligation
imposed on it by or pursuant to Part A–
1 of Title III of EPCA, 42 U.S.C. 6311–
6317, this section applies.
(b) Provisions applicable to all small
electric motors—(1) General
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jul 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
requirements. The average full-load
efficiency of each basic model of small
electric motor must be determined
either by testing in accordance with
§ 431.444 of this subpart, or by
application of an alternative efficiency
determination method (AEDM) that
meets the requirements of paragraphs
(a)(2) and (3) of this section, provided,
however, that an AEDM may be used to
determine the average full-load
efficiency of one or more of a
manufacturer’s basic models only if the
average full-load efficiency of at least
five of its other basic models is
determined through testing.
(2) Alternative efficiency
determination method. An AEDM
applied to a basic model must be:
(i) Derived from a mathematical
model that represents the mechanical
and electrical characteristics of that
basic model, and
(ii) Based on engineering or statistical
analysis, computer simulation or
modeling, or other analytic evaluation
of performance data.
(3) Substantiation of an alternative
efficiency determination method. Before
an AEDM is used, its accuracy and
reliability must be substantiated as
follows:
(i) The AEDM must be applied to at
least five basic models that have been
tested in accordance with § 431.444; and
(ii) The predicted total power loss for
each such basic model, calculated by
applying the AEDM, must be within
plus or minus 10 percent of the mean
total power loss determined from the
testing of that basic model.
(4) Subsequent verification of an
AEDM. (i) Each manufacturer that has
used an AEDM under this section shall
have available for inspection by the
Department of Energy records showing
the method or methods used; the
mathematical model, the engineering or
statistical analysis, computer simulation
or modeling, and other analytic
evaluation of performance data on
which the AEDM is based; complete test
data, product information, and related
information that the manufacturer has
generated or acquired pursuant to
paragraph (a)(3) of this section; and the
calculations used to determine the
efficiency and total power losses of each
basic model to which the AEDM was
applied.
(ii) If requested by the Department,
the manufacturer shall conduct
simulations to predict the performance
of particular basic models of small
electric motors specified by the
Department, analyses of previous
simulations conducted by the
manufacturer, sample testing of basic
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32073
models selected by the Department, or
a combination of the foregoing.
(c) Additional testing requirements—
(1) Selection of basic models for testing
if an AEDM is to be applied.
(i) A manufacturer must select basic
models for testing in accordance with
the criteria that follow:
(A) Two of the basic models must be
among the five basic models with the
highest unit volumes of production by
the manufacturer in the prior year, or
during the prior 12-month period before
the effective date of the energy
efficiency standard, whichever is later,
and in identifying these five basic
models, any small electric motor that
does not comply with § 431.446 shall be
excluded from consideration;
(B) The basic models should be of
different horsepower ratings without
duplication;
(C) At least one basic model should be
selected from each of the frame number
series for the designs of small electric
motors for which the AEDM is to be
used; and
(D) Each basic model should have the
lowest nominal full-load efficiency
among the basic models with the same
rating (‘‘rating’’ as used here has the
same meaning as it has in the definition
of ‘‘basic model’’).
(ii) If it is impossible for a
manufacturer to select basic models for
testing in accordance with all of these
criteria, the criteria shall be given
priority in the order in which they are
listed. Within the limits imposed by the
criteria, basic models shall be selected
randomly.
(2) [RESERVED]
Energy Conservation Standards
§ 431.446 Small electric motors energy
conservation standards and their effective
dates.
[Reserved]
[FR Doc. E9–15795 Filed 7–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0042; Airspace
Docket No. 09–ANM–1]
Modification of Class E Airspace;
Montrose, CO
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This action will modify Class
E airspace at Montrose Regional Airport,
E:\FR\FM\07JYR1.SGM
07JYR1
32074
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 7, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Montrose, CO. Additional controlled
airspace is necessary to accommodate
aircraft using the Instrument Landing
System (ILS) Localizer/Distance
Measuring Equipment (LOC/DME)
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedure (SIAP) at Montrose Regional
Airport, Montrose, CO. This will
improve the safety of Instrument Flight
Rules (IFR) aircraft executing the ILS
LOC/DME SIAP at Montrose Regional
Airport, Montrose, CO.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC,
October 22, 2009. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057;
telephone (425) 203–4537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On April 13, 2009, the FAA published
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking to establish
additional controlled airspace at
Montrose, CO (74 FR 16812). Interested
parties were invited to participate in
this rulemaking effort by submitting
written comments on the proposal to the
FAA. No comments were received.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.9S signed October 3, 2008,
and effective October 31, 2008, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
part 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in that
Order.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by
amending the Class E airspace at
Montrose, CO. Additional controlled
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface is necessary to
accommodate IFR aircraft executing ILS
LOC/DME approach procedures at
Montrose Regional Airport, Montrose,
CO.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jul 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAAs authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106 discusses the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it establishes
additional controlled airspace at
Montrose Regional Airport, Montrose,
CO.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
■
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7.2-mile
radius of the Montrose Regional Airport and
within 4.3 miles northeast and 8.3 miles
southwest of the Montrose VOR/DME 313°
and 133° radials extending from 7.2 miles
southeast to 21.4 miles northwest of the
VOR/DME, and within 4 miles each side of
the Montrose VOR/DME 360° radial
extending to 13.6 miles north of the VOR/
DME; and that airspace extending upward
from 1,200 feet above the surface within an
area bounded by a point beginning at lat.
38°40′00″ N., long. 108°46′00″ W.; to lat.
38°25′00″ N., long. 108°42′30″ W.; to lat.
37°58′00″ N., long. 108°10′00″ W.; to lat.
38°09′00″ N., long. 107°35′00″ W.; to lat.
38°43′00″ N., long. 107°39′30″ W.; to lat.
38°51′30″ N., long. 107°41′00″ W.; to lat.
39°01′00″ N., long. 107°47′00″ W.; to lat.
39°01′00″ N., long. 108°09′00″ W.; thence to
the point of beginning.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on June 26,
2009.
H. Steve Karnes,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. E9–15876 Filed 7–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0253; Airspace
Docket No. 09–ANM–2]
Modification of Class E Airspace; Twin
Falls, ID
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
SUMMARY: This action will modify Class
E airspace at Twin Falls, ID. Additional
controlled airspace is necessary to
accommodate aircraft using a new VHF
Omni-Directional Radio Range (VOR)
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedure (SIAP) at Twin Falls Joslin
Field—Magic Valley Regional, Twin
Falls, ID. This will improve the safety of
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) aircraft
executing the new VOR SIAP at Twin
Falls Joslin Field—Magic Valley
Regional, Twin Falls, ID.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC,
October 22, 2009. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
signed October 3, 2008, and effective
October 31, 2008 is amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005. Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM CO, E5 Montrose, CO [Modify]
Montrose Regional Airport, CO
(Lat. 38°30′35″ N., long. 107°53′39″ W.)
Montrose VOR/DME
(Lat. 38°30′23″ N., long. 107°53′57″ W.)
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\07JYR1.SGM
07JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 7, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32073-32074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15876]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0042; Airspace Docket No. 09-ANM-1]
Modification of Class E Airspace; Montrose, CO
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action will modify Class E airspace at Montrose Regional
Airport,
[[Page 32074]]
Montrose, CO. Additional controlled airspace is necessary to
accommodate aircraft using the Instrument Landing System (ILS)
Localizer/Distance Measuring Equipment (LOC/DME) Standard Instrument
Approach Procedure (SIAP) at Montrose Regional Airport, Montrose, CO.
This will improve the safety of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) aircraft
executing the ILS LOC/DME SIAP at Montrose Regional Airport, Montrose,
CO.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, October 22, 2009. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone (425) 203-4537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On April 13, 2009, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to establish additional controlled
airspace at Montrose, CO (74 FR 16812). Interested parties were invited
to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments
on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.
Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9S signed October 3, 2008, and effective October 31,
2008, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in that Order.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by amending the Class E airspace at Montrose, CO. Additional
controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface is
necessary to accommodate IFR aircraft executing ILS LOC/DME approach
procedures at Montrose Regional Airport, Montrose, CO.
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAAs authority to issue
rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code.
Subtitle 1, Section 106 discusses the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency's authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it establishes
additional controlled airspace at Montrose Regional Airport, Montrose,
CO.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, signed October 3, 2008, and effective October 31,
2008 is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005. Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.
* * * * *
ANM CO, E5 Montrose, CO [Modify]
Montrose Regional Airport, CO
(Lat. 38[deg]30'35'' N., long. 107[deg]53'39'' W.)
Montrose VOR/DME
(Lat. 38[deg]30'23'' N., long. 107[deg]53'57'' W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.2-mile radius of the Montrose Regional Airport and within
4.3 miles northeast and 8.3 miles southwest of the Montrose VOR/DME
313[deg] and 133[deg] radials extending from 7.2 miles southeast to
21.4 miles northwest of the VOR/DME, and within 4 miles each side of
the Montrose VOR/DME 360[deg] radial extending to 13.6 miles north
of the VOR/DME; and that airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet
above the surface within an area bounded by a point beginning at
lat. 38[deg]40'00'' N., long. 108[deg]46'00'' W.; to lat.
38[deg]25'00'' N., long. 108[deg]42'30'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]58'00''
N., long. 108[deg]10'00'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]09'00'' N., long.
107[deg]35'00'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]43'00'' N., long. 107[deg]39'30''
W.; to lat. 38[deg]51'30'' N., long. 107[deg]41'00'' W.; to lat.
39[deg]01'00'' N., long. 107[deg]47'00'' W.; to lat. 39[deg]01'00''
N., long. 108[deg]09'00'' W.; thence to the point of beginning.
* * * * *
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on June 26, 2009.
H. Steve Karnes,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. E9-15876 Filed 7-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P