Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Potomac River, Between MD and VA, 31180-31182 [E9-15559]
Download as PDF
31180
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 30, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
outweigh the costs. We find that this final
rule will enhance public health and promote
the safer use of OTC acetaminophen and
NSAID drug products.
6. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
This economic analysis, together with
other relevant sections of this document,
serves as our final regulatory flexibility
analysis, as required under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. For our preliminary
regulatory flexibility analysis, we calculated
the average annualized compliance costs for
firms in each size category and determined
that the average annualized compliance costs
totaled less than 1 percent of average receipts
for all firm sizes. In 2007 dollars, the
estimated annualized present value cost per
SKU is $492 (i.e., $11.1 million divided by
22,500 SKUs) using a 7 percent discount rate
over 10 years, and $416 per SKU ($9.4
million divided by 22,500 SKUs) using a 3
percent discount rate over 10 years. For
private label SKUs only, the annualized
present value cost per SKU is $321 ($3.6
million divided by 11,250 SKUs) using a 7
percent discount rate over 10 years, or $271
per private label SKU ($3.0 divided by 11,250
SKUs) using a 3 percent discount rate over
10 years. Similar to the proposed rule, the
average annualized compliance costs of the
final rule remain under 1 percent of average
receipts for all firm sizes. Therefore, we
tentatively conclude that this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
2. On page 19407, in the second
column, add the following reference:
57. Eastern Research Group, Inc.,
‘‘Addendum to the Cost Benefit Analysis:
Final Internal Analgesic, Antipyretic and
Antirheumatic Drug Products Rulemaking,’’
Final Report, July 30, 2008.
§ 201.326
[Corrected]
3. On page 19408, in the third column,
correct the first sentence in
§ 201.326(a)(2)(iii)(A) to read as follows:
‘‘Stomach bleeding warning [heading in
bold type]: This product contains an
NSAID, which may cause severe
stomach bleeding.’’
■ 4. On page 19409, in the first column,
correct the first sentence in
§ 201.326(a)(2)(iv)(A)(1) to read as
follows: ‘‘Stomach bleeding warning
[heading in bold type]: This product
contains an NSAID, which may cause
severe stomach bleeding.’’
■ 5. On page 19409, in the second
column, correct the first sentence in
§ 201.326(a)(2)(v)(A) to read as follows:
‘‘Stomach bleeding warning [heading in
bold type]: This product contains an
NSAID, which may cause severe
stomach bleeding.’’
rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES
■
Dated: June 23, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–15403 Filed 6–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:04 Jun 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG–2008–1216]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Potomac River, Between MD and VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing
the drawbridge operation regulations of
the new Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I–
95) Bridge, mile 103.8, across the
Potomac River between Alexandria, VA
and Oxon Hill, MD. This rule is being
made in an effort to minimize the
potential for major regional vehicular
traffic impacts and consequences during
bridge openings of the draw span while
still providing for reasonable needs of
marine traffic.
DATES: This rule is effective July 30,
2009.
Comments and related
materials received from the public, as
well as documents mentioned in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG–2008–
1216 and are available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at two locations: The Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, and the
Commander (dpb), Fifth Coast Guard
District, Federal Building, 1st Floor, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, VA
23704–5004 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr., Bridge
Administrator, Fifth Coast Guard
District, at 757–398–6222. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Regulatory Information
On February 9, 2009, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled, ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
Regulations; Potomac River, Between
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
MD and VA’’ (74 FR 6359). We received
no comments on the published NPRM.
No public meeting was requested, and
none was held.
Background and Purpose
On July 2, 2008, we published a
temporary regulation entitled
‘‘Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Potomac River, Between MD and VA,’’
in the Federal Register (73 FR 37806).
While construction continued, the
temporary rule allowed the drawbridge
to remain closed-to-navigation each day
from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. until and
including March 1, 2009.
The MD State Highway
Administration and the VA Department
of Transportation, co-owners of the
drawbridge, requested to permanently
maintain the Woodrow Wilson Bridge in
the closed-to-navigation position each
day from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. This request
was made in an effort to minimize the
potential for major regional vehicular
traffic impacts and consequences during
bridge openings.
In reaching our decision to implement
this request, we balanced the large
volume of vehicular traffic moving
across the bridge against the lack of
large commercial vessel traffic seeking
to use the bridge during this period. The
Woodrow Wilson Bridge is part of the
Capital Beltway Interstate Highway
System. It is a critical component of that
system for both local and regional traffic
moving into, around, and through the
Washington, DC metro area. Bridge
openings cause significant traffic delays.
From a river-user standpoint, the
coordinators for the construction of the
new Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project
have received no requests from boaters
or mariners to open the bridge during
the 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. timeframe since
the first temporary deviation was issued
in late June 2006. In fact, no requests
have been received for an opening of the
new bridge at all since July 3, 2006.
Finally, the coordinators have received
no complaints on the 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
restriction. This rule will affect only
vessels with mast heights of 75 feet or
greater. Furthermore, all operators of
affected vessels with mast heights
greater than 75 feet will be able to
request an opening of the drawbridge in
the ‘‘off-peak’’ vehicle traffic hours
(evening and overnight) in accordance
with 33 CFR 117.255(a). As discussed in
the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
currently, 33 CFR 117.255(a)(2)(i) states
(paraphrasing) that the drawbridge need
not open for the passage of a
commercial vessel, Monday through
Friday, 5 a.m. to 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. to
8 p.m. This final rule connects the two
time periods by extending the operating
E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM
30JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 30, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
regulation to cover the entire period
from 5 a.m. until 8 p.m. We considered
the alternative of narrowing the mid-day
window from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. to make
it a shorter window. However, since
there were no vessel requests for this
time period at all, we rejected this
option. We also considered taking no
action at all; however, due to the high
volume of vehicle traffic using the
bridge, we rejected this option as well.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no
comments to the NPRM. Therefore, we
will implement a final rule with no
changes to the NPRM. If commercial
vessel traffic patterns change, we will
revisit the operating requirements.
Questions or concerns regarding the
opening of the Woodrow Wilson
Memorial Bridge may be directed to the
person identified in the For Further
Information Section of this final rule.
Requests to change the operating
schedule for this bridge should be sent
to the Fifth District Commander in
Portsmouth, Virginia (See 33 CFR
117.8).
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. We reached this conclusion
based on the fact that these changes
have only a minimal impact on
maritime traffic transiting through the
bridge. All operators of affected vessels
with mast heights greater than 75 feet
will be able to request an opening of the
drawbridge in the ‘‘off-peak’’ vehicle
traffic hours (evening and overnight) in
accordance with 33 CFR 117.255(a), and
mariners can plan their trips in
accordance with the scheduled bridge
openings to minimize delays.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:04 Jun 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
31181
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule could affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit through the
bridge, between the hours of 10 a.m. and
2 p.m., Monday through Friday.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This rule only adds
minimal restrictions to the movement of
navigation. All operators of affected
vessels with mast heights greater than
75 feet will be able to request an
opening of the drawbridge in the ‘‘offpeak’’ vehicle traffic hours (evening and
overnight) in accordance with 33 CFR
117.255(a). Additionally, mariners who
plan their transits in accordance with
the scheduled bridge openings can
minimize delay.
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. Small businesses may send
comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise
determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement
Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards.
The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM
30JNR1
31182
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 30, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES
■
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:04 Jun 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. In § 117.255 revise paragraph
(a)(2)(i) to read as follows:
■
§ 117.255
Potomac River.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) From Monday through Friday
(except Federal holidays), 5 a.m. to 8
p.m.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 25, 2009.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9–15559 Filed 6–26–09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 668, 686, 690, and 691
[Docket ID ED–2009–OPE–0001]
RIN 1840–AC96
Student Assistance General
Provisions; Teacher Education
Assistance for College and Higher
Education (TEACH) Grant Program;
Federal Pell Grant Program; Academic
Competitiveness Grant Program and
National Science and Mathematics
Access To Retain Talent Grant
Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Interim final rule; correction.
SUMMARY: The Department of Education
is correcting an interim final regulation
that was published in the Federal
Register on May 1, 2009. These interim
final regulations implemented
provisions of the Higher Education Act
of 1965 (HEA), as amended by the
Ensuring Continued Access to Student
Loans Act of 2008 (ECASLA) and the
Higher Education Opportunity Act of
2008 (HEOA), related to the Academic
Competitiveness Grant (ACG) and
National Science and Mathematics
Access to Retain Talent Grant (National
SMART Grant) Programs.
DATES: Effective July 1, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sophia McArdle, Office of
Postsecondary Education, U.S.
Department of Education, 1990 K Street,
NW., Room 8019, Washington, DC
20006–8544. Telephone: (202) 219–
7078.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain this document in an accessible
format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under this section.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Delegation of Authority: The Secretary
of Education has delegated authority to
Daniel T. Madzelan, Director,
Forecasting and Policy Analysis for the
Office of Postsecondary Education, to
perform the functions of the Assistant
Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
■ In FR Doc. E9–10094, appearing on
page 20210 in the Federal Register on
May 1, 2009, the following corrections
are made:
§ 691.63
[Corrected]
1. On page 20224, in the second
column, in § 691.63, in amendment 19,
instruction G is corrected to read as
follows: ‘‘Revising paragraph (c)(3).’’
■ 2. On page 20224, in the second
column, the regulatory text of § 691.63
is corrected by setting out the revised
paragraph (c)(3) as follows:
■
§ 691.63 Calculation of a grant for a
payment period.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Multiplying his or her ACG or
National SMART Grant annual award
determined under paragraph (c)(2) of
this section by the following fraction as
applicable: or
In a program using semesters or
trimesters—
E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM
30JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31180-31182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15559]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG-2008-1216]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Potomac River, Between MD and
VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the drawbridge operation
regulations of the new Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I-95) Bridge, mile
103.8, across the Potomac River between Alexandria, VA and Oxon Hill,
MD. This rule is being made in an effort to minimize the potential for
major regional vehicular traffic impacts and consequences during bridge
openings of the draw span while still providing for reasonable needs of
marine traffic.
DATES: This rule is effective July 30, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and related materials received from the public, as
well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG-2008-1216 and are available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. This material is also available for
inspection or copying at two locations: The Docket Management Facility
(M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, and the Commander (dpb), Fifth Coast Guard District, Federal
Building, 1st Floor, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, VA 23704-5004
between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call Waverly W. Gregory, Jr., Bridge Administrator, Fifth Coast Guard
District, at 757-398-6222. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On February 9, 2009, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled, ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Potomac River,
Between MD and VA'' (74 FR 6359). We received no comments on the
published NPRM. No public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
On July 2, 2008, we published a temporary regulation entitled
``Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Potomac River, Between MD and VA,''
in the Federal Register (73 FR 37806). While construction continued,
the temporary rule allowed the drawbridge to remain closed-to-
navigation each day from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. until and including March 1,
2009.
The MD State Highway Administration and the VA Department of
Transportation, co-owners of the drawbridge, requested to permanently
maintain the Woodrow Wilson Bridge in the closed-to-navigation position
each day from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. This request was made in an effort to
minimize the potential for major regional vehicular traffic impacts and
consequences during bridge openings.
In reaching our decision to implement this request, we balanced the
large volume of vehicular traffic moving across the bridge against the
lack of large commercial vessel traffic seeking to use the bridge
during this period. The Woodrow Wilson Bridge is part of the Capital
Beltway Interstate Highway System. It is a critical component of that
system for both local and regional traffic moving into, around, and
through the Washington, DC metro area. Bridge openings cause
significant traffic delays.
From a river-user standpoint, the coordinators for the construction
of the new Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project have received no requests from
boaters or mariners to open the bridge during the 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
timeframe since the first temporary deviation was issued in late June
2006. In fact, no requests have been received for an opening of the new
bridge at all since July 3, 2006. Finally, the coordinators have
received no complaints on the 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. restriction. This rule
will affect only vessels with mast heights of 75 feet or greater.
Furthermore, all operators of affected vessels with mast heights
greater than 75 feet will be able to request an opening of the
drawbridge in the ``off-peak'' vehicle traffic hours (evening and
overnight) in accordance with 33 CFR 117.255(a). As discussed in the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, currently, 33 CFR 117.255(a)(2)(i)
states (paraphrasing) that the drawbridge need not open for the passage
of a commercial vessel, Monday through Friday, 5 a.m. to 10 a.m. and 2
p.m. to 8 p.m. This final rule connects the two time periods by
extending the operating
[[Page 31181]]
regulation to cover the entire period from 5 a.m. until 8 p.m. We
considered the alternative of narrowing the mid-day window from 10 a.m.
to 2 p.m. to make it a shorter window. However, since there were no
vessel requests for this time period at all, we rejected this option.
We also considered taking no action at all; however, due to the high
volume of vehicle traffic using the bridge, we rejected this option as
well.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments to the NPRM. Therefore, we
will implement a final rule with no changes to the NPRM. If commercial
vessel traffic patterns change, we will revisit the operating
requirements. Questions or concerns regarding the opening of the
Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge may be directed to the person identified
in the For Further Information Section of this final rule. Requests to
change the operating schedule for this bridge should be sent to the
Fifth District Commander in Portsmouth, Virginia (See 33 CFR 117.8).
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. We reached this conclusion based on the
fact that these changes have only a minimal impact on maritime traffic
transiting through the bridge. All operators of affected vessels with
mast heights greater than 75 feet will be able to request an opening of
the drawbridge in the ``off-peak'' vehicle traffic hours (evening and
overnight) in accordance with 33 CFR 117.255(a), and mariners can plan
their trips in accordance with the scheduled bridge openings to
minimize delays.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule could affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit through the bridge, between the hours of 10 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule only adds minimal restrictions to the movement of navigation. All
operators of affected vessels with mast heights greater than 75 feet
will be able to request an opening of the drawbridge in the ``off-
peak'' vehicle traffic hours (evening and overnight) in accordance with
33 CFR 117.255(a). Additionally, mariners who plan their transits in
accordance with the scheduled bridge openings can minimize delay.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action''
[[Page 31182]]
under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has
not designated it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does
not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards.
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (32)(e) of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 117.255 revise paragraph (a)(2)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.255 Potomac River.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) From Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays), 5 a.m. to
8 p.m.
* * * * *
Dated: June 25, 2009.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard Commander, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E9-15559 Filed 6-26-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P