Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the New Haven-Hartford and New London, CT, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas, 31153-31154 [E9-15474]

Download as PDF 31153 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 124 Tuesday, June 30, 2009 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 5 CFR Part 532 RIN 3206–AL83 Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the New Haven-Hartford and New London, CT, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a final rule to define the New Haven-Hartford and New London, CT, appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas by county rather than by city and town boundaries. Defining the New England FWS wage areas by primarily considering county boundaries provides greater consistency in how OPM defines FWS wage areas and improves the ability to make direct data comparisons with Census Bureau data. The final rule defines the New Haven-Hartford wage area to include Hartford and New Haven Counties, CT, as the survey area and Fairfield, Litchfield, Middlesex, and Tolland Counties, CT, as the area of application and the New London wage area to include New London County, CT, as the survey area and Windham County, CT, as the area of application. DATES: Effective Date: This regulation is effective on June 30, 2009. Applicability date for the New HavenHartford, CT, wage area: This rule applies for the full-scale wage survey scheduled to begin in April 2011. Applicability date for the New London, CT, wage area: This rule applies for the full-scale wage survey scheduled to begin in September 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606–2838; email pay-performance-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606–4264. VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:04 Jun 29, 2009 Jkt 217001 On March 24, 2009, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued a proposed rule (74 FR 12280) to make the following three changes: (1) Define the New Haven-Hartford and New London, CT, appropriated fund Federal Wage System wage areas by county rather than by city and town boundaries; (2) Define the New Haven-Hartford wage area to include Hartford and New Haven Counties, CT, as the survey area and Fairfield, Litchfield, Middlesex, and Tolland Counties, CT, as the area of application; and (3) Define the New London wage area to include New London County, CT, as the survey area and Windham County, CT, as the area of application. These changes are based on consensus recommendations of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee. The proposed rule had a 30-day comment period, during which OPM received no comments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I certify that these regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they will affect only Federal agencies and employees. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of Information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages. John Berry, Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management amends 5 CFR part 532 as follows: ■ PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS 1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. 2. In appendix C to subpart B, the wage area listing for the State of Connecticut is amended by revising the listings for New Haven-Hartford and New London; for the State of Massachusetts, by revising the listing for Central and Western Massachusetts; and for the State of Rhode Island, by revising PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532— Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas * * * * * Connecticut New Haven-Hartford Survey Area Connecticut: Hartford New Haven Area of Application. Survey area plus: Connecticut: Fairfield Litchfield Middlesex Tolland New London Survey Area Connecticut: New London Area of Application. Survey area plus: Connecticut: Windham * Regulatory Flexibility Act ■ the listing for Narragansett Bay, to read as follows: * * * * Massachusetts * * * * * Central and Western Massachusetts Survey Area Massachusetts: The following cities and towns in: Hampden County: Agawam Chicopee East Longmeadow Feeding Hills Hampden Holyoke Longmeadow Ludlow Monson Palmer Southwick Springfield Three Rivers Westfield West Springfield Wilbraham Hampshire County: Easthampton Granby Hadley Northampton South Hadley Worcester County: Warren West Warren Area of Application. Survey area plus: Massachusetts: Berkshire Franklin E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM 30JNR1 31154 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 30, 2009 / Rules and Regulations Worcester (except Blackstone and Millville) The following cities and towns in: Hampshire County: Amherst Belchertown Chesterfield Cummington Goshen Hatfield Huntington Middlefield Pelham Plainfield Southampton Ware Westhampton Williamsburg Worthington Hampden County: Blandford Brimfield Chester Granville Holland Montgomery Russell Tolland Wales Middlesex County: Ashby Shirley Townsend New Hampshire: Belknap Carroll Cheshire Grafton Hillsborough Merrimack Sullivan Vermont: Addison Bennington Caledonia Essex Lamoille Orange Orleans Rutland Washington Windham Windsor rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES * * * * Rhode Island Narragansett Bay Survey Area Rhode Island: Bristol Newport The following cities and towns: Kent County: Anthony Coventry East Greenwich Greene Warwick West Warwick Providence County: Ashton Burrillville Central Falls Cranston VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:04 Jun 29, 2009 Jkt 217001 * Cumberland Cumberland Hill East Providence Esmond Forestdale Greenville Harrisville Johnston Lincoln Manville Mapleville North Providence North Smithfield Oakland Pascoag Pawtucket Providence Saylesville Slatersville Smithfield Valley Falls Wallum Lake Woonsocket Washington County: Davisville Galilee Lafayette Narragansett North Kingstown Point Judith Quonset Point Saunderstown Slocum Massachusetts: The following cities and towns: Bristol County: Attleboro Fall River North Attleboro Rehoboth Seekonk Somerset Swansea Westport Norfolk County: Caryville Plainville South Bellingham Worcester County: Blackstone Millville Area of Application. Survey area plus: Rhode Island: The following cities and towns in: Kent County: West Greenwich Providence County: Foster Glocester Scituate Washington County: Charlestown Exeter Hopkinton New Shoreham Richmond South Kingstown Westerly Massachusetts: The following cities and towns in: Bristol County: Acushnet Berkley PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Dartmouth Dighton Fairhaven Freetown Mansfield New Bedford Norton Raynham Taunton * * * * * [FR Doc. E9–15474 Filed 6–29–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325–39–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 7 CFR Parts 301 and 319 [Docket No. APHIS–2006–0189] RIN 0579–AC67 Movement of Hass Avocados From Areas Where Mexican Fruit Fly or Sapote Fruit Fly Exist AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are amending the regulations to relieve certain restrictions regarding the movement of Hass variety avocados. Specifically, we are amending our domestic quarantine regulations to provide for the interstate movement, with a certificate, of Hass avocados from areas in the United States quarantined for Mexican fruit fly or sapote fruit fly, provided that the fruit is safeguarded after harvest in accordance with specific measures. We are also amending our foreign quarantine regulations to remove trapping and bait spray treatment requirements related to Anastrepha spp. fruit flies for imported Hass avocados from Michoacan, Mexico. These actions are warranted in light of research demonstrating the limited host status of Hass avocados to various species of fruit flies in the genus Anastrepha, including Mexican fruit fly and sapote fruit fly. By amending both our domestic and foreign quarantine regulations, we are making them consistent with each other and relieving restrictions for Mexican Hass avocado producers. In addition, this action provides an alternative means for Hass avocados to be moved interstate if the avocados originate from a Mexican fruit fly or sapote fruit fly quarantined area in the United States. DATES: Effective Date: July 30, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding the interstate movement of Hass avocados from Mexican fruit fly and sapote fruit fly quarantined areas, E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM 30JNR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31153-31154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15474]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 30, 2009 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 31153]]



OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 532

RIN 3206-AL83


Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the New Haven-Hartford 
and New London, CT, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas

AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a 
final rule to define the New Haven-Hartford and New London, CT, 
appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas by county rather 
than by city and town boundaries. Defining the New England FWS wage 
areas by primarily considering county boundaries provides greater 
consistency in how OPM defines FWS wage areas and improves the ability 
to make direct data comparisons with Census Bureau data. The final rule 
defines the New Haven-Hartford wage area to include Hartford and New 
Haven Counties, CT, as the survey area and Fairfield, Litchfield, 
Middlesex, and Tolland Counties, CT, as the area of application and the 
New London wage area to include New London County, CT, as the survey 
area and Windham County, CT, as the area of application.

DATES: Effective Date: This regulation is effective on June 30, 2009.
    Applicability date for the New Haven-Hartford, CT, wage area: This 
rule applies for the full-scale wage survey scheduled to begin in April 
2011.
    Applicability date for the New London, CT, wage area: This rule 
applies for the full-scale wage survey scheduled to begin in September 
2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606-2838; e-
mail pay-performance-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 24, 2009, the U.S. Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) issued a proposed rule (74 FR 12280) to make 
the following three changes:
    (1) Define the New Haven-Hartford and New London, CT, appropriated 
fund Federal Wage System wage areas by county rather than by city and 
town boundaries;
    (2) Define the New Haven-Hartford wage area to include Hartford and 
New Haven Counties, CT, as the survey area and Fairfield, Litchfield, 
Middlesex, and Tolland Counties, CT, as the area of application; and
    (3) Define the New London wage area to include New London County, 
CT, as the survey area and Windham County, CT, as the area of 
application.

These changes are based on consensus recommendations of the Federal 
Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee. The proposed rule had a 30-day 
comment period, during which OPM received no comments.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    I certify that these regulations will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they 
will affect only Federal agencies and employees.

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of Information, 
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.

John Berry,
Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

0
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management amends 5 CFR part 
532 as follows:

PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS

0
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec.  532.707 also issued under 
5 U.S.C. 552.

0
2. In appendix C to subpart B, the wage area listing for the State of 
Connecticut is amended by revising the listings for New Haven-Hartford 
and New London; for the State of Massachusetts, by revising the listing 
for Central and Western Massachusetts; and for the State of Rhode 
Island, by revising the listing for Narragansett Bay, to read as 
follows:

Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532--Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey 
Areas

* * * * *

                               Connecticut
 
                           New Haven-Hartford
 
                               Survey Area
 
Connecticut:
  Hartford
  New Haven
 
                 Area of Application. Survey area plus:
 
Connecticut:
  Fairfield
  Litchfield
  Middlesex
  Tolland
                               New London
 
                               Survey Area
Connecticut:
  New London
 
                 Area of Application. Survey area plus:
 
Connecticut:
  Windham
 
                                * * * * *
                  Massachusetts
 
                                * * * * *
                    Central and Western Massachusetts
 
                               Survey Area
Massachusetts:
 
The following cities and towns in:
 
  Hampden County:
    Agawam
    Chicopee
    East Longmeadow
    Feeding Hills
    Hampden
    Holyoke
    Longmeadow
    Ludlow
    Monson
    Palmer
    Southwick
    Springfield
    Three Rivers
    Westfield
    West Springfield
    Wilbraham
 
  Hampshire County:
    Easthampton
    Granby
    Hadley
    Northampton
    South Hadley
 
  Worcester County:
    Warren
    West Warren
 
                 Area of Application. Survey area plus:
 
Massachusetts:
  Berkshire
  Franklin

[[Page 31154]]

 
  Worcester (except Blackstone and Millville)
 
The following cities and towns in:
 
  Hampshire County:
    Amherst
    Belchertown
    Chesterfield
    Cummington
    Goshen
    Hatfield
    Huntington
    Middlefield
    Pelham
    Plainfield
    Southampton
    Ware
    Westhampton
    Williamsburg
    Worthington
 
  Hampden County:
    Blandford
    Brimfield
    Chester
    Granville
    Holland
    Montgomery
    Russell
    Tolland
    Wales
 
  Middlesex County:
    Ashby
    Shirley
    Townsend
 
New Hampshire:
  Belknap
  Carroll
  Cheshire
  Grafton
  Hillsborough
  Merrimack
  Sullivan
 
Vermont:
  Addison
  Bennington
  Caledonia
  Essex
  Lamoille
  Orange
  Orleans
  Rutland
  Washington
  Windham
  Windsor
 
                                * * * * *
                              Rhode Island
 
                            Narragansett Bay
 
                               Survey Area
Rhode Island:
  Bristol
  Newport
 
The following cities and towns:
 
  Kent County:
    Anthony
    Coventry
    East Greenwich
    Greene
    Warwick
    West Warwick
 
  Providence County:
    Ashton
    Burrillville
    Central Falls
    Cranston
    Cumberland
    Cumberland Hill
    East Providence
    Esmond
    Forestdale
    Greenville
    Harrisville
    Johnston
    Lincoln
    Manville
    Mapleville
    North Providence
    North Smithfield
    Oakland
    Pascoag
    Pawtucket
    Providence
    Saylesville
    Slatersville
    Smithfield
    Valley Falls
    Wallum Lake
    Woonsocket
 
  Washington County:
    Davisville
    Galilee
    Lafayette
    Narragansett
    North Kingstown
    Point Judith
    Quonset Point
    Saunderstown
    Slocum
 
Massachusetts:
 
The following cities and towns:
 
  Bristol County:
    Attleboro
    Fall River
    North Attleboro
    Rehoboth
    Seekonk
    Somerset
    Swansea
    Westport
 
  Norfolk County:
    Caryville
    Plainville
    South Bellingham
 
  Worcester County:
    Blackstone
    Millville
 
                 Area of Application. Survey area plus:
 
Rhode Island:
 
The following cities and towns in:
 
  Kent County:
    West Greenwich
 
  Providence County:
    Foster
    Glocester
    Scituate
 
  Washington County:
    Charlestown
    Exeter
    Hopkinton
    New Shoreham
    Richmond
    South Kingstown
    Westerly
 
Massachusetts:
 
The following cities and towns in:
 
  Bristol County:
    Acushnet
    Berkley
    Dartmouth
    Dighton
    Fairhaven
    Freetown
    Mansfield
    New Bedford
    Norton
    Raynham
    Taunton
 

* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-15474 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.