National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) Mission, 31071-31073 [E9-15203]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 123 / Monday, June 29, 2009 / Notices
Projects
Obligated
Objective
Cumulative
disbursements
31071
Measures
Country: Namibia (CIF ONLY)
Year: 2009
Quarter 2
Total Obligation: $19,543,175
Entity to which the assistance is provided: MCA Namibia
Total Quarterly Disbursement: $0
Education Project ..............
$8,976,296
Tourism Project .................
2,475,145
Agriculture Project .............
Program Administration*
and Control, Monitoring
and Evaluation.
Pending Subsequent
Report**.
Improve the education
sector’s effectiveness,
efficiency and quality.
$0
TBD
Increase incomes and
create employment opportunities by improving
the marketing, management and infrastructure
of Etosha National Park.
0
TBD
1,369,139
Sustainably improve the
economic performance
and profitability of the
livestock sector and increase the volume of
the indigenous natural
products for export.
0
TBD
6,722,595
..........................................
0
........................
..........................................
0
MCC has concluded a Compact with Namibia providing up to $304,477,816 in development assistance which includes the CIF funding. At such
time the Compact enters into force, the balance of the funds will be obligated and become available to Namibia.
*Program administration funds are used to pay items such as salaries, rent, and the cost of office equipment.
**These amounts represent disbursements made that will be allocated to individual projects in the subsequent quarter(s) and reported as such
in subsequent quarterly report(s).
[FR Doc. E9–15308 Filed 6–26–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9211–03–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: (09–059)]
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA): Nuclear Spectroscopic
Telescope Array (NuSTAR) Mission
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI).
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 43321 et
seq.), the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for Implementing
the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), and NASA
policy and procedures (14 CFR part
1216 subpart 1216.3), NASA has made
a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) with respect to the proposed
NuSTAR mission. The proposed action
would be the launch of the NuSTAR
mission on a Pegasus XL launch vehicle
from the Reagan Test Site (RTS) at U.S.
Army Kwajalein Atoll (USAKA), the
Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:04 Jun 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
in August 2011. The only other
alternative that was considered in detail
was No Action.
DATES: Written comments on this FONSI
should be submitted to Mark Sistilli at
the address provided below and must be
postmarked no later than 30 days from
publication of this FONSI. While hard
copy comments are preferred, NASA
will accept e-mail addressed to Mark
Sistilli at the address provided below so
long as the e-mail is sent no later than
30 days from publication of this FONSI.
ADDRESSES: The environmental
documentation that supports and serves
as a basis for this FONSI may be
reviewed at the locations listed under
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION in this
notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Mark Sistilli, NASA Headquarters,
Science Mission Directorate,
Astrophysics Division, NASA
Headquarters, 300 E St., SW., Mail Suite
3Y33, Washington, DC 20546–0001,
Phone: 202–358–2242, E-mail:
mark.j.sistilli@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed NuSTAR spacecraft has been
reviewed in accordance with the
Routine Payload criteria established by
the ‘‘Final Environmental Assessment
for Launch of NASA Routine Payloads
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on Expendable Launch Vehicles from
Cape Canaveral Air Force Station
Florida and Vandenberg Air Force Base
California,’’ (NRP EA) dated June 2002
and FONSI dated June 18, 2002. This
review shows that the NuSTAR
spacecraft meets all of the Routine
Payload Criteria, with the exception of
criteria 3 which specifies the launch
vehicle and launch site conditions. The
baseline launch vehicle for NuSTAR is
the Pegasus XL, which is also covered
under the Routine Payload criteria.
However, the launch site proposed is
USAKA, in the RMI. Council of
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations encourages adoption of
existing documents where applicable (‘‘
* * * an agency may adopt appropriate
environmental documents prepared by
another agency (Sec. 1506.3)’’). In
addition, NASA Procedural
Requirements (NPR) 8580.1, section
K.2.17 encourages the adoption of other
agency existing NEPA documents. The
environmental impacts of the launch of
spacecraft from USAKA have been
reported in previous NEPA
documentation, therefore these NEPA
documents are hereby incorporated by
reference in this FONSI. This FONSI
formally adopts existing FAA and DOD
environmental documentation for
Pegasus launches from USAKA.
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
31072
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 123 / Monday, June 29, 2009 / Notices
At a minimum, NASA will take no
final action prior to 30 days following
the publication of this FONSI. Public
comments on the environmental aspects
of the proposed NuSTAR mission are
hereby solicited and will be considered
before NASA makes its final decision.
The NuSTAR mission was proposed
and selected in response to NASA’s
Announcement of Opportunity for the
Explorer Program in 2003. The Explorer
program provides frequent, low-cost
access to space missions for small-to
mid-sized spacecraft. The Explorer
program enables the definition,
development and implementation of
mission concepts through a variety of
modes to meet the need of the scientific
community and the NASA space
science enterprise. NuSTAR’s scientific
goals include helping scientists answer
fundamental questions about the
universe, such as:
1. How black holes are distributed
throughout the cosmos?
2. How the elements of the universe
were created?
3. What powers the most extreme
active galaxies?
With answers to these and other
questions, NuSTAR would expand
NASA’s understanding of the origins
and destinies of stars and galaxies.
NuSTAR would study the sky through
the use of high energy x-rays. It consists
of a single spacecraft which would be
placed into an equatorial orbit around
the Earth. The objective of the NuSTAR
mission is to conduct a census for black
holes on all scales, achieved through
deep, wide-field surveys of extragalactic
fields and the Galactic center, map
radioactive material in young supernova
remnants in order to study the birth of
the elements and to understand how
stars explode, to expose relativistic jets
of particles from the most extreme
active galaxies in order to understand
what powers giant cosmic accelerators,
to study cosmic ray origins and the
extreme physics around collapsed stars
and would respond to targets of
opportunity including supernovae and
gamma-ray bursts.
NuSTAR would achieve its science
objectives with a combination of
surveys and pointed observations. It
would consist of a single instrument
containing two identical grazing
incidence hard X-ray telescopes that
would effectively enlarge the X-ray
collecting area. The grazing incidence
mirrors would focus onto two shielded
solid-state pixel detectors, separated by
a mast that would extend the focal
length to ten meters (33 feet) after
launch. A laser metrology system (class
3B) would monitor the mast alignment
and remove mast flexure that would
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:07 Jun 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
ease mast stability requirements. The
optics would extend the frequency
range and field of view over that
achievable with standard metal surfaces.
Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CdZnTe)
detectors would provide excellent
spectral resolution and high quantum
efficiency without requiring cryogenic
operation. There would be a single
mechanical interface to the 3-axis
stabilized spacecraft bus provided by
Orbital Sciences Corporation, who also
manufactures the Pegasus launch
vehicle. NuSTAR would launch from
United States Army Kwajalein Atoll,
Republic of the Marshall Islands, aboard
a single Pegasus XL launch vehicle in
August 2011.
NuSTAR Adoption of Existing
Environmental Documentation
Applicability
The Pegasus XL launch vehicle would
be processed and the NuSTAR
spacecraft would be integrated to the
launch vehicle at Vandenberg Air Force
Base (VAFB), California. The Pegasus
would be attached to its dedicated L–
1011 aircraft at VAFB, and then ferried
to RTS for launch. Limited testing
operations on the spacecraft would be
conducted at RTS. On the day of launch,
the L–1011/Pegasus would depart from
RTS and then the Pegasus would be
released from the L–1011 aircraft at an
altitude of approximately 35,000 to
45,000 feet over the Pacific Ocean, at a
point southwest of the Kwajalein Atoll.
RTS is located on the USAKA, a
subordinate command of the U.S. Army
Space and Missile Defense Command,
located in the RMI, approximately 3,700
kilometers (2,000 nautical miles)
southwest of Hawaii. USAKA consists
of all or portions of 11 of the 100 islands
that enclose a 2,850 square kilometer
(1,100 square mile) lagoon, the largest
lagoon in the world. Kwajalein is one of
11 islands in the Marshall Islands leased
by the U.S. government.
The U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) has analyzed the
potential impacts of Pegasus launches at
RTS in previous documents (FAA, 1994,
OSC, 1999, and FAA, 2004) and has
determined that the activities associated
with the Pegasus operations at RTS will
not individually or cumulatively
significantly impact the quality of the
human or natural environment.
NASA has analyzed the potential
impacts of missions with spacecraft that
are considered routine payloads in an
environmental assessment (NRP EA).
Spacecraft defined as routine payloads
utilize materials, quantities of materials,
launch vehicles and operation
characteristics that are consistent with
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
normal and routine spacecraft
preparation and flight activities. The
environmental impacts of launching
routine payloads fall within the range of
routine, ongoing and previously
documented impacts that have been
determined not to be significant.
Spacecraft covered by the NRP EA meet
specific criteria ensuring that the
spacecraft and its operation and
decommissioning do not present any
new or substantial environmental or
safety concerns. The NuSTAR mission
meets the criteria for a NASA routine
payload (NASA, 2009) with the
exception of criteria 3 concerning
launch site conditions that are covered
in DOT environmental documentation
(FAA, 1994, OSC, 1999, and FAA,
2004). The mission does not present any
unique or unusual circumstances that
could result in new or substantial
environmental impacts.
Based on the analyses set forth in the
NRP EA and previous FAA documents,
NASA has determined that the
environmental impacts associated with
the NuSTAR mission will not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant impact on the quality of the
human environment. Therefore, an
Environmental Impact Statement is not
required. In making this determination,
NASA not only considered that the
NuSTAR mission satisfies the criteria
set forth in the NRP EA for spacecraft
impacts, but it considered the potential
site specific impacts of the NuSTAR
mission set forth and detailed in the
DOT documentation identified above.
The environmental documentation
that supports and serves as a basis for
this FONSI may be reviewed at the
following locations:
Alele Public Library, P.O. Box 629,
Majuro, Republic of the Marshall
Islands 96960.
Grace Sherwood and Roi-Namur
Libraries, P.O. Box 23, Kwajalein,
Marshall Islands APO, A.P. 96555.
The environmental documentation
may also be examined at the following
locations by contacting the pertinent
Freedom of Information Act Office:
(a) NASA, John F. Kennedy Space
Center, FL 32899 (321–867–2745);
(b) NASA, Ames Research Center,
Moffett Field, CA 94035 (650–604–
3273);
(c) NASA, Dryden Flight Research
Center, Edwards, CA 93523 (661–276–
2704);
(d) NASA, Glenn Research Center at
Lewis Field, Cleveland, OH 44135 (1–
866–404–3642);
(e) NASA, Goddard Space Flight
Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 (301–286–
4721);
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 123 / Monday, June 29, 2009 / Notices
(f) NASA, John C. Stennis Space
Center, MS 39529 (228–688–2118);
(g) NASA, Lyndon B. Johnson Space
Center, Houston, TX 77058 (281–483–
8612);
(h) NASA, Langley Research Center,
Hampton, VA 23681 (757–864–2497);
(i) NASA, Michoud Assembly
Facility, New Orleans, LA 70189 (504–
257–2629); and
(j) NASA, White Sands Test Facility,
Las Cruces, NM 88004 (505–524–5024);
(k) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Visitors
Lobby, Building 249, 4800 Oak Grove
Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109.
Limited hard copies of the specific
environmental documentation named
below that supports this FONSI are
available on a first-request basis by
contacting Mark Sistilli at the address,
telephone number, and e-mail address
indicated wherein.
References
A complete list of all references cited
in this rule is available on the Internet
at https://oim.hq.nasa.gov/oia/emd/
ep.html or by e-mailing a request to
nepa@hq.nasa.gov.
Edward J. Weiler,
Associate Administrator for Science Mission
Directorate.
[FR Doc. E9–15203 Filed 6–26–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0262]
Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance,
Availability
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Issuance and
Availability of Draft Regulatory Guide,
DG–3037.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margie Kotzalas, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone: (301) 492–
3202, e-mail Margie.Kotzalas@nrc.gov,
or, R.A. Jervey, telephone (301) 251–
7404, e-mail Richard.Jervey@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing for public
comment a draft guide in the agency’s
‘‘Regulatory Guide’’ series. This series
was developed to describe and make
available to the public information and
methods that are acceptable to the NRC
staff for implementing specific parts of
the NRC’s regulations, techniques that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:04 Jun 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
the staff uses in evaluating specific
problems or postulated accidents, and
data that the staff needs in its review of
applications.
The draft regulatory guide (DG),
entitled, ‘‘Guidance for Fuel Cycle
Facility Change Processes,’’ is
temporarily identified by its task
number, DG–3037, which should be
mentioned in all related
correspondence. DG–3037 will be a new
regulatory guide.
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 70, ‘‘Domestic
Licensing of Special Nuclear Material’’
(10 CFR Part 70) contains the
regulations for fuel cycle facility
licensees that possess greater than a
critical mass of special nuclear material
and are engaged in enriched uranium
processing, fabrication of uranium fuel
or fuel assemblies, uranium enrichment,
enriched uranium hexafluoride
conversion, plutonium processing, and
fabrication of mixed-oxide fuel or fuel
assemblies.
Subsection (a) of 10 CFR 70.72,
‘‘Facility changes and change process,’’
requires that fuel cycle facility licensees
establish a configuration management
system to evaluate, implement, and
track each change to the site, structures,
processes, systems, equipment,
components, computer programs, and
activities of personnel. Such changes
may be made by the licensee without
prior approval of the NRC, provided that
the changes meet the criteria of 10 CFR
70.72(c). DG–3037 provides guidance on
how to meet the requirements of 10 CFR
70.72(c).
II. Further Information
The NRC staff is soliciting comments
on DG–3037. Comments may be
accompanied by relevant information or
supporting data and should reference
DG–3037 in the subject line. Comments
submitted in writing or in electronic
form will be made available to the
public in their entirety through the
NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access
and Management System (ADAMS).
Personal information will not be
removed from your comments. You may
submit comments by any of the
following methods:
1. Mail comments to: Rulemaking and
Directives Branch, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
2. E-mail comments to:
nrcrep.resource@nrc.gov.
Requests for technical information
about DG–3037 may be directed to the
NRC contact, Margie Kotzalas at (301)
492–3202 or e-mail to
Margie.Kotzalas@nrc.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31073
Comments would be most helpful if
received by August 17, 2009. Comments
received after that date will be
considered if it is practical to do so, but
the NRC is able to ensure consideration
only for comments received on or before
this date. Although a time limit is given,
comments and suggestions in
connection with items for inclusion in
guides currently being developed or
improvements in all published guides
are encouraged at any time.
Electronic copies of DG–3037 are
available through the NRC’s public Web
site under Draft Regulatory Guides in
the ‘‘Regulatory Guides’’ collection of
the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/. Electronic copies are also
available in ADAMS (https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html),
under Accession No. ML091200493.
In addition, regulatory guides are
available for inspection at the NRC’s
Public Document Room (PDR), which is
located at 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland. The PDR’s mailing
address is USNRC PDR, Washington, DC
20555–0001. The PDR can also be
reached by telephone at (301) 415–4737
or (800) 397–4205, by fax at (301) 415–
3548, and by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Regulatory guides are not
copyrighted, and Commission approval
is not required to reproduce them.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd
day of June, 2009. For the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
M.P. Orr,
Acting Chief, Regulatory Guide Development
Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of
Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. E9–15279 Filed 6–26–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
28769; File No. 812–13633]
Embarcadero Funds, Inc., et al.; Notice
of Application
June 22, 2009.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of an application under
section 6(c) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘1940 Act’’) for
an exemption from section 15(a) of the
Act and rule 18f–2 under the Act, as
well as from certain disclosure
requirements.
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
request an order that would permit them
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31071-31073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15203]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: (09-059)]
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): Nuclear Spectroscopic
Telescope Array (NuSTAR) Mission
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 43321 et seq.), the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural
Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and NASA policy and
procedures (14 CFR part 1216 subpart 1216.3), NASA has made a Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI) with respect to the proposed NuSTAR
mission. The proposed action would be the launch of the NuSTAR mission
on a Pegasus XL launch vehicle from the Reagan Test Site (RTS) at U.S.
Army Kwajalein Atoll (USAKA), the Republic of the Marshall Islands
(RMI) in August 2011. The only other alternative that was considered in
detail was No Action.
DATES: Written comments on this FONSI should be submitted to Mark
Sistilli at the address provided below and must be postmarked no later
than 30 days from publication of this FONSI. While hard copy comments
are preferred, NASA will accept e-mail addressed to Mark Sistilli at
the address provided below so long as the e-mail is sent no later than
30 days from publication of this FONSI.
ADDRESSES: The environmental documentation that supports and serves as
a basis for this FONSI may be reviewed at the locations listed under
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION in this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Sistilli, NASA Headquarters,
Science Mission Directorate, Astrophysics Division, NASA Headquarters,
300 E St., SW., Mail Suite 3Y33, Washington, DC 20546-0001, Phone: 202-
358-2242, E-mail: mark.j.sistilli@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed NuSTAR spacecraft has been
reviewed in accordance with the Routine Payload criteria established by
the ``Final Environmental Assessment for Launch of NASA Routine
Payloads on Expendable Launch Vehicles from Cape Canaveral Air Force
Station Florida and Vandenberg Air Force Base California,'' (NRP EA)
dated June 2002 and FONSI dated June 18, 2002. This review shows that
the NuSTAR spacecraft meets all of the Routine Payload Criteria, with
the exception of criteria 3 which specifies the launch vehicle and
launch site conditions. The baseline launch vehicle for NuSTAR is the
Pegasus XL, which is also covered under the Routine Payload criteria.
However, the launch site proposed is USAKA, in the RMI. Council of
Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations encourages adoption of existing
documents where applicable (`` * * * an agency may adopt appropriate
environmental documents prepared by another agency (Sec. 1506.3)''). In
addition, NASA Procedural Requirements (NPR) 8580.1, section K.2.17
encourages the adoption of other agency existing NEPA documents. The
environmental impacts of the launch of spacecraft from USAKA have been
reported in previous NEPA documentation, therefore these NEPA documents
are hereby incorporated by reference in this FONSI. This FONSI formally
adopts existing FAA and DOD environmental documentation for Pegasus
launches from USAKA.
[[Page 31072]]
At a minimum, NASA will take no final action prior to 30 days
following the publication of this FONSI. Public comments on the
environmental aspects of the proposed NuSTAR mission are hereby
solicited and will be considered before NASA makes its final decision.
The NuSTAR mission was proposed and selected in response to NASA's
Announcement of Opportunity for the Explorer Program in 2003. The
Explorer program provides frequent, low-cost access to space missions
for small-to mid-sized spacecraft. The Explorer program enables the
definition, development and implementation of mission concepts through
a variety of modes to meet the need of the scientific community and the
NASA space science enterprise. NuSTAR's scientific goals include
helping scientists answer fundamental questions about the universe,
such as:
1. How black holes are distributed throughout the cosmos?
2. How the elements of the universe were created?
3. What powers the most extreme active galaxies?
With answers to these and other questions, NuSTAR would expand
NASA's understanding of the origins and destinies of stars and
galaxies.
NuSTAR would study the sky through the use of high energy x-rays.
It consists of a single spacecraft which would be placed into an
equatorial orbit around the Earth. The objective of the NuSTAR mission
is to conduct a census for black holes on all scales, achieved through
deep, wide-field surveys of extragalactic fields and the Galactic
center, map radioactive material in young supernova remnants in order
to study the birth of the elements and to understand how stars explode,
to expose relativistic jets of particles from the most extreme active
galaxies in order to understand what powers giant cosmic accelerators,
to study cosmic ray origins and the extreme physics around collapsed
stars and would respond to targets of opportunity including supernovae
and gamma-ray bursts.
NuSTAR would achieve its science objectives with a combination of
surveys and pointed observations. It would consist of a single
instrument containing two identical grazing incidence hard X-ray
telescopes that would effectively enlarge the X-ray collecting area.
The grazing incidence mirrors would focus onto two shielded solid-state
pixel detectors, separated by a mast that would extend the focal length
to ten meters (33 feet) after launch. A laser metrology system (class
3B) would monitor the mast alignment and remove mast flexure that would
ease mast stability requirements. The optics would extend the frequency
range and field of view over that achievable with standard metal
surfaces. Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CdZnTe) detectors would provide
excellent spectral resolution and high quantum efficiency without
requiring cryogenic operation. There would be a single mechanical
interface to the 3-axis stabilized spacecraft bus provided by Orbital
Sciences Corporation, who also manufactures the Pegasus launch vehicle.
NuSTAR would launch from United States Army Kwajalein Atoll, Republic
of the Marshall Islands, aboard a single Pegasus XL launch vehicle in
August 2011.
NuSTAR Adoption of Existing Environmental Documentation Applicability
The Pegasus XL launch vehicle would be processed and the NuSTAR
spacecraft would be integrated to the launch vehicle at Vandenberg Air
Force Base (VAFB), California. The Pegasus would be attached to its
dedicated L-1011 aircraft at VAFB, and then ferried to RTS for launch.
Limited testing operations on the spacecraft would be conducted at RTS.
On the day of launch, the L-1011/Pegasus would depart from RTS and then
the Pegasus would be released from the L-1011 aircraft at an altitude
of approximately 35,000 to 45,000 feet over the Pacific Ocean, at a
point southwest of the Kwajalein Atoll.
RTS is located on the USAKA, a subordinate command of the U.S. Army
Space and Missile Defense Command, located in the RMI, approximately
3,700 kilometers (2,000 nautical miles) southwest of Hawaii. USAKA
consists of all or portions of 11 of the 100 islands that enclose a
2,850 square kilometer (1,100 square mile) lagoon, the largest lagoon
in the world. Kwajalein is one of 11 islands in the Marshall Islands
leased by the U.S. government.
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) has analyzed the potential impacts of Pegasus
launches at RTS in previous documents (FAA, 1994, OSC, 1999, and FAA,
2004) and has determined that the activities associated with the
Pegasus operations at RTS will not individually or cumulatively
significantly impact the quality of the human or natural environment.
NASA has analyzed the potential impacts of missions with spacecraft
that are considered routine payloads in an environmental assessment
(NRP EA). Spacecraft defined as routine payloads utilize materials,
quantities of materials, launch vehicles and operation characteristics
that are consistent with normal and routine spacecraft preparation and
flight activities. The environmental impacts of launching routine
payloads fall within the range of routine, ongoing and previously
documented impacts that have been determined not to be significant.
Spacecraft covered by the NRP EA meet specific criteria ensuring that
the spacecraft and its operation and decommissioning do not present any
new or substantial environmental or safety concerns. The NuSTAR mission
meets the criteria for a NASA routine payload (NASA, 2009) with the
exception of criteria 3 concerning launch site conditions that are
covered in DOT environmental documentation (FAA, 1994, OSC, 1999, and
FAA, 2004). The mission does not present any unique or unusual
circumstances that could result in new or substantial environmental
impacts.
Based on the analyses set forth in the NRP EA and previous FAA
documents, NASA has determined that the environmental impacts
associated with the NuSTAR mission will not individually or
cumulatively have a significant impact on the quality of the human
environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not
required. In making this determination, NASA not only considered that
the NuSTAR mission satisfies the criteria set forth in the NRP EA for
spacecraft impacts, but it considered the potential site specific
impacts of the NuSTAR mission set forth and detailed in the DOT
documentation identified above.
The environmental documentation that supports and serves as a basis
for this FONSI may be reviewed at the following locations:
Alele Public Library, P.O. Box 629, Majuro, Republic of the Marshall
Islands 96960.
Grace Sherwood and Roi-Namur Libraries, P.O. Box 23, Kwajalein,
Marshall Islands APO, A.P. 96555.
The environmental documentation may also be examined at the
following locations by contacting the pertinent Freedom of Information
Act Office:
(a) NASA, John F. Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899 (321-867-2745);
(b) NASA, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 (650-604-
3273);
(c) NASA, Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, CA 93523 (661-
276-2704);
(d) NASA, Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, Cleveland, OH 44135
(1-866-404-3642);
(e) NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 (301-
286-4721);
[[Page 31073]]
(f) NASA, John C. Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 (228-688-2118);
(g) NASA, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058 (281-
483-8612);
(h) NASA, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681 (757-864-
2497);
(i) NASA, Michoud Assembly Facility, New Orleans, LA 70189 (504-
257-2629); and
(j) NASA, White Sands Test Facility, Las Cruces, NM 88004 (505-524-
5024);
(k) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Visitors Lobby, Building 249, 4800
Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109.
Limited hard copies of the specific environmental documentation
named below that supports this FONSI are available on a first-request
basis by contacting Mark Sistilli at the address, telephone number, and
e-mail address indicated wherein.
References
A complete list of all references cited in this rule is available
on the Internet at https://oim.hq.nasa.gov/oia/emd/ep.html or by e-
mailing a request to nepa@hq.nasa.gov.
Edward J. Weiler,
Associate Administrator for Science Mission Directorate.
[FR Doc. E9-15203 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P