Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, California Air Resources Board Consumer Products Regulations, 30481-30485 [E9-15144]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
30481
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 122
Friday, June 26, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2007–1131; FRL–8921–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois;
Oxides of Nitrogen Regulations, Phase
II
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
EPA is proposing to approve
a request submitted by the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
(Illinois EPA) on October 23, 2007, to
revise the Illinois State Implementation
Plan (SIP). The rules submitted by
Illinois EPA satisfy the requirements of
EPA’s NOX SIP Call Phase II Rule (the
Phase II Rule). We are proposing to
approve these regulations based on
Illinois’ demonstration that the State
will meet the emissions targets set forth
in the Phase II Rule through reductions
from stationary internal combustion (IC)
engines and turbines which are
identified in the NOX plan submittal.
Limiting NOX emissions from IC engines
and turbines will enable the State to
meet the 7,055 ton reduction
requirement contained in the Phase II
Rule, thereby improving air quality and
protecting the health of Illinois citizens.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2007–1131, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2551.
4. Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief,
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney,
Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:15 Jun 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which is
located in the Final Rules section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andy Chang, Environmental Engineer,
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 886–0258,
chang.andy@epa.gov.
In the
Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If we do not receive any adverse
comments in response to this rule, we
do not contemplate taking any further
action. If EPA receives adverse
comments, we will withdraw the direct
final rule, and will address all public
comments in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. For additional information,
see the direct final rule, which is
located in the Final Rules section of this
Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: June 11, 2009.
Walter W. Kovalick Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E9–14857 Filed 6–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0353; FRL–8923–4]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, California Air
Resources Board Consumer Products
Regulations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the California Air Resources
Board’s Consumer Products portion of
the California State Implementation
Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
volatile organic compound (VOC)
emissions from consumer products. We
are approving State rules that regulate
these emission sources under the Clean
Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act). We are taking comments on this
proposal and plan to follow with a final
action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
July 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2009–0353, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
30482
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 122 / Friday, June 26, 2009 / Proposed Rules
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
https://www.regulations.gov is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the public
comment. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What regulations did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these
regulations?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
regulation revisions?
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating these
regulations?
B. Do the regulations meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. EPA recommendations to further
improve the regulations.
D. Public comment and final action.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What regulations did the State
submit?
Table 1 lists the regulations addressed
by this proposal with the dates that they
were adopted by the State and
submitted by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED REGULATIONS
Adopted/
amended
Regulation
Regulation Title
California Code of Regulations Title 17, Division 3,
Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5—Consumer Products.
California Code of Regulations Title 17, Division 3,
Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5—Consumer Products.
California Code of Regulations Title 17, Division 3,
Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5—Consumer Products.
California Air Resources Board—Test Method 310 .....
Article 1—Antiperspirants and Deodorants ..................
05/06/2005
03/27/2008
Article 2—Consumer Products .....................................
09/26/2007
03/27/2008
Article 3—Aerosol Coating Products ............................
09/26/2007
03/27/2008
Method 310—Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in Consumer Products and Reactive
Organic Compounds in Aerosol Coating Products.
05/06/2005
03/27/2008
These submittals became complete by
operation of law on September 27, 2008.
B. Are there other versions of these
regulations?
We approved a version of CARB’s
Antiperspirant and Deodorant
Regulation into the SIP on August 21,
1995 (60 FR 43379). CARB adopted and
Submitted
submitted revisions to the SIP-approved
version on the following dates. While
we are acting on only the most recently
submitted version, we have reviewed
materials provided with previous
submittals.
Antiperspirant and deodorant hearing date
Amended
Submitted to EPA
September 28, 1995 ..........................................
January 26, 1996 ...............................................
August 27, 1996.
November 21, 1996 ...........................................
September 25, 1997 ..........................................
December 18, 1998.
November 21, 1996 ...........................................
October 3, 1997.
November 19, 1998 ...........................................
November 19, 1999 ...........................................
Not submitted—methyl acetate
exempted.
October 26, 2000 ...............................................
October 26, 2000 ...............................................
April 3, 2002.
We approved a version of CARB’s
Consumer Products Regulation into the
SIP on August 21, 1995 (60 FR 43379).
CARB adopted and submitted revisions
to the SIP-approved version on the
following dates. While we are acting on
only the most recently submitted
version, we have reviewed materials
provided with previous submittals.
Consumer products hearing date
Amended
September 28, 1995 ..........................................
January 16, 1996 ...............................................
August 27, 1996.
November 21, 1996 ...........................................
September 25, 1997 ..........................................
December 18, 1998.
November 21, 1996 ...........................................
October 3, 1997.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:56 Jun 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Submitted to EPA
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 122 / Friday, June 26, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Consumer products hearing date
Amended
30483
Submitted to EPA
March 27, 1997 ..................................................
March 27, 1997.
July 24, 1997 .....................................................
May 20, 1998.
November 19, 1998 ...........................................
November 19, 1999 ...........................................
Not submitted—methyl acetate exempted.
October 28, 1999 ...............................................
August 14, 2000 ................................................
April 3, 2002.
May 25, 2000 .....................................................
February 12, 2001.
June 24, 2004 ....................................................
May 6, 2005 .......................................................
We approved the following version of
CARB’s Aerosol Coating Products
Regulation into the SIP on September
13, 2005 (70 FR 53930).
1. Antiperspirants and Deodorants
Aerosol coating products
hearing date
May 1, 2001 ..
Amended
June 22,
2000.
Submitted to
EPA
March 13,
2002.
EPA has not approved any prior
version of CARB Test Method 310 into
the SIP.
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
regulation revisions?
VOCs help produce ground-level
ozone and smog, which harm human
health and the environment. Section
110(a) of the CAA requires States to
submit regulations that control VOC
emissions.
The California Health and Safety Code
(Section 41712(b)) requires CARB to
‘‘adopt regulations to achieve the
maximum feasible reduction in volatile
organic compounds emitted by
consumer products, if the state board
determines that adequate data exists to
establish both of the following:
(1) The regulations are necessary to
attain state and federal ambient air
quality standards.
(2) The regulations are commercially
and technologically feasible and
necessary.’’
CARB’s consumer products
regulations are found under the
California Code of Regulations Title 17
Chapter 1 Subchapter 8.5 and include:
Article 1—Antiperspirants and
Deodorants
Article 2—Consumer Products
Article 3—Aerosol Coating Products
Article 4—Alternative Control Plan
Article 5—Hairspray Credit Program
The following are brief descriptions of
CARB’s consumer product regulations
and the amendments adopted by CARB,
which we propose to approve into the
SIP.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:56 Jun 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
CARB’s Antiperspirants and
Deodorants (APDO) regulation limits the
percent of high volatility organic
compounds (HVOC) and medium
volatility organic compounds (MVOC)
in products. The original SIP-approved
regulation contained two tiers of
HVOC/MVOC limits, which took effect
in 1992 and 1995. Amendments adopted
by CARB include updating the
definition of VOC to be more consistent
with EPA’s definition in 40 CFR
50.100(s), extending the 18-month sellthrough period to 3 years to incorporate
changes in State law, repealing a zero
percent limit for HVOC for aerosol
antiperspirants, and clarifying the
definition of ‘‘deodorant’’ to distinguish
products covered under the APDO
regulation from products covered under
CARB’s general consumer products
regulation.
CARB’s SIP-approved regulation
originally contained an aggressive limit
of zero percent HVOC for aerosol
antiperspirants. CARB later determined
that this limit was not technically
feasible, even with a compliance
extension, and repealed it in an October
26, 2000 hearing. CARB’s April 3, 2002
submittal letter to EPA estimated that
this would result in a shortfall in VOC
emissions reductions of approximately
1.3 tons per day (tpd) statewide in 2010.
CARB indicated, however, that their
Mid-term Measure II Consumer
Products regulation would achieve
approximately 21 tpd of VOC emissions
reductions, which more than offset the
shortfall. EPA is proposing to act on the
APDO and Consumer Products
submittals together.
CARB’s APDO regulation is more
stringent than EPA’s national Consumer
Products rule (40 CFR part 59, subpart
C) in the following ways:
(a) Contains more stringent two tier
HVOC/MVOC limits.
(b) Limits sell-through period to 3
years (EPA does not have a limit for the
sell-through period).
(c) Requires compliance by laboratory
testing or calculation.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
March 27, 2008.
(d) Prohibits use of toxic air
contaminants.
(e) Covers retailers.
2. Consumer Products
CARB’s Consumer Products
regulation limits the VOC content in
products such as air fresheners,
automotive products, bathroom
cleaners, hair care products, and
insecticides. CARB’s 2006 Initial
Statement of Reasons (ISOR) indicates
consumer products are a significant
source of VOC emissions in California
and accounted for approximately 260
tpd of VOC emissions in 2005. CARB’s
ISOR further indicates that as a result of
their consumer products regulations
over the last 15 years, statewide VOC
emissions from consumer products were
reduced by over 170 tpd (40 percent
reduction) in 2010. Appendix A of the
ISOR further points out that ‘‘emissions
from Consumer Products, in 2020, will
be the largest source of VOC emissions
in the South Coast Air Basin, and the
third largest source in the San Joaquin
Valley Air Basin.’’
Revisions to the SIP-approved
regulation adopted by CARB include
repealing the aerosol adhesives VOC
limit, postponing the second-tier VOC
limit for hairsprays and approximately
doubling the number of consumer
product categories for regulation.
CARB originally adopted the VOC
limit for aerosol adhesives in 1989 with
two tiers. The first tier established a
VOC limit of 75 percent, effective
January 1, 1995, and the second tier
established a VOC limit of 25 percent
effective January 1, 1997. CARB
indicates that the aerosol adhesives
category is small, approximately 0.4 tpd
and that most manufacturers were
‘‘having significant difficulty meeting
the 25 percent VOC standard.’’
Technical problems encountered
included freeze thaw stability and
solvents drying too slowly, too fast, or
dissolving into the substrate. In May
2000, CARB repealed the 25 percent
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
30484
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 122 / Friday, June 26, 2009 / Proposed Rules
VOC limit and adopted three new
aerosol adhesive categories. EPA’s VOC
content limit for household aerosol
adhesives remains at 75 percent. 40 CFR
part 59, subpart C, Table 1.
CARB also indicated it had to
postpone the second-tier VOC hairspray
limit of 55 percent for 17 months from
January 1998 until June 1999. Although
CARB concluded that the 55 percent
limit was technically feasible,
additional time was required by
manufacturers to complete product
development and testing. CARB
explained in its staff report that the
delayed implementation would not
compromise its SIP commitment
because air pollution control districts
had not claimed the reductions until the
beginning of the 1999 summer ozone
season.
Other amendments adopted by CARB
include clarifying definitions, requiring
notifications for products sold towards
the end of a sell-through period,
prohibiting solid air fresheners or toilet/
urinal care products from containing
para-dichlorobenzene (a toxic air
contaminant/hazardous air pollutant)
and clarifying that for products
manufactured after January 1, 2007, the
‘‘most restrictive limit’’ applies to any
representation made anywhere on the
label, packaging, and all affixed labels.
CARB states that it established the sellthrough period and most restrictive
limits because of a finding that older
non-compliant products remained on
shelves long after the three year sellthrough period and CARB enforcement
investigations finding representations
made on the principal display panel
that were inconsistent with
representations on the rest of the label
or packaging. CARB noted that ‘‘labels
have appeared to have been changed to
avoid reformulation to meet VOC
limits.’’ CARB ISOR May 7, 2004, page
V–52. CARB’s amendments also clarify
that codes indicating date of
manufacture are public information and
cannot be claimed as confidential.
CARB’s 1992 SIP-approved regulation
covered approximately 50 categories/
subcategories of consumer products.
Since that time, CARB has added
additional consumer product categories
for regulation and has further reduced
the VOC limits in existing categories.
The amended rule covers 112
categories/subcategories of consumer
products.
CARB’s Consumer Products
regulation is more stringent than EPA’s
national Consumer Products rule (40
CFR part 59, subpart C) in the following
ways:
(a) Contains more stringent two-tier
VOC limits.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:15 Jun 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
(b) Covers more categories of
consumer products.
(c) Limits the sell-through period to 3
years.
(d) Requires compliance by laboratory
testing or calculation.
(e) Prohibits use of toxic air
contaminants and ozone depleting
substances.
(f) Covers retailers.
3. Aerosol Coating Products
EPA approved CARB’s Aerosol
Coating Products regulation (adopted
May 1, 2001) into the SIP on September
13, 2005. CARB adopted minor updates
to test methods in the regulation at a
public hearing in 2004 and clarifications
to overlapping requirements between
the Aerosol Coating Products and
Consumer Products regulations at a
hearing on November 17, 2006. These
amendments covered Rubber and Vinyl
Protectants, Fabric Protectants, Vinyl/
Fabric/Leather/Polycarbonate Coatings,
cosmetic products, and other products
used on the human body. The purpose
of the 2006 amendments was to clarify
that each of these products would be
regulated under only one of these two
regulations. The amendment also
clarified that cosmetics and other
products used on the human body are
regulated only under the Consumer
Products regulation and exempted from
CARB’s Aerosol Coatings regulation.
4. Method 310
CARB Method 310 incorporates by
reference a number of other test
methods including those from US EPA,
the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM), and the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH). Method 310 also:
contains procedures to separate the
propellant from the non-propellant
portions of aerosol products; allows
analysis of the propellant and nonpropellant portions for total VOC,
exempt VOC or prohibited compounds
such as toxic air contaminants;
determines the low vapor pressure VOC
status of compounds and mixtures; and
identifies the reactive organic
compounds in aerosol coating products.
The 2005 amendments to Method 310
include updating references to many of
the ASTM and EPA test methods and
adding an equation to calculate the VOC
content of low vapor pressure
compounds and/or mixtures.
EPA’s technical support document
(TSD) has more information on CARB’s
consumer products regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the
regulations?
Generally, SIP rules must be
enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act), must require Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT) for each
category of sources covered by a Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document
as well as each major source in
nonattainment areas (see section
182(a)(2) and (b)(2)), and must not relax
existing requirements (see sections
110(l) and 193). California’s consumer
products regulations cover VOC area
sources and not stationary sources.
While there are no applicable CTGs for
these source categories, in 1998 EPA
promulgated national rules to regulate
VOC emissions from consumer products
(63 FR 48831, September 11, 1998) and
aerosol coating products (73 FR 15621,
March 24, 2008). EPA’s national rules
largely parallel CARB’s earlier SIPapproved rules. The amendments we are
proposing to approve today are more
stringent than EPA’s standards.
Rules, guidance and policy
documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability and RACT requirements
consistently include the following:
1. Portions of the proposed post-1987
ozone and carbon monoxide policy that
concern RACT, 52 FR 45044, November
24, 1987.
2. ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation
Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,’’ EPA, May 25, 1988 (the
Bluebook).
3. State Implementation Plans,
General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean
Air Act Amendments of 1990 (57 FR
13498; April 16, 1992).
4. ‘‘Guidance Document for Correcting
Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,’’ EPA Region 9, August 21,
2001 (the Little Bluebook).
5. 40 CFR Part 59 Subpart C, National
Volatile Organic Compound Emission
Standards for Consumer Products;
Subpart E, National VOC Emission
Standards for Aerosol Coatings.
B. Do the regulations meet the
evaluation criteria?
We believe CARB’s Consumer
Products regulations are consistent with
the relevant rules and policy and
guidance documents regarding
enforceability, RACT, and SIP
relaxations. CARB’s Antiperspirants and
Deodorants, Consumer Products, and
Aerosol Coating Products regulations
contain more stringent limits and cover
more than twice the number of
categories covered by EPA’s national
Consumer Products rule. CARB found,
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 122 / Friday, June 26, 2009 / Proposed Rules
however, that some technology-forcing
limits, such as the aerosol adhesives
limit originally adopted in 1989, were
not achievable. In those cases, CARB
identified limits that were achievable
and offset any shortfall in emission
reductions through greater reductions in
other consumer product categories. The
TSDs have more information on our
evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendations to Further
Improve the Regulations
The TSD for CARB Method 310
suggests an amendment to clarify an
equation’s legend. EPA recommends
that CARB adopt this clarifying
amendment the next time it modifies
Method 310.
D. Public Comment and Final Action
Because EPA believes the submitted
regulations fulfill all relevant
requirements, we are proposing to fully
approve them consistent with section
110(k)(3) of the Act. We are also
proposing to approve CARB Method 310
to support compliance with CARB’s
APDO, Consumer Products, and Aerosol
Coating Products regulations. We will
accept comments from the public on
this proposal for the next 30 days.
Unless we receive convincing new
information during the comment period,
we intend to publish a final approval
action that will incorporate these
regulations into the federally
enforceable SIP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:15 Jun 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 17, 2009.
Jane Diamond,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E9–15144 Filed 6–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30485
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0272; FRL–8923–3]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control
District and South Coast Air Quality
Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the San Joaquin Valley
Unified Air Pollution Control District
(SJVUAPCD) and South Coast Air
Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) portions of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern particulate matter
emissions from open burning; wood
burning fireplaces and heaters; and the
storage, handling, and transportation of
coke, coal, and sulfur. We are proposing
to approve local rules that regulate these
emissions under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We
are taking comments on this proposal
and plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
July 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2009–0272, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
• E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
• Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
https://www.regulations.gov is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send
e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the public
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30481-30485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15144]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0353; FRL-8923-4]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, California
Air Resources Board Consumer Products Regulations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the California Air
Resources Board's Consumer Products portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from consumer products. We are approving State
rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this
proposal and plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by July 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2009-0353, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected
[[Page 30482]]
should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted
through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. https://www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region
IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents
in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What regulations did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these regulations?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted regulation revisions?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating these regulations?
B. Do the regulations meet the evaluation criteria?
C. EPA recommendations to further improve the regulations.
D. Public comment and final action.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What regulations did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the regulations addressed by this proposal with the
dates that they were adopted by the State and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).
Table 1--Submitted Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adopted/
Regulation Regulation Title amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California Code of Regulations Title 17, Article 1--Antiperspirants and 05/06/2005 03/27/2008
Division 3, Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5-- Deodorants.
Consumer Products.
California Code of Regulations Title 17, Article 2--Consumer Products....... 09/26/2007 03/27/2008
Division 3, Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5--
Consumer Products.
California Code of Regulations Title 17, Article 3--Aerosol Coating Products 09/26/2007 03/27/2008
Division 3, Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5--
Consumer Products.
California Air Resources Board--Test Method Method 310--Determination of 05/06/2005 03/27/2008
310. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)
in Consumer Products and Reactive
Organic Compounds in Aerosol
Coating Products.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These submittals became complete by operation of law on September
27, 2008.
B. Are there other versions of these regulations?
We approved a version of CARB's Antiperspirant and Deodorant
Regulation into the SIP on August 21, 1995 (60 FR 43379). CARB adopted
and submitted revisions to the SIP-approved version on the following
dates. While we are acting on only the most recently submitted version,
we have reviewed materials provided with previous submittals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antiperspirant and deodorant
hearing date Amended Submitted to EPA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 28, 1995.............. January 26, 1996... August 27, 1996.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 21, 1996............... September 25, 1997. December 18, 1998.
------------------------------------------------------
November 21, 1996............... October 3, 1997....
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 19, 1998............... November 19, 1999.. Not submitted--methyl acetate
exempted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October 26, 2000................ October 26, 2000... April 3, 2002.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We approved a version of CARB's Consumer Products Regulation into
the SIP on August 21, 1995 (60 FR 43379). CARB adopted and submitted
revisions to the SIP-approved version on the following dates. While we
are acting on only the most recently submitted version, we have
reviewed materials provided with previous submittals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consumer products hearing date Amended Submitted to EPA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 28, 1995.............. January 16, 1996... August 27, 1996.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 21, 1996............... September 25, 1997. December 18, 1998.
------------------------------------------------------
November 21, 1996............... October 3, 1997....
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 30483]]
March 27, 1997.................. March 27, 1997.....
------------------------------------------------------
July 24, 1997................... May 20, 1998.......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 19, 1998............... November 19, 1999.. Not submitted--methyl acetate exempted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October 28, 1999................ August 14, 2000.... April 3, 2002.
------------------------------------------------------
May 25, 2000.................... February 12, 2001..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
June 24, 2004................... May 6, 2005........ March 27, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We approved the following version of CARB's Aerosol Coating
Products Regulation into the SIP on September 13, 2005 (70 FR 53930).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aerosol coating products
hearing date Amended Submitted to EPA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
May 1, 2001.................... June 22, 2000..... March 13, 2002.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has not approved any prior version of CARB Test Method 310 into
the SIP.
C. What is the purpose of the submitted regulation revisions?
VOCs help produce ground-level ozone and smog, which harm human
health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States
to submit regulations that control VOC emissions.
The California Health and Safety Code (Section 41712(b)) requires
CARB to ``adopt regulations to achieve the maximum feasible reduction
in volatile organic compounds emitted by consumer products, if the
state board determines that adequate data exists to establish both of
the following:
(1) The regulations are necessary to attain state and federal
ambient air quality standards.
(2) The regulations are commercially and technologically feasible
and necessary.''
CARB's consumer products regulations are found under the California
Code of Regulations Title 17 Chapter 1 Subchapter 8.5 and include:
Article 1--Antiperspirants and Deodorants
Article 2--Consumer Products
Article 3--Aerosol Coating Products
Article 4--Alternative Control Plan
Article 5--Hairspray Credit Program
The following are brief descriptions of CARB's consumer product
regulations and the amendments adopted by CARB, which we propose to
approve into the SIP.
1. Antiperspirants and Deodorants
CARB's Antiperspirants and Deodorants (APDO) regulation limits the
percent of high volatility organic compounds (HVOC) and medium
volatility organic compounds (MVOC) in products. The original SIP-
approved regulation contained two tiers of HVOC/MVOC limits, which took
effect in 1992 and 1995. Amendments adopted by CARB include updating
the definition of VOC to be more consistent with EPA's definition in 40
CFR 50.100(s), extending the 18-month sell-through period to 3 years to
incorporate changes in State law, repealing a zero percent limit for
HVOC for aerosol antiperspirants, and clarifying the definition of
``deodorant'' to distinguish products covered under the APDO regulation
from products covered under CARB's general consumer products
regulation.
CARB's SIP-approved regulation originally contained an aggressive
limit of zero percent HVOC for aerosol antiperspirants. CARB later
determined that this limit was not technically feasible, even with a
compliance extension, and repealed it in an October 26, 2000 hearing.
CARB's April 3, 2002 submittal letter to EPA estimated that this would
result in a shortfall in VOC emissions reductions of approximately 1.3
tons per day (tpd) statewide in 2010. CARB indicated, however, that
their Mid-term Measure II Consumer Products regulation would achieve
approximately 21 tpd of VOC emissions reductions, which more than
offset the shortfall. EPA is proposing to act on the APDO and Consumer
Products submittals together.
CARB's APDO regulation is more stringent than EPA's national
Consumer Products rule (40 CFR part 59, subpart C) in the following
ways:
(a) Contains more stringent two tier HVOC/MVOC limits.
(b) Limits sell-through period to 3 years (EPA does not have a
limit for the sell-through period).
(c) Requires compliance by laboratory testing or calculation.
(d) Prohibits use of toxic air contaminants.
(e) Covers retailers.
2. Consumer Products
CARB's Consumer Products regulation limits the VOC content in
products such as air fresheners, automotive products, bathroom
cleaners, hair care products, and insecticides. CARB's 2006 Initial
Statement of Reasons (ISOR) indicates consumer products are a
significant source of VOC emissions in California and accounted for
approximately 260 tpd of VOC emissions in 2005. CARB's ISOR further
indicates that as a result of their consumer products regulations over
the last 15 years, statewide VOC emissions from consumer products were
reduced by over 170 tpd (40 percent reduction) in 2010. Appendix A of
the ISOR further points out that ``emissions from Consumer Products, in
2020, will be the largest source of VOC emissions in the South Coast
Air Basin, and the third largest source in the San Joaquin Valley Air
Basin.''
Revisions to the SIP-approved regulation adopted by CARB include
repealing the aerosol adhesives VOC limit, postponing the second-tier
VOC limit for hairsprays and approximately doubling the number of
consumer product categories for regulation.
CARB originally adopted the VOC limit for aerosol adhesives in 1989
with two tiers. The first tier established a VOC limit of 75 percent,
effective January 1, 1995, and the second tier established a VOC limit
of 25 percent effective January 1, 1997. CARB indicates that the
aerosol adhesives category is small, approximately 0.4 tpd and that
most manufacturers were ``having significant difficulty meeting the 25
percent VOC standard.'' Technical problems encountered included freeze
thaw stability and solvents drying too slowly, too fast, or dissolving
into the substrate. In May 2000, CARB repealed the 25 percent
[[Page 30484]]
VOC limit and adopted three new aerosol adhesive categories. EPA's VOC
content limit for household aerosol adhesives remains at 75 percent. 40
CFR part 59, subpart C, Table 1.
CARB also indicated it had to postpone the second-tier VOC
hairspray limit of 55 percent for 17 months from January 1998 until
June 1999. Although CARB concluded that the 55 percent limit was
technically feasible, additional time was required by manufacturers to
complete product development and testing. CARB explained in its staff
report that the delayed implementation would not compromise its SIP
commitment because air pollution control districts had not claimed the
reductions until the beginning of the 1999 summer ozone season.
Other amendments adopted by CARB include clarifying definitions,
requiring notifications for products sold towards the end of a sell-
through period, prohibiting solid air fresheners or toilet/urinal care
products from containing para-dichlorobenzene (a toxic air contaminant/
hazardous air pollutant) and clarifying that for products manufactured
after January 1, 2007, the ``most restrictive limit'' applies to any
representation made anywhere on the label, packaging, and all affixed
labels. CARB states that it established the sell-through period and
most restrictive limits because of a finding that older non-compliant
products remained on shelves long after the three year sell-through
period and CARB enforcement investigations finding representations made
on the principal display panel that were inconsistent with
representations on the rest of the label or packaging. CARB noted that
``labels have appeared to have been changed to avoid reformulation to
meet VOC limits.'' CARB ISOR May 7, 2004, page V-52. CARB's amendments
also clarify that codes indicating date of manufacture are public
information and cannot be claimed as confidential.
CARB's 1992 SIP-approved regulation covered approximately 50
categories/subcategories of consumer products. Since that time, CARB
has added additional consumer product categories for regulation and has
further reduced the VOC limits in existing categories. The amended rule
covers 112 categories/subcategories of consumer products.
CARB's Consumer Products regulation is more stringent than EPA's
national Consumer Products rule (40 CFR part 59, subpart C) in the
following ways:
(a) Contains more stringent two-tier VOC limits.
(b) Covers more categories of consumer products.
(c) Limits the sell-through period to 3 years.
(d) Requires compliance by laboratory testing or calculation.
(e) Prohibits use of toxic air contaminants and ozone depleting
substances.
(f) Covers retailers.
3. Aerosol Coating Products
EPA approved CARB's Aerosol Coating Products regulation (adopted
May 1, 2001) into the SIP on September 13, 2005. CARB adopted minor
updates to test methods in the regulation at a public hearing in 2004
and clarifications to overlapping requirements between the Aerosol
Coating Products and Consumer Products regulations at a hearing on
November 17, 2006. These amendments covered Rubber and Vinyl
Protectants, Fabric Protectants, Vinyl/Fabric/Leather/Polycarbonate
Coatings, cosmetic products, and other products used on the human body.
The purpose of the 2006 amendments was to clarify that each of these
products would be regulated under only one of these two regulations.
The amendment also clarified that cosmetics and other products used on
the human body are regulated only under the Consumer Products
regulation and exempted from CARB's Aerosol Coatings regulation.
4. Method 310
CARB Method 310 incorporates by reference a number of other test
methods including those from US EPA, the American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM), and the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH). Method 310 also: contains procedures to
separate the propellant from the non-propellant portions of aerosol
products; allows analysis of the propellant and non-propellant portions
for total VOC, exempt VOC or prohibited compounds such as toxic air
contaminants; determines the low vapor pressure VOC status of compounds
and mixtures; and identifies the reactive organic compounds in aerosol
coating products.
The 2005 amendments to Method 310 include updating references to
many of the ASTM and EPA test methods and adding an equation to
calculate the VOC content of low vapor pressure compounds and/or
mixtures.
EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information on
CARB's consumer products regulations.
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the regulations?
Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for
each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines
(CTG) document as well as each major source in nonattainment areas (see
section 182(a)(2) and (b)(2)), and must not relax existing requirements
(see sections 110(l) and 193). California's consumer products
regulations cover VOC area sources and not stationary sources. While
there are no applicable CTGs for these source categories, in 1998 EPA
promulgated national rules to regulate VOC emissions from consumer
products (63 FR 48831, September 11, 1998) and aerosol coating products
(73 FR 15621, March 24, 2008). EPA's national rules largely parallel
CARB's earlier SIP-approved rules. The amendments we are proposing to
approve today are more stringent than EPA's standards.
Rules, guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability and RACT requirements consistently include the
following:
1. Portions of the proposed post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide
policy that concern RACT, 52 FR 45044, November 24, 1987.
2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook).
3. State Implementation Plans, General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (57
FR 13498; April 16, 1992).
4. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
5. 40 CFR Part 59 Subpart C, National Volatile Organic Compound
Emission Standards for Consumer Products; Subpart E, National VOC
Emission Standards for Aerosol Coatings.
B. Do the regulations meet the evaluation criteria?
We believe CARB's Consumer Products regulations are consistent with
the relevant rules and policy and guidance documents regarding
enforceability, RACT, and SIP relaxations. CARB's Antiperspirants and
Deodorants, Consumer Products, and Aerosol Coating Products regulations
contain more stringent limits and cover more than twice the number of
categories covered by EPA's national Consumer Products rule. CARB
found,
[[Page 30485]]
however, that some technology-forcing limits, such as the aerosol
adhesives limit originally adopted in 1989, were not achievable. In
those cases, CARB identified limits that were achievable and offset any
shortfall in emission reductions through greater reductions in other
consumer product categories. The TSDs have more information on our
evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendations to Further Improve the Regulations
The TSD for CARB Method 310 suggests an amendment to clarify an
equation's legend. EPA recommends that CARB adopt this clarifying
amendment the next time it modifies Method 310.
D. Public Comment and Final Action
Because EPA believes the submitted regulations fulfill all relevant
requirements, we are proposing to fully approve them consistent with
section 110(k)(3) of the Act. We are also proposing to approve CARB
Method 310 to support compliance with CARB's APDO, Consumer Products,
and Aerosol Coating Products regulations. We will accept comments from
the public on this proposal for the next 30 days. Unless we receive
convincing new information during the comment period, we intend to
publish a final approval action that will incorporate these regulations
into the federally enforceable SIP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 17, 2009.
Jane Diamond,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E9-15144 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
